WEAVE
WEAVE
Centre for Integrative Psychiatry
Weave Psychotherapy — Vol. 6
Third-Wave Therapies
DBT, Schema Therapy, ACT, MBCT, and Compassion-Focused Therapy
DBT Skills · Schema Modes · 18 EMSs · ACT Hexaflex · MBCT · Biosocial Model · Imagery Rescripting
Dr. Wilfred D'souza
MD Psychiatry
wilfred.desouza1996@gmail.com

Contents

01Deep Study
02Clinical Quick Reference
Weave Psychotherapy · www.weave.clinic
01
Deep Study
Third-Wave Therapies — Weave Psychotherapy Vol. 6
www.weave.clinic
WEAVE Weave Psychotherapy Vol. 6 | Third-Wave Therapies Chapter 01 · Deep Study

D1: Third-Wave Therapies — Deep Study

Table of Contents

  1. What is the "Third Wave"?
  2. Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT)
  3. Schema Therapy (ST)
  4. Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT)
  5. Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy (MBCT)
  6. Compassion-Focused Therapy (CFT)
  7. Comparison Table

1. WHAT IS THE "THIRD WAVE"?

1.1 Hayes' Three Waves of Behaviour Therapy

Steven Hayes (2004) proposed a taxonomy of behaviour therapy's evolution:

First Wave — Classical Behaviourism (1950s-1970s). Rooted in Pavlov, Skinner, and Wolpe. Therapy meant modifying observable behaviour through conditioning: systematic desensitisation, token economies, exposure and response prevention. Internal experience was either irrelevant or inaccessible. The therapist was a technician applying learning principles.

Second Wave — Cognitive Revolution (1970s-1990s). Beck, Ellis, and Meichenbaum brought internal cognitions centre stage. Dysfunctional thoughts cause emotional disturbance; therapy means identifying and changing distorted cognitions. Cognitive restructuring, thought records, Socratic questioning, and guided discovery became the core methods. The therapist was a scientist helping the patient test hypotheses.

Third Wave — Contextual and Process-Based Approaches (1990s-present). Rather than changing the content of thoughts, third-wave therapies change the relationship to thoughts. Key features:

Exam Pearl

The three waves are not sequential replacements — each wave built on and incorporated the previous. DBT uses behavioural skills training (first wave) + cognitive modification (second wave) + acceptance and mindfulness (third wave). Schema Therapy integrates cognitive restructuring (second wave) with experiential techniques, attachment theory, and limited reparenting (third wave).

Exam Strategy

When asked to classify a therapy as "third wave," look for these distinguishing features: acceptance-based stance, mindfulness component, emphasis on the therapeutic relationship as a change mechanism, values orientation, and metacognitive or process-level intervention. If a therapy only uses cognitive restructuring and behavioural experiments, it is second wave.

1.2 The Major Third-Wave Therapies

TherapyFounder(s)YearCore Innovation
Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT)Marsha Linehan1993Dialectics: acceptance + change; skills-based
Schema Therapy (ST)Jeffrey Young1990/2003Early Maladaptive Schemas; limited reparenting
Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT)Steven Hayes1999Psychological flexibility; defusion; values
Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy (MBCT)Segal, Williams, Teasdale2002Mindfulness for depression relapse prevention
Compassion-Focused Therapy (CFT)Paul Gilbert2005Three emotion regulation systems; compassionate mind
Functional Analytic Psychotherapy (FAP)Kohlenberg & Tsai1991In-session behaviour as target of change
Metacognitive Therapy (MCT)Adrian Wells2009Metacognitive beliefs; detached mindfulness
Behavioural Activation (BA)Martell, Addis, Jacobson2001Context, not cognition; valued action in depression
Exam Pearl

Not all authorities classify Schema Therapy as "third wave." Young developed it as an extension of CBT for characterological patients. However, its emphasis on the therapeutic relationship (limited reparenting), experiential techniques (imagery rescripting, chair work), and attachment-based conceptualisation place it firmly in the third-wave tradition. Most contemporary texts include it.


2. DIALECTICAL BEHAVIOR THERAPY (DBT)

2.1 The Biosocial Model

DBT explains chronic emotional dysregulation through a transactional model:

Biological vulnerability — three features:

Invalidating environment — consistently communicates that internal experiences are wrong, inappropriate, or an overreaction. Three types:

  1. Punishing or dismissing valid emotional expression ("Stop crying, there's nothing to cry about")
  2. Intermittently reinforcing only extreme emotional displays (shapes escalation)
  3. Oversimplifying solutions ("Just say no," "Just try harder")

The transaction between biological vulnerability and environmental invalidation produces: emotional dysregulation, self-invalidation, behavioural dysregulation (impulsivity/avoidance), interpersonal dysregulation, and identity confusion.

Exam Pearl

The biosocial model is transactional, not linear. The child's emotional sensitivity shapes parental responses; parental invalidation worsens the child's dysregulation; escalation cycles establish patterns. Neither biology nor environment alone is "the cause." This is the biosocial transaction.

Clinical Anchor

In clinical practice, presenting the biosocial model to patients is a powerful de-shaming intervention. It says: "Your problems are not your fault (biology + environment), but they are your responsibility to solve." This captures the central dialectic of DBT.

2.2 Dialectical Philosophy

DBT is grounded in three principles of dialectical philosophy:

  1. Interrelatedness — everything is connected; a change in one part of the system affects all other parts
  2. Polarity — reality is composed of opposing forces (thesis and antithesis); truth lies in the synthesis
  3. Continuous change — the only constant is change; both patient and therapist are always evolving

The fundamental dialectic in DBT: acceptance and change. The patient is doing the best they can AND needs to do better. The therapist validates the patient's suffering AND pushes for new behaviour. Acceptance without change is stagnation. Change without acceptance is invalidation.

Exam Pearl

Three dialectical dilemmas in standard DBT (Linehan): (1) Emotional vulnerability vs. self-invalidation, (2) Active passivity vs. apparent competence, (3) Unrelenting crisis vs. inhibited experiencing. Each generates secondary treatment targets.

Exam Pearl

Three additional adolescent-specific dialectical dilemmas (Rathus & Miller): (1) Excessive leniency vs. authoritarian control, (2) Normalising pathological behaviours vs. pathologising normative behaviours, (3) Forcing autonomy vs. fostering dependence.

2.3 Four Treatment Modes

ModeFunctionSetting
Individual therapyMotivational; applies skills to specific problems; processes diary card; follows target hierarchyWeekly, 1 hour
Skills groupSkills acquisition and strengthening; teaching new capabilitiesWeekly, 2-2.5 hours
Phone coachingSkills generalisation to real-life crises; brief, skill-focused callsAs needed, between sessions
Consultation teamTherapy for the therapists; prevents burnout, maintains fidelity; treats therapists' own dialectical dilemmasWeekly, 1-2 hours
Exam Pearl

The four modes serve four distinct functions and must not be conflated. Individual therapy is for motivation and problem-solving; skills group is for capability. A patient cannot call the individual therapist to "process" emotions — phone coaching is specifically for "help me use a skill right now." The consultation team is not supervision — it is therapy for the therapist within a DBT framework.

Clinical Anchor

In adolescent DBT (Rathus & Miller), the skills group becomes a multifamily group — parents attend alongside teens. This directly addresses the invalidating environment by teaching parents the same skills and validation principles.

2.4 Target Hierarchy

The target hierarchy governs what is addressed in individual therapy sessions, in strict order:

Stage 1 Individual Therapy Target Hierarchy:

  1. Life-threatening behaviours — suicidal ideation, self-harm, homicidal ideation
  2. Therapy-interfering behaviours — missed sessions, non-compliance, therapist burnout
  3. Quality-of-life-interfering behaviours — substance use, housing instability, eating disorders, interpersonal chaos
  4. Increasing behavioural skills — generalising skills from group to daily life

Stage 1 Skills Training Target Hierarchy:

  1. Decrease behaviours likely to destroy therapy
  2. Increase skills acquisition, strengthening, and generalisation
Exam Strategy

If an exam question describes a patient who missed sessions, used substances, and had suicidal thoughts this week, the correct answer for what to address first is always suicidal behaviour (life-threatening > therapy-interfering > quality-of-life). The hierarchy is absolute.

