← All study guides
Guide 07 · Part II

Mood Disorders

Paper II · Clinical Psychiatry. Six study modes, from notes to quick review.

Most askedBipolar pharmacological managementLithium monitoring and toxicityTreatment-resistant depressionSuicide risk assessmentNewer antidepressants esketamineDepression in elderly
Jump to a section
Chapter 01

Study Notes


SECTION 1: BIPOLAR DISORDER

1.1 Epidemiology

Parameter · Value
Lifetime prevalence BP-I 1-1.5%
Lifetime prevalence BP-II 0.4-1.1%
Bipolar spectrum (including sub-threshold) 2.4-4.7%
Male:Female ratio BP-I 1:1
Male:Female ratio BP-II Female predominance
Mean age of onset 20-25 years (BP-I), slightly later for BP-II
Delay to correct diagnosis Average 5-10 years
Comorbidity rate >60% have at least one comorbid condition
Suicide rate 15-20x general population; ~25-50% attempt; 10-15% complete

Key Indian data:


1.2 Classification: BP-I vs BP-II vs Cyclothymia

FeatureBP-IBP-IICyclothymia
Manic episodesYes (at least 1)No (only hypomania)No
Hypomanic episodesMay occurYes (at least 1)Hypomanic symptoms (sub-threshold)
Major depressive episodesCommon but NOT required for diagnosisYes (at least 1)Depressive symptoms (sub-threshold)
Duration requirementMania >= 7 days (or hospitalization)Hypomania >= 4 consecutive days>= 2 years (1 year in adolescents)
Functional impairmentMarked (mania)Hypomania: no marked impairment; depression: significantPersistent mild instability
Psychotic featuresCan occur in mania or depressionOnly in depression (if present, reclassify to BP-I)No
HospitalizationCommon in maniaLess commonRare
Exam Pearl

If a patient presenting with hypomania develops even one psychotic feature, the diagnosis is upgraded to BP-I.


1.3 Clinical Features of Mania: DIGFAST

LetterFeatureClinical Detail
DDistractibilityAttention drawn to irrelevant stimuli
IIndiscretion / ImpulsivityReckless behavior, spending sprees, sexual indiscretions, foolish investments
GGrandiosityInflated self-esteem, may reach delusional proportions
FFlight of ideasRacing thoughts, rapid topic shifting, clang associations
AActivity increasePsychomotor agitation, increased goal-directed activity
SSleep deficitDecreased need for sleep (NOT insomnia, patient feels rested with 2-3 hours)
TTalkativenessPressured speech, difficult to interrupt, loud

DSM-5 Criteria for Manic Episode:


1.4 Hypomania vs Mania

FeatureHypomaniaMania
Duration>= 4 consecutive days>= 7 days (or any duration if hospitalized)
SeverityObservable change in functioning, NOT marked impairmentMarked impairment in functioning
Psychotic featuresNEVER presentCan be present
HospitalizationNOT requiredMay be required
Functional impactMay actually improve functioning transientlyCauses significant dysfunction
Social/occupational disruptionMildSevere
Subjective experienceOften ego-syntonic ("I feel great")May lose insight entirely
Exam Pearl

If any psychotic feature is present during a "hypomanic" episode, it is mania by definition, and the diagnosis is BP-I.


1.5 Mixed Features (DSM-5 Specifier)

DSM-5 replaced the old "mixed episode" (DSM-IV) with a specifier that can be applied to either manic/hypomanic or depressive episodes.

Manic/hypomanic episode with mixed features (>= 3 depressive symptoms):

Depressive episode with mixed features (>= 3 manic/hypomanic symptoms):

Clinical significance:


1.6 Rapid Cycling

Definition: >= 4 mood episodes (any combination of mania, hypomania, depression) in a 12-month period. Episodes demarcated by either remission (>= 2 months) or switch to opposite polarity.

Risk factors:

Management considerations:


1.7 Course and Outcome

Kraepelin's Original Observations
Modern Course Data
Parameter · Data
Average number of lifetime episodes 8-12
Mean episode duration (mania) 4-6 months (untreated)
Mean episode duration (depression) 6-12 months
Inter-episode interval Decreases over time (kindling)
First episode polarity ~50% depressive, ~50% manic/mixed
Time spent in depression vs mania Depression predominates (3:1 ratio in BP-I, higher in BP-II)
Full inter-episode recovery Only ~40-50% achieve complete functional recovery
Subsyndromal symptoms between episodes Present in ~50-60%
Cognitive impairment Documented even in euthymia, executive function, verbal memory
Occupational disability ~30-40% experience significant occupational impairment
Prognostic Factors
Good Prognosis · Poor Prognosis
Late onset Early onset
Few episodes Frequent episodes
Male sex (some studies) Rapid cycling
Absence of mixed features Mixed features
Good inter-episode functioning Poor inter-episode functioning
Compliance with treatment Comorbid substance use
Good social support Comorbid personality disorder
Absence of psychotic features Psychotic features
Classical euphoric mania Mood-incongruent psychotic features

1.8 Genetics of Bipolar Disorder

Parameter · Data
Heritability ~85% (one of the most heritable psychiatric disorders)
First-degree relative risk 5-10x general population
MZ twin concordance 40-70%
DZ twin concordance 5-10%
Adoption studies Support genetic contribution over environment
Overlap with schizophrenia genetics Significant, shared risk loci at CACNA1C, ANK3, ODZ4
Polygenic risk Hundreds of common variants, each small effect

Key genes/loci:

Genetic overlap:


1.9 Neurobiology of Bipolar Disorder

Kindling Model (Post & Weiss)
Circadian Rhythm Disruption
Mitochondrial Dysfunction
Other Neurobiological Models

SECTION 2: BIPOLAR DISORDER MANAGEMENT

2.1 Lithium

Mechanism of Action
Therapeutic Range and Monitoring
Acute mania 0.8-1.2 mEq/L
Maintenance 0.6-1.0 mEq/L (0.6-0.8 for elderly)
Toxicity threshold >1.5 mEq/L
Time to steady state 5-7 days
Blood level timing 12 hours post last dose (trough level)
Monitoring Schedule
TestBaselineEvery 6 monthsAs indicated
Serum lithiumYesYes (after stabilization, q3-6 months)After dose change (5-7 days later)
Renal function (creatinine, eGFR)YesYesSymptoms of renal impairment
Thyroid (TSH, free T4)YesYesSymptoms of hypothyroidism
Calcium/parathyroidYesYes (annually minimum)Symptoms of hypercalcemia
ECGYes (>40 years or cardiac history)Annual if elderlyCardiac symptoms
Weight/BMIYesYes
Pregnancy testYes (women of childbearing age)Before starting
FBCYesAnnually
Side Effects

Early/common:

Long-term:

Lithium Toxicity
SeverityLevel (mEq/L)Features
Mild1.5-2.0Coarse tremor, nausea, diarrhea, drowsiness, muscular weakness
Moderate2.0-2.5Ataxia, dysarthria, confusion, hyperreflexia, myoclonic jerks
Severe>2.5Seizures, coma, renal failure, cardiovascular collapse, death

Management of lithium toxicity:

  1. STOP lithium immediately
  2. IV normal saline (0.9% NaCl), aggressive hydration
  3. Monitor serum lithium levels every 2-4 hours
  4. Monitor renal function, electrolytes
  5. Correct dehydration and sodium depletion
  6. Avoid diuretics (especially thiazides, increase lithium reabsorption)
  7. Hemodialysis if: level >4.0 mEq/L, level >2.5 with severe symptoms, renal failure, deteriorating despite supportive care
  8. Whole bowel irrigation if recent ingestion of sustained-release preparation
  9. Monitor for rebound, redistribution from tissues can cause level to rise again after dialysis

Common precipitants of toxicity:


2.2 Valproate (Sodium Valproate / Divalproex)

Mechanism
Therapeutic Range
Monitoring
Side Effects
Valproate in Women of Childbearing Age
Exam Pearl

Recent guideline changes, EMA (2018): Banned valproate in pregnancy and women of childbearing age unless Pregnancy Prevention Programme in place. MHRA (UK): Similar restrictions. NICE: Recommends against valproate in women/girls of childbearing potential. Indian guidelines increasingly following this trend. If absolutely necessary: informed consent, effective contraception, regular pregnancy tests, folic acid (5mg).


2.3 Carbamazepine

Mechanism
Key Pharmacological Features
HLA-B*1502 Screening
Side Effects
Drug Interactions (major exam topic)

2.4 Lamotrigine

Key Features
Titration: SJS Risk (CRITICAL)
Side Effects

2.5 Atypical Antipsychotics in Bipolar Disorder

DrugAcute ManiaBipolar DepressionMaintenanceNotes
QuetiapineYesYes (FDA approved)YesOnly drug approved for both poles + maintenance
OlanzapineYesYes (olanzapine-fluoxetine combo)YesSignificant metabolic effects
AripiprazoleYesLimited evidenceYesWeight-neutral, akathisia common
LurasidoneNoYes (FDA approved)Take with food (>350 kcal), no metabolic burden
CariprazineYesYes (FDA approved)YesD3-preferring partial agonist; emerging evidence
RisperidoneYesNoLimitedMore EPS than others
ZiprasidoneYesNoLimitedQTc monitoring
AsenapineYesNoYesSublingual administration

2.6 Acute Mania: Treatment Algorithm

Step 1: Assess severity, rule out medical causes, assess safety

Step 2: First-line pharmacotherapy

Step 3: If inadequate response (2-4 weeks):

Step 4: Treatment-resistant mania:


2.7 Bipolar Depression: Management (HIGH-YIELD EXAM TOPIC)

Exam Pearl

Do NOT give antidepressant monotherapy in bipolar depression, risk of manic switch and cycle acceleration.

First-line options:

  1. Quetiapine monotherapy (300mg, the BOLDER trials)
  2. Lithium monotherapy (evidence moderate)
  3. Lamotrigine (better for prevention than acute treatment, but used)
  4. Lurasidone (with or without lithium/valproate)
  5. Cariprazine (1.5mg, recent FDA approval)
  6. Olanzapine-fluoxetine combination (OFC)

If adding antidepressant (not first-line):

Other options:


2.8 Maintenance Treatment

Goal: Prevent relapse of both manic and depressive episodes

AgentPrevents ManiaPrevents DepressionAnti-suicide
Lithium+++++Yes (unique)
Valproate++++No
Lamotrigine++++No
Quetiapine++++No
Aripiprazole+++No
Olanzapine+++No
Carbamazepine+++No

Lithium remains the gold standard for maintenance, especially for classical euphoric mania, strong family history, good inter-episode functioning. Its anti-suicidal effect is unique and well-established (Cipriani et al., 2013 meta-analysis).


SECTION 3: DEPRESSION

3.1 Epidemiology

Parameter · Value
Lifetime prevalence 10-20% (varies by population)
Point prevalence 5-8%
Female:Male ratio 2:1
Mean age of onset 25-35 years (getting younger in recent cohorts)
Recurrence risk 50% after first episode, 80% after second, 90% after third
Global disease burden #1 cause of disability worldwide (WHO)
Indian data (NMHS 2016) ~5.25% prevalence for mood disorders

3.2 Diagnostic Criteria

ICD-11 Depressive Episode

Core symptoms (at least 1 required):

  1. Depressed mood
  2. Diminished interest or pleasure (anhedonia)

Accessory symptoms:

  1. Reduced concentration and attention
  2. Reduced self-esteem and self-confidence
  3. Ideas of guilt and unworthiness
  4. Bleak and pessimistic views of the future
  5. Ideas or acts of self-harm or suicide
  6. Disturbed sleep
  7. Diminished appetite

Severity grading:

DSM-5 Major Depressive Episode: SIG E CAPS + Depressed Mood

Five or more of the following for >= 2 weeks (must include depressed mood or anhedonia):

Mnemonic · Symptom
S Sleep disturbance (insomnia or hypersomnia)
I Interest loss (anhedonia)
G Guilt (excessive or inappropriate)
E Energy loss / fatigue
C Concentration difficulty / indecisiveness
A Appetite change (increase or decrease) / weight change
P Psychomotor agitation or retardation
S Suicidal ideation
+ Depressed mood (most of the day, nearly every day)

3.3 Subtypes of Depression

Melancholic Features
Atypical Features
Psychotic Features (Depression with Psychotic Symptoms)
Seasonal Affective Disorder (SAD)
Peripartum Depression

3.4 Biological Basis of Depression

Monoamine Hypothesis (Classic)
HPA Axis Dysregulation
Neuroplasticity and BDNF
Neuroinflammation
Glutamate Model

SECTION 4: TREATMENT-RESISTANT DEPRESSION (TRD)

4.1 Definition

TRD = failure to achieve adequate response after >= 2 adequate antidepressant trials from different pharmacological classes, each at adequate dose and duration (>= 6-8 weeks at therapeutic dose).

"Adequate trial" means:

Pseudo-resistance (rule out first):

4.2 TRD Staging

Thase-Rush Staging Model
Stage · Failed Treatment
Stage I Failure of >= 1 adequate SSRI trial
Stage II Failure of >= 1 adequate trial of different class (e.g., SNRI, TCA)
Stage III Failure of adequate TCA trial
Stage IV Failure of adequate MAOI trial
Stage V Failure of bilateral ECT course
Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) Staging Model

4.3 TRD Management Algorithm

Step 1, Optimization:

Step 2, Switching:

Step 3, Augmentation:

Step 4, Combination:

Step 5, Esketamine (Spravato):

Step 6, ECT:

Step 7, Neuromodulation and emerging:


SECTION 5: DEPRESSION IN THE ELDERLY

5.1 Vascular Depression Hypothesis (Alexopoulos)

5.2 Pseudodementia vs Dementia

FeaturePseudodementia (Depression)Dementia
OnsetRelatively acute, dateableInsidious, family notices before patient
Cognitive complaintsEmphasized by patient ("I can't remember anything")Minimized by patient, noticed by family
Effort on testing"Don't know" answers, gives up easilyTries hard, confabulates, near-miss answers
MoodPervasive sadness, anhedoniaMood may be labile or apathetic but not pervasively sad
Diurnal variationOften present (worse in morning)Sundowning (worse in evening)
SleepEarly morning awakeningFragmented, reversed sleep-wake
Memory patternInconsistent; similar impairment for recent and remoteRecent > remote memory loss (temporal gradient)
HistoryPsychiatric history, psychosocial stressorsMay have vascular risk factors, gradual decline
Response to treatmentImproves with antidepressantsDoes not improve
NeuroimagingMay be normal or show white matter changesAtrophy, especially hippocampal
Exam Pearl

Pseudodementia is a major risk factor for developing true dementia later (30-50% within 5 years).

