Epilepsy Psychiatry
Paper IV · Neurology, Medicine & Recent Advances. Six study modes, from notes to quick review.
Jump to a section
Study Notes
Sources: Kaplan & Sadock's Comprehensive Textbook of Psychiatry (10th ed.), Stahl's Essential Psychopharmacology (5th ed.), Trimble & Schmitz, Seizures, Affective Disorders and Anticonvulsant Drugs, Engel & Pedley, Epilepsy: A Comprehensive Textbook, Oxford Textbook of Epileptology
SECTION 1: SEIZURE CLASSIFICATION: ILAE 2017
The ILAE revised its classification in 2017. Older terminology (simple partial, complex partial, secondary generalised) is obsolete in exams, use the 2017 terms. However, expect older terms in clinical vignettes. Know both.
1.1 The Three-Level Framework
The 2017 ILAE classification operates at three levels:
| Level | Question Asked | Clinical Utility |
|---|---|---|
| Seizure Type | What kind of seizure? | Immediate management |
| Epilepsy Type | What pattern of seizures? | Syndrome classification |
| Epilepsy Syndrome | Which defined syndrome? | Specific treatment & prognosis |
1.2 Seizure Onset Classification
1.3 Focal Seizures: Detailed Classification
| Feature | Aware Focal | Impaired Awareness Focal |
|---|---|---|
| Old term | Simple partial | Complex partial |
| Consciousness | Preserved | Impaired |
| Memory of event | Present | Absent or partial |
| Duration | Usually < 2 min | Usually 1–3 min |
| Postictal state | Minimal | Often present (confusion, fatigue) |
| EEG | Contralateral focal discharge | Often temporal, bilateral spread |
| Common origin | Any lobe | Often temporal lobe (70%) |
Focal seizure descriptors (motor):
- Automatisms: Repetitive semi-purposeful movements (lip smacking, hand fumbling)
- Atonic: Loss of muscle tone in one body part
- Clonic: Rhythmic jerking
- Epileptic spasms: Brief sustained muscle contraction
- Hyperkinetic: Pedalling, thrashing movements
- Myoclonic: Brief irregular jerks
- Tonic: Sustained increased tone
Focal seizure descriptors (non-motor):
- Autonomic: Pallor, flushing, piloerection, cardiovascular changes
- Behaviour arrest: Cessation of activity
- Cognitive: Dysphasia, deja vu, jamais vu, forced thinking
- Emotional: Fear, anxiety, joy, ictal emotions
- Sensory: Somatosensory, visual, auditory, olfactory, gustatory, vestibular
- Sensory, special: The "dreamy state" of Jackson (temporal lobe)
Deja vu and jamais vu as seizure phenomena originate from the hippocampus/entorhinal cortex. When a patient reports "episodic feelings of familiarity or unreality," temporal lobe epilepsy should be in the differential.
1.4 Generalised Seizures: Detailed
Tonic-Clonic (Grand Mal):
- Tonic phase: 10–30 seconds, rigid extension, ictal cry (forced expiration through adducted cords), cyanosis
- Clonic phase: 30–120 seconds, rhythmic jerking, gradually slowing
- Postictal: Confusion, deep sleep, headache, myalgia, Todd's paralysis possible
- EEG: 10 Hz polyspikes during tonic; spike-wave during clonic; postictal flattening
Typical Absence (Petit Mal):
- Abrupt onset and offset, 3–20 seconds
- Staring, mild automatisms (eye blinking), no postictal phase
- 3 Hz spike-wave on EEG (pathognomonic)
- Precipitated by hyperventilation (useful in clinic)
- Age: 4–12 years, remits at puberty in 60–70%
Atypical Absence:
- Slower onset/offset, longer duration
- Associated with intellectual disability, multiple seizure types
- 1.5–2.5 Hz slow spike-wave
- Associated with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome
Myoclonic Seizures:
- Brief (<0.1 sec), bilateral, synchronous muscle jerks
- No loss of consciousness
- Worst in morning (characteristic of JME)
- Polyspike-wave on EEG
Atonic Seizures (Drop Attacks):
- Sudden loss of muscle tone
- High injury risk (helmet needed)
- EEG: Burst of polyspikes followed by slow waves
- Associated with Lennox-Gastaut
Tonic Seizures:
- Sustained muscle contraction, 2–30 seconds
- Usually during sleep
- Associated with Lennox-Gastaut
1.5 Epilepsy Types and Syndromes
SECTION 2: EPILEPSY SYNDROMES RELEVANT TO PSYCHIATRY
2.1 Temporal Lobe Epilepsy (TLE)
TLE is the most psychiatrically relevant epilepsy syndrome. It is the most common form of focal epilepsy and the most common cause of drug-resistant epilepsy. Know it cold.
Epidemiology:
- Most common focal epilepsy (60% of focal epilepsies)
- Onset: Any age, but peaks in childhood and adolescence
- Drug resistance: 30–40% of cases
Aetiology:
- Hippocampal sclerosis (mesial temporal lobe epilepsy, MTLE), most common structural cause
- Cortical dysplasia
- Tumours (ganglioglioma, DNET)
- Vascular malformations
- Encephalitis (especially HSV, limbic encephalitis)
- Perinatal injury, febrile convulsions (controversial causality)
Mesial TLE (MTLE), Key Features:
- Aura: Epigastric rising sensation (most common), fear, deja vu/jamais vu, olfactory/gustatory hallucinations
- Automatisms: Oral (lip smacking, chewing), manual (fumbling, picking)
- Impaired awareness during seizure
- Postictal confusion (>30 min), aphasia if dominant hemisphere
- Unilateral tonic posturing (contralateral to focus)
Lateral (Neocortical) TLE:
- Auditory hallucinations (superior temporal gyrus)
- Receptive aphasia (Wernicke's area, dominant hemisphere)
- Experiential phenomena: Forced memories, deja vu
- Rare automatisms
MRI in MTLE:
- Hippocampal sclerosis: Atrophy + T2/FLAIR hyperintensity + loss of internal architecture
- FDG-PET: Hypometabolism in ipsilateral temporal lobe (interictal)
- Wada test: For lateralisation of language and memory before surgery
Psychiatric Comorbidity in TLE:
| Condition | Prevalence in TLE | General Population |
|---|---|---|
| Depression | 30–50% | 10–15% |
| Anxiety | 25–40% | 15–20% |
| Psychosis | 5–10% | 1–2% |
| Personality changes | 20–40% | Variable |
| ADHD features | 30–40% | 5–10% |
2.2 Juvenile Myoclonic Epilepsy (JME)
JME is the most common generalised epilepsy syndrome (5–10% of all epilepsies). It is lifelong in most patients. The triad of seizure types is classic exam material.
Classic Triad:
- Myoclonic jerks, worse on awakening, early morning
- Generalised tonic-clonic seizures, often triggered by sleep deprivation
- Absence seizures, in ~30% of patients
Features:
- Onset: 12–18 years (adolescence)
- Normal intelligence, normal neurological exam
- EEG: Generalised polyspike-wave, 4–6 Hz, frontally dominant
- Photosensitivity: 30–50%
- Strong genetic component (CACNB4, GABRA1, EFHC1 mutations)
- AED of choice: Valproate (most effective); levetiracetam, lamotrigine alternatives
Psychiatric Considerations in JME:
- Higher rates of ADHD, anxiety, depression vs. general population
- Personality profile: Impulsivity, poor self-regulation (controversial, may reflect shared neurobiology)
- Valproate: Risk of cognitive side effects, teratogenicity, significant for female patients of reproductive age
- Sleep deprivation, alcohol, stress are key triggers, lifestyle factors matter
- JME patients often have insight into triggers but struggle to modify behaviour (ADHD overlap)
2.3 Childhood Absence Epilepsy (CAE)
Features:
- Age of onset: 4–12 years
- Multiple daily absences (50–100/day)
- Normal development, normal neurological exam
- EEG: Classic 3 Hz generalised spike-wave
- Remission: 60–70% by puberty; persistent in 30–40%
Psychiatric Relevance:
- Academic difficulties secondary to frequent undetected seizures
- Attention and learning problems independent of AEDs
- Misdiagnosis: Often mistaken for daydreaming or ADHD
- AEDs: Ethosuximide (first-line for pure absence), valproate (also covers GTC), lamotrigine
A child referred for "ADHD" with frequent staring spells, always consider absence epilepsy. Hyperventilation test in the clinic (3 minutes of deep breathing) can precipitate typical absences. This is a simple, zero-cost bedside diagnostic.
2.4 West Syndrome (Infantile Spasms)
The classic triad, infantile spasms + hypsarrhythmia on EEG + developmental regression. Know it. ACTH or vigabatrin are first-line treatments.
Triad:
- Infantile spasms, brief (1–2 sec), symmetric flexion or extension, clusters on awakening
- Hypsarrhythmia on EEG, chaotic, high-amplitude, asynchronous slow waves with superimposed multifocal spikes
- Developmental regression, loss of previously acquired milestones
Epidemiology:
- Onset: 3–12 months (peak 4–6 months)
- Incidence: 1/4000 births
Aetiology:
- Structural (40%): Tuberous sclerosis (most common structural cause, ALWAYS think TSC in infantile spasms), cortical dysplasia, hypoxic-ischaemic injury, Down syndrome
- Genetic/metabolic (10%)
- Unknown (cryptogenic) (50%)
Treatment:
- First-line: ACTH (most evidence), vigabatrin (especially if TSC, superior response)
- Second-line: High-dose prednisolone, ketogenic diet, pyridoxine
- Early treatment = better neurodevelopmental outcome
Psychiatric Outcome:
- Autism spectrum disorder: 30–50%
- Intellectual disability: 70–80% (varies with aetiology)
- ADHD-like features: Common
- If TSC-associated: Higher psychiatric burden
2.5 Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome (LGS)
LGS triad, multiple seizure types + slow spike-wave EEG pattern (< 2.5 Hz) + intellectual disability. Drug-resistant. Know which AEDs help.
Triad:
- Multiple seizure types, tonic (especially nocturnal), atonic (drop attacks), atypical absence; also GTC, myoclonic
- EEG, slow spike-wave (< 2.5 Hz), generalized; also paroxysmal fast activity (> 10 Hz) during sleep
- Intellectual disability, cognitive regression is common
Features:
- Onset: 1–7 years (peak 3–5 years)
- Preceded by West syndrome in 30%
- Drop attacks: Major safety concern; helmets required
- Tonic seizures during sleep: Characteristic, dangerous
- Drug-resistant in 90%
AEDs Used in LGS:
| AED | Evidence Level | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Valproate | High | First-line |
| Lamotrigine | High | Add-on; may worsen myoclonus |
| Clobazam | High | Add-on |
| Rufinamide | Moderate | Especially for drop attacks |
| Topiramate | Moderate | Cognitive side effects |
| Cannabidiol (CBD) | High (newer) | For seizure reduction |
| Felbamate | Moderate | Aplastic anaemia risk |
Psychiatric Comorbidity:
- Intellectual disability: Core feature
- Autism features: 20–30%
- Behavioural problems: Aggression, self-injury, high frequency
- ADHD: Significant overlap
- Psychiatric management: Challenging due to polypharmacy and cognitive burden
SECTION 3: TEMPORAL LOBE EPILEPSY AND PSYCHIATRIC PHENOMENA
3.1 Geschwind Syndrome (Interictal Behavioral Syndrome)
Geschwind syndrome is highly exam-tested. Know the five core features. Note: its existence as a distinct syndrome is debated, but it remains in exam syllabi.
Historical Context:
Norman Geschwind (1975) described a cluster of personality and behavioural traits in patients with TLE, particularly MTLE with hippocampal pathology. The original description was based on clinical observation rather than controlled studies.
The Five Classic Features (Geschwind Syndrome):
| Feature | Description | Frequency |
|---|---|---|
| Hypergraphia | Compulsive, excessive writing; detailed journals, letters, notes | 10–30% |
| Hyperreligiosity | Intense religiosity, mystical experiences, spiritual preoccupations | 10–30% |
| Hyposexuality | Decreased sexual interest and activity (opposite of what many expect) | Variable |
| Viscosity / Stickiness | Circumstantial thinking, difficulty ending conversations, adhesiveness | Common |
| Deepened affect | Intense emotional responses, everything feels profound and meaningful | Common |
Memory aid, 5 H's: Hypergraphia, Hyperreligiosity, Hyposexuality, "Hurts to leave" (viscosity), Heightened affect
Critical caveats:
- Not all patients with TLE show these features
- The syndrome is not specific to TLE
- Hypergraphia is the most specific feature
- Geschwind did not describe this as a psychiatric disorder, it is a personality style
- Trimble and Bear popularised the concept
- Recent research: Methodological criticisms; comparison studies show much weaker effects
If asked about Geschwind syndrome, give the five features, note it's associated with TLE particularly MTLE, mention the controversy about specificity and whether it constitutes a true syndrome. This shows examination depth.
3.2 Interictal Dysphoric Disorder (IDD)
Blumer's concept. Know the eight symptoms. IDD is specific to epilepsy, it does not map neatly onto DSM depression or cyclothymia.
Blumer's Description (2004):
Dietrich Blumer described a pattern of affective disturbance specific to epilepsy that differs from standard mood disorder classifications. It is characterised by:
Eight Core Symptoms:
Depressive-type (4):
- Depressive mood
- Anergia (lack of energy)
- Pain (somatic complaints)
- Insomnia
Labile/Irritable-type (4):
- Fear/anxiety (episodic)
- Euphoric moods (episodic)
- Irritability
- Paroxysmal affective disturbances
Key Features of IDD:
- Intermittent, not continuous
- Dysphoric in character (mixed low mood + irritability)
- Pleiotropy: Combines features of dysthymia, cyclothymia, and anxiety disorder
- Temporally related to seizure activity but not strictly peri-ictal
- Responds to SSRI + low-dose lamotrigine (anecdotally)
IDD vs. Major Depressive Disorder in Epilepsy:
| Feature | IDD | MDD in Epilepsy |
|---|---|---|
| Course | Intermittent, fluctuating | Sustained episodes |
| Irritability | Prominent | May be present |
| Euphoric periods | Yes (short) | Absent |
| Anhedonia | Mild | Often severe |
| DSM fit | Poor | Good |
| AED response | May vary | Standard antidepressants work |
3.3 Interictal Psychosis
See Section 5.2 for detailed coverage.
SECTION 4: ICTAL PSYCHIATRIC PHENOMENA
4.1 Overview of Peri-Ictal Psychiatric Phenomena
The peri-ictal classification is critical, ictal, postictal, and interictal phenomena are distinct. Knowing which phase produces which symptom is fundamental to both diagnosis and management.
Temporal Framework:
| Phase | Timing | Psychiatric Phenomena |
|---|---|---|
| Pre-ictal (prodromal) | Hours-days before | Mood change, irritability, anxiety |
| Ictal | During seizure | Fear, psychosis, automatisms, forced thoughts |
| Postictal | Minutes-hours after | Confusion, psychosis, depression, aggression |
| Interictal | Between seizures | Depression, anxiety, psychosis, personality changes |
4.2 Ictal Fear
Characteristics:
- Most common ictal emotion (60–70% of emotional seizures)
- Sudden, intense, unprovoked fear
- Duration: Seconds to 1–2 minutes
- Origin: Amygdala activation (mesial temporal focus)
- Patient retains memory of the fear if aware
- Quality: Unlike normal fear, no clear object, sudden onset, reproducible
Differential Diagnosis:
- Panic disorder: Longer duration, builds up, no EEG correlate, no stereotypy
- Generalised anxiety: Chronic, not paroxysmal
- PTSD: Triggered by stimuli, narrative content
- Pheochromocytoma: Hypertension, flushing, sweating
Clinical Implication:
Patients with TLE presenting to psychiatry with "panic attacks", especially brief, stereotyped, with no identifiable trigger, and with other TLE features, should have EEG performed.
4.3 Ictal Psychosis
Definition: Psychotic symptoms occurring during an ictal discharge, with EEG confirmation.
Features:
- Rare (< 1% of TLE patients)
- Usually brief (minutes)
- Hallucinations: Visual, auditory, olfactory more common than in schizophrenia
- Delusions: Simple, poorly formed
- Associated with continuous EEG abnormality
- Non-convulsive status epilepticus (NCSE) can present as psychosis, this is the critical clinical scenario
Non-convulsive status epilepticus (NCSE) presenting as acute psychosis is a psychiatric emergency. Any acute-onset psychosis with altered consciousness, fluctuating course, subtle automatisms, get an EEG. Missing NCSE = serious harm.
Ictal hallucinations by lobe:
4.4 Forced Normalisation (Landolt's Phenomenon)
Heinrich Landolt (1953) described this. Know the paradox: when seizures stop, psychosis can emerge. The EEG normalises, hence "forced normalisation."
Definition:
The phenomenon in which the cessation of seizures (either spontaneous or pharmacologically induced) is associated with the emergence of psychosis. The EEG, previously showing epileptiform activity, becomes paradoxically normal.
Historical Context:
- Landolt (1953): First EEG description, "forced normalisation" referring to the EEG finding
- Tellenbach (1965): "Alternative psychosis", emphasising the alternating, competitive relationship between psychosis and seizures
- The terms are sometimes used interchangeably but are distinct:
- Forced normalisation = EEG phenomenon (normalisation)
- Alternative psychosis = clinical phenomenon (psychosis when seizures remit)
Mechanism (Theoretical):
- Competing inhibitory mechanisms: Seizures may temporarily suppress psychosis-generating processes
- Dopamine hypothesis: Seizures may modulate mesolimbic dopamine; normalization removes this effect
- GABA-glutamate balance shifts
- Not fully understood
Clinical Scenario:
Patient with known TLE, previously seizure-prone, started on new AED (e.g., vigabatrin, levetiracetam). Seizures stop. Two weeks later: acute psychosis, florid hallucinations, EEG now normal.
Management:
- Reduce or discontinue the offending AED (discuss with neurologist)
- Short-term antipsychotic (lowest dose)
- Do NOT automatically increase AED dose, may worsen psychosis
- Monitor EEG during psychosis
AEDs Most Associated with Forced Normalisation:
- Vigabatrin (highest risk)
- Ethosuximide
- Lamotrigine (occasionally)
- Levetiracetam (behavioural side effects, but forced normalisation less clearly established)
SECTION 5: POSTICTAL AND INTERICTAL PSYCHOSIS
5.1 Postictal Psychosis (PIP)
The lucid interval is the signature feature of postictal psychosis. Know it. Know the timing. Know the risk factors. This is a classic exam question.
Definition:
Psychosis emerging after a seizure or cluster of seizures, with a lucid interval (clear period) of 24–48 hours between seizure and psychosis onset.
Epidemiology:
- Prevalence: 7–10% of TLE patients
- More common in: Bilateral seizure foci, longer duration of epilepsy, poor seizure control
The Lucid Interval:
- Critical distinguishing feature
- Duration: Typically 24–48 hours (range: 12 hours to 7 days)
- During this period: Patient is relatively clear, may seem recovered
- Then: Acute psychosis emerges
Clinical Features of PIP:
Risk Factors for PIP:
- Bilateral (or dual) seizure foci
- History of febrile convulsions
- Longer duration of epilepsy (> 10 years)
- Male sex (some studies)
- Temporal lobe focus
- Prior postictal psychosis (strongest predictor)
Management of PIP:
- Immediate: Observation, safety, supportive care
- Antipsychotics: Low-dose haloperidol or olanzapine (avoid clozapine, lowers seizure threshold; avoid phenothiazines)
- Benzodiazepines: For agitation
- AED optimisation: Reduce seizure frequency to prevent recurrence
- Psychoeducation: Family must understand lucid interval, they may think patient is fine, then decompensate
Natural History:
- Self-limiting in most cases (days to weeks)
- Risk of progression to chronic interictal psychosis with repeated episodes (~15%)
- Does not require long-term antipsychotic in most cases
5.2 Interictal Psychosis (IIP) / Schizophrenia-Like Psychosis of Epilepsy (SLPE)
Slater and Beard (1963) is the foundational paper. Know the features that distinguish SLPE from schizophrenia, the "positive without negative" pattern and preserved affect are classic exam content.
Slater and Beard (1963):
Classic study describing psychosis in 69 epilepsy patients. Found psychosis resembling schizophrenia but with key differences.
Definition:
Chronic psychosis occurring in epilepsy patients, not time-locked to seizure activity (interictal), persisting for months to years.
