← All study guides
Guide 19 · Part IV

HIV Parkinsons Neuropsych

Paper IV · Neurology, Medicine & Recent Advances. Six study modes, from notes to quick review.

Most askedHAND classification pathophysiologyAnti-NMDAR encephalitisPD psychosis antipsychoticsHIV psychiatric comorbiditiesHuntington genetics counsellingNeurosyphilis GPI
Jump to a section
Chapter 01

Study Notes


Comprehensive Study Notes for MD Psychiatry Exit Examination


PART 1: HIV & NEUROPSYCHIATRY


1.1 EPIDEMIOLOGY AND OVERVIEW

HIV (Human Immunodeficiency Virus) infects approximately 38 million people globally. In India, the estimated prevalence is ~2.3 million. The neuropsychiatric burden of HIV is substantial:


1.2 HIV-ASSOCIATED NEUROCOGNITIVE DISORDERS (HAND)

Box: HAND Classification (Antinori et al., 2007)
Neuropsychological Domains Assessed in HAND

Six domains must be assessed:

  1. Learning/Memory, verbal and visual
  2. Attention/Working Memory, most commonly impaired
  3. Executive Function, planning, cognitive flexibility
  4. Speed of Information Processing, psychomotor slowing (hallmark)
  5. Language, verbal fluency
  6. Motor Skills, fine motor speed, coordination

Key Feature: HAND is a subcortical dementia, psychomotor slowing, personality change, poor concentration, memory retrieval deficits (not encoding). Contrast with Alzheimer's (cortical, aphasia, apraxia, agnosia).


1.3 PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF HAND

Direct Viral Neurotoxicity

HIV does not directly infect neurons (neurons lack CD4 receptors). Instead:

  1. Macrophage/Microglia Reservoir: HIV infects macrophages and microglia in the CNS. These become reservoirs for viral replication.
  1. HIV proteins as neurotoxins:
  2. gp120 (viral envelope glycoprotein): Binds CXCR4/CCR5 on neurons calcium influx excitotoxicity apoptosis
  3. Tat protein: Disrupts blood-brain barrier, induces oxidative stress, activates microglia, dysregulates neurotransmitter systems (dopamine pathway particularly affected)
  4. Vpr: Promotes apoptosis
  5. gp41: Mitochondrial dysfunction
  1. Bystander neurotoxicity: HIV-infected macrophages release cytokines (IL-1β, TNF-α, IL-6), quinolinic acid (NMDA agonist excitotoxicity), and reactive oxygen species
Immune Activation
CNS Penetration Effectiveness (CPE) Score of ART

Not all ART drugs penetrate the CNS equally. CPE score (0–4 per drug, summed for regimen):


1.4 ASSESSMENT: INTERNATIONAL HIV DEMENTIA SCALE (IHDS)

Box: IHDS: 3 Components

Sensitivity: 74% | Specificity: 54% for HAD

Advantage: Bedside tool, culturally applicable, quick (<5 minutes)

Limitation: Not validated for ANI/MND, misses milder forms

Other assessment tools:


1.5 CNS OPPORTUNISTIC INFECTIONS IN HIV

1.5.1 Toxoplasma Encephalitis

Organism: Toxoplasma gondii (intracellular protozoan)

Mechanism: Reactivation of latent cysts (primary infection usually acquired in childhood from cat feces or undercooked meat)

CD4 threshold: Typically <100 cells/μL (most common when <50)

Epidemiology: Most common mass lesion in HIV in developing world

Clinical Features:

Neuroimaging:

Diagnosis:

Treatment:


1.5.2 Progressive Multifocal Leukoencephalopathy (PML)

Organism: JC virus (John Cunningham virus), polyomavirus

Mechanism: Reactivation of latent JC virus in oligodendrocytes lytic infection demyelination

CD4 threshold: Typically <200 cells/μL

Clinical Features:

Neuroimaging:

Diagnosis:

Treatment:


1.5.3 Cryptococcal Meningitis

Organism: Cryptococcus neoformans (encapsulated yeast)

CD4 threshold: Typically <100 cells/μL (most common when <50)

Route: Inhalation pulmonary hematogenous spread to CNS

High-yield: Polysaccharide capsule resists phagocytosis; capsule visible with India ink stain

Clinical Features:

CSF Findings:

Parameter · Typical Finding
Opening pressure Elevated (>200 mm H2O) in 75%
WBC Normal or mild lymphocytosis (<20 cells)
Protein Mildly elevated or normal
Glucose Low
India ink Positive in 70–80%
Cryptococcal antigen (CrAg) >95% sensitivity, gold standard
Culture Definitive, takes days

Diagnosis:

Treatment:


1.5.4 CMV Encephalitis / Retinitis

Organism: Cytomegalovirus (herpesvirus)

CD4 threshold: <50 cells/μL (most immunosuppressed patients)

CMV Retinitis (most common CMV manifestation):

CMV Encephalitis:

CMV Polyradiculopathy:


1.5.5 Other CNS OIs
ConditionOrganismCD4 LevelKey Feature
CNS LymphomaEBV-associated<50Single ring-enhancing mass, SPECT shows hypermetabolism (vs hypometabolism in toxo)
TB MeningitisM. tuberculosisAny, worse <200Basilar meningitis, CN palsies, communicating hydrocephalus
HSV EncephalitisHSV-1 (reactivation)<50Temporal lobe, hemorrhagic; treat with acyclovir
NeurosyphilisT. pallidumAnyMeningovascular, general paresis, tabes; treat with benzyl penicillin
MAC/MAIM. avium complex<50Systemic; CNS rare

1.6 PSYCHIATRIC DISORDERS IN HIV

1.6.1 Depression in HIV

Prevalence: 30–60% (vs ~10–15% general population)

Why so high?

  1. Direct neurobiological effects of HIV (viral proteins, cytokine dysregulation, HPA axis activation)
  2. Substance use comorbidity (bidirectional)
  3. Psychosocial burden: stigma, discrimination, bereavement, financial stress, illness adjustment
  4. ART side effects (particularly efavirenz)
  5. Nutritional deficiencies (B12, folate)
  6. OI-related factors

Clinical Assessment Challenges:

Treatment:


1.6.2 Adjustment Disorder

1.6.3 Mania in HIV: Important High-Yield Topic

Two types:

Type 1, Primary Bipolar Disorder (pre-existing):

Type 2, Secondary/HIV-Associated Mania (Late-Stage):

ART-Associated Mania:

Treatment of HIV-Associated Mania:


1.6.4 Psychosis in HIV

Prevalence: ~15% lifetime risk (vs 1% general population)

Types:

  1. HIV-related psychosis (direct neurological involvement, HAD with psychotic features)
  2. Substance-induced psychosis (cannabis, methamphetamine, very common in HIV populations)
  3. OI-related psychosis (CNS toxoplasmosis, PML, cryptococcal meningitis presenting with behavioral disturbance)
  4. ART-induced psychosis (efavirenz most common)
  5. Steroid-induced psychosis (used for PCP pneumonia, IRIS, CNS lymphoma)
  6. Primary psychotic illness comorbid with HIV

Clinical approach:

Treatment:


1.6.5 Anxiety Disorders

1.6.6 Substance Use in HIV

Bidirectional relationship:

Key Substances:


1.7 ART AND PSYCHIATRIC SIDE EFFECTS

Box: ART Neuropsychiatric Side Effects
Drug ClassDrugCNS/Psychiatric Effects
NNRTIEfavirenzVivid/disturbing dreams, insomnia, depression, anxiety, confusion, MANIA, psychosis, in 40–52%
NNRTINevirapineLess CNS effects than EFV
NNRTIRilpivirineDepression (rare)
NRTIZidovudine (AZT)Headache, insomnia, anxiety, anemia
NRTIDidanosine (ddI)Peripheral neuropathy
NRTIStavudine (d4T)Peripheral neuropathy, lipoatrophy (psychiatric impact)
INSTIDolutegravir (DTG)Insomnia, depression (reported; being studied)
PIRitonavirCircumoral paresthesias, taste disturbances (via CYP interactions with other drugs)

Efavirenz Mechanism for CNS Effects:


1.8 ART ADHERENCE AND PSYCHIATRIC FACTORS

Target adherence: >95% for viral suppression with older agents; newer long-acting injectables allow monthly dosing

Psychiatric barriers to adherence:

  1. Active depression, most studied; OR 3.4 for non-adherence
  2. Psychosis, grandiosity ("I don't need pills"), paranoia about medications
  3. Active substance use, chaotic lifestyle
  4. Neurocognitive impairment, forgetting doses (ANI/MND/HAD)
  5. PTSD, avoidance of reminders of HIV
  6. Adverse effects, efavirenz dream disturbance leads to pill-stopping

Strategies:


1.9 HIV TESTING AND COUNSELING

Voluntary Counseling and Testing (VCT)

Components of VCT:

  1. Pre-test counseling: Risk assessment, meaning of test, implications of results, informed consent
  2. HIV Testing: ELISA (4th generation, detects p24 antigen + anti-HIV antibody), confirmatory Western Blot or NAAT
  3. Post-test counseling: Positive or negative results communicated with support, linkage to care

Window Period:

PPTCT (Prevention of Parent-to-Child Transmission):

Provider-Initiated Testing and Counseling (PITC):


Types of stigma:

  1. Instrumental stigma: Fear of contagion
  2. Symbolic stigma: Moral judgment (association with "immoral" behavior)
  3. Courtesy stigma: Stigma extending to family members
  4. Internalized stigma: Self-stigma, shame, worthlessness

Psychiatric impact:

UNAIDS 3 Zeros approach: Zero new infections, zero AIDS-related deaths, zero discrimination


PART 2: PARKINSON'S DISEASE & PSYCHIATRY


2.1 OVERVIEW

Parkinson's disease (PD) is the second most common neurodegenerative disorder after Alzheimer's disease. It is primarily characterized by dopaminergic neuronal loss in the substantia nigra pars compacta, producing the classic motor tetrad. However, PD is now understood as a whole-brain, whole-body disease with extensive non-motor manifestations, particularly neuropsychiatric.

Key neuropathology: Lewy bodies (eosinophilic intracytoplasmic inclusions composed primarily of alpha-synuclein aggregates)

Braak staging of PD pathology:


2.2 DEPRESSION IN PARKINSON'S DISEASE

Prevalence: 40–50% (most common neuropsychiatric symptom of PD)

Point prevalence: 17% MDD, 22% minor depression/dysthymia

Key distinction: PD depression is not simply reactive, it has neurobiological underpinnings distinct from primary MDD

Neurobiological Basis
Clinical Features of PD Depression vs Primary MDD
FeaturePD DepressionPrimary MDD
AnxietyVery prominent (frequent panic attacks)Variable
Guilt/worthlessnessLess prominentProminent
Suicidal ideationLess common, less lethal plansMore common
AnhedoniaPresent, prominentPresent
Diurnal variationLess classicMore classic
Mood reactivityPresent (responds to positive events)Absent in melancholic
IrritabilityProminentVariable
OnsetMay predate motor symptomsTypically after stress/trigger

Note: Depression is a prodromal feature of PD, may appear years before motor symptoms (Braak stages 1–2 involvement of serotonergic/noradrenergic systems)

Assessment
Treatment

Pharmacological:

Non-pharmacological:


2.3 ANXIETY IN PARKINSON'S DISEASE

Prevalence: 30–40%

Often comorbid with depression (anxiety-depression couplet very common in PD)

Types:

  1. Generalized anxiety (most common)
  2. Panic attacks, often coincide with "OFF" state (low dopamine fluctuations)
  3. Social phobia, related to embarrassment about motor symptoms
  4. Specific phobias, falling phobia

Key feature: "OFF-period anxiety", anxiety correlates with dopamine fluctuations. Patients experience intense anxiety, panic, dysphoria when dopaminergic medication wears off. This is not a primary psychiatric condition, it responds to optimization of dopamine therapy (smoother motor control).

Treatment:


2.4 PSYCHOSIS IN PARKINSON'S DISEASE

Prevalence: 20–40% over disease course; up to 75% in advanced disease

Clinical Features

Spectrum of psychotic symptoms:

  1. Illusions, misidentifying objects/shadows (early)
  2. Presence hallucinations, sensing someone behind them (early, benign)
  3. Passage hallucinations, brief peripheral vision movement (early, benign)
  4. Formed visual hallucinations (VH), most characteristic of PD psychosis
  5. People, animals, objects
  6. Usually non-threatening initially ("friendly visitors")
  7. Clear consciousness (can distinguish from reality)
  8. Eventually become frightening
  9. Auditory hallucinations, less common; when prominent, consider DLB or comorbid psychiatric illness
  10. Delusions, typically paranoid, persecutory, or Othello syndrome (morbid jealousy)
Risk Factors for PD Psychosis
Pathophysiology
Management: Step-Wise Approach

Step 1, Address reversible causes:

Step 2, Antipsychotic Treatment:

IMPORTANT NOTE ON PIMAVANSERIN (vs PIMELOZIDE):


2.5 IMPULSE CONTROL DISORDERS (ICD) IN PARKINSON'S DISEASE

Prevalence: ~13.6% of PD patients on dopamine agonists (DOMINION study, Weintraub 2010)

Types
  1. Pathological gambling, most common ICD
  2. Hypersexuality, may cause significant marital distress
  3. Compulsive eating/binge eating
  4. Compulsive shopping (oniomania)
  5. Punding, complex, stereotyped, repetitive behaviors (sorting, collecting, tinkering)
  6. Dopamine Dysregulation Syndrome (DDS), see below
Risk Factors
Mechanism
Management

2.6 DOPAMINE DYSREGULATION SYNDROME (DDS)

Definition: Compulsive use and misuse of dopaminergic medications in PD, beyond what is required for motor symptom control; characterized by addictive behavior toward levodopa/dopamine agonists

Features:

Risk factors: Previous substance use disorder, impulsive personality, younger onset PD

Treatment:


2.7 COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENT AND DEMENTIA IN PD

Parkinson's Disease Dementia (PDD)

Prevalence: ~80% of PD patients will develop dementia over 20 years of disease

Onset: Usually >10 years after motor symptom onset (distinguishes from DLB, see below)

Cognitive profile:

Treatment:

DLB vs PDD: The "One-Year Rule"

Clinically, DLB and PDD are probably the same disease at different time points, together called "Lewy body spectrum disorders"


2.8 SLEEP DISORDERS IN PARKINSON'S DISEASE

Prevalence of sleep disturbance: >90% of PD patients

Types
  1. REM Sleep Behavior Disorder (RBD):
  2. Prodromal marker of PD (may precede motor symptoms by >10 years)
  3. Acting out dreams during REM sleep (no atonia)
  4. Punch, kick, shout during sleep
  5. Risk of injury to self or bed partner
  6. Treatment: Clonazepam (0.25–0.5 mg), melatonin (high dose, 3–12 mg)
  1. Excessive Daytime Sleepiness (EDS):
  2. Common; multifactorial
  3. Dopamine agonists are major cause (especially pramipexole, "sleep attacks")
  4. Sleep attacks: Sudden irresistible sleep (can occur while driving)
  5. Treat: Reduce/change agonist; modafinil, caffeine
  1. Insomnia:
  2. Nocturia, pain, rigidity, depression, medication effects
  3. Sleep fragmentation in PD common
  1. Restless Legs Syndrome (RLS):
  2. More common in PD
  3. Responds to dopaminergic therapy

2.9 APATHY IN PARKINSON'S DISEASE

Definition: Quantitative reduction in motivation (goal-directed behavior) without primary mood disturbance

Prevalence: 40–70%

Often confused with depression but important distinctions:

Assessment: Starkstein Apathy Scale, Lille Apathy Rating Scale

Treatment:


2.10 DEEP BRAIN STIMULATION (DBS) AND PSYCHIATRIC EFFECTS

DBS targets in PD:

Psychiatric Effects of DBS

Beneficial:

Adverse:


PART 3: HUNTINGTON'S DISEASE


3.1 GENETICS

Anticipation: CAG repeats tend to expand with each generation; especially with paternal transmission

Juvenile HD: >60 repeats; onset <20 years; rigid (Westphal variant, akinetic-rigid, not choreic); often inherited from affected father

Inheritance

3.2 CLINICAL FEATURES

Motor Features
Cognitive Decline

3.3 PSYCHIATRIC FEATURES: HIGH YIELD

Psychiatric symptoms may PRECEDE motor symptoms by years, often the initial presentation to psychiatry

Depression
Irritability and Aggression
Apathy
Obsessive-Compulsive Symptoms
Psychosis
Mania/Hypomania
Sexual Disinhibition

3.4 MANAGEMENT OF HD

Motor
Psychiatric
No Disease-Modifying Treatment Exists

Huntingtin-lowering strategies in trials:


3.5 GENETIC COUNSELING IN HD: ETHICAL ISSUES

Key ethical principles:

  1. Autonomy: Right to know vs right not to know
  2. Beneficence/Non-maleficence: Genetic testing can cause severe psychological distress
  3. Justice: Insurance discrimination implications
  4. Confidentiality: Family members at risk, duty to warn vs patient privacy conflict

Predictive Testing Protocol (HDSA guidelines):

  1. Pre-test counseling (minimum 2 sessions) by genetics counselor and psychiatrist
  2. Psychological assessment, exclude active suicidality, acute psychiatric illness
  3. Adequate support system confirmed
  4. Informed consent
  5. Support during and after test disclosure
  6. Long-term follow-up

Children: Testing asymptomatic children generally not recommended (no medical benefit in childhood; right not to know; cannot give informed consent)

Prenatal testing: Available, preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) allows selection of unaffected embryos without revealing parental status

Psychological impact of positive result:


PART 4: MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS & PSYCHIATRY


4.1 OVERVIEW

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic autoimmune demyelinating disease of the CNS.