5.3 Management in Elderly

Principles:


SECTION 6: SUICIDE

6.1 Epidemiology: India

Parameter · Data
Suicide rate (India, NCRB 2021) ~12 per 100,000 population
India's share of global suicides ~36% of female suicides, ~24% of male suicides worldwide
Peak age group 18-30 years (India's suicides skew younger than Western countries)
Male:Female ratio (completed suicide) ~1.7:1 (narrower gap than Western countries)
Most common method Hanging (most common), poisoning (pesticides, significant in rural India)
Farming suicides Major public health concern; linked to debt, crop failure, drought
Student suicides Rising trend; academic pressure, competitive exams
Section 309 IPC Decriminalized (Mental Healthcare Act 2017, Section 115), attempted suicide presumed to be under severe stress; person to be treated, not prosecuted

6.2 Risk Factors: SAD PERSONS

LetterFactorDetail
SSexMale (completed), Female (attempted)
AAgeElderly (>65) and young adults (15-30)
DDepressionMajor depression, bipolar, schizophrenia
PPrevious attemptSTRONGEST predictor of future suicide
EEthanol/substance abuseAcute intoxication + chronic use
RRational thinking lossPsychosis, severe cognitive distortion
SSocial supports lackingIsolation, living alone, unemployment
OOrganized planSpecific method, access to means, preparation
NNo spouseSingle, divorced, widowed
SSicknessChronic illness, chronic pain, terminal illness

Additional risk factors:

6.3 Assessment

Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)
Assessment Framework (every evaluation should include)
  1. Ideation: Passive ("wish I were dead") vs active ("want to kill myself")
  2. Plan: Specific method? Timeframe?
  3. Means: Access to method? (firearms, medications, pesticides)
  4. Intent: How strong is the desire? What are the reasons for living?
  5. Preparedness: Giving away possessions, writing notes, saying goodbyes
  6. Risk factors: Inventory of SAD PERSONS + additional
  7. Protective factors: Reasons for living, children, religious beliefs, social connectedness, therapeutic alliance
  8. Recent changes: Sudden calm after agitation (may indicate decision made), recent discharge, recent loss

6.4 Protective Factors

6.5 Management and Prevention

Individual Level
Population Level

SECTION 7: ANTIDEPRESSANTS

7.1 Classification and Mechanisms

SSRIs (Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors)
Drug · Unique Features
Fluoxetine Long half-life (2-6 days, norfluoxetine 4-16 days); activating; CYP2D6 inhibitor; only SSRI approved for children
Sertraline Mild DA reuptake inhibition; preferred in cardiac patients (SADHART trial); preferred in breastfeeding
Paroxetine Most anticholinergic SSRI; potent CYP2D6 inhibitor; worst discontinuation syndrome; teratogenic (cardiac defects, avoid in pregnancy)
Fluvoxamine CYP1A2 inhibitor; primarily for OCD; significant drug interactions
Escitalopram S-enantiomer of citalopram; cleanest side effect profile; most selective SSRI
Citalopram QTc prolongation at high doses; dose cap 40mg (20mg in elderly)

Class side effects: GI (nausea, diarrhea), sexual dysfunction (30-40%), headache, insomnia or sedation, weight gain (long-term), activation/anxiety initially, hyponatremia (SIADH, especially elderly), bleeding risk (platelet serotonin depletion)

SNRIs (Serotonin-Norepinephrine Reuptake Inhibitors)
Drug · Unique Features
Venlafaxine Dose-dependent: serotonergic at low dose (<150mg), noradrenergic at higher dose; dose-dependent hypertension; lethal in overdose (relative to SSRIs)
Duloxetine Also approved for neuropathic pain, fibromyalgia, GAD; hepatotoxicity risk; avoid in liver disease
Desvenlafaxine Active metabolite of venlafaxine; fewer drug interactions; more predictable pharmacokinetics
Milnacipran Primarily for fibromyalgia (India); more NE than 5-HT effect

Class side effects: Similar to SSRIs + hypertension (NE effect), sweating, dry mouth, constipation, urinary retention

TCAs (Tricyclic Antidepressants)
DrugRelative ActivityUnique Features
Amitriptyline5-HT > NEMost sedating; used for pain, migraine prophylaxis
Imipramine5-HT ≈ NEAlso used for enuresis; active metabolite = desipramine
Clomipramine5-HT >> NEMost serotonergic TCA; gold standard for OCD
NortriptylineNE > 5-HTLeast hypotensive TCA; therapeutic window (50-150 ng/mL)
DesipramineNE >> 5-HTMost noradrenergic; least sedating/anticholinergic

Class side effects: Anticholinergic (dry mouth, constipation, urinary retention, blurred vision, cognitive impairment), cardiac (QTc prolongation, arrhythmias, lethal in overdose), sedation (H1 blockade), orthostatic hypotension (alpha-1 blockade), weight gain, seizure threshold lowering

TCA overdose: lethal due to cardiac toxicity (widened QRS, arrhythmias); management = sodium bicarbonate IV, cardiac monitoring, activated charcoal if early

MAOIs (Monoamine Oxidase Inhibitors)
DrugTypeFeatures
PhenelzineNon-selective, irreversibleMost studied; effective for atypical depression
TranylcypromineNon-selective, irreversibleAmphetamine-like structure; more activating
IsocarboxazidNon-selective, irreversibleLess commonly used
MoclobemideSelective MAO-A, reversible (RIMA)Fewer dietary restrictions; less potent; available in India
Selegiline patchSelective MAO-B at low doseTransdermal; bypasses first-pass fewer dietary restrictions at low dose

Tyramine reaction ("cheese effect"): Inhibition of MAO-A in gut allows tyramine from fermented foods to enter circulation NE release hypertensive crisis. Avoid: aged cheese, wine, beer, fermented foods, fava beans, cured meats.

Serotonin syndrome: Combination of MAOI + serotonergic drug (SSRI, SNRI, meperidine, tramadol, dextromethorphan, St. John's wort) hyperthermia, agitation, myoclonus, hyperreflexia, diarrhea, autonomic instability, potentially fatal. Washout period: 2 weeks for most SSRIs; 5 weeks for fluoxetine (long half-life) before starting MAOI.

Atypical/Other Antidepressants
DrugMechanismKey Features
MirtazapineNaSSA (alpha-2 antagonist + 5-HT2A/2C/3 blockade + H1 blockade)Sedating (especially <15mg due to H1 predominance); weight gain; no sexual dysfunction; no nausea; good for elderly with insomnia/poor appetite
BupropionNDRI (NE + DA reuptake inhibition)Activating; no sexual dysfunction; helps with smoking cessation; CONTRAINDICATED in eating disorders and seizure disorders; weight neutral
VortioxetineMultimodal: 5-HT reuptake inhibition + 5-HT1A agonism + 5-HT3/7 antagonismPro-cognitive effects; may improve cognitive symptoms of depression; less sexual dysfunction; GI side effects
AgomelatineMT1/MT2 melatonin agonist + 5-HT2C antagonistCircadian rhythm resynchronization; no sexual dysfunction; no weight gain; monitor LFTs (hepatotoxicity risk); not available in USA
TianeptineGlutamate modulator (previously thought to enhance 5-HT reuptake)Opioid mu-receptor effects discovered; abuse potential; effective but controlled in some countries
TrazodoneSARI (5-HT2A antagonist + 5-HT reuptake inhibitor)Very sedating at low dose, used primarily as hypnotic; priapism risk (rare); orthostatic hypotension
Newer/Emerging Agents
DrugMechanismStatusKey Features
Esketamine (Spravato)NMDA receptor antagonist (S-enantiomer of ketamine)FDA approved (2019) for TRDIntranasal; rapid onset (hours); REMS program; dissociative side effects; used with oral antidepressant
Brexanolone (Zulresso)GABA-A receptor positive allosteric modulator (allopregnanolone)FDA approved (2019) for postpartum depressionIV infusion over 60 hours; very expensive; limited access; REMS
Zuranolone (Zurzuvae)Oral neuroactive steroid (GABA-A modulator)FDA approved (2023) for PPDOral, 14-day course; first oral medication specifically for PPD
Psilocybin5-HT2A agonist (psychedelic)Phase II/III trialsBreakthrough therapy designation for TRD; single or two doses with psychotherapy; not yet approved
MDMA-assisted therapySerotonin/dopamine/NE releaseFDA review (2024) for PTSDPrimarily PTSD, not depression per se; controversial FDA decision
Dextromethorphan/bupropion (Auvelity)NMDA antagonist/sigma-1 agonist + CYP2D6 inhibitorFDA approved (2022) for MDDRapid onset; novel glutamate mechanism; not specifically for TRD

7.2 Side Effect Profiles: Quick Reference

Side EffectHighest RiskLowest Risk
Sexual dysfunctionParoxetine, SSRIs, SNRIsBupropion, mirtazapine, agomelatine, vortioxetine
Weight gainMirtazapine, TCAs, paroxetineBupropion, fluoxetine (short-term)
SedationMirtazapine, TCAs (amitriptyline), trazodoneBupropion, fluoxetine, venlafaxine
InsomniaFluoxetine, bupropion, venlafaxineMirtazapine, trazodone
GI upsetSSRIs, SNRIs, vortioxetineMirtazapine (5-HT3 blockade = antiemetic)
QTc prolongationCitalopram (>40mg), TCAsSSRIs (except citalopram), bupropion
Seizure riskBupropion (dose-related), TCAsSSRIs
HypertensionVenlafaxine (dose-related), duloxetineSSRIs
Discontinuation syndromeParoxetine, venlafaxineFluoxetine (long half-life, self-tapering)

7.3 Serotonin Syndrome (CRITICAL EXAM TOPIC)

Triad: Mental status changes + Autonomic instability + Neuromuscular hyperactivity

System · Features
Mental Agitation, confusion, delirium, anxiety
Autonomic Hyperthermia, tachycardia, diaphoresis, hypertension, diarrhea, mydriasis
Neuromuscular Myoclonus, hyperreflexia (especially lower limbs), clonus, tremor, rigidity

Hunter Criteria (diagnostic): Must have serotonergic agent PLUS one of:

  1. Spontaneous clonus
  2. Inducible clonus + agitation or diaphoresis
  3. Ocular clonus + agitation or diaphoresis
  4. Tremor + hyperreflexia
  5. Hypertonia + temperature >38C + ocular or inducible clonus

Vs Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome (NMS):

FeatureSerotonin SyndromeNMS
OnsetHours (rapid)Days to weeks (slow)
Causative agentsSerotonergic drugsDopamine antagonists
NeuromuscularMyoclonus, hyperreflexia, CLONUSLead-pipe rigidity, bradyreflexia
PupilsMydriasisNormal
GIDiarrheaNormal or ileus
ResolutionHours to days (if drug stopped)Days to weeks
CK elevationMildMarkedly elevated
TreatmentCyproheptadine (5-HT2A antagonist)Dantrolene, bromocriptine

Management:

  1. Stop all serotonergic agents
  2. Supportive care (IV fluids, cooling, monitoring)
  3. Benzodiazepines for agitation
  4. Cyproheptadine (4-8mg PO, repeat q2h, max 32mg/day), specific antidote
  5. Severe: intubation, paralysis, ICU

SECTION 8: PERSISTENT MOOD DISORDERS

8.1 Persistent Depressive Disorder (Dysthymia)

DSM-5 Criteria:

Management: SSRIs/SNRIs + psychotherapy (CBT, CBASP, Cognitive Behavioral Analysis System of Psychotherapy specifically designed for chronic depression)

8.2 Cyclothymic Disorder

DSM-5 Criteria:

Clinical relevance:

8.3 Disruptive Mood Dysregulation Disorder (DMDD): DSM-5

Rationale for creation: Address overdiagnosis of pediatric bipolar disorder in the USA. DMDD captures children with severe, chronic irritability who were being misclassified as bipolar.

Criteria:

Key distinction from pediatric bipolar:

Management:


SECTION 9: RATING SCALES QUICK REFERENCE

ScaleTypeItemsRaterKey Details
HAM-D (HDRS)Depression severity17 (original) or 21ClinicianGold standard for research; item 3 = suicide; score: 0-7 normal, 8-16 mild, 17-23 moderate, >24 severe
MADRSDepression severity10ClinicianMore sensitive to change; better for antidepressant trials; less somatic focus than HAM-D
PHQ-9Depression screening + severity9Self-reportMirrors DSM-5 criteria; score: 5-9 mild, 10-14 moderate, 15-19 moderately severe, 20-27 severe
BDI-IIDepression severity21Self-reportCognitive focus; widely used in CBT research
YMRSMania severity11ClinicianYoung Mania Rating Scale; gold standard for manic episodes
EPDSPeripartum depression screening10Self-reportEdinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale; cutoff 10-13
GDSGeriatric depression15 or 30Self-reportGeriatric Depression Scale; yes/no format; avoids somatic items that confound in elderly
C-SSRSSuicide assessmentStructured interviewClinicianColumbia; ideation + behavior subscales
SAD PERSONSSuicide risk10 itemsClinicianScreening mnemonic-based; low predictive value individually

SECTION 10: ECT IN MOOD DISORDERS

Indications in Mood Disorders

  1. Severe depression with psychotic features, response rate >80%
  2. Severe depression with suicidality, fastest acting treatment
  3. Treatment-resistant depression, after failed adequate pharmacotherapy
  4. Catatonia (including depressive catatonia)
  5. Severe mania (refractory to medications, delirious mania)
  6. Bipolar depression, effective, especially with psychotic features
  7. Peripartum depression, when pharmacotherapy risky or ineffective
  8. Nutritional compromise, patient refusing food/fluids due to depression

Key Facts for Exam


Cross-references: NB-06 (Schizophrenia, for overlap on antipsychotics, metabolic syndrome)

Chapter 02

Model Answers


QUESTION 1: "Pharmacological management of Bipolar Disorders." (10 marks / 20 marks LONG ESSAY)

Exam Strategy

10-mark: Introduction (1), acute mania (3), bipolar depression (3), maintenance (2), special populations (1). 20-mark: All of the above expanded + algorithm flowchart + evidence citations + neurobiology of drug action + emerging treatments. Tables are your friend here, examiners can scan them fast. MUST mention lithium's anti-suicidal property, it's a differentiator answer.

Model Answer (10-mark version)

Introduction (1 mark)

Bipolar disorder is a chronic relapsing condition requiring distinct pharmacological strategies for each phase: acute mania, acute bipolar depression, and maintenance/prophylaxis. Treatment goals include symptom remission, functional recovery, and relapse prevention. The pharmacological armamentarium includes mood stabilizers (lithium, valproate, carbamazepine, lamotrigine) and atypical antipsychotics.

Acute Mania Management (3 marks)

SeverityFirst-lineSecond-line
Mild-moderateLithium or valproate monotherapyCarbamazepine, atypical antipsychotic monotherapy
Severe / psychoticAtypical antipsychotic + lithium or valproateECT (if refractory or catatonic)
Acute agitationShort-term benzodiazepines (lorazepam) + antipsychoticIM olanzapine or haloperidol

Bipolar Depression Management (3 marks)

This is the most challenging phase. Cardinal rule: NO antidepressant monotherapy (risk of manic switch and cycle acceleration).

AgentEvidence LevelNotes
Quetiapine (300mg)Strong (BOLDER trials)Only drug with monotherapy evidence for both poles
LithiumModerateAnti-suicidal benefit
LamotrigineModerateBetter for prevention than acute; slow titration
LurasidoneStrong (FDA approved)With or without Li/VPA; take with food
Cariprazine (1.5mg)Emerging (FDA approved)D3-preferring partial agonist
OFC (olanzapine-fluoxetine)StrongMetabolic concerns

If antidepressant added: ALWAYS with mood stabilizer cover; prefer SSRIs or bupropion; short course; avoid TCAs/venlafaxine.

Maintenance Treatment (2 marks)

DrugPrevents ManiaPrevents DepressionSpecial Properties
Lithium+++++Anti-suicidal (unique); gold standard
Valproate++++Preferred in rapid cycling, mixed states
Lamotrigine++++Preferred for depressive-predominant course
Quetiapine++++Adjunctive or monotherapy
Aripiprazole+++Weight-neutral option

Special Populations (1 mark)


Model Answer (20-mark LONG ESSAY expansion: additional sections)

Neurobiology of Drug Action (3 marks)

Treatment Algorithm, Flowchart Format (2 marks)

  1. Confirm diagnosis (rule out medical, substance-induced, unipolar)
  2. Determine phase (mania/mixed depression maintenance)
  3. Phase-specific treatment (as above)
  4. Assess response at 2-4 weeks
  5. Non-response switch within class or add agent
  6. Refractory ECT or clozapine (mania) / esketamine or ECT (depression)

Emerging and Novel Treatments (2 marks)

Evidence Base (2 marks)


QUESTION 2: "Course and outcome of Bipolar Affective Disorder." (10 marks)

Exam Strategy

Kraepelin's observations (1), episode characteristics (2), longitudinal course (3), prognostic factors (2), functional outcomes (1), impact of treatment (1). Use a table for prognostic factors, always impressive.

Model Answer

Historical Context (1 mark)

Kraepelin (1921) first systematically described the longitudinal course of manic-depressive illness, noting increasing episode frequency over time, shortening of inter-episode intervals, and variable inter-episode recovery. His observations laid the groundwork for the kindling model.

Episode Characteristics (2 marks)

Parameter · Data
Average number of lifetime episodes 8-12
Manic episode duration (untreated) 4-6 months
Depressive episode duration 6-12 months
First episode polarity ~50% depressive
Time spent in depression vs mania 3:1 (BP-I), higher in BP-II
Polarity predominance Most patients have a predominant polarity (depressive > manic)

Longitudinal Course (3 marks)

Prognostic Factors (2 marks)

Good Prognosis · Poor Prognosis
Late onset Early onset (<25 years)
Few episodes Multiple episodes (>5)
Classical euphoric mania Mixed features
Good inter-episode functioning Residual symptoms between episodes
Treatment adherence Comorbid substance use (40-60% lifetime)
Good social support Personality disorder comorbidity
Absence of psychotic features Mood-incongruent psychotic features
Male sex (some studies) Rapid cycling

Functional and Psychosocial Outcomes (1 mark)

Impact of Treatment on Course (1 mark)


QUESTION 3: "Classify BPAD and discuss recent advances in treatment." (10 marks / 20 marks LONG ESSAY)

Exam Strategy

Classification (3), recent advances in pharmacotherapy (4), neuromodulation (1), psychotherapy (1), biomarkers/precision medicine (1). For 20-mark: expand each section + add emerging compounds + staging models.

Model Answer (10 marks)

Classification of Bipolar Disorder (3 marks)

ICD-11 Classification:

DSM-5 Classification:

DSM-5 Specifiers: With anxious distress, with mixed features, with rapid cycling, with melancholic features, with atypical features, with mood-congruent/incongruent psychotic features, with catatonia, with peripartum onset, with seasonal pattern.

Key DSM-5 change from DSM-IV: "Mixed episode" replaced by "with mixed features" specifier applicable to any episode.

