Pharmacology Recent Advances
Paper IV · Neurology, Medicine & Recent Advances. Six study modes, from notes to quick review.
Jump to a section
Study Notes
Comprehensive Study Notes
SECTION 1: NEWER ANTIDEPRESSANTS
1.1 Vortioxetine (Multimodal Antidepressant)
Class: Serotonin modulator and stimulator (SMS)
Brand: Trintellix
Approved: FDA 2013 for Major Depressive Disorder (MDD)
Mechanism of Action: The Multimodal Profile
Vortioxetine is unique because it acts at multiple serotonin receptor subtypes simultaneously, not just as a reuptake inhibitor.
| Target | Action | Effect |
|---|---|---|
| SERT | Inhibition | Increases synaptic serotonin |
| 5-HT1A | Agonist | Autoreceptor desensitization, anxiolysis |
| 5-HT1B | Partial agonist | Modulates serotonin release |
| 5-HT3 | Antagonist | Reduces nausea, enhances ACh/NE/DA/GABA |
| 5-HT7 | Antagonist | Circadian rhythm modulation, cognitive effects |
| 5-HT1D | Antagonist | Modulates serotonin/NE release |
Key exam point: The 5-HT3 antagonism is why vortioxetine has fewer GI side effects and may enhance cognitive function (5-HT3 blockade increases ACh in frontal cortex).
Pharmacokinetics
- Oral bioavailability: ~75%
- Protein binding: >98%
- Metabolism: CYP2D6 primary; also CYP3A4/5, CYP2C19
- Half-life: ~66 hours (allows once-daily dosing)
- Dose: 5–20 mg/day
- No dose adjustment for renal impairment; caution in hepatic impairment
Clinical Evidence
- FOCUS trial and CONNECT trial: Demonstrated cognitive benefits beyond mood improvement
- Meta-analyses show moderate superiority over placebo on MADRS
- Cognitive benefits (processing speed, executive function) shown in multiple RCTs
- VORTEX study: Comparable efficacy to duloxetine with better tolerability
Distinguishing Features
- Cognitive benefits, superior to placebo and comparable/better than other ADs on neurocognition
- Sexual dysfunction, significantly lower rates than SSRIs/SNRIs (~25% vs ~60%)
- Weight neutral, minimal weight gain
- No significant QTc prolongation
- No discontinuation syndrome (long half-life)
Side Effects
- Nausea (most common, dose-dependent), usually transient
- Constipation, vomiting
- Vivid dreams at higher doses
- Pruritus (itching), unique to vortioxetine, mechanism unclear
Dose Titration Strategy
- Start 5–10 mg/day
- Increase to 20 mg after 2–4 weeks if tolerated
- CYP2D6 poor metabolizers: max 10 mg/day
- Strong CYP2D6 inhibitors (paroxetine, fluoxetine): halve the dose
1.2 Vilazodone
Class: Serotonin partial agonist and reuptake inhibitor (SPARI)
Brand: Viibryd
Approved: FDA 2011 for MDD
Mechanism
- SERT inhibitor (like SSRIs)
- 5-HT1A partial agonist (like buspirone)
- The 5-HT1A partial agonism may explain faster onset and reduced anxiety/insomnia at initiation
Pharmacokinetics
- Must be taken with food (bioavailability increases 147–160% with food)
- Half-life: ~25 hours
- CYP3A4 metabolism
- Dose: 10 mg x 7 days → 20 mg x 7 days → 40 mg maintenance
Clinical Profile
- Comparable efficacy to SSRIs on HAMD-17 and MADRS
- Lower rates of sexual dysfunction compared to SSRIs
- Lower rates of weight gain
- Nausea and diarrhea common (GI adverse effects)
Key Differentiator from Vortioxetine
- Vilazodone: SPARI (SERT + 5-HT1A partial agonist)
- Vortioxetine: SMS (SERT + multiple 5-HT receptor modulation)
- Vilazodone has NO 5-HT3 antagonism, 5-HT7 antagonism
- Vilazodone REQUIRES food for absorption
1.3 Esketamine / Intranasal Ketamine
Background
Ketamine (a racemic mixture) has been used off-label for treatment-resistant depression (TRD) since ~2000. Esketamine is the S-enantiomer, more potent at NMDA receptors.
Brand: Spravato (intranasal esketamine)
FDA Approval: 2019 for TRD; 2020 for MDD with acute suicidal ideation or behavior (MDSI)
Mechanism of Action
Primary: NMDA (N-methyl-D-aspartate) receptor antagonism
- Blocks glutamate binding at NMDA receptors
- Rapid disinhibition of downstream glutamatergic activity
- Surge of AMPA receptor activation → BDNF release → synaptic plastogenesis
The AMPA surge hypothesis:
Additional mechanisms:
- Opioid receptor modulation (controversial, recent data suggests partial role)
- GABA-A modulation
- HCN1 channel blockade (explains analgesic effects)
REMS (Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy)
Critical exam fact: Esketamine has a REMS program, one of few psychiatric drugs requiring this.
REMS requirements:
- Only dispensed in certified healthcare settings, not at pharmacy
- Patient must be monitored for 2 hours after each administration
- Monitoring for: dissociation, sedation, blood pressure changes, abuse
- Patient cannot drive on day of administration
- Healthcare setting must enroll in REMS program
- ETASU (Elements To Assure Safe Use) components
Administration Protocol
- Intranasal delivery (84 mg device = 2 devices × 28 mg each)
- Doses: 56 mg or 84 mg
- Induction phase: Twice weekly for 4 weeks
- Maintenance phase 1: Once weekly for 4 weeks
- Maintenance phase 2: Once weekly or every 2 weeks
Clinical Evidence
- TRANSFORM-2 trial: Significant improvement in MADRS vs placebo intranasal + standard-of-care AD
- SUSTAIN-1 trial: Maintenance of remission, reduced relapse rates
- Onset of action: Within hours to days (vs weeks for conventional ADs)
Side Effects
Contraindications
- Aneurysmal vascular disease (risk of BP spikes)
- Arteriovenous malformation
- History of intracerebral hemorrhage
- Current psychosis (worsens dissociation)
- Hypersensitivity to ketamine/esketamine
Ketamine vs Esketamine
| Feature | Racemic Ketamine IV | Esketamine Intranasal |
|---|---|---|
| Route | IV infusion | Intranasal |
| FDA approval | No (off-label) | Yes (TRD, MDSI) |
| REMS | No | Yes |
| Setting | Ketamine clinics | Certified settings |
| Cost | Lower | Higher |
| Evidence | Extensive, replicated | RCTs available |
| Bioavailability | ~100% (IV) | ~48% (intranasal) |
1.4 Brexanolone (Postpartum Depression)
Brand: Zulresso
FDA Approval: 2019, first drug specifically approved for postpartum depression (PPD)
Class: Neuroactive steroid / GABA-A receptor positive allosteric modulator (PAM)
Mechanism
The peripartum hormone crash:
- During pregnancy: allopregnanolone (progesterone metabolite) levels rise dramatically
- After delivery: abrupt fall → triggers PPD in vulnerable individuals
- Brexanolone = synthetic allopregnanolone
Mechanism: Positive allosteric modulation of both synaptic and extrasynaptic GABA-A receptors
- Synaptic GABA-A (γ2-containing): phasic inhibition
- Extrasynaptic GABA-A (δ-containing): tonic inhibition, critical for brexanolone's unique mechanism
Clinical Features
- Continuous IV infusion over 60 hours (2.5 days)
- Administered in certified healthcare facility (REMS program)
- Rapid onset: significant improvement within 24–48 hours
- Sustained effect: response maintained at 30-day follow-up
REMS Program
- Risk of excessive sedation and sudden loss of consciousness
- Monitor oxygen saturation continuously
- Patient must be accompanied home
Limitations
- IV only, impractical for widespread use
- Cost: ~$34,000 per treatment course
- Zuranolone (oral formulation) now available, FDA approved 2023, first oral neuroactive steroid for MDD and PPD
Zuranolone (Zurzuvae):
- Oral, 30 mg or 50 mg nightly for 14 days
- Same GABA-A PAM mechanism
- Does NOT require REMS
- First oral neuroactive steroid approved
1.5 Dextromethorphan-Bupropion (Auvelity)
Brand: Auvelity
FDA Approval: 2022 for MDD, first new MDD mechanism in decades
Components
- Dextromethorphan (DXM): Uncompetitive NMDA antagonist + sigma-1 receptor agonist
- Bupropion: CYP2D6 inhibitor (increases DXM levels) + NDRI
Why the Combination?
- Dextromethorphan alone is rapidly metabolized by CYP2D6 (extensive metabolizers)
- Bupropion inhibits CYP2D6 → increases DXM levels 8-fold → therapeutic concentrations achieved
- Bupropion also contributes antidepressant activity independently
Mechanism
- NMDA antagonism → similar to ketamine pathway (AMPA surge, BDNF, synaptogenesis)
- Sigma-1 agonism → neuroprotection, neuroplasticity
- NDRI component → dopaminergic/noradrenergic antidepressant effect
Clinical Evidence
- GEMINI trial: 45 mg/105 mg twice daily significantly improved HAMD-17 at week 6 vs placebo
- Faster onset than typical ADs (significant benefit by week 1)
- Response rates: ~54% vs ~34% placebo
Dosing
- Start: 45 mg DXM/105 mg bupropion once daily for 3 days
- Increase to twice daily thereafter
Side Effects
- Dizziness, headache, diarrhea, somnolence
- Risk of dissociation (lower than esketamine)
- No REMS required
- Abuse potential of DXM, schedule uncontrolled currently
1.6 Gepirone (Exxua)
Class: 5-HT1A partial agonist (azapirone, like buspirone)
FDA Approval: 2023 for MDD (after multiple prior rejections)
Mechanism
- Selective 5-HT1A partial agonist, no SERT inhibition
- Pre-synaptic autoreceptor agonism → anxiolytic
- Post-synaptic 5-HT1A agonism → antidepressant
Key Features
- No sexual dysfunction
- No weight gain
- No discontinuation syndrome
- Extended-release formulation, once daily
- Absence of significant drug interactions compared to SSRIs
Clinical Evidence
- Multiple trials showing efficacy in MDD
- Delayed approval due to concerns about effect size consistency
- Approved for patients who require antidepressant therapy without sexual side effects
SECTION 2: NEWER ANTIPSYCHOTICS
2.1 Lumateperone (Caplyta)
FDA Approval: 2019 for schizophrenia; 2021 for bipolar depression (both I and II)
Mechanism: Truly novel, simultaneous modulator of dopamine, serotonin, and glutamate
Mechanism of Action
The key novelty: Lumateperone acts at D1 as a stimulator (unlike typical/atypical APs that block D1) and simultaneously modulates glutamate via NMDA NR2B subunit. This may explain the cognitive-sparing and mood-stabilizing properties.
Pharmacokinetics
- Dose: 42 mg once daily (at bedtime with or without food)
- Half-life: ~18 hours
- CYP3A4 primary metabolism
- No dose titration required
Clinical Profile
- Minimal weight gain, weight-neutral in trials
- Minimal metabolic effects, no significant glucose/lipid changes
- Low EPS, very low extrapyramidal burden
- Low sedation at therapeutic doses
- Prolactin-sparing, does not raise prolactin
Unique Indication: Bipolar Depression
- One of few antipsychotics with evidence for BOTH schizophrenia AND bipolar depression
- Effective in bipolar I and bipolar II depression (most drugs only approved for bipolar I)
2.2 Pimavanserin (Nuplazid)
FDA Approval: 2016, first drug approved specifically for Parkinson's Disease Psychosis (PDP)
Class: 5-HT2A inverse agonist/antagonist; 5-HT2C inverse agonist
Why Pimavanserin for PDP?
Traditional antipsychotics block D2 receptors. In Parkinson's, dopaminergic pathways are already depleted, D2 blockade worsens motor symptoms catastrophically.
Pimavanserin:
- No D2 binding, does not worsen motor symptoms
- Selective 5-HT2A/2C inverse agonism, reduces psychotic symptoms via serotonergic pathway
Mechanism
- Inverse agonist at 5-HT2A, constitutively active receptors are silenced even without serotonin
- Different from antagonist: reduces basal activity below baseline, not just blocks incoming signal
Clinical Evidence
- ACP-103-020 trial: Significant reduction in SAPS-PD (Scale for Assessment of Positive Symptoms in PDP)
- Improved neuropsychiatric inventory (NPI) scores
- No worsening of UPDRS motor scores
Limitations and Safety
- FDA Black Box Warning: Increased mortality in elderly with dementia-related psychosis
- QTc prolongation, avoid with other QTc-prolonging agents
- Dose: 34 mg once daily
- No dose titration required
Extended Use
- Investigated for Alzheimer's Disease Agitation (ADVANCE trial, negative primary endpoint but secondary benefits)
- Combination with citalopram studied for dementia-related psychosis
2.3 Cariprazine (Reagila/Vraylar)
FDA Approval: 2015 for schizophrenia and bipolar I disorder (mania and depression)
Class: Partial agonist at D2, D3, and 5-HT1A; antagonist at 5-HT2A, 5-HT2B
The D3 Distinction
This is the defining feature of cariprazine.
| Drug | D2 | D3 |
|---|---|---|
| Aripiprazole | Partial agonist | Partial agonist (less selective) |
| Brexpiprazole | Partial agonist | Less selective |
| Cariprazine | Partial agonist | High-affinity partial agonist (20x selectivity for D3 over D2) |
Why does D3 matter?
- D3 receptors are concentrated in: mesolimbic system, prefrontal cortex, hippocampus
- D3 modulation → improved negative symptoms of schizophrenia
- D3 involved in reward processing, motivation, cognition
- Cariprazine's D3 selectivity is the proposed mechanism for its unique efficacy on negative symptoms
Clinical Evidence
Negative symptoms:
- PANSS-ND (negative symptoms subscale) improved vs risperidone in RCTs
- Statistically significant superiority to risperidone on PANSS negative symptom factor scores
- RGH-MD-16 study: Cariprazine 3–6 mg vs risperidone, negative symptom advantage confirmed
Bipolar depression:
- Multiple RCTs showing efficacy on MADRS
- Unique among antipsychotics: efficacious at LOW doses (1.5 mg) for bipolar depression vs higher doses for mania
Pharmacokinetics
- Active metabolite: DCAR (desmethyl-cariprazine) with similar pharmacology
- Active metabolite: DDCAR (didesmethyl-cariprazine), very long half-life (~1–3 weeks)
- Total effective half-life: 2–4 weeks
- Implication: After discontinuation, pharmacological effect persists for weeks
Dosing
- Schizophrenia: 1.5–6 mg/day
- Bipolar mania: 3–6 mg/day
- Bipolar depression: 1.5–3 mg/day (lower than mania)
Side Effects
- Akathisia, highest among newer APs
- Weight gain, moderate (less than olanzapine/clozapine)
- Metabolic: moderate
- Minimal prolactin elevation (partial agonist)
2.4 Brexpiprazole (Rexulti)
FDA Approval: 2015 for schizophrenia and adjunctive treatment of MDD
2023 Approval: Agitation associated with Alzheimer's dementia (first drug for this indication)
Class: Serotonin-dopamine activity modulator (SDAM)
Mechanism
Key comparison with aripiprazole:
- Brexpiprazole: LOWER intrinsic activity at D2 (more antagonist-like behavior)
- Lower risk of akathisia than aripiprazole
- More potent 5-HT1A partial agonism
Alzheimer's Dementia Agitation
- RAISE trial: Brexpiprazole 2–3 mg significantly reduced CMAI agitation scores
- First FDA approval specifically for this indication
- Important caveat: Still carries dementia-related mortality warning
Adjunctive MDD
- Add-on to SSRI/SNRI in partial responders
- Doses: 1–3 mg/day (lower than for schizophrenia)
2.5 Long-Acting Injectable Antipsychotics (LAIs)
Why LAIs Matter
- Non-adherence is the #1 cause of relapse in schizophrenia
- ~50% of patients are non-adherent within 1 year of discharge
- LAIs bypass the daily decision to take medication
- Eliminates covert non-adherence
- Continuous therapeutic blood levels without peaks/troughs
Paliperidone Palmitate 3-Monthly (PP3M / Invega Trinza)
| Feature | PP1M (Trinza monthly) | PP3M (Trinza 3-monthly) |
|---|---|---|
| Injection frequency | Monthly | Every 3 months |
| Formulation | Nanocrystal suspension | Nanocrystal suspension |
| Loading dose required | Yes (Days 1 and 8) | No (after stable on PP1M) |
| First injection site | Deltoid | Deltoid or gluteal |
| Dosing flexibility | 39–234 mg | 175–525 mg |
PP3M requirements:
- Must be adequately treated with PP1M for at least 4 months
- Last two PP1M doses must be same dose (stable)
- PP3M dose = 3.5x the PP1M dose
Paliperidone palmitate 6-monthly (PP6M / Invega Hafyera):
- FDA approved 2021
- Every 6 months injection
- Gluteal only
Aripiprazole Lauroxil (Aristada)
Initiation strategy (NCD, No Confirmation Day):
- Aristada Initio 675 mg (deltoid) + oral aripiprazole 30 mg on same day
- Followed by regular Aristada the next day
- Avoids the 21-day wait for oral overlap
SECTION 3: NEWER ANXIOLYTICS AND HYPNOTICS
3.1 Orexin Receptor Antagonists (DORAs)
The Orexin System
Orexins (hypocretins 1 and 2) are neuropeptides produced in the lateral hypothalamus. They are wake-promoting neurotransmitters.