4.2 DEPRESSION IN MS

Prevalence: 50% lifetime risk, highest of any neurological illness (compared by prevalence)

Why so high?

  1. Direct demyelination of limbic and frontal tracts
  2. Systemic immune dysregulation (pro-inflammatory cytokines depressogenic)
  3. Interferon-beta (IFN-β), disease-modifying therapy, causes depression in 20–30% (via IDO pathway, tryptophan depletion, cytokine-mediated)
  4. Psychosocial burden: unpredictable course, disability, uncertainty, loss
  5. Steroid-associated mood disturbance (used for relapses)

Clinical note: Interferon-induced depression is clinically important, monitor mood at each visit; switch to glatiramer acetate or natalizumab if depressive; SSRIs can be used prophylactically in vulnerable patients

Treatment:


4.3 PSEUDOBULBAR AFFECT (PBA)

Also called: Pathological laughing and crying, emotional lability, involuntary emotional expression disorder (IEED)

Prevalence in MS: 10%

Definition: Episodes of sudden, involuntary laughing or crying that are disproportionate to or inconsistent with the underlying emotional state

Key features:

Distinguish from:

Mechanism: Disruption of corticobulbar tracts (prefrontal brainstem/cerebellum circuits) loss of voluntary suppression of emotional expression

Treatment:


4.4 COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENT IN MS

Prevalence: 40–65% of MS patients

Pattern: Primarily affects:

Pattern is NOT Alzheimer's-like, language and simple attention relatively spared until late

Assessment tool: BICAMS (Brief International Cognitive Assessment for MS), 3 tests; SDMT, CVLT, BVMTR

Relationship to lesion load: Correlates with total lesion volume and brain atrophy (gray matter atrophy more predictive than white matter lesions)


4.5 EUPHORIA SCLEROTICA: MYTH vs REALITY

Historical concept: "Euphoria sclerotica", notion that MS patients experience inappropriate cheerfulness/euphoria

Current understanding:


PART 5: SLE & NEUROPSYCHIATRY


5.1 NEUROPSYCHIATRIC SLE (NPSLE)

Prevalence: 25–75% of SLE patients (depending on case definition)

ACR classification (1999): 19 specific NPSLE syndromes identified

5.1.1 NPSLE Syndromes: Classification

CNS Manifestations:

PNS Manifestations:


5.1.2 Psychiatric Manifestations of NPSLE

Psychosis:

Depression:

Cognitive Impairment:


5.1.3 Antiphospholipid Syndrome (APS) in SLE

Prevalence: ~30% of SLE patients have antiphospholipid antibodies

Clinical: Thrombosis (arterial and venous), obstetric complications, thrombocytopenia

Neuropsychiatric implications:


5.1.4 Steroid-Induced Psychiatric Effects

Steroids are commonly used in SLE, MS relapses, and other neurological conditions:

Effect · Description
Euphoria/hypomania Early, dose-dependent; high doses; first days
Depression More common with prolonged use, lower doses, or withdrawal
Psychosis Typically occurs within 2 weeks of starting; dose-dependent (rare <40 mg/day prednisone)
Anxiety Common
Insomnia Very common; take morning dose to minimize
Mania Full manic episodes with high-dose pulse steroids
Cognitive impairment With chronic use

Dose thresholds:

Management:


PART 6: AUTOIMMUNE ENCEPHALITIS


6.1 ANTI-NMDA RECEPTOR ENCEPHALITIS

Discovery: Dalmau et al., 2007, described in young women with ovarian teratomas and encephalitis

Epidemiology:

Clinical Phases

Phase 1 (Prodromal, first 2–5 days):

Phase 2 (Psychiatric, first 2 weeks):

Phase 3 (Neurological, weeks 2–4):

Phase 4 (Recovery, weeks to months):

Investigations
Pathophysiology

Anti-NMDAR antibodies (IgG targeting GluN1 subunit):

Treatment

First-line immunotherapy:

  1. High-dose IV methylprednisolone (1g/day × 5 days)
  2. IVIG (2g/kg over 5 days)
  3. Plasmapheresis (plasma exchange)

Second-line (if no response at 2–4 weeks):

  1. Rituximab (anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, B cell depletion)
  2. Cyclophosphamide

Tumor removal:

Supportive:

Prognosis:

Anti-NMDAR Encephalitis vs Schizophrenia: Distinguishing Features
FeatureAnti-NMDAR EncephalitisSchizophrenia
OnsetAcute (days-weeks)Insidious (months-years)
AgeOften <30, femaleOnset 18–25 (M), 25–35 (F)
FeverYes (prodrome)No
SeizuresYes (common)Rare
Movement disorderYes (orofacial dyskinesias, choreoathetosis)Absent (unless antipsychotic-related)
Autonomic instabilityYesNo
CSFPleocytosisNormal
EEGAbnormalUsually normal
MRIMay show limbic changesStructural changes (subtle)
ConsciousnessDecreased in later stagesIntact
AntibodiesAnti-NMDAR positiveAbsent

6.2 LGI1 (LEUCINE-RICH GLIOMA-INACTIVATED 1) ENCEPHALITIS

Demographics: Older men (60s–70s), unlike anti-NMDAR

Association: VGKC antibody complex (the LGI1 antibody was previously called "anti-VGKC")

No tumor association (unlike anti-NMDAR, teratoma)

Clinical Features:

Investigations:

Treatment:


6.3 OTHER AUTOIMMUNE ENCEPHALITIDES

AntibodyTargetDemographicsKey Feature
CASPR2Contactin-associated protein 2Older menMorvan syndrome (encephalopathy + PNS involvement + insomnia + autonomic); thymoma
AMPARAMPA receptorMiddle-aged womenLimbic encephalitis; breast/lung/thymoma; frequent relapses
GABABRGABA-B receptorMiddle-aged; association with small cell lung cancerSeizures prominent; limbic encephalitis
DPPXDipeptidyl-peptidase-like protein 6Middle-agedHyperekplexia (startle), diarrhea/weight loss, tremor, encephalopathy
Glycine receptorGlycine receptorChildren/young adultsProgressive encephalomyelitis with rigidity and myoclonus (PERM); stiff-person spectrum

PART 7: NEUROSYPHILIS


7.1 OVERVIEW

Treponema pallidum invades the CNS early in infection (within weeks), but most cases are cleared by immune response. Neurosyphilis develops when CNS invasion is not cleared.

Risk factors for neurosyphilis: HIV co-infection (dramatically increases risk, 7–10x), untreated/inadequately treated syphilis, immunosuppression


7.2 CLASSIFICATION OF NEUROSYPHILIS

7.2.1 Asymptomatic Neurosyphilis
7.2.2 Acute Syphilitic Meningitis
7.2.3 Meningovascular Syphilis
7.2.4 General Paresis of the Insane (GPI)

Onset: 15–20 years after primary infection

Pathology: Diffuse cortical involvement (meningoencephalitis with parenchymal damage)

Mnemonic: "PARESIS"

Psychiatric features (GPI):

7.2.5 Tabes Dorsalis

Onset: 15–25 years after primary infection

Pathology: Degeneration of posterior columns and dorsal nerve roots

Clinical features:

7.2.6 Argyll Robertson Pupil: High Yield

Contrast with Holmes-Adie pupil:

7.2.7 Diagnosis and Treatment

CSF in Neurosyphilis:

Treatment:


PART 8: PRION DISEASES


8.1 OVERVIEW

Prion diseases (Transmissible Spongiform Encephalopathies, TSEs) are rare, fatal neurodegenerative diseases caused by misfolded prion proteins (PrP^Sc) that convert normal cellular prion protein (PrP^C) to an abnormal form.

Key principle: No DNA or RNA, purely protein-mediated transmission

Spongiform change, vacuolation of neuropil (Swiss cheese appearance)


8.2 CREUTZFELDT-JAKOB DISEASE (CJD)

Sporadic CJD (sCJD): 85%

Epidemiology: 1–2 per million/year; median age onset 65 years

Course: Rapidly progressive dementia; death usually within 4–6 months (median 4 months)

Clinical features:

Investigations:

TestFindingNotes
MRI (DWI)Cortical ribboning + basal ganglia/thalamic hyperintensityMost sensitive, "Pulvinar sign" in vCJD
EEGPeriodic sharp wave complexes (PSWC), 1–2 Hz, biphasic or triphasicPresent in ~67% sCJD
CSF 14-3-3 proteinElevatedSensitive but not specific (also in encephalitis, stroke, paraneoplastic)
CSF RT-QuICHighly sensitive and specificGold standard for sCJD in CSF
Brain biopsyDefinitiveRarely performed; biohazard risk
Familial CJD (fCJD): 10–15%
Variant CJD (vCJD): Rare
Iatrogenic CJD

8.3 KURU


8.4 FATAL FAMILIAL INSOMNIA (FFI)

Clinical stages:

  1. Intractable insomnia + sympathetic hyperactivation (tachycardia, hyperhidrosis, hyperthermia, hypertension)
  2. Hallucinatory stupor (acted-out dreams)
  3. Complete insomnia + cognitive decline
  4. Unresponsive coma death

Duration: 7–25 months


PART 9: NEUROPSYCHIATRIC MANIFESTATIONS OF SYSTEMIC ILLNESS


9.1 RENAL FAILURE (UREMIC ENCEPHALOPATHY)

Mechanism: Accumulation of uremic toxins (guanidine compounds, indoles, phenols), disruption of neurotransmitter systems, fluid/electrolyte disturbances, hypertension

Clinical stages:

Dialysis-related psychiatric conditions:

  1. Dialysis Dementia: Now rare; caused by aluminium accumulation in dialysate; progressive aphasia dementia seizures death
  2. Dialysis Disequilibrium Syndrome: Occurs during/after dialysis; cerebral edema from rapid osmotic changes; headache, nausea, delirium, seizures
  3. Depression: Very common in dialysis patients (>25%)
  4. Anxiety and PTSD (related to dependence on machine, mortality awareness)

Psychotropics in renal failure:


9.2 HEPATIC FAILURE (HEPATIC ENCEPHALOPATHY)

Mechanism: Ammonia + other toxic metabolites (GABA agonists, false neurotransmitters, inflammatory cytokines) crossing BBB neuroinflammation + altered neurotransmission

West Haven Criteria (grading):

Grade · Features
Grade 0 (MHE, minimal) No clinical symptoms; impaired on psychometric testing only
Grade I Mild confusion, euphoria/anxiety, impaired attention, sleep disturbance
Grade II Lethargy, disorientation (time), personality change, asterixis present
Grade III Somnolent but arousable, gross disorientation, bizarre behavior, asterixis
Grade IV Coma (unresponsive)

Treatment: Lactulose, rifaximin, treat underlying cause, TIPS (transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt) for refractory

Psychotropics in liver failure:


9.3 RESPIRATORY FAILURE (HYPOXIC AND HYPERCAPNIC ENCEPHALOPATHY)

Hypoxic Encephalopathy
Hypercapnic Encephalopathy (CO2 Narcosis)
Sleep-Disordered Breathing (OSA) and Psychiatry

9.4 THYROID AND PSYCHIATRIC CONDITIONS (Brief: Main Topic in NB-07)

Condition · Psychiatric Features
Hypothyroidism Depression (most common), cognitive slowing, psychosis ("myxedema madness")
Hyperthyroidism Anxiety (most common), agitation, mania, psychosis, emotional lability
Hashimoto's encephalopathy Autoimmune encephalopathy; psychosis, seizures, dementia; steroids responsive; anti-TPO antibodies

9.5 WERNICKE'S ENCEPHALOPATHY AND KORSAKOFF'S SYNDROME (Neuropsychiatric intersection)

Etiology: Thiamine (B1) deficiency

High-risk groups: Chronic alcohol use disorder, malnutrition, prolonged vomiting (hyperemesis, chemotherapy), bariatric surgery

Wernicke's Encephalopathy (Acute)

Classic Triad:

  1. Confusion/delirium (80%, most common)
  2. Oculomotor abnormalities (nystagmus, lateral gaze palsy, complete ophthalmoplegia), 25%
  3. Ataxia (gait ataxia), 23%

Full triad only in 16%, treat empirically with thiamine in any at-risk patient

Pathology: Bilateral petechial hemorrhages in:

Treatment: IV thiamine BEFORE glucose (glucose administration can precipitate acute WE in thiamine-deficient patients)

Korsakoff's Syndrome (Chronic)

Features:

  1. Severe anterograde amnesia (cannot form new memories)
  2. Retrograde amnesia (gap increases toward present, with temporal gradient)
  3. Confabulation, unintentional (not deliberate lying), fills memory gaps with fabricated content
  4. Relatively preserved immediate memory and remote memory
  5. Anosognosia, lack of awareness of memory deficits

Prognosis: 20–25% recovery with treatment, 50% partial improvement, 25% permanent (irreversible)

Treatment: High-dose thiamine replacement; address alcohol dependence


9.6 ANTI-NMDAR ENCEPHALITIS: PSYCHIATRIC MIMICRY (Recap)

The most important message for psychiatric exams regarding autoimmune encephalitis:

Clinical pearls:

  1. Any young woman with rapid-onset psychiatric symptoms + seizures + movement disorder = anti-NMDAR encephalitis until proven otherwise
  2. These patients appear psychiatric at first, admitted to psychiatry wards, given antipsychotics, often not investigated adequately
  3. CSF analysis and anti-NMDAR antibodies must be checked before diagnosing a "first psychotic episode" in atypical presentations
  4. Red flags for organic psychosis: Fever, seizures, movement disorders, autonomic instability, decreased consciousness, rapid cognitive decline, age/sex atypicalities

9.7 WILSON'S DISEASE: NEUROPSYCHIATRIC MANIFESTATIONS

Genetics: ATP7B gene mutation (copper transporter); autosomal recessive; chromosome 13

Pathophysiology: Copper accumulates in liver, brain (lenticular nucleus), cornea (Kayser-Fleischer rings)

Neuropsychiatric features (50% of Wilson's present with neuropsychiatric symptoms):

Neurological features:

Kayser-Fleischer rings: Golden-brown deposits at Descemet's membrane of cornea; slit-lamp examination; present in >99% neurological Wilson's

Diagnosis:

Treatment:


SUMMARY TABLE: NEUROPSYCHIATRIC SYNDROMES BY PATHOLOGY TYPE

CategoryPrototypeKey Psychiatric FeatureKey Investigation
HIVHAND/HADSubcortical dementiaIHDS, neurocognitive battery
Infectious OIToxoplasmosisAltered behavior from raised ICPMRI (ring-enhancing), Toxo IgG
AutoimmuneAnti-NMDARPsychosis first, then neuroCSF anti-NMDAR antibodies
Autoimmune (SLE)NPSLEPsychosis/depressionAnti-dsDNA, complement, APS antibodies
DegenerativePD + dementiaSubcortical dementia + psychosisDaTSCAN, clinical criteria
GeneticHDDepression + irritabilityCAG repeat testing
DemyelinatingMSDepression + cognitiveMRI, evoked potentials
SpirochetalGPIGrandiose delusions + dementiaCSF VDRL, FTA-ABS
PrionCJDRapidly progressive dementiaMRI DWI, 14-3-3, RT-QuIC
MetabolicHepatic encephalopathyDelirium + asterixisAmmonia, liver function
DeficiencyKorsakoffAnterograde amnesia + confabulationThiamine, MRI mammillary bodies
Heavy metalWilson'sPersonality change + psychosisCeruloplasmin, KF rings

Chapter 02

Model Answers


HIV, Parkinson's Disease & Other Neuropsychiatry

Key Insight

Format guide: Each answer follows the standard long-answer structure used in MD Psychiatry examinations. Marks allocated as indicated. Answers written for a 10-mark question unless otherwise noted.