2.5 Stage Model (Stages 1-4)

StageFocusGoal
PretreatmentOrientation, assessment, commitmentInformed consent; mutual agreement to proceed
Stage 1Behavioural stabilisationAttain basic capacities — safety, control
Stage 2Emotional processingReduce post-traumatic stress; exposure for trauma
Stage 3Ordinary life problemsIncrease self-respect; pursue individual goals
Stage 4CompletenessCapacity for sustained joy; spiritual fulfilment
Exam Pearl

Most DBT manuals and research address Stage 1 only. Stage 2 incorporates prolonged exposure techniques. Stage 4 was inspired by Linehan's Zen practice and addresses the existential dimension — moving from "a life worth living" to "a life experienced as complete."

2.6 DBT Skills by Module

Core Mindfulness

Skill CategorySkillsDescription
Three States of MindEmotional Mind, Reasonable Mind, Wise MindWise Mind = synthesis of emotion and reason; intuitive knowing
"What" SkillsObserveNotice internal/external experience without words; "Teflon mind"
DescribePut words on observations; stick to facts, no interpretations
ParticipateThrow yourself fully into the current activity; "in the zone"
"How" SkillsNon-judgmentallyNotice without evaluating as good/bad; replace judgments with descriptions
One-mindfullyDo one thing at a time; when mind wanders, return gently
EffectivelyDo what works; let go of "right" vs. "wrong"; focus on goals
Exam Pearl

Mindfulness is not a separate module taught once — it is the foundation module, repeated before every other module begins. You cannot use any DBT skill without first noticing you need it. Mindfulness is the "gateway skill."

Distress Tolerance

Crisis Survival Skills:

SkillAcronym/NameComponents
TIPPTemperature, Intense exercise, Paced breathing, Progressive relaxationRapid physiological downregulation; activates PNS; for "red zone" distress
STOPStop, Take a step back, Observe, Proceed mindfullyImpulse control; prevents acting on the first urge
Wise Mind ACCEPTSActivities, Contributing, Comparisons, Emotions, Pushing away, Thoughts, SensationsDistraction techniques; done mindfully
Self-SootheSix senses: Vision, Hearing, Touch, Smell, Taste, MovementSensory self-comfort
IMPROVE the MomentImagery, Meaning, Prayer, Relaxation, One thing, Vacation, EncouragementIn-the-moment coping enhancers
Pros and ConsWeigh pros/cons of acting on urge vs. using skillsLabel each as short-term or long-term

Reality Acceptance Skills:

SkillDescription
Radical AcceptanceFull acknowledgment of reality as it is; acceptance does not equal approval; Pain + Non-acceptance = Suffering
Turning the MindRepeated, moment-by-moment choice to accept reality; acceptance is not a single decision
Willingness vs. WillfulnessWillingness = doing what the situation requires; Willfulness = refusing to engage with reality
Half-SmileSubtle relaxation of facial muscles; behavioural cue for acceptance
Exam Pearl

TIPP skills work as fast as dysfunctional behaviours (self-harm, substance use) but without the negative consequences. The Temperature skill activates the mammalian dive reflex: cold water on the face triggers the vagus nerve, rapidly reducing heart rate. This is parasympathetic activation — the physiological mechanism is identical to that targeted by vagal nerve stimulation.

Clinical Anchor

Radical acceptance is not agreeing that bad things are acceptable. It is acknowledging that they happened. Pain is unavoidable; suffering is pain multiplied by non-acceptance. "This should not have happened to me" is the non-acceptance that converts pain into prolonged suffering.

Emotion Regulation

SkillAcronym/NameComponents
ABC PLEASEAccumulate positives, Build mastery, Cope ahead, treat PhysicaL illness, balance Eating, Avoid mood-altering substances, balance Sleep, get ExerciseVulnerability reduction; proactive emotional management
Check the FactsIs the emotion fitting the facts? Are interpretations accurate?
Opposite ActionAct opposite to the emotional action urge — all the way — when emotion does not fit the facts
Problem SolvingWhen emotion fits the facts, solve the problem systematically
The Wave SkillMindfulness of Current EmotionObserve emotion as a wave; do not fight, do not hold; let it pass
Model of EmotionsA-B-C-D chainVulnerability factors → Prompting event → Interpretation → Response → Aftereffects

Opposite Action — Master Table:

EmotionAction UrgeOpposite Action
FearAvoid, escapeApproach; confront repeatedly (exposure)
AngerAttack, confrontAvoid temporarily; approach with empathy and kindness
SadnessWithdraw, be passiveBecome active; engage; resume pleasurable activities
Shame (unjustified)Hide, lower headGo public; stand tall; maintain eye contact
Shame (justified)Hide, punish selfFace the music; accept responsibility; apologise; repair
Guilt (justified)Beg forgivenessApologise once; make amends; commit to change
Guilt (unjustified)Over-apologiseDo not apologise; stand tall; let go
JealousyDemand, control, checkDo not act on jealousy; engage in other activities
Exam Pearl

Opposite action only works when done "all the way" — posture, tone of voice, facial expression, thoughts, and actions must all be opposite. Half-hearted opposite action does not change the emotion. This is consistent with the facial feedback hypothesis and embodied cognition research.

Mnemonic

ABC PLEASE — the "ABC" is proactive (Accumulate positives, Build mastery, Cope ahead) and the "PLEASE" is preventive (PhysicaL illness, Eating, Avoid substances, Sleep, Exercise). Together they reduce vulnerability before emotions fire.

Interpersonal Effectiveness

SkillAcronymGoalComponents
DEAR MANDescribe, Express, Assert, Reinforce, Mindful, Appear confident, NegotiateGetting what you want / saying noObjective effectiveness
GIVEGentle, Interested, Validate, Easy mannerMaintaining the relationshipRelationship effectiveness
FASTFair, no Apologies, Stick to values, TruthfulMaintaining self-respectSelf-respect effectiveness
THINKThink, Have empathy, Interpretations, Notice, KindnessReducing hostile attributionsAdolescent-specific (Rathus & Miller)
Exam Pearl

DEAR MAN, GIVE, and FAST represent three different goals of any interpersonal interaction: getting your objective (DEAR MAN), keeping the relationship (GIVE), and keeping your self-respect (FAST). The clinical skill is knowing which to prioritise in a given situation. They are not always compatible — sometimes getting what you want costs the relationship.

Mnemonic

DEAR MAN = the "what to do" (Describe, Express, Assert, Reinforce) + the "how to do it" (Mindful, Appear confident, Negotiate). The first four letters are content; the last three are style.

Walking the Middle Path (Adolescent DBT)

ComponentContent
DialecticsMove from "either/or" to "both/and"; find the kernel of truth in each side; no absolute truth
ValidationSix levels of validation (see below); validate the valid, not the invalid
Behaviour ChangePositive reinforcement, negative reinforcement, shaping, extinction, punishment; behavioural burst during extinction
Exam Pearl

Walking the Middle Path is unique to adolescent DBT (Rathus & Miller, 2015). It is not in standard adult DBT. It directly addresses the three adolescent-specific dialectical dilemmas by teaching families dialectical thinking, validation skills, and behaviour-change principles.