DORA mechanism: Block both OX1R and OX2R simultaneously → "turn off" the wake drive → natural sleep architecture preserved
Contrast with older hypnotics:
- Benzodiazepines and Z-drugs: enhance GABA inhibition (suppress all brain activity)
- DORAs: specifically suppress wake-promoting drive only
Suvorexant (Belsomra)
FDA Approval: 2014
Doses: 5, 10, 15, 20 mg (usual: 10–20 mg)
Schedule: Schedule IV controlled substance
Mechanism: Dual OX1R + OX2R antagonist
Clinical Profile:
- Reduces sleep onset latency and wake after sleep onset (WASO)
- Preserves sleep architecture (REM, SWS proportions maintained)
- Less residual sedation than benzodiazepines
- No rebound insomnia upon discontinuation (key differentiator)
Side Effects:
- Somnolence, abnormal dreams
- Sleep paralysis, hypnagogic/hypnopompic hallucinations
- Cataplexy-like symptoms (rare, dose-dependent)
- Next-day impairment, warn about driving
Drug Interactions:
- Strong CYP3A4 inhibitors: reduce dose to 5 mg (ketoconazole, clarithromycin)
- CYP3A4 inducers: reduce efficacy (rifampin, carbamazepine)
Lemborexant (Dayvigo)
FDA Approval: 2019
Doses: 5 mg and 10 mg
Differences from suvorexant:
- Higher binding affinity at OX2R (more selective wake-off switch)
- Longer half-life: ~17–27 hours (suvorexant ~12 hours)
- Better sleep maintenance data in elderly
- SUNRISE-1 and SUNRISE-2 trials vs placebo + SUNRISE-2 vs zolpidem
- Lemborexant 5 mg showed better subjective sleep parameters than zolpidem at 1 month
Side Effects:
- Similar to suvorexant
- Somnolence, headache
- Caution: complex sleep behaviors (sleepwalking, sleep driving), black box warning added for all Z-drugs and now DORAs
Daridorexant (Quviviq)
FDA Approval: 2022
Doses: 25 mg and 50 mg
Key features:
- Shortest half-life among approved DORAs (~8 hours)
- Least next-day sedation, specifically designed for daytime functioning
- ESADA-1 and ESADA-2 trials: Improved subjective and objective sleep parameters + daytime functioning scores
- No dose adjustment for CYP3A4 interactions at approved doses (unlike suvorexant)
| Feature | Suvorexant | Lemborexant | Daridorexant |
|---|---|---|---|
| Approval | 2014 | 2019 | 2022 |
| Half-life | ~12h | ~17–27h | ~8h |
| Doses | 10–20 mg | 5–10 mg | 25–50 mg |
| Schedule | IV | IV | IV |
| Best for | General insomnia | Elderly/maintenance | Next-day functioning |
SECTION 4: PSYCHEDELICS IN PSYCHIATRY
4.1 Psilocybin
Source: Psilocybe cubensis and related mushrooms
Active metabolite: Psilocin (after dephosphorylation by alkaline phosphatase)
Mechanism of Action
- Primary: 5-HT2A agonist, binding in prefrontal cortex, thalamus, limbic system
- Secondary: 5-HT2C, 5-HT1A activity
- No direct effects on dopamine system
Neural effects of 5-HT2A agonism:
- Disruption of thalamo-cortical gating → enhanced sensory processing → hallucinations
- Default Mode Network (DMN) disruption → ego dissolution
- Increased global brain connectivity, "hyperconnected" brain state
- Neuroplasticity induction via BDNF and mTOR pathways
Clinical Trials
Treatment-Resistant Depression (TRD):
- COMPASS Pathways Phase 2b (COMP360):
- 25 mg psilocybin (single dose) → significant response at 3 weeks
- Rapid, sustained antidepressant effect
- ~29% remission at 3 weeks with 25 mg dose
- Adverse effects: headache, nausea, dizziness, transient anxiety during session
Major Depression:
- Johns Hopkins study (2021, JAMA Psychiatry):
- 2 sessions of psilocybin (20 mg + 30 mg, 1 week apart)
- ~71% response, ~54% remission at 4 weeks
- Maintained at 1-year follow-up
Existential Distress (Cancer):
- NYU and Johns Hopkins trials (2016):
- Single-dose psilocybin in cancer patients with anxiety/depression
- Dramatic, sustained reductions in existential distress
- ~60–80% meeting criteria for clinically significant antidepressant response at 6 months
Alcohol and Smoking Cessation:
- Pilot studies showing promise, larger RCTs ongoing
Regulatory Status
- Schedule I in US, India, no accepted medical use currently
- FDA granted Breakthrough Therapy Designation for:
- Psilocybin for TRD (COMPASS Pathways, 2018)
- Psilocybin for MDD (Usona Institute, 2019)
- Australia: ARTG approved psilocybin for TRD (July 2023), first country to reschedule for medical use
Set and Setting
- Therapeutic psilocybin is not standalone, it is psilocybin-assisted psychotherapy
- Preparation sessions (psychotherapy)
- Drug sessions (monitored, therapist present)
- Integration sessions (processing experience)
- Physical environment matters: comfortable room, music, eye shades
Safety Profile
- Non-addictive, no withdrawal syndrome, no physical dependence
- Low abuse potential (tolerance develops rapidly to self-limiting)
- Transient adverse effects: headache, nausea, transient anxiety, confusion
- Serious risks: Challenging experiences ("bad trips"), managed with therapist presence
- Contraindications: Personal/family history of psychosis, schizophrenia, bipolar I (manic episodes), unstable cardiovascular disease
- HPPD (Hallucinogen Persisting Perception Disorder), rare
4.2 MDMA-Assisted Therapy for PTSD
Full name: 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine
Schedule I (US), Breakthrough Therapy Designation (2017) for PTSD
Mechanism of Action
- Primary: Releases serotonin (massive), dopamine, and norepinephrine from presynaptic terminals
- Inhibits reuptake of all three monoamines
- Oxytocin release, social bonding hormone
- Net effect: Empathic, prosocial state with reduced fear response
Why MDMA is uniquely suited for PTSD:
- Fear extinction is impaired in PTSD (amygdala hyperactivation)
- MDMA: reduces amygdala reactivity to threat
- MDMA: increases prefrontal cortical control
- MDMA: creates a state of openness, trust, reduced defensiveness
- Allows trauma processing without the normal overwhelming fear response
Clinical Evidence
- MAPS Phase 3 trials (MAPP1 and MAPP2):
- 71% of MDMA group no longer met PTSD diagnostic criteria at 18-week primary endpoint
- 48% in placebo group lost PTSD diagnosis
- Response rates: ~67% (MDMA) vs ~32% (placebo)
- Well-tolerated: transient nausea, jaw clenching, insomnia on dosing night
Regulatory Status (2024)
- FDA advisory committee voted against approval (June 2024), concerns about functional unblinding and trial design
- FDA declined to approve (August 2024), requested additional Phase 3 trial
- Not currently approved
- Australia: TGA approved for PTSD treatment (July 2023), first country
Protocol
- 3 MDMA sessions (80–120 mg doses) over ~18 weeks
- Each session 8 hours long
- Therapist dyad (male + female co-therapists recommended by MAPS)
- Extensive preparation and integration therapy
4.3 Ketamine Clinics
Status: Legal, operating in US and India
Administration: IV infusion (most common), IM, intranasal (compounded)
Typical protocol:
- Series of 6 infusions over 2–3 weeks
- 0.5 mg/kg IV over 40 minutes
- Maintenance infusions as needed (monthly, bimonthly)
Indications:
- Treatment-resistant depression
- PTSD (off-label)
- Chronic pain / CRPS
- OCD (emerging data)
Limitations:
- Not standardized (dose, frequency, preparation)
- No regulatory oversight for non-REMS ketamine infusions
- Short duration of effect (days to weeks), necessitates repeat infusions
- Cost: $400–800 per infusion, not usually insured
4.4 Microdosing
Definition: Sub-perceptual doses (1/10th to 1/20th of a full dose)
- Psilocybin: 0.1–0.3 g dried mushroom or ~1–3 mg psilocybin
- LSD: 5–15 mcg (full dose 100–200 mcg)
Proposed benefits (largely anecdotal):
- Improved focus, creativity, mood
- Reduced anxiety
- No psychedelic effects
Evidence base:
- Mostly observational studies and self-reports
- RCTs difficult due to legality
- Imperial College London PNAS study (2021): Microdosing improved well-being, mindfulness scores, but expectation effects (placebo) could explain results
- No RCT-level evidence for clinical use
Regulatory status: Illegal in most jurisdictions including India
4.5 Regulatory Landscape Summary
| Substance | India Status | US Status | Key Approvals |
|---|---|---|---|
| Psilocybin | Schedule I (NDPS) | Schedule I | Australia 2023; FDA BTD |
| MDMA | Prohibited | Schedule I | Australia 2023; FDA rejected 2024 |
| Ketamine | Schedule X (legal, requires prescription) | Schedule III | Esketamine (Spravato) FDA approved |
| LSD | Schedule I | Schedule I | None |
| Cannabis (CBD) | NDPS / state-by-state | Variable | Epidiolex FDA approved (seizures) |
SECTION 5: PRECISION PSYCHIATRY
5.1 Pharmacogenomics
Definition: How genetic variation affects drug metabolism, efficacy, and adverse effects
CYP450 Enzyme Polymorphisms
CYP2D6, most clinically relevant in psychiatry
| Phenotype | Frequency | Effect on CYP2D6 substrates |
|---|---|---|
| Poor metabolizer (PM) | 7–10% Caucasians; 1–2% Asians | Higher blood levels → toxicity risk |
| Intermediate metabolizer (IM) | ~15% | Moderately reduced activity |
| Extensive metabolizer (EM) | ~70% | Normal |
| Ultrarapid metabolizer (UM) | 1–2% Caucasians; 29% Ethiopians | Lower blood levels → treatment failure |
Key CYP2D6 substrates in psychiatry:
- Antidepressants: fluoxetine, paroxetine, vortioxetine, nortriptyline, clomipramine, desipramine
- Antipsychotics: haloperidol, perphenazine, risperidone, aripiprazole
- Note: Fluoxetine and paroxetine are BOTH substrates AND inhibitors of CYP2D6
CYP2C19
Key CYP2C19 substrates:
- Citalopram, escitalopram (higher levels in PMs, QTc concern)
- Sertraline
- Diazepam, clonazepam
- Venlafaxine
HLA-B*1502 and Carbamazepine:
- Carriers of HLA-B*1502 allele at dramatically increased risk of Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) / toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) with carbamazepine
- Frequency: ~10% in Han Chinese, Thai, Filipino
- MANDATORY testing before carbamazepine initiation in patients of Asian ancestry
- FDA label requires this testing
- National Institute of Mental Health India guidelines echo this recommendation
HLA-A*3101:
- Carbamazepine hypersensitivity in European and Japanese populations
- Associated with SJS, DRESS, maculopapular exanthema
HLA-B*5701 and Abacavir:
- Not psychiatric but important model, HIV drug causing hypersensitivity
Pharmacogenomic Testing: Clinical Use
GeneSight and similar commercial panels:
- Tests: CYP2D6, CYP2C19, CYP2C9, CYP1A2, SLC6A4 (5-HTTLPR), MTHFR, HTR2A
- Color-coded report: Use as directed / Use with caution / Use with caution and more frequent monitoring / Not recommended
Limitations:
- Evidence for clinical utility is mixed
- PRIME Care trial (2022): GeneSight testing did not significantly improve HAMD-17 outcomes vs treatment as usual in primary care MDD
- GUIDED trial (2019): Positive results for GeneSight in MDD
- Not routinely recommended by NICE/APA guidelines currently
5.2 Therapeutic Drug Monitoring (TDM)
Indications for TDM in psychiatry:
- Suboptimal response at adequate doses
- Suspected non-adherence
- Suspected toxicity despite therapeutic doses
- Polypharmacy with potential interactions
- Special populations (pregnancy, renal/hepatic disease, elderly)
- Drugs with narrow therapeutic windows
| Drug | Therapeutic Range | Toxic Level | Key Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lithium | 0.6–1.0 mmol/L (maintenance) | >1.5 mmol/L | 0.8–1.2 acute; 12-hour post-dose sample |
| Valproate | 50–100 mcg/mL | >150 mcg/mL | |
| Carbamazepine | 4–12 mcg/mL | >15 mcg/mL | |
| Clozapine | 350–600 ng/mL | >1000 ng/mL | Smoking significantly reduces levels |
| Haloperidol | 5–17 ng/mL | ||
| Nortriptyline | 50–150 ng/mL | Curvilinear response | |
| Imipramine | 150–300 ng/mL | Total (imipramine + desipramine) |
5.3 Biomarker-Guided Treatment
Current approaches:
- HPA axis markers: Cortisol non-suppression on DST → may predict antidepressant response
- Inflammatory markers: High CRP (>1 mg/L) → may prefer anti-inflammatory antidepressants; low CRP → may prefer serotoninergic
- EEG biomarkers: Alpha-wave asymmetry, theta-wave patterns, investigational
- Neuroimaging: Anterior cingulate cortex activity on fMRI/PET → predict response to CBT vs medication
CANMAT recommendations: Biomarker-guided treatment not yet standard of care, promising but needs more RCT evidence
5.4 Computational Psychiatry
Definition: Application of mathematical models and computational algorithms to understand brain function, mental illness, and treatment prediction
Key concepts:
- Predictive Coding / Active Inference: Brain as Bayesian inference machine, mental illness = aberrant precision-weighting of prediction errors
- Reinforcement Learning Models: Anhedonia, addiction modeled as disrupted reward learning
- Dynamic Causal Modeling: Inferring effective connectivity from fMRI data
Clinical applications (emerging):
- Digital phenotyping (smartphone data) to predict relapse
- Machine learning to predict treatment response
- Network analysis of symptom dimensions
Toroidal Model connection: The toroidal geometry models how psychosis and affective states cycle, computational psychiatry provides the mathematical substrate for such models.
SECTION 6: SEROTONIN SYNDROME
6.1 Pathophysiology
Serotonin syndrome results from excess serotonergic activity at central and peripheral 5-HT receptors.
Receptors involved:
- 5-HT1A: Agitation, tachycardia, hypertension, diaphoresis, hyperthermia
- 5-HT2A: Clonus, hyperreflexia, rigidity (mild), myoclonus, temperature dysregulation (severe)
The triad:
6.2 Hunter Criteria (Diagnostic Standard)
The Hunter Serotonin Toxicity Criteria are the most accurate clinical diagnostic criteria.
Requirement: Serotonergic drug must be present PLUS one of the following:
- Spontaneous clonus
- Inducible clonus + (agitation OR diaphoresis)
- Ocular clonus + (agitation OR diaphoresis)
- Tremor + hyperreflexia
- Hypertonia + temperature >38°C + ocular or inducible clonus
Memory hook: HUNTER criteria focus on CLONUS, this is the key neuromuscular finding distinguishing SS from NMS.
Sensitivity: 84% Specificity: 97% (vs Sternbach criteria)
6.3 Culprit Drug Classes
Highest risk combination: MAOI + SSRI/SNRI, potentially fatal
6.4 Clinical Features
Onset: Rapid, within 24 hours of drug initiation/increase/combination (typically within 6 hours)
Course: Usually resolves within 24–72 hours if causative drug stopped
6.5 Management
Step 1: Discontinue all serotonergic drugs
Step 2: Supportive care (IV fluids, cooling measures, benzodiazepines for agitation)
Step 3: Cyproheptadine (5-HT antagonist), 12 mg loading, 2 mg every 2 hours PRN
Step 4: Severe cases: ICU admission, intubation for airway, neuromuscular paralysis
Cyproheptadine:
- H1 antihistamine with 5-HT2A antagonism
- NOT available IV, oral/NG only
- Evidence base: case reports and series, no RCTs
- Alternative: Chlorpromazine (5-HT2A antagonist, but risk of hypotension/seizure threshold lowering)
SECTION 7: NEUROLEPTIC MALIGNANT SYNDROME (NMS)
7.1 Definition and Pathophysiology
NMS is an idiosyncratic, potentially life-threatening reaction to antipsychotic drugs (and other dopamine antagonists).
Pathophysiology:
- Abrupt D2 receptor blockade in:
- Striatum → rigidity, EPS
- Hypothalamus → hyperthermia
- Mesocortex/mesolimbic → cognitive changes
Predisposing factors:
- High-potency typical antipsychotics (haloperidol most associated)
- Rapid dose increase
- IM depot injections
- Dehydration
- Agitation, physical restraint
- Prior NMS episode (10–15x increased risk)
- Young male patients
- Brain pathology (dementia, Parkinson's)
7.2 Clinical Features: FEVER + RIGIDITY Mnemonic
Lab findings:
- Elevated CK (diagnostic hallmark), >1000 U/L typical
- Leukocytosis (WBC 10,000–40,000)
- Metabolic acidosis
- Elevated LFTs
- Myoglobinuria → renal failure risk
- Low serum iron (<12 μmol/L), specific for NMS
Onset: Slower than SS, hours to days after starting/changing antipsychotic
Duration: Without treatment: 1–2 weeks; with DAergic agonists: shorter
7.3 SS vs NMS vs Malignant Catatonia vs Malignant Hyperthermia
| Feature | Serotonin Syndrome | NMS | Malignant Catatonia | Malignant Hyperthermia |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cause | Serotonergic drugs | Dopamine antagonists | Idiopathic (or triggered by antipsychotics) | Volatile anesthetics/succinylcholine |
| Onset | Hours (rapid) | Days | Subacute | Minutes (during anesthesia) |
| Temperature | Moderate elevation | High | High | Extremely high |
| Rigidity | Mild (SS) | Lead-pipe (severe) | Waxy/posturing | Very severe |
| Clonus | YES, characteristic | No | No | No |
| Tremor | Prominent | Less prominent | Variable | Variable |
| Reflexes | Hyperreflexia | Normal/reduced | Variable | Normal |
| CK | Usually normal | Very elevated | Elevated | Very elevated |
| Consciousness | Agitated, alert early | Stupor | Stupor, mutism | Usually unconscious |
| Treatment | Cyproheptadine | Dantrolene/bromocriptine | ECT, lorazepam | Dantrolene |
| Mutism/posturing | Rare | Absent | YES, defining | Absent |
7.4 NMS Management
Immediate:
- Stop antipsychotic
- Supportive care: hydration, cooling, monitoring
- Benzodiazepines for rigidity and agitation
Pharmacological:
- Dantrolene (0.25–2 mg/kg IV q6h): Blocks calcium release from SR → reduces muscle rigidity and hyperthermia
- Bromocriptine (2.5–5 mg TID): D2 agonist → reverses dopamine blockade
- Amantadine (100 mg BD): NMDA antagonist + dopaminergic properties
ECT: For refractory NMS and malignant catatonia (can be diagnostically confounding)
Re-challenge with antipsychotic:
- Wait minimum 2 weeks after NMS resolution
- Start with low-potency atypical antipsychotic (clozapine, quetiapine)
- Low doses, gradual titration
- Avoid precipitating factors (dehydration, IM depot)
- Close monitoring
SECTION 8: DRUG INTERACTIONS IN PSYCHIATRY
8.1 Pharmacokinetic Interactions
CYP450-Mediated Interactions
Major CYP450 enzymes in psychiatry:
| Enzyme | Major Inhibitors | Major Inducers | Key Substrates |
|---|---|---|---|
| CYP2D6 | Fluoxetine, paroxetine, bupropion, haloperidol | TCAs, codeine, risperidone, aripiprazole | |
| CYP3A4 | Ketoconazole, ritonavir, clarithromycin, grapefruit | Rifampin, carbamazepine, St John's Wort | Quetiapine, clonazepam, buspirone, most benzodiazepines |
| CYP1A2 | Ciprofloxacin, fluvoxamine | Smoking, carbamazepine, omeprazole | Clozapine, olanzapine, haloperidol |
| CYP2C19 | Fluvoxamine, fluoxetine | Rifampin, carbamazepine | Diazepam, escitalopram |
| CYP2C9 | Fluconazole, amiodarone | Rifampin, carbamazepine | Warfarin, phenytoin |
Smoking and CYP1A2:
Critical clinical point: Smoking INDUCES CYP1A2, reduces clozapine and olanzapine levels significantly. - Heavy smokers (>10 cigs/day) may need 50–100% higher clozapine doses - If patient stops smoking (hospitalization, cessation), clozapine levels can RISE → toxicity risk - Monitor clozapine levels with smoking status changes
Fluvoxamine as CYP1A2 inhibitor:
- Fluvoxamine strongly inhibits CYP1A2
- Combined with clozapine → clozapine levels increase 2–10 fold
- Can cause clozapine toxicity even at normal doses
- Some clinicians use low-dose fluvoxamine to increase clozapine levels in treatment-resistant cases (intentional interaction)
P-glycoprotein (P-gp) Interactions
- P-gp is an efflux transporter in the blood-brain barrier
- P-gp inhibitors → increase CNS penetration of substrates
- Quetiapine: P-gp substrate
- Verapamil: P-gp inhibitor
8.2 High-Risk Drug Combinations
Lithium + NSAIDs
Mechanism: NSAIDs reduce renal prostaglandin synthesis → reduced renal blood flow → decreased lithium clearance → lithium toxicity
Magnitude of interaction:
- Indomethacin, diclofenac, ibuprofen: 50–100% increase in lithium levels
- Aspirin (low dose): minimal effect
- COX-2 inhibitors (celecoxib): similar risk to NSAIDs
Management: Avoid NSAIDs with lithium. If unavoidable, monitor lithium levels closely, reduce dose, use aspirin as alternative.
Other drugs that raise lithium levels:
- ACE inhibitors / ARBs: reduce renal excretion
- Thiazide diuretics: sodium depletion → lithium retention
- Dehydration/low-sodium diet: same mechanism
MAOIs + SSRIs/SNRIs/TCAs
Mechanism: Combined serotonergic activity → severe serotonin syndrome
Risk: POTENTIALLY FATAL
Washout periods:
After stopping MAOI: Wait 2 weeks before starting any serotonergic drug
Clozapine + Carbamazepine
Mechanism: Carbamazepine induces CYP1A2 and CYP3A4 → reduces clozapine levels
Additional risk: Both drugs are independently associated with agranulocytosis, ADDITIVE risk
Combination: ABSOLUTELY CONTRAINDICATED
If mood stabilizer needed with clozapine:
- Valproate (preferred, though monitor for sedation)
- Lithium (monitor levels)
- Lamotrigine (adjunct for negative symptoms, some evidence)
Clozapine + Benzodiazepines
Mechanism: CNS depression, respiratory depression
Risk: Case reports of sudden death and respiratory collapse with IM clozapine + benzodiazepines
IMPORTANT: Avoid IM benzodiazepines within hours of clozapine administration; caution with oral combination
Lithium + Antipsychotics (High-Dose)
Risk: Neurotoxicity, enhanced adverse effects even at therapeutic levels
Most reported with: Haloperidol
Features: EPS, confusion, fever, delirium
Historical note: Early reports (1970s) linked haloperidol + lithium to irreversible brain damage, "Loulis and Hurley syndrome"
SECTION 9: LITHIUM: COMPREHENSIVE
9.1 Pharmacology
Mechanism of Action (Multiple):
- Inositol depletion hypothesis: Inhibits inositol monophosphatase → depletes inositol → reduces PKC-mediated signaling in overactive cells
- Glycogen Synthase Kinase-3 (GSK-3β) inhibition: Reduces phosphorylation cascade → neuroprotective, anti-apoptotic
- Neurotrophin effects: Increases BDNF, promotes neurogenesis
- Serotonin potentiation: Enhances 5-HT synthesis and release (basis for augmentation)
- Anti-glutamatergic: Reduces NMDA receptor signaling
- Epigenetic: Histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibition
Pharmacokinetics:
- Complete GI absorption (100%)
- No protein binding
- Renal excretion (competitive with sodium, depleted sodium leads to lithium retention)
- Half-life: ~24 hours (acute); 36–48 hours (chronic, with renal accumulation)
- Steady state: 5–7 days
- No hepatic metabolism, ideal for patients with liver disease
9.2 Therapeutic Drug Monitoring
Monitoring protocol:
- Level drawn 12 hours after last dose
- Baseline: Renal function (Cr, BUN, eGFR), thyroid (TSH, FT4), calcium, ECG, pregnancy test (women of reproductive age)
- Frequency: Every 5–7 days during initiation; then monthly × 6 months; then every 3–6 months when stable
9.3 Lithium Toxicity
Signs by Level
Memory: FINE mnemonic for lithium toxicity: Fine tremor → Intention tremor (coarser) → Nausea → Encephalopathy
Precipitants of toxicity:
- NSAIDs, ACE inhibitors, diuretics
- Dehydration (febrile illness, surgery, low-sodium diet)
- Renal impairment
- Drug-drug interactions (CKD patients particularly vulnerable)
Management:
- Stop lithium
- IV normal saline (aggressive hydration and sodium correction)
- Hemodialysis if:
- Level >4 mmol/L
- Level >2.5 mmol/L with severe symptoms
- Severe renal failure preventing excretion
- Sodium polystyrene sulfonate, evidence limited
- Activated charcoal: NOT effective (lithium not absorbed by charcoal)
9.4 Long-Term Effects
Renal effects:
- Nephrogenic diabetes insipidus (NDI): Lithium blocks vasopressin effect on collecting duct → polyuria, polydipsia
- Occurs in ~40% of patients
- Management: reduce to once-daily dosing, amiloride (blocks ENaC channel that lithium uses to enter cells), indomethacin (short-term)
- Chronic kidney disease: Irreversible tubular atrophy with long-term use (>10–15 years)
- Risk factors: older age, higher levels, episodes of toxicity
- Monitoring: eGFR trend annually
Thyroid effects:
- Hypothyroidism: ~20–40% of long-term users
- Less commonly, hyperthyroidism (Graves' disease, autoimmune)
- Monitor TSH annually, treat with levothyroxine (do NOT stop lithium)
Cardiac effects:
- T-wave flattening/inversion, benign
- Sinus node dysfunction, rare
- Avoid in sick sinus syndrome
Parathyroid effects:
- Hyperparathyroidism → hypercalcemia
- Mechanism: lithium increases set point for calcium-mediated PTH suppression
9.5 Lithium in Pregnancy
Teratogenicity:
- Historical concern: Ebstein's anomaly (tricuspid valve malformation)
- Updated estimates (2017 NEJM): Absolute risk increases from 0.6/1000 to 2.1/1000, much lower than previously thought
- Risk ratio ~2.66, significant but not as catastrophic as older estimates
CANMAT/NICE guidance:
- Benefit-risk discussion individualized
- For moderate-high risk patients: lithium may be continued with monitoring
- Fetal echocardiogram at 16–18 weeks if lithium continued
- Lithium levels increase in first trimester (increased renal clearance), then levels spike post-partum (renal clearance falls)
- Peri-partum: Dose reduction by 25–50% at 36 weeks; re-titrate after delivery
- Breastfeeding: Excreted in breast milk (40–50% of maternal level), generally advised against; discuss carefully
SECTION 10: CLOZAPINE: COMPREHENSIVE
10.1 Indications
TRS Definition (TRRIP consensus):
- Adequate trials of ≥2 antipsychotics (one should be an SGA)
- Each at adequate dose (e.g., >600 mg chlorpromazine equivalents)
- For adequate duration (≥6 weeks each)
- With documented adherence
- With persistent positive symptoms (CGI-S ≥4)
Time to clozapine:
- Average in real world: 5–10 years after first psychosis
- Evidence supports earlier use after 2 failed adequate trials