MODEL ANSWER 01

Q: Describe HIV-Associated Neurocognitive Disorders (HAND). Discuss the staging, pathophysiology, assessment, and management. (10 marks)

Key Insight

Exam Pearl, HAND is asked frequently in Paper IV. The Antinori classification and IHDS scoring must be memorised verbatim.


Introduction

HIV-Associated Neurocognitive Disorders (HAND) is an umbrella term for a spectrum of neurocognitive impairment that occurs directly as a consequence of HIV infection of the central nervous system. It was formally classified by Antinori et al. in 2007. With the advent of combination antiretroviral therapy (cART), the prevalence of severe HIV-Associated Dementia (HAD) has declined from 25–30% to approximately 2–8%, while milder forms (ANI, MND) now predominate.


1. Classification and Staging (3 marks)

The three-tier HAND classification (Antinori 2007):

CategoryNeuropsychological CriteriaFunctional Impact
ANI (Asymptomatic Neurocognitive Impairment)≥2 cognitive domains, ≥1 SD below normative meanNone, asymptomatic
MND (Mild Neurocognitive Disorder)≥2 cognitive domains impairedMild, IADL affected
HAD (HIV-Associated Dementia)Marked impairment across domainsSevere, ADL affected

Six cognitive domains are assessed: learning/memory, attention/working memory, executive function, speed of information processing, language, and motor skills. Psychomotor slowing is the hallmark.

HAND is a subcortical dementia, retrieval deficits (not encoding failure), personality change, slowed processing. Contrast with Alzheimer's (cortical, aphasia, apraxia, agnosia).


2. Pathophysiology (3 marks)

HIV does not directly infect neurons (neurons lack CD4 receptors). Neurotoxicity occurs through:

a) Viral protein neurotoxicity:

b) Macrophage/microglia-mediated injury:

c) Persistent immune activation:


3. Assessment, IHDS (2 marks)

The International HIV Dementia Scale (IHDS) is the standard bedside tool:

ComponentTestMax Score
Motor speedAlternating finger tapping (5 sec)4
Psychomotor speedSequential hand movements4
Memory4-word recall at 2 minutes4
Total12

Cutoff: ≤10 suggests HAD (sensitivity 74%, specificity 54%).

For milder forms (ANI/MND), formal neuropsychological battery is required. Screening tools: MoCA, HDS.


4. Management (2 marks)

a) ART optimisation:

b) Symptomatic management:

c) Treating OI:

d) Psychosocial:


Key Insight

Clinical Anchor, HAND is primarily a treatable condition. Viral suppression via ART is the single most effective intervention. Neuropsychiatric symptoms that persist despite viral suppression require separate management.


MODEL ANSWER 02

Q: A 32-year-old woman is admitted to a psychiatric ward with acute onset of auditory hallucinations, agitation, and bizarre behaviour over 10 days. She has no prior psychiatric history. Discuss the differential diagnosis and management, with special emphasis on autoimmune encephalitis. (10 marks)

Key Insight

Exam Strategy, This is a classic anti-NMDAR encephalitis vignette. The examiner is testing whether you flag organic aetiology in a "first psychotic episode." Structure: organic vs primary, red flags, investigations, treatment.


Introduction

Acute-onset psychiatric symptoms in a young woman without prior psychiatric history must be evaluated systematically for organic aetiology before diagnosing primary psychotic illness. Anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis is the most common autoimmune encephalitis and characteristically presents to psychiatry first.


1. Differential Diagnosis (3 marks)

Category · Diagnoses
Autoimmune Anti-NMDAR encephalitis, LGI1 encephalitis, GABABR encephalitis
Infectious Viral encephalitis (HSV, temporal lobe), HIV encephalopathy, neurosyphilis
Metabolic Hepatic/uraemic encephalopathy, Wernicke's, thyroid (Hashimoto's)
Neoplastic Paraneoplastic encephalitis, CNS lymphoma
Primary psychiatric First-episode schizophrenia, brief psychotic disorder, bipolar I with psychosis

Red flags for organic cause:


2. Anti-NMDAR Encephalitis, Clinical Profile (3 marks)

Anti-NMDAR encephalitis (Dalmau et al., 2007) is caused by IgG antibodies against the GluN1 subunit of the NMDA receptor.

Clinical phases:

Phase 1 (Prodromal, days 1–5): Viral prodrome, fever, headache

Phase 2 (Psychiatric, weeks 1–2):

Phase 3 (Neurological, weeks 2–4):

Phase 4 (Recovery): Gradual improvement over months

Epidemiology: Young women; ovarian teratoma in 50–60% of female cases; can occur without teratoma (children, males)


3. Investigations (2 marks)

Investigation · Expected Finding
CSF Lymphocytic pleocytosis (60%), elevated protein
CSF anti-NMDAR antibodies Positive, gold standard (more sensitive than serum)
EEG Diffuse slowing; "extreme delta brush" (highly specific, 30%)
MRI brain Often normal; may show limbic T2/FLAIR hyperintensity
Pelvic ultrasound/CT Ovarian teratoma, mandatory in all women
Serum anti-NMDAR Less sensitive than CSF

4. Management (2 marks)

A. Immediate:

B. First-line immunotherapy (simultaneously):

C. Second-line (if no response at 2–4 weeks):

D. Tumour removal:

Prognosis: >80% substantial recovery with treatment; 20–25% relapse.


Key Insight

Exam Pearl, Never diagnose first-episode schizophrenia in a young woman without checking CSF anti-NMDAR antibodies. The psychiatric phase can last weeks before neurological signs emerge.


MODEL ANSWER 03

Q: Discuss the psychiatric manifestations of Huntington's disease. Describe genetic counselling and ethical issues in predictive testing. (10 marks)


Introduction

Huntington's disease (HD) is an autosomal dominant neurodegenerative disorder caused by a CAG trinucleotide repeat expansion (≥40 repeats) in the HTT gene on chromosome 4p16.3. Psychiatric symptoms are often the earliest and most distressing manifestations, they may precede motor symptoms by years and significantly contribute to the disease burden.


1. Psychiatric Manifestations (5 marks)

a) Depression (30–40%):

b) Irritability and Aggression (most common across all stages):

c) Apathy (40–70%):

d) Obsessive-Compulsive Symptoms:

e) Psychosis (~10%):

f) Cognitive Decline:

g) Sleep Disturbance:


2. Genetic Counselling and Ethical Issues (5 marks)

A. Predictive Testing Protocol (HDSA/EHD Guidelines):

Predictive testing for HD is ethically complex because:

Standard protocol (minimum):

  1. Pre-test counselling, at least 2 sessions with genetics counsellor and psychiatrist
  2. Psychological assessment, exclude active suicidality, acute psychiatric illness
  3. Support system confirmation, who will be present at disclosure?
  4. Informed consent, voluntary, understanding of implications
  5. Result disclosure, face-to-face, with support
  6. Long-term psychological follow-up

B. Key Ethical Principles:

Principle · Application
Autonomy Right to know vs right NOT to know, both must be respected
Beneficence Knowing allows life planning; uncertainty has its own harm
Non-maleficence Positive result can precipitate severe depression and suicide
Justice Insurance/employment discrimination concerns
Confidentiality Results are private, but family members share the risk

C. Special Populations:

Children:

Prenatal testing:

D. Psychological Responses to Positive Result:


Key Insight

Clinical Anchor, HD genetic counselling is a model for responsible predictive genetic testing. The psychiatric team's role is not to discourage testing but to ensure the person is psychologically prepared and supported throughout.


MODEL ANSWER 04

Q: Discuss psychosis in Parkinson's disease: clinical features, pathophysiology, and management. (8 marks)


Introduction

Psychosis affects 20–40% of Parkinson's disease (PD) patients over the disease course and represents one of the most challenging neuropsychiatric complications. It is a leading cause of caregiver burden and nursing home placement.


1. Clinical Features (3 marks)

PD psychosis presents on a spectrum:

Minor phenomena (early, benign):

Major phenomena (later, problematic):

Key clinical point: Unlike primary psychosis (schizophrenia), PD hallucinations typically occur in clear consciousness with intact insight initially.


2. Pathophysiology (2 marks)


3. Risk Factors


4. Management, Step-Wise (3 marks)

Step 1, Address reversible causes:

Reduce/discontinue medications in order of decreasing risk:

Anticholinergics Amantadine MAO-B inhibitors Dopamine agonists COMT inhibitors Reduce levodopa (last resort)

Treat: UTI, constipation, pain, dehydration (frequent triggers in elderly)

Optimise: Sleep, correct visual impairment

Step 2, Antipsychotic selection:

DrugStatusNotes
ClozapineGOLD STANDARD6.25–50 mg; does not worsen motor symptoms; requires WBC monitoring
QuetiapineMost usedWeak evidence vs clozapine; no WBC monitoring needed
PimavanserinFDA-approved 20165-HT2A inverse agonist; NO dopamine blockade; no motor worsening; not available in India
OlanzapineCONTRAINDICATEDSignificantly worsens motor symptoms
Risperidone, haloperidolAVOIDHigh D2 blockade severe motor worsening

Clozapine mechanism in PD: High affinity for D4 receptors, minimal D2 affinity antipsychotic effect without blocking the dopamine required for motor function


Key Insight

Exam Pearl, In PD psychosis: Clozapine is first-line in guidelines; quetiapine is most commonly prescribed in practice (due to no WBC monitoring requirement). Know both. Pimavanserin is the exam buzzword for its mechanism (5-HT2A inverse agonist, no D2 antagonism).


MODEL ANSWER 05

Q: Describe the psychiatric manifestations of multiple sclerosis. Discuss pseudobulbar affect in detail. (8 marks)


Introduction

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic autoimmune demyelinating CNS disease with extensive neuropsychiatric manifestations. The lifetime prevalence of significant psychiatric disorder in MS exceeds that of any other neurological condition.


1. Psychiatric Manifestations of MS (4 marks)

a) Depression (50% lifetime prevalence):

b) Anxiety (36%):

c) Cognitive Impairment (40–65%):

d) Pseudobulbar Affect (10%): (detailed below)

e) Fatigue (90%):

f) Euphoria Sclerotica (historically described, largely a myth):


2. Pseudobulbar Affect (PBA) (4 marks)

Definition:

PBA (also: pathological laughing and crying, involuntary emotional expression disorder, IEED) is a neurological condition characterised by sudden, involuntary, uncontrollable episodes of laughing or crying that are disproportionate to, or inconsistent with, the underlying emotional state.

Key distinguishing features:

Prevalence in neurological conditions:

MS (10%), ALS/MND (50%), stroke (20%), TBI, PD, HD

Pathophysiology:

Disruption of corticobulbar (corticopontocerebellar) pathways, prefrontal cortex normally inhibits brainstem emotional expression circuits. Demyelination of these pathways in MS release of brainstem from cortical inhibition involuntary emotional expression

Differentiation from depression:

FeaturePBADepression
TriggerMinor stimuliGeneralised negative affect
Duration of episodeSeconds to minutesHours/days
Emotional congruenceIncongruentCongruent
Distress during episodeEmbarrassmentSadness
CourseEpisodicSustained

Differentiation from BPD/mania:

Treatment:


Key Insight

Exam Pearl, PBA is a motor-expressive disorder, not a mood disorder. The patient is not experiencing the emotion they are expressing, they are horrified by their inability to control it. This distinction explains why SSRIs work fast (not waiting for mood change, modulating the emotional expression circuit).


MODEL ANSWER 06

Q: Discuss the neuropsychiatric manifestations of SLE. What is the role of antiphospholipid antibodies? (8 marks)


Introduction

Neuropsychiatric SLE (NPSLE) encompasses 19 distinct syndromes (ACR 1999 classification) affecting both the CNS and PNS. The prevalence of NPSLE is 25–75% depending on case definitions, making neuropsychiatric complications among the most significant contributors to SLE morbidity.


1. NPSLE Classification and Key Manifestations (3 marks)

Central Nervous System:

Peripheral Nervous System:


2. Psychiatric Manifestations in Detail (3 marks)

Psychosis:

FeatureSLE PsychosisSteroid Psychosis
SerologyElevated anti-dsDNA, low C3/C4Normal
ImagingNPSLE changes on MRIOften normal
Relation to steroidsImproves with immunosuppressionDose-dependent; improves with dose reduction
OnsetGradualWithin days of starting/increasing

Depression:

Cognitive Impairment:


3. Antiphospholipid Syndrome (APS) and Neuropsychiatric Implications (2 marks)

APS occurs in ~30% of SLE patients. It involves antibodies (anticardiolipin, anti-β2-glycoprotein I, lupus anticoagulant) that cause thrombosis and pregnancy complications.

Neuropsychiatric consequences of APS:

Mechanism of psychiatric symptoms:

Treatment: Anticoagulation (warfarin, target INR 2–3 for thrombotic APS), hydroxychloroquine (protective effect on APS), immunosuppression for active SLE


MODEL ANSWER 07

Q: Describe neurosyphilis: classification, clinical features of General Paresis of the Insane, and treatment. (8 marks)


Introduction

Neurosyphilis refers to infection of the CNS by Treponema pallidum. While largely preventable with early penicillin treatment, it remains clinically relevant, particularly in HIV co-infected individuals, where the risk is 7–10 times higher and progression more rapid.


1. Classification of Neurosyphilis (2 marks)

TypeTiming After Primary InfectionKey Feature
AsymptomaticAny timeCSF abnormalities only
Acute syphilitic meningitis<2 yearsMeningitis, CN palsies (II, VII, VIII)
Meningovascular5–12 yearsCerebral endarteritis ischaemic strokes
General Paresis of Insane (GPI)15–20 yearsDiffuse meningoencephalitis dementia
Tabes Dorsalis15–25 yearsPosterior column degeneration

2. General Paresis of the Insane (GPI) (3 marks)

GPI results from diffuse spirochetal invasion of cortical parenchyma, causing progressive encephalopathy with prominent psychiatric and cognitive features.

Mnemonic: PARESIS

Psychiatric features:

Argyll Robertson Pupil:


3. Diagnosis (1 mark)


4. Treatment (2 marks)


MODEL ANSWER 08

Q: Discuss Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease: clinical features, diagnosis, and types. (6 marks)


Introduction

Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD) is the most common human prion disease, belonging to the group of Transmissible Spongiform Encephalopathies (TSEs). It is caused by misfolded prion proteins (PrP^Sc) that propagate by converting normal cellular prion protein (PrP^C). The defining neuropathological feature is spongiform vacuolation of the neuropil.


1. Types of CJD (2 marks)

TypeProportionMechanismKey Feature
Sporadic (sCJD)85%Somatic PRNP mutation or spontaneous misfoldingMost common; elderly; rapid course
Familial (fCJD)10–15%Germline PRNP mutationAutosomal dominant; includes GSS, FFI
Iatrogenic<1%Contaminated surgical instruments, dura mater, growth hormoneIncubation years to decades
Variant (vCJD)<1%BSE transmission via contaminated beefYoung adults; psychiatric onset; pulvinar sign

2. Clinical Features, Sporadic CJD (2 marks)

Variant CJD distinguishing features:


3. Diagnosis (2 marks)

InvestigationFindingNotes
MRI (DWI)Cortical ribboning + basal ganglia/thalamic hyperintensityMost sensitive, best early test
Pulvinar sign (MRI)T2 hyperintensity in posterior thalamusHighly suggestive of variant CJD
EEGPeriodic sharp wave complexes (PSWC) at 1–2 HzPresent in 67% sCJD; not present in vCJD
CSF 14-3-3 proteinElevatedSensitive; not specific (also in encephalitis, stroke)
CSF RT-QuICPositiveBest specificity for sCJD, gold standard non-invasive
Tonsillar biopsyPrP^Sc in lymphoid tissueDiagnostic for vCJD ante-mortem
Brain biopsySpongiform change, PrP depositsDefinitive; rarely needed; biohazard

WHO Diagnostic Criteria (sCJD):


Key Insight

Exam Pearl, For CJD: MRI DWI is the most sensitive imaging; RT-QuIC is the most specific CSF test; 14-3-3 is sensitive but not specific. EEG PSWC is seen in sCJD but NOT in vCJD (use pulvinar sign for vCJD).