2.7 DBT Mnemonics Master Table

MnemonicStands ForModuleUse
DEAR MANDescribe, Express, Assert, Reinforce, Mindful, Appear confident, NegotiateInterpersonal EffectivenessAsking for what you want; saying no
GIVEGentle, Interested, Validate, Easy mannerInterpersonal EffectivenessMaintaining relationships
FASTFair, no Apologies, Stick to values, TruthfulInterpersonal EffectivenessMaintaining self-respect
THINKThink, Have empathy, Interpretations, Notice, KindnessInterpersonal Effectiveness (adolescent)Reducing hostile attributions
TIPPTemperature, Intense exercise, Paced breathing, Progressive relaxationDistress ToleranceRapid crisis downregulation
STOPStop, Take a step back, Observe, Proceed mindfullyDistress ToleranceImpulse control
ACCEPTSActivities, Contributing, Comparisons, Emotions, Pushing away, Thoughts, SensationsDistress ToleranceDistraction in crisis
IMPROVEImagery, Meaning, Prayer, Relaxation, One thing, Vacation, EncouragementDistress ToleranceImproving the moment
ABC PLEASEAccumulate positives, Build mastery, Cope ahead, PhysicaL illness, Eating, Avoid substances, Sleep, ExerciseEmotion RegulationReducing vulnerability
WAVE— (metaphor)Emotion RegulationMindfulness of current emotion

2.8 Validation Levels 1-6

LevelNameDescriptionExample
1Unbiased listeningFull attentive presence; putting aside distractionsPutting phone down, making eye contact, staying focused
2Accurate reflectionParaphrasing without distortion"So what you're saying is..."
3Mind-readingArticulating unspoken thoughts or feelings from nonverbal cues"I can see this is really painful for you right now"
4Validation by past historyBehaviour makes sense given learning history and past experiences"Given what you've been through, of course you react this way"
5Validation by current contextBehaviour makes sense given current circumstances; normalising"Anyone in your situation would feel anxious right now"
6Radical genuinenessTreating the person as a capable equal; honest, direct, warmGiving honest feedback without being patronising
Exam Pearl

Level 5 validation is the heart of DBT validation — it normalises the patient's response within their current context. Level 6 is the highest level and the hardest — radical genuineness means treating the patient as capable of handling truth, not as fragile. Many therapists avoid Level 6 out of their own discomfort with directness.

Exam Strategy

If asked about "the most important level of validation in DBT," the answer is Level 5 (current context). If asked about "the highest level," the answer is Level 6 (radical genuineness).

2.9 Chain Analysis and Solution Analysis

Chain analysis is a detailed behavioural assessment of the sequence leading to a problem behaviour:

  1. Identify the problem behaviour (specific, observable)
  2. Identify the prompting event (what set it off)
  3. Identify vulnerability factors (what made you susceptible today)
  4. Map the chain: event → thought → emotion → body sensation → action urge → behaviour, link by link
  5. Identify consequences (reinforcers maintaining the behaviour)

Solution analysis follows immediately:

  1. At each link in the chain, identify which skill could have interrupted the sequence
  2. Develop a prevention plan for vulnerability factors
  3. Commit to specific skill use if the chain begins again
Clinical Anchor

Chain analysis is not punishment — it is collaborative detective work. Done well, patients begin to see the predictable cascade that leads to their problem behaviours and gain agency over the process. Done badly (interrogation style, blame-focused), it becomes aversive and therapy-interfering.

2.10 Diary Card

The diary card is a weekly self-monitoring tool completed daily. It tracks:

The diary card is reviewed at the start of every individual therapy session. It determines which targets are addressed according to the target hierarchy.

Exam Pearl

If the diary card shows both suicidal urges and missed skills group, suicidal urges are addressed first (life-threatening > therapy-interfering). The diary card is not optional — not completing it is itself a therapy-interfering behaviour.

2.11 Evidence Base

StudyDesignFinding
Linehan et al. (1991)RCT, BPD womenDBT superior to TAU: fewer suicide attempts, less self-harm, fewer hospitalisations, lower dropout
Linehan et al. (2006)RCT, BPD womenDBT superior to community treatment by experts: halved suicide attempts, reduced self-harm, ED visits, psychiatric hospitalisation
Rathus & Miller (2002)Quasi-experimental, suicidal adolescentsDBT feasible for adolescents; fewer hospitalisations, lower dropout than TAU
Mehlum et al. (2014)RCT, self-harming adolescents16-week adolescent DBT superior to enhanced usual care: significant reduction in self-harm and suicidality
Linehan et al. (2015)Skills training component analysisDBT skills training alone (without individual therapy) reduced suicidal ideation, depression, and anxiety

3. SCHEMA THERAPY (ST)

3.1 The 18 Early Maladaptive Schemas and 5 Domains

Early Maladaptive Schemas (EMSs) are broad, pervasive patterns of memories, emotions, cognitions, and bodily sensations regarding oneself and relationships, developed in childhood when core emotional needs go unmet, and repeated throughout life. Behaviour is NOT part of the schema itself — it is a coping response.

Five core emotional needs:

  1. Secure attachment to others
  2. Autonomy and competence
  3. Freedom to express valid needs and emotions
  4. Spontaneity and play
  5. Realistic limits and self-control
Mnemonic

MNEMONIC: DISCO for the 5 schema domains — Disconnection & Rejection, Impaired Autonomy, Impaired LimitS, Other-direCtedness, Overvigilance & Inhibition.

Full 18 EMSs Table

Domain#SchemaCore BeliefTypical Origins
I. Disconnection & Rejection1Abandonment/Instability"People I love will leave me or be unpredictable"Unstable, unpredictable parent; early loss
2Mistrust/Abuse"Others will hurt, exploit, or betray me"Physical, sexual, emotional abuse; exploitation
3Emotional Deprivation"My emotional needs will never be met"Cold, unaffectionate parents; three subtypes: nurturance, empathy, protection
4Defectiveness/Shame"I am fundamentally flawed and unlovable"Critical, rejecting parents; compared to siblings
5Social Isolation/Alienation"I don't belong; I am different from everyone"Family different from surroundings; not fitting in
II. Impaired Autonomy & Performance6Dependence/Incompetence"I cannot handle life without help"Overprotective parents who did everything for child
7Vulnerability to Harm/Illness"Catastrophe is imminent and I cannot prevent it"Anxious parent who modelled catastrophising
8Enmeshment/Undeveloped Self"I have no identity apart from significant others"Enmeshed family; parent who lived through child
9Failure"I am stupid, inept, and will always fail"Parents who criticised achievement; unrecognised ADHD
III. Impaired Limits10Entitlement/Grandiosity"I am superior; rules don't apply to me"Permissive, overindulgent parents; OR overcompensation for deprivation
11Insufficient Self-Control"I cannot tolerate frustration or control impulses"Lack of discipline or structure in childhood
IV. Other-Directedness12Subjugation"I must submit or others will punish/abandon me"Domineering, controlling parent
13Self-Sacrifice"I must meet others' needs at my own expense"Weak, needy, or ill parent; parentified child
14Approval-Seeking"I need others' approval to feel worthy"Parents valued status over emotional needs
V. Overvigilance & Inhibition15Negativity/Pessimism"Things will go wrong; I must be prepared for the worst"Pessimistic, worried parent; repeated losses
16Emotional Inhibition"I must suppress my emotions to avoid disapproval"Family discouraged emotional expression
17Unrelenting Standards"I must be perfect to avoid criticism"Parents who set impossibly high standards
18Punitiveness"Mistakes deserve harsh punishment"Punitive, unforgiving parents
Exam Pearl

The domain distribution is 5-4-2-3-4 (easy to remember: the Impaired Limits domain has only 2 schemas — Entitlement and Insufficient Self-Control). Domain I (Disconnection & Rejection) contains the schemas most associated with personality disorders.

Exam Pearl

Conditional schemas (Subjugation, Self-Sacrifice, Approval-Seeking, Emotional Inhibition, Unrelenting Standards) develop later as attempts to cope with unconditional schemas (the remaining 13). Example: Unrelenting Standards develops in response to Defectiveness — "If I can be perfect, I will be worthy of love."

Exam Pearl

Behaviour is NOT part of the schema. Schemas comprise memories, emotions, cognitions, and bodily sensations. This is why different patients use different — even opposite — behaviours to cope with the same schema (surrender vs. avoidance vs. overcompensation).

3.2 Schema Modes

Modes are moment-to-moment emotional states and coping responses. While schemas are traits, modes are states. Modes are more directly accessible and targetable in session.