- NICE guidelines: After 2 failed antipsychotics
10.2 Clozapine Monitoring: The ANC Protocol
ANC = Absolute Neutrophil Count
Monitoring frequency:
- Weeks 1–26: Weekly ANC
- Weeks 27–52: Every 2 weeks
- After 1 year: Monthly
Agranulocytosis risk:
- Overall: ~0.8–1% (with monitoring)
- Peak risk: Weeks 6–18
- Higher risk: Ashkenazi Jewish descent, BNL (Benign Ethnic Neutropenia in African descent)
Benign Ethnic Neutropenia (BEN):
- African/Caribbean descent: baseline ANC 1000–1500/mm³ common (not pathological)
- New protocol allows clozapine in BEN with adjusted ANC thresholds
10.3 Clozapine Adverse Effects
Metabolic Effects (Severe)
- Weight gain: 4–10 kg average; most among all antipsychotics
- Diabetes mellitus: significantly increased risk
- Dyslipidemia: elevated triglycerides especially
- Mechanism: H1 antagonism (appetite increase), M1 antagonism (impaired insulin response)
Cardiovascular
- Myocarditis/Cardiomyopathy:
- Myocarditis: Occurs in first 4–8 weeks (peak weeks 2–4)
- Incidence: ~0.3–0.7% (higher in Australian data: ~1–3%)
- Features: fever, chest pain, fatigue, eosinophilia, elevated troponin, CRP
- Action if suspected: STOP clozapine immediately; echo, cardiac enzyme monitoring
- Re-challenge: controversial, avoided in most cases
- If absolutely necessary: very gradual titration, prophylactic aspirin (evidence weak)
- QTc prolongation: Moderate risk
- Orthostatic hypotension: Common especially during titration
Seizures
- Dose-dependent: 1–2% at doses <300 mg/day; up to 5% at doses >600 mg/day
- Generalized tonic-clonic (GTCS)
- Management:
- Reduce clozapine dose if possible
- Add valproate (drug of choice, also helps metabolic symptoms and reduces prolactin)
- Avoid carbamazepine (agranulocytosis risk) and lamotrigine (rash risk if valproate added)
- Gabapentin or clonazepam as alternatives
Other Side Effects
- Hypersalivation (sialorrhea): Very common, especially nocturnal. Anticholinergics (hyoscine), pilocarpine, or pirenzepine
- Sedation: Most common complaint, use sedation to advantage by dosing at night
- Constipation: Serious, ileus risk. Prevent with bowel regimen
- Urinary incontinence/retention
- Fever (within first few weeks): Often benign, rule out agranulocytosis and myocarditis
10.4 Clozapine Re-challenge Protocol
Indicated when: Benefits outweigh risks after previous adverse event (not agranulocytosis)
Contraindicated re-challenge: Agranulocytosis (ANC <500) or NMS
Protocol for re-challenge (after myocarditis, special centers only):
- Cardiac clearance from cardiologist
- Baseline troponin, CRP, echo
- Very slow titration (6.25 mg every 1–2 weeks)
- Daily monitoring of cardiac enzymes for first 4–8 weeks
- Low-dose aspirin (evidence weak, sometimes used prophylactically)
SECTION 11: ANTIPSYCHOTIC SWITCHING STRATEGIES
11.1 Rationale for Switching
Reasons to switch antipsychotic:
- Inadequate efficacy
- Adverse effects (EPS, metabolic, sedation)
- Adherence issues (preference for LAI, simplification)
- Specific comorbidity (e.g., depression → add mood benefits)
11.2 Cross-Titration
Most common approach, gradual overlap:
Steps:
- Start new drug at low dose
- Gradually increase new drug
- Gradually taper old drug
- Complete switch when new drug at target dose
Best for: Most switching scenarios, especially between drugs of different receptor profiles
11.3 Plateau Strategy (Abrupt Switch)
Abrupt discontinuation of old drug + immediate full dose of new drug
Used for:
- Switching to clozapine (often done this way)
- Patient preference, clinical urgency
- Drugs with very long half-lives (no need for gradual taper)
Risk: Withdrawal effects, rebound psychosis
11.4 Overlap Strategy (Add and Maintain)
New drug started and maintained at therapeutic dose while old drug continued temporarily
Used for:
- Adding clozapine to partial responder (augmentation phase)
- Assessing response to new drug before committing
11.5 Special Considerations by Drug
Switching FROM clozapine:
- Very risky, "supersensitivity psychosis" risk
- Very gradual taper (3–6 months)
- Bridge with other antipsychotic at full dose
- Clinical deterioration expected in many patients
Switching TO clozapine:
- Usually abrupt switch (clozapine requires titration from scratch anyway)
- Previous drug maintained briefly while clozapine titrated up, then tapered
Switching from depot:
- Cannot abruptly stop depot
- Plan based on half-life of specific depot (weeks to months)
- Start oral drug at appropriate time point in injection cycle
SECTION 12: AUGMENTATION STRATEGIES
12.1 Lithium Augmentation of Antidepressants
Evidence: Level I, most evidence-based augmentation strategy for treatment-resistant depression
Mechanism:
- Enhances serotonin synthesis and release
- Potentiates 5-HT1A autoreceptor desensitization
- Potentiates mood-stabilizing effects
Protocol:
- Add lithium to current antidepressant
- Target level: 0.5–0.8 mmol/L for augmentation (lower than bipolar)
- Response expected: 2–4 weeks
- Continue 6–12 months if response achieved
Evidence:
- Multiple RCTs and meta-analyses confirm efficacy
- NNT approximately 5 for augmentation
- Effective across SSRIs, TCAs, MAOIs
12.2 Triiodothyronine (T3) Augmentation
Mechanism: T3 sensitizes serotonin receptors; potentiates TCA activity
Evidence:
- Strong evidence for TCA augmentation
- Weaker evidence for SSRIs
- Meta-analysis: 24% response vs 14% placebo when added to TCAs
Dose: T3 25–50 mcg/day (low dose, below replacement threshold)
Duration: 3–4 week trial; continue 6–12 months if response
Adverse effects: Tachycardia, anxiety, osteoporosis risk (long-term)
Contraindicated: Cardiac disease, hyperthyroidism
12.3 Atypical Antipsychotic + SSRI
Most evidence:
| AP | SSRI | Indication | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aripiprazole | SSRIs | TRD | FDA approved |
| Quetiapine | SSRIs | TRD | FDA approved |
| Brexpiprazole | SSRIs | TRD | FDA approved |
| Olanzapine | Fluoxetine | Bipolar depression; TRD | FDA approved (OFC) |
Mechanisms:
- 5-HT2A antagonism (AP) + SERT inhibition (SSRI) → greater serotonin throughput
- Partial D2 agonism (aripiprazole) → improves motivation, reduces anhedonia
- Noradrenergic enhancement
12.4 Clozapine Augmentation Strategies
For ultra-treatment-resistant schizophrenia (inadequate response to clozapine alone):
| Augmentation | Evidence | Mechanism |
|---|---|---|
| Amisulpride | Moderate | D2/D3 antagonism adds to clozapine |
| Sulpiride | Moderate | D2/D3 antagonism |
| Aripiprazole | Multiple RCTs | Partial agonism, reduces metabolic effects |
| Lamotrigine | Multiple RCTs | AMPA potentiation, glutamate modulation |
| Mirtazapine | Pilot data | NaSSA properties |
| ECT | Case series | Refractory positive symptoms |
Aripiprazole + clozapine: Well-studied, reduces weight, metabolic effects; modest improvement in psychopathology
SECTION 13: DISCONTINUATION SYNDROMES
13.1 SSRI Discontinuation Syndrome
Incidence: 20–40% of patients stopping SSRIs abruptly
Clinical features, FINISH mnemonic:
- Flu-like symptoms (malaise, myalgia, chills)
- Insomnia, vivid dreams
- Nausea, GI disturbance
- Imbalance (dizziness, vertigo)
- Sensory disturbances (electric shock sensations, paresthesias, pathognomonic)
- Hyperarousal, anxiety
Onset: 1–4 days after abrupt discontinuation
Duration: 1–2 weeks; can persist longer
Risk by half-life:
| Drug | Half-life | Discontinuation Risk |
|---|---|---|
| Paroxetine | ~24h (no active metabolite) | HIGHEST |
| Venlafaxine | ~5h | VERY HIGH |
| Sertraline | ~26h | Moderate |
| Fluoxetine | 4–6 days + norfluoxetine 4–16 days | LOWEST, self-tapering |
| Escitalopram | ~27h | Moderate |
Management:
- Gradual taper (minimum 2 weeks; often 4–8 weeks for long-term use)
- If already stopped: reinstate low dose, taper slowly
- Switch to fluoxetine for easier taper
- Liquid formulations allow micro-tapering
13.2 Benzodiazepine Withdrawal
Mechanism: Chronic BZD use → downregulation of GABA-A receptors → upon discontinuation, excess CNS excitability
Clinical features:
- Mild: Anxiety, insomnia, tremor, sweating, irritability
- Moderate: Tachycardia, hypertension, perceptual disturbances
- Severe: Seizures, delirium (benzodiazepine withdrawal delirium)
- Risk of death (unlike most drug withdrawals; similar to alcohol withdrawal)
Timeline:
- Short-acting BZDs (lorazepam, oxazepam): Onset 12–24 hours
- Long-acting BZDs (diazepam, clonazepam): Onset 2–4 days
Management:
- Substitution with long-acting BZD (diazepam or chlordiazepoxide) and gradual taper
- Rule of 10%: Reduce dose by 10% every 1–2 weeks (Ashton manual)
- Adjuncts: Carbamazepine, valproate (reduce seizure risk, help with psychological symptoms)
- Propranolol for autonomic symptoms
- Thiamine for those with alcohol co-dependence
13.3 Antipsychotic Withdrawal (Discontinuation)
Supersensitivity psychosis:
- Dopamine receptor upregulation after chronic D2 blockade
- Abrupt discontinuation → dopaminergic rebound → florid psychosis within days-weeks
- Can appear even in patients who did not have primary psychotic illness
- Distinction from relapse: onset within days of discontinuation; often more severe and atypical
Cholinergic rebound:
- Especially after stopping low-potency APs (clozapine, quetiapine) with high M1 antagonism
- Features: nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, headache, insomnia
- Onset: 24–48 hours after discontinuation
Management of AP discontinuation:
- Gradual taper (months, not weeks, for chronic use)
- Especially slow for clozapine (3–6 months)
- Clinical monitoring for re-emergence of psychosis
SECTION 14: POLYPHARMACY IN PSYCHIATRY
14.1 Evidence-Based Combinations
Combinations with strong evidence:
| Combination | Indication | Evidence Level |
|---|---|---|
| SSRI + atypical AP (aripiprazole/quetiapine/brexpiprazole) | TRD | Level I, FDA approved |
| Lithium + antidepressant | TRD | Level I |
| Valproate + lithium | Bipolar disorder (mania) | Level II |
| SSRI + buspirone | Anxiety-predominant depression | Level II |
| Olanzapine + fluoxetine | Bipolar depression | Level I, FDA approved |
| Clozapine + lamotrigine | TRS augmentation | Level II (multiple RCTs) |
| SSRIs + CBT | Anxiety/OCD | Level I |
14.2 Irrational Polypharmacy
High-risk irrational combinations:
- Two antipsychotics simultaneously (except specific situations): increased side effects, no added efficacy
- Two antidepressants without rationale: Limited evidence for most combinations
- Benzodiazepine + Z-drug: Additive CNS depression
- Multiple anticholinergics: Cognitive impairment, peripheral toxicity
Rational for two APs (limited evidence):
- Clozapine + amisulpride/aripiprazole: Evidence exists
- During cross-titration (temporary)
- Depot (stability) + oral (breakthrough), not ideal
14.3 Deprescribing
Principles:
- Identify medications that are: no longer needed, duplicative, cause harm
- Prioritize: Start with highest risk/burden medication
- Gradual taper (especially for psych meds)
- Shared decision-making with patient
- Explicit stop dates and review points
HIGH-YIELD for deprescribing in psychiatry:
- Anticholinergics (for EPS that may have resolved)
- Sleep aids (evaluate and potentially discontinue benzodiazepines)
- Antipsychotics in dementia (when behavior has improved)
- PRN antipsychotics that have become regular
- Redundant mood stabilizers in stable bipolar disorder
SECTION 15: CANNABIS-BASED MEDICINES
15.1 Cannabinoids: Overview
| Compound | Receptor | Effect |
|---|---|---|
| THC (tetrahydrocannabinol) | CB1 (full agonist), CB2 | Psychoactive, analgesic |
| CBD (cannabidiol) | CB1 (inverse agonist/antagonist), 5-HT1A agonist | Non-psychoactive, anxiolytic, anti-seizure |
| Nabilone | Synthetic CB1 agonist | Analgesic, antiemetic |
| Dronabinol | Synthetic THC | Antiemetic, appetite stimulant |
| Nabiximols (Sativex) | THC:CBD (1:1) | Spasticity (MS) |
15.2 Nabilone
Regulatory status: Approved in India (Schedule H drug); FDA approved in US
Indications:
- Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) unresponsive to conventional antiemetics
- Chronic pain (off-label)
- PTSD nightmares (off-label, limited evidence)
Mechanism: Synthetic cannabinoid, CB1 and CB2 agonist
Dose: 1–2 mg BD; reduce dose in elderly
15.3 CBD Oil
Epidiolex: FDA-approved CBD (100% CBD, plant-derived)
- Approved for: Dravet syndrome, Lennox-Gastaut syndrome, tuberous sclerosis complex
- Mechanism: GABA-A PAM, CB1 inverse agonist, TRPV1 agonist, inhibits AEA reuptake
CBD for psychiatric conditions:
- Anxiety: Small RCTs and open-label studies suggest benefit for social anxiety; dose range 300–600 mg
- Psychosis: CBD as antipsychotic? Phase II trial showing CBD reduced positive symptoms in schizophrenia; mechanism may involve AEA-CB1 pathway normalization
- PTSD: Limited data; being studied
India regulatory status:
- Cannabis plants: NDPS Act 1985, Schedule I narcotics
- However: CBD products (under 0.3% THC) exist in a grey zone
- No approved CBD formulation for psychiatric use in India
- State government licenses required for research
15.4 Cannabinoid Hyperemesis Syndrome (CHS)
- Paradoxical cyclical vomiting in heavy, long-term cannabis users
- Typically relieved by hot showers (compulsive bathing behavior)
- Mechanism: CB1 receptor desensitization vs direct emetic effects
- Treatment: Cessation of cannabis; capsaicin cream (topical, for bathing behavior); haloperidol has evidence for acute management
SECTION 16: KEY EXAM TABLES AND SUMMARIES
16.1 Novel Mechanisms: Quick Reference
| Drug | Class | Key Mechanism | Key Indication |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vortioxetine | SMS | SERT + 5-HT3 antagonist + 5-HT7 antagonist | MDD (cognitive benefits) |
| Vilazodone | SPARI | SERT + 5-HT1A partial agonist | MDD |
| Esketamine | NMDA antagonist | S-enantiomer of ketamine | TRD, MDSI |
| Brexanolone | Neuroactive steroid | GABA-A PAM (synaptic + extrasynaptic) | PPD |
| Zuranolone | Neuroactive steroid (oral) | GABA-A PAM | MDD, PPD |
| Auvelity (DXM-BUP) | NMDA antagonist + NDRI | DXM NMDA antagonism; BUP inhibits CYP2D6 | MDD |
| Pimavanserin | 5-HT2A inverse agonist | NO D2 binding | Parkinson's psychosis |
| Lumateperone | Novel AP | D1 agonist + D2 pre/post modulator + SERT inhibitor | Schizophrenia, bipolar depression |
| Cariprazine | D2/D3 partial agonist | HIGH D3 selectivity | Schizophrenia (negative symptoms), bipolar |
| Suvorexant | DORA | OX1R + OX2R antagonist | Insomnia |
| Daridorexant | DORA (short T1/2) | OX1R + OX2R antagonist | Insomnia (daytime functioning) |
| Brexpiprazole | SDAM | D2 partial agonist (low intrinsic activity) | Schizophrenia, MDD augmentation, AD agitation |
Total estimated word count: ~18,000 words
Model Answers
15 Model Answers
ANSWER 01
Discuss the pharmacology, indications, adverse effects, and monitoring of clozapine. How would you manage clozapine-induced agranulocytosis? (15 marks)
Introduction
Clozapine remains the gold standard for treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS), the only antipsychotic with FDA approval for reducing suicidal behaviour in schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder. Its unique pharmacological profile explains both its superior efficacy and its complex adverse effect burden.
Pharmacology
Clozapine is a dibenzodiazepine atypical antipsychotic with an unusually broad receptor binding profile:
| Receptor | Action | Clinical Consequence |
|---|---|---|
| D4 | High-affinity antagonist | Reduced positive symptoms |
| D2 | Low-affinity antagonist (fast dissociation) | Low EPS, low prolactin elevation |
| D1 | Antagonist | Cognitive effects |
| 5-HT2A | Potent antagonist | Antidepressant, anti-EPS effect |
| 5-HT2C | Antagonist | Weight gain, metabolic effects |
| M1–M5 | Antagonist | Sialorrhea (paradox: M2 block), tachycardia, constipation |
| H1 | Potent antagonist | Sedation, weight gain |
| α1, α2 | Antagonist | Orthostatic hypotension |
| GABA-A | Allosteric modulation | Seizure risk at high doses |
The key pharmacokinetic characteristic of clozapine is its dependence on CYP1A2 for metabolism, smoking and drugs that induce or inhibit this enzyme cause clinically significant level changes.
Clozapine's "fast-off" kinetics from D2 receptors (unlike haloperidol which binds tightly) are proposed to explain low EPS despite its antipsychotic efficacy (the "fast dissociation hypothesis," Kapur and Seeman).
Indications
- Treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS): Defined as inadequate response after ≥2 adequate antipsychotic trials. Level I evidence; NNT approximately 6 compared to standard antipsychotics.
- Suicidality in schizophrenia/schizoaffective disorder: FDA-approved specifically for this indication, the only antipsychotic to carry it.
- Parkinson's disease psychosis: When pimavanserin is unavailable or ineffective, very low doses (12.5–50 mg) preserve motor function.
- Refractory bipolar disorder: Off-label, evidence-based.
- Chronic violence/aggression: Evidence for reducing aggression even independent of psychotic symptoms.
Adverse Effects
Haematological (potentially life-threatening):
- Agranulocytosis: ~0.8% lifetime risk. Peak onset weeks 6–18. Mechanism: toxic/immunological destruction of granulocyte precursors.
- Benign neutropenia: up to 3%, usually transient.
Cardiovascular:
- Myocarditis: 0.3–0.7% (Australian data suggests up to 3%). Peak weeks 2–4 of treatment. Features: fever, chest pain, eosinophilia, elevated troponin and CRP. Action: STOP immediately.
- Cardiomyopathy: later, dilated type.
- QTc prolongation: moderate risk.
- Orthostatic hypotension: especially during titration.
Metabolic:
- Weight gain: 4–10 kg average, highest among all antipsychotics.
- Type 2 diabetes mellitus.
- Dyslipidaemia: especially hypertriglyceridaemia.
Neurological:
- Seizures: dose-dependent (1–2% at <300 mg/day; up to 5% at >600 mg/day). Generalised tonic-clonic.
- Sedation: common, utilise by dosing at night.
- EPS: very rare.
Autonomic:
- Hypersalivation (sialorrhea): very common, especially nocturnal. Mechanism: M2 antagonism in salivary glands.
- Constipation: potentially severe, ileus risk.
- Urinary incontinence.
Monitoring Protocol
| Time Point | ANC Monitoring | Additional |
|---|---|---|
| Weeks 1–26 | Weekly | Baseline ECG, troponin, CRP, echo |
| Weeks 27–52 | Every 2 weeks | Fasting glucose, lipids at 3 months |
| After 52 weeks | Monthly | Annual metabolic panel, renal function |
ANC thresholds:
- ≥1500/mm³: continue
- 1000–1499: continue with more frequent monitoring
- 500–999: interrupt, daily monitoring
- <500 (agranulocytosis): STOP, permanent contraindication to re-challenge
Management of Agranulocytosis
Definition: ANC <500/mm³
Immediate actions:
- Stop clozapine immediately
- Notify the clozapine registry (CPMS in India, REMS in US)
- Admit patient
- Reverse barrier nursing (infection precaution)
- Daily FBC
- Urgent haematology consultation
Medical management:
- G-CSF (Granulocyte Colony Stimulating Factor): filgrastim 300–480 mcg/day SC, stimulates granulocyte recovery. Now standard of care.
- Prophylactic antibiotics if fever or clinical infection
- Monitor for sepsis
Recovery: Usually 2–3 weeks with G-CSF; without G-CSF: 3–4 weeks.
Re-challenge: ABSOLUTELY CONTRAINDICATED after true agranulocytosis. The patient must be permanently registered as contraindicated in the clozapine registry.
Antipsychotic alternatives after agranulocytosis:
- Quetiapine, olanzapine, amisulpride
- Higher relapse risk, expect clinical deterioration
- Consider LAI for adherence
Conclusion
Clozapine remains irreplaceable in TRS despite its adverse effect burden. The mandatory monitoring system has reduced agranulocytosis mortality from >10% to <5%. The clinical decision to initiate clozapine should be made in a specialist setting with patient education, written consent, and enrolment in the monitoring registry.
ANSWER 02
Write a detailed note on serotonin syndrome: pathophysiology, clinical features, diagnosis, and management. Distinguish from neuroleptic malignant syndrome. (10 marks)
Introduction
Serotonin syndrome (SS) is a drug-induced syndrome caused by excess serotonergic activity at central and peripheral 5-HT receptors. It is a clinical diagnosis based on drug history and examination. Unlike NMS, it is predominantly pharmacological in origin and typically self-limiting.
Pathophysiology
Excess serotonin acts at two key receptors:
- 5-HT1A: Mediates cognitive and autonomic effects, agitation, tachycardia, hypertension, hyperthermia
- 5-HT2A: Mediates neuromuscular effects, clonus, myoclonus, hyperreflexia, and at high stimulation: life-threatening hyperthermia
The critical neuromuscular pathways:
- Spinal 5-HT2A receptors: clonus, hyperreflexia
- Brainstem 5-HT: temperature dysregulation
- Peripheral autonomic: tachycardia, diaphoresis
Clinical Features, The Classic Triad
Severity spectrum:
- Mild: tremor, tachycardia, diaphoresis, mydriasis, intermittent tremor
- Moderate: all above + clonus, hyperreflexia, hyperthermia <38.5°C, agitation
- Severe: hyperthermia >41°C, rhabdomyolysis, metabolic acidosis, renal failure, DIC, respiratory failure
Onset: Rapid, typically within 6 hours of causative drug exposure.
Diagnosis, Hunter Serotonin Toxicity Criteria
Requirement: Serotonergic agent present PLUS one of:
- Spontaneous clonus
- Inducible clonus + (agitation OR diaphoresis)
- Ocular clonus + (agitation OR diaphoresis)
- Tremor + hyperreflexia
- Hypertonia + temperature >38°C + (ocular OR inducible clonus)
Sensitivity 84%, specificity 97%, superior to Sternbach criteria.
High-risk drug combinations: MAOI + SSRI (potentially fatal), MAOI + tramadol, MAOI + meperidine, SSRI + linezolid, SSRI + tramadol.
Management
SS vs NMS Distinction
| Feature | Serotonin Syndrome | NMS |
|---|---|---|
| Cause | Serotonergic excess | Dopamine antagonist (antipsychotic) |
| Onset | Hours (rapid) | Days (gradual) |
| Neuromuscular | Clonus, hyperreflexia | Lead-pipe rigidity, no clonus |
| Reflexes | HYPERREFLEXIA | Normal or reduced |
| Temperature | Moderate-severe | Severe |
| CK | Usually normal | Very elevated (>1000, often >10,000) |
| Treatment | Cyproheptadine | Dantrolene, bromocriptine |
| Resolution | 24–72h after drug stopped | 1–2 weeks |
| Mutism/catatonia | Absent | May be present |
Mnemonic to remember the clonus distinction: SS = Spastic and Spikey (hyperreflexia, clonus); NMS = Necrotic and Numb (rigidity, elevated CK).
ANSWER 03
Discuss the pharmacology, clinical evidence, REMS requirements, and place in therapy of esketamine nasal spray for treatment-resistant depression. (10 marks)
Introduction
Esketamine (Spravato, intranasal) received FDA approval in 2019, becoming the first truly novel antidepressant mechanism since the introduction of SSRIs in the 1980s. As the S-enantiomer of ketamine, it offers rapid onset of action via glutamatergic modulation, a departure from the monoamine-based framework that dominated psychiatry for six decades.
Pharmacology
Mechanism:
- NMDA receptor antagonism (primary): Esketamine binds to the phencyclidine (PCP) site inside the NMDA receptor channel (open-channel block). This inhibits glutamatergic transmission acutely.
- AMPA receptor disinhibition (downstream): NMDA blockade at interneurons (which tonically inhibit AMPA activity) leads to a burst of AMPA receptor activation. This triggers BDNF release from neurons, activating the TrkB-mTOR signalling cascade.
- Synaptogenesis: mTOR activation drives rapid de novo protein synthesis → new synaptic spines form within hours → this is the cellular basis of the rapid antidepressant effect.
- Additional mechanisms: Opioid receptor modulation has been proposed (controversial), HCN1 channel blockade, sigma-1 receptor interaction.
Pharmacokinetics:
- Intranasal bioavailability: ~48% (higher than expected due to direct CNS access via olfactory pathways)
- Tmax: 20–40 minutes
- Half-life: ~7–12 hours
- Metabolism: hepatic (CYP3A4, CYP2B6) to noresketamine (active)
- Dose: 56 mg or 84 mg intranasally
Clinical Evidence
| Trial | Design | Key Finding |
|---|---|---|
| TRANSFORM-2 | Phase III RCT, TRD | Esketamine + new oral AD superior to oral AD + placebo on MADRS at Day 28 |
| TRANSFORM-3 | Phase III, elderly TRD | Positive; slower titration needed |
| SUSTAIN-1 | Maintenance RCT | Significant reduction in relapse rate vs placebo |
| ASPIRE-I, II | TRD with MDSI | Rapid reduction in suicidality within 24 hours |
Onset of action: Antidepressant effects within 2–4 hours; clinically meaningful by 24–48 hours. Peaks at 1–4 weeks.
REMS Requirements
Esketamine carries a mandatory REMS (Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy) programme, one of approximately 60 drugs in the US with this requirement.
Key REMS elements:
- Certified healthcare settings only: Cannot be dispensed at a pharmacy for home use
- On-site supervision: Patient must receive each dose in a certified healthcare facility
- Post-dose monitoring: Minimum 2 hours observation for:
- Dissociation (most common, occurs in >50%)
- Sedation
- Blood pressure elevation (systolic rise of 20–40 mmHg common)
- Perceptual disturbances
- No driving on dosing day: Patient requires escort
- ETASU certification: Healthcare settings must register with the REMS programme
- Pregnancy registry: Women of childbearing age
Why REMS? Abuse potential (Schedule III), dissociation risk, BP elevation risk, not safe for unsupervised self-administration.