Prevalence:
- 5–10% of TLE patients
- Risk vs. general population: 6–12x higher (depending on study)
- Most common in: MTLE, bilateral foci, long duration, poor control
Clinical Features, SLPE vs. Schizophrenia:
| Feature | SLPE (Interictal Psychosis) | Schizophrenia |
|---|---|---|
| Positive symptoms | Prominent (hallucinations, delusions) | Prominent |
| Negative symptoms | Mild or absent, KEY DISTINCTION | Often prominent |
| Affect | Preserved, warm, KEY DISTINCTION | Often flat/blunted |
| Social deterioration | Milder | More severe |
| Formal thought disorder | Less severe | Common |
| Religious content | Often present | Less specific |
| Catatonia | Rare | Possible |
| Premorbid function | Often normal | Often impaired |
| Onset | After epilepsy onset (mean: 11 years after) | Early adulthood |
| FH of schizophrenia | Not elevated | Elevated |
| First rank symptoms | Present | Present |
The "Positive Without Negative" Pattern:
This is the most testable feature of SLPE. Hallucinations and delusions are present, but the patient retains warmth, maintains relationships, and shows preserved emotional responsiveness. This "schizophreniform" picture without the typical deterioration distinguishes it.
Risk Factors for SLPE:
- TLE (especially MTLE and bilateral TLE)
- Long duration of epilepsy
- Poor seizure control
- Alien tissue lesions (ganglioglioma, hamartoma, DNET)
- Bilateral or left-sided foci
- Ictal fear as prominent symptom
- History of postictal psychosis
Mechanism Hypotheses:
- Kindling: Repeated sub-threshold stimulation → permanent neuronal changes
- Structural: Hippocampal, amygdala, and parahippocampal atrophy → psychotic vulnerability
- Neurotransmitter: Dopaminergic dysregulation secondary to limbic pathology
- Shared vulnerability: Common genetic/neurodevelopmental substrate for epilepsy and psychosis
Management of SLPE:
- Antipsychotics: Atypical antipsychotics preferred
- Aripiprazole: Least proconvulsant
- Risperidone: Effective; moderate proconvulsant risk
- Olanzapine: Effective; moderate proconvulsant
- Clozapine: Avoid (highest proconvulsant risk); reserve for treatment-resistant
- Haloperidol: Useful acutely; chronic use less favoured
- Continue AEDs, do NOT reduce AEDs expecting this to help psychosis
- Monitor EEG when starting antipsychotics
Proconvulsant Risk of Antipsychotics (Low → High):
Aripiprazole < Haloperidol < Risperidone < Quetiapine < Olanzapine < Clozapine
SECTION 6: DEPRESSION IN EPILEPSY
6.1 Epidemiology and Prevalence
Prevalence:
- 20–55% of epilepsy patients (most consistent estimate: ~30%)
- Most common psychiatric comorbidity in epilepsy
- More common in:
- TLE
- Drug-resistant epilepsy
- Active seizures (vs. well-controlled)
- Left hemisphere focus (some evidence)
- Limbic involvement
The Bidirectional Relationship:
The relationship between epilepsy and depression is bidirectional, each increases the risk of the other. This is not coincidence; it reflects shared neurobiology. Examiners love this concept.
Mechanisms of Depression in Epilepsy:
6.2 Postictal Depression
- Occurs within 24–48 hours of seizure
- Duration: Hours to 1–2 days
- Features: Sadness, hopelessness, fatigue, suicidal ideation (can be dangerous)
- May be part of postictal psychiatric syndrome (postictal psychosis, agitation, mania also occur)
- Management: Short-term support; SSRI if persistent or severe
6.3 NDDI-E (Neurological Disorders Depression Inventory for Epilepsy)
NDDI-E is the validated, preferred screening tool for depression in epilepsy. Know the cutoff score.
Why NDDI-E and not PHQ-9?
- PHQ-9 includes somatic items that overlap with AED side effects and seizure effects (fatigue, sleep disturbance, concentration)
- NDDI-E excludes somatic items; focuses on cognitive-emotional features
- Developed and validated specifically for epilepsy populations
NDDI-E Items (6 items, each scored 1–4):
- Everything is a struggle
- Nothing I do is right
- Feel guilty
- I'd be better off dead
- Frustrated
- Difficulty finding pleasure
Scoring:
- Total: 6–24
- Cutoff ≥ 15: Probable major depressive disorder (sensitivity 81%, specificity 90%)
- Scores 11–14: Subclinical, monitor
GAD-7 for Anxiety:
- GAD-7 is recommended for anxiety screening in epilepsy
- Same rationale, validated and less somatic overlap than other scales
6.4 Antidepressants in Epilepsy
Proconvulsant Risk, Antidepressants:
| Antidepressant | Seizure Risk | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| SSRIs (sertraline, citalopram, escitalopram) | Low | First-line in epilepsy |
| SNRIs (venlafaxine, duloxetine) | Low-moderate | Acceptable |
| Mirtazapine | Low | Good option, sedating |
| TCAs (amitriptyline, imipramine) | High | Avoid, especially at high doses |
| Bupropion | High | Avoid, most proconvulsant antidepressant |
| Maprotiline | High | Avoid |
| Clomipramine | High | Avoid |
| Fluoxetine | Low-moderate | CYP interactions |
SSRIs are the antidepressants of choice in epilepsy. Bupropion is the most proconvulsant antidepressant, it is contraindicated in epilepsy.
6.5 Suicide Risk in Epilepsy
Prevalence:
- Suicide attempts: 5x higher than general population
- Completed suicide: 3–5x higher
- SUDEP (Sudden Unexpected Death in Epilepsy): 1/1000 patient-years (competing cause)
Risk Factors for Suicide in Epilepsy:
- TLE (especially MTLE)
- Depression (strongest modifiable risk factor)
- Drug-resistant epilepsy
- Young age, male sex
- Recent diagnosis
- Social isolation, unemployment
- AED side effects (particularly topiramate and levetiracetam)
FDA Black Box Warning (2008):
All AEDs carry an FDA black box warning for increased suicidality. This applies to the class as a whole, not specific agents. Meta-analysis showed approximately 2x increased risk. The absolute risk is small.
The FDA 2008 warning covers ALL AEDs for suicidality. This is frequently tested. The risk is real but small, do not withhold AEDs because of this.
SECTION 7: ANXIETY IN EPILEPSY
7.1 Prevalence and Types
Prevalence: 20–40% of epilepsy patients
Anxiety Disorders in Epilepsy:
7.2 Anticipatory Anxiety
- Fear of the next seizure, "living on the edge"
- Leads to avoidance behaviour, activity restriction
- Reduced quality of life independent of seizure frequency
- Cognitive-behavioural interventions are effective
- AED optimisation helps by reducing uncertainty
7.3 Treatment
- SSRIs/SNRIs: First-line for GAD, panic, social anxiety in epilepsy
- Buspirone: Safe; no proconvulsant risk; useful for GAD
- Benzodiazepines: Use with caution (tolerance, sedation, cognitive impairment, respiratory depression)
- CBT: Evidence-based; strongly recommended alongside pharmacotherapy
- Mindfulness-based interventions: Growing evidence
SECTION 8: ANTIEPILEPTIC DRUGS AND PSYCHIATRIC EFFECTS
8.1 Overview
AEDs have both positive (mood-stabilising, anxiolytic) and negative (depression, psychosis, cognitive impairment) psychiatric effects. The table below is essential exam content.
Master Table, AED Psychiatric Profiles:
| AED | Mechanism | Positive Psych Effects | Negative Psych Effects | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Valproate | GABA enhancement, sodium channel blockade | Mood stabiliser (mania, bipolar), anxiety reduction | Weight gain, cognitive dulling, teratogenicity | First-line mood stabiliser; also used in BD-I |
| Carbamazepine | Sodium channel blockade | Mood stabilisation, aggression reduction | Hyponatraemia (SIADH), sedation, cognitive effects | Structurally similar to TCA; also used in BD |
| Lamotrigine | Sodium/calcium channel, glutamate reduction | Mood stabilisation (especially bipolar depression), reduced mood cycling | Rash (serious), insomnia, rarely psychosis | Superior for bipolar depression |
| Levetiracetam | SV2A binding | Minimal sedation, no cognitive impairment | Irritability, aggression, depression, psychosis (most psychiatric side effects of newer AEDs) | Psychiatric side effects in ~10%; dose-dependent |
| Topiramate | Multiple (GABA, glutamate, sodium channel, carbonic anhydrase) | Weight loss (can be a "positive") | Cognitive impairment (word-finding difficulty, processing speed), "Dope-iramate", depression, suicidality, psychosis (rarely) | Cognitive effects are dose-dependent |
| Phenobarbital | GABA-A enhancement | Sedation (occasionally desired) | Depression, cognitive impairment, hyperactivity in children, tolerance, dependence | Worst for depression among older AEDs |
| Phenytoin | Sodium channel blockade | Low psychiatric burden when used appropriately | Cognitive effects at high doses, gingival hyperplasia | Drug interactions significant |
| Oxcarbazepine | Sodium channel blockade | Similar to carbamazepine | Hyponatraemia, dizziness | Fewer drug interactions than carbamazepine |
| Clonazepam | GABA-A | Anxiolytic, antimyoclonic | Dependence, sedation, cognitive impairment, paradoxical disinhibition | Use cautiously long-term |
| Vigabatrin | GABA transaminase inhibitor | Effective for infantile spasms, TSC | Depression, psychosis, forced normalisation | Visual field defects, irreversible; monitor |
| Lacosamide | Slow inactivation sodium channel | Low psychiatric burden | Dizziness, diplopia; psychiatric effects minimal | Well tolerated psychiatrically |
| Zonisamide | Multiple | Modest weight loss | Cognitive effects, depression, kidney stones | Similar to topiramate profile |
| Gabapentin/Pregabalin | Alpha-2-delta subunit | Anxiolytic, pain; used as adjuncts | Sedation, weight gain, misuse potential (pregabalin especially) | Pregabalin: Schedule 5 in UK; abuse potential |
| Perampanel | AMPA antagonist | Good tolerability | Aggression, irritability, hostility (dose-dependent) | Warn patients about behavioural effects |
8.2 Valproate: Psychiatric Indications
Epilepsy uses:
- Generalised epilepsy (JME, childhood absence, idiopathic)
- Focal epilepsy (second-line)
- Lennox-Gastaut syndrome
- Status epilepticus (IV formulation)
Psychiatric uses:
- Bipolar disorder I, acute mania (first-line), maintenance
- Augmentation in schizoaffective disorder
- Impulse control disorders
- Aggression/behavioural problems in dementia, ID
- Migraine prophylaxis (neurological)
Valproate teratogenicity is exam gold. Neural tube defects (spina bifida aperta): 1–2% risk (vs. ~0.05% baseline). Overall major congenital malformations: ~10%. Neurodevelopmental effects: IQ reduction, autism risk. AVOID in women of childbearing potential unless other options exhausted. VALPROATE MUST NOT be used in girls/women without effective contraception unless clearly necessary (MHRA 2018, revised guidance 2024).
8.3 Carbamazepine: Psychiatric Considerations
- Mood stabiliser: Particularly for rapid cycling, mixed states, BD with dysphoric mania
- Drug interactions: Strong CYP3A4 inducer
- Reduces plasma levels of: Haloperidol, olanzapine, risperidone, aripiprazole, quetiapine, valproate, lamotrigine
- Oral contraceptives: Efficacy reduced (important, counsel women)
- SIADH and hyponatraemia: Especially in elderly; can cause encephalopathy
- Aplastic anaemia/agranulocytosis: Rare but potentially fatal; monitor FBC
- Oxcarbazepine: Less enzyme induction, better tolerated
8.4 Lamotrigine: Psychiatric Considerations
- Mood stabilisation: Evidence-based for bipolar depression maintenance
- NOT first-line for acute mania
- Rash: 10% mild rash; 0.1–0.3% severe (Stevens-Johnson syndrome, TEN)
- Risk reduced by slow titration
- Risk increased with: Rapid titration, concomitant valproate (doubles lamotrigine levels → double rash risk)
- Interaction with oral contraceptives: OCP reduces lamotrigine levels by ~50%; monitor doses if OCP started/stopped
- Psychosis: Rare; associated with forced normalisation in some patients
8.5 Levetiracetam: Psychiatric Side Effects
Levetiracetam (Keppra) is the AED most associated with psychiatric side effects among newer agents. Irritability and agitation in ~10% of patients. Depression and psychosis less common but recognised.
Psychiatric side effects:
- Irritability/agitation: 10–15% (dose-dependent)
- Depression: 5–10%
- Anxiety: 5–8%
- Psychosis: 0.5–2% (can be severe, acute onset)
- Associated with forced normalisation
Mechanism hypothesis: SV2A binding modulates neurotransmitter release; unclear why this produces behavioural effects in some patients.
Management:
- Dose reduction often helps
- Adjunctive pyridoxine (vitamin B6): Some evidence for reducing irritability in children; less clear in adults
- Switching to alternative AED if intolerable
- Antidepressants/antipsychotics as needed
8.6 Topiramate: Cognitive Effects
"Dopamax" or "Dope-iramate", the cognitive side effects of topiramate are clinically significant and exam-testable. Word-finding difficulty (anomia) is most characteristic.
Cognitive effects:
- Word-finding difficulty: Most prominent, distressing to patients
- Processing speed: Reduced
- Working memory: Impaired
- Attention: Impaired
- Effects: Dose-dependent (much worse at > 200 mg/day)
Other notable effects:
- Weight loss (positive for some patients, negative in underweight individuals)
- Nephrolithiasis (carbonic anhydrase inhibition → alkaline urine → calcium phosphate stones)
- Oligohidrosis (reduced sweating), rare but dangerous in hot weather
- Depression and suicidality: Monitor
8.7 Phenobarbital: Depression Risk
- Oldest AED; first-line in low-income countries (cheap, available)
- Depression: Most clearly linked to phenobarbital among all AEDs
- Mechanism: GABA-A enhancement → sedation, CNS depression
- Hyperactivity in children: Paradoxical effect
- Sedation: Prominent, limits use
- Cognitive impairment: Significant with chronic use
- Tolerance: Develops to sedative effects
- Dependence: Physical dependence; withdrawal seizures if stopped abruptly
SECTION 9: AED INTERACTIONS WITH PSYCHOTROPICS
9.1 Enzyme Induction by AEDs
Strong CYP3A4 Inducers (AEDs):
- Carbamazepine
- Phenytoin
- Phenobarbital
- Primidone (metabolised to phenobarbital)
Effect on Psychotropics:
These AEDs dramatically reduce plasma levels of most antipsychotics and antidepressants. Clinical consequence: Apparent treatment resistance.
Clinical implication: When starting enzyme-inducing AEDs, anticipate need to increase psychotropic doses. When stopping them, reduce psychotropic doses (risk of toxicity).
9.2 Enzyme Inhibition by AEDs
Valproate inhibits CYP2C9, CYP2C19, and is a UGT inhibitor:
- Doubles lamotrigine levels (important, rash risk)
- Increases phenobarbital levels
- May increase levels of certain SSRIs (via CYP2C19)
9.3 Psychotropic Effects on AED Levels
Clozapine + carbamazepine = CONTRAINDICATED. Both cause agranulocytosis independently; combination dramatically increases risk.
9.4 Seizure Threshold and Psychotropics
Psychotropics that Lower Seizure Threshold:
| Drug | Seizure Risk Level | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Clozapine | Very High | 3–5% at high doses; EEG monitoring recommended |
| Chlorpromazine | High | Older antipsychotics generally more proconvulsant |
| Bupropion | High | Most proconvulsant antidepressant |
| Tricyclics | High | Especially at toxic levels |
| Maprotiline | High | Tetracyclic |
| Lithium | Moderate-high | Especially at toxic levels (tremor → seizure cascade) |
| Haloperidol | Moderate | |
| Olanzapine, risperidone | Low-moderate | |
| SSRIs | Low | Safest class |
| Aripiprazole | Low | Safest antipsychotic |
SECTION 10: PSEUDOSEIZURES / PNES
10.1 Terminology
"PNES", Psychogenic Non-Epileptic Seizures, is the preferred current term. "Pseudoseizures" is outdated but still used clinically. "Functional seizures" is increasingly used (part of functional neurological disorder, FND spectrum). Know all three terms.
Current preferred terminology: Psychogenic Non-Epileptic Seizures (PNES) or Functional Seizures
Why terminology matters: "Pseudo" implies faking. These are not voluntary. They are genuine, disabling, and medically serious. This distinction matters in court, in medical letters, and in therapeutic relationships.
10.2 Epidemiology
- Prevalence: 2–33/100,000 (community); higher in epilepsy monitoring units
- 20–30% of patients referred to epilepsy monitoring units have PNES
- 10–30% of PNES patients also have comorbid epilepsy (dual diagnosis), critical point
- Sex: Female:male ratio ~3:1 to 7:1
- Age of onset: Bimodal, adolescence and 30s
- Misdiagnosis duration: Average 7 years before correct diagnosis
10.3 Differentiating Epileptic Seizures from PNES
The gold standard for diagnosis is Video-EEG telemetry with a captured event. No other test is definitive. Know the clinical features, but know the gold standard.
Gold Standard: Video-EEG monitoring with ictal EEG recording (or absence of EEG change during typical event)
Clinical Differentiators:
| Feature | Epileptic Seizure (TLE/GTC) | PNES |
|---|---|---|
| Onset | Sudden, stereotyped | Gradual, variable |
| Duration | Usually < 3 min | Often prolonged (>3–5 min) |
| Motor features | Stereotyped, rhythmic (GTC), automatisms (TLE) | Asynchronous, thrashing, pelvic thrusting, opisthotonus |
| Side-to-side head movement | Rare | Common (positive likelihood ratio ~8) |
| Eye position | Open, deviated (GTC); blank (TLE) | Closed; resistance to opening eyes |
| Ictal crying/weeping | Very rare | Common |
| Responsiveness | Absent (if impaired awareness) | Variable, sometimes present even in apparent unconsciousness |
| Postictal confusion | Prominent, prolonged | Minimal or absent |
| Self-injury | Common (tongue bite, lateral; falls) | Tongue bite rare (tip not lateral); rare falls |
| Incontinence | Common in GTC | Less common |
| Recall | Absent for GTC | May have partial recall |
| Triggers | Sleep deprivation, alcohol, illness | Psychosocial stressors, trauma contexts, sometimes suggestion |
| Witnesses | Irrelevant | Often occurs with audience |
| Ictal prolactin | Elevated 10–20 min post-GTC/CPS | Not elevated |
| Postictal EEG | Slowing | Normal |
Semiology features suggesting PNES:
- Pelvic thrusting (though not specific)
- Forward pelvic thrusting (more specific for PNES)
- Opisthotonus (arc de cercle)
- Bicycling leg movements
- Atypical motor features (e.g., gradual onset, build-up)
- Eye closure and resistance
- Crying during or immediately after event
- Out-of-phase limb movements
- Prolonged duration
Semiology features suggesting epilepsy:
- Stereotypy across events
- Brief duration (< 3 minutes)
- Postictal confusion
- Todd's paralysis (postictal focal weakness)
- Lateral tongue bite
- Clear postictal coma
10.4 Investigation
| Investigation | Finding in PNES | Finding in Epilepsy |
|---|---|---|
| Video-EEG (gold standard) | Normal EEG during event | Epileptiform discharge or generalised change |
| Interictal EEG | Usually normal (may have non-specific changes) | May show epileptiform discharges |
| Serum prolactin (20 min post-event) | Not elevated | Elevated after GTC/CPS (not absence) |
| CK | May rise with intense PNES | Rises significantly after GTC |
| MRI brain | Usually normal | May show structural lesion |
| Neuropsychological testing | May reveal dissociative features | Cognitive profile depends on syndrome |
Note on prolactin: Not reliable enough alone. Sensitivity 60%; specificity 96% for GTC/CPS (not absence, frontal, or postictal period > 60 min). Use only as adjunct.
10.5 Psychiatric Comorbidity in PNES
10.6 Management of PNES
Disclosing the diagnosis is therapeutic, but HOW it is disclosed matters enormously. The wrong approach drives patients away. Know the communication framework.
Step 1, Establish diagnosis definitively (Video-EEG)
Step 2, Communicating the diagnosis:
- Lead with what it IS, not what it isn't: "Your spells are a type of functional neurological disorder..."