Recent Advances in Pharmacotherapy (4 marks)

Advance · Detail
Cariprazine D3-preferring partial agonist; FDA approved for bipolar depression (2019), mania, and maintenance; emerging as versatile agent
Lumateperone Novel mechanism (5-HT2A/D2/SERT); Positive phase III trials for bipolar depression as adjunct to Li/VPA
Lurasidone FDA approved for bipolar depression (2013); favorable metabolic profile; take with food (350+ kcal)
Dextromethorphan/bupropion Glutamatergic mechanism; FDA approved for MDD (2022); trials ongoing for bipolar depression
Long-acting injectables Aripiprazole LAI (Abilify Maintena) and risperidone LAI for maintenance; improves adherence
Valproate restriction EMA/MHRA/NICE restrict valproate in women of childbearing age due to teratogenicity and neurodevelopmental effects
Esketamine/ketamine Emerging evidence for acute bipolar depression and suicidality; not yet approved for bipolar specifically
Lithium precision dosing Pharmacogenomic-guided lithium dosing; predicting response based on genetic markers

Advances in Neuromodulation (1 mark)

Advances in Psychotherapy (1 mark)

Advances in Understanding and Biomarkers (1 mark)


QUESTION 4: "Genetics of Bipolar disorders." (10 marks)

Exam Strategy

Heritability data (2), family/twin/adoption studies (3), molecular genetics (3), genetic overlap (1), clinical implications (1).

Model Answer

Heritability (2 marks)

Bipolar disorder is one of the most heritable psychiatric conditions, with estimated heritability of approximately 85% from twin studies. This is higher than most other psychiatric disorders (schizophrenia ~80%, MDD ~40%, anxiety disorders ~30-40%).

Family Studies (1 mark)

Twin Studies (1 mark)

Adoption Studies (1 mark)

Molecular Genetics (3 marks)

Genome-Wide Association Studies (GWAS):

Key genes and pathways:

Gene/LocusFunctionNotes
CACNA1CVoltage-gated calcium channel (L-type)Most replicated; shared with schizophrenia and MDD
ANK3Ankyrin G, axon initial segmentCritical for action potential generation
CLOCK genes (CLOCK, PER3, CRY1)Circadian rhythm regulationLinks to circadian disruption in bipolar
BDNFNeurotrophic factorVal66Met polymorphism; affects neuroplasticity
DISC1Centrosome function, neurodevelopmentShared with schizophrenia
DGKHDiacylglycerol kinaseSecond messenger pathway (lithium target)
NRG1Neuregulin, synaptic functionShared with schizophrenia
ODZ4Cell-cell signalingIdentified in PGC GWAS

Rare variants: Copy number variants (CNVs), duplications at 16p11.2, deletions at 3q29, 15q11.2, overlap with schizophrenia and ASD.

Genetic Overlap with Other Disorders (1 mark)

Clinical Implications (1 mark)


QUESTION 5: "Persistent mood disorders." (10 marks)

Exam Strategy

Classification (2), dysthymia/PDD (3), cyclothymia (3), DMDD (2). Common exam question, comprehensive coverage expected.

Model Answer

Classification (2 marks)

Persistent (chronic) mood disorders are characterized by prolonged, sub-threshold mood disturbance. DSM-5 includes:

  1. Persistent Depressive Disorder (PDD), replaces DSM-IV dysthymic disorder; also incorporates chronic major depression
  2. Cyclothymic Disorder, chronic fluctuation between sub-threshold hypomania and depression
  3. Disruptive Mood Dysregulation Disorder (DMDD), DSM-5 addition; children with chronic severe irritability

ICD-11: Dysthymic disorder (6A72), Cyclothymic disorder (6A62)

Persistent Depressive Disorder / Dysthymia (3 marks)

Criteria: Depressed mood more days than not for >= 2 years (1 year in children/adolescents), plus >= 2 of: appetite changes, sleep changes, low energy, low self-esteem, poor concentration, hopelessness. Never symptom-free for >2 months.

DSM-5 specifiers: With anxious distress, with mixed features, with melancholic features, with atypical features, with mood-congruent/incongruent psychotic features, in partial/full remission, early/late onset, with pure dysthymic syndrome vs with persistent major depressive episode vs with intermittent major depressive episodes.

Epidemiology: Lifetime prevalence 3-6%; F:M = 2:1; onset often insidious in adolescence or early adulthood.

Double depression: PDD + superimposed major depressive episode. Present in ~75% of PDD patients. Worse prognosis than MDE alone, higher relapse rates, poorer treatment response.

Management:

Cyclothymic Disorder (3 marks)

Criteria: >= 2 years (1 year in adolescents) of numerous periods with hypomanic symptoms and depressive symptoms not meeting full criteria for hypomanic or major depressive episode. Never symptom-free for >2 months. No full manic, hypomanic, or major depressive episode during initial 2-year period.

Epidemiology: Lifetime prevalence 0.4-1%; equal sex distribution; onset usually adolescence/early adulthood.

Course: 15-50% progress to BP-I or BP-II. Chronic and fluctuating. Often misdiagnosed as personality disorder (especially borderline, the affective instability overlap).

Relationship to bipolar: Considered part of the bipolar spectrum. Family studies show increased bipolar disorder in relatives. Temperament theories (Akiskal) place cyclothymia on a continuum with bipolar.

Management:

Disruptive Mood Dysregulation Disorder, DMDD (2 marks)

Rationale: Created in DSM-5 to address the overdiagnosis of pediatric bipolar disorder. Captures children with severe chronic irritability who were being misclassified.

Criteria: Severe recurrent temper outbursts >= 3x/week; persistently irritable/angry mood between outbursts (most of day, nearly every day); present >= 12 months (no >= 3-month symptom-free period); in >= 2/3 settings; age 6-18 years, onset before 10 years.

Key distinction: DMDD = chronic non-episodic irritability (baseline state) vs pediatric bipolar = episodic mood changes with discrete episodes.

Prognostic trajectory: Develops into unipolar depression and anxiety disorders in adulthood, NOT bipolar disorder. This distinguishes it fundamentally from true pediatric bipolar.

Management: Parent management training, CBT; stimulants if comorbid ADHD; SSRIs for depression/anxiety component; atypical antipsychotics for severe aggression as last resort.


QUESTION 6: "Recent advances in management of mood disorders." (10 marks)

Exam Strategy

Cover BOTH bipolar and unipolar; pharmacological (4), neuromodulation (2), psychotherapy (1), digital/precision (1), guidelines (1), emerging (1).

Model Answer

Pharmacological Advances (4 marks)

Bipolar disorder:

Unipolar depression:

Neuromodulation Advances (2 marks)

Psychotherapy Advances (1 mark)

Precision Medicine and Biomarkers (1 mark)

Guideline Updates (1 mark)

Emerging Paradigms (1 mark)


QUESTION 7: "Disruptive Mood Dysregulation Disorder." (10 marks)

Exam Strategy

Rationale (2), criteria (3), differential (2), course (1), management (2).

Model Answer

Background and Rationale (2 marks)

DMDD was introduced in DSM-5 (2013) to address the dramatic increase in pediatric bipolar disorder diagnoses in the United States (a 40-fold increase between 1994-2003). Leibenluft et al. at NIMH identified that many children diagnosed with bipolar actually had severe chronic irritability (termed "Severe Mood Dysregulation" in research) rather than episodic mood disturbance. Follow-up studies showed these children developed unipolar depression and anxiety in adulthood, NOT bipolar disorder, confirming they were a distinct clinical entity.

Diagnostic Criteria (3 marks)

  1. Severe recurrent temper outbursts manifested verbally (rage) and/or behaviorally (physical aggression) grossly out of proportion in intensity or duration to the situation
  2. Temper outbursts inconsistent with developmental level
  3. Outbursts occur >= 3 times per week on average
  4. Mood between outbursts is persistently irritable or angry most of the day, nearly every day, and observable by others (parents, teachers, peers)
  5. Criteria present for >= 12 months; no period of >= 3 consecutive months without all symptoms
  6. Present in >= 2 of 3 settings (home, school, peers) and severe in at least one
  7. Age 6-18 years at diagnosis; onset of symptoms before age 10 years
  8. Never a distinct period lasting >1 day meeting full criteria for manic/hypomanic episode
  9. Not better explained by another mental disorder; does not coexist with ODD, intermittent explosive disorder, or bipolar disorder

Differential Diagnosis (2 marks)

Condition · Distinguishing Feature
Bipolar disorder (pediatric) Episodic mood changes with distinct elevated/expansive mood; episodes demarcated from baseline
ODD Less severe; primarily defiant/vindictive; does NOT require persistent irritable mood between outbursts; DMDD takes precedence if both criteria met
Intermittent Explosive Disorder Impulsive outbursts only; does NOT require chronic irritable mood between episodes
ADHD Impulsivity and emotional dysregulation common but not the defining feature; frequently comorbid with DMDD
ASD Meltdowns often sensory/routine disruption; consider broader developmental picture
Conduct Disorder Deliberate, planned antisocial behavior vs reactive outbursts

Course and Prognosis (1 mark)

Management (2 marks)

Psychosocial (first-line):

Pharmacological:


QUESTION 8: "Define TRD. Discuss staging and management." (10 marks / 20 marks LONG ESSAY)

Exam Strategy

Definition + pseudo-resistance (2), staging models (3), management algorithm (4), emerging treatments (1). For 20 marks: expand each step with evidence, add neuromodulation details, precision medicine.

Model Answer

Definition (2 marks)

Treatment-Resistant Depression (TRD) is defined as failure to achieve adequate clinical response (typically <50% improvement in depression rating scale scores) after at least 2 adequate antidepressant trials from different pharmacological classes, each at adequate dose for adequate duration (minimum 6-8 weeks at therapeutic dose with confirmed adherence).

Pseudo-resistance (must exclude before diagnosing TRD):

Staging Models (3 marks)

Thase-Rush Model (most commonly cited):

Stage · Definition
Stage I Failure of >= 1 adequate SSRI trial
Stage II Failure of >= 1 adequate trial from a different class (e.g., SNRI)
Stage III Failure of adequate tricyclic antidepressant trial
Stage IV Failure of adequate MAOI trial
Stage V Failure of bilateral ECT course

Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) Staging Method:

European Staging Model (Souery):

Management Algorithm (4 marks)

Step 1, Optimization (confirm adequacy):

Step 2, Switching:

Step 3, Augmentation:

Step 4, Combination antidepressants:

Step 5, Esketamine:

Step 6, ECT:

Step 7, Experimental/emerging:

Emerging Treatments (1 mark)


QUESTION 9: "Depression in the elderly: clinical features, differential diagnosis, management." (10 marks)

Exam Strategy

Epidemiology/context (1), clinical features (3), differential diagnosis (3), management (3).

Model Answer

Epidemiology and Context (1 mark)

Depression affects 10-15% of community-dwelling elderly and up to 40% of those in institutional care. Late-onset depression (onset >60 years) may represent a distinct clinical entity linked to cerebrovascular disease (vascular depression hypothesis, Alexopoulos, 1997). Depression in elderly is underdiagnosed and undertreated due to diagnostic complexity and attribution of symptoms to "normal aging."

Clinical Features (3 marks)

Differences from younger adults:

FeatureElderly DepressionYounger Adult Depression
Mood complaintMay deny sadness; presents with apathy, withdrawalOvert sadness more common
Somatic symptomsProminent, pain, fatigue, GI complaints, weight lossLess prominent
Cognitive complaintsCommon, "pseudodementia"; memory, concentrationPresent but less prominent
AnxietyVery common (up to 50% comorbidity)Common
Psychotic featuresMore common in elderly depression (hallucinations, delusions of guilt/poverty/nihilism)Less common
Psychomotor changesRetardation often prominentVariable
HypochondriasisCommonLess common
Executive dysfunctionProminent in vascular depressionVariable
Suicidal behaviorHigher completion rate; less warning; more lethal methodsMore attempts, lower completion

Vascular depression features:

Differential Diagnosis (3 marks)

Condition · Key Differentiators
Dementia See pseudodementia vs dementia table; gradual onset, confabulation, temporal gradient, no diurnal variation
Medical illness Hypothyroidism, B12/folate deficiency, Parkinson's, stroke, cancer, chronic pain; always screen medically
Medication-induced Beta-blockers, corticosteroids, interferon, benzodiazepines, anticholinergics; temporal relationship
Bereavement/adjustment Temporal relationship to loss; grief has waves rather than persistent flatness
Apathy syndrome Motivational deficit without sadness or guilt; can be independent of depression
Substance use Alcohol use disorder in elderly often hidden; benzodiazepine dependence
Delirium Acute onset, fluctuating course, altered consciousness; always consider in elderly

Pseudodementia vs dementia, key distinguishing features:

Management (3 marks)

Pharmacological:

Psychotherapy:

Other considerations:


QUESTION 10: "Suicide: risk factors, assessment scales, prevention strategies." (10 marks)

Exam Strategy

Epidemiology (1), risk factors (3), assessment scales (3), prevention (3). Indian data expected, include NCRB, MHCA Section 115.

Model Answer

Epidemiology (1 mark)

Globally: ~800,000 deaths by suicide annually (WHO). India: ~12/100,000 population (NCRB 2021), accounting for ~36% of global female suicides and ~24% of male suicides. Peak age: 18-30 years (younger than Western countries). Suicide decriminalized in India under Mental Healthcare Act 2017, Section 115, attempted suicide presumed to be under severe stress.

Risk Factors (3 marks)

SAD PERSONS mnemonic:

Additional risk factors:

Indian-specific:

Assessment Scales (3 marks)

ScaleTypeKey Features
Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)Clinician-ratedGold standard; rates ideation (5 levels) + behavior (5 levels); FDA endorsed; tracks change over time
SAD PERSONSClinician checklistMnemonic-based; 10 risk factors scored 0 or 1; guides disposition; low individual predictive value
Beck Scale for Suicide Ideation (BSI)Self-report (19 items)Measures intensity, frequency, duration of ideation; good for research
Beck Hopelessness Scale (BHS)Self-report (20 items)Measures hopelessness, more predictive of suicide than depression severity
PHQ-9 Item 9ScreeningSingle item on suicidal thoughts; sensitivity for screening in primary care
MINI Suicidality ModuleClinician-ratedPart of MINI structured interview; quick categorization
Nurses' Global Assessment of Suicide Risk (NGASR)Nursing tool15-item inpatient risk assessment

Clinical assessment framework (beyond scales):

  1. Ideation: passive vs active
  2. Plan: specific method, timeframe
  3. Means: access to intended method
  4. Intent: strength of desire, reasons for living
  5. Preparedness: giving possessions, writing notes
  6. Protective factors: children, religion, social support
  7. Recent changes: sudden calm, recent discharge, recent loss

Prevention Strategies (3 marks)

Universal (population-level):

Selective (targeted to high-risk groups):

Indicated (individual-level):


QUESTION 11: "Newer antidepressants: classification and clinical applications." (10 marks)

Exam Strategy

Define "newer" broadly (2), classify by mechanism (3), clinical applications (3), evidence summary (2).

Model Answer

Introduction (1 mark)

"Newer antidepressants" encompasses agents developed beyond the traditional SSRI/SNRI/TCA/MAOI framework, with novel mechanisms of action. These include multimodal serotonergic agents, glutamate modulators, neurosteroids, and psychedelic-assisted therapies.

Classification by Mechanism (4 marks)

DrugMechanismYear ApprovedPrimary Indication
VortioxetineMultimodal: SERT inhibition + 5-HT1A agonist + 5-HT3/7 antagonist + 5-HT1B partial agonist2013MDD (especially with cognitive symptoms)
AgomelatineMT1/MT2 melatonin agonist + 5-HT2C antagonist2009 (EU)MDD (circadian-related)
Bupropion/dextromethorphan (Auvelity)NMDA antagonist + sigma-1 agonist + NDRI2022MDD
Esketamine (Spravato)NMDA receptor antagonist2019TRD, MDD with suicidal ideation
Brexanolone (Zulresso)GABA-A PAM (allopregnanolone analog)2019Postpartum depression
Zuranolone (Zurzuvae)Oral GABA-A PAM (neuroactive steroid)2023Postpartum depression
CariprazineD3-preferring partial agonist + D2 partial agonist + 5-HT1A partial agonist2019 (bipolar depression)Bipolar depression, schizophrenia
Psilocybin5-HT2A agonist (classical psychedelic)Breakthrough therapy (not yet approved)TRD (investigational)

Clinical Applications (3 marks)

Vortioxetine:

Agomelatine:

Esketamine:

Brexanolone:

Zuranolone:

Bupropion/dextromethorphan:

Evidence Summary and Clinical Decision-Making (2 marks)


QUESTION 12: "Lithium: mechanism of action, monitoring, side effects, toxicity and management." (10 marks)

Exam Strategy

Mechanism (3), monitoring (2), side effects (2), toxicity + management (3). This is a standalone lithium question, go deep, use tables.