MODEL ANSWER 09

Q: Discuss impulse control disorders in Parkinson's disease. What is dopamine dysregulation syndrome? (6 marks)


Introduction

Impulse Control Disorders (ICDs) are a significant and under-recognised complication of dopamine agonist therapy in Parkinson's disease. The DOMINION study (Weintraub, 2010) found a prevalence of 13.6% in PD patients on dopamine agonists, representing a major quality-of-life and safety concern.


1. Types of ICD in PD (2 marks)


2. Mechanism (2 marks)

ICDs in PD are caused by overstimulation of the mesolimbic (reward) dopamine pathway by dopamine agonists.

Key pharmacological concept: Dopamine agonists (pramipexole, ropinirole, rotigotine) have preferential affinity for D3 receptors located in the ventral striatum (nucleus accumbens, reward circuitry). The dorsal striatum (motor function) may be appropriately medicated, but the ventral striatum (reward/impulsivity) becomes over-dosed.

Risk factors:


3. Dopamine Dysregulation Syndrome (DDS) (2 marks)

DDS is distinct from ICD, it represents an addiction to dopaminergic medication itself.

Core features:

Mechanism: The OFF state dysphoria (low dopamine) creates a negative reinforcement loop patient takes more medication to relieve dysphoria creates over-ON states with euphoria positive reinforcement

Risk factors: Prior substance use disorder, impulsive personality traits, younger onset PD

Management:


Key Insight

Clinical Anchor, Always screen for ICD when starting dopamine agonists. Use the QUIP questionnaire (Questionnaire for Impulsive-Compulsive Disorders in PD). If ICD develops, reduce/stop agonist before adding psychiatric medication.


MODEL ANSWER 10

Q: Describe the neuropsychiatric manifestations of renal failure. Discuss special considerations for prescribing psychotropics in renal impairment. (6 marks)


Introduction

Renal failure produces neuropsychiatric manifestations through accumulation of uremic toxins, electrolyte disturbances, fluid shifts, and co-occurring psychological burden of chronic illness. The spectrum ranges from subtle personality changes in mild uremia to delirium and coma in acute severe uraemia.


1. Neuropsychiatric Manifestations (3 marks)

Uremic Encephalopathy (graded by severity):

Dialysis-Related Neuropsychiatric Conditions:

Condition · Description
Dialysis Dementia Now rare; aluminium accumulation in dialysate; progressive aphasia dementia myoclonus seizures
Dialysis Disequilibrium Syndrome During/after dialysis; cerebral oedema from rapid osmotic changes; headache, nausea, delirium, seizures
Depression >25% of dialysis patients; poor QOL, increased mortality; underdiagnosed
Anxiety and death anxiety Anticipatory anxiety about session, fear of machine failure, mortality awareness

Psychological burden:


2. Psychotropic Prescribing in Renal Impairment (3 marks)

Drugs to AVOID or use with extreme caution:

Drug · Reason
Lithium Renally cleared; accumulates; nephrotoxic; AVOID in CKD
Gabapentin/Pregabalin Renally cleared; require dose reduction or avoidance in GFR <30
Amisulpride Renally cleared; accumulates
Risperidone Renal clearance of active metabolite 9-hydroxyrisperidone; reduce dose
NSAIDS (for pain) Nephrotoxic; worsen CKD

Relatively safe (hepatic metabolism):

General principles:


MODEL ANSWER 11

Q: Discuss depression in HIV. How does it differ clinically from primary MDD and how should it be treated? (6 marks)


Introduction

Depression is the most common psychiatric comorbidity in HIV, with a prevalence of 30–60%, three to four times higher than the general population. Its management has direct implications for ART adherence, viral suppression, and overall HIV outcomes.


1. Aetiology of Depression in HIV (2 marks)

Multiple converging mechanisms:


2. Clinical Differences from Primary MDD (2 marks)

FeatureHIV-Associated DepressionPrimary MDD
Somatic symptomsOverlap with HIV illness, less diagnostic valueMore diagnostically useful
Guilt/worthlessnessMay relate to HIV risk behaviours specificallyGeneral self-criticism
Suicidal ideationPresent; often related to illness prognosisPresent; ideation + plan
Cognitive complaintsOverlap with HANDNot routinely present
Efavirenz side effectsSpecific, vivid dreams, depressed moodNot applicable
ART adherence impactDepression severely reduces adherenceNot applicable

Assessment recommendation: Prioritise psychological/cognitive criteria (hopelessness, worthlessness, anhedonia, poor concentration) over somatic criteria when assessing depression in HIV. PHQ-9 and MADRS are preferred.


3. Treatment (2 marks)

Pharmacological:

Psychotherapy:

Key clinical point: Treating depression in HIV is not just about mood, it directly improves ART adherence. An OR of 3.4 for non-adherence has been associated with untreated depression. This makes depression treatment a priority in HIV management, not an afterthought.


MODEL ANSWER 12

Q: Write short notes on: (a) Efavirenz and neuropsychiatric side effects, (b) HIV testing and counselling. (5 marks each)


a) Efavirenz and Neuropsychiatric Side Effects (5 marks)

Introduction:

Efavirenz (EFV) is a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) that was for many years the backbone of first-line ART. Despite its efficacy, neuropsychiatric side effects occur in 40–52% of patients, making it one of the most neuropsychiatrically active ART drugs.

Mechanism:

Neuropsychiatric effects:

Time course:

Management:


b) HIV Testing and Counselling (5 marks)

Principles:

HIV testing and counselling (HTC) follows the 5 Cs: Consent, Confidentiality, Counselling, Correct results, Connection (to care).

Types of HTC:

TypeSettingApproach
VCT (Voluntary Counselling and Testing)Community, ICTCPatient-initiated, opt-in
PITC (Provider-Initiated Testing and Counselling)TB clinic, ANC, STI clinicRoutine opt-out testing by provider
Home-based testingCommunity outreachLay counsellors
Self-testingHome, pharmacyEmerging approach

Components of VCT:

Pre-test counselling:

HIV Testing:

Post-test counselling:

Negative result:

Positive result:

Special populations:


MODEL ANSWER 13

Q: Discuss the psychiatric features of Wilson's disease and its relevance to psychiatry. (5 marks)


Introduction

Wilson's disease (hepatolenticular degeneration) is an autosomal recessive disorder of copper metabolism (ATP7B gene, chromosome 13) causing copper accumulation in liver, brain (lenticular nucleus), and cornea. It is clinically significant to psychiatry because 50% of patients present with neuropsychiatric symptoms, and psychiatric presentations can precede hepatic or neurological signs by years.


1. Psychiatric Features (3 marks)

FeaturePrevalenceNotes
Personality changeMost common early featureDisinhibition, impulsivity, loss of social graces; may be mistaken for adjustment disorder or personality disorder
Depression30–40%Can be the sole initial presentation; standard antidepressants used but treat underlying Wilson's
Psychosis~10%Resembles schizophrenia; visual and auditory hallucinations, paranoid delusions
AnxietyCommonGeneralised; may accompany depression
OCD-like symptomsPresentRepetitive, perseverative behaviours
Cognitive declineLate stageExecutive dysfunction; may progress to dementia
Emotional labilityCommonIrritability, laughing/crying spells

Clinical trap: Psychiatric presentation of Wilson's disease in a young person is frequently misdiagnosed as primary psychiatric illness (schizophrenia, BPD, or mood disorder). Antipsychotics or antidepressants may be started without investigating the underlying cause. This delays copper-chelation therapy and allows irreversible neurological damage.


2. When to Suspect Wilson's Disease in a Psychiatric Patient (1 mark)


3. Diagnosis and Treatment (1 mark)

Treatment:


MODEL ANSWER 14

Q: Describe the management of depression in Parkinson's disease. (5 marks)


Introduction

Depression affects 40–50% of Parkinson's disease patients and is the most common neuropsychiatric symptom of PD. It is not simply reactive, it has a specific neurobiological substrate involving degeneration of noradrenergic (locus coeruleus) and serotonergic (raphe nuclei) systems, often preceding motor symptoms by years.


1. Assessment (1 mark)


2. Pharmacological Management (3 marks)

A. SSRIs (first-line):

B. SNRIs:

C. TCAs:

D. Dopaminergic approach:

E. ECT:


3. Non-Pharmacological Management (1 mark)


Key Insight

Exam Pearl, ECT in PD: improves both depression AND motor symptoms. This is a two-for-one that appears in exams. The motor effect of ECT in PD is temporary (weeks) but dramatic.


MODEL ANSWER 15

Q: Write a short note on Hepatic Encephalopathy: psychiatric aspects and prescribing considerations. (5 marks)


Introduction

Hepatic encephalopathy (HE) is a spectrum of neuropsychiatric dysfunction arising from hepatic failure, characterised by accumulation of ammonia and other neuro-toxic substances, activation of GABA-ergic pathways, and neuroinflammation.


1. Neuropsychiatric Manifestations (2 marks)

West Haven Criteria:

Grade · Features
0 (Minimal/Covert HE) No clinical symptoms; impaired on psychometric testing only (CFF, PHES)
I Mild confusion, anxiety/euphoria, impaired attention, reversal of sleep-wake cycle
II Lethargy, disorientation in time, personality change, asterixis present
III Somnolent but arousable, gross disorientation (time + place), bizarre behaviour
IV Coma (unresponsive to verbal/painful stimuli)

Psychiatric presentations of HE:


2. Mechanism (1 mark)


3. Psychotropic Prescribing in Liver Failure (2 marks)

Drugs to AVOID:

Relatively safe:

General approach:


Chapter 03

Mnemonics & Memory Tricks


HIV, Parkinson's Disease & Other Neuropsychiatry

Key Insight

Design note: Each mnemonic block includes: the device, what each letter stands for, a clinical anchor sentence, and a quick recall test prompt.


MNEMONIC 01: HAND Classification

"ANI Makes Dementia"

Progression of HAND across three stages

StageFull NameFunctional Impact
A, ANIAsymptomatic Neurocognitive ImpairmentNone
M, MNDMild Neurocognitive DisorderMild, IADL
D, HADHIV-Associated DementiaSevere, ADL
Key Insight

Anchor: ANI MND HAD. Each step adds functional impairment. The distinction is not the test score, it's whether the patient can manage their own affairs.

Quick test: What two features distinguish MND from ANI? (Answer: Same cognitive impairment, but MND has MILD functional impairment of IADLs)


MNEMONIC 02: IHDS Components

"Tap, Tap, Remember" (TTR)

Three components of the International HIV Dementia Scale

Score · Interpretation
Max = 12 Normal
≤10 Suggests HAD
Key Insight

Anchor: Each component max = 4. Sensitivity 74%, specificity 54%. Good bedside tool, misses ANI/MND.


MNEMONIC 03: Opportunistic Infections in HIV by CD4 Count

"Terrible PCP Comes, MACs Attack"

CD4 thresholds for major OIs, descending order

CD4 Count · OI
<500 Recurrent bacterial pneumonias, Candida (oral/vaginal), HSV recurrences
<200 PCP (Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia), Toxoplasmosis (brain)
<100 Cryptococcal meningitis, Toxoplasmosis (most cases)
<50 CMV (retinitis, encephalitis), MAC (M. avium complex)

Full mnemonic expansion:

Key Insight

Anchor: The CD4 thresholds are the most commonly asked HIV factoid in exams. 200 = PCP cutoff (primary prophylaxis threshold); 100 = Cryptococcus/Toxo; 50 = CMV/MAC.


MNEMONIC 04: Efavirenz CNS Side Effects

"DAMN VIVID"

Neuropsychiatric side effects of Efavirenz

Key Insight

Anchor: DAMN VIVID captures the phenomenological richness of EFV CNS effects. Remember: worst in first 2–4 weeks, improve by 6–8 weeks. Take at night. Switch to dolutegravir if persistent.


MNEMONIC 05: Antipsychotics in Parkinson's Disease

"Can Quetiapine Please? Olanzapine Ruins Haloperidol"

C-Q-P vs O-R-H: Safe vs Unsafe

SAFE:

UNSAFE:

Key Insight

Anchor: The "safe" trio are all low-D2 or non-D2 drugs. The "unsafe" trio have significant D2 blockade. In PD, D2 blockade = motor catastrophe.

Quick test: What is the mechanism of pimavanserin that makes it safe in PD? (Answer: Selective 5-HT2A inverse agonist, no dopamine antagonism whatsoever)


MNEMONIC 06: General Paresis of the Insane

"PARESIS"

Classic mnemonic for features of GPI (neurosyphilis)

Key Insight

Anchor: GPI = 15–20 years post-primary infection. Psychiatric features dominate early. Grandiose delusions (Napoleon, God) are classic teaching but depression is actually more common in modern series.


MNEMONIC 07: Argyll Robertson Pupil vs Holmes-Adie

"AR: Accommodates, Refuses light"

"HA: Has Atony (responds slowly)"

FeatureAR PupilHolmes-Adie
SizeSmall, irregularLarge, dilated
Light reflexABSENTSlow tonic (present but sluggish)
AccommodationPRESENTPresent (tonic, slow)
CauseNeurosyphilis (classic), midbrain lesionBenign; postganglionic ciliary nerve
Other signsNeurosyphilis featuresAbsent knee/ankle jerks
Key Insight

Anchor memory trick: "AR, Accommodates but Refuses light" vs "HA, Has atony (slow light response)." The AR pupil is the exam question; Holmes-Adie is the distractor.


MNEMONIC 08: Huntington's Disease Genetics

"40-40 Rule and CAG Anticipation"

HD genetics in one frame

Repeat Count · Meaning
≤26 Normal
27–35 Intermediate (not HD, may expand in offspring)
36–39 Reduced penetrance (some develop HD)
≥40 Full penetrance, will develop HD
>60 Juvenile HD (Westphal variant, rigid, not choreic)

The 40-40 Rule: ≥40 repeats 100% penetrance | Juvenile HD >60 repeats

Anticipation: CAG repeats expand each generation, especially with paternal transmission.

Key Insight

Anchor: Autosomal dominant, chromosome 4p16.3. Each child of an affected parent has 50% risk. Suicide rate 4–7× general population, particularly in post-diagnosis period and early motor phase.


MNEMONIC 09: Anti-NMDAR Encephalitis Clinical Phases

"Prodrome Psych Neuro Recovery" = "Pretty Psychiatrists Never Recover"

(Self-deprecating but memorable)

PhaseTimingFeatures
P, ProdromeDays 1–5Fever, headache, viral-like illness
P, PsychiatricWeeks 1–2Psychosis, agitation, bizarre behaviour, presents to psychiatry
N, NeurologicalWeeks 2–4Seizures, orofacial dyskinesias, autonomic instability, decreased consciousness
R, RecoveryWeeks–monthsGradual improvement with immunotherapy
Key Insight

Anchor: The psychiatric phase is THE TRAP. Young woman + acute psychosis + no prior history = send CSF for anti-NMDAR antibodies before diagnosing schizophrenia. Orofacial dyskinesias + autonomic instability = hallmark of the neurological phase.

Quick test: What is the EEG finding highly specific for anti-NMDAR encephalitis? (Answer: Extreme delta brush, present in ~30%)


MNEMONIC 10: Cryptococcal Meningitis in HIV

"CAN FEEL ILL" (CSF findings + clinical)

Clinical:

CSF:

Tests:

Key Insight

Anchor: The paradox of cryptococcal meningitis: serious infection, but CSF may look almost normal because the patient can't mount an inflammatory response. CrAg is the gold standard test. Elevated ICP managed with serial LP, NOT acetazolamide, steroids, or mannitol routinely.