Schema Modes Table (Young 2003 — 10 modes)

CategoryModeDescription
Child ModesVulnerable ChildFeels abandoned, abused, deprived, helpless, frightened
Angry ChildEnraged about unmet needs; vents without regard for consequences
Impulsive/Undisciplined ChildActs impulsively; low frustration tolerance
Happy ChildCore needs met; spontaneous, content
Coping ModesCompliant SurrendererPassive, subservient; submits to avoid conflict
Detached ProtectorEmotionally withdrawn, numb; may use substances or fantasy
OvercompensatorCounterattacks; appears grandiose, aggressive, or controlling
Parent ModesPunitive/Critical ParentPunishes child for expressing needs; harsh self-criticism
Demanding ParentSets impossibly high expectations; pressures for perfection
Healthy ModeHealthy AdultNurtures Vulnerable Child, limits Angry/Impulsive Child, battles maladaptive modes

Arntz/Bernstein Expanded Mode Model (18 modes)

CategoryModeKey Affect/Function
Dysfunctional Child — VulnerabilityLonely childEmpty, alone, unlovable
Abandoned/abused childFear, pain, defencelessness
Humiliated/inferior childShame, inferiority
Dependent childOverwhelmed, regressive
Dysfunctional Child — AngerAngry childFrustrated, rebellious
Obstinate childPassive resistance
Enraged childUncontrolled aggression
Dysfunctional Child — DisciplineImpulsive childSelfish, no delay of gratification
Undisciplined childGives up, cannot tolerate boredom
Dysfunctional ParentPunitive parentSelf-loathing, harsh criticism
Demanding parentExcessive standards, pressure
Coping — SurrenderCompliant surrenderPassive, subservient, self-deprecating
Coping — AvoidanceDetached protectorEmotional shutdown, dissociation
Avoidant protectorBehavioural avoidance of situations
Angry protectorWall of anger for distance
Detached self-sootherAddictive soothing/stimulation
Coping — OvercompensationSelf-aggrandiserGrandiose, denigrating
Attention-seekerExtravagant, approval-seeking
Perfectionistic overcontrollerControl via perfectionism
Paranoid overcontrollerControl via vigilance/suspicion
Bully & attackIntimidation, hot aggression
Conning/manipulativeDeceit for goals
PredatorCold, ruthless elimination of threats
HealthyHappy childCore needs met, spontaneous
Healthy adultRealistic, responsible, balanced
Exam Pearl

Young (2003) described 10 modes. Arntz & Jacob (2013) expanded to 18+ modes, primarily by differentiating coping modes more granularly. The expanded model is assessed via the Schema Mode Inventory (SMI; Lobbestael et al., 2010).

Clinical Anchor

Differentiating anger-related modes uses countertransference: angry child = impulsive, childlike, patient wants repair; angry protector = secondary emotion creating distance, wall-like quality; bully & attack = controlled intimidation, therapist feels threatened. Your own emotional response tells you which mode you are facing.

3.3 Three Coping Styles

Coping StyleThreat Response AnalogueMechanismExample (Abandonment Schema)
SurrenderFreezeGives in to the schema; behaves as if it were trueSelects uncommitted partners and stays
AvoidanceFlightAvoids triggering situations, emotions, or thoughtsAvoids intimate relationships; drinks when alone
OvercompensationFightBehaves as though the opposite of the schema were trueClings, smothers; attacks partner for minor separations
Mnemonic

MNEMONIC: SAO — Surrender (Freeze), Avoidance (Flight), Overcompensation (Fight). Same schema, three completely different behavioural presentations.

3.4 Limited Reparenting

The defining therapeutic relationship model of Schema Therapy. The therapist provides, within appropriate boundaries, what the patient needed but did not receive from parents. This is not becoming a parent — it is a consistent relational stance calibrated to the patient's unmet needs:

Exam Pearl

Nadort et al. (2009) showed that crisis phone support outside office hours adds no benefit for BPD patients receiving Schema Therapy. This was removed from the protocol. Email contact is offered instead.

3.5 Core Techniques

Cognitive techniques: Schema validity testing, reframing evidence, coping-style pros/cons, schema flash cards, schema diaries.

Experiential techniques:

Behavioural techniques: Pattern-breaking assignments, social skills training, exposure with response prevention (for coping modes), positive activity scheduling.

Exam Pearl

In imagery rescripting, the therapist does NOT ask permission to enter the scene — they simply step in. Three types of helping figures correspond to healthy adult strength: (1) therapist enters (weak HA), (2) third-party helper (intermediate), (3) patient as own HA (strong). Progression across therapy: 1 → 2 → 3.

Exam Pearl

Imagery rescripting is NOT exposure therapy. Arntz et al. (2007) showed IR was superior to imaginal exposure on guilt, shame, and anger control in PTSD. The patient contacts the emotion but is not required to relive the full trauma.

3.6 Mode Model for BPD

Four core BPD modes:

  1. Abandoned/abused child — intense abandonment fear, helplessness
  2. Angry/impulsive child — rage at unfair treatment + impulsive need fulfilment
  3. Punitive parent — extreme self-hatred (the signature BPD mode)
  4. Detached protector — emotional shutdown, dissociation, substance use

Treatment: 2-3 years, starting at 2x/week. Phase 1 (up to 1 year): work with coping modes, build therapeutic relationship. Phase 2: imagery rescripting for trauma, chair dialogues against punitive parent. Phase 3: transfer healthy adult role, behavioural pattern-breaking.

Exam Pearl

Giesen-Bloo et al. (2006) found psychotropic medication — particularly sedatives/benzodiazepines — significantly reduced ST effectiveness in BPD, likely by blocking emotional intensity required for experiential interventions. This is one of the few studies showing medication can impair psychotherapy outcomes.

3.7 Evidence Base

StudyFinding
Giesen-Bloo et al. (2006)Outpatient ST superior to TFP for BPD (RCT, Archives of General Psychiatry)
Farrell et al. (2009)Group ST effective for BPD outpatients
Nadort et al. (2009)Crisis phone support adds no benefit; removed from protocol
Bamelis et al. (2014)ST effective for Cluster C personality disorders and paranoid PD
Arntz et al. (2007)IR superior to imaginal exposure for PTSD on anger, guilt, shame

4. ACCEPTANCE AND COMMITMENT THERAPY (ACT)

4.1 Theoretical Foundation

ACT (pronounced as one word, "act") is rooted in Relational Frame Theory (RFT), a post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition. RFT proposes that human suffering is largely a product of language: the ability to relate events symbolically means we can re-experience pain through words alone ("remembering" a loss), create suffering about the future ("what if I fail"), and fuse with verbal rules that restrict our behaviour ("I'm not the kind of person who...").

The fundamental problem is not the content of thoughts but our relationship to them. Attempting to control or eliminate unwanted thoughts and feelings (experiential avoidance) is itself the pathological process. ACT targets not symptoms but psychological inflexibility — the rigid dominance of verbal processes over direct experience, leading to behaviour that is incongruent with values.

Exam Pearl

ACT is the only third-wave therapy built on an explicit basic science foundation (RFT). While other therapies are empirically tested treatment packages, ACT's theoretical model generates novel, testable predictions about language, cognition, and behaviour change.

4.2 Psychological Flexibility and the Hexaflex

The goal of ACT is psychological flexibility: the ability to contact the present moment fully as a conscious human being, and to change or persist in behaviour in the service of chosen values. Six core processes, arranged in a "hexaflex" model, interact to produce flexibility:

ProcessInflexibility PoleFlexibility PoleDescription
AcceptanceExperiential avoidanceAcceptanceWillingness to have unwanted internal experiences without trying to change, escape, or avoid them
Cognitive DefusionCognitive fusionDefusionSeeing thoughts as thoughts (mental events) rather than as literal truths; stepping back from thought content
Present MomentDominance of past/futurePresent-moment awarenessFlexible, voluntary attention to the here-and-now; mindfulness
Self-as-ContextAttachment to conceptualised selfSelf-as-contextThe observing self — a stable perspective from which to notice changing thoughts, feelings, and roles; "the sky, not the weather"
ValuesLack of values clarityValuesChosen life directions that give meaning; not goals but ongoing directions
Committed ActionInaction/impulsivity/avoidanceCommitted actionConcrete behaviours in service of values; includes willingness to fail and try again
Exam Pearl

The hexaflex has two overarching processes: (1) Mindfulness and acceptance processes (acceptance, defusion, present moment, self-as-context) and (2) Commitment and behaviour change processes (values, committed action). The six processes are not sequential stages — they are interdependent and worked on simultaneously.

Mnemonic

The hexaflex can be remembered as: "Accept thoughts (acceptance + defusion) while being here (present moment + self-as-context) and doing what matters (values + committed action)."

4.3 Key Techniques

Creative hopelessness: The therapist helps the patient recognise that all prior attempts to control or eliminate unwanted internal experiences have failed — not because the patient was bad at it, but because the control agenda itself is the problem. This is not nihilism; it creates openness to an alternative approach.