Model Answer

Mechanism of Action (3 marks)

Mechanism · Detail
GSK-3beta inhibition Most established mechanism. GSK-3beta regulates apoptosis, glycogen metabolism, circadian rhythms, neurogenesis. Inhibition neuroprotection, circadian stabilization
Inositol depletion Berridge hypothesis: lithium inhibits inositol monophosphatase depletes free inositol reduces phosphoinositide (PI) turnover dampens overactive receptor-mediated signaling. Effect is greatest in most active neurons.
Neuroprotection Increases Bcl-2 (anti-apoptotic protein), increases NAA, increases gray matter volume on MRI. May prevent or slow neurodegeneration.
Glutamate modulation Reduces excitatory glutamatergic transmission; protects against glutamate excitotoxicity
Serotonergic enhancement Increases tryptophan uptake, enhances 5-HT release, modifies 5-HT receptor sensitivity
CREB and BDNF Increases CREB (transcription factor) and BDNF expression enhanced synaptic plasticity
Anti-suicidal effect Specific to lithium; mechanism incompletely understood; may involve serotonergic enhancement + reduced impulsivity/aggression

Monitoring Schedule (2 marks)

TestBaselineRegular MonitoringNotes
Serum lithium levelBefore starting, then 5-7 days after initiation/dose changeEvery 3-6 months (stable), every 1-3 months (unstable)12-hour post-dose trough
Renal function (creatinine, eGFR, urine osmolality)YesEvery 6 monthsMonitor for nephrogenic DI and CKD
Thyroid (TSH +/- free T4)YesEvery 6 monthsHypothyroidism in 20-30%
Calcium + parathyroid hormoneYesEvery 12 months (6 monthly if abnormal)Hyperparathyroidism
ECGYes (>40 years or cardiac history)Annual in elderlyT-wave flattening, sinus node dysfunction
FBCYesAnnual
Weight/BMIYesEvery visitWeight gain common
Pregnancy testYes (women of childbearing age)As neededTeratogenicity
Electrolytes (Na, K)YesWith renal function

Therapeutic ranges:

Side Effects (2 marks)

TimingSide EffectManagement
EarlyFine tremorPropranolol 10-20mg; reduce dose if possible
EarlyGI (nausea, diarrhea)Take with food; switch to slow-release formulation
EarlyPolyuria/polydipsiaNephrogenic DI; amiloride may help; ensure hydration
OngoingWeight gainDiet, exercise counseling
OngoingCognitive dulling ("lithium fog")Dose reduction; assess if depression vs medication effect
OngoingAcne, psoriasis exacerbationDermatological management
Long-termHypothyroidismLevothyroxine supplementation; do NOT stop lithium
Long-termHyperparathyroidismMonitor calcium; endocrine referral if persistent
Long-termChronic kidney diseaseMonitor eGFR; controversial whether lithium directly causes vs risk factor; minimize other nephrotoxins
Long-termCardiac (T-wave changes, sinus node dysfunction)ECG monitoring; usually benign
TeratogenicityEbstein's anomalyRisk ~0.1% (lower than historically thought but 20-40x baseline); level II ultrasound + fetal echocardiography

Toxicity and Management (3 marks)

Clinical features by severity:

Level (mEq/L)SeverityFeatures
1.5-2.0MildCoarse tremor (replacing fine), nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, drowsiness, muscular weakness, fasciculations
2.0-2.5ModerateAtaxia, dysarthria, confusion, myoclonic jerks, hyperreflexia, nystagmus, EEG changes
2.5-3.0SevereSeizures (generalized tonic-clonic), impaired consciousness, coma
>3.0Life-threateningRenal failure, cardiovascular collapse, irreversible cerebellar damage, death

Common precipitants:

Management:

  1. Stop lithium immediately
  2. IV normal saline 0.9%, aggressive rehydration to restore volume and sodium; enhances renal lithium excretion
  3. Serial lithium levels every 2-4 hours until consistently declining
  4. Monitor: renal function, electrolytes, ECG, neurological status
  5. Correct precipitating cause (stop offending drugs, treat infection/dehydration)
  6. Avoid further nephrotoxins
  7. Hemodialysis, indications:
  8. Serum lithium >4.0 mEq/L (regardless of symptoms)
  9. Serum lithium >2.5 mEq/L with severe symptoms
  10. Renal failure (impaired excretion)
  11. Deterioration despite supportive care
  12. Post-dialysis: monitor for rebound (lithium redistributes from tissue compartments; may need repeat dialysis)
  13. Whole bowel irrigation if recent ingestion of sustained-release formulation (activated charcoal does NOT bind lithium)
  14. Benzodiazepines for seizures
  15. ICU admission for severe toxicity

QUESTION 13: "Describe negative symptoms in schizophrenia and discuss management." (10 marks)

Exam Strategy

Cross-reference NB-06 (Schizophrenia). If this appears in Paper II as a mood disorder overlap, focus on the mood disorder intersection. This overlaps with depression (avolition, anhedonia, flat affect), differential between negative symptoms and depression is important. See NB-06-P2-Schizophrenia files for full model answer.

Brief note for mood disorder context:

Negative symptoms (avolition, anhedonia, flat affect, alogia, asociality) overlap significantly with depressive features. In schizoaffective disorder, distinguishing "primary" negative symptoms from depressive episodes is critical for treatment planning. If depression is contributing: treat depression aggressively (antidepressants with mood stabilizer cover). If primary negative symptoms: cariprazine (D3 partial agonism), amisulpride (low dose), consider psychosocial interventions.


QUESTION 14: "What is metabolic syndrome and its relationship with psychotropic medications?" (10 marks)

Exam Strategy

Definition/criteria (2), pathophysiology (1), psychotropics involved (4), monitoring (2), management (1).

Model Answer

Definition and Criteria (2 marks)

Metabolic syndrome is a cluster of interconnected metabolic abnormalities that increase cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes risk. Defined by NCEP ATP-III criteria (3 of 5):

Component · Threshold
Waist circumference >102 cm (M) / >88 cm (F); modified for Asian: >90 cm (M) / >80 cm (F)
Triglycerides >= 150 mg/dL
HDL cholesterol <40 mg/dL (M) / <50 mg/dL (F)
Blood pressure >= 130/85 mmHg or on treatment
Fasting glucose >= 100 mg/dL or on treatment

Prevalence in psychiatric populations: 2-3x general population (30-50% in schizophrenia/bipolar).

Pathophysiology (1 mark)

Psychotropic Medications and Metabolic Risk (4 marks)

DrugWeight GainDiabetes RiskDyslipidemiaRanking
Clozapine++++++++++++Highest risk
Olanzapine++++++++++Very high risk
Quetiapine++++++Moderate-high
Risperidone++++Moderate
Paliperidone++++Moderate
Aripiprazole+/-+/-+/-Low
Ziprasidone+/-+/-+/-Low
Lurasidone+/-+/-+/-Low
Cariprazine+/-+/-+/-Low

Mood stabilizers:

Antidepressants:

Monitoring (2 marks)

Per ADA/APA consensus guidelines (2004, updated):

ParameterBaseline4 weeks8 weeks12 weeksQuarterlyAnnually5-yearly
Weight/BMIYesYesYesYesYes
Waist circumferenceYesYesYes
Blood pressureYesYesYes
Fasting glucoseYesYesYes
Fasting lipid profileYesYesYes
Personal/family historyYesYes

Management (1 mark)


QUESTION 15: "Discuss the role of ECT in treatment of mood disorders." (10 marks)

Exam Strategy

Indications (3), mechanism (1), procedure highlights (2), evidence (2), side effects (1), special populations (1).

Model Answer

Indications in Mood Disorders (3 marks)

Depression:

  1. Severe depression with psychotic features, response rate >80% (superior to pharmacotherapy alone)
  2. Severe depression with acute suicidality, fastest acting antidepressant treatment
  3. Treatment-resistant depression (Thase-Rush Stage V)
  4. Catatonic depression
  5. Depression with nutritional compromise (refusing food/fluids)
  6. Depression in pregnancy, when pharmacotherapy is ineffective or poses unacceptable risk
  7. Depression in elderly, safe, effective, sometimes preferred over polypharmacy

Bipolar disorder:

  1. Acute mania (refractory to medications, delirious mania, catatonic features)
  2. Bipolar depression (severe, psychotic, or refractory)
  3. Mixed states with severe features
  4. Rapid cycling (as adjunct to mood stabilizers)

Mechanism (1 mark)

The precise mechanism remains incompletely understood. Leading theories:

Procedure Key Points (2 marks)

Evidence Base (2 marks)

Side Effects (1 mark)

Special Populations (1 mark)


Chapter 03

Mnemonics & Memory Tricks


MNEMONIC 1: DIGFAST: Symptoms of Mania

DIGFAST

Mnemonic
DIGFAST

EXAM PEARL: Symptoms of a manic episode, need >= 3 (or 4 if mood is only irritable, not elevated/expansive).

LetterSymptomAnchor
DDistractibilityCan't hold attention, drawn to every irrelevant stimulus
IIndiscretion / ImpulsivitySpending sprees, sexual indiscretions, reckless investments
GGrandiosity"I am God" / "I will solve world hunger", inflated self-esteem
FFlight of ideasRacing thoughts, jumping topics, clang associations
AActivity increaseGoal-directed hyperactivity, psychomotor agitation
SSleep decreasedFeels rested after 2-3 hours, NOT insomnia (patient doesn't WANT more sleep)
TTalkativenessPressured speech, loud, hard to interrupt
Exam Pearl

Need >= 3 of DIGFAST (or 4 if mood is only irritable, not elevated/expansive) for manic episode diagnosis.


MNEMONIC 2: SIG E CAPS: Depression (DSM-5 Criteria)

SIG E CAPS

Mnemonic
SIG E CAPS

EXAM PEARL: Think of it as a doctor writing a prescription (Sig: E Caps), "Prescribe Energy Capsules"

LetterSymptomDetail
SSleepInsomnia (especially early morning awakening) or hypersomnia
IInterestLoss of interest or pleasure in activities (anhedonia)
GGuiltExcessive or inappropriate guilt; worthlessness
EEnergyFatigue, loss of energy
CConcentrationDecreased concentration, indecisiveness
AAppetiteDecreased or increased; weight change (>5% in one month)
PPsychomotorAgitation or retardation (observable by others)
SSuicidal ideationThoughts of death, suicidal ideation, plan, attempt

Plus depressed mood (most of day, nearly every day)

Exam Pearl

>= 5 of 9 for >= 2 weeks. MUST include either depressed mood OR anhedonia.


MNEMONIC 3: Bipolar I vs II vs Cyclothymia: "The 1-2-C Rule"

The 1-2-C Rule

Mnemonic
The 1-2-C Rule

EXAM PEARL: Bipolar I = 1 manic episode is enough; Bipolar II = 2 types needed; Cyclothymia = Chronic sub-threshold.

Bipolar I = 1 manic episode is enough (depression not required for diagnosis)

Bipolar II = 2 types needed (hypomania + depression BOTH required)

Cyclothymia = Chronic but sub-threshold (never meets full criteria for either pole)

Memory trick: "One episode of mania = BP-I, Two poles required = BP-II, Chronically cycling below threshold = Cyclothymia"


MNEMONIC 4: Lithium Side Effects: "LITHIUM"

LITHIUM

Mnemonic
LITHIUM

EXAM PEARL: Each letter of the drug name maps to a key side effect.

LetterSide EffectDetail
LLeukocytosisBenign; can mask infection
IInsipidus (diabetes)Nephrogenic DI; polyuria/polydipsia; impaired aquaporin-2
TTremorFine tremor (therapeutic); coarse tremor = toxicity
HHypothyroidism20-30%; more in women; treat with levothyroxine, continue lithium
IIncreased weightCommon; diet counseling
UUpset stomachNausea, diarrhea; take with food
MMorphological (cardiac)Ebstein's anomaly (teratogen); T-wave changes on ECG
Exam Pearl

"Lithium loves the thyroid and kidneys, it won't leave them alone" (hypothyroidism, nephrogenic DI, chronic kidney disease, hyperparathyroidism)


MNEMONIC 5: Lithium Monitoring: "RENAL ThyCa" (Renal, Thyroid, Calcium)

RENAL ThyCa

Mnemonic
RENAL ThyCa

EXAM PEARL: Baseline investigations before starting lithium.

Baseline before starting lithium:

Every 6 months (stable patient):

After every dose change: Recheck lithium level 5-7 days later


MNEMONIC 6: Lithium Toxicity Features: "TOXIC SALT"

TOXIC SALT

Mnemonic
TOXIC SALT

EXAM PEARL: Arranged by severity (mild moderate severe).

LetterFeatureSeverity
TTremor (COARSE, replacing fine)Mild (1.5-2.0)
OOutput increased (vomiting, diarrhea)Mild
XeXhaustion (drowsiness, muscular weakness)Mild
IIncoordination (ataxia)Moderate (2.0-2.5)
CConfusion, dysarthriaModerate
SSeizuresSevere (>2.5)
AArrhythmias, cardiovascular collapseSevere
LLoss of consciousness (coma)Severe
TTerminal renal failureSevere
Exam Pearl

Precipitants, "DNS" (Dehydration, NSAIDs, Sodium depletion/diuretics)


MNEMONIC 7: Valproate Side Effects: "VALPROATE"

VALPROATE

Mnemonic
VALPROATE

EXAM PEARL: Each letter of the drug name maps to a key side effect.

Letter · Side Effect
V Vomiting/GI upset
A Alopecia (hair loss, usually reversible)
L Liver toxicity (hepatotoxicity, monitor LFTs; highest risk: children <2 on polytherapy)
P Pancreatitis (rare but potentially fatal)
R Reproductive (PCOS, menstrual irregularities, teratogenicity, NTDs)
O Obesity (weight gain)
A Ammonia elevated (hyperammonemia, can cause confusion even without liver failure)
T Thrombocytopenia (dose-related)
E Ebstein's? No, that's lithium! Neural tube defects + decreased IQ + autism risk
Exam Pearl

Valproate is effectively CONTRAINDICATED in women of childbearing age (EMA 2018, MHRA, NICE)


MNEMONIC 8: TRD Staging (Thase-Rush): "S-S-T-M-E"

S-S-T-M-E

Mnemonic
Some Students Try Making Electricity

EXAM PEARL: Five stages of treatment-resistant depression.

StageFailed TreatmentMemory Aid
ISSRI"Start with SSRI"
IISwitch to different class (SNRI, etc.)"Switch classes"
IIITCA (tricyclic)"Try Tricyclics"
IVMAOI"MAOI Maneuver"
VECT (bilateral)"ECT, End of the line"

MNEMONIC 9: Antidepressant Classes: "SSN-TMA"

SSN-TMA

Mnemonic
SSN-TMA

EXAM PEARL: Quick reference for antidepressant class recall.

AbbreviationClassExamples
SSSSRIsFluoxetine, Sertraline, Paroxetine, Escitalopram, Fluvoxamine, Citalopram
NSNRIsVenlafaxine, Duloxetine, Desvenlafaxine, Milnacipran
TTCAsAmitriptyline, Imipramine, Clomipramine, Nortriptyline, Desipramine
MMAOIsPhenelzine, Tranylcypromine, Moclobemide, Selegiline
AAtypicals/OthersMirtazapine (NaSSA), Bupropion (NDRI), Vortioxetine, Agomelatine, Trazodone (SARI)
Exam Pearl

SSRIs order by selectivity: "Escitalopram is the most selective; Paroxetine is the most problematic (anticholinergic, worst discontinuation, teratogenic)"

SSRI memory for unique features, "FSPFEC":


MNEMONIC 10: SAD PERSONS: Suicide Risk Factors

SAD PERSONS

Mnemonic
SAD PERSONS

EXAM PEARL: Ten risk factors for suicide, guides risk stratification and disposition.

LetterFactorHigh-Risk Qualifier
SSexMale (completed); Female (attempted)
AAge>65 or 15-30
DDepressionAny psychiatric illness, especially mood disorders
PPrevious attemptStrongest single predictor
EEthanol/drugsActive use; intoxication at time
RRational thinking lossPsychosis, command hallucinations
SSocial supports lackingIsolation, unemployment
OOrganized planSpecific, lethal, access to means
NNo spouseSingle, divorced, widowed
SSicknessChronic pain, terminal illness

Scoring: 0-2 = outpatient, 3-4 = close follow-up, 5-6 = consider hospitalization, 7-10 = hospitalize

Exam Pearl

SAD PERSONS has poor predictive validity individually but is a useful clinical framework. Emphasize that "previous attempt" is the strongest predictor, and "hopelessness" (not in the mnemonic) is more predictive than depression severity.


MNEMONIC 11: Serotonin Syndrome: "HAM" Triad

HAM Triad

Mnemonic
HAM

EXAM PEARL: Three-system triad of serotonin syndrome.

Triad Component · Features
H, Hyperactivity (neuromuscular) Myoclonus, hyperreflexia, clonus (especially lower limbs), tremor, rigidity
A, Autonomic instability Hyperthermia, tachycardia, diaphoresis, hypertension, diarrhea, mydriasis
M, Mental status changes Agitation, confusion, delirium
Exam Pearl

Distinguishing feature from NMS: Serotonin syndrome = CLONUS + hyperreflexia (fast onset, hours). NMS = lead-pipe RIGIDITY + bradyreflexia (slow onset, days-weeks).