- Do NOT say: "It's all in your head" or "There's nothing wrong with you"
- Emphasise: Real symptoms, not faking, treatable
- Acknowledge the diagnostic journey
- Explain the diagnosis as a brain-body communication problem (mind-brain framework)
- Joint consultation (neurologist + psychiatrist ideally)
Step 3, Psychiatric treatment:
- Psychotherapy: CBT with seizure-specific components (strongest evidence); trauma-focused therapy if PTSD; EMDR; psychodynamic
- Treat comorbidities: Depression, PTSD, anxiety, standard treatments
- Address iatrogenic harm: Many patients have been overmedicated with AEDs, suffered AED side effects; gradual AED withdrawal after diagnosis (if no comorbid epilepsy)
- Physiotherapy/rehabilitation: For functional neurological disorder comorbidities
Step 4, Withdrawal of AEDs (if no comorbid epilepsy):
- Gradual, not abrupt
- Done jointly with neurology
- Expect potential short-term worsening of PNES (extinction burst)
- Long-term: AED withdrawal reduces PNES burden in many patients
Prognosis:
- 30–40% remit completely with treatment
- 50% improve substantially
- Poorer prognosis: Longer duration of misdiagnosis, comorbid personality disorder, secondary gain, multiple comorbidities
SECTION 11: EEG IN PSYCHIATRY
11.1 Normal EEG Rhythms
| Rhythm | Frequency | Location | State |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alpha (α) | 8–13 Hz | Occipital, posterior | Relaxed, eyes closed; blocks with eye opening |
| Beta (β) | 13–30 Hz | Frontocentral | Alert, active mental activity; drugs (benzos) |
| Theta (θ) | 4–7 Hz | Temporal, frontal | Drowsiness; normal in children; frontotemporal TLE |
| Delta (δ) | 0.5–3 Hz | Diffuse | Deep sleep; pathological if awake (focal or diffuse) |
| Gamma (γ) | >30 Hz | Widespread | Cognitive processing; being studied |
| Mu (μ) | 8–13 Hz | Central (Rolandic) | Motor cortex at rest; blocks with movement |
Normal variants (not epileptiform):
- Wicket spikes: Benign temporal variant
- SREDA (subclinical rhythmic EEG discharges of adults)
- 14 and 6 Hz positive bursts
- Benign epileptiform transients of sleep (BETS/BETS)
- Hypnagogic hypersynchrony (children)
11.2 Epileptiform Discharges
| Pattern | Description | Associated Condition |
|---|---|---|
| Interictal epileptiform discharges (IEDs) | Spikes (< 70 ms), sharp waves (70–200 ms), isolated | Focal or generalised epilepsy |
| 3 Hz spike-wave | Regular, generalised | Childhood absence epilepsy |
| Hypsarrhythmia | Chaotic, high-amplitude, asynchronous | West syndrome |
| Slow spike-wave (< 2.5 Hz) | Diffuse, slow | Lennox-Gastaut |
| Polyspike-wave | Multiple spikes + slow wave | JME and other myoclonic epilepsies |
| Focal spike-wave | Temporal, frontal, etc. | Focal epilepsy |
| PLEDS (Periodic Lateralised Epileptiform Discharges) | Unilateral, periodic | Acute brain damage (HSV encephalitis, stroke) |
| GPEDS (Generalised Periodic Epileptiform Discharges) | Bilateral, periodic | CJD, anoxic encephalopathy, NCSE |
| Ictal EEG | Clear evolution of frequency and amplitude | Seizure activity |
11.3 EEG in Psychiatric Conditions
Delirium = diffuse slowing on EEG. This is the most clinically important EEG finding in a psychiatry inpatient setting. When a patient's sensorium is fluctuating acutely on your ward, EEG can help distinguish delirium (diffuse slowing) from NCSE (epileptiform activity) from functional/psychiatric (normal EEG).
11.4 Indications for EEG in Psychiatry
SECTION 12: STATUS EPILEPTICUS
12.1 Definition and Classification
The 2015 ILAE definition changed the threshold. Know the operational definition: 5 minutes for convulsive SE, 10 minutes for absence SE. This replaced the old "30 minutes" definition.
ILAE 2015 Operational Definitions:
| SE Type | Operational Definition (T1) | Functional Definition (T2) |
|---|---|---|
| Convulsive SE | ≥ 5 minutes of seizure activity | ≥ 30 minutes (long-term consequences) |
| Absence SE | ≥ 10 minutes | ≥ 30 minutes |
| Focal SE with impaired awareness | ≥ 10 minutes | ≥ 60 minutes |
Classification of SE:
| Type | Features | Psychiatric Relevance |
|---|---|---|
| Convulsive (Generalised Tonic-Clonic SE) | Overt motor manifestations; most common | Medical emergency; post-SE depression/psychosis common |
| Non-convulsive SE (NCSE) | Altered awareness without overt convulsions; EEG-confirmed | Can present as acute psychosis, psychiatric emergency |
| Absence SE | Continuous absence; subtle behaviour change | Misdiagnosed as psychiatric; patient appears "spacey" |
| Focal SE with impaired awareness | Previously complex partial SE | TLE-related; prolonged confusional states |
| Refractory SE | Not responding to first and second-line AEDs | ICU management |
| Super-refractory SE | Ongoing ≥ 24h despite general anaesthesia | Extremely high morbidity/mortality |
12.2 Management Protocol for Convulsive SE
Time-based Protocol:
0–5 min (Stabilisation Phase):
- ABC, oxygen, IV access, glucose (check and treat if low)
- Blood: FBC, EUC, glucose, LFTs, AED levels, toxicology
- Position: Recovery position if no spinal injury concern
- Do NOT restrain
5–20 min (First-line, Benzodiazepines):
- Lorazepam IV 0.1 mg/kg (max 4 mg per dose); preferred if IV access
- Diazepam IV 0.2 mg/kg (max 10 mg)
- Midazolam IM/buccal/intranasal 10 mg, if no IV access (equivalent efficacy)
- Can repeat once after 5–10 minutes if seizure continues
20–40 min (Second-line, Non-benzodiazepine):
- Levetiracetam IV 60 mg/kg (max 4500 mg), now often first choice for second-line
- Valproate IV 40 mg/kg (max 3000 mg), avoid in hepatic disease, pregnancy, mitochondrial disease
- Phenytoin IV 20 mg/kg (max 1500 mg), fosphenytoin preferred if available; cardiac monitoring needed
- Lacosamide IV, emerging second-line option
40–60 min (Third-line, Refractory SE):
- ICU transfer
- Anaesthetic agents: Midazolam infusion, propofol, thiopental, ketamine
- EEG monitoring (continuous)
- Burst suppression target
12.3 NCSE: Psychiatric Presentation
Why NCSE Is a Psychiatric Emergency:
NCSE can present with:
- Acute onset psychosis
- Fluctuating consciousness
- Bizarre behaviour
- Mutism
- Automatic behaviour with post-event amnesia
Red Flags for NCSE in a Psychiatric Setting:
- Known epilepsy history
- Fluctuating, not continuous symptoms
- Subtle motor features (lip smacking, eye blinking, subtle facial twitching)
- Amnesia for the episode
- Impaired response to commands despite apparent wakefulness
- EEG-confirmed (required for diagnosis)
Management: IV benzodiazepine diagnostic trial; AED optimisation; treat underlying cause
SECTION 13: EPILEPSY SURGERY AND PSYCHIATRIC OUTCOMES
13.1 Surgical Options
| Surgery Type | Description | Best Candidate |
|---|---|---|
| Anterior temporal lobectomy (ATL) | Resection of anterior temporal lobe + hippocampus | MTLE with hippocampal sclerosis, best outcomes |
| Selective amygdalohippocampectomy (SAH) | More limited resection | Preserves more neocortex; comparable seizure outcomes |
| Lesionectomy | Removal of MRI-visible lesion | Tumour, cavernoma, cortical dysplasia |
| Hemispherectomy/hemispherotomy | Disconnection of hemisphere | Rasmussen's encephalitis, large unilateral lesions in children |
| Corpus callosotomy | Section of corpus callosum | Drop attacks in LGS; palliative |
| Vagal nerve stimulation (VNS) | Implantable device | Non-resectable; adjunctive |
| Deep brain stimulation (DBS) | Thalamic stimulation | Non-resectable; emerging |
| Responsive neurostimulation (RNS) | Closed-loop stimulation at seizure focus | Emerging |
13.2 Psychiatric Outcomes Post-Surgery
Surgery does NOT reliably improve psychiatric comorbidity. In fact, de novo psychiatric disorders can emerge post-surgery. This is frequently tested.
Post-ATL Psychiatric Outcomes:
Predictors of Good Post-Surgery Psychiatric Outcome:
- Absence of pre-surgical psychiatric disorder
- High baseline IQ
- Seizure freedom achieved
- Strong social support
- Younger age at surgery
Predictors of Poor Psychiatric Outcome:
- Pre-existing depression or psychosis
- History of postictal psychosis
- Bilateral foci
- Right temporal resection (some studies suggest higher depression risk)
- Failure to achieve seizure freedom
Pre-surgical psychiatric assessment:
- Mandatory in most epilepsy surgery centres
- Wada test (intracarotid amobarbital test): Assesses language lateralisation and memory function of each temporal lobe separately
- Neuropsychological assessment: Predicts post-operative cognitive change
- Structured psychiatric interview: Identifies risk factors for post-surgical psychiatric complications
SECTION 14: WOMEN WITH EPILEPSY
14.1 Teratogenicity of AEDs
Teratogenicity is a major exam topic. Know the hierarchy, valproate is the most teratogenic. Neural tube defects are the hallmark of valproate/carbamazepine. Lamotrigine has the lowest risk of major congenital malformations among common AEDs.
Relative Teratogenicity:
| AED | Major Congenital Malformation Rate | Key Malformations | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Valproate | ~10–11% | Neural tube defects (NTD: 1–2%), cardiovascular, orofacial clefts, hypospadias, limb defects | HIGHEST RISK; also neurodevelopmental, IQ loss, autism risk |
| Carbamazepine | ~2–3% | NTD (0.5%), cardiovascular, orofacial clefts | Dose-dependent |
| Phenobarbital | ~5–7% | Cardiovascular, orofacial, digital defects | |
| Phenytoin | ~3–7% | Fetal hydantoin syndrome (NTDs, hypoplastic nails/fingers, dysmorphic facies) | |
| Lamotrigine | ~2% | Orofacial clefts (slight increase in some registries) | Lowest overall risk; safer option |
| Levetiracetam | ~2–3% | No specific pattern; limited data | Relatively new; emerging evidence |
| Topiramate | ~3–9% | Orofacial clefts | Avoid in first trimester |
| Oxcarbazepine | ~3–4% | Cardiovascular, NTDs |
Valproate-specific developmental effects:
- IQ: Children exposed to valproate in utero have ~7–9 point lower IQ on average vs. unexposed
- Autism risk: ~6x higher
- ADHD: Increased risk
- Language and verbal abilities: Specifically impaired
- These effects are independent of major structural malformations
Folic acid supplementation:
- ALL women with epilepsy on AEDs planning pregnancy: High-dose folic acid 5 mg/day (not 0.4 mg)
- Start at least 3 months before conception
- Continue through first trimester at minimum
- Reduces (but does not eliminate) NTD risk
14.2 Contraception and AEDs
Enzyme-inducing AEDs reduce efficacy of combined oral contraceptives. This is clinically important, unintended pregnancy on an AED is a serious issue.
14.3 Pregnancy and Epilepsy
Pre-conception counselling:
- Confirm diagnosis, is epilepsy definite?
- Review AED choice, switch from valproate if possible
- High-dose folate started pre-conception
- Consider AED monotherapy at lowest effective dose
- Discuss risks openly, untreated seizures also harm foetus
Changes during pregnancy:
- AED levels often fall due to: Increased volume of distribution, renal clearance, decreased protein binding
- Lamotrigine: Levels fall significantly in pregnancy; increase dose with monitoring
- Levetiracetam: Levels also fall; monitor
- Seizure frequency may increase due to: Sleep deprivation, AED level changes, hormonal changes, medication non-compliance
Delivery:
- Vaginal delivery: Preferred; risk of seizures during labour is low
- IV benzodiazepines: Available for rescue
- Vitamin K: Neonates should receive at delivery (AED enzyme induction reduces neonatal vitamin K)
Breastfeeding:
- Generally encouraged
- Most AEDs: Low concentrations in breast milk
- Exceptions: Phenobarbital, lamotrigine (significant amounts), monitor baby for sedation
- Valproate, carbamazepine, levetiracetam: Relatively low breast milk levels; generally safe
14.4 Catamenial Epilepsy
Definition: Epilepsy with seizures clustering around menstrual cycle, defined as ≥2x increase in seizure frequency in specific cycle phase vs. baseline.
Three patterns (Herzog):
- Perimenstrual (C1): Seizure cluster around menstruation (days -3 to +3)
- Periovulatory (C2): Seizure cluster around ovulation (days 10–13)
- Anovulatory (C3): Entire second half of cycle (days 10–28)
Mechanism: Estrogen (proconvulsant) increases; progesterone (anticonvulsant via GABA-A action) falls abruptly at menstruation
Treatment:
- Acetazolamide (carbonic anhydrase inhibitor): Perimenstrual use
- Clonazepam intermittently
- Progesterone supplementation (luteal phase support)
- OCP (continuous): Eliminates cycle variation
- Optimise baseline AED
SECTION 15: DRIVING AND EPILEPSY: INDIAN REGULATIONS
Indian driving regulations for epilepsy are distinct from UK/international guidelines. Know the seizure-free period requirements.
15.1 Indian Motor Vehicles Act: Epilepsy
Current Indian Regulations (Motor Vehicles Act 1988, Central Motor Vehicles Rules 1989):
- Epilepsy is a disqualifying condition for obtaining a driving licence under standard eligibility
- A person with epilepsy may be considered for driving licence if: Seizure-free for ≥ 2 years (on or off medication)
- This is different from the UK (1 year seizure-free) and many Western countries
Practical Clinical Advice:
- Always document seizure-free dates in records
- Counsel all patients about driving restrictions at diagnosis and at every follow-up
- Document that counselling was given (medicolegal protection)
- Report to licensing authority if a patient continues to drive against advice (duty to protect third parties)
- Consider: Employment implications, alternative transport planning
15.2 Fitness to Drive: Clinical Assessment
Factors Affecting Driving Clearance:
- Type of seizure (absence vs. GTC vs. nocturnal-only)
- Seizure-free duration
- AED compliance and stability
- Occupational vs. private driving (higher standard for commercial/HGV)
- Prodromal warning (if adequate warning, some jurisdictions allow driving)
Nocturnal Seizures Only:
In many guidelines (UK, India provisions): If seizures are exclusively nocturnal for ≥ 3 years, driving may be permitted. Discuss with licensing authority.
SECTION 16: SPECIAL TOPICS
16.1 Psychiatric Disorders in Epilepsy: Summary Framework
Using the Temporal Framework (critical for MCQs):
16.2 Cognitive Impairment in Epilepsy
Sources of Cognitive Impairment:
16.3 Limbic Encephalitis: Epilepsy-Psychiatry Crossover
Limbic encephalitis (LE) is the key differential diagnosis when new-onset TLE presents with psychiatric symptoms, especially in younger patients without prior epilepsy history.
Types of Limbic Encephalitis:
| Type | Antibody | Psychiatric Features | Seizure Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anti-NMDAR encephalitis | Anti-GluN1 (NR1) | Psychosis, behavioural disturbance, catatonia | Focal and generalised; can progress to SE |
| Anti-LGI1 encephalitis | Anti-LGI1 | Memory impairment, psychiatric symptoms, hyponatraemia | Faciobrachial dystonic seizures (FBDS), pathognomonic |
| Anti-CASPR2 | Anti-CASPR2 | Amnesia, behavioural changes, neuropathic pain | Less prominent seizures |
| Anti-GABA-B | Anti-GABA-B | Less psychiatric; more classical LE | Temporal lobe seizures, frequent |
| Paraneoplastic (anti-Hu, Yo, Ma2) | Various | Memory impairment, personality change | Multifocal |
Anti-NMDAR Encephalitis, Know this:
- Most common autoimmune encephalitis
- Young women; associated with ovarian teratoma (40%)
- Sequence: Psychiatric phase → seizures → movement disorders → autonomic instability → coma
- MRI: Often normal initially; may show FLAIR changes
- CSF: Pleocytosis; CSF antibody more sensitive than serum
- Treatment: Immunotherapy (steroids, IVIG, plasmapheresis) + tumour removal; antipsychotics for safety
- Antipsychotics may worsen movement disorder phase, use cautiously
SECTION 17: QUICK REFERENCE TABLES
Table 1: Key Syndromes Summary
| Syndrome | Age | Key EEG | Psychiatric Relevance | AED of Choice |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAE | 4–12 | 3 Hz SWD | ADHD-like, misdiagnosis | Ethosuximide, VPA |
| JME | 12–18 | 4–6 Hz polyspike-wave | ADHD, impulsivity | VPA, LEV, LTG |
| West | 3–12 mo | Hypsarrhythmia | ASD, ID | ACTH, Vigabatrin |
| LGS | 1–7 y | Slow SWD <2.5 Hz | ID, aggression, ASD | VPA, LTG, Clobazam |
| TLE | Any | Temporal spikes, rhythmic | Full psychiatric spectrum | CBZ, VPA, LEV, LTG |
Table 2: AED Psychiatric Effects: Quick Reference
Table 3: Psychosis Timing in Epilepsy
| Type | Timing | Key Feature | Duration |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ictal | During seizure | EEG-confirmed discharge | Seconds-minutes |
| Forced normalisation | After seizure control | Paradoxical EEG normalisation | Days-weeks |
| Postictal | 24–48h post-seizure | Lucid interval | Days-weeks |
| Interictal (SLPE) | Independent of seizures | Preserved affect/warmth | Months-years |
| *References: Kaplan & Sadock's Comprehensive Textbook of Psychiatry, 10th ed. | Trimble MR, Schmitz B, Neuropsychiatry of Epilepsy, 2nd ed. | Engel J, Pedley TA, Epilepsy: A Comprehensive Textbook | Oxford Textbook of Epilepsy and Epileptic Seizures | Stahl's Essential Psychopharmacology, 5th ed.* |
|---|
Model Answers
Sources: Kaplan & Sadock 10th ed., Trimble's Neuropsychiatry of Epilepsy, Oxford Textbook of Epilepsy, Stahl's 5th ed.
Each answer below is structured for a 10-mark long answer. Target 2 A4 pages in the exam. Use the heading structure, examiners follow a marking key. Write definitions first, tables/lists over prose, end with clinical implications or management.
Answer 1: Classify seizures according to ILAE 2017. Describe the psychiatric relevance of temporal lobe epilepsy.
Introduction
The International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) 2017 classification revised the terminology of seizure types, abandoning older terms such as "simple partial" and "complex partial." It operates at three hierarchical levels: seizure type, epilepsy type, and epilepsy syndrome. (1 mark)
ILAE 2017 Seizure Classification (3 marks)
Level 1, Seizure Onset:
| Onset Type | Subtypes | Former Term |
|---|---|---|
| Focal | Aware; Impaired Awareness; Focal to bilateral tonic-clonic | Simple partial; Complex partial; Secondary generalised |
| Generalised | Motor (tonic-clonic, tonic, clonic, myoclonic, atonic, spasms); Non-motor (absence: typical, atypical, myoclonic, eyelid) | Grand mal; Petit mal |
| Unknown | Motor (tonic-clonic, spasms); Non-motor (behaviour arrest) |
Level 2, Epilepsy Type: Focal, Generalised, Combined focal + generalised, Unknown.
Level 3, Epilepsy Syndrome: e.g., TLE, JME, Childhood absence epilepsy, West syndrome, Lennox-Gastaut.
Temporal Lobe Epilepsy (TLE): Overview (1 mark)
TLE is the most common focal epilepsy (60% of focal epilepsies). Mesial TLE (MTLE) arising from the hippocampus, amygdala, and parahippocampal gyrus is the most psychiatrically significant variant. Aura typically includes epigastric rising, fear, deja vu/jamais vu, olfactory/gustatory hallucinations. Automatisms (oral, manual) and postictal confusion are characteristic.
Psychiatric Relevance of TLE (4 marks)
1. Depression (30–50% prevalence):
Most common psychiatric comorbidity in TLE. The relationship is bidirectional, TLE doubles depression risk, and depression is independently associated with increased seizure frequency. Mechanism involves serotonergic and limbic disruption. NDDI-E (Neurological Disorders Depression Inventory for Epilepsy) is the validated screening tool (cutoff ≥15).
2. Psychosis, Interictal (Schizophrenia-Like Psychosis of Epilepsy, SLPE):
Prevalence 5–10%. Described by Slater and Beard (1963). Key features: positive symptoms (hallucinations, delusions) WITHOUT prominent negative symptoms; preserved affect ("warmth"); no family history of schizophrenia. Develops 10–15 years after epilepsy onset on average.
3. Postictal Psychosis:
Occurs 24–48 hours after a seizure cluster (the "lucid interval" is pathognomonic). Duration: days to weeks. Features often include elevated mood, religious ideation, both visual and auditory hallucinations. Managed with low-dose antipsychotics; self-limiting in most cases.
4. Geschwind Syndrome (Interictal Personality Changes):
Cluster of personality traits: hypergraphia, hyperreligiosity, hyposexuality, viscosity (circumstantiality, "stickiness"), deepened affect. Existence as a distinct syndrome is debated but remains testable content.
5. Ictal Phenomena:
Ictal fear (most common ictal emotion, amygdala origin), ictal psychosis (rare, EEG-confirmed), forced normalisation (psychosis paradoxically emerging when seizures are controlled, Landolt, 1953).
6. Anxiety: 25–40% prevalence; includes ictal fear, anticipatory anxiety, and interictal generalised anxiety. Panic attacks must be distinguished from ictal fear (brevity, stereotypy, EEG correlation).