Administration Protocol
- Induction: 56 mg or 84 mg twice weekly × 4 weeks
- Maintenance Phase 1: Once weekly × 4 weeks
- Maintenance Phase 2: Once weekly or every 2 weeks thereafter
- Taken as 2 × 28 mg devices (one nostril each), 5 minutes apart
Place in Therapy
Advantages over IV ketamine:
- FDA-approved (ketamine: off-label)
- Standardised dose and route
- REMS monitoring built-in
- S-enantiomer: more potent at NMDA receptor per mg
Limitations:
- Does not replace ongoing antidepressant treatment
- Duration of effect limited (days to weeks per infusion session)
- Cost: ~$800–900 per treatment session
- Long-term maintenance data still accumulating
- High rates of dissociation at each session
ANSWER 04
Describe the pharmacology of newer antipsychotics with particular reference to cariprazine and lumateperone. What is the clinical significance of D3 receptor selectivity? (10 marks)
Introduction
Third-generation antipsychotics have moved beyond simple D2 blockade toward receptor-selective approaches that target specific dopamine receptor subtypes and multiple neurotransmitter systems. Cariprazine and lumateperone represent two distinct advances in this evolution.
Cariprazine, D3-Selective Partial Agonist
Receptor profile:
| Receptor | Action | Clinical Significance |
|---|---|---|
| D2 | Partial agonist | Antipsychotic effect, low EPS |
| D3 | High-affinity partial agonist (20× selectivity over D2) | Negative symptom improvement |
| 5-HT1A | Partial agonist | Anxiolysis, reduced EPS |
| 5-HT2A | Antagonist | Antidepressant synergy |
| 5-HT2B | Antagonist | Cardiac safety |
Clinical significance of D3 selectivity:
D3 receptors are concentrated in the mesolimbic system, prefrontal cortex, and hippocampus, regions governing reward, motivation, and cognition. Negative symptoms of schizophrenia (avolition, alogia, anhedonia) are linked to hypodopaminergic tone in these circuits.
Partial D3 agonism is proposed to:
- Restore reward salience (reduced avolition)
- Improve working memory (PFC D3 modulation)
- Reduce anhedonia
RCH-MD-16 study: Cariprazine 3–6 mg demonstrated statistically significant superiority over risperidone 3–6 mg on PANSS negative symptom factor scores, a landmark finding, as no previous drug had shown this against an active comparator.
Pharmacokinetics: Active metabolites (DCAR and DDCAR) have a combined effective half-life of 2–4 weeks. Clinical implication: drug effects persist weeks after discontinuation.
Clinical use:
- Schizophrenia: 1.5–6 mg/day (negative symptom benefit at 3 mg)
- Bipolar mania: 3–6 mg/day
- Bipolar depression: 1.5–3 mg/day (only antipsychotic effective at sub-mania doses for bipolar depression)
Adverse effects: Akathisia (highest among newer APs), weight gain (moderate), metabolic effects (moderate).
Lumateperone, Multimodal Novel Mechanism
Receptor profile:
What makes lumateperone truly novel:
- D1 agonism in the PFC: While all other antipsychotics either block or have no activity at D1, lumateperone activates prefrontal D1 receptors. This is predicted to improve cognition and negative symptoms.
- Dual D2 activity: Pre-synaptic agonism normalises dopamine synthesis in hypo-dopaminergic states (relevant for negative/cognitive symptoms); post-synaptic antagonism reduces excessive mesolimbic signalling (relevant for positive symptoms).
- SERT inhibition: Contributes to antidepressant and mood-stabilising properties, explains bipolar depression efficacy.
- NMDA NR2B modulation: Reduces excitotoxic glutamate signalling, a mechanism shared with ketamine, potentially explaining mood and cognitive benefits.
Clinical evidence:
- Schizophrenia: Phase III trials (ITT-301, -302) showing significant PANSS reduction vs placebo
- Bipolar I depression AND Bipolar II depression: Multiple RCTs positive, one of very few drugs approved for both
- Weight-neutral in clinical trials, a practical advantage over most APs
Dosing: 42 mg once daily (no titration required)
Comparison
| Feature | Cariprazine | Lumateperone |
|---|---|---|
| Key mechanism | D3 selectivity | D1 agonism + dual D2 + SERT |
| Negative symptoms | Strong evidence | Promising |
| Bipolar depression | Yes (1.5–3 mg) | Yes (I + II) |
| Weight | Moderate gain | Weight-neutral |
| Akathisia | HIGH risk | LOW risk |
| Titration | Required | Not required |
ANSWER 05
Discuss lithium pharmacology, monitoring, toxicity management, and use in pregnancy. (10 marks)
Introduction
Lithium remains the most evidence-based mood stabiliser for bipolar disorder after more than 70 years of clinical use. It is the only psychiatric drug with Level I evidence for suicide prevention in bipolar disorder, and the only drug with proven anti-suicidal effects independent of mood stabilisation.
Pharmacology
Mechanisms of action (multiple, interacting):
- Inositol depletion: Inhibits inositol monophosphatase and bisphosphatase → depletes inositol from hyperactive neural circuits → selectively dampens overactive phosphoinositide signalling (the "inositol depletion hypothesis").
- GSK-3β inhibition: Glycogen synthase kinase-3β is a key regulator of neuronal apoptosis, neurogenesis, and synaptic plasticity. Lithium inhibition → neuroprotective, reduces apoptosis, promotes BDNF.
- Serotonin potentiation: Increases synthesis and release of 5-HT → basis for augmentation of antidepressants and anti-suicidal effect.
- HDAC inhibition: Epigenetic mechanism, histone deacetylase inhibition → altered gene expression → long-term neuroprotection.
- Anti-glutamatergic: Reduces NMDA receptor-mediated excitotoxicity.
Pharmacokinetics:
- Oral absorption: 100% (complete)
- No protein binding, no hepatic metabolism
- Distribution: total body water
- Renal excretion (competes with sodium reabsorption in proximal tubule)
- Half-life: ~24 hours (acute); 36–48 hours (chronic)
- Steady-state: 5–7 days
Narrow therapeutic index: This drives the mandatory monitoring protocol.
Monitoring Protocol
Baseline investigations:
- Renal function: creatinine, BUN, eGFR, urinalysis
- Thyroid: TSH, FT4
- Serum calcium (parathyroid effects)
- ECG (especially >50 years)
- Pregnancy test (women of reproductive age)
- Weight, BMI
Serum level targets (12-hour post-dose sample):
Monitoring frequency:
- Initiation: every 5–7 days until stable
- Stable: monthly × 6 months → every 3–6 months
Long-term monitoring: Renal function (eGFR) annually; TSH annually; calcium annually.
Toxicity
Precipitating factors:
- NSAIDs (reduce renal clearance)
- ACE inhibitors/ARBs (reduce glomerular filtration)
- Thiazide diuretics (sodium loss → lithium retention)
- Dehydration, fever, vomiting
- Renal disease
- Low-sodium diet
Clinical features by level:
Management:
- Stop lithium
- IV normal saline 0.9%, aggressive hydration (promotes renal excretion and corrects sodium deficit)
- Haemodialysis if: level >4 mmol/L; level >2.5 with severe symptoms; severe renal failure
- Activated charcoal: NOT effective
- Sodium polystyrene: limited evidence
- Supportive: seizure management, airway
Use in Pregnancy
Teratogenicity, updated estimates:
Earlier reports dramatically overstated the risk of Ebstein's anomaly (tricuspid valve malformation). A 2017 NEJM cohort study revised the absolute risk:
- Background risk: 6/10,000 births
- With lithium: 21/10,000 births (relative risk ~2.66)
This is a real risk, but much lower than the 1-in-10 figures quoted previously.
Clinical decision framework:
- Women with severe bipolar disorder: lithium may be continued given that untreated mania/depression also poses foetal risks
- Women at lower risk: taper lithium during first trimester; restart after organogenesis
Peripartum management:
- Renal clearance increases in first trimester → levels may fall (increase dose to maintain therapeutic level)
- Post-partum: renal clearance falls → level spikes → REDUCE dose 25–50% at 36–38 weeks, re-titrate after delivery
- Monitor fortnightly in third trimester
Neonatal effects (if continued):
- Neonatal lithium toxicity: hypotonia ("floppy baby"), cyanosis, bradycardia
- Resolve within days as lithium is excreted
Fetal monitoring:
- Anomaly scan with foetal echocardiogram at 16–18 weeks
- Growth scans third trimester
Breastfeeding: Excreted in breast milk at 40–50% of maternal serum level. Generally advised against; if continued, monitor infant lithium levels and renal function.
ANSWER 06
Enumerate and explain the strategies for augmentation of antidepressants in treatment-resistant depression. Which has the strongest evidence base? (10 marks)
Introduction
Treatment-resistant depression (TRD) is conventionally defined as inadequate response to ≥2 adequate antidepressant trials. Approximately 30% of patients with MDD meet this criterion. Augmentation, adding a second agent to an existing antidepressant, is distinct from switching strategies and is the recommended approach when partial response exists.
Augmentation Strategies, Evidence Hierarchy
Tier 1 (Strongest evidence, Level I):
1. Atypical antipsychotic augmentation (FDA-approved combinations)
| Drug | Evidence | Dose for Augmentation |
|---|---|---|
| Aripiprazole | Multiple Phase III RCTs; FDA approved | 2–15 mg/day |
| Quetiapine XR | Multiple Phase III RCTs; FDA approved | 50–300 mg/day |
| Brexpiprazole | Phase III RCTs; FDA approved | 1–3 mg/day |
| Olanzapine + fluoxetine (OFC) | Phase III; FDA approved for bipolar depression | 6/25–12/50 mg |
Mechanism: 5-HT2A antagonism by AP + SERT inhibition by AD → enhanced serotonin throughput; partial D2 agonism → improved motivation and anhedonia (aripiprazole).
2. Lithium augmentation
- Most evidence-based pharmacological augmentation, Level I evidence predating all AP augmentation trials
- Mechanism: enhances serotonin synthesis and release; potentiates 5-HT1A desensitisation
- Target level: 0.5–0.8 mmol/L
- Response rate: ~50% in previously treatment-resistant patients
- Time to response: 2–4 weeks
- NNT: approximately 5
Tier 2 (Good evidence, Level II):
3. Triiodothyronine (T3) augmentation
- Dose: 25–50 mcg/day (sub-replacement)
- Best evidence for TCA augmentation; weaker for SSRIs
- Meta-analysis: 24% response vs 14% placebo
- Mechanism: sensitises serotonin receptors; potentiates TCA activity
4. Mirtazapine added to SSRI/SNRI ("California Rocket Fuel")
- Mechanism: SNRI + NaSSA → combined noradrenergic + serotonergic + histaminergic action
- Evidence: multiple RCTs, generally positive though less robust than AP augmentation
- Practical: mirtazapine's sedation is often used therapeutically for insomnia comorbidity
5. Buspirone augmentation
- 5-HT1A partial agonist, augments SSRI action at autoreceptors
- Level II evidence; less potent than AP augmentation
Tier 3 (Emerging evidence):
6. Esketamine nasal spray
- FDA-approved for TRD (2019)
- Rapid effect (within 24–48 hours), uniquely useful in urgent situations
- Sustained maintenance with regular sessions
7. Thyroid hormone (levothyroxine, T4)
- Weaker evidence than T3 augmentation
8. Lamotrigine augmentation of antidepressants
- Case series and small RCTs; evidence for SSRI + lamotrigine in TRD
- May be particularly useful when bipolar spectrum features are present
9. Pramipexole (D3 agonist)
- Evidence for bipolar II depression and unipolar TRD
- Level II evidence
10. Modafinil/armodafinil
- Augment fatigue and hypersomnia in partial responders
- Does not improve core depression scores significantly
Strongest Evidence
| Rank | Strategy | Level |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lithium augmentation | Level I (decades of RCT evidence) |
| 2 | Atypical AP augmentation (aripiprazole, quetiapine, brexpiprazole) | Level I (FDA approved) |
| 3 | Esketamine | Level I (FDA approved, rapid onset) |
| 4 | T3 augmentation | Level II |
Clinical decision guide: If partial response to SSRI/SNRI → first add atypical AP (if tolerability concern, aripiprazole; if insomnia comorbid, quetiapine; if better side-effect profile needed, brexpiprazole). If metabolic concerns preclude AP → lithium augmentation. If urgent response needed (severe suicidality) → esketamine.
ANSWER 07
Write a pharmacological note on orexin receptor antagonists. Compare the three approved agents. What is their mechanism of action and advantage over traditional hypnotics? (8 marks)
Introduction
Dual orexin receptor antagonists (DORAs) represent a paradigm shift in insomnia pharmacotherapy, from GABAergic sedation to targeted wake-drive suppression. Three agents are currently approved: suvorexant (2014), lemborexant (2019), and daridorexant (2022).
The Orexin System
Orexins (orexin-A/hypocretin-1, orexin-B/hypocretin-2) are neuropeptides produced by ~70,000 neurons in the lateral hypothalamus. They project widely to wake-promoting nuclei:
In narcolepsy (loss of orexin neurons): sudden sleep attacks, cataplexy.
In insomnia: orexin system overactivated → failure to "turn off" wake drive.
DORA mechanism: Simultaneously block OX1R and OX2R → suppress the wake drive without globally suppressing brain activity.
Advantage Over Traditional Hypnotics
| Property | BZDs / Z-drugs (GABA agonists) | DORAs (orexin antagonists) |
|---|---|---|
| Mechanism | Enhance global GABA inhibition | Specifically block wake drive |
| Sleep architecture | Suppress SWS, alter REM | Preserves normal architecture |
| Physical dependence | Yes | No (or minimal) |
| Tolerance | Develops readily | Minimal |
| Rebound insomnia | Significant | Minimal to none |
| Cognitive impairment | Significant | Mild, dose-dependent |
| Next-day sedation | Common | Present but lower (especially daridorexant) |
| Abuse potential | Schedule IV | Schedule IV (but lower perceived abuse) |
| Anterograde amnesia | Yes | Rare |
Comparison of the Three DORAs
| Feature | Suvorexant | Lemborexant | Daridorexant |
|---|---|---|---|
| FDA approval | 2014 | 2019 | 2022 |
| Doses | 10, 20 mg | 5, 10 mg | 25, 50 mg |
| Half-life | ~12h | ~17–27h | ~8h |
| OX2R selectivity | Moderate | Higher | Moderate |
| Key trials | SUNRISE-1/2 | SUNRISE-1/2 + vs zolpidem | ESADA-1/2 (daytime function endpoint) |
| Next-day impairment | Moderate concern | Greater (long T1/2) | Least concern |
| Best use case | General maintenance | Elderly, sleep maintenance | When daytime performance matters |
| CYP3A4 interaction | Significant (reduce to 5 mg with inhibitors) | Significant | Less clinically significant |
| Daytime functioning endpoint | Not primary | Not primary | Yes, primary endpoint in trials |
Suvorexant: First in class, most clinical experience, works for sleep onset and maintenance.
Lemborexant: Better than zolpidem on subjective sleep parameters at 1-month mark; longer half-life beneficial for sleep maintenance but raises next-day concern in some patients.
Daridorexant: Designed from the start with daytime functioning as co-primary endpoint; shortest half-life → best next-day profile.
Safety Notes
- Complex sleep behaviours (sleep-walking, sleep-driving, sleep-eating): Black box warning for all three, although incidence far lower than with Z-drugs.
- Respiratory depression: Minimal effect on respiratory drive (unlike BZDs), relatively safer in mild COPD/OSA. Caution in severe respiratory compromise.
- No abuse potential defined in clinical use patterns.
- Pregnancy: Avoid (insufficient data).
ANSWER 08
Discuss the role of pharmacogenomics in clinical psychiatry with special reference to CYP2D6 and CYP2C19. What is the clinical significance of HLA-B*1502 testing? (8 marks)
Introduction
Pharmacogenomics, the study of how genetic variation affects drug response, offers the promise of "right drug, right dose, right patient." In psychiatry, where drug selection has historically been empirical and trial-and-error, pharmacogenomics provides a biological framework for individualising treatment.
CYP2D6
CYP2D6 is the most clinically relevant enzyme in psychiatric pharmacogenomics, metabolising approximately 25% of all psychotropic drugs.
Phenotype classification:
| Phenotype | Copies of Functional Alleles | Drug Levels | Clinical Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poor metaboliser (PM) | 0 | HIGH | Toxicity at standard doses |
| Intermediate (IM) | 1 (or reduced function) | Moderately high | Increased adverse effects |
| Extensive/normal (EM) | 2 | Normal | Standard dosing |
| Ultrarapid (UM) | >2 (gene duplication) | LOW | Treatment failure |
Ethnic distribution:
- PMs: 7–10% Caucasians; 1–2% Asians; 3–7% Africans
- UMs: 1–2% Caucasians; up to 29% in Ethiopian populations
Key psychiatric CYP2D6 substrates:
- Antidepressants: nortriptyline, desipramine, clomipramine, vortioxetine, paroxetine, fluoxetine
- Antipsychotics: haloperidol, risperidone, aripiprazole, perphenazine
- Opioids: codeine (prodrug, PMs get no analgesia; UMs get excessive morphine)
Important: Paroxetine and fluoxetine are BOTH substrates AND potent inhibitors of CYP2D6. This creates phenoconversion, an EM becomes a functional PM when taking paroxetine.
CYP2C19
Ethnic distribution of PMs:
- 3–5% Caucasians
- 15–20% Asian populations (particularly Japanese, Chinese)
Key psychiatric substrates:
- Citalopram, escitalopram (PMs have elevated levels → QTc concern)
- Sertraline
- Diazepam, clonazepam
- Venlafaxine, amitriptyline
Clinical application: CYP2C19 PMs should receive lower doses of citalopram/escitalopram, the FDA already recommends a maximum 20 mg/day for CYP2C19 PMs based on QTc risk.
HLA-B*1502 and Carbamazepine
Background:
- Carbamazepine causes Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN), life-threatening mucocutaneous reactions, in rare individuals
- In 2004, a Taiwanese study demonstrated that nearly 100% of Han Chinese patients who developed SJS on carbamazepine carried the HLA-B*1502 allele
Allele frequency:
- Han Chinese: ~8–10%
- Thai, Filipino, Malaysian: 6–8%
- South Asian (Indian subcontinent): ~2–4% (varies significantly by region)
- Europeans: <1%
- Japanese: rare
Mechanism: HLA-B*1502 presents carbamazepine metabolites as neoantigens to cytotoxic T-cells → explosive T-cell activation → cutaneous cell death.
FDA mandate: Test for HLA-B*1502 before initiating carbamazepine in patients of Asian ancestry. If positive → DO NOT use carbamazepine.
India relevance:
- Indian Pharmacopoeia and CDSCO guidelines recommend HLA-B*1502 testing before carbamazepine
- Risk is real but lower than East Asian populations
- Oxcarbazepine also carries risk in HLA-B*1502 carriers
HLA-A*3101:
- Associated with carbamazepine hypersensitivity in European and Japanese populations
- Causes SJS, DRESS (Drug Reaction with Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms), and maculopapular exanthema
- Lower penetrance than B*1502 for severe reactions but broader population relevance in Europeans
Clinical decision algorithm:
ANSWER 09
Classify and discuss drug interactions in psychiatry. Which combinations are potentially fatal? How do you manage a patient who requires both an MAOI and SSRI? (8 marks)
Introduction
Drug interactions in psychiatry are clinically significant because polypharmacy is common, psychiatric drugs have narrow therapeutic windows, and many interactions can be fatal. Interactions are classified as pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic.
Classification
A. Pharmacokinetic Interactions (affect drug levels)
- Absorption: Antacids reduce absorption of many psychotropics (less clinically significant)
- Distribution: Displacement from protein binding (valproate + aspirin)
- Metabolism (most important):
- CYP450 inhibition → increased levels of substrate
- CYP450 induction → decreased levels of substrate
- Phase II (glucuronidation): valproate inhibits UGT → increases lamotrigine levels 2-fold
- Excretion:
- Lithium: renal excretion manipulated by NSAIDs, diuretics, ACE inhibitors
- Renally cleared drugs affected by renal function changes
B. Pharmacodynamic Interactions (affect drug effects)
- Additive: Two CNS depressants → excessive sedation
- Synergistic: MAOI + SSRI → serotonin syndrome
- Antagonistic: Anticholinergic drugs reduce effect of procognitive agents
Potentially Fatal Combinations
| Combination | Mechanism | Risk |
|---|---|---|
| MAOI + SSRI/SNRI | Serotonin syndrome | FATAL |
| MAOI + tramadol/meperidine | Serotonin syndrome | FATAL |
| Clozapine + carbamazepine | Additive agranulocytosis + reduced levels | CONTRAINDICATED |
| Lithium + NSAIDs + dehydration | Lithium toxicity → encephalopathy | FATAL if severe |
| Clozapine + IM benzodiazepine | Respiratory collapse | DEATH reported |
| Haloperidol + QTc-prolonging drugs | Torsades de pointes → VF | FATAL |
| Pimozide/thioridazine + CYP inhibitors | QTc prolongation → TdP | FATAL |
High-Risk Combinations: Detailed
Lithium + NSAIDs:
- Mechanism: NSAIDs inhibit renal prostaglandins → reduced renal blood flow → lithium retention
- Magnitude: 50–100% increase in lithium levels
- Management: Avoid; if unavoidable, reduce lithium dose 25–50%, monitor levels in 3–5 days, advise patient about dehydration risk
Clozapine + carbamazepine:
- Dual risk: carbamazepine independently causes agranulocytosis + induces CYP1A2 → reduces clozapine levels
- Absolutely contraindicated
- Alternative mood stabiliser: valproate (preferred with clozapine)
Fluvoxamine + clozapine:
- Fluvoxamine is a potent CYP1A2 inhibitor → can increase clozapine levels 2–10 fold
- Inadvertent prescribing can cause clozapine toxicity (seizures, respiratory depression)
- Some clinicians exploit this intentionally: low-dose fluvoxamine (25–50 mg/day) to increase clozapine levels while using lower clozapine doses (reduces metabolic burden)
Managing a Patient Requiring Both MAOI and SSRI
This situation should be avoided if at all possible. However, if sequential use is required:
Standard washout:
Stopping SSRI → starting MAOI:
- Fluoxetine: 5-week washout (long half-life + active norfluoxetine ~14 days)
- Other SSRIs/SNRIs: 2-week washout
- Venlafaxine: 2-week washout
Stopping MAOI → starting SSRI:
- ALL MAOIs: 2-week washout minimum
- Phenelzine and tranylcypromine irreversible: 3-week washout often recommended in practice
Why the asymmetry? Fluoxetine's extremely long active metabolite half-life means it can still be present 5 weeks after the last dose, still capable of causing SS if combined with MAOI.
Practical scenario: Patient stable on SSRI, needs to switch to MAOI-class antidepressant.
- Stop SSRI (use 5-week washout for fluoxetine, 2 weeks for others)
- During washout: bridge with psychotherapy, sleep hygiene, PRN benzodiazepines for anxiety
- Monitor for withdrawal syndrome (reinstate briefly if severe)
- Begin MAOI at minimum dose after washout period
Emergency situation (patient critically unwell): Hospitalise, use ECT as bridge. Do NOT overlap serotoninergic agents.
ANSWER 10
What is neuroleptic malignant syndrome? Discuss its pathophysiology, clinical features, management, and guidelines for antipsychotic re-challenge. (10 marks)
Introduction
Neuroleptic malignant syndrome (NMS) is a rare, life-threatening idiosyncratic reaction to dopamine-blocking agents, characterised by the tetrad of hyperthermia, rigidity, altered consciousness, and autonomic instability. Before the introduction of active management protocols, mortality was 25–30%. With current management, mortality is approximately 5–10%.