Defusion techniques: "I'm having the thought that I'm worthless" (not "I'm worthless"); thanking your mind for the thought; singing intrusive thoughts to a silly tune; saying the thought slowly until it becomes just sounds; "leaves on a stream" exercise.

Values clarification: Identifying what truly matters across life domains (relationships, work, health, play, spirituality). Values are not goals — they are directions. You never "achieve" a value; you move toward it.

Committed action: Specific, concrete, values-consistent behaviour patterns. Includes exposure exercises, skills building, and goal-setting — similar to traditional CBT behavioural activation but explicitly linked to values rather than mood improvement.

Clinical Anchor

ACT does not aim to reduce symptoms. It aims to increase psychological flexibility. Symptom reduction may occur as a byproduct, but it is not the goal. This is a fundamental philosophical departure from both CBT and DBT, and exam questions sometimes test this distinction.

4.4 Evidence Base

ConditionEvidence LevelKey Finding
Chronic painStrong (multiple RCTs)ACT superior to TAU and comparable to CBT; improvements in disability, pain interference
DepressionModerate (RCTs)ACT comparable to CBT; mediational analyses support flexibility as mechanism
Anxiety disordersModerate (RCTs)ACT comparable to CBT; especially effective when experiential avoidance is prominent
PsychosisEmerging (RCTs)ACT reduces rehospitalisation and distress associated with hallucinations
Substance useEmergingACT shows promise for smoking cessation and polysubstance use
TransdiagnosticGrowingACT increasingly used as a transdiagnostic intervention; flexibility is dimension, not diagnosis-specific
Exam Pearl

A-Tjak et al. (2015, meta-analysis, Behaviour Research and Therapy) found ACT superior to control conditions across all outcomes and comparable to CBT. ACT showed particular strength when experiential avoidance was the primary maintaining factor.


5. MINDFULNESS-BASED COGNITIVE THERAPY (MBCT)

5.1 Theoretical Foundation

MBCT was developed by Zindel Segal, Mark Williams, and John Teasdale specifically to prevent relapse in recurrent depression. It is not a general mindfulness programme — it has a precise theoretical rationale.

Differential activation hypothesis (Teasdale, 1988): In remitted depression, low mood can reactivate the specific cognitive patterns (negative automatic thoughts, rumination, hopelessness) that were present during the depressive episode. This reactivation occurs through associative memory networks — the more episodes a person has had, the less mood provocation is required to trigger the full depressive cognitive package. After three or more episodes, relapse can be triggered by normal sadness.

Rumination as mechanism: Rumination (repetitive, self-focused, analytical thinking about causes and consequences of distress) maintains and deepens depressive episodes. MBCT targets rumination not by changing thought content but by changing the mode of processing: from "doing mode" (goal-directed, discrepancy-monitoring, analytical) to "being mode" (present-focused, accepting, experiential).

Exam Pearl

MBCT works by preventing the "cognitive reactivation cascade" — the process by which mild dysphoria snowballs into full relapse through rumination. It does not treat acute depression. Its primary indication is relapse prevention in patients with three or more prior episodes of depression.

Exam Pearl

The "doing mode" vs. "being mode" distinction is central to MBCT. Doing mode monitors the gap between current state and desired state (discrepancy monitoring), which triggers more effortful processing, which deepens rumination. Being mode accepts current experience as it is, interrupting the discrepancy-monitoring loop.

5.2 The 8-Session Structure

SessionThemeKey Practices
1Automatic pilotRaisin exercise (mindful eating); body scan; recognising autopilot
2Dealing with barriersBody scan; thoughts and feelings exercise; identifying wandering mind
3Mindfulness of the breathSitting meditation (breath focus); 3-minute breathing space; seeing/hearing exercise
4Staying presentSitting meditation (breath + body); recognising aversion; "thoughts are not facts"
5Allowing/letting beSitting meditation (sounds, thoughts); exploring difficulty; working with aversion
6Thoughts are not factsSitting meditation (choiceless awareness); moods and alternative viewpoints
7How can I best take care of myself?Links between activity and mood; nourishing vs. depleting activities; relapse signature; action plan
8Using what has been learnedReview of course; body scan; maintaining practice; relapse prevention plan

The 3-Minute Breathing Space: The signature MBCT micro-practice, taught from Session 3 and used throughout.

Exam Pearl

The 3-minute breathing space is used both as a scheduled practice (3x daily) and as a "coping" breathing space (when noticing the beginnings of rumination or mood shift). It is the bridge between formal meditation and daily life — the most clinically important MBCT practice.

Clinical Anchor

MBCT is delivered as a group programme (12-15 participants) over 8 weeks with daily homework (45 minutes of formal practice + informal practice). It is not individual therapy. The group format is essential — it normalises the experience and creates a community of practice.

5.3 Evidence Base

StudyFinding
Teasdale et al. (2000)MBCT reduced relapse by 44% in patients with 3+ prior episodes vs. TAU; no benefit for 1-2 episodes
Ma & Teasdale (2004)Replicated: MBCT halved relapse risk for 3+ episodes; specific to those with childhood adversity
Kuyken et al. (2008)MBCT comparable to maintenance antidepressant medication for relapse prevention
Kuyken et al. (2015)MINDFUL trial (RCT, n=424): MBCT with tapering antidepressants non-inferior to maintenance antidepressants over 24 months
NICE (2009, updated 2022)MBCT recommended for recurrent depression (3+ episodes) as relapse prevention
Exam Pearl

MBCT is effective specifically for patients with three or more prior depressive episodes. Teasdale et al. (2000) found NO benefit for patients with only 1-2 episodes. The differential activation hypothesis explains this: with fewer episodes, relapse is driven more by life events than by cognitive reactivation, so a cognitive intervention adds less.


6. COMPASSION-FOCUSED THERAPY (CFT)

6.1 Theoretical Foundation

CFT was developed by Paul Gilbert for patients with high shame and self-criticism — particularly those who can generate alternative thoughts cognitively but cannot feel reassured by them. Gilbert's key insight: understanding intellectually that you are not worthless does not reduce shame if the emotional system generating shame is not also addressed.

6.2 Three Emotion Regulation Systems

SystemFunctionAffectNeurobiologyPathology When Dominant
Threat/ProtectionDetect and respond to dangerAnxiety, anger, disgust, shameAmygdala, HPA axis, SNSAnxiety disorders, PTSD, OCD, shame-based conditions
Drive/Resource-SeekingPursue goals, rewards, and resourcesExcitement, anticipation, pleasureDopamine circuits, nucleus accumbensMania, addiction, narcissism, workaholism
Soothing/AffiliationCalm, connect, feel safeContentment, safety, connectionOxytocin, endorphins, vagal toneInadequately developed in high-shame patients
Exam Pearl

The core pathology in CFT's model is an underdeveloped soothing/affiliation system combined with an overactive threat system. Many patients oscillate between threat (anxiety, self-criticism) and drive (achievement, perfectionism) without ever accessing soothing. Traditional CBT addresses the threat system (cognitive restructuring of threats) but does not build the soothing system.

6.3 Compassionate Mind Training

CFT uses specific exercises to activate and strengthen the soothing/affiliation system:

Clinical Anchor

CFT is especially indicated when standard CBT cognitive restructuring produces intellectual change without emotional change — "I know I'm not worthless but I still feel it." This gap between head and heart is the signal that the soothing system needs building, not just the threat system needs correcting.

Exam Pearl

Gilbert identified three "flows" of compassion: compassion for others, compassion from others, and self-compassion. Many patients can feel compassion for others but cannot receive it or generate it for themselves. The "flows" help identify where the blockage lies.