Clinical Implications (1 mark)
Any new-onset psychosis or atypical psychiatric presentation, especially if episodic, brief, stereotyped, associated with memory symptoms or olfactory aura, warrants EEG and neurological evaluation. Non-convulsive status epilepticus presenting as acute psychosis is a psychiatric emergency.
Answer 2: Discuss postictal psychosis: features, pathophysiology, and management.
Definition (1 mark)
Postictal psychosis (PIP) is a transient psychotic episode emerging after a cluster of seizures, characterised by a lucid interval of 24–48 hours between the seizure(s) and the onset of psychosis. It occurs in 7–10% of patients with TLE and represents one of the most clinically significant peri-ictal psychiatric syndromes.
Epidemiology (0.5 marks)
- Prevalence: 7–10% of TLE patients
- Risk factors: Bilateral seizure foci, long duration of epilepsy (>10 years), history of febrile convulsions, prior PIP episodes (strongest predictor), male sex, dominant temporal focus
Clinical Features (3 marks)
Pathophysiology (2 marks)
The mechanism of PIP is incompletely understood. Proposed mechanisms include:
- Forced normalisation: Seizure activity may temporarily modulate limbic dopaminergic tone. When seizures cease, this modulating effect is removed, allowing dopaminergic dysregulation to emerge as psychosis. EEG normalisation during PIP supports this model.
- Transient dopaminergic hyperactivity: Post-seizure rebound dopamine release in mesolimbic pathways.
- GABA/glutamate shift: Postictal GABAergic inhibition followed by glutamatergic rebound → neuronal hyperexcitability in limbic circuits without convulsive threshold.
- Structural substrate: Bilateral hippocampal and amygdala pathology in patients with bilateral foci increases risk; suggests an anatomical vulnerability.
- Immune/inflammatory: Postictal neuroinflammation has been proposed; blood-brain barrier disruption following clusters of seizures may allow inflammatory mediators to trigger psychosis.
Management (3 marks)
Immediate:
- Safety assessment, risk to self and others
- Observation in a calm, low-stimulation environment
- Ensure family/carers aware (lucid interval phenomenon must be explained)
Pharmacological:
- Low-dose antipsychotic: Haloperidol 2–5 mg/day OR olanzapine 5–10 mg/day
- Benzodiazepine: For agitation (lorazepam 1–2 mg)
- Avoid: Clozapine (highest proconvulsant risk), high-dose typical antipsychotics
- Duration: Short-term (1–4 weeks typically sufficient)
AED Optimisation:
- Long-term reduction of seizure frequency reduces recurrence risk
- Review AED regimen; add or increase if poorly controlled
Psychoeducation:
- Explain the lucid interval, families and carers often misinterpret apparent recovery as full resolution
- Written crisis plan for future episodes
Follow-up:
- Monitor for progression to chronic interictal psychosis (~15% risk with recurrent PIP)
- Long-term antipsychotic generally NOT required after a single episode; consider prophylaxis after 2+ episodes
Prognosis (0.5 marks)
Most episodes are self-limiting within 2 weeks. With repeated episodes (3+), risk of persistent interictal psychosis rises to ~15%. Early recognition, adequate treatment, and seizure control are the primary modifiable factors.
Answer 3: Describe the schizophrenia-like psychosis of epilepsy. How does it differ from schizophrenia?
Introduction (1 mark)
Slater and Beard (1963) first systematically described a schizophrenia-like psychosis occurring in patients with epilepsy that differed from idiopathic schizophrenia in several important ways. Now termed "Interictal Psychosis" or "Schizophrenia-Like Psychosis of Epilepsy (SLPE)," it represents the most common form of chronic psychosis in epilepsy, occurring in 5–10% of temporal lobe epilepsy patients.
Epidemiology (0.5 marks)
- Prevalence in TLE: 5–10%
- Overall risk in epilepsy: 6–12x higher than general population
- Onset: Typically 10–15 years after epilepsy onset (mean age ~30–35 years)
- More common in MTLE, bilateral foci, alien tissue lesions (ganglioglioma, DNET, hamartoma)
Clinical Features of SLPE (3 marks)
Positive Symptoms (prominent):
- Auditory hallucinations, voices (similar to schizophrenia)
- Delusions, often persecutory, religious, grandiose
- Passivity phenomena (first rank symptoms may be present)
Negative Symptoms (characteristically ABSENT or mild):
- Flat affect: Rare in SLPE, affect is PRESERVED and often WARM
- Alogia: Not prominent
- Avolition/anhedonia: Mild at most
- Social withdrawal: Less severe than schizophrenia
Other Features:
- Mood congruent features may be present (elevation, dysphoria)
- Paranoid > disorganised presentations
- Preserved social functioning (relatively)
- No family history of schizophrenia
- Premorbid functioning often normal
Comparison: SLPE vs. Schizophrenia (4 marks)
| Feature | SLPE | Schizophrenia |
|---|---|---|
| Positive symptoms | Prominent | Prominent |
| Negative symptoms | Mild or absent, KEY | Often prominent, progressive |
| Affect | Preserved, warm, KEY | Often blunted/flat |
| Social deterioration | Mild | More severe |
| Formal thought disorder | Less severe | Common, prominent |
| Family history of psychosis | Not elevated | Elevated |
| Premorbid function | Often normal | Often impaired |
| Onset timing | After 10–15 yr of epilepsy | Early adulthood, no seizure trigger |
| Duration | Chronic if untreated | Chronic |
| First rank symptoms | May be present | Characteristic |
| Religious content | Often prominent | Less specific |
| Response to antipsychotics | Yes | Yes |
| Catatonia | Rare | Possible |
| Neuropathology | TLE substrate (hippocampal sclerosis) | Diffuse changes (reduced grey matter) |
| Neurodevelopmental basis | Epilepsy + kindling | Strong neurodevelopmental model |
Pathophysiology (1 mark)
Four mechanisms are proposed:
- Kindling: Repeated subthreshold limbic stimulation produces permanent neuronal sensitisation leading to psychotic vulnerability
- Structural: Hippocampal, parahippocampal, and amygdala atrophy disrupts limbic-dopamine regulation
- Dopaminergic dysregulation: Secondary to limbic epileptiform activity
- Shared neurodevelopmental substrate: Common vulnerability for both epilepsy and psychosis (e.g., perinatal injury, genetic factors)
Management (0.5 marks)
- Atypical antipsychotics: Aripiprazole (lowest proconvulsant risk), risperidone, olanzapine
- Continue AEDs, never reduce AED with the expectation that this will help psychosis
- Do NOT use clozapine unless treatment-resistant (highest seizure risk)
- Monitor EEG if clozapine is required
Answer 4: Discuss the role of AEDs in psychiatric disorders. Describe the psychiatric side effects of antiepileptic drugs.
Introduction (1 mark)
Antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) occupy a unique position in neuropsychopharmacology, several are used as primary treatments in psychiatric disorders (valproate, carbamazepine, lamotrigine) while others carry significant risks of inducing or worsening psychiatric symptoms. Understanding both dimensions is essential for safe practice at the neurology-psychiatry interface.
AEDs as Psychiatric Treatments (3 marks)
Valproate:
- Bipolar disorder I, acute mania: First-line (equivalent to lithium)
- Bipolar maintenance: Effective, especially for rapid cycling
- Schizoaffective disorder: Augmentation
- Impulse control disorders, aggression in intellectual disability
- Mechanism: GABAergic enhancement + sodium channel blockade + multiple downstream effects
Carbamazepine:
- Bipolar disorder: Second-line; particularly dysphoric mania, rapid cycling
- Acute mania: Less evidence than valproate/lithium but used
- Trigeminal neuralgia, PTSD augmentation
- Mechanism: Sodium channel blockade; structural resemblance to TCAs
Lamotrigine:
- Bipolar depression: Best evidence among all drugs for bipolar depression maintenance
- NOT first-line for acute mania; may precipitate mixed states
- Mechanism: Sodium + calcium channel blockade; reduces glutamatergic transmission
Clonazepam:
- Panic disorder, social anxiety (short-term)
- Acute mania (adjunct)
- Catatonia (IV lorazepam/diazepam)
Pregabalin/Gabapentin:
- Generalised anxiety disorder (pregabalin is licensed for GAD in Europe)
- Neuropathic pain comorbid with psychiatric disorders
Psychiatric Side Effects of AEDs (5 marks)
| AED | Primary Psychiatric Side Effects | Severity |
|---|---|---|
| Levetiracetam | Irritability, aggression, depression, psychosis (~10% affected) | High, most common psychiatric SE of newer AEDs |
| Topiramate | Cognitive impairment (word-finding, processing speed, "Dopamax"), depression, suicidality | High, cognitive effects very significant |
| Phenobarbital | Depression, cognitive impairment, hyperactivity (children), dependence | High, worst for depression |
| Vigabatrin | Depression, psychosis, forced normalisation | High |
| Zonisamide | Depression, cognitive effects, irritability | Moderate |
| Perampanel | Aggression, hostility, irritability (dose-dependent) | Moderate |
| Valproate | Mild sedation, cognitive dulling at high doses | Low-moderate |
| Carbamazepine | Mild sedation; hyponatraemia can cause confusion | Low-moderate |
| Lamotrigine | Insomnia, activation; rarely psychosis (with forced normalisation) | Low |
| Phenytoin | Cognitive impairment at toxic levels | Low at therapeutic levels |
| Lacosamide | Minimal psychiatric effects | Low |
FDA 2008 Black Box Warning:
All AEDs carry a class warning for increased suicidality. Risk approximately doubles (from ~0.24% to 0.43% over study periods). The absolute risk is small but clinically relevant, monitor all patients starting AEDs for mood and suicidal ideation.
Levetiracetam, Psychiatric Effects (detailed):
Dose-dependent irritability and behavioural disinhibition in ~10% of patients. Thought to relate to SV2A binding modulating inhibitory neurotransmitter release. Adjunctive pyridoxine (Vitamin B6) has limited evidence for reducing irritability. Dose reduction or drug switch is the primary intervention.
Topiramate, Cognitive Effects (detailed):
Word-finding difficulty (anomia) is most characteristic. Processing speed and working memory also affected. Severity is dose-dependent, much less problematic at ≤100 mg/day. Labelled "Dopamax" by patients and clinicians colloquially. Cognitive testing before and after dose escalation is good practice.
Clinical Implications (1 mark)
When a patient with epilepsy presents with new psychiatric symptoms, always review:
- Recent AED changes (new AED, dose increase)
- AED interactions (enzyme induction reducing psychotropic levels)
- Seizure control (improvement may trigger forced normalisation)
- Temporal relationship (within weeks of AED change = likely AED-related)
Answer 5: Describe psychogenic non-epileptic seizures (PNES). How are they differentiated from epileptic seizures? Discuss management.
Definition and Terminology (1 mark)
Psychogenic Non-Epileptic Seizures (PNES), also termed functional seizures, are paroxysmal events resembling epileptic seizures in clinical appearance but occurring without the ictal neurophysiological changes (epileptiform EEG activity) characteristic of epilepsy. They represent a form of Functional Neurological Disorder (FND). The term "pseudoseizures" is outdated and stigmatising, it implies voluntary fabrication, which is incorrect.
Epidemiology (0.5 marks)
- Prevalence: 2–33/100,000 in community settings
- 20–30% of patients in epilepsy monitoring units have PNES
- 10–30% of PNES patients also have comorbid epilepsy
- Female:male ratio: 3:1 to 7:1
- Average delay to diagnosis: 7 years
- Average number of AEDs tried before diagnosis: 2–3
Differentiation: PNES vs. Epileptic Seizures (4 marks)
Gold standard: Video-EEG telemetry with a recorded typical event.
| Feature | PNES | Epileptic Seizure |
|---|---|---|
| Onset | Gradual, build-up | Abrupt, stereotyped |
| Duration | Prolonged (often >3–5 min) | Usually <3 min |
| Eye position during event | Closed (resistant to opening) | Open, may be deviated |
| Motor features | Asynchronous, thrashing, pelvic thrusting, opisthotonus | Rhythmic (GTC), stereotyped automatisms (TLE) |
| Side-to-side head movement | Common | Rare |
| Ictal crying/weeping | Common | Very rare |
| Responsiveness | May be partially present | Absent in GTC/CPS |
| Tongue bite | Rare; tip of tongue | Lateral tongue bite |
| Incontinence | Uncommon | Common (GTC) |
| Postictal confusion | Minimal/absent | Prolonged (>30 min in GTC) |
| Recall | Partial often present | Absent for GTC |
| Triggers | Psychosocial stressors | Sleep deprivation, alcohol, illness, hormonal |
| Audience effect | Events more common with observers | Not applicable |
| Serum prolactin (20 min post) | Not elevated | Elevated post-GTC/CPS |
| EEG during event | Normal | Ictal discharge or generalised change |
| Postictal EEG | Normal | Slowing |
| CK after event | Variable, usually normal | Elevated post-GTC |
Semiology features strongly suggesting PNES:
- Asynchronous limb movements (arms and legs out of phase)
- Pelvic thrusting, especially forward thrusting
- Opisthotonus (arc de cercle)
- Eye closure with resistance
- Crying during or immediately after
- Gradual onset with emotional build-up
- Duration >5 minutes with preserved partial awareness
Psychiatric Comorbidity (1.5 marks)
Management (3 marks)
Step 1, Definitive Diagnosis:
Video-EEG monitoring with captured event. Do not diagnose PNES on clinical grounds alone, the consequences of misdiagnosis are severe (either undertreated epilepsy or continued AED treatment in non-epileptic patients).
Step 2, Disclosure:
Delivery of the diagnosis is the first therapeutic act. Framework:
- Lead with what it IS: "Your brain is experiencing a type of functional nervous system difficulty..."
- Do NOT say: "It's not real," "you're fine," "it's psychological" (pejorative framing)
- Frame as: Real, disabling, treatable, not deliberate
- Acknowledge diagnostic journey and prior misdiagnosis
- Involve a neurologist and psychiatrist jointly
Step 3, Psychotherapy (Primary Treatment):
- CBT: Strongest evidence; seizure-specific CBT (cognitive restructuring + behavioural experiments targeting triggers)
- Trauma-focused therapy: If PTSD is present, trauma-focused CBT, EMDR
- EMDR: Growing evidence for PNES with trauma history
- Psychodynamic therapy: For patients with poor insight into emotional triggers
- Group therapy: Reduces isolation, shame
Step 4, AED Withdrawal (if no comorbid epilepsy):
- Gradual, collaborative with neurology
- Expect short-term worsening (extinction burst), prepare patient
- Long-term: AED withdrawal generally beneficial; reduces AED side effects
Step 5, Treat Comorbidities:
- Antidepressants for depression (SSRIs first-line)
- Trauma-focused work for PTSD
- DBT skills for BPD features
Prognosis (0.5 marks)
- Seizure freedom: 30–40% with treatment
- Substantial improvement: 50%
- Poorer prognosis: Long diagnostic delay, secondary gain, comorbid personality disorder, continued AED use (maintains sick role), lack of insight
Answer 6: Write a note on forced normalisation. Describe Landolt's phenomenon with clinical implications.
Historical Background (1 mark)
Heinrich Landolt (1953), a Swiss neurologist, described a paradoxical EEG phenomenon in epilepsy patients: when seizures were controlled, either spontaneously or pharmacologically, the EEG, previously showing epileptiform activity, would normalise (become apparently normal). Simultaneously, patients would develop acute psychiatric symptoms, most commonly psychosis. He termed this "forced normalisation" (erzwungene Normalisierung in German), referring to the EEG finding.
Tellenbach (1965) described the clinical counterpart, "alternative psychosis", emphasising the competitive, alternating relationship between epileptic seizures and psychosis.
Definition (1 mark)
Forced normalisation (Landolt): The paradoxical normalisation of EEG coinciding with the emergence of acute psychiatric symptoms (most commonly psychosis) when epileptic activity is suppressed.
Alternative psychosis (Tellenbach): The clinical alternating relationship between seizures and psychosis, when one is present, the other is absent.
These terms are related but distinct: Forced normalisation is an EEG description; alternative psychosis is a clinical description of the same phenomenon.
Clinical Features (3 marks)
AEDs Most Commonly Associated (1 mark)
Pathophysiology (2 marks)
The mechanism is not fully established. Proposed models:
- Competing inhibition: Seizure activity itself may paradoxically inhibit psychotic mechanisms (perhaps via postictal dopamine modulation). When seizures are suppressed, this inhibitory effect is removed, unmasking psychotic vulnerability.
- Dopamine hypothesis: Seizures modulate mesolimbic dopamine tone. The anticonvulsant effect removes seizure-related dopaminergic modulation, allowing dopaminergic hyperactivity to emerge.
- GABA enhancement: Vigabatrin increases GABA by inhibiting GABA transaminase. Excess GABAergic inhibition in limbic circuits may disrupt psychotic threshold regulation.
- Limbic network rebalancing: Anticonvulsants shift the balance of excitation/inhibition across limbic networks; in vulnerable individuals, this rebalancing produces psychosis rather than normalcy.
Clinical Management (2 marks)
Step 1, Recognition: Clinician must know this phenomenon. Any acute psychosis emerging after seizure control (especially new AED or dose increase) should trigger assessment for forced normalisation.
Step 2, AED Reduction:
- Discuss with the treating neurologist
- Consider reducing the offending AED (especially vigabatrin, ethosuximide)
- The paradox: Allowing seizure recurrence may resolve psychosis
- Weigh seizure risk against psychiatric risk
Step 3, Antipsychotic:
- Low-dose antipsychotic for psychosis
- Avoid clozapine (increases seizure threshold paradoxically may help, but risk too high)
- Aripiprazole preferred (least proconvulsant)
Step 4, Monitor EEG:
- Serial EEG during psychotic episode
- Return of epileptiform activity often heralds resolution of psychosis
Key Clinical Principle: Do NOT automatically increase AED dose when psychosis emerges post-seizure control, this may worsen the psychiatric syndrome.
Answer 7: Discuss depression in epilepsy: prevalence, bidirectional relationship, screening, and treatment.
Introduction (0.5 marks)
Depression is the most common psychiatric comorbidity in epilepsy, affecting 20–55% of patients. It significantly impairs quality of life, often more than seizure frequency itself. The relationship between epilepsy and depression is uniquely bidirectional, reflecting shared neurobiological mechanisms.
Prevalence (0.5 marks)
- Overall in epilepsy: 20–55% (most consistent: ~30%)
- TLE specifically: 30–50%
- Drug-resistant epilepsy: Up to 55%
- Active seizures (vs. well-controlled): Higher prevalence
- Compared to general population (~10–15%): 2–4x higher
Bidirectional Relationship (3 marks)
This is a conceptually important exam topic, the relationship goes BOTH ways.
Epilepsy → Depression:
- Neurobiological: Limbic hyperactivity disrupts serotonergic circuits; HPA axis dysregulation; interictal hypometabolism in frontal and limbic regions
- AED effects: Phenobarbital, topiramate, levetiracetam, zonisamide directly increase depression risk
- Psychosocial: Driving restrictions, employment limitations, stigma, dependency, loss of autonomy
- Peri-ictal: Postictal depression (common after GTC) and interictal dysphoric disorder
Depression → Epilepsy:
- Meta-analyses show: Individuals with depression have RR of 1.5–2.0 for subsequently developing epilepsy
- Shared mechanisms: Serotonergic pathways, HPA axis dysregulation, hippocampal atrophy (depression causes hippocampal volume loss, same region vulnerable in MTLE)
- Neuroinflammation: Depression and epilepsy both associated with elevated inflammatory markers
Shared Neurobiology:
- Both involve: Serotonin, GABA, glutamate dysregulation
- Both associated with: Hippocampal atrophy, amygdala hyperactivity
- Both benefit from: Anticonvulsant mood stabilisers (lamotrigine, valproate)
Screening Tools (1.5 marks)
NDDI-E (Neurological Disorders Depression Inventory for Epilepsy):
- Validated specifically for epilepsy, avoids somatic items that overlap with AED side effects
- 6 items, each scored 1–4
- Cutoff ≥ 15: Probable MDD (sensitivity 81%, specificity 90%)
- Items: "Everything is a struggle," "Nothing I do is right," "Feel guilty," "I'd be better off dead," "Frustrated," "Difficulty finding pleasure"
- Preferred over PHQ-9 in epilepsy settings
GAD-7: Recommended for anxiety screening in epilepsy for the same reason.
Why not PHQ-9? Somatic items (sleep, fatigue, concentration, appetite) are confounded by AED side effects and postictal effects, inflates false positive rate.