Pathophysiology
NMS results from abrupt or excessive dopamine D2 receptor blockade across three anatomical domains:
- Striatum: D2 blockade → loss of dopaminergic modulation of extrapyramidal motor system → lead-pipe rigidity
- Hypothalamus: Dopamine normally inhibits the heat-dissipating mechanisms; D2 block → thermoregulatory failure → hyperthermia
- Mesocortical/mesolimbic pathways: D2 blockade → altered consciousness, confusion, stupor
Precipitating factors:
- High-potency typical antipsychotics (haloperidol most implicated)
- Rapid dose escalation
- IM depot injections
- Dehydration
- Agitation (metabolic demand increases muscle heat production)
- Physical restraint
- Ambient heat
- Prior NMS episode (strongest predictor, 10–15x increased risk)
- Young male patients
- Underlying brain pathology
Clinical Features
Cardinal tetrad:
- Hyperthermia: Temperature >38°C (often >40°C, sometimes >42°C)
- Muscle rigidity: Lead-pipe rigidity (unlike clonus in SS), generalised, severe, can cause rhabdomyolysis from sustained contraction
- Altered consciousness: Confusion → obtundation → stupor → coma
- Autonomic instability: Tachycardia, labile blood pressure (oscillates, hyper and hypotensive episodes), tachypnoea, diaphoresis, sialorrhea, incontinence
Laboratory findings:
- CK: Very elevated, often >1000 U/L, can reach >50,000 U/L
- Leukocytosis: 10,000–40,000/mm³
- Metabolic acidosis
- Elevated LFTs
- Myoglobinuria → risk of acute kidney injury
- Low serum iron (<12 μmol/L), specific marker for NMS, useful diagnostically
- Elevated ESR, CRP
Onset: Hours to days after drug initiation or dose change (unlike SS which develops within hours)
Duration: 1–2 weeks without treatment; shorter with dantrolene/bromocriptine
DSM-5 Diagnostic Criteria
Development of severe muscle rigidity and elevated temperature following antipsychotic exposure, PLUS ≥2 of: diaphoresis, dysphagia, tremor, incontinence, altered consciousness, mutism, tachycardia, elevated/labile BP, leukocytosis, elevated CK, in the absence of an alternative medical/neurological explanation.
Management
Immediate steps:
- Stop antipsychotic (and all other dopaminergic agents including metoclopramide)
- ICU admission
- IV fluid resuscitation (prevent renal failure from myoglobinuria)
- Cooling measures (cooling blankets, ice packs to axillae/groin, NOT antipyretics which are ineffective)
- Monitor: temperature, vitals, CK, renal function, urine myoglobin
Pharmacological:
| Drug | Mechanism | Dose |
|---|---|---|
| Dantrolene | Blocks SR calcium release → reduces muscle contraction → lowers rigidity + temperature | 0.25–2 mg/kg IV q6–12h; oral 50–200 mg/day maintenance |
| Bromocriptine | D2 agonist → reverses central D2 blockade | 2.5–10 mg TID (oral/NG) |
| Amantadine | DA release + NMDA antagonism | 100–200 mg BD |
| Lorazepam | Muscle relaxation, sedation, anti-catatonic | 1–2 mg IV q4–6h |
ECT: For refractory NMS or when malignant catatonia cannot be excluded. ECT has both diagnostic and therapeutic utility in this context.
Antipsychotic Re-challenge
When indicated: Patient has psychotic illness with no alternative to antipsychotic treatment, NMS has fully resolved.
Contraindications to re-challenge:
- NMS within the past 2 weeks
- Persistent fever, rigidity, or elevated CK
- Patient's refusal with informed consent
- Malignant catatonia (alternative diagnosis, ECT is first-line)
Protocol:
- Wait minimum 2 weeks after NMS resolution (ANC and CK normalised; some sources recommend 4–6 weeks)
- Choose lowest-potency atypical antipsychotic (clozapine, quetiapine, or olanzapine)
- Start at very low dose with slow titration
- Avoid precipitating factors: ensure adequate hydration, avoid IM depots initially
- Close monitoring: daily temperature and vitals for first 2 weeks
- Written informed consent documenting recurrence risk (~10–15%)
Best evidence for re-challenge without recurrence:
- Clozapine: multiple case reports of successful re-challenge
- Quetiapine: low D2 affinity, low recurrence risk
ANSWER 11
Discuss the pharmacology, monitoring, and practical prescribing of long-acting injectable antipsychotics. What are the clinical advantages and disadvantages compared to oral formulations? (8 marks)
Introduction
Long-acting injectable antipsychotics (LAIs) address the single most important modifiable factor in schizophrenia outcomes, medication non-adherence. Non-adherence affects 50–70% of patients with schizophrenia within the first year of treatment. LAIs eliminate covert non-adherence, reduce the daily decision burden, and provide pharmacokinetic stability.
Available LAI Formulations
| Drug | Name | Frequency |
|---|---|---|
| Fluphenazine decanoate | Modecate | 2–6 weeks |
| Haloperidol decanoate | 4 weeks | |
| Zuclopenthixol decanoate | Clopixol Depot | 2–4 weeks |
| Risperidone microspheres | Risperdal Consta | 2 weeks |
| Paliperidone palmitate 1-month | Invega Sustenna | Monthly |
| Paliperidone palmitate 3-month | Invega Trinza | 3-monthly |
| Paliperidone palmitate 6-month | Invega Hafyera | 6-monthly |
| Aripiprazole monohydrate | Abilify Maintena | Monthly |
| Aripiprazole lauroxil | Aristada | 4–8 weeks |
| Olanzapine pamoate | Zypadhera | 2–4 weeks |
Pharmacological Principles of LAIs
Mechanism of prolonged action:
- Decanoate esters (haloperidol, fluphenazine): esterified drug dissolved in sesame oil → released slowly from injection site → cleaved by esterases → active drug
- Microspheres (risperidone): drug encapsulated in biodegradable polymer → gradual release
- Nanocrystal suspension (paliperidone palmitate): water-insoluble nanocrystals → very slow dissolution
Pharmacokinetic advantages of LAIs:
- Eliminate first-pass metabolism (higher relative bioavailability for some drugs)
- Stable plasma levels without peaks (oral) or troughs (missed doses)
- Plasma level predicts dose adjustment, clinician can titrate based on measured levels
PP3M (Paliperidone Palmitate 3-Monthly), Key Exam Focus
Prerequisites for switching from PP1M to PP3M:
- Adequately treated with PP1M for ≥4 months
- Last two PP1M doses must be at the same dose level
- Dose conversion: PP3M = 3.5 × PP1M dose
PP3M doses available: 175 mg, 263 mg, 350 mg, 525 mg (corresponding to PP1M 39, 78, 117, 156 mg)
Clinical Advantages of LAIs
Meta-analytic evidence: Kishimoto et al. (2014), 25 RCTs, LAIs significantly reduced all-cause discontinuation and relapse vs oral.
Disadvantages and Practical Challenges
Monitoring Protocol for LAIs
- Document last oral antipsychotic dose and timing
- Weight, metabolic panel at baseline and 3-monthly
- EPS assessment at each visit
- Prolactin if symptoms (risperidone/paliperidone: cause significant prolactin elevation)
- Document injection site, lot number, expiry
- Ensure patient is aware of washout and carry-over effects before stopping
ANSWER 12
Discuss psilocybin-assisted therapy: mechanism of action, clinical evidence, and current regulatory status in psychiatry. (8 marks)
Introduction
Psilocybin is a classic serotonergic psychedelic compound derived from Psilocybe mushroom species. After decades of prohibition following the Controlled Substances Act of 1970, it has re-emerged as a genuinely promising treatment for several psychiatric conditions. Its mechanism differs fundamentally from all currently approved psychiatric medications.
Mechanism of Action
Primary: Psilocybin is dephosphorylated to psilocin by alkaline phosphatase (liver, small intestine, blood). Psilocin is the active compound.
Receptor actions:
- 5-HT2A agonist (primary): binding in prefrontal cortex, thalamus, anterior cingulate cortex, and limbic system
- 5-HT2C agonist: contributes to subjective effects
- 5-HT1A: some affinity
Neural mechanisms:
- Default Mode Network (DMN) disruption: The DMN (medial PFC, posterior cingulate, angular gyrus) is hyper-connected in depression, OCD, addiction. Psilocin disrupts DMN connectivity → ego dissolution → reduced self-referential rumination.
- Global brain connectivity increase: Psilocin causes a transient hyperconnected brain state, regions that do not normally communicate become temporarily linked. This "breaking of habits" may be the substrate for lasting psychological change.
- Neuroplasticity: 5-HT2A agonism → BDNF release → TrkB-mTOR activation → synaptic plasticity. New dendritic spines form within 24 hours and persist for weeks.
- Psychological "reset": The mystical/peak experience reliably produced at therapeutic doses correlates strongly with therapeutic outcomes, suggesting the subjective experience itself is therapeutic, not just the pharmacology.
Clinical Evidence
| Condition | Study | Finding |
|---|---|---|
| TRD | COMPASS Phase 2b (N=233) | 25 mg: 29% remission at 3 weeks; dose-dependent response |
| MDD | Johns Hopkins (N=24, JAMA Psychiatry 2021) | 71% response, 54% remission at 4 weeks; effects at 1 year |
| Cancer existential distress | NYU + JHU (N=80, double-blind RCT) | 60–80% sustained response at 6 months; single dose |
| Alcohol use disorder | Trial data (Bogenschutz et al.) | Reduced heavy drinking days; large effect sizes |
| Smoking cessation | JHU pilot | 67% abstinence at 12 months vs ~30% with varenicline |
| OCD | Yale pilot | Symptom reduction in all 9 participants; dose-dependent |
Adverse effects:
- Transient: headache, nausea, dizziness, anxiety during session
- Challenging experiences ("bad trips"): managed by therapist presence
- HPPD (Hallucinogen Persisting Perception Disorder): rare (<1%)
- No withdrawal syndrome, no physical dependence
Contraindications:
- Personal or first-degree family history of schizophrenia or bipolar I (manic episodes)
- Acute psychosis
- Unstable cardiac disease
- Pregnancy
- Concurrent lithium (seizure risk reported)
Therapeutic Model
Psilocybin is NOT a standalone drug, it is psilocybin-assisted psychotherapy:
- Preparation sessions (2–3): Build therapeutic alliance, set intentions, reduce anticipatory anxiety
- Drug session (1–3 sessions): Supervised in a comfortable environment; music, eye shades; therapist present throughout
- Integration sessions (2–4): Processing the experience; applying insights to life; CBT-like work
The set (psychological state), setting (physical environment), and therapeutic relationship are considered pharmacologically relevant.
Regulatory Status (2026)
Outlook: Phase III trial results expected 2025–2026; FDA decision likely by 2027–2028.
ANSWER 13
Discuss the clinical pharmacology of brexanolone and zuranolone for postpartum depression. What is the mechanism of action and how do they differ from conventional antidepressants? (8 marks)
Introduction
Postpartum depression (PPD) affects 10–15% of postpartum women. Until 2019, it was treated with the same antidepressants used for MDD, which take 4–8 weeks to act, cross into breast milk, and do not address the peripartum-specific neurobiological mechanism. Brexanolone (2019) and zuranolone (2023) are the first drugs targeting the specific pathophysiology of PPD.
The Peripartum Neurobiological Hypothesis
During pregnancy:
- Progesterone levels rise massively (×100 above baseline)
- Progesterone is metabolised to allopregnanolone (3α-hydroxy-5α-pregnan-20-one)
- Allopregnanolone is a potent positive allosteric modulator of GABA-A receptors
- Chronically elevated allopregnanolone → GABA-A receptor adaptations (downregulation, subunit changes)
At delivery:
- Progesterone and allopregnanolone fall precipitously within 24–48 hours
- GABA-A receptors, adapted to high allopregnanolone, are suddenly deprived
- Neuronal excitability surges → PPD in vulnerable individuals
The vulnerability model: Women with PPD may have GABA-A receptors that respond abnormally to allopregnanolone fluctuations, a trait rather than purely a state phenomenon.
Brexanolone (Zulresso)
Class: Synthetic allopregnanolone (neuroactive steroid)
Approval: FDA 2019, first drug specifically approved for PPD
Mechanism: Positive allosteric modulation of both:
- Synaptic GABA-A receptors (γ2-subunit containing): phasic inhibition
- Extrasynaptic GABA-A receptors (δ-subunit containing): tonic inhibition
The extrasynaptic GABA-A modulation is particularly important, these receptors, largely concentrated in limbic and corticolimbic regions, mediate sustained inhibitory tone. Allopregnanolone (and brexanolone) are among the only endogenous/exogenous substances that modulate extrasynaptic GABA-A at physiological concentrations.
Administration:
- IV infusion over 60 hours (2.5 days), continuous
- Hospital admission required
- Doses: 30 mcg/kg/hour for 4 hours → 60 mcg/kg/hour for 20 hours → 90 mcg/kg/hour for 28 hours → taper down
REMS requirements:
- Administered only in certified healthcare facilities
- Risk: excessive sedation and sudden loss of consciousness
- Continuous oxygen saturation monitoring
- Patient must be accompanied when discharged
Clinical evidence:
- HUMMINGBIRD trial: 73.7% Hamilton Depression Rating Scale response at 60 hours (vs 47.8% placebo)
- 94 hours post-infusion: 83.3% response rate vs 64.5% placebo
- Effect sustained at 30 days
Limitations: IV only, 60-hour infusion, cost ~USD 34,000, requires hospitalisation, limited global availability.
Zuranolone (Zurzuvae)
Class: Same mechanism as brexanolone (neuroactive steroid, GABA-A PAM), but oral
Approval: FDA August 2023, first oral neuroactive steroid for both MDD and PPD
Pharmacokinetics:
- Oral bioavailability: moderate-high (better with fatty meal)
- Half-life: ~16–19 hours
- CYP3A4 metabolism
- Dose: 30 mg or 50 mg once daily at bedtime for 14 days
Clinical evidence:
- ROBIN trial (PPD): 50 mg zuranolone → significant reduction in HAMD-17 at Day 15
- LANDSCAPE/SHORELINE (MDD): Both trials positive
- Onset: significant separation from placebo within 3 days
No REMS required, can be prescribed from pharmacy for home use
Comparison with Conventional Antidepressants
| Feature | SSRIs/SNRIs | Brexanolone | Zuranolone |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mechanism | Monoamine reuptake | GABA-A PAM | GABA-A PAM |
| Onset | 4–8 weeks | 24–48 hours | 3 days |
| PPD-specific | No | Yes | Yes |
| Route | Oral | IV (60h) | Oral (14 days) |
| Breast milk | Yes (generally low) | Minimal data | Avoid breastfeeding |
| Driving restriction | Minimal | Yes (hospital stay) | Yes (8 hours post-dose) |
| Discontinuation syndrome | Yes (SSRIs) | No | No |
| Treating postpartum neuro | No | Yes (directly) | Yes (directly) |
ANSWER 14
Discuss discontinuation syndromes in psychiatry: focusing on SSRI discontinuation, benzodiazepine withdrawal, and antipsychotic supersensitivity psychosis. How do you manage each? (10 marks)
Introduction
Discontinuation syndromes arise when drugs that alter receptor density, signalling cascades, or neurotransmitter homeostasis are stopped. They differ from drug withdrawal in mechanism (not mediated by physical dependence per se) but share clinical urgency. In psychiatry, three syndromes are clinically most important: SSRI discontinuation, benzodiazepine withdrawal, and antipsychotic supersensitivity psychosis.
1. SSRI Discontinuation Syndrome
Pathophysiology:
Chronic SSRI use → adaptive changes in serotonin receptors (down-regulation of 5-HT1A, up-regulation of post-synaptic receptors) + serotonin transporter upregulation. Abrupt withdrawal → sudden reduction in synaptic serotonin → transient serotonergic deficit.
FINISH mnemonic:
- Flu-like symptoms: malaise, myalgia, lethargy
- Insomnia, vivid dreams/nightmares
- Nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea
- Imbalance: dizziness, ataxia, vertigo
- Sensory: electric shock sensations (paraesthesias, "brain zaps"), pathognomonic
- Hyperarousal: anxiety, irritability, agitation
Onset and duration:
- Short half-life drugs (paroxetine, venlafaxine): within 24–48 hours of stopping; duration 1–2 weeks
- Longer half-life (sertraline, escitalopram): 2–4 days; usually milder
- Fluoxetine: rarely causes syndrome due to ~4-6 day half-life + norfluoxetine active metabolite
Risk by drug:
Paroxetine > Venlafaxine > Sertraline > Escitalopram > Fluoxetine (lowest risk)
Management:
- Gradual taper: Reduce by 25% every 1–2 weeks minimum. For long-term use (>2 years): taper over months.
- If syndrome has started: reinstate at half the previous dose, stabilise for 2–4 weeks, then taper more slowly
- Switch to fluoxetine 20 mg (self-tapering due to long half-life), taper fluoxetine over 2–4 weeks
- Liquid formulations (sertraline oral solution): enable micro-taper protocols (the Horowitz/Taylor method: hyperbolic taper)
- Inform patient: distinguish from relapse of depression (SSRI discontinuation ≠ return of depression, but can be confused)
2. Benzodiazepine Withdrawal Syndrome
Pathophysiology:
Chronic BZD → GABA-A receptor downregulation + subunit composition changes (from γ2 to δ subunits) + compensatory NMDA upregulation. Withdrawal → generalised CNS excitability.
Clinical features:
- Mild: anxiety, insomnia, tremor, sweating, irritability, hypersensitivity to sensory stimuli
- Moderate: tachycardia, hypertension, perceptual disturbances (visual/auditory)
- Severe: grand mal seizures, delirium (benzodiazepine withdrawal delirium)
Life-threatening: Benzodiazepine withdrawal (like alcohol withdrawal) can cause death. This is NOT the case with most other psychotropic drugs.
Timeline:
- Short-acting (lorazepam, oxazepam, alprazolam): onset 12–24 hours; peak 36–72 hours
- Long-acting (diazepam, clonazepam): onset 3–4 days; peak 5–7 days; prolonged course
Protracted withdrawal syndrome: Anxiety, insomnia, cognitive fog persisting for months, true or psychological?; evidence supports neurobiological basis in some patients.
Management:
- Substitution: Convert all short-acting BZDs to equivalent diazepam dose (or chlordiazepoxide)
- Example: Lorazepam 4 mg/day = diazepam ~40 mg/day
- Gradual taper: 10% reduction every 1–2 weeks (Ashton Protocol)
- For high-dose long-term users: may take 6–18 months
- Adjuncts:
- Carbamazepine or valproate: reduce seizure risk, improve completion rates
- Propranolol: autonomic symptoms
- Hydroxyzine, pregabalin: adjunct anxiolytics
- Flumazenil infusion: specialist use only for protracted withdrawal
- Inpatient if: high dose, history of seizures, concurrent alcohol dependence, medical comorbidity
3. Antipsychotic Discontinuation, Supersensitivity Psychosis
Pathophysiology:
Chronic D2 receptor blockade → compensatory D2 receptor upregulation (increase in number and sensitivity). Abrupt discontinuation → dopaminergic rebound → florid psychosis even in patients who may not have had psychosis as primary presentation.
Features:
- Rapid onset: hours to days after discontinuation (distinguishes from relapse of underlying illness)
- Severity: often more severe and atypical than original episode
- Features: hallucinations, agitation, excitement, often more florid than original illness
- Can occur even after gradual taper if years of AP exposure
Distinguishing from relapse:
- Supersensitivity: onset within days; very rapid; may be atypical symptoms
- Relapse: onset over weeks to months; similar to original presentation
Cholinergic rebound:
- Stopping low-potency APs (clozapine, quetiapine) with high anticholinergic properties
- Features: nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea, headache, insomnia within 24–48 hours
Management:
- Prevention: Gradual taper is mandatory, never abrupt for long-term AP users
- Minimum taper: 3–6 months for decade-long use; some sources recommend hyperbolic taper
- Clozapine: even slower, 6–12 months taper
- If supersensitivity has occurred: Reinstate AP promptly (do not wait)
- If AP reinstatement fails: different AP class; consider clozapine
- Manage cholinergic rebound: antiemetics, symptomatic treatment for 1–2 weeks
ANSWER 15
Write a critical note on rational prescribing and deprescribing in psychiatric practice. What constitutes irrational polypharmacy? (8 marks)
Introduction
Polypharmacy in psychiatry is a double-edged reality. Evidence-based combinations exist and save lives (lithium augmentation, clozapine + lamotrigine). Irrational polypharmacy, adding drugs reflexively, defensively, or due to inertia, harms patients through adverse effects, drug interactions, reduced adherence, and increased cost.
Rational Polypharmacy, Evidence-Based Combinations
| Combination | Clinical Basis | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| SSRI + aripiprazole | Augmentation for TRD | Level I, FDA approved |
| SSRI + quetiapine | TRD augmentation + insomnia | Level I, FDA approved |
| Lithium + antidepressant | TRD | Level I |
| Olanzapine + fluoxetine | Bipolar depression | Level I, FDA approved |
| Clozapine + lamotrigine | Ultra-treatment-resistant schizophrenia | Level II, multiple RCTs |
| Valproate + antipsychotic | Acute mania with agitation | Level I |
| SSRI + buspirone | Anxiety-predominant depression | Level II |
Irrational Polypharmacy, Definitions and Examples
Irrational polypharmacy is defined as the concurrent use of multiple drugs without adequate clinical justification, where:
- The evidence does not support the combination
- The combination adds risk without proportionate benefit
- The combination resulted from sequential addition without review ("prescribing cascade")
- The combination creates dangerous interactions
Examples:
- Two antipsychotics simultaneously (excluding specific combinations): Meta-analyses show no benefit over optimised monotherapy for most combinations. Exception: clozapine augmentation with amisulpride/aripiprazole, some RCT evidence.
- Two drugs from the same class: Two SSRIs, two SNRIs, no clinical rationale; additive adverse effects and serotonin toxicity risk.
- Unnecessary anticholinergic drugs: Procyclidine or trihexyphenidyl prescribed for EPS that has resolved, patient continues on it for years. Results in cognitive impairment, constipation, urinary retention in elderly.
- Benzodiazepine + Z-drug: Additive CNS depression without additive efficacy; both work on GABA-A.
- Prescribing cascade: Drug A causes side effect → Drug B added to treat side effect → Drug B causes new side effect → Drug C added...
- The "defensive add-on": A drug is added "just in case" without evidence-based indication. Example: standing lorazepam added indefinitely after acute agitation episode.
Principles of Deprescribing
Deprescribing is the planned, supervised reduction or discontinuation of medications that are no longer needed, causing harm, or where benefit-risk ratio has shifted.
STOPP/START criteria (Ireland): Widely used tool, STOPP identifies potentially inappropriate prescriptions; START identifies omissions.
Five-step deprescribing process:
- Reconcile: Comprehensive medication review, list ALL drugs, doses, durations, indications
- Identify targets: Highest risk/lowest benefit first (anticholinergics in elderly, long-term BZDs, redundant antipsychotics)
- Assess feasibility: Can this drug be stopped? What is the taper plan?
- Patient engagement: Shared decision-making, patient must agree and understand withdrawal risk
- Monitor: Explicit review date after each deprescription
Specific deprescribing in psychiatry:
| Drug Class | When to Deprescribe | Method |
|---|---|---|
| Benzodiazepines | After 4 weeks of use; dependency established | Ashton Protocol, slow diazepam taper |
| Anticholinergics | EPS resolved or not present | Gradual reduction, check for recurrence |
| Antipsychotics in dementia | After 3 months of behavioural stabilisation | 25–50% dose reduction; monitor for 2 weeks |
| Sedative ADs (mirtazapine for sleep) | Sleep hygiene now adequate | 25% taper every 2 weeks |
| Mood stabilisers in stable bipolar | After 5+ years remission (high controversy) | Only with full patient understanding of relapse risk |
Monitoring After Deprescription
- Explicit withdrawal monitoring schedule
- Patient and family education on discontinuation syndrome features vs relapse features
- Clear re-entry plan if needed
- Documentation of reason for deprescription (legal protection)
Mnemonics & Memory Tricks
15+ Mnemonics
MNEMONIC 01
FINISH: SSRI Discontinuation Syndrome
How to use it: Any question about SSRI discontinuation asks for this triad. The sensory "brain zaps" are the only truly pathognomonic feature, nothing else causes them.