7. COMPARISON TABLE

7.1 Third-Wave Therapies Compared

DimensionDBTSchema TherapyACTMBCTCFT
FounderLinehan (1993)Young (1990/2003)Hayes (1999)Segal, Williams, Teasdale (2002)Gilbert (2005)
Theoretical basisBiosocial model + dialectics + ZenUnmet childhood needs → EMSs; attachment theoryRFT; functional contextualismDifferential activation; cognitive vulnerability to relapseEvolutionary psychology; three emotion regulation systems
Core conceptAcceptance + changeEarly Maladaptive Schemas and modesPsychological flexibilityMindful awareness preventing cognitive reactivationCompassion as antidote to shame
Primary targetEmotional dysregulation; suicidalityCharacterological patterns; personality disordersExperiential avoidance; psychological inflexibilityDepressive relapse (3+ episodes)High shame; self-criticism
FormatIndividual + group + phone + consult teamIndividual (1-2x/week); some group adaptationsIndividual or group8-session group programmeIndividual or group
Duration1 year (standard); 24 weeks (adolescent)1-3 years (personality disorders)8-16 sessions typically8 weeks12-20 sessions typically
Therapeutic relationshipDialectical: validation + problem-solvingLimited reparenting + empathic confrontationFunctional; therapist models flexibilityGroup facilitator; teacherCompassionate; models warmth/non-judgment
Key techniquesSkills training, chain analysis, diary card, validationImagery rescripting, chair work, flash cards, pattern-breakingDefusion, values clarification, creative hopelessness, committed actionMindfulness meditation, body scan, 3-minute breathing spaceCompassionate imagery, compassionate self, fears of compassion
Mindfulness roleCore module; gateway skillNot central; used in some adaptationsPresent-moment awareness (1 of 6 processes)Central and definingEmbedded in compassionate awareness practices
Evidence levelStrong (multiple RCTs for BPD, self-harm, suicidality)Strong for BPD (Giesen-Bloo 2006); growing for other PDsModerate-strong across multiple conditionsStrong for recurrent depression relapse preventionGrowing; moderate evidence for shame-based presentations
Primary populationsBPD, suicidal/self-harming, emotion dysregulationPersonality disorders, chronic Axis I, treatment-resistantChronic pain, anxiety, depression, transdiagnosticRecurrent depression (3+ episodes)High shame, self-criticism, complex trauma
Exam Strategy

When comparing third-wave therapies, the key discriminating features are: (1) DBT = acceptance + change dialectic + skills training, (2) ST = childhood schemas + limited reparenting + experiential techniques, (3) ACT = psychological flexibility + defusion + values, (4) MBCT = mindfulness + relapse prevention for recurrent depression, (5) CFT = three emotion systems + compassion training for shame. If the question describes a patient with high shame who can think rationally but not feel it, the answer is CFT. If recurrent depression with rumination, MBCT. If chronic BPD with suicidality, DBT. If deep characterological patterns from childhood, ST.

Exam Pearl

All third-wave therapies share: (1) acceptance-based stance, (2) emphasis on process over content, (3) attention to the therapeutic relationship, (4) mindfulness (in varying degrees), (5) focus on function rather than form of behaviour. They differ in: theoretical basis, primary target population, specific techniques, and the role of mindfulness.

Clinical Anchor

In clinical practice, these therapies are often integrated rather than delivered in pure form. DBT skills are used in Schema Therapy as "temporary bridges" for self-harm and dissociation. ACT's defusion techniques complement CBT's cognitive restructuring. CFT's compassionate imagery can be incorporated into Schema Therapy's limited reparenting framework. The clinical skill is knowing which approach best fits the patient's presentation and phase of treatment.


References

  1. Arntz A, Jacob G. Schema Therapy in Practice. Wiley-Blackwell; 2013.
  2. Bamelis LLM, Evers SMAA, Spinhoven P, Arntz A. Results of a multicenter randomized controlled trial of the clinical effectiveness of schema therapy for personality disorders. Am J Psychiatry. 2014;171(3):305-322.
  3. Giesen-Bloo J, van Dyck R, Spinhoven P, et al. Outpatient psychotherapy for borderline personality disorder: randomized trial of schema-focused therapy vs transference-focused psychotherapy. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2006;63(6):649-658.
  4. Gilbert P. Compassion Focused Therapy: Distinctive Features. Routledge; 2010.
  5. Hayes SC. Acceptance and commitment therapy, relational frame theory, and the third wave of behavioral and cognitive therapies. Behav Ther. 2004;35(4):639-665.
  6. Hayes SC, Strosahl KD, Wilson KG. Acceptance and Commitment Therapy: The Process and Practice of Mindful Change. 2nd ed. Guilford Press; 2012.
  7. Kuyken W, Hayes R, Barrett B, et al. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of mindfulness-based cognitive therapy compared with maintenance antidepressant treatment in the prevention of depressive relapse or recurrence (PREVENT). Lancet. 2015;386(9988):63-73.
  8. Linehan MM. DBT Skills Training Manual. 2nd ed. Guilford Press; 2015.
  9. Linehan MM, Armstrong HE, Suarez A, Allmon D, Heard HL. Cognitive-behavioral treatment of chronically parasuicidal borderline patients. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1991;48(12):1060-1064.
  10. Mehlum L, Tormoen AJ, Ramberg M, et al. Dialectical behavior therapy for adolescents with repeated suicidal and self-harming behavior: a randomized trial. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2014;53(10):1082-1091.
  11. Rathus JH, Miller AL. DBT Skills Manual for Adolescents. Guilford Press; 2015.
  12. Segal ZV, Williams JMG, Teasdale JD. Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy for Depression. 2nd ed. Guilford Press; 2013.
  13. Teasdale JD, Segal ZV, Williams JMG, et al. Prevention of relapse/recurrence in major depression by mindfulness-based cognitive therapy. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2000;68(4):615-623.
  14. Young JE, Klosko JS, Weishaar ME. Schema Therapy: A Practitioner's Guide. Guilford Press; 2003.
www.weave.clinic wilfred.desouza1996@gmail.com IG: @weave.clinic
02
Clinical Quick Reference
Third-Wave Therapies — Weave Psychotherapy Vol. 6
www.weave.clinic
WEAVE Weave Psychotherapy Vol. 6 | Third-Wave Therapies Chapter 02 · Clinical Quick Reference

D6: Third-Wave Therapies — Quick Reference


1. Third-Wave Therapies at a Glance

WaveEraCore IdeaKey Therapies
First1950s-1970sModify observable behaviour via conditioningSystematic desensitisation, token economies, exposure
Second1970s-1990sIdentify and change distorted cognitionsCBT (Beck), REBT (Ellis)
Third1990s-presentChange relationship to thoughts; acceptance + mindfulness + valuesDBT, ST, ACT, MBCT, CFT, MCT, FAP, BA

Third-wave shared features: Acceptance over control, mindfulness, values-driven behaviour, therapeutic relationship as active ingredient, metacognition, contextual sensitivity.


2. DBT Skills Master Table

Core Mindfulness

SkillTypeDescription
Wise MindState of MindSynthesis of Emotional Mind and Reasonable Mind; intuitive knowing
Observe"What" SkillNotice experience without words; "Teflon mind"
Describe"What" SkillPut words on observations; stick to facts
Participate"What" SkillFully engage in activity; "in the zone"
Non-judgmentally"How" SkillNotice without evaluating as good/bad
One-mindfully"How" SkillDo one thing at a time
Effectively"How" SkillDo what works; let go of "right" vs. "wrong"

Distress Tolerance — Crisis Survival

SkillComponentsUse
TIPPTemperature (dive reflex), Intense exercise, Paced breathing, Progressive relaxationRed-zone rapid downregulation
STOPStop, Take a step back, Observe, Proceed mindfullyImpulse control before acting
ACCEPTSActivities, Contributing, Comparisons, Emotions, Pushing away, Thoughts, SensationsDistraction (done mindfully)
Self-SootheVision, Hearing, Touch, Smell, Taste, MovementSensory comfort
IMPROVEImagery, Meaning, Prayer, Relaxation, One thing, Vacation, EncouragementIn-the-moment coping
Pros and ConsWeigh acting on urge vs. using skills; label short-term/long-termCrisis decision-making

Distress Tolerance — Reality Acceptance

SkillCore Principle
Radical AcceptanceAccept reality as it is; Pain + Non-acceptance = Suffering
Turning the MindRepeated choice to accept; not one decision but ongoing practice
Willingness vs. WillfulnessWillingness = doing what is needed; Willfulness = refusing to engage
Half-SmileSubtle facial relaxation; behavioural cue for acceptance

Emotion Regulation

SkillDescription
ABC PLEASEAccumulate positives, Build mastery, Cope ahead + PhysicaL illness, Eating, Avoid substances, Sleep, Exercise
Check the FactsIs the emotion fitting the facts? Is the interpretation accurate?
Opposite ActionAct opposite to urge — all the way — when emotion does not fit facts
Problem SolvingWhen emotion fits facts, solve the problem systematically
The WaveObserve emotion as a wave; do not fight, do not hold; let it pass
Model of EmotionsVulnerability → Event → Interpretation → Response → Aftereffects