Clinical Anchor

Treatment: "Stop the serotonin, Cool the patient, Cyproheptadine"


MNEMONIC 12: SSRI Side Effects: "SING SAD"

SING SAD

Mnemonic
SING SAD

EXAM PEARL: Common SSRI side effects.

Letter · Side Effect
S Sexual dysfunction (30-40%, most common reason for discontinuation)
I Insomnia (or sedation depending on agent)
N Nausea (GI, most common early side effect)
G GI disturbance (diarrhea)
S SIADH/hyponatremia (especially elderly)
A Activation/anxiety (initial worsening, first 1-2 weeks)
D Discontinuation syndrome (paroxetine, venlafaxine worst; "FINISH" = Flu-like, Insomnia, Nausea, Imbalance, Sensory disturbance [electric shocks], Hyperarousal)

MNEMONIC 13: Switching vs Augmentation Decision: "No Response = Switch; Partial Response = Augment"

Switch vs Augment

Mnemonic
No Response = Switch; Partial Response = Augment

EXAM PEARL: Decision rule for TRD management.

ScenarioStrategyWhy
NO response after adequate trialSWITCH to different classCurrent mechanism isn't working at all
PARTIAL responseAUGMENT (add second agent)Current mechanism partially working; build on it
Exam Pearl

Top augmentation agents, "LAT" (Lithium, Atypicals, Thyroid): - Lithium: Most evidence-based; 0.6-0.8 mEq/L - Atypical antipsychotics: Aripiprazole (2-5mg), quetiapine (50-300mg) - Thyroid: T3 (liothyronine) 25-50mcg even in euthyroid patients

Top combination strategies, "California Rocket Fuel":


MNEMONIC 14: Lamotrigine Titration: "Slow and Low Saves Skin"

Slow and Low Saves Skin

Mnemonic
Slow and Low Saves Skin

EXAM PEARL: Rapid titration = Stevens-Johnson Syndrome risk.

Standard titration (NO valproate):

With VALPROATE (doubles lamotrigine levels):

With CARBAMAZEPINE (halves lamotrigine levels):

Exam Pearl

ANY rash during titration = STOP immediately and evaluate. Better to restart from scratch than risk SJS.


MNEMONIC 15: Good vs Poor Prognosis in BPAD: "LATE GOOD vs EARLY BAD"

LATE GOOD vs EARLY BAD

Mnemonic
LATE GOOD vs EARLY BAD

EXAM PEARL: Prognostic factors in bipolar affective disorder.

Good prognosis, "LATE GOOD":

Poor prognosis, "EARLY BAD":


MNEMONIC 16: Bipolar Depression: "NO Antidepressant Monotherapy!" (NOAM)

NOAM

Mnemonic
NOAM, NO Antidepressant Monotherapy

EXAM PEARL: First-line treatment options for bipolar depression.

What TO use, "QLLOC":

What NOT to do:


MNEMONIC 17: Depression Rating Scales: "How Many Patients Burned out?"

How Many Patients Burned out?

Mnemonic
How Many Patients Burned out?

EXAM PEARL: H=HAM-D, M=MADRS, P=PHQ-9, B=BDI-II.

InitialScaleRemember
HHAM-DHamilton = clinician-rated, 17 items, gold standard research
MMADRSMontgomery-Asberg = clinician-rated, 10 items, sensitive to change
PPHQ-9Patient Health Questionnaire = self-report, 9 items, mirrors DSM-5
BBDI-IIBeck Depression Inventory = self-report, 21 items, cognitive focus
Exam Pearl

Clinician-rated = H and M (Hamilton, MADRS); Self-report = P and B (PHQ-9, BDI)


MNEMONIC 18: Mania vs Hypomania: "Duration, Destruction, Delusions"

Duration, Destruction, Delusions

Mnemonic
Duration, Destruction, Delusions

EXAM PEARL: Three Ds that distinguish mania from hypomania.

FeatureHypomaniaMania
Duration>= 4 days>= 7 days (or any if hospitalized)
Destruction (functional impairment)NOT markedMARKED
Delusions (psychotic features)NEVERCan occur
Exam Pearl

"If there are any D's that are BIG, it's mania, not hypomania."


MNEMONIC 19: Drugs That Precipitate Lithium Toxicity: "DNATA"

DNATA

Mnemonic
DNATA

EXAM PEARL: Drug and non-drug causes that raise lithium levels to toxic range.

Letter · Drug/Cause
D Dehydration (any cause, fever, vomiting, diarrhea, hot weather)
N NSAIDs (ibuprofen, naproxen, reduce renal lithium clearance)
A ACE inhibitors / ARBs
T Thiazide diuretics (NOT loop diuretics, loop are safer)
A Any sodium depletion (low-salt diet, excessive sweating)
Exam Pearl

"DNATA causes lithium to rise", Lithium is handled like sodium by the kidney. Anything that depletes sodium or reduces GFR raises lithium levels.


MNEMONIC 20: Discontinuation Syndrome Features: "FINISH"

FINISH

Mnemonic
FINISH

EXAM PEARL: Six features of antidepressant discontinuation syndrome.

Letter · Symptom
F Flu-like symptoms
I Insomnia
N Nausea
I Imbalance (dizziness, vertigo)
S Sensory disturbances (electric shock sensations, "brain zaps")
H Hyperarousal (anxiety, agitation, irritability)
Exam Pearl

Worst offenders: Paroxetine and venlafaxine (short half-lives). Never happens with: Fluoxetine (long half-life = self-tapering). Prevention: Gradual taper over 2-4 weeks minimum.


Chapter 04

High-Yield Comparisons


TABLE 1: Bipolar I vs Bipolar II vs Cyclothymia

FeatureBipolar IBipolar IICyclothymia
Defining episodeAt least 1 manic episodeAt least 1 hypomanic + 1 major depressiveChronic sub-threshold fluctuation both poles
ManiaYes (>= 7 days or hospitalization)NeverNever
HypomaniaMay occurYes (>= 4 days)Sub-threshold hypomanic symptoms
Major depressionCommon but NOT required for diagnosisRequired (at least 1 episode)Never meets full MDE criteria
Duration requirementMania >= 7 daysHypomania >= 4 days + MDE >= 2 weeks>= 2 years (1 year in adolescents)
Psychotic featuresCan occur (mania or depression)Only in depression; if in "hypomania" reclassify to BP-INever
Functional impairmentMarked during maniaHypomania: NOT marked; Depression: significantMild but chronic
HospitalizationCommon during maniaRare for hypomaniaVery rare
Prevalence1-1.5%0.4-1.1%0.4-1%
Sex ratioM = FF > MM = F
Suicide risk10-15% lifetimeComparable to BP-ILower but elevated vs general population
CourseEpisodic; depression predominates 3:1Depression predominates even moreChronic fluctuating; 15-50% convert to BP-I or II
TreatmentMood stabilizers + antipsychoticsMood stabilizers; lamotrigine for depression preventionMood stabilizers if impaired; avoid antidepressant monotherapy

TABLE 2: Mania vs Hypomania

FeatureManiaHypomania
Duration>= 7 days (or any duration if hospitalized)>= 4 consecutive days
Symptom threshold>= 3 DIGFAST (4 if only irritable)Same symptom criteria
Functional impairmentMarked impairment OR hospitalizationChange in functioning observable by others, NOT marked impairment
Psychotic featuresCAN be presentNEVER present (if present mania BP-I)
InsightOften completely lostPartially preserved
Need for hospitalizationFrequently requiredNot required
Subjective experienceMay feel invincible; sometimes dysphoricOften ego-syntonic ("best I've ever felt"); may be productive
Danger to self/othersSignificant risk (reckless behavior, aggression)Mild risk; less dangerous behavior
Impact on diagnosisDefines BP-I (one episode sufficient)Defines BP-II (only with MDE)
Observable by othersClearly abnormal to anyoneRepresents clear change from baseline; others notice
Response to treatmentRequires acute pharmacotherapy (mood stabilizers + antipsychotics)May not need acute treatment; prophylaxis focus
Exam Pearl

The distinction is primarily one of SEVERITY and CONSEQUENCES. Same symptoms, different magnitude. When in doubt, assess functional impact and ask collateral sources.


TABLE 3: Unipolar Depression vs Bipolar Depression: Clinical Clues

FeatureUnipolar DepressionBipolar Depression
Age of onset25-35 years (average)Earlier: 15-25 years
Family historyDepression in familyBipolar disorder in family
Episode characteristicsVariable; insomnia commonHypersomnia, hyperphagia, leaden paralysis (atypical features more common)
PsychomotorAgitation or retardationRetardation more prominent
Episode duration6-12 monthsOften shorter (3-6 months)
Number of episodesFewer lifetime episodesMore frequent episodes
First episode ageLaterOften <25 years
Postpartum onsetLess common associationStrong association with bipolar
Psychotic featuresLess commonMore common (especially mood-congruent)
Antidepressant responseGood response to monotherapyMay switch to mania; rapid cycling; poor sustained response
Treatment-resistanceLess likely to be TRDMore likely (may be unrecognized bipolar)
Mood labilityLessMore (mood swings within episode)
Substance useComorbid but less stronglyStrongly associated
Suicidal behaviorElevatedMORE elevated than unipolar
Response to mood stabilizersLimitedGood (lithium, lamotrigine)
Antidepressant monotherapyFirst-line treatmentCONTRAINDICATED without mood stabilizer cover
Clinical Anchor

Any patient presenting with "TRD" should be carefully screened for bipolarity (MDQ, HCL-32, or clinical interview for past hypomania). Unrecognized bipolar depression is the most common reason for apparent treatment resistance.


TABLE 4: Lithium vs Valproate vs Carbamazepine vs Lamotrigine

FeatureLithiumValproateCarbamazepineLamotrigine
Primary mechanismGSK-3beta inhibition, inositol depletionGABA enhancement, Na channel blockNa channel blockadeGlutamate modulation via Na channels
Acute mania++++++++NOT effective
Bipolar depression++++++ (better for prevention)
Maintenance (mania prevention)+++++++++
Maintenance (depression prevention)+++++++
Anti-suicidal effectYES (unique)NoNoNo
Therapeutic level0.6-1.2 mEq/L50-125 mcg/mL4-12 mcg/mLNot level-monitored
Renal effectsNephrogenic DI, CKDNone significantNone significantNone significant
Thyroid effectsHypothyroidism (20-30%)NoneNoneNone
Hepatic effectsNoneHepatotoxicityHepatotoxicityRare
HematologicLeukocytosis (benign)ThrombocytopeniaAgranulocytosis (rare)None
TeratogenicityEbstein's anomaly (~0.1%)NTDs (1-2%), decreased IQ, autism, WORST teratogenNTDs (less than valproate)Relatively safest; possible cleft palate (low risk)
Weight gainModerateSignificantMildNone (weight-neutral)
Cognitive effectsDulling ("lithium fog")MildMildNone
SkinAcne, psoriasisHair loss (reversible)SJS/TEN (HLA-B*1502)SJS/TEN (slow titration critical)
Drug interactionsNSAIDs, ACEi, thiazidesEnzyme inhibitorPotent enzyme inducer + autoinductionLevels doubled by valproate, halved by CBZ
Women of childbearing ageCaution (Ebstein's); usable with precautionsCONTRAINDICATED (recent guidelines)Caution (teratogenic)Preferred option
Rapid cyclingLess effectiveOften preferredLimited dataMay help
Mixed statesLess effectiveOften preferredLimited dataLimited data
Overdose lethalitySignificant (toxicity protocol)ModerateModerateLow
Best forClassic euphoric mania, maintenance, anti-suicideAcute mania, mixed episodes, rapid cyclingCarbamazepine-responsive patients, maniaBipolar depression prevention

TABLE 5: SSRIs vs SNRIs vs TCAs vs MAOIs

FeatureSSRIsSNRIsTCAsMAOIs
MechanismBlock SERT (serotonin reuptake)Block SERT + NET (serotonin + norepinephrine)Block SERT + NET + anticholinergic + antihistamine + alpha-1Inhibit monoamine oxidase (MAO-A and/or MAO-B)
Efficacy (mild-moderate)First-lineFirst-lineEffective but not first-lineEffective but not first-line
Efficacy (severe/melancholic)GoodGood-very goodVery good (gold standard historically)Very good
Efficacy (atypical depression)GoodGoodPoorBest (gold standard)
Sexual dysfunction30-40% (common)30-40% (common)CommonLess than SSRIs
Weight gainVariable; long-term possibleVariableSignificantSignificant
SedationLow (except paroxetine)LowHigh (H1 blockade)Variable
AnticholinergicMinimalMinimalSignificant (dry mouth, constipation, urinary retention, blurred vision)Low
Cardiac safetyGood (except citalopram QTc)Good (monitor BP with venlafaxine)POOR (QTc prolongation, lethal in overdose)Good
Overdose safetySafeRelatively safe (venlafaxine less so)LETHAL (cardiac arrhythmias)LETHAL (hypertensive crisis)
Drug interactionsCYP450 (fluoxetine, paroxetine = 2D6 inhibitors)Fewer than SSRIsMultiple (CYP, anticholinergic summation)SEROTONIN SYNDROME with serotonergics; TYRAMINE reaction with fermented foods
Dietary restrictionsNoneNoneNoneYES (tyramine-free diet required for irreversible MAOIs)
Discontinuation syndromeModerate (worst: paroxetine)Severe (worst: venlafaxine)ModerateModerate
First-line statusYES (most guidelines)YES (equal to SSRIs in most guidelines)NO (second/third-line due to side effects and overdose risk)NO (third/fourth-line due to dietary restrictions and interactions)
Special indicationsDepression, anxiety disorders, OCDDepression + pain (duloxetine), GADPain syndromes, enuresis (imipramine), OCD (clomipramine)Atypical depression, TRD
Key examplesFluoxetine, sertraline, escitalopram, paroxetineVenlafaxine, duloxetine, desvenlafaxineAmitriptyline, imipramine, clomipramine, nortriptylinePhenelzine, tranylcypromine, moclobemide

TABLE 6: TRD Staging: Thase-Rush and MGH Models

Thase-Rush Model

StageDefinitionClinical Meaning
Stage IFailed >= 1 adequate SSRI trialFirst-level resistance
Stage IIStage I + failed >= 1 trial from a different class (SNRI, bupropion)Cross-class resistance
Stage IIIStage II + failed adequate TCA trialModerate resistance
Stage IVStage III + failed adequate MAOI trialHigh resistance
Stage VStage IV + failed bilateral ECT courseMaximal resistance

MGH Staging Method

Component · Points
Each failed adequate antidepressant trial 1 point
Optimization of dose/duration within a trial 0.5 points
Each augmentation strategy tried 0.5 points
Each combination strategy tried 0.5 points
Failed ECT course 3 points
Total score Sum = overall TRD burden

Comparison

FeatureThase-RushMGH
TypeCategorical (stages)Quantitative (continuous score)
GranularityLow (5 stages)High (decimal scoring)
Includes augmentation/optimizationNoYes
Research utilityModerateHigh (better for comparing across studies)
Clinical utilityGood (intuitive)Good (more precise)
LimitationImplies fixed treatment order (SSRI TCA MAOI) which doesn't reflect modern practiceMore complex to calculate

TABLE 7: Pseudodementia vs Dementia

FeaturePseudodementia (Depression)Dementia
OnsetRelatively rapid, dateableInsidious, gradual
Duration before seeking helpShort (weeks to months)Long (months to years)
Who complainsPATIENT emphasizes cognitive deficitsFAMILY notices; patient minimizes or is unaware
Effort on cognitive testing"Don't know" answers; gives up easily; poor effortTries hard; near-miss answers; confabulates
MoodPervasively depressed; guilt, hopelessnessMay be apathetic or labile; not pervasively sad
Diurnal variationPresent (worse in morning)Sundowning (worse in evening)
Sleep patternEarly morning awakeningFragmented; reversed sleep-wake cycle
Memory patternInconsistent; recent = remoteTemporal gradient (recent >> remote)
Attention/concentrationOften intact but "can't be bothered"Genuinely impaired
OrientationUsually preservedImpaired (especially time place person)
LanguageNormal (may be slow)Anomia, word-finding difficulty, paraphasias
Psychiatric historyOften present (prior depression)Usually absent
Vegetative symptomsProminent (appetite, sleep, energy, libido)Less prominent
Response to antidepressantsYES, cognition improvesNO
NeuroimagingNormal or white matter hyperintensitiesCortical atrophy (especially hippocampal); specific patterns per dementia type
ProgressionDoes NOT progress to worsening dementia acutely; BUT 30-50% develop true dementia within 5 yearsProgressive decline

TABLE 8: Normal Grief vs Major Depression vs Prolonged Grief Disorder

FeatureNormal GriefMajor DepressionProlonged Grief Disorder (ICD-11)
TriggerIdentifiable loss (bereavement)May or may not have clear triggerBereavement (death of close person)
DurationWeeks to months; gradually improves>= 2 weeks (DSM-5 criterion)>= 6 months (ICD-11); >= 12 months (DSM-5-TR)
Core emotional experienceYearning, longing, sadness in waves; triggered by reminders of deceasedPervasive depressed mood, anhedonia; persistent, not in wavesIntense longing/yearning for the deceased; persistent preoccupation with the deceased
Self-esteemPreservedWorthlessness, excessive guiltPreserved (guilt related to the death if present, not global worthlessness)
Positive emotionsCAN experience joy/humor (in between grief waves)Pervasive inability to experience pleasureEmotional numbness; difficulty experiencing positive emotions
Suicidal ideationRare; if present, typically "wish to join deceased"Common; active suicidal ideation/plansMay occur (wanting to die to join deceased)
Functional impairmentTemporary; gradually improvesSustained; does not spontaneously improveSustained; centered on inability to move forward
Identity disruptionMay question identity brieflyPersistent feelings of worthlessnessDifficulty reintegrating identity without the deceased
AvoidanceMinimalSocial withdrawal (general)Specific avoidance of reminders of the death or the loss
CourseGradually improving; adapts to lossPersistent without treatmentPersistent WITHOUT the gradual adaptation seen in normal grief
TreatmentSupport, psychoeducation; usually self-resolvingAntidepressants, psychotherapyComplicated grief therapy (Shear); limited evidence for antidepressants alone
Exam Pearl

The "bereavement exclusion" was removed in DSM-5. MDD can be diagnosed during bereavement if full criteria met. Prolonged Grief Disorder was added in DSM-5-TR (2022) as a new diagnosis.