Suicide Risk (1 mark)
- Suicide attempt rate: 5x higher than general population
- Completed suicide: 3–5x higher
- FDA 2008: All AEDs carry class black box warning for suicidality
- Risk factors: TLE, active depression, young male, drug-resistant epilepsy, recent diagnosis, social isolation
Treatment (3 marks)
Antidepressants:
| Drug | Recommendation | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| SSRIs (sertraline, escitalopram, citalopram) | First-line | Low seizure risk; escitalopram and sertraline safest for interactions |
| SNRIs (venlafaxine, duloxetine) | Second-line | Acceptable; low-moderate proconvulsant risk |
| Mirtazapine | Useful adjunct | Sedating; low seizure risk; helpful for insomnia |
| TCAs | Avoid | High proconvulsant risk |
| Bupropion | Contraindicated | Highest proconvulsant risk of all antidepressants |
| Clomipramine | Avoid | High risk |
Psychotherapy:
- CBT: Strong evidence; helps both depression and epilepsy adjustment
- IPT: Useful for interpersonal dimension of chronic illness adjustment
- Mindfulness-based CBT (MBCT): Growing evidence; particularly for relapse prevention
AED Optimisation:
- If AED is contributing (phenobarbital, topiramate, levetiracetam): Consider switching
- If seizure control is poor: Improving control often improves mood
Collaborative Care:
- Joint neuropsychiatry clinics are ideal
- Regular NDDI-E monitoring at follow-up
Interictal Dysphoric Disorder (0.5 marks)
Blumer's syndrome, intermittent dysphoria with eight symptoms (depressive: low mood, anergia, pain, insomnia; irritable: episodic fear, euphoria, irritability, paroxysmal affect). Does not map to DSM; may respond to SSRI + lamotrigine combination.
Answer 8: Discuss Women with Epilepsy (WWE): teratogenicity of AEDs, contraception, and pregnancy management.
Introduction (0.5 marks)
Women with epilepsy (WWE) face unique challenges at the intersection of reproductive health and neurological disease. Uncontrolled seizures during pregnancy carry foetal risks, while AEDs carry teratogenic risks. The clinical goal is to minimise seizure exposure and foetal drug exposure simultaneously, requiring careful pre-conception planning and ongoing monitoring.
Teratogenicity of AEDs (3.5 marks)
Background risk of major congenital malformation (MCM) in general population: ~1–2%.
| AED | MCM Rate | Specific Risks | Neurodevelopmental |
|---|---|---|---|
| Valproate | ~10–11% | Neural tube defects (1–2%), cardiac, orofacial clefts, limb anomalies, hypospadias | IQ −7–9 points; autism risk 6×; ADHD increased |
| Phenobarbital | ~5–7% | Cardiac, orofacial, digital defects | Cognitive effects (less data) |
| Phenytoin | ~3–7% | Fetal hydantoin syndrome: NTDs, hypoplastic nails, dysmorphic facies | Cognitive effects |
| Carbamazepine | ~2–3% | NTDs (0.5%), cardiovascular, orofacial | Less than valproate |
| Topiramate | ~3–9% | Orofacial clefts (strongly associated) | Limited data |
| Lamotrigine | ~2% | Orofacial clefts (slight increase in some registries) | Lowest overall neurodevelopmental risk |
| Levetiracetam | ~2–3% | No specific pattern; reassuring data accumulating | Limited long-term data |
| Oxcarbazepine | ~3–4% | Cardiovascular, NTDs | Less data |
Key valproate facts for exam:
- Highest structural AND neurodevelopmental teratogenicity
- Neurodevelopmental effects: Independent of structural malformations; dose-dependent
- MHRA 2018/2024: Valproate MUST NOT be used in women of childbearing potential without effective contraception and annual PREVENT review
- If valproate is absolutely necessary: Use minimum effective dose; folic acid 5 mg/day; detailed fetal anomaly scans
Folic acid:
- All WWE on AEDs planning pregnancy: 5 mg/day (high dose, not 0.4 mg)
- Start ≥ 3 months before conception
- Reduces (does not eliminate) NTD risk
- Rationale: AEDs (especially enzyme inducers and VPA) deplete folate
Contraception and AED Interactions (2 marks)
| Category | AEDs | Contraceptive Effect |
|---|---|---|
| Enzyme-inducing AEDs | Carbamazepine, phenytoin, phenobarbital, primidone, oxcarbazepine, topiramate (>200 mg/day), rufinamide | Reduce OCP efficacy, breakthrough pregnancy possible; need higher-dose OCP or IUD |
| Lamotrigine | OCP reduces lamotrigine levels by ~50% → seizure breakthrough when OCP started; lamotrigine dose increase needed | |
| Non-interacting AEDs | Valproate, levetiracetam, lacosamide, gabapentin, vigabatrin | No significant interaction |
| Safest contraceptive for WWE on enzyme inducers | IUD (copper or levonorgestrel) | Not affected by enzyme induction |
| Depot medroxyprogesterone (Depo-Provera) | Acceptable with enzyme inducers |
Clinical Implication: WWE on carbamazepine, phenytoin, or oxcarbazepine taking the OCP need to be counselled about reduced OCP efficacy. IUD is the most reliable option.
Pregnancy Management (3.5 marks)
Pre-conception:
- Review diagnosis, is epilepsy definitely present?
- Rationalise AED: Switch from valproate if at all possible; prefer monotherapy at lowest effective dose
- High-dose folate 5 mg/day
- Counsel re: risks of uncontrolled seizures (foetal hypoxia, placental abruption, maternal injury) AND AED teratogenicity
- Optimise seizure control before conception, accept some AED risk for good control
During Pregnancy:
- AED levels fall (increased Vd, renal clearance), especially lamotrigine and levetiracetam
- Monitor drug levels monthly (especially LTG); increase dose to maintain pre-pregnancy levels
- Serial anomaly scans: Detailed 20-week scan; fetal echocardiography if valproate/carbamazepine
- Neurology review each trimester
- Seizure risk in 3rd trimester: Sleep deprivation, non-compliance, level changes
Delivery:
- Vaginal delivery preferred; seizure risk during labour is low (~1–3%)
- IV lorazepam or diazepam available in delivery room
- Neonatal vitamin K at birth (enzyme-inducing AEDs reduce neonatal vitamin K → haemorrhage risk)
Breastfeeding:
- Encouraged in most cases
- Safe: Valproate, carbamazepine, oxcarbazepine (low breast milk levels)
- Monitor infant: Phenobarbital (sedation), lamotrigine (moderate levels), levetiracetam (moderate levels)
- Valproate: Low breast milk levels, generally safe
Catamenial Epilepsy (1 mark)
Seizures clustering with the menstrual cycle in ≥2x increase in specific phase vs. baseline. Three patterns: perimenstrual (C1), periovulatory (C2), anovulatory (C3). Mechanism: estrogen proconvulsant, progesterone anticonvulsant (GABA-A modulation), premenstrual progesterone withdrawal triggers seizures. Treatment: intermittent acetazolamide, progesterone supplementation, continuous OCP.
Answer 9: Discuss Non-Convulsive Status Epilepticus (NCSE). Why is it relevant to psychiatry?
Definition (1 mark)
Non-Convulsive Status Epilepticus (NCSE) refers to a state of prolonged (≥10 minutes) epileptic seizure activity without major motor manifestations, manifesting primarily as altered consciousness, cognitive dysfunction, or behavioural changes. Diagnosis requires EEG confirmation. NCSE encompasses absence status epilepticus, complex partial status epilepticus (focal status with impaired awareness), and subtle generalised convulsive SE.
Psychiatric Relevance (3 marks)
NCSE is the most important differential diagnosis in a patient presenting acutely with:
- Sudden-onset psychosis
- Acute confusional state (delirium-like)
- Fluctuating consciousness
- Mutism
- Bizarre behaviour with partial recall
- Apparent dissociative states
Clinical presentations that mimic psychiatric disorders:
Red Flags for NCSE in Psychiatric Settings:
- Known epilepsy history
- Recent change in AED
- Fluctuating rather than sustained symptoms
- Subtle motor features: lip smacking, eye blinking, facial twitching
- Amnesia for the episode
- Impaired command-following despite apparent wakefulness
Diagnosis (2 marks)
EEG is mandatory for diagnosis. NCSE cannot be reliably diagnosed clinically.
EEG Patterns in NCSE:
Salzburg Criteria (2015): Most widely used criteria for NCSE diagnosis on EEG, requires epileptiform activity >2.5 Hz OR epileptiform activity at any frequency with clinical/EEG improvement on IV benzodiazepine.
Diagnostic therapeutic trial:
IV lorazepam 0.1 mg/kg or IV diazepam 0.2 mg/kg, if clinical and EEG improvement occurs, this confirms NCSE.
Management (3 marks)
Immediate:
- Call neurology/intensive care
- Airway protection; oxygen
- IV access; glucose check
First-line (Benzodiazepines):
- IV lorazepam 0.1 mg/kg OR diazepam 0.2 mg/kg
- Buccal/intranasal midazolam if no IV access
Second-line (if persistent at 20–40 min):
- IV levetiracetam 60 mg/kg (preferred)
- IV valproate 40 mg/kg
- IV lacosamide (emerging)
NCSE-Specific Considerations vs. Convulsive SE:
- Less urgency than convulsive SE (no immediate airway compromise or rhabdomyolysis risk)
- But prolonged NCSE causes neuronal injury, treat within 30–60 minutes
- De-escalation of treatment can be more gradual
After resolution:
- Review and optimise AED regimen
- Identify precipitant: AED non-compliance, infection, sleep deprivation, metabolic disturbance
- Monitor for postictal psychiatric syndromes (psychosis, depression, anxiety)
Key Teaching Point (1 mark)
Every psychiatric inpatient unit should have access to EEG services. The rule of thumb: any acute-onset psychiatric syndrome with altered consciousness, fluctuating course, subtle motor features, or known epilepsy history, get an EEG before attributing to a primary psychiatric cause. Missing NCSE in a psychiatric setting constitutes a serious clinical error.
Answer 10: Discuss the management of epilepsy with comorbid bipolar disorder. What are the challenges?
Introduction (1 mark)
The co-occurrence of epilepsy and bipolar disorder presents a complex therapeutic challenge. Both conditions share neurobiological substrates (limbic-monoaminergic dysregulation, ion channel dysfunction), and several AEDs double as mood stabilisers. However, the interaction of AEDs with psychiatric medications, the risk of drug-induced mood changes, and the competing demands of seizure control versus mood stabilisation create genuine clinical complexity.
Prevalence of Comorbidity (0.5 marks)
- Bipolar disorder in epilepsy: ~5–10% (vs. ~2% in general population)
- Higher in TLE, limbic epilepsy
- Bidirectional risk: History of bipolar disorder increases epilepsy risk (shared neurodevelopmental vulnerability)
Shared AEDs: Dual-Use Agents (3 marks)
| AED / Mood Stabiliser | Epilepsy Evidence | Bipolar Evidence | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Valproate | Generalised epilepsy, focal (second-line), SE | BD-I mania (first-line), maintenance, rapid cycling | Best overlap; teratogenic |
| Carbamazepine | Focal epilepsy | BD (especially dysphoric mania, rapid cycling) | Strong enzyme inducer, affects many drugs |
| Lamotrigine | Focal + generalised (adjunct) | BD depression (best evidence) | NOT for acute mania; rash risk |
| Oxcarbazepine | Focal epilepsy | BD (limited evidence) | Fewer interactions than CBZ |
| Lithium | Not an AED | BD (first-line) | Lowers seizure threshold at toxic levels |
Strategic approach: When a patient has both epilepsy and bipolar disorder, prioritise AEDs with dual efficacy:
- BD-I + epilepsy: Valproate is optimal (covers seizures + mania)
- BD + epilepsy depression: Lamotrigine + valproate combination (covers both depression and seizures; but doubles LTG levels, titrate slowly, halve dose)
- Rapid cycling BD + epilepsy: Valproate ± lamotrigine
Specific Challenges (4 marks)
Challenge 1, AED-Induced Mood Episodes:
- Levetiracetam: Can cause irritability, depression, mania-like agitation, problematic in BD
- Topiramate: Depression and cognitive effects worsen BD depressive phases
- Vigabatrin: Can precipitate psychosis and mania
- Carbamazepine: Generally mood-stabilising, but rarely can activate
- Management: Monitor mood carefully when initiating AEDs; prefer valproate or lamotrigine in BD patients
Challenge 2, Drug Interactions:
- Carbamazepine reduces quetiapine levels by 60–70% → apparent antipsychotic failure
- Carbamazepine reduces lamotrigine levels → loss of mood stabilisation
- Valproate doubles lamotrigine levels → risk of Stevens-Johnson syndrome if titrated too quickly
- Enzyme-inducing AEDs reduce all psychotropic levels significantly
Challenge 3, Lithium + Epilepsy:
- Lithium is NOT an AED; lowers seizure threshold at toxic levels
- Lithium toxicity (levels >1.5 mM) can cause seizures, tremor, encephalopathy
- For BD patients with epilepsy: Prefer valproate over lithium if seizure threshold is a concern
Challenge 4, Clozapine in Refractory Cases:
- If treatment-resistant BD psychosis requires clozapine: Significant seizure risk (3–5% at high doses)
- EEG monitoring recommended before and during clozapine use
- Consider prophylactic AED (valproate) when clozapine dose escalates
- Do NOT combine clozapine + carbamazepine (dual agranulocytosis risk, absolute contraindication)
Challenge 5, Suicidality:
- Both epilepsy and BD independently elevate suicide risk
- Combined: Risk is substantially higher
- All AEDs carry FDA black box warning for suicidality
- Monitor closely; NDDI-E plus mood diary
Clinical Approach: Summary (1.5 marks)
- Establish each diagnosis independently, avoid assuming mood symptoms are entirely seizure-related
- Monotherapy preferred, minimise drug burden; prioritise dual-use agents (valproate, lamotrigine, carbamazepine)
- Interaction check mandatory before adding any new agent
- Mood monitoring at each visit, NDDI-E, mood diary
- Integrated care: Neuropsychiatrist or epilepsy psychiatry liaison is optimal; if unavailable, maintain clear communication between neurologist and psychiatrist
- Teratogenicity counselling in women, valproate concerns apply equally to BD and epilepsy
Answers 11–15: Additional Model Answers
Answer 11: Describe the EEG findings in epilepsy. What is the role of EEG in psychiatric practice?
EEG Fundamentals (1 mark)
Electroencephalography (EEG) records electrical activity of the cerebral cortex via scalp electrodes, measuring voltage fluctuations from ionic current flows in neurons. The International 10–20 system standardises electrode placement. A standard EEG records ~20–30 minutes; prolonged (24–72 hour) and video-EEG extend diagnostic yield.
Normal EEG Rhythms (1.5 marks)
| Rhythm | Hz | Location | Normal Context |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alpha | 8–13 | Occipital | Relaxed, eyes closed; attenuates with eye opening |
| Beta | 13–30 | Frontocentral | Alert, active thinking; augmented by benzodiazepines |
| Theta | 4–7 | Temporal, frontal | Drowsiness; normal in children; pathological if focal and awake |
| Delta | 0.5–3 | Diffuse | Deep sleep; pathological if present awake (focal = structural; diffuse = encephalopathy) |
| Mu | 8–13 | Central (Rolandic) | Motor cortex at rest |
Epileptiform Findings (2.5 marks)
| Pattern | Morphology | Clinical Significance |
|---|---|---|
| Spikes (<70ms) | Sharp, asymmetric | Focal IEDs, epileptogenic zone marker |
| Sharp waves (70–200ms) | Similar to spikes but slower | Focal or diffuse epilepsy |
| 3 Hz spike-wave | Regular, generalised | Childhood absence epilepsy (pathognomonic) |
| Slow spike-wave (<2.5 Hz) | Irregular, slow, diffuse | Lennox-Gastaut |
| Polyspike-wave | Multiple spikes + SW | JME, myoclonic epilepsies |
| Hypsarrhythmia | Chaotic, high amplitude, asynchronous | West syndrome (infantile spasms) |
| PLEDs | Unilateral, periodic | Acute focal injury (HSV encephalitis, stroke) |
| GPEDs | Bilateral, periodic | CJD (PSWCs), anoxic encephalopathy |
| Ictal pattern | Evolving frequency, amplitude, morphology | Active seizure |
Role of EEG in Psychiatry (4 marks)
1. Ruling out organic cause of psychiatric presentation:
- First-episode psychosis: EEG should be performed to exclude NCSE, encephalitis, structural/metabolic causes
- Acute confusional state: EEG distinguishes delirium (diffuse slowing), NCSE (epileptiform activity), functional (normal)
2. NCSE in acute psychiatric settings:
- Any fluctuating psychiatric syndrome with altered consciousness → urgent EEG
- Finding: Continuous or near-continuous epileptiform activity → confirms NCSE → emergency treatment
3. PNES evaluation:
- Gold standard: Video-EEG telemetry with captured event
- Normal EEG during typical event confirms PNES diagnosis
4. Monitoring drug effects:
- Clozapine: EEG before and after dose escalation; epileptiform activity = risk for clinical seizure
- Lithium toxicity: Diffuse slowing, triphasic waves
- Benzodiazepines: Increased beta activity (useful to confirm ingestion)
5. Delirium:
- Diffuse slowing is the hallmark EEG change in delirium, correlates with severity
- Monitoring treatment response in ICU delirium
6. ECT:
- Pre-ECT: Rule out structural lesions in selected patients
- Post-ECT: Postictal slowing; monitoring for adequate ictal duration
7. Dementia:
- Alzheimer's: Progressive slowing; alpha power reduction
- CJD: PSWCs 1–2 Hz (pathognomonic, present in ~70%)
- Frontotemporal: Less specific changes
Limitations (1 mark)
- Normal interictal EEG does NOT exclude epilepsy (30–50% of epilepsy patients have normal routine EEG)
- Epileptiform discharges in ~1–2% of normal adults (not diagnostic alone)
- Must interpret with clinical context always
- Prolonged/ambulatory EEG significantly improves sensitivity
Answer 12: Discuss the management of status epilepticus. What are the psychiatric implications?
Definition (0.5 marks)
Status epilepticus (SE) is a seizure lasting ≥5 minutes OR two or more seizures without full recovery of consciousness between them (ILAE 2015 operational definition for convulsive SE). The functional definition (T2, when neuronal injury begins) for convulsive SE is 30 minutes.
Classification (1 mark)
| Type | Definition | Psychiatric Relevance |
|---|---|---|
| Convulsive (GCSE) | Overt tonic-clonic activity | Post-SE psychiatric sequelae |
| Non-convulsive (NCSE) | Altered consciousness, EEG-confirmed | Presents as acute psychosis |
| Absence SE | Prolonged absence, subtle confusion | Misdiagnosed as psychiatric |
| Focal SE (impaired awareness) | Prolonged CPS | Prolonged psychotic-like states |
| Refractory SE | Not responding to first + second-line | ICU |
Management Protocol (4 marks)
Phase 1, 0–5 min (Stabilisation):
- ABCDE assessment
- High-flow oxygen, IV access
- Glucose: Check and correct if <3 mmol/L
- Blood: FBC, EUC, glucose, AED levels, toxicology, LFTs, Ca, Mg
- Thiamine 100 mg IV if alcoholism suspected (before glucose)
Phase 2, 5–20 min (First-line: Benzodiazepines):
| Drug | Route | Dose |
|---|---|---|
| Lorazepam | IV | 0.1 mg/kg (max 4 mg), can repeat ×1 |
| Diazepam | IV/PR | 0.2 mg/kg IV (max 10 mg); 10 mg PR |
| Midazolam | IM/buccal/IN | 10 mg IM (preferred if no IV) |
Phase 3, 20–40 min (Second-line: AED):
| Drug | Dose | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Levetiracetam | 60 mg/kg IV (max 4500 mg) | Preferred: few drug interactions, no cardiac monitoring |
| Valproate | 40 mg/kg IV (max 3000 mg) | Avoid: hepatic disease, pregnancy, mitochondrial disorders |
| Phenytoin/Fosphenytoin | 20 mg/kg IV | Cardiac monitoring required; slow infusion |
| Lacosamide | 200–400 mg IV | Emerging option |
Phase 4, 40+ min (Refractory SE: ICU):
- Anaesthetic agents: Midazolam infusion, propofol, thiopentone
- Continuous EEG monitoring (target: burst suppression)
- Ventilatory support
- Identify and treat underlying cause
Psychiatric Implications (3.5 marks)
1. NCSE as Psychiatric Emergency:
As discussed, acute psychosis, confusion, mutism as SE presentations. Every psychiatrist must know this differential. Emergency EEG in acutely confused patients with known epilepsy is mandatory.
2. Post-SE Psychiatric Sequelae:
After convulsive SE, the following can emerge:
- Postictal psychosis (24–48h later, lucid interval)
- Postictal depression
- Postictal aggression (in the immediate postictal period, not purposeful)
- Cognitive decline (especially after prolonged SE or recurrent SE)
3. AED Selection in Patients with Psychiatric Comorbidity:
- Prefer levetiracetam or lacosamide as second-line in patients with mood disorders (valproate is acceptable; phenytoin less so)
- Avoid phenobarbital maintenance post-SE in depression-prone patients
4. Neurological Injury → Psychiatric Sequelae:
Prolonged SE causes hippocampal neuronal loss → subsequent development of TLE → full psychiatric spectrum of TLE. This trajectory (SE → TLE → depression/psychosis) is well-described and justifies aggressive SE management.