Opposite Action Quick Card:

EmotionUrgeOpposite
FearAvoidApproach; confront repeatedly
AngerAttackAvoid; approach with empathy
SadnessWithdrawGet active; engage
Shame (unjustified)HideGo public; stand tall
Shame (justified)HideAccept responsibility; repair
Guilt (justified)BegApologise once; make amends
Guilt (unjustified)Over-apologiseDo not apologise; let go
JealousyControlDo not act on it; engage elsewhere

Interpersonal Effectiveness

SkillGoalComponents
DEAR MANGet what you want / say noDescribe, Express, Assert, Reinforce, Mindful, Appear confident, Negotiate
GIVEMaintain relationshipGentle, Interested, Validate, Easy manner
FASTMaintain self-respectFair, no Apologies, Stick to values, Truthful
THINKReduce hostile attributions (adolescent)Think, Have empathy, Interpretations, Notice, Kindness

Walking the Middle Path (Adolescent DBT Only)

ComponentKey Points
Dialectics"Both/and" not "either/or"; find kernel of truth; no absolute truth
Validation6 levels; validate the valid, not the invalid
Behaviour ChangeReinforcement, shaping, extinction; expect behavioural burst

3. DBT Mnemonics Collection

MnemonicFull FormModule
DEAR MANDescribe, Express, Assert, Reinforce, Mindful, Appear confident, NegotiateIE
GIVEGentle, Interested, Validate, Easy mannerIE
FASTFair, no Apologies, Stick to values, TruthfulIE
THINKThink, Have empathy, Interpretations, Notice, KindnessIE (adolescent)
TIPPTemperature, Intense exercise, Paced breathing, Progressive relaxationDT
STOPStop, Take a step back, Observe, Proceed mindfullyDT
ACCEPTSActivities, Contributing, Comparisons, Emotions, Pushing away, Thoughts, SensationsDT
IMPROVEImagery, Meaning, Prayer, Relaxation, One thing, Vacation, EncouragementDT
ABC PLEASEAccumulate positives, Build mastery, Cope ahead, PhysicaL illness, Eating, Avoid substances, Sleep, ExerciseER
WAVE(metaphor — emotion as wave)ER

Module key: IE = Interpersonal Effectiveness, DT = Distress Tolerance, ER = Emotion Regulation


4. Schema Therapy — 18 EMSs Table

#DomainSchemaCore Belief
1I. Disconnection & RejectionAbandonment/Instability"People I love will leave or be unpredictable"
2Mistrust/Abuse"Others will hurt, exploit, or betray me"
3Emotional Deprivation"My emotional needs will never be met"
4Defectiveness/Shame"I am fundamentally flawed and unlovable"
5Social Isolation"I don't belong; I am different"
6II. Impaired AutonomyDependence/Incompetence"I cannot handle life without help"
7Vulnerability to Harm"Catastrophe is imminent and unpreventable"
8Enmeshment"I have no identity apart from others"
9Failure"I am stupid, inept, and will always fail"
10III. Impaired LimitsEntitlement/Grandiosity"I am superior; rules don't apply to me"
11Insufficient Self-Control"I cannot tolerate frustration or control impulses"
12IV. Other-DirectednessSubjugation"I must submit or face punishment/abandonment"
13Self-Sacrifice"I must meet others' needs at my expense"
14Approval-Seeking"I need approval to feel worthy"
15V. Overvigilance & InhibitionNegativity/Pessimism"Things will go wrong"
16Emotional Inhibition"I must suppress emotions"
17Unrelenting Standards"I must be perfect"
18Punitiveness"Mistakes deserve harsh punishment"

Domain distribution: 5-4-2-3-4

Five core emotional needs: (1) Secure attachment, (2) Autonomy and competence, (3) Freedom to express needs/emotions, (4) Spontaneity and play, (5) Realistic limits and self-control

Three coping styles: Surrender (Freeze)Avoidance (Flight)Overcompensation (Fight)

5. Schema Modes Table

Young (2003) — Original 10 Modes

CategoryMode
ChildVulnerable Child, Angry Child, Impulsive/Undisciplined Child, Happy Child
CopingCompliant Surrenderer, Detached Protector, Overcompensator
ParentPunitive Parent, Demanding Parent
HealthyHealthy Adult

Arntz & Jacob (2013) — Expanded 18+ Modes

CategoryModes
Child — VulnerabilityLonely, Abandoned/abused, Humiliated/inferior, Dependent
Child — AngerAngry, Obstinate, Enraged
Child — DisciplineImpulsive, Undisciplined
ParentPunitive, Demanding
Coping — SurrenderCompliant surrender
Coping — AvoidanceDetached protector, Avoidant protector, Angry protector, Detached self-soother
Coping — OvercompensationSelf-aggrandiser, Attention-seeker, Perfectionistic overcontroller, Paranoid overcontroller, Bully & attack, Conning/manipulative, Predator
HealthyHappy child, Healthy adult

BPD Mode Model (4 core modes)

  1. Abandoned/abused child (abandonment fear, helplessness)
  2. Angry/impulsive child (rage, impulsive need fulfilment)
  3. Punitive parent (extreme self-hatred — the signature BPD mode)
  4. Detached protector (emotional shutdown, dissociation)

NPD Mode Model (3 core modes)

  1. Lonely child (Emotional Deprivation + Defectiveness)
  2. Self-aggrandiser (Entitlement as overcompensation)
  3. Detached self-soother (avoidance through addictive/compulsive activities)

6. ACT Hexaflex Quick Card

ProcessInflexible PoleFlexible PoleIn One Sentence
AcceptanceExperiential avoidanceAcceptanceHave unwanted experiences without trying to escape them
DefusionCognitive fusionDefusionSee thoughts as thoughts, not as facts
Present MomentPast/future dominancePresent awarenessFlexible attention to the here-and-now
Self-as-ContextConceptualised selfObserving self"I am the sky, not the weather"
ValuesLack of clarityChosen directionsWhat truly matters across life domains
Committed ActionInaction/avoidanceValues-consistent actionConcrete behaviours serving values

Two overarching clusters:

Key ACT techniques: Creative hopelessness, defusion exercises ("I'm having the thought that..."), values clarification, committed action patterns, "leaves on a stream" exercise.

Core distinction from CBT: ACT does not aim to change thought content. It aims to change the relationship to thoughts. Symptom reduction is a byproduct, not a goal.


7. MBCT Session Structure

SessionThemeKey Practice
1Automatic pilotRaisin exercise; body scan
2Dealing with barriersBody scan; wandering mind
3Mindfulness of breathSitting meditation; 3-minute breathing space
4Staying presentBreath + body meditation; "thoughts are not facts"
5Allowing/letting beSounds and thoughts meditation; working with aversion
6Thoughts are not factsChoiceless awareness; alternative viewpoints
7Self-careNourishing vs. depleting activities; relapse signature; action plan
8Maintaining practiceReview; body scan; relapse prevention plan

3-Minute Breathing Space:

Mechanism: Doing mode (discrepancy monitoring → rumination) → Being mode (present-focused acceptance)

Indication: Relapse prevention for recurrent depression (3+ episodes). NOT for acute depression. No benefit for 1-2 episodes.