TABLE 9: Depression Rating Scales

ScaleHAM-D (HDRS)MADRSPHQ-9BDI-II
Full nameHamilton Depression Rating ScaleMontgomery-Asberg Depression Rating ScalePatient Health Questionnaire-9Beck Depression Inventory-II
RaterClinicianClinicianSelf-reportSelf-report
Items17 (original); 21, 24 versions exist10921
Time to administer15-20 minutes10-15 minutes5 minutes5-10 minutes
Scoring0-52 (17-item)0-600-270-63
Severity cutoffs0-7 normal; 8-16 mild; 17-23 moderate; >=24 severe0-6 normal; 7-19 mild; 20-34 moderate; >=35 severe0-4 none; 5-9 mild; 10-14 moderate; 15-19 mod-severe; 20-27 severe0-13 minimal; 14-19 mild; 20-28 moderate; 29-63 severe
Domain focusSomatic/vegetative symptoms weighted heavilyInner feelings, pessimism, suicidality, more psychologicalMirrors DSM-5 criteria directlyCognitive symptoms of depression
Sensitivity to changeGoodBETTER than HAM-D (designed for this)GoodGood
Research gold standardYES (most widely used in RCTs)Increasingly used; preferred by FDA in some trialsPrimary care screening standardCBT research standard
Suicide assessmentItem 3 (single item)Item 10 (suicidal thoughts)Item 9 ("thoughts of self-harm")Item 9
LimitationsOverweights somatic symptoms; insomnia/anxiety inflate score; inter-rater variabilityRequires trained raterSelf-report bias; doesn't assess psychomotor changeSelf-report bias; cognitive focus may miss somatic depression
Best used forClinical trials; treatment response monitoringClinical trials; sensitive outcome measureScreening in primary care; treatment monitoring; population screeningCBT treatment monitoring; research

Additional scales worth knowing:


TABLE 10: Newer Antidepressants Comparison

FeatureEsketamine (Spravato)Brexanolone (Zulresso)Vortioxetine (Brintellix)Agomelatine (Valdoxan)Cariprazine (Vraylar)
MechanismNMDA receptor antagonist (S-enantiomer of ketamine)GABA-A receptor PAM (allopregnanolone analog)Multimodal: SERT inhibition + 5-HT1A agonist + 5-HT3/7 antagonistMT1/MT2 agonist + 5-HT2C antagonistD3-preferring partial agonist + D2 partial agonist + 5-HT1A partial agonist
Primary indicationTRD; MDD with suicidal ideationPostpartum depressionMDD (especially with cognitive symptoms)MDDBipolar depression; schizophrenia; bipolar I mania
RouteIntranasal (in clinic)IV infusion (60 hours; inpatient)OralOralOral
Onset of actionHours to days (rapid)24-48 hours2-4 weeks (standard)2-4 weeks2-4 weeks
Dosing56-84mg twice weekly weekly biweekly60-hour continuous IV5-20mg once daily25-50mg at bedtime1.5-3mg once daily (bipolar depression)
Key advantageFastest acting; works in TRDFirst drug for PPD; very rapidPro-cognitive effects; less sexual dysfunctionNo sexual dysfunction; no weight gain; circadian rhythmEffective across bipolar phases; weight-neutral
Key disadvantageREMS; dissociation; BP elevation; requires clinic visit; expensiveIV only; 60-hour infusion; REMS; extremely expensiveGI side effects (nausea); expensiveHepatotoxicity risk (monitor LFTs); not available in USAAkathisia; long half-life (active metabolite 2-4 weeks)
Sexual dysfunctionMinimalNone reportedLess than SSRIsNoneMinimal
Weight effectsNeutralNeutralNeutralNeutralNeutral
MonitoringBP during administration; dissociation monitoring for 2 hoursPulse oximetry; sedation monitoringStandardLFTs at baseline, 3, 6, 12, 24 weeksMetabolic parameters (standard antipsychotic monitoring)
REMS programYesYesNoNoNo
Availability in IndiaLimitedNot availableAvailableAvailableAvailable
Year approved2019 (FDA)2019 (FDA)2013 (FDA)2009 (EU; not FDA)2015 (FDA; bipolar depression 2019)

Also notable:


Chapter 05

PYQ Frequency Analysis


Executive Summary

Mood disorders rival schizophrenia as the highest-yield clinical topic with 50+ mentions across 28 sessions. Bipolar disorder and depression together guarantee at least 1-2 questions per exam. The spread is roughly equal between bipolar and depression, with pharmacotherapy dominating.


Topic-Level Frequency

TopicExam MentionsVerdict
Bipolar, pharmacological management8Nearly every exam
Bipolar, course and outcome4Every 6-7 exams
Bipolar, genetics3Every 8-10 exams
Bipolar, classification (recent advances)3Emerging
Depression, TRD4Every 6-7 exams
Depression, elderly3Every 8-10 exams
Depression, biological basis3Every 8-10 exams
Lithium (pharmacology, monitoring, toxicity)6Every 4-5 exams
Antidepressants (classification, newer agents)5Every 5-6 exams
Suicide (assessment, risk factors, prevention)5Every 5-6 exams
Persistent mood disorders (dysthymia, cyclothymia)2Occasional
Recent advances (esketamine, brexanolone, newer agents)3Rising

Must-Prepare PYQ Templates

Exam Strategy

Prioritise these 10 templates, they cover ~90% of mood disorder exam exposure. Prepare a structured answer skeleton for each before the exam.

  1. "Pharmacological management of bipolar disorder.", perennial
  2. "Course and outcome of BPAD.", perennial
  3. "Classify BPAD. Recent advances in treatment.", perennial
  4. "Lithium, mechanism, monitoring, side effects, toxicity.", perennial
  5. "Define TRD. Staging. Management strategies.", perennial
  6. "Depression in the elderly, features, differential, management.", perennial
  7. "Suicide, risk factors, assessment, prevention strategies.", perennial
  8. "Newer antidepressants. Esketamine.", emerging
  9. "Genetics of bipolar disorder.", moderate
  10. "Persistent mood disorders.", occasional

Analysis based on PG exams Dec 2011, Jun 2025 + PG exams 2013-2022.

Chapter 06

Quick Review


Vignette 1: First Episode Mania

Case:

A 22-year-old male engineering student is brought by his parents with a 10-day history of decreased sleep (3-4 hours, feels well-rested), talking excessively about starting multiple business ventures, spending his semester's tuition fees on stock trading, and confrontational behavior with faculty. He has no prior psychiatric history. He believes he has "cracked the code to becoming a billionaire" and is irritable when challenged.

Q1. What is the most likely diagnosis? Justify with diagnostic criteria.

Answer:Bipolar I Disorder, current episode manic, severe, with possible mood-congruent psychotic features (grandiose delusions). Criteria met: (1) Elevated/expansive and irritable mood with increased energy for >7 days; (2) DIGFAST symptoms present, Decreased sleep need (S), Grandiosity (G), Talkativeness/pressured speech (T), Activity increase (A), Indiscretion/reckless spending (I); (3) Marked functional impairment (academic, financial); (4) No substance use indicated. The "cracking the code" belief may represent a grandiose delusion if firmly held despite evidence.

Q2. Outline your initial management plan.

Answer:

  1. Safety assessment: Assess for aggression risk, suicidality, capacity for informed consent
  2. Investigations: CBC, RFT, LFT, TFT (rule out hyperthyroidism), blood glucose, urine drug screen, HIV/VDRL (if indicated), ECG
  3. Acute pharmacotherapy: Atypical antipsychotic (olanzapine 10-15mg or risperidone 2-4mg) for rapid symptom control + mood stabilizer (lithium 600-900mg or valproate 750-1000mg). Short-term benzodiazepine (lorazepam 2-4mg/day) for agitation and insomnia
  4. Inpatient admission given severity and functional impairment
  5. Psychoeducation for family regarding illness, treatment, and prognosis once acute phase stabilizes

Q3. What are the poor prognostic factors in this case?

Answer:Early onset (22 years), potential psychotic features (mood-congruent grandiosity if delusional), first episode already showing significant impairment. However, no substance use and family brought him early (supportive family) are positive. Adherence will be the key modifiable factor, young males are at highest risk for non-adherence once they feel better.


Vignette 2: Bipolar Depression Trap

Case:

A 34-year-old woman presents with persistent low mood, hypersomnia (sleeping 12-14 hours/day), increased appetite with 6 kg weight gain over 2 months, leaden paralysis, and difficulty functioning at work. She has had two prior "depressive episodes" at ages 25 and 29, each treated with SSRIs with initial improvement but subsequent worsening and "irritable episodes." Her mother has bipolar disorder.

Q1. What diagnosis should you strongly consider, and why?

Answer:Bipolar II Disorder, current episode depressive, with atypical features. Red flags for bipolarity: (1) Atypical depression features (hypersomnia, hyperphagia, leaden paralysis); (2) Early onset of depressive episodes (age 25); (3) Family history of bipolar disorder in first-degree relative; (4) Past "irritable episodes" following SSRI treatment, likely unrecognized hypomanic episodes or antidepressant-induced mood destabilization; (5) Recurrent episodes with poor sustained response to SSRIs. Screen formally with MDQ or HCL-32. Take detailed history of past mood elevations, including collateral from family.

Q2. What is the critical treatment error to avoid?

Answer:Antidepressant monotherapy. This patient has likely been repeatedly destabilized by SSRI monotherapy (the "irritable episodes" were probably antidepressant-induced hypomania or mixed features). In bipolar depression, antidepressant monotherapy carries risks of: (1) Manic/hypomanic switch; (2) Mixed state induction; (3) Rapid cycling induction; (4) Cycle acceleration. First-line treatment: quetiapine 300mg, OR lithium, OR lamotrigine, OR lurasidone. If antidepressant is added, it MUST be with mood stabilizer cover, using SSRI or bupropion (not SNRI/TCA), for the shortest effective duration.

Q3. What maintenance strategy would you recommend?

Answer:Lamotrigine (effective for preventing depressive relapses in BP-II, which is the predominant polarity), titrated slowly (25mg weeks 1-2, 50mg weeks 3-4, target 200mg by week 6-7). Alternatively, lithium (also provides anti-suicidal benefit). Quetiapine if used acutely can be continued for maintenance. Long-term psychoeducation and social rhythm therapy (IPSRT) as adjuncts. Monitor for any hypomanic switches. Indefinite maintenance given 3+ episodes.


Vignette 3: Lithium Toxicity

Case:

A 48-year-old man with Bipolar I Disorder on lithium 900mg/day for 3 years (stable, level 0.8 mEq/L last checked 2 months ago) presents with 3 days of vomiting and diarrhea due to gastroenteritis. Today he is drowsy, has a coarse tremor, slurred speech, and unsteady gait. His wife reports increasing confusion over the past 24 hours.

Q1. What is your immediate clinical concern and what investigations would you order?

Answer:Lithium toxicity precipitated by dehydration from gastroenteritis. The clinical features (coarse tremor replacing fine, dysarthria, ataxia, confusion) correspond to moderate toxicity (expected level 2.0-2.5 mEq/L). Investigations: (1) STAT serum lithium level; (2) Serum creatinine and eGFR (assess renal function); (3) Serum electrolytes (Na, K, dehydration-related derangements); (4) CBC; (5) ECG (cardiac effects of toxicity); (6) Blood glucose (exclude hypoglycemia as contributing factor).

Q2. Outline the management of this patient step by step.

Answer:

  1. Stop lithium immediately
  2. IV normal saline 0.9%, aggressive rehydration (200-300 mL/hour initially, titrate to clinical response and urine output); corrects dehydration AND enhances renal lithium excretion
  3. Monitor lithium levels every 2-4 hours until consistently declining
  4. Monitor renal function and electrolytes serially
  5. Neurological monitoring, GCS, reflexes, seizure watch
  6. ECG monitoring, continuous cardiac telemetry
  7. Antiemetics for ongoing vomiting (ondansetron, avoid metoclopramide if possible in psychiatric patients)
  8. Hemodialysis criteria: If lithium level >2.5 mEq/L with these severe symptoms (ataxia, confusion, dysarthria), hemodialysis is indicated. Also indicated if level >4.0 (regardless of symptoms), or if renal failure develops, or if clinical deterioration despite supportive care
  9. Post-dialysis: Monitor for rebound (lithium redistributes from tissue compartments; repeat level 6-8 hours post-dialysis; may need repeat dialysis)
  10. Once recovered: Reintroduce lithium at lower dose after complete recovery; consider whether valproate or alternative mood stabilizer more appropriate given toxicity history. Educate extensively about fluid intake, sick day rules, and drugs to avoid (NSAIDs, dehydration)

Q3. What are the "sick day rules" you would educate this patient about to prevent recurrence?

Answer:(1) If vomiting, diarrhea, or fever develop: maintain fluid intake, drink extra water; (2) If unable to keep fluids down for >24 hours: STOP lithium and seek medical attention; (3) Avoid NSAIDs (ibuprofen, naproxen); use paracetamol for pain/fever; (4) Avoid new medications without checking with prescriber (especially ACE inhibitors, ARBs, thiazides); (5) Avoid excessive sweating without fluid replacement (hot weather, intense exercise); (6) Do not reduce salt intake without medical advice; (7) Carry a lithium alert card; (8) Know early toxicity signs: increased tremor, nausea, diarrhea, drowsiness, stop lithium and contact doctor if these develop.


Vignette 4: Treatment-Resistant Depression Workup

Case:

A 42-year-old school teacher presents with persistent depressive symptoms for 18 months. She has tried escitalopram 20mg for 12 weeks (minimal improvement), then duloxetine 120mg for 10 weeks (slight improvement in energy but mood unchanged). She reports pervasive low mood, anhedonia, insomnia, fatigue, concentration difficulty, and passive suicidal ideation ("I wish I wouldn't wake up"). She is adherent to medications. No substance use.

Q1. Does this patient meet criteria for TRD? Stage the resistance.

Answer:Yes, this meets TRD criteria: failure of 2 adequate antidepressant trials from different classes (SSRI: escitalopram 20mg x 12 weeks; SNRI: duloxetine 120mg x 10 weeks) at adequate doses for adequate duration with confirmed adherence. Thase-Rush staging: Stage II (failed SSRI + failed different class). MGH score: 2 points (2 failed adequate trials). Before confirming TRD, rule out pseudo-resistance: (1) Confirm adherence (serum levels if available); (2) Screen for bipolarity (MDQ, clinical history); (3) Screen for comorbidities (thyroid, B12, anemia, diabetes, chronic pain, substance use, sleep apnea); (4) Assess personality pathology; (5) Assess psychosocial stressors.

Q2. Outline the next steps in her management algorithm.

Answer:Given PARTIAL response to duloxetine (slight energy improvement):

  1. Augmentation preferred (partial response = augment; no response = switch)
  2. First-line augmentation: Lithium (0.6-0.8 mEq/L, response expected 2-4 weeks) OR atypical antipsychotic (aripiprazole 2-5mg is best-tolerated; alternatives: quetiapine 50-150mg, brexpiprazole 1-2mg)
  3. If lithium/atypical augmentation fails: Try T3 augmentation (liothyronine 25-50 mcg/day even if euthyroid)
  4. If augmentation fails: Combination strategy, add mirtazapine to duloxetine ("California rocket fuel" variant) or switch entirely to venlafaxine + mirtazapine
  5. If combinations fail: Esketamine (intranasal, with oral antidepressant), FDA approved for TRD
  6. If above fails: ECT referral (especially given passive suicidal ideation)
  7. Concurrent: Psychotherapy (CBT or CBASP for chronic depression); address sleep hygiene; graded exercise

Q3. The patient asks about ketamine clinics she read about online. How do you counsel her?