MNEMONIC 11: Wernicke's Triad and Treatment Rule

"The COAt" and "GIVE THIAMINE BEFORE GLUCOSE"

Wernicke's Triad:

Pathology locations: Mammillary bodies (classic), periaqueductal gray, medial thalamus

Critical treatment rule:

Key Insight

THIAMINE MUST BE GIVEN BEFORE GLUCOSE in any at-risk patient Rationale: Glucose administration accelerates thiamine consumption precipitates acute WE in thiamine-deficient patients

Korsakoff triad:

Key Insight

Anchor: WE is acute and reversible with thiamine. Korsakoff is chronic and largely irreversible (25% full recovery). The transition from WE to Korsakoff is prevented by early aggressive thiamine replacement.


MNEMONIC 12: Impulse Control Disorders in PD

"PHECS" = All ICD Types in PD

Key Insight

Anchor: All caused by dopamine agonist overstimulation of D3/mesolimbic reward pathway. First management step = reduce/stop dopamine agonist. The DOMINION study: 13.6% prevalence on agonists.

Extra: DDS (Dopamine Dysregulation Syndrome) = addiction to the medication itself (compulsive overuse of levodopa/agonists beyond motor need).


MNEMONIC 13: Psychotropics to Avoid in Renal vs Hepatic Failure

Avoid in RENAL failure, "LEGAL":

Avoid in HEPATIC failure, "VALCO":

Key Insight

Anchor: In both conditions, start low, go slow, prefer hepatically metabolised drugs for renal failure and glucuronidated drugs for hepatic failure.


MNEMONIC 14: CJD Investigations

"MRI-EEG-3-QuIC"

The four investigations for CJD in order of use

InvestigationKey FindingNotes
MRI (DWI)Cortical ribboning + BG/thalamic hyperintensityMost sensitive, first test
EEGPeriodic sharp wave complexes (PSWC) 1–2 Hz67% of sCJD; NOT in vCJD
14-3-3Elevated in CSFSensitive but NOT specific
RT-QuICPositiveMost specific CSF test, gold standard

For vCJD specifically:

Key Insight

Anchor: Order of sensitivity: MRI > RT-QuIC > 14-3-3 > EEG (roughly). Order of specificity: RT-QuIC > EEG PSWC > MRI > 14-3-3. In practice, send MRI + CSF (RT-QuIC + 14-3-3) simultaneously.


MNEMONIC 15: HIV-Associated Mania vs Primary Bipolar Mania

"LICA": Features of HIV/AIDS Mania (Secondary Mania)

Contrast with primary mania:

Key Insight

Anchor: ART-associated mania (efavirenz) = review at first visit. Secondary AIDS mania (CD4 <200) = Valproate preferred (fewer drug interactions); avoid lithium (renal toxicity + interactions with tenofovir). Atypical antipsychotics for acute management but use with caution (HIV patients have increased EPS sensitivity).


MNEMONIC 16: Pseudobulbar Affect vs Emotional Lability

"PBA = Pathological BEHAVIOUR of Affect (dissociated from feeling)"

PBAEmotional Lability (BPD/mania)
Emotional congruenceIncongruent, expression = feelingCongruent, expression = feeling
ControlNone, involuntarySome, can be suppressed partially
TriggerMinor stimuliEmotional situations
DurationSeconds–minutesMinutes–hours
CauseNeurological (corticobulbar)Psychiatric or mood disorder
TreatmentSSRIs / Dextromethorphan-QuinidineTreat underlying condition
Key Insight

Anchor device: "PBA, the patient's FACE is crying but their SOUL isn't." The dissociation between motor-expressive output and subjective feeling is the defining feature. This is why SSRIs work rapidly, they're modulating the expression circuit, not waiting to lift a mood disorder.


MNEMONIC 17: Dopamine Agonist ICDs vs DDS

"ICD = Directed OUTWARD | DDS = Directed INWARD"

ICDs (directed outward, reward-seeking behaviours):

DDS (directed inward, drug-seeking):

Key Insight

Anchor: ICD = the world is the drug. DDS = the pill is the drug. Both need dopamine reduction, but DDS is more like addiction management, requires OFF-state dysphoria to be addressed.


MNEMONIC 18: MS Psychiatric Features: "CAFE"

Psychiatric features of Multiple Sclerosis

Plus: Anxiety (36%), Euphoria sclerotica (historical myth, largely not real)

Key Insight

Anchor: Depression = 50% lifetime risk, highest of any neurological disease. If you see "MS + mood" in an exam, the answer is usually depression (not euphoria sclerotica, that's a trap). SDMT (Symbol Digit Modalities Test) = best cognitive screen for MS processing speed.


MNEMONIC 19: Autoimmune Encephalitis Antibodies Quick Reference

### "NMDA = Young WomenLGI1 = Old MenCASPR2 = Morvan's"
AntibodyDemographicsTumourKey Feature
NMDARYoung womenOvarian teratoma (50%)Psychiatric phase first; orofacial dyskinesias
LGI1Older men (60s)None usuallyFBDS (faciobrachial dystonic seizures); hyponatraemia
CASPR2Older men; thymomaThymomaMorvan syndrome (encephalopathy + PNS + insomnia)
AMPARMiddle-aged womenBreast/lung/thymomaLimbic encephalitis; frequent relapses
GABABRMiddle-agedSmall cell lung cancerProminent seizures
Key Insight

Anchor: For exams: NMDAR = most common = psychiatric presentation first = young female = teratoma = treat with IVIG + steroids + rituximab + teratectomy. LGI1 = second most common = older male = FBDS + hyponatraemia = responds well to steroids.


MNEMONIC 20: Wilson's Disease Red Flags in Psychiatry

"KAYSER-FLAG"

When to suspect Wilson's disease in a psychiatric patient:

Flag = Investigate:

Key Insight

Anchor: Wilson's is treatable and reversible if caught early. Missing it = decades of inappropriate psychiatric treatment while copper destroys the basal ganglia and liver. Any young psychiatric patient with movement disorder (especially dystonia or wing-beat tremor) + liver disease check ceruloplasmin.


RAPID RECALL TABLE: All Mnemonics at a Glance

#TopicMnemonic
1HAND ClassificationANI Makes Dementia
2IHDS ComponentsTap, Tap, Remember
3OI by CD4 countTerrible PCP Comes, MACs Attack
4Efavirenz side effectsDAMN VIVID
5APs in PD (safe vs unsafe)Can Quetiapine Please? Olanzapine Ruins Haloperidol
6GPI featuresPARESIS
7Argyll Robertson vs Holmes-AdieAR=Accommodates, Refuses / HA=Has Atony
8HD genetics40-40 Rule + CAG Anticipation
9Anti-NMDAR phasesPretty Psychiatrists Never Recover
10Cryptococcal meningitis CSFCAN FEEL ILL
11Wernicke's triadThe COAt + Thiamine Before Glucose
12ICD in PDPHECS
13Psychotropics in organ failureLEGAL (renal) / VALCO (hepatic)
14CJD investigationsMRI-EEG-3-QuIC
15HIV maniaLICA
16PBA vs labilityPBA = face = soul
17ICD vs DDSOutward vs Inward
18MS psychiatric featuresCAFE
19Autoimmune encephalitisNMDA=Young Women / LGI1=Old Men
20Wilson's red flagsKAYSER-FLAG

Chapter 04

High-Yield Comparisons


HIV, Parkinson's Disease & Other Neuropsychiatry

Key Insight

Design note: All tables follow the spec, --earth header background, --sage-tint alternating rows, 8pt header / 8.5pt body, overflow-wrap: break-word. Tables are the highest-yield format for exam revision.


TABLE 01: HAND Staging: ANI vs MND vs HAD

FeatureANIMNDHAD
Full nameAsymptomatic Neurocognitive ImpairmentMild Neurocognitive DisorderHIV-Associated Dementia
Neuropsychological impairment≥2 domains, ≥1 SD below norm≥2 domains impairedMarked, multiple domains
Functional impairmentNoneMild, IADL affectedSevere, ADL affected
Prevalence (cART era)~33%~12%2–8%
Pre-cART HAD prevalence25–30%
Cognitive patternSubtle; only on formal testingAffects complex daily tasksCannot manage self-care
Memory type affectedRetrieval deficitRetrieval + learningGlobal
Psychomotor slowingPresentPresentProminent
Depression comorbidityCommonCommonVery common
Dementia typeSubcorticalSubcorticalSubcortical
ART responseGoodModeratePartial
Key Insight

Exam Pearl, The distinction between ANI and MND is FUNCTIONAL, not cognitive test scores alone. If the patient functions normally at work and home, it's ANI despite test impairment.


TABLE 02: PD Depression vs Primary MDD

FeaturePD-Associated DepressionPrimary MDD
Neurobiological basisLC noradrenergic + raphe serotonergic degeneration + mesolimbic dopamine lossMonoamine dysregulation without structural degeneration
Guilt / worthlessnessLess prominentProminent (core DSM criterion)
Suicidal ideationPresent but less lethal plans; less commonMore common; higher lethality
AnxietyVery prominent; panic attacks commonVariable
Mood reactivityPresent, responds to positive eventsAbsent in melancholic subtype
AnhedoniaProminentProminent
IrritabilityVery prominentVariable
Onset relative to motorMay PRECEDE motor symptoms by yearsAfter psychosocial stressor typically
Diurnal variationLess classicClassic (worse in morning)
Somatic overlapHeavy, fatigue, sleep, psychomotor changes overlap with PDLess confounded
ECT responseYes, AND improves motor symptomsYes, motor not affected
Dopaminergic treatmentPramipexole has antidepressant propertiesNo dopaminergic effect
MAO-B inhibitor interactionSelegiline/rasagiline + SSRI = serotonin syndrome riskLess of a concern
Preferred assessment toolGDS-15, HDRSPHQ-9, BDI-II, MADRS

TABLE 03: DLB vs PDD (Lewy Body Spectrum)

FeatureDementia with Lewy Bodies (DLB)Parkinson's Disease Dementia (PDD)
Temporal relationshipDementia first (or within 1 year of motor symptoms)Motor symptoms ≥1 year BEFORE dementia
"One-year rule"Defines DLB (dementia ≤1 year of parkinsonism)Defines PDD (dementia >1 year after motor onset)
Core motor featuresParkinsonism (usually less severe)Full PD motor syndrome (tremor, rigidity, bradykinesia)
Fluctuating cognitionProminent, hallmark core featurePresent but less pronounced
Visual hallucinationsCore feature; early and prominentCommon but later in course
REM Sleep Behaviour DisorderSupportive feature, present earlyPresent
Autonomic dysfunctionPresentPresent
Neuroleptic sensitivitySEVERE, can cause irreversible parkinsonism or deathPresent, avoid typical APs
DaTSCANAbnormal (reduced dopamine uptake)Abnormal
Cholinergic deficitMore pronounced (contributes to psychosis)Present
AChEI responseGood (rivastigmine approved)Rivastigmine approved (EXPRESS trial)
NeuropathologyWidespread cortical + subcortical Lewy bodiesPredominantly subcortical early; cortical late
Genetic relationshipSame disease spectrum as PDDSame disease spectrum as DLB
Key Insight

Exam Pearl, DLB and PDD are almost certainly the same disease at different points on a spectrum. The one-year rule is an arbitrary clinical convention. Both require the same caution with antipsychotics and both respond to rivastigmine.


TABLE 04: Anti-NMDAR Encephalitis vs First-Episode Schizophrenia

FeatureAnti-NMDAR EncephalitisFirst-Episode Schizophrenia
OnsetAcute, days to weeksInsidious, months to years
AgeAny; most common 12–45 years, female18–25 years (M), 25–35 years (F)
Sex predominanceFemale (young women, ovarian teratoma)Male earlier onset; roughly equal overall
ProdromeViral, fever, headache, malaiseSocial withdrawal, academic decline
Psychiatric phasePsychosis, agitation, bizarre behaviourPositive symptoms, negative symptoms
SeizuresYes, common; earlyRare (unless antipsychotic effect)
Movement disordersOrofacial dyskinesias, choreoathetosis, characteristicNone (unless tardive dyskinesia from AP)
Autonomic instabilityYes, tachycardia, hyperthermia, BP changesNo
ConsciousnessDecreased in neurological phaseIntact
FeverYes (prodrome)No
CSFPleocytosis (60%), elevated proteinNormal
EEGAbnormal, diffuse slowing; extreme delta brushUsually normal
MRIMay show limbic T2/FLAIR changesSubtle structural changes
Anti-NMDAR antibodiesPositive (CSF > serum)Absent
Ovarian teratoma50–60% of female casesNot applicable
Response to antipsychoticsPartial at best; definitive treatment is immunotherapyResponds to antipsychotics
TreatmentIVIG + steroids + plasmapheresis rituximab; teratectomyAntipsychotics + psychosocial
Prognosis>80% recovery with treatmentVariable; often chronic relapsing
Key Insight

Clinical Anchor, Any "first-episode psychosis" in a young woman with ANY of: fever, seizures, movement disorder, autonomic symptoms, decreased consciousness, rapid onset send CSF for anti-NMDAR antibodies before diagnosing schizophrenia.


TABLE 05: Huntington's Disease vs Other Causes of Choreiform Dementia

FeatureHuntington's DiseaseNeuroacanthocytosisWilson's DiseaseNPSLE (SLE chorea)Sydenham's Chorea
GeneticsCAG repeat, AD, chr 4VPS13A mutation, ARATP7B mutation, ARAcquired (autoimmune)Acquired (post-strep)
Age of onset30–50 (full penetrance)Young adults<40 yearsYoung adults5–15 years
Type of choreaGeneralised, flowingOro-facio-lingual + limbCoarse tremor + dystoniaGeneralised, unilateralGeneralised; self-limiting
DementiaProminent, progressive, subcorticalLateYesMild, fluctuatingRare
Psychiatric featuresDepression, irritability, apathy, OCD, psychosisPersonality change, depressionPersonality change, psychosis, depressionPsychosis, depression, cognitiveEmotional lability, OCD
Motor features besides choreaRigidity (late/juvenile), oculomotorTongue + lip biting, ticsWing-beat tremor, dysarthria, dysphagiaBallismus
Specific biomarkerCAG repeat >40Acanthocytes on blood filmLow ceruloplasmin, KF ringsAnti-dsDNA, APS antibodiesAnti-streptolysin O
Liver involvementNoneNoneYes, hepaticRare (lupus hepatitis)None
Treatment of choreaTetrabenazine, deutetrabenazineSymptomaticD-penicillamine, trientineImmunosuppressionPenicillin prophylaxis + haloperidol

TABLE 06: NPSLE Classification, CNS vs PNS Manifestations

SystemManifestationKey Psychiatric/Neurological Point
CNSAcute confusional state (delirium)Most common CNS-NPSLE; multifactorial
CNSCognitive dysfunction80% on formal testing; "lupus fog"
CNSMood disorder (depression)Most common psychiatric NPSLE; SSRIs
CNSAnxiety disorderUnderdiagnosed
CNSPsychosis2–8%; exclude steroid-induced
CNSSeizures15–20%; may require chronic AED
CNSCerebrovascular diseaseStroke/TIA, often APS-mediated
CNSChoreaRare; APS-associated; basal ganglia
CNSDemyelinating syndromeMS-like; optic neuritis, myelitis
CNSHeadacheNot explained otherwise
CNSMyelopathyLongitudinally extensive; APS or inflammation
PNSPolyneuropathySensorimotor; vasculitis of vasa nervorum
PNSMononeuropathy/multiplexVasculitis
PNSAutonomic disorderDysautonomia
PNSGuillain-Barre syndromeRare
PNSMyasthenia gravisRare; overlap syndrome
PNSCranial neuropathyCN V (trigeminal) most common
Key Insight

Exam Pearl, ACR 1999 defined 19 NPSLE syndromes (12 CNS + 7 PNS). The 3 most common = cognitive dysfunction, headache, mood disorder. The most dramatic = psychosis. The most dangerous long-term = cerebrovascular disease (via APS).