Risk order (high to low): Paroxetine > Venlafaxine > Sertraline > Escitalopram > Fluoxetine
Memory hook: "Parrots Vomit Suddenly; Eventually Fine"
MNEMONIC 02
FEVER: NMS Core Features
Companion memory: NMS = "Never Move Suddenly" (Neuroleptic / Malignant / Syndrome)
CK elevation + lead-pipe rigidity = NMS
Clonus + hyperreflexia = Serotonin Syndrome
MNEMONIC 03
CLONUS: Serotonin Syndrome vs NMS Differentiator
The single most important differentiating sign:
Full Hunter Criteria trigger: "Spontaneous Inducible Ocular Tremor Hypertonia"
SIOTHS, each needs clonus or hyperreflexia present
- Spontaneous clonus → SS
- Inducible clonus + agitation/diaphoresis → SS
- Ocular clonus + agitation/diaphoresis → SS
- Tremor + hyperreflexia → SS
- Hypertonia + temp >38 + clonus → SS
MNEMONIC 04
VORTEX: Vortioxetine Receptor Profile
Exam shortcut: "Vortioxetine = the one with 5 different receptor actions, not just SERT"
The 3 antagonist (5-HT3) is why nausea is less and cognition improves.
The 7 antagonist (5-HT7) is why circadian rhythm and sleep improve.
MNEMONIC 05
CLOZAPINE MONITORING: "Every Week, Every Two, Monthly"
Memory: "1st half year = weekly watch; 2nd half = fortnight; after that = monthly forever"
ANC thresholds, "Green / Amber / Red / STOP"
- ≥1500 = Green (continue)
- 1000–1499 = Amber (more frequent monitoring)
- 500–999 = Red (interrupt + daily)
- <500 = STOP, PERMANENT contraindication
MNEMONIC 06
NMS MANAGEMENT: "STOP, DRIP, DAN-BRO"
Add-on: Lorazepam for agitation/muscle relaxation
ECT for refractory NMS or when malignant catatonia cannot be excluded
Dantrolene dose: 0.25–2 mg/kg IV every 6–12 hours
Bromocriptine dose: 2.5–10 mg TID
MNEMONIC 07
LITHIUM TOXICITY LEVELS: "Fine to Seizing"
Memory hook: "One-Five Fine; Two-Zero Drowsy; Two-Five Dying"
Haemodialysis triggers:
- Level >4.0 mmol/L (any symptoms)
- Level >2.5 mmol/L + severe symptoms
- Anuric renal failure + any toxic level
MNEMONIC 08
CYP2D6 PHENOTYPES: "PURE UM"
PURE UM, the two extremes are the clinical problems
Key CYP2D6 substrates to memorise: "Risky Antidepressants Halt Perfectly"
- Risperidone
- Aripiprazole
- Haloperidol
- Paroxetine, nortriptyline (TCAs)
Paroxetine + fluoxetine = substrate AND inhibitor (phenoconversion from EM to functional PM)
MNEMONIC 09
HLA-B*1502: "Asians Before Carbamazepine"
Memory sentence: "Before Carbamazepine, Check Blood in Asians"
- HLA-B*1502: East/South Asian → SJS/TEN with carbamazepine
- HLA-A*3101: European/Japanese → DRESS + milder reactions
- If positive: use valproate or lamotrigine instead
MNEMONIC 10
ESKETAMINE REMS: "CASH In Hand"
Esketamine schedule: Induction → 2x/week × 4 weeks; Maintenance 1 → weekly × 4 weeks; Maintenance 2 → weekly or every 2 weeks
REMS reason: Abuse potential + dissociation + BP spikes + no safe self-administration
MNEMONIC 11
OREXIN ANTAGONIST COMPARISON: "SLD: Short Long Daytime"
Memory: "Sleeping pills get better with time, Suvorexant, then Lemborexant, then Daridorexant"
Key distinguisher: Daridorexant was the first DORA with daytime functioning as a co-primary endpoint in trials. Use it when next-day performance matters most.
MNEMONIC 12
CARIPRAZINE D3 SELECTIVITY: "D3 = Dopamine for Drive and Desire"
Why cariprazine is unique: 20× selectivity for D3 over D2 → targets negative symptoms
Evidence: RGH-MD-16 trial: cariprazine superior to risperidone on PANSS negative symptoms
Dosing by indication:
- Negative symptoms / schizophrenia: 3–6 mg
- Bipolar depression: 1.5–3 mg (LOWER than schizophrenia)
- Bipolar mania: 3–6 mg
MNEMONIC 13
LUMATEPERONE: "D1 Activator, Not Just Blocker"
Every other antipsychotic = D1 neutral or blocker
Lumateperone = D1 AGONIST in PFC (the key novelty)
Memory: "Luma Turns D1 ON"
Plus: Lumateperone is the only AP approved for Bipolar I AND Bipolar II depression (most only approved for Bipolar I).
Side effect advantage: "LAMP"
- Low EPS
- Anti-metabolic (weight-neutral)
- Minimal prolactin rise
- Preserved cognition (D1 agonism)
MNEMONIC 14
LITHIUM DRUG INTERACTIONS: "NADS Raise Lithium Levels"
Aspirin (low dose): Minimal effect, safe to use
Loop diuretics (frusemide): Less effect than thiazides, still caution
Reverse direction (REDUCE lithium levels): Theophylline, sodium loading, osmotic diuretics
MNEMONIC 15
CLOZAPINE CONTRAINDICATIONS: "BONE MARROW PROBLEMS"
The ONE absolute combination to never do: Clozapine + Carbamazepine
Reason: DOUBLE agranulocytosis risk + carbamazepine induces CYP1A2 → reduces clozapine levels to sub-therapeutic
MNEMONIC 16
PSILOCYBIN CONTRAINDICATIONS: "SPAS"
Plus: Pregnancy, Lithium concurrent use (seizure risk combination)
Memory addition: "SET and SETTING matter, bad set = bad outcome"
Set = psychological preparation
Setting = physical environment + therapist relationship
MNEMONIC 17
BREXANOLONE vs ZURANOLONE: "IV vs PO, Both GABA"
Memory: "Brex needs the DRIP; Zuran takes a TRIP home"
Both: GABA-A PAM (positive allosteric modulator)
Both: approved for PPD
Zuranolone: ALSO approved for MDD (broader indication)
Mechanism unique point: extrasynaptic δ-GABA-A receptors, different from benzodiazepines which act on synaptic γ-GABA-A receptors
MNEMONIC 18
PHARMACOGENOMICS QUICK RECALL: "Poor UltraRapid EATS"
CYP2D6 clinically important phenotypes:
High-yield exam fact: CYP2C19 PMs in Asians → high escitalopram/citalopram levels → QTc risk → dose reduction to 20 mg max
MNEMONIC 19
DISCONTINUATION WASHOUT: "5 WEEKS FOR FLUOX"
Memory: "Fluoxetine takes FIVE, the rest take TWO"
Why 5 weeks for fluoxetine: norfluoxetine active metabolite has ~14-day half-life → fully eliminated at 5 half-lives = ~70 days → practically 5 weeks is the clinical minimum
MNEMONIC 20 (BONUS)
AUVELITY (DXM-BUP): "DXM Needs BUP to Survive"
Without bupropion: DXM metabolised too fast by CYP2D6 → no therapeutic levels
With bupropion: CYP2D6 inhibited → DXM levels ↑8-fold → NMDA antagonism achieved
Memory: "Bupropion saves Dextromethorphan from being eaten by CYP2D6"
Result: Antidepressant effect via:
- NMDA antagonism (ketamine-like pathway)
- NDRI effect (bupropion)
- Sigma-1 agonism (DXM)
First oral NMDA-targeting antidepressant approved (FDA 2022)
QUICK MNEMONIC REFERENCE TABLE
| # | Mnemonic | Topic |
|---|---|---|
| 01 | FINISH | SSRI discontinuation syndrome |
| 02 | FEVER | NMS core features |
| 03 | CLONUS vs RIGIDITY | SS vs NMS differentiator |
| 04 | VORTEX | Vortioxetine receptor profile |
| 05 | Weekly/Fortnightly/Monthly | Clozapine ANC monitoring |
| 06 | STOP DRIP DAN-BRO | NMS management |
| 07 | Fine-Drowsy-Dying levels | Lithium toxicity levels |
| 08 | PURE UM | CYP2D6 phenotypes |
| 09 | Asians Before Carbamazepine | HLA-B*1502 |
| 10 | CASH In Hand | Esketamine REMS |
| 11 | SLD: Short Long Daytime | Orexin antagonist comparison |
| 12 | D3 = Drive Desire Dexterity | Cariprazine D3 selectivity |
| 13 | Luma Turns D1 ON | Lumateperone |
| 14 | NADS | Lithium drug interactions |
| 15 | BONE MARROW | Clozapine contraindications |
| 16 | SPAS | Psilocybin contraindications |
| 17 | DRIP vs TRIP | Brexanolone vs zuranolone |
| 18 | Poor UltraRapid EATS | Pharmacogenomics |
| 19 | 5 WEEKS FOR FLUOX | MAOI washout |
| 20 | DXM Needs BUP | Auvelity mechanism |
High-Yield Comparisons
10 Comparison Tables
TABLE 01
Serotonin Syndrome vs NMS vs Malignant Catatonia vs Malignant Hyperthermia
| Feature | Serotonin Syndrome | Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome | Malignant Catatonia | Malignant Hyperthermia |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Causative agent | Serotonergic drugs (MAOIs, SSRIs, opioids, tramadol) | Dopamine antagonists (antipsychotics, metoclopramide) | Idiopathic; may be triggered by antipsychotics | Volatile anaesthetics (halothane, sevoflurane); succinylcholine |
| Context | Drug initiation, combination, or dose increase | AP initiation, dose increase, or switch | Psychiatric illness (often schizophrenia, mood disorder) | Intraoperative, within minutes of induction |
| Onset | Rapid: within 6 hours | Subacute: 24–72 hours | Subacute to gradual | Extremely rapid: minutes |
| Temperature | Moderate–severe elevation; can reach >41°C | High: >38°C commonly >40°C | High: similar to NMS | Extremely high: >42°C; fastest rise of all four |
| Muscle tone/rigidity | Mild rigidity; clonus is dominant | Lead-pipe rigidity (severe) | Waxy flexibility; posturing; catalepsy | Generalised rigidity, masseter spasm prominent |
| Reflexes | Hyperreflexia (increased) | Normal or decreased | Variable | Normal |
| Clonus | YES, pathognomonic (spontaneous, inducible, ocular) | Absent | Absent | Absent |
| Tremor | Prominent; coarse myoclonus | Less prominent | Variable | May occur |
| Autonomic features | Diaphoresis, tachycardia, hypertension, mydriasis, diarrhoea | Tachycardia, labile BP, diaphoresis, incontinence | Tachycardia, hyperhidrosis | Tachycardia, CO2 rise, metabolic acidosis |
| Consciousness | Agitated and alert early; can deteriorate | Stupor → coma | Mutism, stupor; psychomotor features | Unconscious (under anaesthesia) |
| Mutism/posturing | Rare | Absent | YES, defining features | Absent |
| Serum CK | Usually normal | Very elevated (>1000–50,000 U/L) | Elevated (moderate) | Very elevated |
| Serum iron | Normal | Low (<12 μmol/L), specific marker | Low | Normal |
| Leukocytosis | Absent | Yes (10,000–40,000) | Variable | Absent |
| ECG changes | Tachycardia | Tachycardia, occasional QTc changes | Variable | Tachyarrhythmias |
| Key treatment | Cyproheptadine; benzodiazepines; stop serotonergic drugs | Dantrolene; bromocriptine; stop antipsychotic | ECT (first-line); IV lorazepam | Dantrolene (immediate); cooling; stop triggering agent |
| Cyproheptadine effective | YES | No | No | No |
| Dantrolene effective | Limited | YES | Partial | YES |
| ECT effective | No | Partial (refractory) | YES, first-line | No |
| Mortality untreated | Variable (can be fatal) | 25–30% (historical); 5–10% (current) | High if untreated | >70% if untreated |
| Genetic predisposition | No | No | No | YES, RYR1 gene mutations; autosomal dominant |
TABLE 02
Newer Antidepressant Mechanisms: Side-by-Side
| Feature | Vortioxetine | Vilazodone | Esketamine | Brexanolone | Zuranolone | Auvelity (DXM-BUP) | Gepirone |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Class | SMS (Serotonin modulator and stimulator) | SPARI | NMDA antagonist | Neuroactive steroid | Neuroactive steroid | NMDA antagonist + NDRI | 5-HT1A partial agonist (azapirone) |
| Primary mechanism | SERT inhibition + 5-HT2A/3/7 antagonist + 5-HT1A/1B partial agonist | SERT + 5-HT1A partial agonist | S-enantiomer NMDA open-channel block | GABA-A PAM (synaptic + extrasynaptic δ) | GABA-A PAM (extrasynaptic δ) | DXM: NMDA antagonism; BUP: CYP2D6 inhibitor + NDRI | Selective 5-HT1A partial agonist |
| FDA indication | MDD | MDD | TRD; MDD with acute suicidality (MDSI) | Postpartum depression | MDD; Postpartum depression | MDD | MDD |
| Year approved | 2013 | 2011 | 2019 | 2019 | 2023 | 2022 | 2023 |
| Route | Oral | Oral | Intranasal | IV infusion | Oral | Oral | Oral (XR) |
| Onset of antidepressant effect | 2–4 weeks | 2–4 weeks | Hours–days | 24–48 hours | 3–7 days | 1 week | 2–4 weeks |
| Cognitive benefit | YES (processing speed, executive function) | Minimal | Unclear | Not studied (PPD focus) | Not studied | Not studied | No |
| Sexual dysfunction risk | Very low | Low | Not applicable | Not applicable | Low | Low | Very low |
| Weight gain | Minimal | Minimal | Not applicable | Not applicable | Minimal | Minimal | Minimal |
| REMS required | No | No | YES | YES | No | No | No |
| Discontinuation syndrome | Minimal (long T1/2) | Yes (moderate) | Not applicable | Not applicable | Minimal | Not studied | Minimal |
| Key drug interaction | CYP2D6 inhibitors (reduce dose) | CYP3A4 inhibitors; must take WITH FOOD | CYP3A4 interactions | None significant | CYP3A4 | CYP2D6 (bupropion is the inhibitor here) | CYP3A4 |
| Unique feature | 5-HT3 antagonism → better cognition + GI tolerability | Must be taken with food; SPARI class | Rapid onset; REMS; IV S-ketamine | IV only; first PPD-specific drug | Oral; 14-day course; no REMS | BUP inhibits its own partner DXM's metabolism | No sexual dysfunction; no discontinuation syndrome |
TABLE 03
Long-Acting Injectable Antipsychotics: Comprehensive Comparison
| Feature | Haloperidol Decanoate | Fluphenazine Decanoate | Risperidone Microspheres (Consta) | Paliperidone Palmitate 1-Month | Paliperidone Palmitate 3-Month | Aripiprazole Monohydrate (Maintena) | Aripiprazole Lauroxil (Aristada) | Olanzapine Pamoate (Zypadhera) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Frequency | Every 4 weeks | Every 2–6 weeks | Every 2 weeks | Monthly | Every 3 months | Monthly | 4–8 weeks (dose-dependent) | Every 2–4 weeks |
| Vehicle | Sesame oil | Sesame oil | Biodegradable microspheres | Aqueous nanocrystal suspension | Aqueous nanocrystal suspension | Aqueous suspension | Aqueous suspension | Aqueous suspension |
| Loading dose needed | Yes (oral overlap 4 weeks) | Yes (oral overlap) | No (2-week lag, oral overlap required for 3 weeks) | Yes (Day 1 + Day 8 deltoid) | No (after 4+ months on PP1M) | No (oral aripiprazole 14 days) | NCD: Initio 675mg + oral 30mg same day | No |
| Injection sites | Gluteal | Gluteal | Deltoid or gluteal | Deltoid only for first 2 doses; then deltoid or gluteal | Deltoid or gluteal | Deltoid or gluteal | Deltoid or gluteal | Gluteal (slow, Z-track) |
| Generation | First (typical) | First (typical) | Second (atypical) | Second (atypical) | Second (atypical) | Third (atypical, partial agonist) | Third (atypical, partial agonist) | Second (atypical) |
| EPS risk | High | High | Moderate | Moderate | Moderate | Low (akathisia risk) | Low (akathisia risk) | Low |
| Weight gain | Moderate | Moderate | Moderate | Moderate | Moderate | Low–moderate | Low–moderate | High |
| Prolactin elevation | High | High | High | High | High | Minimal (partial agonist) | Minimal | Moderate |
| QTc risk | Moderate | Moderate | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low |
| Post-injection monitoring | None required | None required | None required | None required | None required | None required | None required | 3 hours (PDSS risk) |
| PDSS risk | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | YES, post-injection delirium/sedation syndrome |
| Available in India | Yes (widely) | Yes | Limited | Limited (Sustenna) | Rare/unavailable | Limited | Not available | Not available |
| Key distinguishing feature | Oldest, most data | Shortest of older depots | Requires 3-week oral overlap | First aqueous AP depot; deltoid-first protocol | 3-monthly; requires 4 months PP1M first | Partial agonist properties preserved | NCD initiation protocol; multiple interval options | Monitoring requirement due to PDSS |
TABLE 04
Orexin Receptor Antagonists (DORAs): Full Comparison
| Feature | Suvorexant (Belsomra) | Lemborexant (Dayvigo) | Daridorexant (Quviviq) |
|---|---|---|---|
| FDA approval year | 2014 | 2019 | 2022 |
| Doses | 5, 10, 15, 20 mg | 5, 10 mg | 25, 50 mg |
| Recommended dose | 10–20 mg | 5–10 mg | 25–50 mg |
| Half-life | ~12 hours | ~17–27 hours | ~8 hours |
| Schedule | IV (controlled) | IV (controlled) | IV (controlled) |
| OX1R affinity | High | High | Moderate |
| OX2R affinity | High | Higher selectivity | Moderate |
| Mechanism selectivity | Dual OX1R + OX2R | Dual; higher OX2R bias | Dual OX1R + OX2R |
| Key clinical trials | SUNRISE-1, SUNRISE-2 | SUNRISE-1, SUNRISE-2; vs zolpidem | ESADA-1, ESADA-2 (daytime functioning co-primary) |
| vs Zolpidem evidence | Not directly compared in pivotal trials | Lemborexant 5 mg better than zolpidem ER 6.25 mg on subjective sleep at 1 month | Not directly compared |
| Sleep onset benefit | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Sleep maintenance benefit | Yes | Yes (strong) | Yes |
| Next-day impairment | Moderate concern | Greater concern (long T1/2) | Least concern |
| Daytime functioning endpoint | Not primary | Not primary | Co-primary endpoint, validated in trials |
| CYP3A4 interaction | Significant, reduce to 5 mg with strong inhibitors | Significant | Less clinically significant at approved doses |
| Use in elderly | Approved; caution | Preferred (sleep maintenance data in elderly; SUNRISE-2) | Approved; best next-day profile |
| Rebound insomnia | Minimal | Minimal | Minimal |
| Tolerance development | Minimal (vs BZDs) | Minimal | Minimal |
| Complex sleep behaviour BBW | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Best suited for | General insomnia; onset + maintenance | Elderly; sleep maintenance prominent | When patient's daytime performance is critical |
TABLE 05
CYP450 Drug Interaction Matrix: Psychiatry High-Yield
| Drug | CYP1A2 | CYP2D6 | CYP2C19 | CYP3A4 | Net Clinical Concern |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fluvoxamine | Strong inhibitor | Moderate inhibitor | Strong inhibitor | Moderate inhibitor | Raises clozapine levels dramatically (CYP1A2); raises diazepam, TCA levels |
| Fluoxetine | Weak | Strong inhibitor | Moderate inhibitor | Moderate inhibitor | Raises risperidone, aripiprazole, TCA levels; phenoconversion of EMs to functional PMs |
| Paroxetine | Weak | Strong inhibitor | Moderate inhibitor | Weak | Same as fluoxetine for CYP2D6; clinically most potent 2D6 inhibitor of SSRIs |
| Carbamazepine | Inducer | Inducer | Inducer | Strong inducer | Reduces levels of: clozapine, haloperidol, olanzapine, quetiapine, lamotrigine, valproate, TCAs |
| Valproate | Inhibitor (modest) | Raises lamotrigine levels 2× (UGT inhibition, not CYP); raises clozapine slightly; reduces phenytoin | |||
| Rifampicin | Strong inducer | Inducer | Inducer | Strong inducer | Dramatically reduces levels of virtually all psychiatric drugs |
| Smoking (cigarettes) | Strong inducer | Reduces clozapine and olanzapine levels significantly; stopping smoking = toxicity risk | |||
| Ketoconazole | Strong inhibitor | Raises quetiapine, buspirone, haloperidol levels | |||
| Bupropion | Weak | Strong inhibitor | Raises TCA levels; the therapeutic basis of Auvelity (DXM-BUP) | ||
| Clozapine | Substrate | Substrate | Substrate | Substrate | Victim of multiple interactions; CYP1A2 induction by smoking most clinically significant |
| Olanzapine | Substrate | Minor substrate | Minor | CYP1A2 induction (smoking) reduces levels 40–50% | |
| Haloperidol | Substrate | Substrate + weak inhibitor | Substrate | CYP2D6 PMs get higher haloperidol levels → EPS risk | |
| Quetiapine | Substrate | Levels rise with CYP3A4 inhibitors (ketoconazole); fall with inducers (carbamazepine) | |||
| Aripiprazole | Substrate | Substrate | CYP2D6 PMs get higher levels; reduce aripiprazole dose by 50% with strong 2D6 inhibitors |
Key rule: Substrates are victims; inhibitors/inducers are perpetrators. Most psychiatric drugs are substrates, they are affected by co-prescribed inhibitors/inducers.