Answer:Esketamine (Spravato) is the FDA-approved form for TRD, administered intranasally in certified clinical settings with 2-hour monitoring. It has strong evidence for rapid antidepressant effect (hours to days) and is used with a concurrent oral antidepressant. IV ketamine (offered in private clinics) has growing evidence but is off-label for depression, not FDA-approved, variable quality control, and insurance may not cover it. Both have similar side effects: dissociation, dizziness, sedation, nausea, BP elevation. She should discuss with her psychiatrist whether she has met the criteria to warrant esketamine (failed >= 2 adequate trials, which she has). IV ketamine clinics vary in quality; ensure any clinic has psychiatric oversight, monitoring protocols, and a plan for maintenance treatment.


Vignette 5: Elderly Depression vs Dementia

Case:

A 72-year-old retired professor is brought by his son with a 3-month history of forgetfulness, social withdrawal, poor appetite with 5 kg weight loss, and loss of interest in reading (his lifelong passion). When asked about his memory, he says "I can't remember anything anymore. My brain is finished." He appears sad, makes poor eye contact, and repeatedly answers "I don't know" to cognitive screening questions. His wife died 6 months ago.

Q1. What is your differential diagnosis, and which diagnosis is most likely?

Answer:Differential: (1) Major Depressive Disorder (most likely), presenting as pseudodementia; (2) Dementia (Alzheimer's or vascular); (3) Prolonged grief disorder; (4) Medical cause (hypothyroidism, B12 deficiency, cerebral pathology). Pseudodementia is most likely because: (a) Relatively acute onset (3 months) with dateable precipitant (wife's death); (b) Patient emphasizes cognitive deficits ("I can't remember anything") rather than minimizing them; (c) "Don't know" answers on testing (poor effort rather than genuine failure); (d) Prominent vegetative symptoms (appetite, weight loss, anhedonia); (e) Sad affect with loss of interest in previously valued activities.

Q2. How would you systematically differentiate pseudodementia from early dementia?

Answer:

  1. Cognitive testing: Apply MMSE/MoCA, in pseudodementia, patient gives up easily, says "I don't know," scores may fluctuate; in dementia, patient tries hard, near-miss answers, more consistent pattern of deficit
  2. Detailed history (from son): Onset (acute vs gradual), temporal relationship to bereavement, any confabulation, any language decline, any getting lost, any personality change
  3. Formal neuropsychological testing: Inconsistent performance in pseudodementia; consistent pattern of decline in dementia
  4. Investigations: TFT, B12, folate, CBC, ESR/CRP, RFT, LFT, blood glucose, VDRL, calcium, urine analysis
  5. Neuroimaging: MRI brain, assess for hippocampal atrophy (dementia), white matter hyperintensities (vascular depression), cortical atrophy
  6. Depression-specific scales: GDS (Geriatric Depression Scale), HAM-D
  7. Therapeutic trial: If depression suspected, start antidepressant; improvement in cognition supports pseudodementia
  8. Caveat: Pseudodementia increases risk of developing true dementia (30-50% within 5 years); longitudinal follow-up essential

Q3. How would you manage this patient?

Answer:

  1. Pharmacotherapy: SSRI first-line, escitalopram 5mg initially, titrate to 10-20mg ("start low, go slow, but go"); alternatively, mirtazapine 7.5-15mg at bedtime if insomnia, poor appetite, and weight loss are prominent (appetite-stimulating, sedating)
  2. Avoid: TCAs (anticholinergic effects in elderly, confusion, falls, urinary retention, cardiac risk); benzodiazepines (falls, paradoxical confusion, dependence)
  3. Monitor: Sodium level at 1-2 weeks (SSRI-induced hyponatremia risk higher in elderly); response assessment at 4-6 weeks
  4. Psychotherapy: Supportive therapy, grief counseling; CBT adapted for elderly; behavioral activation
  5. ECT: Consider if severe (significant weight loss with nutritional compromise), suicidal, or medication-refractory; safe and effective in elderly
  6. Social interventions: Engage son and family; assess social isolation; day center or community activities; ensure basic needs met
  7. Follow-up: Regular; repeat cognitive testing in 3-6 months to confirm improvement; remain vigilant for emergent dementia

Vignette 6: Peripartum Depression

Case:

A 28-year-old primigravida, 2 weeks postpartum, is brought by her husband. She has been persistently tearful, unable to bond with her baby, experiencing intrusive thoughts of harming the infant ("What if I drop the baby from the balcony?"), severe insomnia despite the baby sleeping, loss of appetite, and guilt ("I'm the worst mother"). She has no prior psychiatric history. She is breastfeeding.

Q1. What is the diagnosis? How do you differentiate from "baby blues"?

Answer:Major Depressive Disorder with peripartum onset (peripartum depression). Differentiation from baby blues:

FeatureBaby BluesPeripartum Depression
TimingDays 3-10 postpartumOnset within 4 weeks postpartum (DSM-5); clinically up to 1 year
DurationSelf-resolving within 2 weeksPersistent (>2 weeks)
SeverityMild mood lability, tearfulnessFull depressive syndrome (meets MDE criteria)
FunctioningIntact; can care for babyImpaired; difficulty with infant care
Prevalence50-80% of postpartum women10-15%
BondingUsually preservedImpaired
Intrusive thoughtsAbsentMay be present

This patient has full MDE criteria (>2 weeks duration, persistent low mood, anhedonia, insomnia, appetite loss, guilt) with peripartum onset. The intrusive ego-dystonic thoughts of harm ("What if I drop the baby?") are consistent with peripartum depression/OCD, these are NOT psychotic and the patient is distressed by them (ego-dystonic). However, must screen for peripartum psychosis (does she hear voices? does she believe she SHOULD harm the baby? is there bizarre behavior?).

Q2. How do you assess and manage the intrusive thoughts?

Answer:The intrusive thoughts of harming the infant are ego-dystonic (she is horrified by them, not acting on them). This pattern is consistent with peripartum OCD-like phenomena (common in peripartum depression). Key assessment: (1) Are thoughts ego-dystonic (distressing) vs ego-syntonic (rational/justified)? (2) Any command hallucinations? (3) Any delusional beliefs about the baby? (4) Any history of violence? (5) Is she avoiding the baby out of fear (protective behavior, actually a GOOD sign of intact maternal concern)?

If ego-dystonic with no psychotic features: reassure that intrusive thoughts are common and do NOT indicate danger. They indicate anxiety and hypervigilance, not intent. Support adequate supervision of mother-infant dyad without separating them (separation worsens bonding and depression).

Q3. What is your treatment plan considering she is breastfeeding?

Answer:

  1. Mild-moderate: CBT/IPT first-line (strong evidence in perinatal depression)
  2. Moderate-severe (this patient): SSRI + psychotherapy. Sertraline preferred, lowest breast milk transfer of all SSRIs; extensive safety data in breastfeeding. Start 25-50mg, titrate to 100-150mg
  3. Severe/refractory: Consider brexanolone (IV, inpatient, rapid but expensive/limited access) or zuranolone (oral, 14-day course, newer option)
  4. ECT: If severe with suicidality, psychotic features, or inability to care for self/baby; safe postpartum
  5. Practical: Ensure adequate sleep (partner/family to take some nighttime feeds, expressed milk or formula for one feed); social support; screen for domestic violence; EPDS screening
  6. Safety: Supervise mother-infant interactions supportively (not punitively); involve family; safety plan if suicidality present
  7. Avoid: Paroxetine (cardiac teratogenicity if future pregnancy), fluoxetine (higher breast milk levels), benzodiazepines (sedation in infant)

Vignette 7: Suicide Risk Assessment

Case:

A 55-year-old farmer from rural Karnataka presents to the emergency department after his family found him with a bottle of organophosphate pesticide, which he had not yet ingested. He recently lost his crop to drought, is Rs. 5 lakh in debt, his wife left him 3 months ago, and he has been drinking heavily (quarter of whisky daily for 2 months). He says "there is no point in living" and "my family would be better off without me." He appears calm and cooperative.

Q1. Perform a structured suicide risk assessment for this patient.

Answer:SAD PERSONS scoring:

Score: 7-9/10 = HIGH RISK, hospitalize.

C-SSRS assessment:

RED FLAGS: Calm demeanor after a near-attempt (may indicate decision made/relief at having a plan); access to lethal means (farmer = pesticides readily available); hopelessness ("no point"); perceived burdensomeness ("family better off without me", Joiner's interpersonal theory); multiple simultaneous stressors (financial, relational, substance use); Indian male farmer = high-risk demographic.

Q2. What immediate management is required?

Answer:

  1. Safety: Admit to psychiatric inpatient unit; 1:1 observation; remove all means (belt, sharp objects, medications)
  2. Means restriction: Counsel family to remove ALL pesticides and dangerous substances from the home and lock them securely; this is the single most effective intervention
  3. Medical clearance: Assess for organophosphate exposure even if he says he didn't ingest (check for cholinergic symptoms); blood glucose, LFT, RFT
  4. Assess for depression: Full mental status examination; HAM-D/PHQ-9; likely Major Depressive Disorder
  5. Assess for alcohol use disorder: CAGE/AUDIT; medical detoxification if indicated (risk of withdrawal seizures)
  6. Pharmacotherapy: Start SSRI (sertraline 50mg) for depression; manage alcohol withdrawal with benzodiazepine protocol if needed; consider short-term sedation for acute distress
  7. Legal considerations: Under Mental Healthcare Act 2017, Section 115, attempted suicide is NOT a criminal offense; patient to be treated, not prosecuted; document this
  8. Psychosocial: Social work consultation for financial counseling, legal aid for debt; connect with agricultural support schemes; family counseling

Q3. What population-level intervention is most relevant to preventing farming suicides in India?

Answer:Means restriction, specifically pesticide regulation. The Sri Lanka model demonstrated that banning the most toxic pesticides (WHO Class I) reduced national suicide rate by ~50% without increasing suicides by other methods (substitution did not fully occur). In India, the evidence supports: (1) Banning highly hazardous pesticides (HHPs), endosulfan already banned; expand to others; (2) Locked pesticide storage (community storage models); (3) Promoting less toxic alternatives (integrated pest management); (4) Training primary healthcare workers in rural areas to detect depression (mhGAP model); (5) Addressing root causes, crop insurance, debt relief, irrigation. The Pesticides Management Bill in India has been debated; implementing it would save lives.


Vignette 8: SSRI Non-Response

Case:

A 38-year-old IT professional was started on escitalopram 10mg for Major Depressive Disorder (moderate severity) 6 weeks ago. He reports "no change" in mood. He takes the medication "most days" and occasionally skips weekends. His PHQ-9 score is 18 (unchanged from baseline of 19).

Q1. Before diagnosing treatment failure, what factors should you assess?

Answer:Pseudo-resistance checklist:

  1. Adherence: He admits to skipping weekends, this is intermittent non-adherence. Escitalopram has a 27-32 hour half-life; weekend skipping may significantly reduce effectiveness. Ask specifically about missed doses, pill counts, pharmacy records
  2. Adequate dose: 10mg is the starting/therapeutic dose; may need optimization to 15-20mg before calling this a failure
  3. Adequate duration: 6 weeks is borderline adequate; some patients respond at 8-12 weeks
  4. Diagnosis review: Re-screen for bipolarity (MDQ), check for comorbidities (thyroid, B12, substance use, sleep disorder, personality pathology)
  5. Psychosocial factors: Ongoing stressors? Work stress in IT sector? Relationship issues? Sleep hygiene?
  6. Comorbid anxiety: May need higher dose or adjunctive treatment
  7. Substance use: Screen for alcohol, cannabis, other substances

Q2. What is your management plan?

Answer:

  1. Optimize current trial first: Increase escitalopram to 20mg; address adherence (psychoeducation about daily dosing, set phone reminders, identify barriers to adherence); reassess in 4 weeks
  2. If still no response at 20mg after 4 additional weeks: This constitutes a true Thase-Rush Stage I failure
  3. Next step, SWITCH (since no response rather than partial response): Switch to SNRI (venlafaxine XR 75mg titrate to 150-225mg) or duloxetine (60-120mg)
  4. Concurrent psychotherapy: CBT, strong evidence as adjunct; behavioral activation if initiation of CBT is delayed
  5. Sleep hygiene and exercise: Both have evidence as adjuncts to pharmacotherapy
  6. If partial response to SNRI: Augment with aripiprazole 2-5mg or lithium 600-900mg

Q3. He asks if he can stop medication once he feels better. How do you counsel him?

Answer:After remission is achieved: continue at the same dose for at least 6-12 months (continuation phase) to prevent relapse. This is his first episode, so after 6-12 months of sustained remission, gradual taper over 4-8 weeks is reasonable. If he has recurrent episodes (2+ episodes, or 1 severe episode with suicidality/psychosis), maintenance treatment may be indefinite. Abrupt discontinuation risks: (1) Relapse; (2) Discontinuation syndrome (dizziness, sensory disturbances, GI upset, less common with escitalopram vs paroxetine/venlafaxine but still possible). Educate that antidepressants are NOT addictive (common misconception) but should not be stopped abruptly.


Vignette 9: Mixed Features

Case:

A 30-year-old woman with known Bipolar I Disorder presents with 5 days of elevated mood, decreased sleep (4 hours/night, feels energized), grandiose plans to start a restaurant chain, and pressured speech. However, she simultaneously reports feeling "desperately sad inside," frequent crying episodes, and suicidal thoughts. She says "I have all this energy but I want to die."

Q1. What DSM-5 specifier applies to this presentation?

Answer:Manic episode with mixed features. She meets full criteria for a manic episode (elevated mood, decreased sleep need, grandiosity, pressured speech, >7 days if criteria have been met). The mixed features specifier requires >= 3 concurrent depressive symptoms during the manic episode: (1) Depressed mood ("desperately sad inside"); (2) Diminished interest is not clearly mentioned but crying episodes suggest; (3) Suicidal ideation. Three depressive symptoms during mania qualifies for the "with mixed features" specifier.

Clinical significance: Mixed features = HIGHER suicide risk than pure mania. The combination of manic energy/impulsivity with depressive hopelessness/suicidality is particularly dangerous.

Q2. How does this presentation change your treatment approach compared to pure mania?

Answer:Key treatment differences:

  1. Avoid antidepressants entirely, worse outcomes in mixed states
  2. Lithium may be LESS effective in mixed presentations compared to pure euphoric mania
  3. Valproate often preferred, better evidence for mixed states than lithium
  4. Atypical antipsychotics: Olanzapine, quetiapine, aripiprazole, asenapine all have evidence for mixed mania
  5. Combination therapy often needed earlier: Mood stabilizer + atypical antipsychotic
  6. Higher suicide monitoring: Mixed features = highest suicide risk in bipolar; consider inpatient admission; 1:1 observation if actively suicidal; remove means

Q3. What is the suicide risk profile of this patient?

Answer:VERY HIGH. Risk factors: (1) Active suicidal ideation during a mood episode; (2) Mixed features (energy + impulsivity to act on suicidal thoughts); (3) Female (more attempts); (4) Known bipolar disorder (15-20x general population suicide rate); (5) Current acute episode. Protective factor assessment needed: children? social support? religious beliefs? Immediate safety planning required. This patient should be hospitalized until the mixed episode resolves. The lethality of mixed states is that patients have the depressive wish to die AND the manic energy to act on it, the most dangerous combination in all of psychiatry.


Vignette 10: Rapid Cycling

Case:

A 40-year-old woman with Bipolar II Disorder has had 6 mood episodes in the past 12 months (4 depressive, 2 hypomanic). She is currently on lithium 900mg/day (level 0.7 mEq/L) and sertraline 100mg/day. Her last TSH was 8.2 mIU/L (elevated; reference 0.5-4.5).

Q1. What pattern does this represent, and what are the likely contributing factors?

Answer:Rapid cycling, defined as >= 4 mood episodes in 12 months. She has had 6 episodes, qualifying clearly. Contributing factors in this case:

  1. Antidepressant use (sertraline), classic trigger for rapid cycling; antidepressants can accelerate cycle frequency, particularly in bipolar
  2. Hypothyroidism (TSH 8.2), unrecognized or undertreated hypothyroidism is a well-established risk factor for rapid cycling and medication resistance
  3. Female sex, rapid cycling is 2-3x more common in women
  4. BP-II, rapid cycling is more common in BP-II than BP-I

Q2. What immediate changes would you make to her treatment?