TABLE 07: Antipsychotic Safety in Special Neurological Populations

DrugPD/DLBHDHIVHepatic failureRenal failure
ClozapinePREFERRED (low D2)Use cautiouslyCaution (agranulocytosis + HIV neutropenia)Reduce doseReduce dose
QuetiapineAcceptable (low D2)AcceptableAcceptableReduce doseGenerally safe
PimavanserinFDA-approvedNot indicatedNot indicatedUse cautionGenerally safe
OlanzapineCONTRAINDICATED (motor worsening)AcceptableAcceptable; metabolic effectsReduce doseGenerally safe
RisperidoneAVOID (motor worsening)AcceptableUse caution (EPS sensitivity in HIV)Reduce doseReduce dose (renal clearance of 9-OH)
HaloperidolAVOID (severe EPS)Use cautiouslyAVOID in advanced HIV (severe EPS)Reduce doseGenerally safe
AripiprazoleCaution (partial D2 agonism, theoretical worsening of psychosis in PD)AcceptableAcceptableReduce doseGenerally safe
AmisulprideAVOID (D2 blockade)AcceptableUse cautionGenerally safeAVOID (renal clearance)

TABLE 08: Dementia Profiles: Subcortical vs Cortical

FeatureSubcortical Dementia (HD, PD, HAND, Wilson's)Cortical Dementia (Alzheimer's, Frontotemporal)
Primary deficitProcessing speed, executive function, retrieval memoryEncoding memory (Alzheimer's), language/personality (FTD)
Memory typeRetrieval deficit, cues HELPEncoding deficit, cues do NOT help
LanguageRelatively spared (dysarthria in motor disease)Aphasia (Alzheimer's, FTD semantic)
PraxisRelatively sparedApraxia (Alzheimer's)
AgnosiaRareCommon (Alzheimer's)
PersonalityApathy, slowingFTD: disinhibition/apathy; AD: late change
MoodDepression very commonDepression early in AD; less prominent in FTD
Psychomotor speedSlowed (prominent)Not primarily affected early
Movement disorderPresent (parkinsonism, chorea, tremor)Absent early in most cortical dementias
PrototypeHuntington's diseaseAlzheimer's disease
Key Insight

Exam Pearl, The cue-and-recall test differentiates: Give a category cue after failed free recall. If patient now remembers (cue helps) retrieval deficit subcortical. If patient still cannot recall even with cue encoding failure cortical (Alzheimer's pattern).


TABLE 09: Neurosyphilis Types Comparison

TypeTimingPathologyMotorCognitive/PsychiatricKey Sign
AsymptomaticAnyCSF changes onlyNoneNoneCSF VDRL positive
Acute meningitis<2 yearsLeptomeningitisCN palsies (II, VII, VIII)Headache, meningismusFever + meningism
Meningovascular5–12 yearsEndarteritis infarctionHemiplegia, CN palsiesPersonality prodrome strokeHubner's endarteritis
General Paresis (GPI)15–20 yearsDiffuse cortical meningoencephalitisHyperreflexia, tremorDepression, grandiose delusions, progressive dementiaArgyll Robertson pupil
Tabes Dorsalis15–25 yearsPosterior column + dorsal root degenerationAtaxia, absent reflexesPrimarily motor/sensoryLightning pains, Romberg+
GummaYearsGranulomatous massFocal deficits (mass effect)Depends on locationMass lesion on MRI
Key Insight

Anchor, The mnemonic PARESIS covers GPI. Tabes Dorsalis is the posterior column disease, remember: posterior column = proprioception + vibration sensory ataxia + Romberg positive + absent knee jerks. Argyll Robertson pupil occurs in BOTH GPI and tabes.


TABLE 10: Prion Disease Comparison: sCJD vs vCJD vs FFI vs Kuru

FeatureSporadic CJDVariant CJDFatal Familial InsomniaKuru
CauseSomatic PRNP mutation / spontaneous misfoldingBSE transmission via beefGermline PRNP D178N mutation (Met129)Ritual cannibalism
Epidemiology85% of CJD; 1–2/million/yearRare; young adults; UK outbreakVery rare; ADFore people of PNG; virtually extinct
Age of onsetElderly (median 65 years)Young adults (mean 29 years)Adult; AD inheritanceAdults; epidemic in women/children
Duration4–6 months (median 4 months)~13 months7–25 months3–24 months
Dominant featureRapidly progressive dementia + myoclonusPsychiatric/sensory symptoms first; dementia laterIntractable insomnia + dysautonomiaCerebellar ataxia + tremor ("laughing disease")
Psychiatric featuresLate, anxiety, depression as cortex involvedEarly and prominent, depression, anxiety, dysaesthesiasHallucinations, acting out dreamsEmotional lability, inappropriate laughing
MyoclonusProminent, stimulus-sensitiveLess prominentAbsent earlyAbsent
AtaxiaPresentProminentMildProminent, dominant feature
EEGPSWC (1–2 Hz) in 67%No PSWCAbnormal sleep studiesNon-specific
MRICortical ribboning + BG/thalamic DWI hyperintensityPulvinar sign (posterior thalamus T2)Thalamic signal changesNon-specific
CSF 14-3-3Positive (sensitive)Less sensitiveOften negativeRarely tested
RT-QuICPositive (highly specific)May be positiveMay be negativeRarely tested
Ante-mortem diagnosisRT-QuIC + MRI + EEGTonsillar biopsy (PrP^Sc in lymphoid tissue)Genetic testingClinical + exposure history
Thalamic pathologyDiffusePosterior thalamus (pulvinar)Selective, anterior + mediodorsal thalamic nucleiNot predominant
Transmission riskSurgical instruments, dura graftsInfected beefNone (genetic)Cannibalism only
Key Insight

Exam Pearl, vCJD is the exam favourite for its unique features: young patients, psychiatric onset, pulvinar sign on MRI, tonsillar biopsy, NO PSWC on EEG. FFI is tested for its pure insomnia phenotype and selective thalamic degeneration. Kuru = historical significance, Nobel Prize (Gajdusek 1976), cerebellar dominant.


SUMMARY COMPARISON TABLE: Autoimmune Encephalitides

AntibodyTargetDemographicsTumourPsychiatricNeurologicalKey Unique Feature
NMDARGluN1 subunitYoung FOvarian teratoma (50%)Psychosis, agitation (FIRST)Seizures, orofacial dyskinesias, autonomic instabilityPsychiatric phase before neuro; extreme delta brush on EEG
LGI1Leucine-rich glioma-inactivated 1Older M (60s)NoneAnxiety, depression, psychosisFBDS, limbic encephalitis, amnesiaHyponatraemia (SIADH); FBDS pathognomonic
CASPR2Contactin-associated protein-like 2Older M; thymomaThymomaSleep disorder, cognitive declineMorvan syndrome (encephalopathy + PNS), neuromyotoniaCombined CNS + PNS involvement (Morvan)
AMPARAMPA receptorMiddle-aged FBreast, lung, thymomaPsychosis, moodLimbic encephalitis, memoryHigh relapse rate
GABABRGABA-B receptorMiddle-agedSmall cell lung caDepressionProminent seizures, limbicSeizures most prominent feature
DPPXDPP-like protein 6Middle-agedNoneAgitation, confusionHyperekplexia, diarrhoea, weight lossGI symptoms preceding encephalopathy

Chapter 05

PYQ Frequency Analysis


HIV, Parkinson's Disease & Other Neuropsychiatry

Key Insight

Methodology: Questions reconstructed from recalled exams across PG exams, TN MGR, PG exams, and PG exams PG Psychiatry papers (2010–2025). Frequency, marks allocation, and examiner focus pattern identified. All question themes mapped to D1 Study Notes sections.


SECTION 1: QUESTION FREQUENCY HEATMAP

By Topic Area

TopicEstimated FrequencyMarks RangeTrend
HAND classification + pathophysiology████████ High8–10Stable
Anti-NMDAR encephalitis███████ High8–10Rising (post-2018)
HIV psychiatric comorbidities (depression, mania, psychosis)██████ High6–10Stable
PD psychosis + antipsychotics██████ High6–8Stable
Neurosyphilis / GPI█████ Medium-High5–8Stable
Huntington's disease (genetics + psychiatric features)█████ Medium-High6–10Rising
ART side effects (efavirenz)████ Medium5–6Stable
HIV testing and counselling████ Medium5Stable
CJD / prion diseases████ Medium5–8Stable
Impulse control disorders in PD███ Medium5–6Rising
MS and psychiatry / pseudobulbar affect███ Medium5–8Stable
Wilson's disease███ Medium5Stable
Hepatic / renal encephalopathy + psychotropic prescribing███ Medium5–6Stable
DBS psychiatric effects██ Lower3–5New
Dopamine dysregulation syndrome██ Lower3–5New
Fatal familial insomnia██ Lower3–5Rare

SECTION 2: RECONSTRUCTED PREVIOUS YEAR QUESTIONS

2.1 LONG ANSWER QUESTIONS (10 marks)


PYQ-LA-01

Describe HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders (HAND). Discuss the staging, pathophysiology, assessment tools, and principles of management.

(10 marks, PG Paper IV pattern, 2019, 2022)

Examiner focus: Complete Antinori classification mandatory. IHDS scoring must be correct. Pathophysiology should cover both direct viral protein neurotoxicity AND macrophage-mediated injury. Management = ART optimisation first, then symptomatic.

Marks breakdown (suggested):

Common mistakes:


PYQ-LA-02

A 28-year-old woman presents with acute onset psychosis, agitation, and bizarre behaviour over 2 weeks with no prior psychiatric history. Discuss the differential diagnosis, with emphasis on autoimmune encephalitis. How would you investigate and manage this case?

(10 marks, Exam pattern, 2021; PG exams 2023)

Examiner focus: Red flags for organic psychosis must be listed. Anti-NMDAR encephalitis clinical phases, psychiatric phase presenting first is THE teaching point. Investigation sequence and treatment protocol (first-line vs second-line immunotherapy) must be complete.

Marks breakdown:

Common mistakes:


PYQ-LA-03

Discuss the psychiatric manifestations of Huntington's disease. Describe the genetics, genetic counselling protocol, and ethical issues in predictive testing.

(10 marks, PG exams 2020; Exam pattern)

Examiner focus: CAG repeat numbers must be precise. Anticipation with paternal transmission. Psychiatric symptoms may precede motor, suicide risk in two specific periods. Genetic counselling must cover protocol AND ethical principles (autonomy, right not to know, children, PGD).

Marks breakdown:

Common mistakes:


2.2 MEDIUM ANSWER QUESTIONS (8 marks)


PYQ-MA-01

Discuss psychosis in Parkinson's disease, clinical features, pathophysiology, and management. Which antipsychotic is contraindicated and why?

(8 marks, PG exams 2018, 2021; PG exams 2022)

Examiner focus: Spectrum from minor hallucinations to formed VH to delusions. Step-wise management. Antipsychotic table, clozapine vs quetiapine vs pimavanserin vs AVOID (olanzapine, risperidone, haloperidol). Mechanism of olanzapine contraindication (D2 blockade worsens PD motor).

High-yield points:


PYQ-MA-02

Describe the neuropsychiatric manifestations of multiple sclerosis. Discuss pseudobulbar affect in detail.

(8 marks, PG exams 2020; PG exams 2022)

Examiner focus: Depression prevalence (50%) must be stated. Interferon-induced depression mechanism. Euphoria sclerotica = largely a myth, examiner expects you to say this, not accept the historical description. PBA: definition, pathophysiology (corticobulbar tract disruption), distinction from depression/BPD, treatment (SSRIs fast-acting; Nuedexta FDA-approved).


PYQ-MA-03

Discuss the classification and clinical features of neurosyphilis. Describe General Paresis of the Insane in detail.

(8 marks, PG exams 2017, 2019; TN MGR 2021)

Examiner focus: Classification table with timing (meningovascular 5–12y, GPI 15–20y, tabes 15–25y). PARESIS mnemonic for GPI. Argyll Robertson pupil, accommodates but does not react. Treatment = benzyl penicillin IV (not IM procaine for CNS disease as first-line). Jarisch-Herxheimer reaction.


PYQ-MA-04

Discuss depression in HIV infection, prevalence, aetiology, clinical features, and management.

(8 marks, PG exams 2016, 2023; PG exams 2020)

Examiner focus: Prevalence (30–60%). Multiple aetiologies (viral, ART, psychosocial, cytokine). Drug interactions with ART, ritonavir + SSRI. Efavirenz as cause of depression. Treat depression = improves ART adherence (this causal link is high-yield).


2.3 SHORT ANSWER QUESTIONS (5–6 marks)


PYQ-SA-01

Write a note on efavirenz and its neuropsychiatric side effects.

(5 marks, PG exams 2015, 2018, 2021; PG exams 2022)

Must include: Prevalence (40–52%), mechanism (GABA-A agonist + CB1 inverse agonist), list of effects (vivid dreams, depression, psychosis, mania, cognitive), time course (worst weeks 1–4, improves by 6–8 weeks), management (night dosing, switch to dolutegravir).


PYQ-SA-02

Describe HIV testing and counselling.

(5 marks, PG exams 2014, 2017, 2020)

Must include: 5 Cs (consent, confidentiality, counselling, correct results, connection to care). Types of HTC (VCT, PITC). Pre-test and post-test components. Window period. PPTCT. Linkage to care.


PYQ-SA-03

Write short notes on impulse control disorders in Parkinson's disease.

(5 marks, PG exams 2019; PG exams 2021; PG exams 2023)

Must include: Types (PHECS), prevalence (13.6% DOMINION study), mechanism (D3/mesolimbic, dopamine agonist preferential effect), risk factors, management (reduce/stop agonist first, then CBT/naltrexone). DDS as separate entity.


PYQ-SA-04

Write a note on Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease.

(5 marks, PG exams 2016, 2022)

Must include: Types (sCJD 85%, vCJD, fCJD, iatrogenic). sCJD clinical (rapidly progressive dementia, myoclonus, cerebellar, visual). Investigations (MRI DWI, EEG PSWC, 14-3-3, RT-QuIC). vCJD differences (young, psychiatric onset, pulvinar sign, tonsillar biopsy, no PSWC).


PYQ-SA-05

Write a note on Wilson's disease, psychiatric manifestations.

(5 marks, PG exams 2015, 2020)

Must include: ATP7B gene, AR inheritance, psychiatric features (personality change first, depression, psychosis, OCD), KF rings, diagnosis (ceruloplasmin, 24h copper, biopsy), treatment (D-penicillamine, trientine, zinc), clinical trap (misdiagnosed as primary psychiatric illness in young patients).


PYQ-SA-06

Describe the neuropsychiatric manifestations of SLE.

(5 marks, PG exams 2018; PG exams 2022)

Must include: ACR 1999, 19 NPSLE syndromes (12 CNS, 7 PNS). Key manifestations, cognitive dysfunction (most common), depression, psychosis (2–8%), seizures. APS and its neuropsychiatric role. Steroid-induced psychiatric effects vs SLE psychosis differential.


PYQ-SA-07

Short note on apathy in Parkinson's disease, distinguish from depression.

(5 marks, PG exams 2021; PG exams 2023)

Must include: Definition (quantitative reduction in motivated behaviour without mood disturbance). Prevalence (40–70%). Depression vs apathy distinction (negative affect present vs absent). Assessment (Starkstein Apathy Scale). Treatment (dopaminergic optimisation, rivastigmine, methylphenidate).


PYQ-SA-08

Write a note on REM Sleep Behaviour Disorder in Parkinson's disease.

(5 marks, PG exams 2022)

Must include: Definition (loss of normal REM atonia dream enactment). Prodromal marker of PD (precedes motor symptoms by >10 years). Braak stage 1–2. Risk of injury. Polysomnography for diagnosis. Treatment (clonazepam 0.25–0.5 mg, melatonin high-dose).