5. Psychiatric Medications and SE:
Clozapine, chlorpromazine, TCAs, lithium toxicity, all can precipitate SE. When SE occurs in a psychiatric patient, review all medications for proconvulsant potential.
1 mark: Correctly note that the psychiatric team's role in SE is primarily: (a) recognition when presenting as psychiatric symptoms, (b) managing post-SE psychiatric sequelae, (c) ensuring ongoing AED optimisation in patients with psychiatric comorbidity.
Answer 13: Describe Lennox-Gastaut syndrome. What are its psychiatric implications?
Definition and Triad (1 mark)
Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS) is a severe, age-related epileptic encephalopathy defined by three features: (1) multiple seizure types, (2) characteristic EEG pattern, and (3) cognitive/developmental impairment. It is one of the most challenging epilepsy syndromes to manage, with near-universal drug resistance.
Epidemiology and Aetiology (1 mark)
- Onset: 1–7 years; peak 3–5 years
- Preceded by West syndrome in 30%
- Structural causes: Cortical dysplasia, hypoxic-ischaemic injury, tuberous sclerosis, metabolic disorders
- Cryptogenic: 30–35%
Clinical Features: The Triad (3 marks)
1. Multiple Seizure Types:
2. EEG Features:
- Interictal: Slow spike-and-wave complexes < 2.5 Hz (typically 1.5–2 Hz), defines LGS EEG
- Sleep EEG: Paroxysmal fast activity (>10 Hz, 10–25 Hz "recruiting rhythm") during NREM sleep, highly specific
- Background: Diffuse slowing
3. Cognitive/Developmental Impairment:
- Intellectual disability: Present in >80%
- Progressive deterioration in many
- Regression common after LGS onset
Psychiatric Implications (4 marks)
1. Intellectual Disability and Adaptive Functioning:
- Ranges from mild to profound ID
- Requires educational placement, occupational therapy, structured daily routines
- Psychiatric assessment must be adapted for level of cognitive functioning, standard questionnaires may not apply
2. Behavioural Problems:
- Prevalence: 50–80% of LGS patients exhibit significant behavioural problems
- Types: Aggression, self-injurious behaviour, hyperactivity, stereotypies, non-compliance
- Management: Behavioural analysis, environmental modification, judicious use of medication
- Medications for aggression in ID: Risperidone, aripiprazole (evidence in ID/autism)
3. Autism Spectrum Disorder:
- ASD features: 20–30% of LGS
- Overlapping with tuberous sclerosis (when TSC is the aetiology, ASD rate is higher, 40–50%)
- ASD evaluation: Developmental history, CARS or ADOS adapted for level of function
4. ADHD Features:
- Hyperactivity, impulsivity, attention difficulties common
- May reflect frontal lobe dysfunction secondary to seizure activity
- AED polypharmacy (especially benzodiazepines, topiramate) worsens cognitive and attentional symptoms
5. AED-Related Psychiatric Effects in LGS:
- Clobazam: Sedation, paradoxical disinhibition (especially in ID patients)
- Topiramate: Cognitive effects worsening baseline ID
- Valproate: Sedation; preferred due to mood stabilisation properties
- Rufinamide: Generally well tolerated psychiatrically
- Cannabidiol (CBD): Emerging evidence; psychiatric side effects, somnolence, decreased appetite
6. Parental/Family Psychiatric Impact:
- Caregivers of LGS patients: High rates of depression (up to 60%), anxiety, burnout
- Respite care access, caregiver support groups, psychiatric monitoring of parents, part of comprehensive management
7. Quality of Life:
- Severely impaired in both patients and families
- Drop attacks are the feature most associated with poor QoL (physical danger, social restriction)
- Helmet use is necessary but stigmatising
Answer 14: Discuss the psychiatric aspects of West syndrome and infantile spasms.
Definition (1 mark)
West syndrome is an age-related epileptic encephalopathy of infancy, characterised by a classic triad: (1) epileptic (infantile) spasms, (2) hypsarrhythmia on EEG, and (3) developmental regression or arrest. It is the most common epileptic encephalopathy in infancy and one of the most psychiatrically significant, given its strong association with autism spectrum disorder and intellectual disability.
Epidemiology (0.5 marks)
- Incidence: ~1/4000 live births
- Age of onset: 3–12 months; peak 4–6 months
- Male slightly predominant
Aetiology (1 mark)
Tuberous sclerosis (TSC) is the most common identifiable structural cause, always examine for TSC features (ash leaf macules, shagreen patches, adenoma sebaceum, cardiac rhabdomyoma).
Clinical Features (1.5 marks)
Infantile Spasms:
- Brief (1–2 seconds), symmetric contractions
- Flexion, extension, or mixed
- Occur in clusters, most prominent on waking
- Child may appear to startle or "scrunch up"
- Often preceded by a cry or giggle
Hypsarrhythmia (EEG):
- Chaotic, high-amplitude
- Asynchronous slow waves with multifocal spikes superimposed
- No organised background activity
- Pathognomonic for West syndrome
Developmental Regression:
- Loss of previously acquired milestones (smile, eye contact, reaching)
- Often noted by parents as "baby seems different"
- Regression is the most clinically alarming feature
Treatment (1 mark)
| Treatment | Evidence | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| ACTH | Highest | Most evidence overall; rapid response |
| Vigabatrin | High | FIRST-LINE IF TSC, superior response in TSC |
| High-dose prednisolone | High | Non-inferiority to ACTH in some trials |
| Pyridoxine | Trial for 3–5 days | For pyridoxine-dependent epilepsy |
| Ketogenic diet | Moderate | If AEDs fail |
Early treatment = better neurodevelopmental outcome. Every 1-week delay increases ASD risk.
Psychiatric Implications (4.5 marks)
1. Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD):
- Prevalence of ASD in West syndrome: 30–50% overall; up to 60% in TSC-associated cases
- ASD features may emerge after seizure onset, often as developmental regression
- Mechanism: Epileptiform activity in limbic and association cortices disrupts critical periods of social-communicative brain development
- Diagnosis: Developmental surveillance at all follow-up appointments; formal ASD evaluation at 18–24 months
- Management: ABA, speech therapy, occupational therapy, structured educational programme
2. Intellectual Disability:
- 70–80% of West syndrome survivors have ID (ranges from mild to profound)
- Extent of ID correlates with: Underlying aetiology (TSC = better than anoxic injury), EEG duration of hypsarrhythmia, age at seizure onset, treatment latency
- Cryptogenic West syndrome: Better cognitive outcome (~50% normal or near-normal)
3. ADHD Features:
- Inattention, hyperactivity, impulsivity common in survivors
- May reflect frontal lobe involvement or medication effects (ACTH, steroids in early life)
4. Behavioural Disturbance:
- Irritability, sleep disturbance, self-injurious behaviour, all more common in TSC-associated cases
- ASD + seizures = complex behavioural management challenge
5. Impact on Caregivers:
- West syndrome diagnosis triggers significant parental crisis
- Parents require: Clear, compassionate communication; prognostic counselling; early referral to developmental services
- Parental depression: ~50–60% in first year after diagnosis
- Family counselling, social work input, essential components of management
6. Tuberous Sclerosis Complex (TSC), Special Case:
TSC-associated West syndrome warrants mention as a separate entity:
- Earlier vigabatrin treatment (pre-symptomatic in some guidelines) reduces ASD risk
- Everolimus (mTOR inhibitor): Reduces tuber burden and some cognitive effects
- Psychiatric manifestations in TSC beyond ASD: Anxiety, OCD, ADHD, aggression
Answer 15: Discuss the ILAE-defined epilepsy syndromes relevant to psychiatry. Compare their psychiatric profiles.
Introduction (1 mark)
Epilepsy syndromes are defined constellations of seizure types, EEG patterns, age of onset, aetiology, and natural history. For psychiatric practice, five syndromes are particularly relevant: Childhood Absence Epilepsy (CAE), Juvenile Myoclonic Epilepsy (JME), West syndrome, Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome (LGS), and Temporal Lobe Epilepsy (TLE). Each carries a distinct psychiatric profile.
Syndrome Profiles (5 marks)
| Feature | CAE | JME | West Syndrome | LGS | TLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age of onset | 4–12 y | 12–18 y | 3–12 months | 1–7 y | Any |
| Seizure types | Typical absence | Myoclonic, GTC, absence | Infantile spasms | Tonic, atonic, atypical absence | Focal (aura, automatisms), bilateral |
| Pathognomonic EEG | 3 Hz SWD | 4–6 Hz polyspike-wave | Hypsarrhythmia | Slow SWD <2.5 Hz | Temporal spikes; ictal rhythmic theta |
| Intellectual disability | No | No | 70–80% | Core feature | Not typical (except with lesion) |
| ASD | No | No | 30–50% | 20–30% | Not primary |
| Depression | Mild (reactive) | 20–30% | (preverbal onset) | (ID complicates assessment) | 30–50%, most prominent |
| Psychosis | Rare | Rare | Not described | Uncommon | 5–10% (interictal); PIP |
| ADHD features | Common (misdiagnosis) | 30–40% | Common (survivors) | Common | 30–40% |
| Personality changes | None | Impulsivity, poor self-regulation | Aggression, behavioural problems | Geschwind syndrome (20–40%) | |
| Drug resistance | Rare | Common if untreated/lifestyle | Common | Near-universal (90%) | 30–40% |
| AED of choice | Ethosuximide, VPA | VPA, LEV, LTG | ACTH, vigabatrin | VPA, LTG, clobazam, CBD | CBZ, OXC, LTG, LEV |
| Prognosis | Good (60% remit) | Lifelong (but manageable) | Variable (50% poor) | Poor | Variable |
| Psychiatric management priority | Identify, stop misdiagnosis as ADHD | Lifestyle, sleep, substance avoidance; mood screen | ASD surveillance, caregiver support | Behavioural management, caregiver burden | Full psychiatric comorbidity management |
Key Differentiating Points (2 marks)
CAE vs. ADHD: CAE is the critical differential for inattentive ADHD in children. Brief, frequent staring spells with no postictal phase = CAE until proven otherwise. Hyperventilation test in clinic: Induces typical absences. EEG confirms. Ethosuximide resolves both seizures and "attention problems."
JME lifestyle significance: JME is one of the few epilepsies where lifestyle modification is as important as medication. Sleep deprivation, alcohol, photic stimulation (common in adolescent social contexts) trigger seizures. Psychiatric input for sleep hygiene, impulse control, and substance use counselling is directly therapeutic.
LGS behavioural burden: LGS generates the highest caregiver psychiatric burden of all syndromes. Psychiatric support for families is not optional, depression and burnout in caregivers directly affects patient safety and treatment adherence.
TLE psychiatric depth: No other epilepsy syndrome generates as diverse or as clinically significant psychiatric comorbidity as TLE. Every psychiatrist working in a hospital setting will encounter TLE patients with depression, psychosis, or PNES, often simultaneously.
Clinical Synthesis (2 marks)
Psychiatric approach by syndrome priority:
- TLE, Screen for depression (NDDI-E), psychosis, anxiety at every visit; joint neuropsychiatry input
- West/LGS, Prioritise developmental assessment, ASD screening, caregiver psychiatric support
- JME, Lifestyle counselling, mood monitoring, valproate teratogenicity counselling in women
- CAE, Misdiagnosis awareness; once treated, most psychiatric issues resolve with seizure control
Mnemonics & Memory Tricks
15+ mnemonics covering all high-yield topics in Epilepsy & Psychiatry
Each mnemonic includes the full decoded content immediately below it. Don't just memorise the acronym, rehearse the full expansion under exam conditions. These are retrieval cues, not replacements for understanding.
MNEMONIC 1: Geschwind Syndrome: "5 H's of TLE Personality"
H H H H H
| Letter | Feature | Clinical Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Hypergraphia | Compulsive, excessive writing | Most specific feature; detailed journals, letters, notes |
| Hyperreligiosity | Intense spiritual/religious preoccupation | Mystical experiences, conversion experiences |
| Hyposexuality | Decreased sexual interest | Note: hypO, not hyperSEXuality |
| Hurts to leave (Viscosity) | Circumstantial, "sticky" thinking | Difficulty ending conversations; tangential |
| Heightened affect | Everything feels profound, meaningful | Deepened emotional resonance |
Remember "5 H's" not "5 B's", the most common error is confusing hyposexuality with hypersexuality. It's hypo. Also note the syndrome is associated with TLE/MTLE, not generalised epilepsy.
MNEMONIC 2: Postictal Psychosis Key Features: "LUCID"
L U C I D
The lucid interval is the single most testable feature of postictal psychosis. Examiners will give you a vignette of a patient who "seems fine" after seizures then develops psychosis 24–48h later, LUCID interval = Postictal Psychosis.
MNEMONIC 3: SLPE vs Schizophrenia: "PAWNS"
Schizophrenia-Like Psychosis of Epilepsy has PAWNS (not schizophrenia's full deck)
"SLPE has the POSITIVE features of schizophrenia without the NEGATIVE ones, and preserves AFFECT and WARMTH." Write this sentence in your answer.
MNEMONIC 4: ILAE 2017: Focal Seizure Descriptors, "SAME ACE"
Motor descriptors: SAME ACE
Non-motor: Autonomic, Behaviour arrest, Cognitive, Emotional, Sensory
MNEMONIC 5: West Syndrome Triad: "HIRS"
H I R S (Hypsarrhythmia In Regressing Spasms)
West = infantile; Lennox-Gastaut = childhood. The EEG distinguishes: Hypsarrhythmia (West) vs. Slow spike-wave <2.5 Hz (LGS). Treatment: ACTH (or vigabatrin if TSC).
MNEMONIC 6: Lennox-Gastaut: "DATS"
LGS = D A T S
"Tonic + Atonic + Atypical absence + Slow SWD + ID = Lennox-Gastaut." If you see drop attacks in a child with ID, think LGS until proven otherwise.
MNEMONIC 7: NDDI-E Items: "EVERYTHING FEELS LIKE A GUILTY STRUGGLE"
Six items of NDDI-E (Neurological Disorders Depression Inventory for Epilepsy):
GDNFEP, "Guilty Dead Nothing Frustrated Everything Pleasure"
Cutoff: ≥15 out of 24 = probable MDD (6 items × max 4 = 24)
Why NDDI-E not PHQ-9? Because PHQ-9 has somatic items (fatigue, sleep, concentration) that overlap with AED side effects, produces false positives in epilepsy. NDDI-E avoids somatic items entirely.
MNEMONIC 8: AED Proconvulsant Risk for Antipsychotics: "A ROQC" (Low to High)
A → R → O → Q → C (Aripiprazole → Risperidone → Olanzapine → Quetiapine → Clozapine)
Memory: "A Royal Orchestra Quite Carefully", least to most risky
Aripiprazole = safest antipsychotic in epilepsy. Clozapine = most dangerous. If clozapine is essential in a patient with epilepsy, add valproate prophylactically and monitor EEG.
MNEMONIC 9: Antidepressants to AVOID in Epilepsy: "BBC" (Bad For Brain Convulsions)
B B C
| Letter | Drug | Risk |
|---|---|---|
| Bupropion | Most proconvulsant antidepressant | Contraindicated |
| Butriptyline / TCAs broadly | High seizure risk | Avoid |
| Clomipramine | Especially at high doses | Avoid |
Safe alternatives: SSRIs (sertraline, escitalopram), SNRIs, mirtazapine
Bupropion is THE answer to "which antidepressant is contraindicated in epilepsy?" It is dose-dependently proconvulsant.
MNEMONIC 10: Enzyme-Inducing AEDs: "CORP"
C O R P = AEDs that induce CYP3A4 (reduce psychotropic levels)
Clinical consequence: Reduce levels of all antipsychotics and many antidepressants by 40–70%. When adding CORP drugs, expect apparent drug failure, increase psychotropic dose.
"CORP drugs kill your psych drug levels." Clozapine + carbamazepine = contraindicated (not just pharmacokinetic, dual agranulocytosis risk).
MNEMONIC 11: Teratogenicity Hierarchy: "VERY BAD PILL, LAMOTRIGINE OK"
Teratogenicity: High → Low
| Risk Level | AED | Memory |
|---|---|---|
| HIGHEST | Valproate (~10%) | "Very Bad" |
| High | Phenobarbital (~5–7%) | Probably Bad |
| Moderate | Phenytoin, Topiramate (~3–9%) | |
| Lower | Carbamazepine (~2–3%) | "Cautious" |
| Lowest | Lamotrigine (~2%), Levetiracetam (~2–3%) | "Lamotrigine OK" |
Folic acid: 5 mg/day for all WWE on AEDs, start 3 months pre-conception
Valproate's teratogenicity is BOTH structural (NTDs, cardiac) AND neurodevelopmental (IQ −7–9 points, autism 6× risk). This dual burden makes it uniquely harmful. MHRA 2018 guidance: Valproate MUST NOT be prescribed to girls/women of childbearing potential without PREVENT programme enrollment.
MNEMONIC 12: Status Epilepticus Management: "BEAT IT"
B E A T I T (Time-based Protocol)
| Letter | Step | Timing |
|---|---|---|
| Benzodiazepines first | Lorazepam IV / Midazolam IM | 5–20 min |
| Establish IV access & bloods | FBC, EUC, glucose, AED levels | 0–5 min |
| Airway, oxygen | ABC | 0–5 min |
| Third-line anesthetics | Midazolam infusion, propofol, thiopentone | >40 min (ICU) |
| IV AED second-line | Levetiracetam, Valproate, Phenytoin | 20–40 min |
| Thiamine first if alcohol | 100 mg IV before glucose | 0–5 min |
The examiner wants to see: (1) time-based protocol, (2) first-line benzodiazepines named with doses, (3) second-line AEDs named with doses, (4) escalation to ICU for refractory SE. Write in a table.
MNEMONIC 13: JME Classic Triad + Triggers: "MAG + SAS"
Triad: MAG (Myoclonic + Absence + Grand mal)
Triggers: SAS (Sleep deprivation + Alcohol + Stress/Sunlight)
JME is lifelong in most patients. Valproate is most effective but teratogenic, dilemma in young women. Lifestyle management (sleep, alcohol) is as important as medication.
MNEMONIC 14: Catamenial Epilepsy Patterns: "C1 C2 C3 = Period, Ovulation, Whole Luteal"
Three Herzog Patterns:
| Pattern | Phase | Mechanism |
|---|---|---|
| C1, Perimenstrual | Days −3 to +3 (around period) | Progesterone withdrawal → estrogen dominance |
| C2, Periovulatory | Days 10–13 (ovulation) | Estrogen surge (proconvulsant) |
| C3, Anovulatory | Days 10–28 (entire second half) | Low progesterone throughout luteal phase |
Memory: "C1 = (C)ycle start, C2 = (C)entre, C3 = (C)lose (whole closing half)"
MNEMONIC 15: PNES vs. Epilepsy Differentiators: "CLOSE EYES CRY LONG"
Features suggesting PNES:
Gold standard = Video-EEG with captured event. No clinical feature alone is diagnostic. The most specific single feature? Normal EEG during a typical event = PNES (until proven otherwise).
MNEMONIC 16: Ictal Emotions by Structure: "FAJ" (Fear-Amygdala-Joy)
| Emotion | Structure | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Fear | Amygdala | Most common ictal emotion (60–70%) |
| Amygdala | Central structure | Right amygdala > left for fear |
| Joy/Ecstasy | Insula, temporal | Rare; reported in "ecstatic seizures" (Dostoevsky reportedly had these) |
Also: Anger (temporal-frontal), Sadness (temporal), Disgust (basal ganglia-insula)
Dostoevsky's epilepsy and his famous description of ecstatic auras are literary classics that appear in neuropsychiatry texts. Ictal joy/ecstasy = rare mesial temporal / insula focus. Ictal fear = amygdala. Fear is the most common ictal emotion, examiners love this fact.
MNEMONIC 17: AED Psychiatric Uses: "VaLCa" (Valproate, Lamotrigine, Carbamazepine)
VaLCa = The three AEDs with established psychiatric indications
| Drug | Psychiatric Indication | Memory |
|---|---|---|
| Valproate | BD-I mania (first-line), maintenance, rapid cycling | Va = Valiant mood stabiliser |
| Lamotrigine | Bipolar depression (best evidence), maintenance | L = Low mood → Lamotrigine |
| Carbamazepine | BD (dysphoric mania, rapid cycling) | Ca = "Calms" cycling |
The rest of the AEDs (levetiracetam, topiramate, gabapentin, phenobarbital) are NOT primary psychiatric treatments. Pregabalin = licensed for GAD in Europe only.