TABLE 06
Ketamine vs Esketamine: Clinical Comparison
| Feature | Racemic Ketamine (IV) | Esketamine Intranasal (Spravato) |
|---|---|---|
| Composition | 50:50 mixture of R- and S-enantiomers | S-enantiomer only |
| Route | IV infusion (most common); IM; oral (compounded) | Intranasal |
| FDA approval | NOT approved for depression (off-label) | Approved: TRD (2019); MDSI (2020) |
| REMS | No | Yes, REMS programme required |
| Setting | Ketamine infusion clinics; anaesthesia settings | Certified healthcare settings only |
| NMDA receptor potency | R-ketamine: moderate; S-ketamine: higher | Higher (3–4× more potent than R-ketamine at NMDA) |
| Bioavailability | ~100% (IV) | ~48% intranasal |
| Dose | 0.5 mg/kg over 40 min (typical) | 56 mg or 84 mg per session |
| Dose standardisation | Variable across clinics | Standardised |
| Induction protocol | Typically 6 infusions over 2–3 weeks | 2×/week × 4 weeks |
| Dissociation | Yes, common | Yes, very common (>50%) |
| Duration of effect | Days to 2 weeks per infusion series | Days to weeks per session |
| Regulatory oversight | Limited; no registry | REMS certification + monitoring |
| Evidence base | Extensive (meta-analyses, multiple RCTs, decades of data) | Phase III RCTs available (TRANSFORM series) |
| Cost | ~$400–800 per infusion (often not insured) | ~$800–900 per session (insurance coverage varies) |
| Insurance coverage | Rarely covered | Better coverage in US (FDA-approved) |
| Concomitant antidepressant | Not standardised | Yes, must be combined with oral AD |
| Antidepressant without concurrent AD? | Sometimes used alone | No, esketamine is adjunctive |
| Abuse/diversion risk | Higher (Schedule III; IV access) | Lower (REMS controls dispensing) |
| Monitoring post-dose | Clinic-dependent (usually 1–2h) | Mandatory 2 hours |
| Key advantage | Flexibility; longer evidence base; lower cost | FDA approval; standardised; REMS accountability; intranasal route |
| Key disadvantage | No regulatory approval; variable protocols | REMS burden; cost; short duration effect |
TABLE 07
Newer Antipsychotics: Mechanism and Side Effect Profile
| Drug | Key Receptor Profile | EPS Risk | Weight Gain | Metabolic Risk | Prolactin | QTc | Sedation | Unique Feature |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lumateperone | D1 agonist + D2 pre-agonist/post-antagonist + 5-HT2A + SERT | Very low | Minimal | Minimal | Minimal | Low | Low | D1 agonism; approved bipolar I + II depression |
| Pimavanserin | 5-HT2A inverse agonist; NO D2 binding | None | Minimal | Minimal | None | Moderate | Low | Only for Parkinson's psychosis; no D2 binding |
| Cariprazine | D2/D3 partial agonist; D3 high affinity | Moderate (akathisia) | Moderate | Moderate | Low | Low | Low | D3 selectivity; best negative symptom evidence |
| Brexpiprazole | D2 partial agonist (low intrinsic) + 5-HT1A + 5-HT2A antagonist | Low | Moderate | Moderate | Low | Low | Low | Approved: schizophrenia + MDD augment + AD agitation |
| Aripiprazole | D2/D3 partial agonist + 5-HT1A partial agonist | Low | Low | Low | Very low | Low | Low | Partial agonist; akathisia at higher doses |
| Quetiapine | H1 >> 5-HT2A > D2; M1 at low doses | Very low | High | High | Very low | Low–moderate | High | Sedation used therapeutically; off-label for anxiety/insomnia |
| Olanzapine | H1 > M1 > 5-HT2A > D2 | Low | Very high | Very high | Moderate | Low | High | Most effective typical-range AP; worst metabolic profile |
| Clozapine | D4 > 5-HT2A > H1 > M > α | None | Very high | Very high | Very low | Moderate | Very high | Gold standard for TRS; agranulocytosis risk; seizures |
| Risperidone | D2 + 5-HT2A | Moderate–high | Moderate | Moderate | Very high | Low | Low | Highest prolactin of all SGAs; galactorrhoea, amenorrhoea |
| Amisulpride | D2/D3 selective antagonist | Moderate | Minimal | Minimal | High | High | Minimal | Selective D2/D3; highest QTc risk among SGAs |
TABLE 08
Lithium Monitoring: Baseline, Ongoing, Specific Situations
| Parameter | Baseline | Ongoing (stable) | Pregnancy | Toxicity workup |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Serum lithium | Every 3–6 months (12h post-dose) | Every 2 weeks in 3rd trimester | Immediately | |
| Renal function (eGFR, Cr, BUN) | Yes | Every 6–12 months | Monthly | Yes |
| Thyroid (TSH, FT4) | Yes | Annually | Quarterly | Only if symptomatic |
| Serum calcium | Yes | Annually | Quarterly | If symptomatic |
| ECG | Yes (>50 years or cardiac history) | As clinically indicated | Yes | If QTc concern |
| Pregnancy test | Yes (reproductive-age women) | As appropriate | ||
| Urinalysis + urine osmolality | Yes (baseline renal tubular function) | If polyuria develops | Yes | Yes (myoglobinuria check) |
| FBC | Not routine | Not routine | Not routine | If infection |
| Weight / BMI | Yes | Every 3 months | Monthly | |
| Target level | 0.6–0.8 mmol/L (maintenance) | 0.6–0.8 mmol/L (same) | If >1.5: toxicity management |
Special monitoring situations:
- Patient starting NSAID: recheck level in 3–5 days
- Patient febrile/vomiting: advise holding lithium + recheck level on recovery
- Surgery: discuss with surgeon; hold morning dose; restart when eating/drinking
- Stopping smoking: recheck clozapine level (not lithium, this is for CYP1A2)
TABLE 09
Antidepressant Augmentation: Evidence and Practical Guide
| Augmentation Strategy | Evidence Level | FDA Status | Time to Effect | Dose | Key Adverse Effects | Best for |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aripiprazole + AD | Level I | FDA approved (adjunctive MDD) | 2–4 weeks | 2–15 mg/day | Akathisia, weight gain | Good tolerability; low metabolic risk |
| Quetiapine XR + AD | Level I | FDA approved (adjunctive MDD) | 1–2 weeks | 50–300 mg/day | Sedation, weight gain, metabolic | Insomnia comorbid; rapid anxiolysis |
| Brexpiprazole + AD | Level I | FDA approved (adjunctive MDD) | 2–4 weeks | 1–3 mg/day | Low akathisia; weight gain | When aripiprazole not tolerated |
| Lithium + AD | Level I | Off-label (not FDA for this) | 2–4 weeks | 0.5–0.8 mmol/L | Tremor, polyuria, hypothyroidism | Bipolar spectrum; classic evidence |
| T3 (liothyronine) + AD | Level II | Off-label | 2–4 weeks | 25–50 mcg/day | Tachycardia, anxiety, osteoporosis | TCA augmentation; thyroid function normal |
| Mirtazapine + SSRI/SNRI | Level II | Off-label | 2–4 weeks | 15–45 mg/day | Sedation, weight gain | Insomnia; appetite loss |
| Buspirone + SSRI | Level II | Off-label | 4–6 weeks | 20–60 mg/day | Dizziness, nausea | Anxiety-predominant MDD |
| Esketamine + oral AD | Level I | FDA approved (TRD) | Hours–days | 56–84 mg per session | Dissociation, sedation, BP rise | TRD with urgent response needed |
| Pramipexole + AD | Level II | Off-label | 3–4 weeks | 0.5–2 mg/day | Nausea, hypotension, impulse control | Anhedonia; bipolar II depression |
| Lamotrigine + AD | Level II | Off-label | 6–8 weeks | 50–200 mg/day | Rash (must titrate slowly) | Bipolar spectrum features; TRD |
| Olanzapine + fluoxetine (OFC) | Level I | FDA approved (bipolar depression) | 1–2 weeks | 6/25–12/50 mg | Weight gain, sedation, metabolic | Bipolar depression; TRD with psychotic features |
TABLE 10
High-Risk Drug Combinations: Summary Reference
| Combination | Mechanism | Risk Level | Clinical Consequence | Management |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MAOI + SSRI | Excess serotonin | FATAL | Severe serotonin syndrome; potentially lethal | Absolute contraindication; strict washout (5 weeks fluoxetine → MAOI) |
| MAOI + tramadol | Excess serotonin (tramadol = weak SERT inhibitor + opioid) | FATAL | Serotonin syndrome | Contraindicated |
| MAOI + meperidine (pethidine) | Excess serotonin + NE | FATAL | Hyperpyrexic crisis, serotonin syndrome | Contraindicated; use morphine instead for pain |
| Clozapine + carbamazepine | Additive agranulocytosis + CYP1A2 induction | Absolute contraindication | Agranulocytosis + sub-therapeutic clozapine levels | NEVER combine; use valproate instead |
| Clozapine + IM benzodiazepine | Additive CNS + respiratory depression | High | Respiratory collapse; death reported | Avoid IM BZD within hours of clozapine; oral BZD with caution |
| Lithium + NSAIDs | NSAIDs reduce renal Li clearance | High | Lithium toxicity (50–100% level rise) | Avoid; if necessary reduce Li dose 25%, monitor in 3–5 days |
| Lithium + ACE inhibitors | Reduced GFR → Li retention | High | Lithium toxicity | Avoid; if necessary reduce dose + monitor |
| Lithium + thiazide diuretics | Na depletion → Li retention (competitive) | High | Lithium toxicity | Use loop diuretic instead (less risk); monitor levels |
| Haloperidol + pimozide | Additive QTc prolongation | High | Torsades de pointes | Avoid combination; ECG monitoring if necessary |
| Fluvoxamine + clozapine | Fluvoxamine inhibits CYP1A2 → clozapine ↑2–10× | High (unintentional) | Clozapine toxicity (sedation, seizures) | Avoid inadvertent prescription; intentional use requires dose reduction and level monitoring |
| Valproate + lamotrigine | Valproate inhibits UGT (glucuronidation) → lamotrigine ↑2× | Moderate (manageable) | Lamotrigine toxicity (rash, dizziness), also additive anti-epileptic benefit | Halve lamotrigine dose when adding valproate; slow titration |
| SSRIs + warfarin | SSRIs inhibit platelet 5-HT uptake + may inhibit CYP2C9 | Moderate | Increased bleeding risk; raised INR | Monitor INR; consider gastroprotection |
| Carbamazepine + oral contraceptives | CYP3A4 induction → OCP levels fall | Moderate | Contraceptive failure | Use higher-dose OCP or barrier method |
| Smoking + clozapine/olanzapine | Smoking induces CYP1A2 → drug levels fall | Moderate–high | Subtherapeutic levels → relapse | Monitor levels with changes in smoking; adjust dose when smoking changes |
PYQ Frequency Analysis
Previous Year Question Analysis
SECTION A: HIGH-FREQUENCY TOPIC MAP
The following topics have appeared repeatedly across Indian PG psychiatry exit examinations (PG exams, Exam pattern). Frequency ratings are based on pattern analysis across 17+ years of available question data.
| Topic | Estimated Frequency | Typical Marks | Exam Format |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clozapine, indications, monitoring, adverse effects | ★★★★★ Very High | 10–15 marks | Long essay or short note |
| Serotonin syndrome vs NMS | ★★★★★ Very High | 10 marks | Compare/contrast or short note |
| Lithium, pharmacology, toxicity, monitoring | ★★★★★ Very High | 10–15 marks | Long essay |
| Drug interactions in psychiatry | ★★★★☆ High | 8–10 marks | Short note or part of long essay |
| Treatment-resistant depression, augmentation | ★★★★☆ High | 8–10 marks | Short note |
| Long-acting injectable antipsychotics | ★★★★☆ High | 8–10 marks | Short note |
| Newer antidepressants (general) | ★★★☆☆ Moderate | 5–8 marks | Short note |
| Esketamine / ketamine in depression | ★★★☆☆ Moderate | 5–8 marks | Short note |
| NMS, management | ★★★★☆ High | 8–10 marks | Short note or part of diff dx |
| Benzodiazepine withdrawal | ★★★☆☆ Moderate | 5–8 marks | Short note |
| Pharmacogenomics in psychiatry | ★★★☆☆ Moderate | 5–8 marks | Short note |
| Antipsychotic switching | ★★★☆☆ Moderate | 5–8 marks | Short note |
| Polypharmacy and deprescribing | ★★☆☆☆ Emerging | 5 marks | Short note |
| Psychedelics in psychiatry | ★★☆☆☆ Emerging | 5 marks | Short note |
| Brexanolone / postpartum depression | ★★☆☆☆ Emerging | 5 marks | Short note |
| Orexin antagonists (insomnia) | ★★☆☆☆ Emerging | 5 marks | Short note |
SECTION B: RECONSTRUCTED PYQ BANK
Category 1: Long Essays (15 marks): Most Likely Patterns
Q1.1
Discuss the pharmacology, indications, adverse effects, and monitoring of clozapine. How would you manage a patient who develops agranulocytosis while on clozapine?
Ra's Answer Blueprint: - Pharmacology: receptor profile (D4, D2 fast-off, 5-HT2A, H1, M), pharmacokinetics (CYP1A2), no protein binding - Indications: TRS (TRRIP criteria), suicidality, PD psychosis, refractory bipolar - Adverse effects: haematological (agranulocytosis), cardiovascular (myocarditis), metabolic (weight, DM), neurological (seizures, sedation), autonomic (sialorrhea, constipation) - Monitoring: ANC protocol (weekly × 26 weeks → fortnightly → monthly), cardiac monitoring - Agranulocytosis management: stop clozapine, admit, reverse barrier nursing, G-CSF, haematology consult, permanent registration Tip: This question has appeared in some form every 2–3 years. Always include the ANC threshold table and the re-challenge contraindication.
Q1.2
What is treatment-resistant depression? Discuss the various pharmacological augmentation strategies with evidence for each. Which strategy has the strongest evidence base?
Ra's Answer Blueprint: - Define TRD (2+ adequate trials of different class ADs at adequate dose × adequate duration) - Augmentation vs switching distinction - Tier 1: AP augmentation (aripiprazole, quetiapine, brexpiprazole, FDA approved) + lithium augmentation (Level I, NNT ~5) - Tier 2: T3 augmentation, mirtazapine + SSRI, buspirone - Tier 3: Esketamine (rapid onset, REMS), lamotrigine, pramipexole - Strongest evidence: lithium (decades of RCTs) and AP augmentation (multiple Phase III RCTs, FDA approved) Tip: Always include a structured table of evidence levels. Examiners reward systematic organisation.
Q1.3
Describe the pharmacology, therapeutic drug monitoring, long-term effects, and use in pregnancy of lithium. How would you manage lithium toxicity?
Ra's Answer Blueprint: - Mechanisms: inositol depletion, GSK-3β inhibition, serotonin potentiation, BDNF - PK: complete absorption, no protein binding, no hepatic metabolism, renal excretion competes with Na+ - TDM: 12h post-dose; target levels by indication; monitoring frequency - Long-term: NDI (polyuria), hypothyroidism, chronic kidney disease, hyperparathyroidism - Pregnancy: revised Ebstein anomaly risk (0.6/1000 → 2.1/1000), peripartum management, breastfeeding - Toxicity: precipitants (NSAIDs, ACEi, thiazides, dehydration), features by level, management (IV NS, haemodialysis criteria) Tip: The pregnancy section is frequently asked as a standalone short note. Know the NEJM 2017 revised figures.
Category 2: Short Notes (8–10 marks): High-Frequency
Q2.1
Write a short note on serotonin syndrome. How does it differ from NMS?
Key points required: - Pathophysiology (5-HT1A and 5-HT2A excess) - Clinical triad: cognitive + autonomic + neuromuscular - Hunter criteria (5 diagnostic patterns, all involve clonus or hyperreflexia) - Causative drugs (MAOIs, SSRIs, tramadol, linezolid, DXM) - Management: stop drug, cyproheptadine, benzodiazepines, cooling - SS vs NMS table: clonus vs rigidity; hyperreflexia vs normal reflexes; CK normal vs very elevated; onset rapid vs slow Most commonly lost marks: Forgetting to state Hunter criteria specifically; confusing SS rigidity with NMS lead-pipe rigidity.
Q2.2
Discuss the pharmacology and clinical uses of newer antipsychotics, cariprazine, lumateperone, and brexpiprazole.
Key points required: - Cariprazine: D3 high-affinity partial agonism; D3 selectivity clinical significance; evidence for negative symptoms; bipolar depression at low doses; long active metabolite half-life - Lumateperone: D1 agonism (novel); dual D2 activity; SERT inhibition; approved bipolar I + II depression; weight-neutral - Brexpiprazole: SDAM; low intrinsic D2 activity; approved for AD agitation (2023, first drug); MDD augmentation; schizophrenia Tip: Examiners expect you to distinguish these from earlier SGAs mechanistically, not just list them. The D3 selectivity of cariprazine and the D1 agonism of lumateperone are the examinable novelties.
Q2.3
Write a note on pharmacogenomics in psychiatry. What is the significance of CYP2D6 polymorphisms?
Key points required: - Definition and rationale for pharmacogenomics - CYP2D6 phenotypes: PM, IM, EM, UM; frequencies by ethnicity - Clinical substrates: TCAs, risperidone, aripiprazole, haloperidol - PM risk: toxicity at standard doses; UM risk: treatment failure - Phenoconversion: paroxetine/fluoxetine as inhibitors → functional PM - CYP2C19: Asians 15–20% PM; citalopram/escitalopram QTc risk - HLA-B*1502: carbamazepine + Asian ancestry + SJS/TEN; mandatory testing; FDA label - Limitations of clinical pharmacogenomic testing (PRIME Care trial negative)
Q2.4
Discuss the management of NMS. How does it differ from malignant catatonia?
Key points required: - NMS: stop antipsychotic, IV fluids, cooling, dantrolene, bromocriptine, ICU - Re-challenge protocol: 2-week wait, low-potency atypical, slow titration, informed consent - Malignant catatonia vs NMS: MC features (mutism, posturing, waxy flexibility); MC treatment is ECT (not dantrolene); NMS has no posturing; differentiation important because antipsychotics worsen MC but are causative in NMS - Differential: also include SS (clonus, onset rapid, cyproheptadine) and malignant hyperthermia (intraoperative, RYR1 mutation, dantrolene)
Q2.5
Write a short note on long-acting injectable antipsychotics. What are their advantages and disadvantages?
Key points required: - Rationale: non-adherence as #1 cause of relapse; 50–70% non-adherent within 1 year - Types: first-generation depots (oil-based) vs second-generation (aqueous nanocrystals, microspheres) - Key examples: paliperidone palmitate (monthly, 3-monthly, 6-monthly); aripiprazole lauroxil (NCD initiation); olanzapine pamoate (PDSS monitoring) - Advantages: eliminates covert non-adherence; stable levels; early warning signal; reduced relapse - Disadvantages: PDSS (olanzapine pamoate); cannot rapidly stop; pain; need for clinic attendance; cost - PP3M specific: prerequisites (4+ months PP1M at stable dose); dose calculation (3.5× PP1M dose)
Q2.6
Discuss esketamine nasal spray, mechanism of action, indications, REMS requirements, and place in therapy.
Key points required: - S-enantiomer of ketamine; NMDA antagonist - Mechanism pathway: NMDA block → AMPA disinhibition → BDNF → mTOR → synaptogenesis - Indications: TRD (2019); MDD with acute suicidal ideation (2020) - REMS: certified settings only; 2-hour post-dose monitoring; no driving on dosing day; BP + dissociation monitoring - Protocol: induction 2×/week × 4 weeks; maintenance - Comparison with IV ketamine: FDA-approved vs off-label; standardised vs variable; intranasal vs IV - Limitations: REMS burden; short duration of effect; cost; not monotherapy
Q2.7
Write a short note on benzodiazepine withdrawal syndrome, pathophysiology, clinical features, and management.
Key points required: - Pathophysiology: GABA-A receptor downregulation + NMDA upregulation → CNS excitability rebound - Features: mild (anxiety, insomnia, tremor) → moderate (tachycardia, perceptual disturbances) → severe (seizures, delirium) - Life-threatening potential (unlike most drug withdrawals) - Timeline by half-life (short-acting onset 12–24h; long-acting 3–4 days) - Management: substitution with diazepam; Ashton Protocol (10% taper every 1–2 weeks); adjuncts (carbamazepine, valproate, propranolol) - Protracted withdrawal syndrome: months of residual anxiety and cognitive fog
Q2.8
Discuss drug interactions in psychiatry. Which combinations are potentially fatal?
Key points required: - Classification: pharmacokinetic (CYP450 enzyme inhibition/induction, P-gp) vs pharmacodynamic (additive/synergistic/antagonistic) - Fatal combinations: MAOI + SSRI (SS); MAOI + tramadol/meperidine; clozapine + carbamazepine (absolute contraindication) - High-risk: lithium + NSAIDs; clozapine + IM benzodiazepine; haloperidol + QTc-prolonging drugs - CYP1A2 and smoking: clozapine and olanzapine levels reduced by 40–50%; stopping smoking = toxicity risk - Fluvoxamine + clozapine: raises clozapine 2–10× (clinical use in augmentation but requires dose reduction) - Carbamazepine + most psychotropics: potent CYP3A4/1A2 inducer
Category 3: Short Notes (5 marks): Lower Frequency but Emerging
Q3.1
Write a brief note on psilocybin-assisted therapy.
Key points required: - 5-HT2A agonism → DMN disruption → neuroplasticity (BDNF, mTOR, synaptogenesis) - Evidence: TRD (COMPASS Phase 2b, 29% remission with 25 mg); MDD (Johns Hopkins, 71% response); cancer existential distress; alcohol use disorder - Model: not standalone drug, psilocybin-assisted psychotherapy (preparation + drug session + integration) - Contraindications: personal/family history of schizophrenia, bipolar I, active psychosis - Regulatory: Schedule I (India, USA); Australia rescheduled 2023; FDA Breakthrough Therapy Designation - Not currently available for clinical use in India
Q3.2
Write a note on brexanolone for postpartum depression.
Key points required: - Mechanism: synthetic allopregnanolone; GABA-A PAM (synaptic γ-subunit AND extrasynaptic δ-subunit) - Peripartum hypothesis: progesterone → allopregnanolone rise in pregnancy; abrupt fall postpartum → PPD in vulnerable women - Administration: IV 60-hour infusion; hospital setting; REMS required - Evidence: HUMMINGBIRD trial, 73.7% response at 60 hours - Contrast with zuranolone: oral; 14 days; no REMS; approved for MDD + PPD; same mechanism - Comparison with SSRIs: faster onset (hours vs weeks); PPD-specific mechanism; IV vs oral
Q3.3
Write a note on orexin antagonists in the management of insomnia.
Key points required: - Orexin system: wake-promoting neuropeptides; lateral hypothalamus; project to LC, raphe, TMN, VTA - DORA mechanism: block OX1R + OX2R → specifically suppress wake drive - Advantage over BZDs/Z-drugs: preserves sleep architecture; no physical dependence; minimal rebound insomnia - Three agents: suvorexant (2014, ~12h T1/2), lemborexant (2019, ~17–27h, preferred elderly), daridorexant (2022, ~8h, best daytime functioning) - Side effects: somnolence, complex sleep behaviours (BBW), next-day impairment - Schedule IV; no significant tolerance
Q3.4
Write a note on rational polypharmacy in psychiatry.
Key points required: - Definition: concurrent use of multiple drugs with explicit clinical rationale and evidence base - Evidence-based combinations: SSRI + AP augmentation (FDA-approved), lithium + AD, OFC (olanzapine + fluoxetine), clozapine + lamotrigine - Irrational polypharmacy: two APs without rationale, prescribing cascade, two drugs same class, anticholinergics no longer needed - Deprescribing principles: reconcile → identify targets → assess feasibility → patient engagement → monitor - STOPP/START criteria framework - High-priority deprescribing targets: anticholinergics, long-term BZDs, antipsychotics in dementia when stabilised
SECTION C: EXAMINER FOCUS AREAS BY YEAR PATTERN
What Examiners Test More in Each Sub-topic
Clozapine questions, examiner preferences:
- Almost always include: monitoring protocol (exact ANC thresholds and frequencies)
- Frequently asked: management of agranulocytosis (G-CSF now standard, mention it)
- Occasionally asked: re-challenge protocol; clozapine in suicidality; clozapine vs other APs in TRS
- Rarely asked: pharmacogenomics of clozapine (CYP1A2, smoking interaction)
Serotonin syndrome, examiner preferences:
- Hunter criteria are more likely to be asked than Sternbach criteria (Hunter has better sensitivity/specificity)
- Comparison with NMS is asked almost every time SS appears
- Management: cyproheptadine dose (12 mg loading, 2 mg q2h) is a specific detail that scores marks
- The MAOI washout periods (5 weeks for fluoxetine, 2 weeks for others) appear regularly
Lithium, examiner preferences:
- Pregnancy section almost always included (Ebstein anomaly risk, use updated 2017 NEJM figures)
- Renal effects (NDI, CKD) are frequently asked in the adverse effects section
- Drug interactions (NSAIDs, ACEi, thiazides) always expected
- Haemodialysis indications are specific and examinable
Newer drugs, examiner preferences:
- Mechanism of action questions dominate: "Explain the multimodal mechanism of vortioxetine"
- Esketamine REMS is a high-yield specific topic (few candidates know the monitoring requirements)
- Cariprazine D3 selectivity and clinical significance is a favourite newer topic
- Psilocybin has started appearing as a 5-mark short note since 2022–2023
SECTION D: PREDICTED HIGH-PROBABILITY QUESTIONS FOR 2026
Based on topic frequency trends and emerging areas:
Tier 1: Almost Certain (>80% probability)
- Clozapine: monitoring, adverse effects, management of agranulocytosis (long essay or 10-mark short note)
- Serotonin syndrome vs NMS: pathophysiology, clinical features, management, differentiation (10 marks)
- Lithium: comprehensive pharmacology, TDM, toxicity management (long essay or 10 marks)
- TRD augmentation strategies (10 marks)
Tier 2: Very Likely (60–80% probability)
- Drug interactions in psychiatry, high-risk combinations (8–10 marks)
- LAI antipsychotics, advantages, types, monitoring (8 marks)
- Newer antipsychotics, cariprazine, lumateperone, brexpiprazole (8 marks)
- Esketamine, mechanism, REMS, place in therapy (8 marks)
- Benzodiazepine withdrawal, management (5–8 marks)
- Antipsychotic discontinuation and supersensitivity psychosis (5 marks)
Tier 3: Likely (40–60% probability)
- Psilocybin-assisted therapy (5 marks)
- Brexanolone / postpartum depression pharmacology (5 marks)
- Orexin antagonists for insomnia (5 marks)
- Pharmacogenomics: CYP2D6, CYP2C19, HLA-B1502 (5–8 marks)*
- Rational polypharmacy and deprescribing (5 marks)
Tier 4: Watch List (Emerging, 20–40% probability)
- MDMA-assisted therapy for PTSD (5 marks)
- Auvelity (dextromethorphan-bupropion) mechanism (5 marks)
- Zuranolone for MDD/PPD (5 marks)
- Precision psychiatry and biomarker-guided treatment (5 marks)
- Cannabis-based medicines in psychiatry (5 marks)
SECTION E: MARK ALLOCATION STRATEGY
For a 15-mark long essay:
For a 10-mark short note:
For a 5-mark short note:
SECTION F: COMMON EXAM MISTAKES: AVOID THESE
SECTION G: INTEGRATIVE QUESTION FORMATS
These are multi-part questions that test integration across topics. Increasingly common in PG exams-pattern papers.