2.4 VERY SHORT / SPOT QUESTIONS (2–3 marks)

Question · Key Answer Points
What is the IHDS? What is its cutoff? 3-component scale (motor speed, psychomotor speed, 4-word recall); total 12; ≤10 suggests HAD
Name the antipsychotic FDA-approved for PD psychosis. What is its mechanism? Pimavanserin; 5-HT2A inverse agonist; no D2 blockade
What is the "one-year rule" in DLB vs PDD? If dementia appears within 1 year of parkinsonism DLB; if >1 year after motor onset PDD
Name the EEG finding in CJD. Periodic sharp wave complexes (PSWC) at 1–2 Hz; present in 67% of sCJD; absent in vCJD
What is extreme delta brush? EEG pattern in anti-NMDAR encephalitis; high specificity; present in ~30%
What is the 40-40 rule in Huntington's disease? CAG ≥40 repeats = full penetrance (all will develop HD)
Name the CSF test most specific for sporadic CJD. RT-QuIC (real-time quaking-induced conversion)
What is Argyll Robertson pupil? Small, irregular; accommodates but does not react to light; lesion in pretectal nucleus
What is punding in PD? Complex, stereotyped, repetitive purposeless behaviour (sorting, tinkering, collecting); form of ICD
What is the treatment of cryptococcal meningitis? Amphotericin B + flucytosine (2 weeks) fluconazole (consolidation + maintenance); serial LP for raised ICP
What is the most common psychiatric symptom in HD? Irritability (across most studies); depression is most clinically significant
Name the VMAT2 inhibitor approved for HD chorea. Tetrabenazine (TBZ); deutetrabenazine (newer, fewer side effects)
What is DDS in PD? Dopamine Dysregulation Syndrome, compulsive overuse of dopaminergic medication beyond motor need
What is euphoria sclerotica? Is it real? Historical concept of inappropriate cheerfulness in MS; largely a myth; depression is dominant
What is West Haven grade II hepatic encephalopathy? Lethargy, disorientation in time, personality change, asterixis present

SECTION 3: EXAMINER PATTERN ANALYSIS

3.1 Topics That Appear EVERY Exam Cycle

These topics have appeared at least once in nearly every examination sitting analysed:

  1. HAND, classification, pathophysiology, IHDS
  2. Psychiatric comorbidities in HIV, depression, mania (ART-associated), psychosis
  3. PD psychosis and antipsychotic management, clozapine vs quetiapine vs pimavanserin vs avoid
  4. Neurosyphilis/GPI, PARESIS mnemonic, Argyll Robertson pupil, treatment

3.2 Rising Frequency Topics (post-2018)

Topics showing increased exam frequency in recent cycles:

  1. Anti-NMDAR encephalitis, now a standard 10-mark question
  2. Impulse control disorders in PD + DDS, was rare pre-2018, now medium frequency
  3. HD genetics + psychiatric features, increasing
  4. Autoimmune encephalitis broadly, LGI1, CASPR2 appearing as short notes

3.3 Topics Likely Tested as Short Notes Only

These are tested but rarely as long-answer questions, prepare as 5-mark short notes:

3.4 Topics Never Asked as Standalone But Appear in Differentials

Prepare to mention these when relevant, not as primary answers:


SECTION 4: STRATEGY NOTES BY QUESTION TYPE

For 10-mark HAND questions:

For anti-NMDAR encephalitis:

For PD psychosis antipsychotic questions:

For HD genetic counselling:


SECTION 5: INTEGRATED TOPIC MAP

Topics that commonly appear TOGETHER in one question:

CombinationFrequencyExample Format
HAND classification + pathophysiology + IHDSVery HighSingle 10-mark LA
Anti-NMDAR phases + investigations + managementVery HighClinical vignette 10-mark
PD psychosis + antipsychotic choiceHigh8-mark standalone
HD genetics + psychiatric features + counsellingHigh10-mark standalone
Neurosyphilis classification + GPI + treatmentHigh8-mark standalone
Depression in PD + depression in HIV (compare)Medium5-mark each in combined
CJD types + investigationsMedium6–8 mark standalone
ICD in PD + DDSMedium5–6 mark standalone
MS depression + PBAMedium8-mark combined
Efavirenz + ART neuropsychiatric effectsMedium5-mark short note

SECTION 6: MARKS ALLOCATION CHEAT SHEET

When marks are not specified, use this allocation guide:

Content Element · Typical Marks
Introduction (1–2 lines, epidemiology) 0.5 mark
Classification / staging table 2–3 marks
Pathophysiology (mechanism) 2–3 marks
Clinical features (list or table) 2–3 marks
Investigations 1–2 marks
Management / treatment 2–3 marks
Conclusion / prognosis sentence 0.5 mark

Rule: Never skip investigations and management, they are the most predictable marking zones.

Format tip: One table is worth 3 prose paragraphs in examiner perception. Use them.


SECTION 7: YEAR-WISE QUESTION TRACKING (Reconstructed)

Approx. YearQuestion ThemePaperMarks
2014HIV testing and counsellingPaper IV5
2015Efavirenz neuropsychiatric effectsPaper IV5
2015Wilson's disease psychiatric featuresPaper IV5
2016CJD, types and diagnosisPaper IV8
2016HAND, staging and managementPaper IV10
2017Neurosyphilis, classification and GPIPaper IV8
2017HIV testing and counsellingPaper IV5
2018PD psychosis, features and managementPaper IV8
2018NPSLE neuropsychiatric manifestationsPaper IV5
2018Efavirenz CNS side effectsPaper IV5
2019HAND, full questionPaper IV10
2019ICD in Parkinson's diseasePaper IV5
2019Neurosyphilis / GPIPaper IV8
2020Depression in HIVPaper IV8
2020Huntington's disease, psychiatric + geneticsPaper IV10
2020MS and psychiatry / PBAPaper IV8
2020Wilson's diseasePaper IV5
2021Anti-NMDAR encephalitis (vignette)Paper IV10
2021PD psychosis, antipsychoticsPaper IV8
2021Apathy in PD (distinguish from depression)Paper IV5
2021ICD in PD + DDSPaper IV5
2022HANDPaper IV10
2022CJDPaper IV5
2022EfavirenzPaper IV5
2022Autoimmune encephalitis (LGI1 short note)Paper IV5
2022REM sleep behaviour disorder in PDPaper IV5
2023Anti-NMDAR encephalitisPaper IV10
2023HD, genetics, psychiatric, counsellingPaper IV10
2023Depression in HIVPaper IV6
2023ICD in PDPaper IV5

Key Insight

Ra note: This PYQ analysis is reconstructed from recalled questions, treat frequency data as indicative, not definitive. The most reliable signal is the repeat appearance of HAND, anti-NMDAR, and PD psychosis in virtually every cycle. Prioritise those three for maximum return on study time.


Chapter 06

Quick Review


HIV, Parkinson's Disease & Other Neuropsychiatry

Key Insight

Format: Each vignette contains: presentation, investigation findings, questions, diagnosis with reasoning, key teaching points, and examiner notes. All names are fictitious. Patient identifiers are randomised codes.


VIGNETTE 01: The Psychiatric Ward Trap

**PT-N19-01Female, 24 yearsReferred from General Medicine**

Presentation:

Priya, a 24-year-old postgraduate student with no prior psychiatric history, is brought by her parents after 12 days of increasingly bizarre behaviour. She had been well until 2 weeks ago when she developed a low-grade fever, headache, and malaise for 4 days, which her family attributed to examination stress.

Over the next week, she became agitated and suspicious, heard voices commenting on her actions, and developed the belief that her hostel warden was poisoning her food. She was initially seen by a psychiatrist at a private clinic who diagnosed first-episode schizophrenia and started risperidone 2 mg/day. She improved marginally but 3 days later began making repetitive chewing and tongue-thrusting movements and had a generalised tonic-clonic seizure.

On examination: GCS 13/15, oriented to person only, blood pressure 148/96 mmHg, heart rate 114 bpm, temperature 38.1°C. Repetitive orofacial movements noted. No focal neurological deficits.

Investigations:


Questions:

  1. What is the diagnosis? What clues in the history point to it?
  2. Why was risperidone an inadequate treatment? What are the risks of continuing it?
  3. Outline the complete management plan.
  4. What is the significance of the pelvic ultrasound finding?
  5. What is "extreme delta brush" on EEG and what is its clinical significance?

Diagnosis: Anti-NMDA Receptor Encephalitis

Reasoning:

Why risperidone was inadequate:

Management:

  1. ICU monitoring, autonomic instability risk (BP, HR, temperature fluctuations); respiratory monitoring (hypoventilation possible)
  2. First-line immunotherapy (simultaneously):
  3. IV methylprednisolone 1g/day × 5 days
  4. IVIG 2g/kg over 5 days
  5. Consider plasmapheresis if no response
  6. Antiepileptics for seizure control (levetiracetam preferred, no hepatic induction)
  7. Gynaecology referral: Right ovarian cystic lesion laparoscopic teratectomy (mandatory; dramatically improves outcomes)
  8. Second-line if no improvement at 2–4 weeks: Rituximab 375 mg/m2 weekly × 4 doses ± cyclophosphamide
  9. Symptomatic: Low-dose haloperidol or quetiapine for agitation if absolutely necessary; reassess after immunotherapy
  10. Monitor: Antibody titres, functional recovery, ovarian pathology follow-up

Prognosis: >80% substantial recovery with treatment. Teratectomy is the single most impactful intervention.


Key Teaching Points:


VIGNETTE 02: The Forgetful Professor

**PT-N19-02Male, 52 yearsNeurology OPD**

Presentation:

Ramesh, a 52-year-old college professor, is brought by his wife. Over the past 18 months, he has become increasingly forgetful, he misplaces items, forgets appointments, and repeats himself in conversations. His wife notes that he seems slower in his thinking and takes longer to grade papers. He has also become increasingly withdrawn and lacks his previous enthusiasm for teaching.

He has a 6-year history of HIV infection, currently on tenofovir/lamivudine/efavirenz. His last CD4 count (4 months ago) was 380 cells/μL, viral load undetectable. No history of OIs. No substance use.

On examination: Alert, cooperative. MMSE 24/30 (loses points on serial 7s, delayed recall, and complex commands). Finger-tapping slow bilaterally. Mild psychomotor slowing on clinical observation. No focal deficits, no tremor, no gait abnormality.

IHDS score: 9/12 (motor speed 3/4, psychomotor speed 3/4, memory recall 3/4)

Investigations:


Questions:

  1. What is the HAND diagnosis and why?
  2. What cognitive domains are affected and why does this pattern suggest subcortical rather than cortical dementia?
  3. Is efavirenz potentially contributing? What would you do?
  4. Outline management.

Diagnosis: HAND, Mild Neurocognitive Disorder (MND)

Reasoning:

Why subcortical pattern:

Efavirenz contribution:

Management:

  1. ART optimisation: Switch efavirenz dolutegravir; ensure viral suppression maintained
  2. Calculate CPE score of current regimen, optimise CNS penetration
  3. Treat contributing factors: Address depression (withdrawal, anhedonia), optimise sleep
  4. Cognitive rehabilitation: Memory strategies, compensatory aids (structured routines, calendars, pill organisers)
  5. Monitor with 6-monthly IHDS; annual formal neuropsychological testing
  6. Occupational health assessment if work impairment progresses

Key Teaching Points:


VIGNETTE 03: The Jealous Husband

**PT-N19-03Male, 68 yearsPsychiatry Clinic, Referred by Neurologist**

Presentation:

Gopal, a 68-year-old retired bank manager with a 5-year history of Parkinson's disease, is brought by his daughter. He has been on levodopa/carbidopa 100/25 mg TDS and pramipexole 1 mg TDS for 3 years.

His daughter reports that over the past 6 months he has become increasingly suspicious of his wife, accusing her of being unfaithful and hiding money. He has questioned her about her phone calls, followed her when she leaves the house, and once struck her when she denied his accusations. He also admits to gambling online regularly over the past year, spending approximately ₹40,000–50,000 per month, something he had never done before. He has no insight into either behaviour.

On examination: Mild-to-moderate resting tremor, bradykinesia. MMSE 23/30 (mild impairment). Mood: guarded, suspicious. No auditory or visual hallucinations.

Current medications: Levodopa/carbidopa 100/25 TDS, pramipexole 1 mg TDS, pantoprazole, amlodipine.


Questions:

  1. What are the two distinct neuropsychiatric problems in this vignette?
  2. What is the common pharmacological mechanism linking both problems?
  3. How would you manage the pathological jealousy specifically?
  4. What is the risk of simply adding an antipsychotic without addressing the dopamine agonist?

Diagnosis:

  1. Othello Syndrome (pathological/morbid jealousy), a delusional disorder with persecutory jealousy content
  2. Pathological gambling, impulse control disorder (ICD) in PD

Common mechanism: Both are manifestations of mesolimbic dopamine overstimulation by pramipexole (dopamine agonist with high D3/D4 affinity in ventral striatum/reward circuit).

Management of pathological jealousy:

Risk of antipsychotic without addressing agonist:

Gambling management:


Key Teaching Points:


VIGNETTE 04: The Missing Months

**PT-N19-04Male, 58 yearsPsychiatry Inpatient**

Presentation:

Suresh, a 58-year-old farmer with chronic alcohol use disorder (drinking ~180 mL of country liquor daily for 25 years), was admitted following a road traffic accident. He sustained no major injuries. During the hospital stay, he developed Wernicke's encephalopathy on day 3 (confusion, lateral gaze palsy, ataxia), which was treated with parenteral thiamine.

Six weeks later, he is reviewed at psychiatry OPD by his wife. The acute encephalopathy has resolved. However, his wife says he cannot remember anything that happened after 2015. He does not remember the accident, does not recognise the treating doctor despite meeting him multiple times, and yesterday told his wife about a "fishing trip he went on last week", which never happened. He can hold a brief conversation and remember things from the distant past (his childhood, his children's names, farming knowledge) but cannot recall what he had for breakfast.

On examination: Alert, conversational. Behaves normally in the consultation. When asked about the past week, gives plausible but incorrect accounts. Insists he is correct. MMSE 22/30 (loses marks on orientation to time/recent events and 3-word recall).


Questions:

  1. What syndrome is this? Distinguish it from dementia.
  2. Name and explain the three core cognitive features.
  3. What is confabulation, is it lying?
  4. What is the prognosis? What treatment options exist?

Diagnosis: Korsakoff's Syndrome (Chronic Wernicke-Korsakoff Syndrome)

Reasoning:

Distinction from dementia:

Three core cognitive features:

Anterograde amnesia Cannot form new declarative memories; every new event disappears within minutes
Retrograde amnesia Gap in memory for years before illness onset; recent past worse than remote (temporal gradient)
Confabulation Fills memory gaps with fabricated, but usually plausible, content

Confabulation, is it lying?

No. Confabulation is unintentional and unconscious. The patient genuinely believes the fabricated account. It arises because the memory system attempts to construct coherent narratives without access to accurate recent episodic memories. The patient has no awareness that the account is incorrect (anosognosia is also present, lack of insight into memory deficit). This distinguishes it from malingering.

Prognosis:

Treatment:


Key Teaching Points:


VIGNETTE 05: The Young Man with Personality Change

**PT-N19-05Male, 24 yearsPsychiatry OPD**

Presentation:

Arjun, a 24-year-old engineering student, is brought by his parents who are concerned about a personality change over the past 18 months. He was previously described as responsible, academically bright, and even-tempered. He now shows poor impulse control, makes crude remarks in public, has dropped out of college, and spends hours rearranging objects on his desk.

He was initially seen by a psychiatrist who diagnosed schizophrenia and started risperidone 2 mg/day, with minimal improvement. Over the following months he developed a coarse tremor of both hands (worse with posture/intention), slurred speech, and difficulty swallowing. His LFTs were checked and found to be mildly elevated (ALT 78 U/L, AST 65 U/L).

On slit-lamp examination: Golden-brown deposits at the periphery of the cornea in Descemet's membrane, bilaterally.


Questions:

  1. What is the diagnosis? What was the clinical trap?
  2. What is the significance of the slit-lamp finding?
  3. What investigations confirm the diagnosis?
  4. Outline treatment.
  5. What would happen if copper chelation is started without stopping risperidone?

Diagnosis: Wilson's Disease (Hepatolenticular Degeneration) with Neuropsychiatric Presentation

Clinical trap: Personality change + apparent psychosis in a young person misdiagnosed as schizophrenia. Antipsychotics started without investigating cause. This is the cardinal diagnostic error in Wilson's disease.

Slit-lamp finding: Kayser-Fleischer (KF) rings, golden-brown copper deposits in Descemet's membrane of the cornea, at the periphery. Present in >99% of neurological Wilson's disease. KF rings are pathognomonic when found alongside neuropsychiatric or hepatic features.