Answer:

  1. Taper and discontinue sertraline, antidepressant withdrawal is the first and most critical intervention in rapid cycling. Taper over 2-4 weeks
  2. Treat hypothyroidism, start levothyroxine (50-75 mcg initially; titrate to normalize TSH). This alone may significantly reduce cycling. Target TSH in lower normal range
  3. Optimize/switch mood stabilizer: Lithium may be LESS effective in rapid cycling. Options: (a) Add valproate to lithium (combination therapy); or (b) Switch to valproate monotherapy if lithium has been clearly ineffective; or (c) Lamotrigine addition for depression prevention (given 4 depressive vs 2 hypomanic episodes, her predominant polarity is depressive)
  4. Monitor closely, mood charting (daily mood diary) is essential for tracking response

Q3. After 3 months, thyroid is normalized, sertraline discontinued, and she is on lithium + valproate. She develops a depressive episode. How do you manage it?

Answer:Bipolar depression in a rapid-cycling patient, this is among the hardest presentations to treat:

  1. Do NOT reintroduce antidepressants, high risk of re-inducing rapid cycling
  2. First-line: Quetiapine 300mg (evidence for bipolar depression; won't destabilize cycling)
  3. Alternative/adjunct: Lamotrigine (titrate slowly; better for prevention but can be trialed acutely)
  4. Lurasidone: FDA approved for bipolar depression; add to lithium/valproate
  5. Optimize existing mood stabilizers: Ensure valproate level in upper therapeutic range
  6. If refractory: ECT (effective in bipolar depression, no cycling risk)
  7. Psychotherapy: CBT adapted for bipolar, IPSRT for rhythm stabilization
  8. Lifestyle: Sleep hygiene (critical in rapid cycling, any sleep disruption can trigger episodes), regular social rhythms, exercise

Vignette 11: Valproate in Women of Childbearing Age

Case:

A 26-year-old newly married woman with Bipolar I Disorder has been stable on valproate 1000mg/day for 3 years (no episodes since starting). She comes for preconception counseling as she and her husband wish to start a family within the year.

Q1. What are the teratogenic risks of valproate, and why is this an ethical dilemma?

Answer:Valproate teratogenicity:

  1. Neural tube defects: 1-2% risk (10x general population), spina bifida most common
  2. Neurodevelopmental effects: Average 8-9 IQ point reduction in children exposed in utero (NEAD study); higher rates of autism spectrum disorder, developmental delay, and learning disabilities
  3. Other malformations: Craniofacial, cardiac, limb defects
  4. Dose-dependent: Higher doses = greater risk; no established safe threshold

The ethical dilemma: She has been stable for 3 years on this medication. Switching introduces: (1) Risk of relapse during switch; (2) Risk of relapse during pregnancy if alternative is less effective; (3) Manic or depressive episodes during pregnancy are themselves harmful to fetus and mother. However, continuing valproate exposes the fetus to serious, well-documented harm. Recent EMA/MHRA guidelines effectively contraindicate valproate in women of childbearing age unless no alternative exists and a Pregnancy Prevention Programme is in place. The principle of informed consent and shared decision-making is critical.

Q2. What is your management plan?

Answer:

  1. Switch medication BEFORE conception, do NOT wait until pregnancy is confirmed (NTD risk is highest in first 4-6 weeks, often before pregnancy is recognized)
  2. Switch to safer mood stabilizer: Lamotrigine is the preferred option, best safety data in pregnancy (minimal teratogenicity); effective for bipolar maintenance, especially depression prevention. Titrate lamotrigine UP while tapering valproate DOWN (cross-titration). Note: valproate inhibits lamotrigine metabolism, so lamotrigine levels will RISE as valproate is withdrawn
  3. Alternative: Lithium, effective for maintenance; Ebstein's anomaly risk is ~0.1% (lower than historically cited); requires level monitoring through pregnancy; dose adjustments needed (GFR increases in pregnancy clearance increases may need dose increase; then after delivery GFR drops risk of toxicity); fetal echocardiography at 16-20 weeks
  4. High-dose folic acid: 5mg/day (not standard 400mcg), start at least 1 month before conception; continue through first trimester
  5. Contraception until switch is complete and stable (3-6 months on new medication without relapse before attempting conception)
  6. Multidisciplinary team: Psychiatrist + obstetrician + genetic counselor
  7. Monitor closely during switch and pregnancy, pregnancy is a high-risk period for relapse

Q3. She asks if she can "just stop all medications during pregnancy." How do you counsel her?

Answer:Stopping all medication is NOT recommended for Bipolar I Disorder. Relapse rates off medications during pregnancy are very high, up to 70% (Viguera et al., 2007). A manic episode during pregnancy poses serious risks: poor self-care, risky behavior, substance use, impaired judgment, nonadherence to prenatal care, and postpartum psychosis risk. A depressive episode risks: poor nutrition, self-harm/suicide, impaired bonding, preeclampsia association. The goal is to find the safest effective medication, not to be medication-free. Lamotrigine offers the best benefit-risk ratio. The decision should be collaborative, fully informed, and documented.


Vignette 12: Seasonal Affective Disorder

Case:

A 35-year-old software developer relocated from Bangalore to London 2 years ago. For both winters since the move, she has experienced low mood beginning in October, resolving spontaneously by March. Symptoms include hypersomnia (sleeping 11-12 hours), carbohydrate craving, weight gain (4 kg each winter), fatigue, and social withdrawal. Her summers are entirely normal. She had no such symptoms in Bangalore.

Q1. What is the diagnosis and what is the pathophysiology?

Answer:Major Depressive Disorder, recurrent, with seasonal pattern (Seasonal Affective Disorder, SAD). Criteria: (1) Regular temporal relationship between onset of depressive episodes and a particular time of year; (2) Full remissions at a characteristic time (spring); (3) >= 2 major depressive episodes with seasonal pattern in last 2 years; (4) Seasonal episodes substantially outnumber non-seasonal episodes over lifetime.

Pathophysiology:

Q2. What are the first-line treatment options?

Answer:

  1. Light therapy (phototherapy): FIRST-LINE for SAD. 10,000 lux bright light box for 30 minutes each morning (upon waking). Position 16-24 inches from face, eyes open but not staring directly at light. Response typically within 1-2 weeks. Continue through the winter season. Evidence-based; comparable efficacy to SSRIs for seasonal depression
  2. SSRIs: Fluoxetine or sertraline, effective for SAD; can be used alone or combined with light therapy; bupropion XL approved for PREVENTION of seasonal depression (start in autumn before symptom onset)
  3. CBT adapted for SAD: Evidence-based; may have more durable effects than light therapy (lower relapse rate in subsequent winter)
  4. Lifestyle: Regular exercise, maximize outdoor daylight exposure (walk during lunch), maintain social activities, vitamin D supplementation (often deficient at high latitudes)

Q3. She asks about prevention for next winter. What do you advise?

Answer:(1) Begin light therapy prophylactically in September/October (before symptoms onset); (2) Bupropion XL 150-300mg starting in early autumn, FDA approved for prevention of seasonal MDE; (3) Maintain exercise routine through autumn-winter; (4) Vitamin D supplementation (1000-2000 IU daily through winter); (5) Consider a dawn simulator alarm clock (gradually increases light in bedroom before waking); (6) If considering relocation back to India, this would effectively treat the condition; (7) Monitor mood with a brief weekly self-rating (PHQ-2 or mood diary) to catch early symptoms.


Vignette 13: Psychotic Depression

Case:

A 58-year-old woman presents with 6 weeks of severe depression, pervasive low mood, total anhedonia, psychomotor retardation (barely moves, speaks in whispers), 8 kg weight loss from food refusal, and early morning awakening at 3 AM. She believes her internal organs are "rotting away" and that she is already dead. She says the police are coming to arrest her for crimes she committed in a past life.

Q1. What is the diagnosis and what specific features are present?

Answer:Major Depressive Disorder, severe, with mood-congruent psychotic features. Specific features:

  1. Melancholic features: Total anhedonia, distinct quality of depressed mood, psychomotor retardation, early morning awakening, significant weight loss, worse in morning (likely)
  2. Nihilistic delusions (Cotard syndrome): Believes organs are "rotting" and she is "already dead", Cotard's delusion/syndrome is pathognomonic of psychotic depression; involves nihilistic delusions about the body, existence, or the world
  3. Delusions of guilt: Believes she committed crimes, mood-congruent guilt delusion
  4. Persecutory ideation: Believes police will arrest her, this could be mood-congruent (punishment for perceived crimes) or mood-incongruent (if unrelated to guilt theme)
  5. Nutritional compromise: 8 kg weight loss from food refusal, medical emergency

Q2. What is the optimal treatment for this presentation?

Answer:Psychotic depression requires COMBINATION treatment or ECT, antidepressant monotherapy is insufficient:

  1. ECT, strongest recommendation: For this patient specifically, ECT is arguably the FIRST-LINE treatment because: (a) Psychotic depression responds best to ECT (>80% response rate); (b) Nutritional compromise is a clear indication; (c) Fastest onset of all treatments; (d) Cotard syndrome responds particularly well to ECT. Bilateral placement preferred for psychotic depression.
  1. Pharmacotherapy (if ECT not immediately available): Antidepressant + antipsychotic combination. Examples: (a) Venlafaxine + olanzapine (evidence from Meyers et al., STOP-PD study); (b) Sertraline + olanzapine; (c) TCA (nortriptyline) + antipsychotic. Antidepressant alone is INFERIOR to combination for psychotic depression.
  1. Supportive care: IV fluids and nutrition if refusing oral intake; 1:1 nursing observation (suicide risk very high in psychotic depression); monitor medical status (dehydration, electrolytes, muscle wasting).

Q3. After successful ECT treatment, she remits. What is the maintenance plan?

Answer:(1) Continue antidepressant + antipsychotic for at least 6-12 months post-remission (STOP-PD II study showed discontinuing olanzapine led to high relapse rates); (2) Maintenance ECT: weekly biweekly monthly, especially if she has relapsed on pharmacotherapy before; (3) Gradual taper of antipsychotic can be attempted after 4-6 months if stable, with close monitoring for relapse; (4) If antipsychotic discontinued, maintain antidepressant indefinitely (given severity of this episode); (5) Longitudinal monitoring, psychotic depression has high recurrence rate; educate family about early warning signs.


Vignette 14: Lamotrigine Rash Scenario

Case:

A 32-year-old man with Bipolar II Disorder was started on lamotrigine 2 weeks ago for maintenance (currently on 25mg/day, titrating per protocol). He calls today reporting a "rash on his arms" that appeared yesterday. He has no fever, no mucosal involvement, no pain, and the rash is described as a few scattered, non-confluent papules.

Q1. How do you assess whether this rash is benign or a harbinger of Stevens-Johnson Syndrome?

Answer:Critical assessment, this is a medical decision, not a reassurance call:

FeatureBenign RashConcerning for SJS/TEN
TimingAnytimeTypically within 8 weeks of starting (peak risk)
Mucosal involvementNoneYES, oral, genital, ocular (pathognomonic)
Systemic symptomsNoneFever, malaise, arthralgias
PainNoneSkin tenderness, burning
Rash characterScattered papules, not confluentConfluent, purpuric, targetoid, blistering, epidermal detachment
ProgressionStable or resolvingRapidly spreading
Nikolsky signNegativePositive (epidermis shears with pressure)

In this patient: no fever, no mucosal involvement, no pain, non-confluent papules, likely benign. HOWEVER, the standard of care is conservative.

Q2. What is your management recommendation?

Answer:

  1. Default position: STOP lamotrigine until the rash is formally evaluated. This is the standard recommendation, when in doubt, stop. The risk of missing early SJS far outweighs the inconvenience of stopping a medication that can be restarted.
  2. See the patient in person TODAY or within 24 hours, rash cannot be adequately assessed by phone/telemedicine alone
  3. Examine for: Mucosal lesions (mouth, eyes, genitals), skin tenderness, Nikolsky sign, confluence, facial involvement, blistering
  4. If benign rash confirmed: May cautiously restart lamotrigine at a LOWER dose (12.5mg) with even slower titration. Some clinicians add antihistamine
  5. If any concerning features: Do NOT restart lamotrigine. Switch to alternative (lithium, quetiapine). Dermatology consultation
  6. If SJS confirmed: Emergency hospitalization, dermatology/burns unit, supportive care (similar to burns management), stop ALL potential causative drugs
  7. Educate patient: "If the rash spreads, if you develop mouth sores, eye irritation, fever, or if it hurts, go to the emergency department immediately"

Q3. What factors increase the risk of lamotrigine-induced SJS?

Answer:(1) Rapid titration, the single most important modifiable risk factor; slower = safer; (2) Concurrent valproate, doubles lamotrigine levels; if on valproate, must halve the lamotrigine titration rate; (3) Young age, children and adolescents at higher risk; (4) History of rash with other anticonvulsants; (5) HLA-B*1502 allele, same allele associated with carbamazepine SJS; some evidence for lamotrigine too, especially in Asian populations; (6) Higher starting dose; (7) Immune activation, concurrent infection may increase risk. Risk is highest in the first 8 weeks and essentially drops to baseline after 6 months of stable dosing.


Vignette 15: Serotonin Syndrome from Drug Interaction

Case:

A 45-year-old woman on fluoxetine 40mg for Major Depressive Disorder visits an orthopedic surgeon for back pain. The surgeon prescribes tramadol 50mg TDS. Three days later, she presents to the ER with agitation, confusion, profuse sweating, tachycardia (HR 120), blood pressure 160/95, temperature 38.8C, bilateral lower limb clonus, hyperreflexia, and myoclonic jerks. Her pupils are dilated.

Q1. What is the diagnosis, and what caused it?

Answer:Serotonin syndrome caused by the combination of fluoxetine (SSRI, serotonin reuptake inhibitor) + tramadol (opioid with serotonin reuptake inhibition properties). Fluoxetine is also a potent CYP2D6 inhibitor, which would further increase tramadol levels (tramadol is metabolized by CYP2D6).

Hunter Criteria assessment:

Key features present: Mental status change (agitation, confusion), autonomic instability (tachycardia, hypertension, hyperthermia, diaphoresis, mydriasis), neuromuscular hyperactivity (clonus, hyperreflexia, myoclonus). The classic triad: HAM = Hyperactivity (neuromuscular), Autonomic instability, Mental status changes.

Q2. How do you differentiate this from Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome (NMS)?

Answer:

FeatureThis Patient (Serotonin Syndrome)NMS
OnsetRapid (3 days, hours to days)Slow (days to weeks)
Causative agentSerotonergic drugsDopamine antagonists (antipsychotics)
NeuromuscularCLONUS, hyperreflexia, myoclonusLead-pipe RIGIDITY, bradyreflexia
PupilsMydriasis (dilated)Normal
BowelsDiarrheaNormal or ileus
CKMild elevationMARKEDLY elevated (often >1000)
TemperatureElevated (38.8C)Often higher (>40C)
ResolutionHours to days after drug withdrawalDays to weeks

The presence of CLONUS (especially lower limb), hyperreflexia, and rapid onset with serotonergic drugs clinches serotonin syndrome. NMS would show rigidity and bradyreflexia.

Q3. What is the management of this patient?

Answer:

  1. Stop ALL serotonergic agents immediately, discontinue both fluoxetine and tramadol
  2. Supportive care: IV fluids (hydration), continuous monitoring (HR, BP, temperature, SpO2), cooling measures for hyperthermia (cooling blankets, ice packs, tepid sponging; avoid antipyretics, fever is from muscle activity, not hypothalamic)
  3. Benzodiazepines: Lorazepam 1-2mg IV for agitation and to reduce neuromuscular hyperactivity
  4. Cyproheptadine: Specific antidote, 5-HT2A antagonist. Loading dose 12mg PO/NG, then 4-8mg every 2 hours until improvement (max 32mg/day). Oral/NG only (no parenteral form)
  5. If severe (temperature >41.1C, seizures, arrhythmias): ICU admission, intubation, neuromuscular paralysis (non-depolarizing agent, NOT succinylcholine as it may worsen hyperkalemia from rhabdomyolysis), mechanical ventilation
  6. Monitor: CK (rhabdomyolysis risk), renal function (myoglobin nephropathy), electrolytes, coagulation (DIC risk in severe cases)
  7. Expected resolution: 24-72 hours after drug discontinuation (fluoxetine has a long half-life, so may take longer)
  8. Follow-up: When stable, restart antidepressant (avoid tramadol in the future); educate about drug interactions; for pain management, alternatives include paracetamol, NSAIDs, gabapentin, or non-serotonergic opioids (morphine, oxycodone have minimal serotonergic activity)
  9. Systems-level learning: This was a prescribing error, the orthopedic surgeon should have checked her medication list. Advocate for electronic prescribing alerts for serotonergic drug combinations. Common dangerous combinations: SSRI/SNRI + tramadol, SSRI/SNRI + MAOI, SSRI/SNRI + linezolid, SSRI/SNRI + methylene blue, SSRI/SNRI + St. John's wort

← All study guides