Integrative Q1:
A 35-year-old male with treatment-resistant schizophrenia is started on clozapine 300 mg/day. Six weeks later he develops fever, chest pain, and elevated troponin. His ANC is 2,800/mm³.
(a) What is the most likely diagnosis? (2 marks)
(b) What is your immediate management? (4 marks)
(c) Can this patient be re-challenged with clozapine in future? Discuss. (4 marks)
Answer framework: (a) Clozapine-induced myocarditis (fever + chest pain + elevated troponin + time frame, weeks 2–8) (b) Stop clozapine immediately; ECG; echocardiogram; cardiac biomarkers (serial troponin, CRP); cardiologist consult; cardiology monitoring; supportive care; do NOT restart clozapine (c) Controversial, not a contraindication unlike agranulocytosis, but high risk. In specialised centres only: cardiac clearance, very slow titration (6.25 mg every 1–2 weeks), daily cardiac monitoring first 8 weeks, low-dose aspirin, baseline echo. Benefit-risk discussion essential. Most guidelines advise against.
Integrative Q2:
A 28-year-old woman with bipolar II disorder is stable on lithium 800 mg/day (level 0.7 mmol/L). She plans to get pregnant.
(a) What are the teratogenic risks of lithium? (3 marks)
(b) How would you manage her medication during pregnancy and post-partum? (4 marks)
(c) What monitoring is required if lithium is continued? (3 marks)
Answer framework: (a) Ebstein anomaly (tricuspid valve malformation): background risk 6/10,000; with lithium 21/10,000 (NEJM 2017 revised figures, much lower than previously stated). Other neonatal effects if continued: floppy baby syndrome, transient hypotonia, cyanosis. (b) First trimester: discuss stopping vs continuing based on bipolar severity. If continued: maintain at lowest effective dose. 36 weeks: reduce dose 25–50% (GFR peaks then falls post-partum → level spikes). Post-partum: retitrate as GFR normalises. Breastfeeding: generally advised against (40–50% of maternal level in breast milk). (c) Foetal echocardiogram at 16–18 weeks; serum lithium levels fortnightly in 3rd trimester; neonatal examination for lithium effects; renal function monitoring; anomaly scan; growth scans.
Integrative Q3:
A 45-year-old man with schizophrenia on haloperidol 20 mg/day develops fever (40.2°C), generalised rigidity, altered consciousness, and CK of 18,000 U/L. Simultaneously, his SSRI was increased two weeks ago.
(a) What are the two most important differential diagnoses? (2 marks)
(b) How would you differentiate them clinically and on investigations? (4 marks)
(c) Outline management for each. (4 marks)
Answer framework: (a) NMS (haloperidol exposure, rigidity, elevated CK) vs Serotonin syndrome (SSRI increase, though CK usually lower in SS) (b) NMS: lead-pipe rigidity, normal/reduced reflexes, no clonus, CK very elevated, low serum iron, onset over days, leukocytosis. SS: clonus (spontaneous/inducible/ocular), hyperreflexia, onset rapid (hours), CK usually normal/mildly elevated, diarrhoea, mydriasis. In this case: extremely high CK + rigidity + antipsychotic → NMS more likely. Hunter criteria: if clonus present = SS. (c) NMS: stop haloperidol, ICU, IV fluids, cooling, dantrolene (0.25–2 mg/kg IV q6h), bromocriptine (2.5–10 mg TID), lorazepam for sedation. SS: stop SSRI, cyproheptadine (12 mg loading, 2 mg q2h), benzodiazepines, cooling, ICU if severe.
Quick Review
30 Rapid-Fire Q&A
Format: Question → Answer → Examiner tip where relevant
Q01
What is the mechanism of action of vortioxetine that makes it a "multimodal" antidepressant?
Vortioxetine acts at 6 targets simultaneously: SERT inhibitor + 5-HT1A partial agonist + 5-HT1B partial agonist + 5-HT3 antagonist + 5-HT7 antagonist + 5-HT1D antagonist. The 5-HT3 antagonism increases acetylcholine in the prefrontal cortex, explaining its cognitive benefits. The 5-HT7 antagonism modulates circadian rhythm and sleep architecture.
Exam tip: "Multimodal" = multiple serotonin receptor targets, not just SERT. The cognitive benefit via 5-HT3 antagonism is the most examinable feature distinguishing it from SSRIs.
Q02
What are the Hunter Serotonin Toxicity Criteria? Give any two diagnostic patterns.
Hunter criteria require a serotonergic agent PLUS one of five patterns, all involving clonus or hyperreflexia:
- Spontaneous clonus alone
- Inducible clonus + agitation or diaphoresis
- Ocular clonus + agitation or diaphoresis
- Tremor + hyperreflexia
- Hypertonia + temperature >38°C + ocular or inducible clonus
Sensitivity 84%, specificity 97%, superior to Sternbach criteria.
Exam tip: Clonus is the pathognomonic finding of serotonin syndrome. If you remember nothing else, remember: clonus = serotonin syndrome.
Q03
What is the REMS programme for esketamine, and why is it required?
REMS = Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy. For esketamine (Spravato): drug dispensed only in certified healthcare settings (not pharmacy); patient monitored for 2 hours post-dose for dissociation, sedation, and blood pressure elevation; patient cannot drive on dosing day; healthcare setting must enrol in REMS programme.
Required because of: abuse potential (Schedule III), high rates of dissociation (>50%), significant BP elevation, and the impossibility of safe unsupervised self-administration.
Q04
What is the key difference between NMS and serotonin syndrome on neurological examination?
NMS: lead-pipe rigidity + normal or reduced reflexes + NO clonus.
Serotonin syndrome: clonus (spontaneous, inducible, ocular) + hyperreflexia + mild-to-moderate rigidity.
Clonus is present in SS and absent in NMS. This single finding is the most reliable bedside differentiator.
Q05
Name the three approved dual orexin receptor antagonists (DORAs) and their half-lives.
- Suvorexant (Belsomra), ~12 hours, FDA 2014
- Lemborexant (Dayvigo), ~17–27 hours, FDA 2019
- Daridorexant (Quviviq), ~8 hours, FDA 2022
Daridorexant has the shortest half-life and the best next-day performance profile. Lemborexant has the longest half-life and is preferred for sleep maintenance in elderly patients.
Q06
What is the TRS definition required before initiating clozapine (TRRIP consensus)?
Inadequate response (CGI-S ≥4, persistent positive symptoms) despite:
- ≥2 adequate antipsychotic trials
- At least one must be a second-generation antipsychotic
- Each trial at adequate dose (≥600 mg chlorpromazine equivalents)
- Each trial for adequate duration (≥6 weeks)
- With documented adherence
Q07
What is the clozapine ANC monitoring schedule?
- Weeks 1–26: Weekly ANC
- Weeks 27–52: Every 2 weeks
- After 52 weeks: Monthly
Thresholds: ≥1500 = continue; 1000–1499 = continue with increased monitoring; 500–999 = interrupt and monitor daily; <500 = STOP permanently (agranulocytosis, never re-challenge).
Q08
What is the mechanism of brexanolone and how does it differ from benzodiazepines?
Brexanolone is synthetic allopregnanolone, a positive allosteric modulator (PAM) of GABA-A receptors. Unlike benzodiazepines which modulate only synaptic γ2-subunit-containing GABA-A receptors, brexanolone modulates BOTH synaptic (γ2-containing) AND extrasynaptic (δ-subunit-containing) GABA-A receptors. Extrasynaptic GABA-A receptors mediate tonic inhibition in limbic regions, this is the proposed mechanism for the rapid antidepressant effect specific to postpartum depression.
Q09
What is the washout period required between fluoxetine and an MAOI, and why is it different from other SSRIs?
5 weeks, because fluoxetine has an active metabolite, norfluoxetine, with a half-life of approximately 4–16 days. At 5 half-lives of norfluoxetine, the drug is substantially cleared. All other SSRIs and SNRIs require only 2 weeks washout before starting an MAOI.
Going from MAOI to any serotonergic drug: always 2 weeks minimum (3 weeks for irreversible MAOIs like phenelzine and tranylcypromine in clinical practice).
Q10
What is the mechanism by which smoking reduces clozapine levels, and what is the clinical implication?
Cigarette smoke contains polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) that strongly induce CYP1A2. Clozapine is metabolised primarily by CYP1A2. Heavy smokers (>10 cigarettes/day) may require 50–100% higher clozapine doses to achieve therapeutic levels.
Clinical implication: if a patient stops smoking (e.g., admitted to hospital), CYP1A2 induction is lost → clozapine levels rise → toxicity risk. Monitor clozapine levels with any change in smoking status.
Q11
What is the clinical significance of D3 receptor selectivity in cariprazine?
D3 receptors are concentrated in mesolimbic areas, prefrontal cortex, and hippocampus, circuits governing motivation, reward, and cognition. Cariprazine has 20× selectivity for D3 over D2. High-affinity D3 partial agonism is proposed to improve negative symptoms of schizophrenia (avolition, anhedonia) by restoring reward salience and motivational drive. The RGH-MD-16 trial demonstrated statistically significant superiority of cariprazine over risperidone on PANSS negative symptom scores, the first such finding in a head-to-head trial.
Q12
Name four drugs that raise lithium levels and explain one mechanism.
- NSAIDs, reduce renal prostaglandins → ↓renal blood flow → ↓lithium clearance
- ACE inhibitors/ARBs, reduce glomerular filtration rate → lithium retention
- Thiazide diuretics, sodium depletion → compensatory lithium retention in proximal tubule
- Dehydration/low-sodium diet, same mechanism as thiazides (proximal tubule Na/Li competition)
NSAIDs raise lithium levels by 50–100%. Activated charcoal does NOT help in lithium toxicity.
Q13
What are the indications for haemodialysis in lithium toxicity?
- Lithium level >4.0 mmol/L (regardless of symptoms)
- Lithium level >2.5 mmol/L with severe symptoms (seizures, coma, cardiovascular instability)
- Anuric renal failure with any toxic level (cannot excrete lithium renally)
- Rapidly rising lithium level despite IV saline
Q14
What is lumateperone's novel mechanism compared to all other antipsychotics?
Lumateperone is the only antipsychotic that acts as a D1 receptor agonist/partial agonist in the prefrontal cortex. All other antipsychotics either block D1 or have no D1 activity. Prefrontal D1 stimulation is predicted to improve cognition and negative symptoms. Additionally, lumateperone has dual D2 activity (pre-synaptic agonist + post-synaptic antagonist) and SERT inhibition, explaining its approval for both schizophrenia and bipolar I + II depression.
Exam tip: "Lumateperone turns D1 ON", this is the single most examinable novelty.
Q15
What distinguishes pimavanserin from all other antipsychotics, and what is its approved indication?
Pimavanserin has NO dopamine receptor binding, it is a 5-HT2A and 5-HT2C inverse agonist only. This makes it the only antipsychotic that does not worsen motor symptoms in Parkinson's disease. It is FDA-approved specifically for Parkinson's disease psychosis (PDP), the only drug with this indication. Because it avoids D2 blockade, it does not cause EPS, worsening of tremor/rigidity, or prolactin elevation.
Q16
What is the mechanism of Auvelity (dextromethorphan-bupropion) and why are the two drugs combined?
Dextromethorphan (DXM) is an uncompetitive NMDA receptor antagonist and sigma-1 receptor agonist with ketamine-like antidepressant mechanisms. However, DXM is rapidly metabolised by CYP2D6 in extensive metabolisers. Bupropion is a potent CYP2D6 inhibitor, when co-administered, it raises DXM levels 8-fold to therapeutic concentrations. Bupropion also contributes NDRI antidepressant activity independently. The combination achieves NMDA antagonism via an oral route without requiring IV administration or REMS.
Q17
What are the four cardinal features of NMS?
- Hyperthermia (>38°C, often >40°C)
- Lead-pipe muscle rigidity (generalised, severe)
- Altered consciousness (confusion → stupor → coma)
- Autonomic instability (tachycardia, labile BP, diaphoresis, tachypnoea)
Supporting findings: very elevated CK (>1000 U/L), leukocytosis, low serum iron, metabolic acidosis, myoglobinuria.
Q18
What is supersensitivity psychosis and how do you prevent it?
Supersensitivity psychosis occurs after abrupt antipsychotic discontinuation. Chronic D2 blockade → compensatory upregulation of D2 receptors. Abrupt withdrawal → dopaminergic rebound → florid psychosis within days, often more severe and atypical than the original illness.
Prevention: gradual taper, minimum 3–6 months for long-term use; for clozapine: 6–12 months taper. Never abruptly stop antipsychotics in chronic schizophrenia.
Q19
What is the CYP2D6 ultrarapid metaboliser phenotype and its clinical significance in psychiatry?
Ultrarapid metabolisers (UM) carry duplicated or amplified CYP2D6 genes, they metabolise CYP2D6 substrates very rapidly, resulting in sub-therapeutic drug levels. Clinical consequence: patients on tricyclic antidepressants, risperidone, aripiprazole, or haloperidol may show treatment failure at standard doses. Prevalence: ~1–2% Caucasians; up to 29% in Ethiopian populations.
Codeine (a prodrug activated by CYP2D6 to morphine): UMs may produce excessive morphine → toxicity risk. PMs get no analgesia.
Q20
What is HLA-B*1502 and when must it be tested?
HLA-B*1502 is a genetic variant of the Human Leukocyte Antigen complex found predominantly in individuals of East and Southeast Asian descent (Han Chinese ~10%, Thai ~8%, South Asian ~2–4%). Carriers who receive carbamazepine face dramatically elevated risk of Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN), life-threatening mucocutaneous reactions.
Must be tested: before initiating carbamazepine (or oxcarbazepine) in any patient of Asian ancestry. FDA label mandates this testing. If positive → do not prescribe carbamazepine; use valproate or lamotrigine instead.
Q21
Enumerate the evidence-based FDA-approved augmentation strategies for treatment-resistant depression.
- Aripiprazole + antidepressant (SSRI/SNRI), FDA approved
- Quetiapine XR + antidepressant, FDA approved
- Brexpiprazole + antidepressant, FDA approved
- Olanzapine + fluoxetine (OFC), FDA approved (bipolar depression + TRD)
- Esketamine nasal spray + oral antidepressant, FDA approved (TRD 2019; MDSI 2020)
Non-FDA approved but Level I evidence: lithium augmentation of antidepressants.
Q22
What is the peripartum mechanism hypothesis for postpartum depression and how does brexanolone target it?
During pregnancy, progesterone is metabolised to allopregnanolone → GABA-A receptor adaptations to chronically elevated allopregnanolone (downregulation of surface receptors, subunit changes). At delivery, allopregnanolone falls precipitously → GABA-A receptor excitability surge → PPD in vulnerable women.
Brexanolone = synthetic allopregnanolone. IV administration replaces the lost allopregnanolone signal, restoring GABA-A function → rapid antidepressant effect within 24–48 hours. This is pharmacologically distinct from SSRIs, which act on monoamine systems and take 4–8 weeks.
Q23
What are the prerequisites for switching from paliperidone palmitate 1-monthly (PP1M) to 3-monthly (PP3M)?
- Patient must have been adequately treated with PP1M for at least 4 months
- Last two consecutive PP1M doses must be at the same dose level (dose must be stable)
- PP3M dose = 3.5 × PP1M dose
- PP3M can be administered at deltoid or gluteal sites (unlike PP1M which requires deltoid for first two doses)
Q24
What is the Ashton Protocol and when is it used?
The Ashton Protocol is a benzodiazepine tapering method developed by Prof. Heather Ashton. Key principles:
- Convert all short-acting benzodiazepines to equivalent diazepam dose
- Reduce diazepam dose by approximately 10% every 1–2 weeks
- Taper can take months to years for long-term high-dose users
- Adjuncts: carbamazepine or valproate to reduce seizure risk during taper
Used for: benzodiazepine dependence management. Prevents withdrawal seizures and delirium while minimising protracted withdrawal syndrome.
Q25
What is pimavanserin's key safety concern and the FDA black box warning?
QTc prolongation, pimavanserin carries moderate QTc prolongation risk. Avoid with other QTc-prolonging drugs (antiarrhythmics, some antipsychotics, azithromycin).
FDA black box warning: increased risk of death in elderly patients with dementia-related psychosis (class warning shared by all antipsychotics). Despite its Parkinson's Disease Psychosis approval, this warning applies and pimavanserin should not be used for dementia-related psychosis outside of PDP.
Q26
What is the mechanism of action of psilocybin in depression and what neural network does it disrupt?
Psilocybin is dephosphorylated to psilocin → 5-HT2A agonist in prefrontal cortex, anterior cingulate, thalamus, and limbic areas.
Key neural network disrupted: Default Mode Network (DMN), the medial prefrontal cortex, posterior cingulate cortex, and angular gyrus network. The DMN is hyperconnected in depression and mediates self-referential rumination. Psilocin disrupts DMN connectivity → ego dissolution + reduced rumination. Simultaneously increases global brain connectivity (hyperconnected state) and promotes neuroplasticity via BDNF-mTOR-synaptogenesis cascade.
Q27
What is the clinical significance of valproate inhibiting UGT enzymes?
Valproate inhibits UDP-glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) enzymes, specifically UGT1A4 and UGT2B7. Clinical consequence: lamotrigine is primarily metabolised by UGT. When valproate is added to lamotrigine, lamotrigine levels double.
Practical rule: When adding valproate to a patient already on lamotrigine → halve the lamotrigine dose immediately. When starting lamotrigine in a patient already on valproate → use half the usual lamotrigine titration schedule. Failure to follow this → lamotrigine toxicity and potentially Stevens-Johnson syndrome.
Q28
What distinguishes brexpiprazole from aripiprazole pharmacologically?
Both are dopamine partial agonists. Key differences:
- Brexpiprazole has LOWER intrinsic activity at D2 than aripiprazole (more antagonist-like behaviour)
- Brexpiprazole has MORE potent 5-HT1A partial agonism
- Brexpiprazole has MORE potent α1B and α2C adrenergic antagonism
- Clinical result: brexpiprazole causes LESS akathisia than aripiprazole
- Brexpiprazole is FDA-approved for Alzheimer's disease agitation (2023), aripiprazole is not approved for this
Exam tip: "Brexpiprazole = aripiprazole with less akathisia and approved for dementia agitation."
Q29
What are the three phases of psilocybin-assisted psychotherapy?
- Preparation sessions (2–3 sessions): Build therapeutic alliance; set intentions; psychoeducation about the experience; reduce anticipatory anxiety; establish safety protocols
- Drug session(s) (1–3 sessions): Supervised in a carefully designed environment (comfortable room, curated music, eye shades); therapist present throughout 6–8 hours; non-directive supportive presence
- Integration sessions (2–4 sessions): Process the experience; translate insights into behaviour change; CBT-like work; address challenging content from the drug session
The set (psychological state/intention), setting (physical and relational environment), and therapeutic relationship are considered pharmacologically relevant to outcomes, not just the drug.
Q30
What is the dose conversion rule for PP3M and what does PDSS mean in the context of LAI antipsychotics?
PP3M dose conversion: PP3M dose (mg) = PP1M monthly dose (mg) × 3.5
Example: Patient on PP1M 78 mg monthly → PP3M 273 mg every 3 months (nearest available dose: 263 mg)
PDSS = Post-Injection Delirium/Sedation Syndrome, a rare but serious adverse effect unique to olanzapine pamoate (Zypadhera). It occurs when olanzapine pamoate crystals enter the bloodstream during injection, releasing a bolus of olanzapine rapidly → sudden sedation, delirium, or cardiovascular collapse. Incidence: ~0.07% per injection. Management: 3-hour mandatory monitoring in a healthcare setting after every injection. This is why olanzapine pamoate requires on-site monitoring unlike other LAIs.
QUICK RECALL SUMMARY TABLE
| Q# | Topic | Key Answer (one line) |
|---|---|---|
| 01 | Vortioxetine mechanism | SERT + 5-HT1A/1B partial agonist + 5-HT3/7/1D antagonist |
| 02 | Hunter criteria | Clonus (in 4 of 5 patterns) + hyperreflexia required |
| 03 | Esketamine REMS | Certified setting; 2h monitoring; no driving |
| 04 | SS vs NMS bedside | Clonus = SS; Lead-pipe rigidity = NMS |
| 05 | Three DORAs | Suvorexant / Lemborexant / Daridorexant |
| 06 | TRS definition | ≥2 APs, adequate dose, ≥6 weeks each, documented adherence |
| 07 | Clozapine ANC schedule | Weekly → Fortnightly → Monthly (after 1 year) |
| 08 | Brexanolone vs BZDs | Modulates extrasynaptic δ-GABA-A (BZDs do not) |
| 09 | Fluoxetine MAOI washout | 5 weeks (norfluoxetine); other SSRIs = 2 weeks |
| 10 | Smoking + clozapine | CYP1A2 induction → reduced levels; stopping = toxicity risk |
| 11 | Cariprazine D3 | 20× D3 selectivity; negative symptom evidence |
| 12 | Lithium level raisers | NSAIDs, ACEi, thiazides, dehydration |
| 13 | Haemodialysis trigger | Level >4; or >2.5 + severe symptoms; anuric renal failure |
| 14 | Lumateperone novel feature | Only AP with D1 agonism in PFC |
| 15 | Pimavanserin key feature | No D2 binding; 5-HT2A inverse agonist; PDP only |
| 16 | Auvelity mechanism | BUP inhibits CYP2D6 → DXM levels rise 8× → NMDA antagonism |
| 17 | NMS tetrad | Fever + Rigidity + Altered consciousness + Autonomic instability |
| 18 | Supersensitivity psychosis | D2 upregulation → rebound psychosis after abrupt AP stop |
| 19 | CYP2D6 UM | Sub-therapeutic levels; treatment failure; 29% Ethiopians |
| 20 | HLA-B*1502 | Carbamazepine + Asian descent = SJS/TEN risk; mandatory testing |
| 21 | FDA augmentation for TRD | Aripiprazole, quetiapine, brexpiprazole, OFC, esketamine |
| 22 | PPD mechanism | Allopregnanolone crash postpartum → GABA-A hyperexcitability |
| 23 | PP3M prerequisites | 4 months stable PP1M; same dose last 2 injections; ×3.5 dose |
| 24 | Ashton Protocol | 10%/1–2 weeks diazepam taper for BZD dependence |
| 25 | Pimavanserin BBW | Elderly dementia mortality (class warning); QTc risk |
| 26 | Psilocybin neural target | DMN disruption; global connectivity increase; BDNF/mTOR |
| 27 | Valproate + lamotrigine | Halve lamotrigine dose (UGT inhibition raises levels 2×) |
| 28 | Brexpiprazole vs aripiprazole | Lower D2 intrinsic activity; less akathisia; approved AD agitation |
| 29 | Psilocybin therapy phases | Preparation → Drug session → Integration |
| 30 | PP3M dose + PDSS | PP3M = 3.5 × PP1M; PDSS = olanzapine pamoate only; 3h monitoring |