Investigations:

Test · Expected Finding
Serum ceruloplasmin LOW (<20 mg/dL)
24-hour urinary copper HIGH (>100 μg/day; >250 μg/day in symptomatic)
Liver biopsy Copper quantification >250 μg/g dry weight, gold standard
MRI brain T2 hyperintensity in lenticular nucleus, thalamus, brainstem
Slit-lamp KF rings (already confirmed)
Genetic testing ATP7B mutation on chromosome 13

Treatment:

Risperidone + chelation:


Key Teaching Points:


VIGNETTE 06: The Clever Conspiracy

**PT-N19-06Male, 44 yearsInfectious Diseases OPD**

Presentation:

Rajesh, a 44-year-old HIV-positive lorry driver diagnosed 7 years ago, attends for his 6-monthly review. He is on tenofovir/lamivudine/dolutegravir (switched from efavirenz 1 year ago). Viral load is undetectable, CD4 count 520 cells/μL.

His wife accompanies him and discloses privately that he has stopped his medication 3 times in the past 4 months. When asked, Rajesh says he doesn't want to take medicine every day, that the tablets make him feel like a patient, that his employer will "find out" if he is seen at a clinic, and that his neighbour recently died of AIDS despite taking medicine, so "what's the point."

PHQ-9 score: 14 (moderate depression). He endorses low mood, anhedonia, poor sleep, hopelessness, and poor concentration for the past 3 months. He denies suicidal ideation.


Questions:

  1. What are the barriers to ART adherence in this vignette?
  2. What is the relationship between his depression and non-adherence?
  3. How would you manage the depression in the context of HIV and dolutegravir therapy?
  4. What broader interventions improve adherence in this scenario?

Diagnosis: Moderate Depression (PHQ-9 = 14) with Multiple Adherence Barriers in HIV

Barriers to adherence:

Category · Specific Barrier
Depression Hopelessness, anhedonia, poor concentration passive pill non-adherence
Stigma Workplace stigma fear (employer finding out); internalised stigma (being "a patient")
Maladaptive health belief Neighbour died despite ART treatment futility belief
Practical barrier Lorry driver lifestyle irregular routine, away from home
Low health literacy May not fully understand undetectable = untransmittable

Depression-adherence bidirectional relationship:

Management of depression:

Broader adherence interventions:


Key Teaching Points:


VIGNETTE 07: The Choreic College Student

**PT-N19-07Female, 19 yearsNeurology Referral to Psychiatry**

Presentation:

Meghna, a 19-year-old first-year MBBS student, is referred by neurology. She presented 3 weeks ago with involuntary jerking movements of her arms and face, which started suddenly after a sore throat 6 weeks prior. The movements are described as flowing, unpredictable, non-repetitive, and worse with stress.

On psychiatric assessment: She is noted to have significant emotional lability, crying without provocation, then laughing inappropriately. Her mother reports she has become obsessively concerned about cleanliness (washing hands 30–40 times daily) and is anxious about "contaminating" her family. These OCD symptoms began simultaneously with the movements.

Past medical history: Two prior episodes of tonsillitis treated with amoxicillin.

Investigations:


Questions:

  1. What is the diagnosis?
  2. What is the mechanism linking streptococcal infection to psychiatric symptoms?
  3. How does this presentation differ from OCD due to other causes?
  4. Outline management.

Diagnosis: Sydenham's Chorea (with Psychiatric Manifestations, OCD and Emotional Lability)

Reasoning:

Mechanism, Molecular Mimicry:

Distinction from primary OCD:

FeatureSydenham's/PANDAS OCDPrimary OCD
OnsetAbrupt, explosiveGradual, insidious
Preceding eventStreptococcal infectionStress, developmental trigger
Motor symptomsChorea, tics presentNone
Emotional labilityProminentNot characteristic
Streptococcal serologyElevatedNormal
CourseEpisodic (relapse with re-infection)Chronic, continuous
Family historyLess prominentOften present

Management:

Intervention · Detail
Anti-streptococcal treatment Benzyl penicillin (10 days) to eradicate current infection
Secondary prophylaxis Benzathine penicillin 1.2 MU IM monthly for minimum 5 years (or until age 21), prevents rheumatic fever recurrence
Chorea treatment Usually self-limiting (resolves in 3–6 months); if severe: valproate or haloperidol
OCD treatment SSRI (fluoxetine) + ERP (Exposure and Response Prevention) therapy
Emotional lability Often resolves with chorea resolution; supportive counselling
Cardiology review Mandatory, exclude carditis (rheumatic fever's main morbidity)

Key Teaching Points:


VIGNETTE 08: The Sleepless Widower

**PT-N19-08Male, 71 yearsPsychiatry OPD**

Presentation:

Krishnamurthy, a 71-year-old retired schoolteacher and widower, presents with a 4-month history of deteriorating sleep. His daughter, who lives with him, reports that he talks, shouts, and thrashes about in bed, once falling out of bed and injuring his shoulder. He has vivid dreams, often of being chased, and appears to be "acting them out." He is distressed about this and has started sleeping on a mattress on the floor.

He also mentions that over the past 2 years, he has noticed his sense of smell is not as good as it used to be, and he has been constipated. Three months ago, he was noted by his GP to have mild resting tremor in his right hand.

On examination: Mild resting tremor right hand, subtle cogwheel rigidity right arm, gait mildly reduced arm swing on right. MoCA: 26/30 (loses 2 marks on visuospatial, 1 on delayed recall, 1 on fluency).

Polysomnography: Absence of normal REM atonia; complex movements correlating with dream content during REM sleep, confirms RBD.


Questions:

  1. What is the sleep disorder? What is its clinical and prognostic significance?
  2. What is the Braak staging concept and where does this patient sit?
  3. What other early features of neurodegeneration are present in this vignette?
  4. How would you counsel this patient and manage his sleep disorder?

Diagnosis: REM Sleep Behaviour Disorder (RBD) in the context of emerging Parkinson's Disease

RBD, Clinical and Prognostic Significance:

Braak Staging:

Other prodromal features present:

  1. Hyposmia (anosmia), one of earliest PD prodromal markers; olfactory bulb involvement (Braak Stage 1)
  2. Constipation, autonomic dysfunction; enteric nervous system Lewy pathology (Braak Stage 1–2)
  3. RBD, loss of REM atonia (Braak Stage 1–2; locus coeruleus + pedunculopontine nucleus)
  4. Cognitive changes on MoCA, visuospatial and fluency (Braak Stage 3–4 or early cortical involvement)

Counselling and Management:

Aspect · Content
Diagnosis disclosure RBD confirmed; this is an early marker of neurodegeneration; full PD assessment needed
Prognosis (honest) High probability of developing PD; monitoring will allow early intervention
Neuroprotection No proven disease-modifying treatment; aerobic exercise may be neuroprotective
Safety measures Remove sharp objects from bedroom, bed rail padding, consider bed alarm, floor mattress (already using)
RBD treatment Clonazepam 0.25–0.5 mg at night (first-line, reduces motor activity during REM); Melatonin 3–12 mg (safer in elderly; emerging evidence)
Bed partner safety Daughter should not sleep next to him; risk of inadvertent injury
Follow-up Neurology for PD monitoring; annual cognitive assessment

Key Teaching Points:


VIGNETTE 09: The Brilliant Confused

**PT-N19-09Female, 35 yearsNeurology Ward Psychiatry Liaison**

Presentation:

Sujata, a 35-year-old software engineer with known SLE (diagnosed 6 years ago, on hydroxychloroquine and low-dose prednisolone 7.5 mg/day), is admitted with a 3-day history of acute confusion, visual hallucinations (seeing "small children in the room"), and aggressive behaviour towards her husband.

Her prednisolone was increased to 60 mg/day by her rheumatologist 10 days ago following a flare (arthritis, pleuritis).

On examination: Alert but confused and disoriented in time and place. Responds to visual hallucinations. Blood pressure 156/98. Temperature 37.4°C. No meningism. Skin: butterfly rash present.

Investigations:


Questions:

  1. What are the two competing diagnoses and how do you distinguish them?
  2. What serological findings support NPSLE?
  3. How does the rheumatology team's recent decision affect the picture?
  4. How would you manage?

Competing Diagnoses:

  1. NPSLE (Neuropsychiatric SLE, acute confusional state with psychosis)
  2. Steroid-induced psychosis (high-dose prednisolone 60 mg/day)

Distinguishing features:

FeatureNPSLESteroid Psychosis
Prednisolone doseUsually lower; disease drives symptomsHigh dose (>40 mg/day), dose-dependent
Onset relation to steroidsNot correlated with dose changeOccurs within days-2 weeks of starting/increasing
Serological activityHigh anti-dsDNA, low complementNormal or stable serology
Disease flare markersElevated anti-dsDNA (1:1280), low C3/C4, lymphopenia, thrombocytopeniaNo change in serology
CSFMay show pleocytosisNormal
MRINPSLE changes (white matter lesions)Often normal
Response to steroid reductionWorsens (underlying disease)Improves

In this case:

Management:

Step · Action
Immunosuppression Maintain/optimise, active NPSLE requires treatment; add pulse IV methylprednisolone 1g × 3 days for acute CNS flare
Steroid taper After pulse therapy, taper oral prednisolone to lowest effective dose (try <20 mg/day); this addresses steroid-induced component
Add steroid-sparing Azathioprine or mycophenolate mofetil, allows prednisolone reduction while maintaining SLE control
Antipsychotic (short-term) Low-dose haloperidol or quetiapine for acute psychosis, titrate based on response
Safety One-to-one nursing; fall prevention; monitor BP (SLE + high-dose steroid = hypertensive risk)
Hydroxychloroquine Continue, protective against NPSLE flares
Follow-up serology Anti-dsDNA and complement at 4–6 weeks to assess response

Key Teaching Points:


VIGNETTE 10: The Rapid Decline

**PT-N19-10Male, 67 yearsNeurology Psychiatry Liaison**

Presentation:

Mohandas, a 67-year-old retired civil engineer with no prior psychiatric or neurological history, is referred urgently by neurology. Over the past 9 weeks he has developed rapidly progressive cognitive decline. His wife says he was entirely well 2 months ago, he was driving, managing the household finances, and playing chess regularly.

He now cannot recognise his grandchildren, is disoriented in his own home, cannot hold a conversation beyond a few seconds, and has developed jerking movements of his arms that are triggered by sudden sounds or touch. He also has poor coordination and an unsteady gait.

On examination: GCS 12/15. Disoriented in time, place, person. Stimulus-sensitive myoclonus. Cerebellar signs (dysdiadochokinesia, ataxic gait). Bilateral Babinski response. No fever. No meningism.

Investigations:


Questions:

  1. What is the diagnosis? Justify using all investigation findings.
  2. What is the significance of each investigation result?
  3. What is the differential diagnosis and how is each excluded?
  4. What is the prognosis? Is there any treatment?

Diagnosis: Sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease (sCJD)

Justification:

InvestigationFindingSignificance
MRI DWICortical ribboning + bilateral caudate/putamen hyperintensityMost sensitive imaging finding in sCJD; DWI positivity >MRI T2 in early disease
EEGPSWC at 1.5 HzPeriodic sharp wave complexes, present in 67% of sCJD; highly characteristic
CSF 14-3-3PositiveSensitive marker of rapid neuronal death; not specific (also in encephalitis, stroke, paraneoplastic), but in context highly supportive
CSF RT-QuICPositiveMost specific test for sCJD; gold standard non-invasive diagnostic
ClinicalRapidly progressive dementia + myoclonus + cerebellar + pyramidal signs = classic tetradMeets "probable sCJD" criteria (WHO)

Clinical features met (WHO Probable sCJD criteria):

Differential diagnosis exclusion:

Differential · Exclusion Reason
Autoimmune encephalitis (anti-NMDAR, LGI1) No pleocytosis; negative autoimmune screen; RT-QuIC positive; EEG shows PSWC not delta brush
Hashimoto's encephalopathy Anti-TPO not tested (send) but RT-QuIC positive shifts probability strongly
Viral encephalitis (HSV) CSF normal (HSV encephalitis shows pleocytosis); MRI shows ribboning not temporal lobe involvement
Vascular dementia Cannot explain 9-week course or myoclonus
Paraneoplastic encephalitis Negative autoimmune screen; RT-QuIC positive; send anti-Hu, anti-Yo, anti-Ri as belt-and-suspenders
Variant CJD Wrong demographics (elderly M); no pulvinar sign; PSWC present (vCJD does NOT have PSWC); no beef exposure history

Prognosis and Treatment:


Key Teaching Points:


VIGNETTE 11: The Angry Choreographer

**PT-N19-11Male, 42 yearsPsychiatry OPD**

Presentation:

Dinesh, a 42-year-old dance teacher, is self-referred to psychiatry. He has been having increasing difficulty with his temper over the past 3 years, explosive outbursts at students and family members, which feel "out of character." He has also noticed that he drops objects, trips occasionally, and his handwriting has changed.

His father died in a mental institution at age 55 after "going mad and not being able to walk." His 38-year-old brother was recently diagnosed with Huntington's disease.

On examination: Alert, oriented, cooperative but tangential. Mild choreiform movements of fingers and mouth (subtle, present on observation). MMSE 27/30 (loses marks on serial 7s and drawing). Reflexes normal. Speech slightly dysarthric.

He says he does not want genetic testing because "I can't deal with knowing."


Questions:

  1. What is the clinical diagnosis and how is it established?
  2. He refuses genetic testing. Is his right to refuse valid? How do you handle this ethically?
  3. His wife asks you privately to tell her his result "if you do test him." How do you respond?
  4. He has a 16-year-old son. Should the son be tested?
  5. What is the psychiatric management for this stage of HD?

Diagnosis: Huntington's Disease (clinically probable, pending genetic confirmation)

Clinical basis:

Ethical management of refusal to test:

Wife's request for private disclosure:

16-year-old son, should he be tested?

Psychiatric management of early HD:


Key Teaching Points:


VIGNETTE 12: The Man Who Forgot to Be Sad

**PT-N19-12Male, 74 yearsGeriatric Psychiatry OPD**

Presentation:

Subramanian, a 74-year-old widower with a 9-year history of Parkinson's disease, attends with his son. He is on levodopa/carbidopa 250/25 mg QID, entacapone 200 mg QID, and rivastigmine patch 9.6 mg/24h (started 18 months ago for PD dementia).

His son is worried because "Appa doesn't do anything anymore." He sits all day, has stopped watching cricket (which he loved), stopped calling friends, and eats only when reminded. When asked, he says he feels "fine" and is "not sad." He denies anhedonia when asked directly. However, he will not initiate any activity spontaneously.

His son had also noted that last week, he started crying suddenly in the middle of dinner for about 2 minutes, then stopped abruptly and resumed eating normally. "It was like he flipped a switch," the son says.

On examination: MMSE 18/30 (consistent with PD dementia). Bradykinesia and rigidity present. Hypomimic face. Flat affect on examination. No expressed sadness or dysphoria. No endorsement of hopelessness or suicidality.


Questions:

  1. Name the two distinct neuropsychiatric phenomena in this vignette and distinguish them.
  2. What is the key clinical question that separates apathy from depression in this case?
  3. What does the dinner episode represent and how is it treated?
  4. What is the management for apathy in PD dementia?

Diagnosis:

  1. Apathy (reduced motivation, no negative affect, no distress)
  2. Pseudobulbar Affect / PBA (involuntary crying episode, incongruent with emotional state)

Distinguishing apathy from depression:

FeatureApathy (this patient)Depression
Negative affect (sadness, hopelessness)Absent, "feels fine"Present, often prominent
Distress about the stateAbsent, no awareness of problemPresent, patient is troubled by it
AnhedoniaApparent to observer; denied by patientEndorsed by patient
MotivationReduced, will not initiate anythingReduced but often with subjective effort that fails
Social withdrawalPresentPresent
Cognitive elementOften related to frontal-executive dysfunctionRumination, guilt, worthlessness
Endorsed symptomNone, patient says "fine"Patient reports feeling sad/empty

Key clinical question: "Does this patient feel bad about not doing things, or do they simply not care either way?"

The dinner episode, Pseudobulbar Affect:

Management of apathy in PD dementia:


Key Teaching Points:



Key Insight

Notebook complete: NB-19, HIV, Parkinson's & Other Neuropsychiatry | 6 files generated | Paper IV MD Psychiatry Exit Examination

← All study guides