8. Comparison: All Third-Wave Therapies

DimensionDBTSchema TherapyACTMBCTCFT
FounderLinehanYoungHayesSegal/Williams/TeasdaleGilbert
Year19931990/2003199920022005
Core conceptAcceptance + changeEMSs + modesPsychological flexibilityMindful awareness vs. relapseCompassion vs. shame
Primary targetBPD, suicidalityPersonality disordersExperiential avoidanceRecurrent depressionHigh shame, self-criticism
Theory baseBiosocial + dialecticsAttachment + unmet needsRFTDifferential activationEvolutionary psychology
Format4 modes (individual + group + phone + consult)Individual (1-2x/week)Individual or group8-session groupIndividual or group
Duration1 year (24 weeks adolescent)1-3 years8-16 sessions8 weeks12-20 sessions
RelationshipDialectical: validate + pushLimited reparenting + empathic confrontationModels flexibilityGroup facilitatorModels compassion
MindfulnessCore moduleNot central1 of 6 processesCentral/definingEmbedded
EvidenceStrong (BPD, self-harm)Strong (BPD); growing (other PDs)Moderate-strong (transdiagnostic)Strong (recurrent depression)Growing
Key techniqueSkills + chain analysis + diary cardIR + chair work + flash cardsDefusion + values + committed actionMeditation + 3-min breathingCompassionate imagery

9. Evidence Snapshot

TherapyLandmark StudyKey Finding
DBTLinehan et al. (1991) Arch Gen PsychiatryFirst RCT: DBT superior to TAU for BPD; fewer suicide attempts, less self-harm
DBTLinehan et al. (2006)DBT halved suicide attempts vs. community experts
DBT (adolescent)Mehlum et al. (2014) JAACAPAdolescent DBT superior to enhanced usual care for self-harm
STGiesen-Bloo et al. (2006) Arch Gen PsychiatryST superior to TFP for BPD; higher recovery, lower dropout
STNadort et al. (2009)No benefit from crisis phone support; removed from protocol
STBamelis et al. (2014) Am J PsychiatryST effective for Cluster C PDs and paranoid PD
ACTA-Tjak et al. (2015) Behav Res TherMeta-analysis: ACT superior to controls, comparable to CBT
MBCTTeasdale et al. (2000) JCCPMBCT reduced relapse 44% for 3+ episodes; no benefit for 1-2
MBCTKuyken et al. (2015) LancetMBCT non-inferior to maintenance antidepressants
CFTGilbert (2010, 2014)Growing RCT evidence for shame-based presentations

Medication interaction: Giesen-Bloo et al. (2006) — sedatives/benzodiazepines significantly reduced ST effectiveness in BPD (blocks emotional processing needed for IR).


10. Viva Questions

Q1. What distinguishes third-wave therapies from second-wave CBT?

Third-wave therapies change the patient's relationship to thoughts rather than the content of thoughts. They emphasise acceptance over control, incorporate mindfulness, attend to values and meaning, use the therapeutic relationship as an active change mechanism, and work at the metacognitive or process level. Second-wave CBT focuses on identifying and modifying distorted cognitions through logical analysis and behavioural experiments.

Q2. Describe the biosocial model in DBT.

Chronic emotional dysregulation arises from a transactional interaction between biological vulnerability (high sensitivity, high reactivity, slow return to baseline) and a pervasively invalidating environment (punishing emotions, reinforcing only extremes, oversimplifying solutions). The model is transactional — the child's sensitivity shapes the environment's response and vice versa, creating escalating cycles. The model is de-shaming: problems are not the patient's fault, but they are their responsibility.

Q3. What is the DBT target hierarchy and why does it matter?

In Stage 1 individual therapy: (1) life-threatening behaviours, (2) therapy-interfering behaviours, (3) quality-of-life-interfering behaviours, (4) increasing skills. The hierarchy is absolute — if suicidal behaviour occurred this week, it is addressed before everything else, regardless of what the patient wants to discuss. This prevents avoidance of lethal risk and ensures systematic progress.

Q4. Name all six DBT validation levels.

(1) Unbiased listening, (2) Accurate reflection, (3) Mind-reading (articulating unspoken experiences), (4) Validation by past history, (5) Validation by current context (the heart of DBT validation — normalising the response), (6) Radical genuineness (treating the person as a capable equal). Level 5 is the most important clinically; Level 6 is the highest and most challenging.

Q5. List the 5 schema domains and give one schema from each.

(1) Disconnection & Rejection — e.g., Abandonment; (2) Impaired Autonomy & Performance — e.g., Dependence/Incompetence; (3) Impaired Limits — e.g., Entitlement; (4) Other-Directedness — e.g., Self-Sacrifice; (5) Overvigilance & Inhibition — e.g., Unrelenting Standards. Distribution: 5-4-2-3-4 schemas per domain.

Q6. Explain the difference between schemas and modes in Schema Therapy.

Schemas are traits — stable, pervasive patterns of memories, emotions, cognitions, and bodily sensations. Modes are states — the moment-to-moment emotional states and coping responses currently active. A patient may have the Abandonment schema as a trait but fluctuate between the Vulnerable Child mode, Detached Protector mode, and Angry Child mode depending on the situation. Modes are more directly accessible in session and more directly targetable.

Q7. What is imagery rescripting and how does it differ from exposure therapy?

In imagery rescripting, the patient accesses a childhood memory via an affect bridge, then a helping figure (therapist, third party, or patient's own healthy adult) enters the scene and changes the outcome — protecting the child, confronting the perpetrator, meeting unmet needs. Unlike exposure therapy, the patient does NOT relive the full trauma. They contact the emotion just enough to activate the memory, then the memory is actively rescripted. Arntz et al. (2007) showed IR was superior to imaginal exposure on guilt, shame, and anger in PTSD.

Q8. Describe the ACT hexaflex and its six processes.

The hexaflex represents six processes that interact to produce psychological flexibility: (1) Acceptance — willingness to have unwanted experiences, (2) Cognitive defusion — seeing thoughts as mental events rather than truths, (3) Present-moment awareness — flexible attention to the here-and-now, (4) Self-as-context — the observing self ("the sky, not the weather"), (5) Values — chosen life directions, (6) Committed action — concrete behaviours serving values. Two clusters: mindfulness/acceptance (processes 1-4) and commitment/change (processes 5-6).

Q9. Why does MBCT only work for patients with 3+ depressive episodes?

MBCT targets the differential activation cascade: in patients with 3+ episodes, mild dysphoria can reactivate the full depressive cognitive package (negative thoughts, rumination, hopelessness) through associative memory networks. After multiple episodes, the threshold for reactivation drops so low that normal sadness triggers relapse. MBCT trains patients to notice early warning signs and shift from "doing mode" (rumination) to "being mode" (acceptance). In patients with 1-2 episodes, relapse is driven more by life events than cognitive reactivation, so the mechanism MBCT targets is not yet established.

Q10. What are the three emotion regulation systems in CFT?

(1) Threat/Protection system — detects and responds to danger; produces anxiety, anger, shame; driven by amygdala and HPA axis. (2) Drive/Resource-seeking system — pursues goals and rewards; produces excitement, anticipation; driven by dopamine. (3) Soothing/Affiliation system — calms and connects; produces contentment, safety; driven by oxytocin and vagal tone. In patients with high shame, the soothing system is underdeveloped while the threat system is overactive. CFT builds the soothing system through compassionate imagery and compassionate mind training.

Q11. Compare the therapeutic relationship across DBT, ST, and ACT.

DBT: dialectical — the therapist balances validation (acceptance) with problem-solving (change); warm but also irreverent; consultation team prevents burnout. ST: limited reparenting — the therapist provides within boundaries what the patient needed from parents (warmth for deprivation, stability for abandonment, limits for entitlement) + empathic confrontation. ACT: the therapist models psychological flexibility; therapist willingness to be present with the patient's pain without trying to fix it; relationship is functional rather than corrective.

Q12. A patient with BPD is being considered for psychotherapy. Compare how DBT and Schema Therapy would each approach the case.

DBT: Biosocial formulation; Stage 1 targets (safety first); individual therapy + skills group + phone coaching + consult team; diary card; chain analysis for self-harm; TIPP for crisis; opposite action for shame; DEAR MAN for interpersonal needs; 1-year commitment. ST: Mode formulation (abandoned child, angry child, punitive parent, detached protector); limited reparenting to build trust (Phase 1, up to 1 year on coping modes); imagery rescripting for childhood trauma (Phase 2); chair work against punitive parent; transfer of healthy adult role (Phase 3); 2-3 years, 2x/week. Key difference: DBT prioritises behavioural stabilisation and skills; ST prioritises emotional processing and schema healing. In practice, DBT skills are often used as a "bridge" in early ST when self-harm or dissociation is present.

www.weave.clinic wilfred.desouza1996@gmail.com IG: @weave.clinic
WEAVE
Centre for Integrative Psychiatry
Psychiatry that listens before it prescribes.
Website
www.weave.clinic
Instagram
@weave.clinic · @doc.wilfred.md · @doc.niharika.md
Email
Two doctors. Two approaches. One practice.
ADHD · Relationships · Mood · Addiction · Children
Online across India