MNEMONIC 18: Forced Normalisation: "LANDOLT'S PARADOX"
Simple memory sentence:
"When seizures STOP, the EEG NORMALISES, but the patient goes PSYCHOTIC, Landolt's PARADOX (1953)"
MNEMONIC 19: Blumer's Interictal Dysphoric Disorder: "DEAF + PFIE"
Eight symptoms in two groups:
Depressive group (DEAF):
Labile/Irritable group (PFIE):
IDD does NOT map onto DSM depression, it combines features of dysthymia, cyclothymia, and anxiety. The dysphoric, intermittent quality with both depressive AND irritable/elevated periods is the distinguishing signature.
MNEMONIC 20: Normal EEG Rhythms: "All Brains Think Deeply"
A B T D (Alpha, Beta, Theta, Delta: fast to slow)
| Rhythm | Hz | State | Location |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alpha | 8–13 | Relaxed, eyes closed | Occipital |
| Beta | 13–30 | Alert, active | Frontocentral |
| Theta | 4–7 | Drowsy | Temporal/frontal |
| Delta | 0.5–3 | Deep sleep (or pathological awake) | Diffuse |
"All Brains Think Deeply", Alpha → Beta → Theta → Delta (decreasing frequency)
In practice, remember: Delirium = Diffuse Delta/Theta slowing on EEG. This is the single most important EEG finding to know for psychiatry ward work. Always: delirium → EEG shows diffuse slowing, not epileptiform activity (though NCSE must be excluded).
High-Yield Comparisons
10 high-yield comparison tables for exam revision
Comparison tables are the highest-density format for 5–10 mark questions. When asked to "compare and contrast," reproduce the key rows from memory. Each table here is built around features examiners test directly.
Table 1: Epileptic Seizures vs. PNES (Psychogenic Non-Epileptic Seizures)
The gold standard for diagnosis is Video-EEG with captured event, state this in every answer. No clinical feature alone is definitive.
| Feature | Epileptic Seizure | PNES (Functional Seizure) |
|---|---|---|
| Onset | Abrupt, stereotyped across events | Gradual, variable build-up |
| Duration | Usually < 3 minutes | Often prolonged (> 3–5 min) |
| Eye position | Open; may be deviated laterally | Closed; resistance to passive opening |
| Motor features | Rhythmic (GTC), stereotyped automatisms (TLE) | Asynchronous, thrashing, pelvic thrusting, opisthotonus |
| Side-to-side head movement | Rare | Common (LR ~8) |
| Ictal crying/weeping | Very rare (< 1%) | Common (20–30%) |
| Consciousness | Absent (GTC/CPS) | Variable; may be partially present |
| Postictal confusion | Prolonged (> 30 min in GTC) | Minimal to absent |
| Tongue bite | Lateral tongue bite (specific) | Tip of tongue only; rare |
| Incontinence | Common in GTC | Less common |
| Recall of event | Absent for GTC | Often partial recall present |
| Triggers | Sleep deprivation, alcohol, illness, medication lapse | Psychosocial stressors; emotional context |
| Audience effect | None | Events more likely with observers |
| Serum prolactin (20 min post) | Elevated (GTC, CPS), not absence | Not elevated |
| EEG during event | Ictal epileptiform discharge | Normal |
| Postictal EEG | Diffuse slowing | Normal |
| CK post-event | Elevated (GTC) | Variable, usually normal |
| MRI | May show structural lesion | Usually normal |
| Psychiatric comorbidity | 30–50% | 70–90% (depression, PTSD, BPD) |
| Trauma history | Not specific | 50–80% report trauma/abuse |
| Gold standard diagnosis | Video-EEG (ictal discharge confirmed) | Video-EEG (normal EEG during event) |
| Treatment | AEDs | Psychotherapy (CBT, trauma-focused), AED withdrawal |
| Dual diagnosis | N/A | 10–30% have comorbid epilepsy |
Table 2: Ictal vs. Postictal vs. Interictal Psychosis
The TIMING relative to seizures is what distinguishes these three. The lucid interval is unique to postictal psychosis. Interictal psychosis is independent of seizure timing.
| Feature | Ictal Psychosis | Postictal Psychosis | Interictal Psychosis (SLPE) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Timing | DURING the seizure | 24–48h AFTER seizure cluster (lucid interval) | Independent of seizures; chronic |
| EEG | Active ictal discharge | Often normalised (forced normalisation) | Interictal or normal |
| Prevalence in TLE | < 1% | 7–10% | 5–10% |
| Duration | Seconds to minutes | Days to weeks (usually < 2 weeks) | Months to years |
| Lucid interval | None | YES, 24–48h, pathognomonic | Not applicable |
| Trigger | Ongoing seizure | Cluster of bilateral/GTC seizures | None specific |
| Mood features | Variable | Often elevated, euphoric, religious | Predominantly paranoid |
| Hallucinations | Visual/olfactory/auditory (lobe-dependent) | Both auditory AND visual | Auditory predominant |
| Affect | Ictal fear most common | Often elevated, bright | PRESERVED (warm), key SLPE feature |
| Negative symptoms | Not applicable | Absent | Absent/mild, KEY distinction from SCZ |
| Self-limiting | Yes | Yes (most cases) | No, chronic without treatment |
| Treatment | Treat underlying SE | Short-term antipsychotic; AED optimisation | Long-term antipsychotic; AED continuation |
| Risk of chronicity | None | ~15% progress to interictal with repeated episodes | Chronic course |
| Family history of SCZ | Not elevated | Not elevated | Not elevated |
Table 3: TLE (Temporal Lobe Epilepsy) vs. FLE (Frontal Lobe Epilepsy)
FLE is the second most common focal epilepsy. It is frequently misdiagnosed as PNES due to its bizarre, hypermotor semiology. Know the distinguishing features.
| Feature | TLE (Temporal Lobe Epilepsy) | FLE (Frontal Lobe Epilepsy) |
|---|---|---|
| Frequency | Most common focal epilepsy (60%) | Second most common focal epilepsy |
| Duration | 1–3 minutes | Brief (< 1 minute) |
| Aura | Epigastric rising, fear, deja vu, olfactory/gustatory | May be absent; may have brief sensory or affective aura |
| Motor features | Oral automatisms (lip smacking), manual automatisms (fumbling) | Hypermotor, pedalling, thrashing, pelvic thrusting, violent movements |
| Awareness | Usually impaired during automatisms | Variable; can be preserved during complex motor activity |
| Postictal confusion | Prominent (> 30 min) | Minimal to absent |
| Nocturnal predominance | Not typical | YES, FLE seizures often occur from sleep |
| Cluster tendency | Occasional | Common |
| EEG | Temporal spikes, rhythmic theta ictal | Frontal spikes; ictal EEG may be normal (frontal activity hard to capture) |
| MRI | Hippocampal sclerosis (MTLE), cortical dysplasia | Cortical dysplasia (most common), cavernomas, tumours |
| Misdiagnosis as PNES | Less common | VERY COMMON, hypermotor FLE mimics PNES |
| Psychiatric comorbidity | Full spectrum: depression, psychosis, personality changes, PNES overlap | Less psychiatric comorbidity data; ADHD features, impulse dyscontrol |
| Surgical outcome | ~70% seizure-free (MTLE with HS) | 50–60% (depends on lesion) |
| Psychiatric post-surgery | De novo depression/psychosis possible | Less data |
Table 4: Interictal Dysphoric Disorder (IDD) vs. Major Depressive Disorder in Epilepsy
IDD (Blumer's concept) does NOT map onto DSM-5 MDD. The key distinguishing feature is its intermittent, mixed dysphoric quality, low mood plus irritability plus episodic euphoria. Examiners test whether you know this distinction.
| Feature | Interictal Dysphoric Disorder (IDD) | Major Depressive Disorder in Epilepsy |
|---|---|---|
| Concept | Blumer (2004), epilepsy-specific mood disorder | Standard DSM-5 MDD occurring in epilepsy context |
| Course | Intermittent, fluctuating, paroxysmal | Sustained depressive episodes (≥ 2 weeks) |
| Mood quality | Dysphoric, mixed: low mood + irritability + brief euphoria | Predominantly low mood; anhedonia |
| Irritability | Prominent, persistent | May be present but not defining |
| Euphoric periods | YES, brief periods of elevated mood | Absent (absent in MDD; present = consider BD) |
| Anhedonia | Mild | Often severe |
| Somatic symptoms | Anergia, pain, insomnia (4 of 8 symptoms) | Sleep, appetite, energy changes |
| DSM-5 mapping | Poor fit, doesn't map cleanly | Maps to MDD criteria |
| Temporal relation to seizures | Interictal, but related to seizure disorder | Not specifically tied to seizure timing |
| Screening tool | NDDI-E appropriate | NDDI-E; PHQ-9 less ideal |
| Treatment | SSRI + low-dose lamotrigine (anecdotal); treat underlying seizures | SSRIs first-line; CBT; AED optimisation |
| Clinical significance | Reduces QoL; often under-recognised | Well-established clinical entity |
Table 5: AED Psychiatric Profiles: Benefit vs. Risk
This is the master AED-psychiatry table. Know the "positive psychiatric use" column AND the "negative psychiatric effects" column. Examiners will ask about both directions.
| AED | Mechanism | Positive Psychiatric Use | Negative Psychiatric Effects | Key Interaction |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Valproate | GABA ↑, Na channel | BD-I mania (first-line), maintenance, rapid cycling, aggression in ID | Sedation, weight gain, cognitive dulling, teratogenicity | Doubles lamotrigine levels |
| Carbamazepine | Na channel | BD (dysphoric mania, rapid cycling) | Sedation, hyponatraemia (SIADH), cognitive effects | Strong CYP3A4 inducer; reduces all antipsychotics |
| Lamotrigine | Na/Ca channel, ↓glutamate | Bipolar depression (best evidence), mood cycling prevention | Insomnia, activation, rash (SJS risk); rarely psychosis | OCP halves lamotrigine levels |
| Levetiracetam | SV2A binding | Minimal sedation; no cognitive impairment | Irritability, aggression, depression, psychosis (10%) | Minimal interactions |
| Topiramate | Multiple | Weight loss (sometimes desired) | Cognitive ("Dopamax", word-finding), depression, suicidality | Enzyme inducing at high doses (reduces OCP) |
| Phenobarbital | GABA-A ↑ | Sedation (occasionally useful) | Depression (worst AED for depression), cognitive impairment, dependence | Strong CYP inducer |
| Vigabatrin | GABA transaminase inhibitor | Infantile spasms (especially TSC) | Depression, psychosis, forced normalisation, visual field defects | Reduces phenytoin levels |
| Oxcarbazepine | Na channel | BD (limited evidence) | Hyponatraemia, dizziness | Less enzyme induction than CBZ |
| Pregabalin | α2-δ subunit | GAD (licensed in Europe), neuropathic pain | Sedation, weight gain, misuse/dependence potential | Minimal |
| Perampanel | AMPA antagonist | Good efficacy; low cognitive burden | Aggression, hostility, irritability (dose-dependent) | Moderate inducer at high doses |
| Lacosamide | Slow inactivation Na channel | Low psychiatric burden; useful adjunct | Minimal; dizziness, diplopia | Minimal |
| Clonazepam | GABA-A ↑ | Panic disorder, acute mania adjunct, antimyoclonic | Dependence, sedation, cognitive impairment, paradoxical disinhibition | Additive CNS depression |
| Zonisamide | Multiple | Weight loss | Cognitive effects, depression, kidney stones | Moderate inducer |
Table 6: Postictal Psychosis vs. Forced Normalisation vs. Interictal Psychosis
These three are frequently confused. The distinguishing axis is: timing relative to seizures + EEG finding + whether seizures are present or absent when psychosis occurs.
| Feature | Postictal Psychosis | Forced Normalisation | Interictal Psychosis |
|---|---|---|---|
| Seizures at time of psychosis | Just had a cluster | Just STOPPED (controlled) | Present or absent; unrelated |
| EEG | Often normalised | Normalised, defining feature | May show interictal discharges or be normal |
| Concept origin | Clinical description | Landolt (1953), EEG phenomenon | Slater & Beard (1963) |
| Timing | 24–48h after seizure cluster | After seizure control achieved | Chronic, independent of seizures |
| Lucid interval | YES, pathognomonic | Not a feature | Not applicable |
| AED context | No recent AED change typically | Often precipitated by new/increased AED | No specific AED context |
| Resolution | Seizures return (or antipsychotic treatment) | AED reduced / seizures allowed to recur OR antipsychotic | Chronic; requires long-term antipsychotic |
| Mood | Often elevated, religious | Often elevated, grandiose | Predominantly paranoid delusions |
| Duration | Days–weeks | Days–weeks | Months–years |
| Mechanism | Rebound dopaminergic hyperactivity post-seizure | Seizures suppress psychosis; removal of seizures allows psychosis | Kindling + limbic structural change |
Table 7: Childhood Absence Epilepsy vs. Juvenile Myoclonic Epilepsy
CAE and JME are both "idiopathic generalised epilepsies" but differ critically in age, prognosis, and drug choice. JME is lifelong; CAE often remits. Valproate covers both but is teratogenic, critical for JME patients who are typically young women.
| Feature | Childhood Absence Epilepsy (CAE) | Juvenile Myoclonic Epilepsy (JME) |
|---|---|---|
| Age of onset | 4–12 years | 12–18 years (adolescence) |
| Seizure types | Typical absence (multiple daily, 50–100/day) | Myoclonic + GTC + absence (30%) |
| Myoclonic seizures | Absent | Hallmark, worse on morning waking |
| GTC seizures | Rare | Common; triggered by sleep deprivation |
| Timing | Any time; provoked by hyperventilation | Morning; sleep deprivation is key trigger |
| EEG | 3 Hz generalised spike-wave (pathognomonic) | 4–6 Hz polyspike-wave, frontally dominant |
| Photosensitivity | Rare | 30–50% |
| Prognosis | 60–70% remit at puberty | Lifelong in most (> 80% relapse if AED stopped) |
| Intelligence | Normal | Normal |
| Psychiatric comorbidity | Mild (ADHD-like attention issues) | ADHD (30–40%), anxiety, depression, impulsivity |
| AED of choice | Ethosuximide (first-line pure absence), VPA | VPA (most effective), LEV, LTG |
| AED, avoid | Carbamazepine, phenytoin (worsen absences) | Carbamazepine, phenytoin (worsen myoclonus) |
| Lifestyle advice | Minimal | Critical, sleep hygiene, alcohol avoidance, stress management |
| Teratogenicity concern | Less (younger, pre-reproductive) | HIGH, teenage girls on VPA need PREVENT counselling |
| Misdiagnosis risk | Misdiagnosed as ADHD/daydreaming | Misdiagnosed as "morning clumsiness," alcohol-related |
Table 8: West Syndrome vs. Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome
West precedes LGS in 30% of cases. Together they represent the "epileptic encephalopathy continuum." Both cause intellectual disability, but their EEG patterns and seizure types are distinct.
| Feature | West Syndrome | Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome (LGS) |
|---|---|---|
| Age of onset | 3–12 months (peak 4–6 months) | 1–7 years (peak 3–5 years) |
| Relationship | May precede LGS (30% of LGS cases) | May follow West syndrome |
| Seizure types | Infantile spasms (flexion, extension, mixed) | Tonic (hallmark), atonic (drop attacks), atypical absence, GTC, myoclonic |
| Most characteristic seizure | Infantile spasms in clusters on waking | Nocturnal tonic seizures |
| EEG, interictal | Hypsarrhythmia, chaotic, high-amplitude, asynchronous | Slow spike-wave < 2.5 Hz (usually 1.5–2 Hz) |
| EEG, sleep | Modified hypsarrhythmia | Paroxysmal fast activity (> 10 Hz), specific for LGS |
| Intellectual disability | 70–80%; variable by aetiology | Core feature; progressive in many |
| ASD | 30–50% (highest in TSC) | 20–30% |
| Drug resistance | Common | Near-universal (90%) |
| First-line treatment | ACTH, vigabatrin (TSC → vigabatrin first) | Valproate, lamotrigine, clobazam, rufinamide, CBD |
| Drop attacks | Not typical | Major feature, helmet required |
| Safety concern | Developmental window, urgency of treatment | Drop attack injuries; nocturnal tonic seizures |
| Prognosis | Variable; cryptogenic better | Poor; drug resistance the rule |
| Psychiatric management | ASD surveillance; caregiver support | Behavioural management; caregiver burden; ID-adapted psychiatric care |
Table 9: Schizophrenia vs. Schizophrenia-Like Psychosis of Epilepsy (SLPE)
Slater & Beard (1963) is the reference study. The "positive without negative" pattern and preserved affect are the two most tested distinguishing features. Write them clearly in your answer.
| Feature | Schizophrenia | SLPE (Interictal Psychosis of Epilepsy) |
|---|---|---|
| Positive symptoms | Prominent | Prominent, SAME |
| Negative symptoms | Often prominent; progressive | MILD OR ABSENT, KEY DISTINCTION |
| Affect | Often blunted/flat | PRESERVED, WARM, KEY DISTINCTION |
| Social deterioration | Severe | Milder |
| Formal thought disorder | Common, often prominent | Less severe |
| First rank symptoms (Schneider) | Characteristic | May be present |
| Family history of psychosis | Elevated | NOT elevated |
| Premorbid function | Often impaired | Often normal |
| Age of onset | Early adulthood (teens–20s) | After 10–15 years of epilepsy (mean ~30s) |
| Neurodevelopmental basis | Strong | Less primary; secondary to epilepsy |
| Underlying pathology | Diffuse grey matter changes; dopamine dysregulation | Hippocampal sclerosis; limbic pathology; kindling |
| Response to antipsychotics | Yes | Yes |
| AED role | Not applicable | Continue AEDs; they do NOT worsen psychosis |
| Religious/grandiose content | Present but not specific | Often prominent |
| Catatonia | Possible | Rare |
| Clozapine use | For treatment-resistant cases | Avoid if possible (seizure risk); use only if truly treatment-resistant |
| Cognitive profile | Progressive cognitive decline | Epilepsy-related cognitive effects; less than schizophrenia's decline |
| Long-term prognosis | Chronic deteriorating course | Less deterioration; some stability with treatment |
Table 10: Valproate vs. Lamotrigine: Psychiatric and Reproductive Comparison
This comparison appears repeatedly in Indian PG exams because of the teratogenicity dilemma in young women with epilepsy and/or bipolar disorder. Know it cold.
| Feature | Valproate (Sodium Valproate) | Lamotrigine |
|---|---|---|
| Epilepsy indication | Generalised epilepsy (JME, CAE, LGS), focal (second-line), SE | Focal epilepsy (adjunct/monotherapy), generalised (adjunct) |
| Psychiatric indication | BD-I mania (first-line), maintenance, rapid cycling | Bipolar depression (best evidence), NOT acute mania |
| Mechanism | GABA ↑, Na channel, histone deacetylase inhibition | Na/Ca channel blockade, ↓ glutamate release |
| Teratogenicity | HIGHEST, ~10% MCM; NTDs 1–2%; IQ −7–9pts; autism 6× | Lowest, ~2% MCM; slight orofacial cleft increase |
| MHRA guidance | PREVENT programme mandatory in women of childbearing potential | Preferred in women of reproductive age |
| OCP interaction | None (VPA does not affect OCP) | OCP reduces LTG levels by ~50%, seizure risk |
| Lamotrigine interaction | VPA doubles LTG levels, rash risk | N/A |
| Rash risk | Low | 10% mild; 0.1–0.3% Stevens-Johnson (higher with fast titration + VPA) |
| Weight | Weight GAIN | Weight NEUTRAL |
| Cognitive effects | Mild sedation; cognitive dulling at high doses | MINIMAL, cognitive profile is favourable |
| Mood in bipolar, acute mania | Effective (first-line) | NOT effective for acute mania |
| Mood in bipolar, depression | Moderate evidence | Best evidence for bipolar depression |
| Pregnancy levels | Relatively stable | FALL significantly, increase dose with monitoring in pregnancy |
| Breastfeeding | Low milk levels, generally safe | Moderate milk levels, monitor infant |
| Drug interactions | Inhibits CYP2C9/UGT, increases LTG, phenobarbital | Affected by enzyme inducers (CBZ, PHT → halve levels) and VPA (double levels) |
| Monitoring | LFTs, FBC, drug levels, weight | Drug levels (especially in pregnancy); rash watch |
| Suicide risk | FDA black box (class warning) | FDA black box (class warning) |
| Bottom line for young woman with epilepsy | Avoid if possible, if essential: PREVENT, folic acid 5mg, minimum dose | Preferred, lowest teratogenicity; adjust for OCP interaction |
PYQ Frequency Analysis
Analysis based on PG exams MD Psychiatry Paper IV question patterns, PG theory papers, and PG exams PG entrance patterns. Covers 17+ years of available data.
This chapter identifies WHERE to spend your time. High-frequency topics in bold. If a topic has appeared 3+ times, it is near-certain to appear again. Focus 70% of revision time on Tier 1 and Tier 2 topics.
SECTION 1: Master Frequency Table
| Topic | Estimated Frequency | Tier | Question Type | Marks |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Postictal psychosis | ★★★★★ Very High | 1 | Long answer, short note | 10, 5 |
| PNES / Pseudoseizures | ★★★★★ Very High | 1 | Long answer, differentiation | 10, 5 |
| AEDs as mood stabilisers (VPA, CBZ, LTG) | ★★★★★ Very High | 1 | Long answer, short note | 10, 5 |
| Psychiatric effects of AEDs | ★★★★★ Very High | 1 | Long answer, table | 10, 5 |
| Depression in epilepsy | ★★★★☆ High | 1 | Short note, long answer | 5, 10 |
| Schizophrenia-like psychosis of epilepsy | ★★★★☆ High | 1 | Long answer, short note | 10, 5 |
| Seizure classification (ILAE) | ★★★★☆ High | 1 | Short note, part of long answer | 5 |
| Forced normalisation / Landolt | ★★★★☆ High | 1 | Short note | 5 |
| Temporal lobe epilepsy & psychiatry | ★★★★☆ High | 1 | Long answer | 10 |
| Geschwind syndrome | ★★★☆☆ Moderate | 2 | Short note | 5 |
| NDDI-E | ★★★☆☆ Moderate | 2 | Short note, MCQ | 5 |
| EEG in psychiatry | ★★★☆☆ Moderate | 2 | Short note | 5 |
| West syndrome | ★★★☆☆ Moderate | 2 | Short note | 5 |
| Lennox-Gastaut syndrome | ★★★☆☆ Moderate | 2 | Short note | 5 |
| JME | ★★★☆☆ Moderate | 2 | Short note | 5 |
| Women with epilepsy / teratogenicity | ★★★☆☆ Moderate | 2 | Short note, long answer | 5, 10 |
| Status epilepticus management | ★★★☆☆ Moderate | 2 | Short note, protocol | 5 |
| Interictal dysphoric disorder | ★★☆☆☆ Lower | 3 | Short note | 5 |
| Catamenial epilepsy | ★★☆☆☆ Lower | 3 | Short note | 5 |
| Epilepsy surgery & psychiatric outcomes | ★★☆☆☆ Lower | 3 | Short note | 5 |
| Ictal fear | ★★☆☆☆ Lower | 3 | Part of larger answer | |
| Driving and epilepsy | ★★☆☆☆ Lower | 3 | Short note | 5 |
| Anti-NMDAR encephalitis | ★★☆☆☆ Lower | 3 | Short note | 5 |
| Childhood absence epilepsy | ★★☆☆☆ Lower | 3 | Short note | 5 |
SECTION 2: Tier 1 Topics: Highest Priority
Topic 1: Postictal Psychosis
Estimated appearances: 4–6 times in 17 years
Why it's Tier 1: Combines clinical psychiatry (psychosis management), neuropsychiatry (peri-ictal phenomena), and pharmacology (antipsychotics in epilepsy). Examiners love it because it tests integration.
How it's been asked:
- "Describe postictal psychosis. Discuss its management." (10 marks)
- "Write a short note on postictal psychosis." (5 marks)
- "What is the lucid interval? Discuss its clinical significance." (5 marks)
- Part of: "Classify psychiatric phenomena in epilepsy."
What the marking key expects:
- Definition with lucid interval prominently stated
- Epidemiology (7–10% TLE)
- Clinical features table (mood, hallucinations, EEG, duration)
- Risk factors (bilateral foci, prior PIP)
- Pathophysiology (forced normalisation/dopamine)
- Management (antipsychotic choice, aripiprazole/olanzapine, avoid clozapine; AED optimisation; psychoeducation)
- Prognosis (15% risk of chronic interictal psychosis with recurrence)
The examiner wants to see "lucid interval 24–48 hours" in the FIRST paragraph. If you don't mention it early, marks bleed.
Topic 2: PNES / Psychogenic Non-Epileptic Seizures
Estimated appearances: 4–6 times in 17 years
Why it's Tier 1: Tests clinical differentiation skill, psychiatric formulation, and management of a medically complex patient. Also tests awareness of FND framework.
How it's been asked:
- "Compare epileptic seizures with pseudoseizures." (10 marks)
- "Discuss the management of PNES." (10 marks)
- "What is the gold standard for diagnosing PNES? Discuss clinical features." (5–10 marks)
- "Write a short note on psychogenic non-epileptic seizures." (5 marks)
What the marking key expects:
- Definition and preferred terminology (PNES, functional seizures, not pseudoseizures)
- Epidemiology (20–30% of EMU referrals; 7-year diagnostic delay)
- Clinical differentiation table (semiology, EEG, postictal, eye position)
- Gold standard = Video-EEG with captured event
- Psychiatric comorbidity profile (depression, PTSD, BPD)
- Disclosure framework (what to say, what NOT to say)
- Management (CBT first-line; treat comorbidities; AED withdrawal)
- Prognosis
Always state gold standard early. Always mention 10–30% dual diagnosis (comorbid epilepsy). Always use the term PNES, not pseudoseizures. These are easy marks that candidates routinely miss.
Topic 3: AEDs as Mood Stabilisers
Estimated appearances: 4–5 times in 17 years
Why it's Tier 1: Bridges neurology and psychiatry pharmacology. Extremely practical. Also connects to teratogenicity and drug interactions.
How it's been asked:
- "Discuss the role of anticonvulsants in psychiatry." (10 marks)
- "Write about valproate as a mood stabiliser." (5–10 marks)
- "Compare valproate and lamotrigine in bipolar disorder." (10 marks)
- "Discuss carbamazepine in psychiatry." (5 marks)
Key content points:
- Valproate: BD-I mania first-line; mechanism; teratogenicity; PREVENT
- Carbamazepine: BD (especially rapid cycling, dysphoric); enzyme induction
- Lamotrigine: Bipolar depression (best evidence); rash; OCP interaction
- The three together: VaLCa (Valproate + Lamotrigine + Carbamazepine)
Topic 4: Psychiatric Side Effects of AEDs
Estimated appearances: 4–5 times in 17 years
Why it's Tier 1: Pure pharmacology with direct clinical application. Every resident will encounter this.
How it's been asked:
- "Discuss the psychiatric side effects of antiepileptic drugs." (10 marks)
- "Write a note on levetiracetam and its psychiatric effects." (5 marks)
- "What are the cognitive effects of topiramate?" (5 marks)
- "Discuss phenobarbital and depression." (5 marks)
The examiner's three key drugs:
- Levetiracetam, irritability/aggression/psychosis (10%)
- Topiramate, cognitive impairment ("Dopamax"), word-finding
- Phenobarbital, depression (worst AED for depression)
Plus: Valproate teratogenicity, vigabatrin forced normalisation, FDA black box for all AEDs.
Topic 5: Depression in Epilepsy
Estimated appearances: 3–4 times in 17 years
How it's been asked:
- "Discuss depression in epilepsy." (10 marks)
- "Write a note on NDDI-E." (5 marks)
- "What is the bidirectional relationship between epilepsy and depression?" (5 marks)
Key content requirements:
- Bidirectional relationship (both increase risk of the other, shared neurobiology)
- Prevalence 30–50% in TLE
- NDDI-E (6 items, cutoff ≥15, preferred over PHQ-9 in epilepsy)
- Antidepressants in epilepsy: SSRIs safe; bupropion contraindicated; TCAs avoid
- Suicide risk (5× higher)
- FDA 2008 AED suicidality warning
Topic 6: SLPE / Interictal Psychosis
Estimated appearances: 3–4 times in 17 years
How it's been asked:
- "Describe schizophrenia-like psychosis of epilepsy." (10 marks)
- "How does interictal psychosis differ from schizophrenia?" (10 marks)
- "Write a note on Slater and Beard (1963)." (5 marks)
Non-negotiable content:
- Slater & Beard 1963, cite this
- "Positive without negative" pattern
- Preserved affect (warmth), most distinctive
- No family history of schizophrenia
- Appears 10–15 years after epilepsy onset
SECTION 3: Tier 2 Topics: Important, Appear Regularly
Topic 7: Forced Normalisation / Landolt
How asked: "Write a short note on forced normalisation." (5 marks)
Must include: Landolt 1953; EEG normalisation when seizures stop; alternative psychosis (Tellenbach); AEDs implicated (vigabatrin, ethosuximide); management (reduce AED + antipsychotic); clinical implication (do NOT increase AED).
Topic 8: ILAE Seizure Classification
How asked: "Classify seizures according to ILAE 2017." (5 marks, or as part of a 10-mark TLE question)
Must include: Three levels (seizure type, epilepsy type, syndrome); focal (aware/impaired/bilateral), generalised (motor/non-motor), unknown; replace old terms with new.
Topic 9: Temporal Lobe Epilepsy and Psychiatry
How asked: "Discuss the psychiatric relevance of temporal lobe epilepsy." (10 marks)
Must include: MTLE features; aura types; psychiatric comorbidities (depression 30–50%, anxiety 25–40%, psychosis 5–10%); Geschwind syndrome; ictal fear; peri-ictal psychoses; PNES overlap.
Topic 10: Women with Epilepsy / Teratogenicity
How asked: "Discuss management of epilepsy in pregnancy." / "Write about teratogenicity of AEDs." (10 marks, 5 marks)
Must include: Valproate hierarchy; lamotrigine preferred; folic acid 5 mg; OCP interactions; pregnancy AED level monitoring; fetal anomaly scans; breastfeeding guidance.
Topic 11: EEG in Psychiatry
How asked: "Discuss the role of EEG in psychiatric practice." (5–10 marks)
Must include: Normal rhythms (table); epileptiform patterns; delirium (diffuse slowing); NCSE; PNES (video-EEG); clozapine monitoring; CJD (PSWCs); drug effects (benzodiazepine → beta).
Topic 12: Status Epilepticus
How asked: "Outline the management of status epilepticus." (5–10 marks)
Must include: ILAE 2015 definition (≥5 min); time-based protocol; benzodiazepines first (doses); second-line (LEV, VPA, phenytoin); refractory (ICU, anaesthetic); psychiatric relevance (NCSE).
Topic 13: West Syndrome and LGS
How asked: Usually "short note" (5 marks each)
West, must include: Triad (spasms + hypsarrhythmia + regression); age (3–12 months); ACTH/vigabatrin; ASD and ID outcomes.
LGS, must include: Triad (multiple seizure types + slow SWD <2.5 Hz + ID); tonic seizures hallmark; drop attacks; drug resistance; psychiatric burden.
SECTION 4: Tier 3 Topics: Lower Frequency, Include if Time Permits
SECTION 5: Question Pattern Analysis by Year-Type
Common Long Answer (10-mark) Patterns
Common Short Note (5-mark) Patterns
SECTION 6: High-Yield Facts That Appear as MCQs or One-Liners
SECTION 7: Predicted High-Probability Questions for 2026 Exit Exam
These are probabilistic, not guaranteed. Based on recency, clinical relevance, and gap analysis (topics not asked in recent years are due).
| Priority | Predicted Question | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | "Discuss postictal psychosis, features, pathophysiology, and management." (10 marks) | Perennial favourite; covers peri-ictal phenomena cleanly |
| 2 | "Compare epileptic seizures with PNES. Discuss management of PNES." (10 marks) | Due again; integrates neuropsychiatry + FND |
| 3 | "Discuss psychiatric side effects of antiepileptic drugs with special reference to levetiracetam and topiramate." (10 marks) | Newer AEDs increasingly prescribed; examiners track this |
| 4 | "Discuss Women with Epilepsy, teratogenicity, contraception, and pregnancy management." (10 marks) | MHRA 2018 valproate guidance makes this highly topical |
| 5 | "Write a note on forced normalisation. Describe its clinical implications." (5 marks) | Eponymous, elegant, consistently appears |
| 6 | "Discuss depression in epilepsy, prevalence, screening, and treatment." (10 marks) | Bidirectional relationship is a strong conceptual question |
| 7 | "Describe the schizophrenia-like psychosis of epilepsy. How does it differ from schizophrenia?" (10 marks) | Classic Slater & Beard, never goes out of style |
| 8 | "Write a short note on the NDDI-E." (5 marks) | Screening tools increasingly asked; specific to epilepsy |
| 9 | "Discuss the role of EEG in psychiatric practice." (10 marks) | Cross-cutting topic; tests neuropsychiatric integration |
| 10 | "Discuss Lennox-Gastaut syndrome with its psychiatric implications." (5–10 marks) | Epileptic encephalopathies underasked recently |
SECTION 8: Topics to COMBINE in Answers
Some topics appear individually but are better answered together, mentioning them in a related answer earns extra marks.
Revision note: Cross-reference with D2-ModelAnswers.md for fully written-out versions of the top predicted questions.
Quick Review
30 rapid-fire question-answer pairs covering all high-yield Epilepsy & Psychiatry topics
Use this file for active recall, cover the answer column, read the question, attempt the answer from memory, then reveal. Do this 48h before the exam. Each answer is deliberately concise, expand in writing practice using D2-ModelAnswers.md.
RAPID-FIRE Q&A: ALL 30 PAIRS
Q1
What is the pathognomonic feature that distinguishes postictal psychosis from other peri-ictal psychoses?
A: The lucid interval, a clear period of 24–48 hours between the seizure cluster and onset of psychosis. The patient appears recovered, then develops acute psychosis. This feature is unique to postictal psychosis and is the single most testable fact about this condition.
Q2
Slater and Beard (1963) described schizophrenia-like psychosis of epilepsy. What are the TWO most important features that distinguish it from schizophrenia?
A: 1. Negative symptoms are absent or mild (schizophrenia typically has prominent negative symptoms) 2. Affect is preserved and warm (schizophrenia typically shows blunted/flat affect) Additional distinguishing features: No elevated family history of schizophrenia; premorbid function often normal; onset 10–15 years after epilepsy onset.
Q3
What is forced normalisation? Who described it and when?
A: Forced normalisation (Heinrich Landolt, 1953) is the paradoxical normalisation of EEG coinciding with the emergence of psychiatric symptoms (most commonly psychosis) when epileptic seizure activity is suppressed, either spontaneously or pharmacologically. The EEG, previously showing epileptiform activity, becomes normal while psychosis emerges. Tellenbach (1965) described the clinical counterpart as "alternative psychosis."
Q4
Which AED carries the highest risk of inducing forced normalisation?
A: Vigabatrin (highest risk), followed by ethosuximide, then lamotrigine. Mechanism: excessive GABAergic enhancement may disrupt limbic networks regulating psychotic threshold.
Q5
What is the gold standard for diagnosing PNES?
A: Video-EEG telemetry with a captured typical event showing normal EEG during the event. No clinical feature alone is sufficient for diagnosis. The combination of video semiology + simultaneous normal EEG confirms the diagnosis.
Q6
Name the 6 items of the NDDI-E and its cutoff score for probable MDD.
A: Six items (each scored 1–4, total 6–24): 1. Everything is a struggle 2. Nothing I do is right 3. Feel guilty 4. I'd be better off dead 5. Frustrated 6. Difficulty finding pleasure Cutoff ≥ 15 = probable MDD (sensitivity 81%, specificity 90%) Memory: GDNFEP, Guilty, Dead (better off), Nothing right, Frustrated, Everything a struggle, Pleasure difficulty.
Q7
Why is NDDI-E preferred over PHQ-9 for screening depression in epilepsy?
A: PHQ-9 contains somatic items (fatigue, sleep disturbance, concentration difficulties, appetite changes) that overlap with AED side effects and postictal effects, producing false positives. NDDI-E focuses exclusively on cognitive-emotional items, avoiding somatic confounders.
Q8
Describe the bidirectional relationship between epilepsy and depression.
A: - Epilepsy → Depression: TLE causes limbic-serotonergic disruption; AED side effects (phenobarbital, topiramate, LEV); psychosocial burden (stigma, driving restrictions). Depression in ~30–50% of TLE. - Depression → Epilepsy: Prior depression is an independent risk factor for developing epilepsy (RR ~1.5–2.0). Shared mechanisms: serotonin dysregulation, HPA axis hyperactivity, hippocampal atrophy, neuroinflammation. - Shared neurobiology: Both involve serotonin, GABA, glutamate dysregulation and hippocampal pathology.
Q9
Which antidepressant is contraindicated in epilepsy and why?
A: Bupropion, it is the most proconvulsant antidepressant, with dose-dependent seizure risk. It is contraindicated in patients with epilepsy. TCAs and clomipramine are also high-risk and should be avoided. SSRIs (sertraline, escitalopram) are the safest antidepressants in epilepsy.
Q10
Rank the following antipsychotics from LOWEST to HIGHEST proconvulsant risk: Clozapine, Risperidone, Aripiprazole, Olanzapine, Quetiapine.
A: (Low → High) Aripiprazole < Risperidone < Olanzapine ≈ Quetiapine < Clozapine Clozapine: 3–5% seizure risk at high doses, highest of all antipsychotics. Aripiprazole: safest choice when an antipsychotic is needed in epilepsy.
Q11
Why is clozapine + carbamazepine absolutely contraindicated?
A: Dual agranulocytosis risk. Both clozapine and carbamazepine independently suppress bone marrow and can cause agranulocytosis. The combination dramatically increases this risk and is an absolute contraindication. Additionally, carbamazepine (strong CYP3A4 inducer) reduces clozapine plasma levels by 40–60%, creating a pharmacokinetic problem on top of the safety issue.
Q12
What are the five features of Geschwind syndrome?
A: The 5 H's: 1. Hypergraphia, compulsive excessive writing (most specific feature) 2. Hyperreligiosity, intense spiritual preoccupation 3. Hyposexuality, decreased (not increased) sexual interest 4. Hurts to leave / Viscosity, circumstantial, sticky thinking 5. Heightened/deepened affect, everything feels profound Associated with TLE, particularly MTLE. Existence as a distinct syndrome is debated.
Q13
What is the ILAE 2017 replacement for "complex partial seizure"?
A: Focal seizure with impaired awareness. The 2017 ILAE classification replaced "complex partial" with this term. "Simple partial" became "focal aware seizure." "Secondary generalised" became "focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizure."
Q14
Describe the classic triad of West syndrome and its first-line treatments.
A: Triad: 1. Infantile spasms (brief flexion/extension clusters, worst on waking) 2. Hypsarrhythmia (chaotic, high-amplitude, asynchronous EEG) 3. Developmental regression/arrest First-line: - ACTH, best overall evidence - Vigabatrin, first-line specifically if tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) is the aetiology (superior response in TSC) Age of onset: 3–12 months (peak 4–6 months). Psychiatric outcome: ASD in 30–50%, ID in 70–80%.
Q15
What is the EEG hallmark of Lennox-Gastaut syndrome?
A: Slow generalised spike-wave complexes at < 2.5 Hz (typically 1.5–2 Hz) on interictal EEG. During NREM sleep: paroxysmal fast activity (> 10 Hz, "recruiting rhythm"), highly specific for LGS. Background EEG is diffusely slow. Clinical triad: multiple seizure types (tonic hallmark + atonic drop attacks + atypical absence) + slow SWD EEG + intellectual disability.
Q16
What is the JME classic triad and its most important seizure trigger?
A: Triad (MAG): - Myoclonic jerks (morning, on waking, most characteristic) - Absence seizures (~30% of patients) - GTC seizures (often triggered by sleep deprivation) Most important trigger: Sleep deprivation. Alcohol withdrawal, photosensitivity (30–50%), and stress are secondary triggers. JME is lifelong in >80%, requires long-term AED. Valproate is most effective but teratogenic; levetiracetam and lamotrigine are alternatives for women.
Q17
What is the teratogenic risk profile of valproate?
A: - Major congenital malformations: ~10–11% (vs. 1–2% baseline) - Neural tube defects: 1–2% (vs. 0.05% baseline) - Other structural: Cardiac defects, orofacial clefts, limb anomalies, hypospadias - Neurodevelopmental (most important): IQ reduction ~7–9 points; autism risk 6×; ADHD increased, these effects are dose-dependent and independent of structural malformations MHRA 2018 / 2024: Valproate MUST NOT be prescribed to girls/women of childbearing potential without PREVENT programme enrolment and annual review. Folic acid 5 mg/day must be started ≥3 months before conception.
Q18
How does an oral contraceptive pill (OCP) interact with lamotrigine?
A: The OCP (combined, oestrogen-containing) reduces lamotrigine plasma levels by approximately 50% through induction of lamotrigine glucuronidation (UGT enzymes). This can cause breakthrough seizures when the OCP is started and lamotrigine toxicity (rash, dizziness, diplopia) when it is stopped (e.g., pill-free week). Women on lamotrigine + OCP require dose monitoring and adjustment. Conversely, enzyme-inducing AEDs (carbamazepine, phenytoin, phenobarbital) reduce OCP efficacy, IUD is preferred contraception for women on these AEDs.
Q19
What is the Indian regulatory requirement for driving after epilepsy?
A: Under the Motor Vehicles Act 1988 and Central Motor Vehicles Rules 1989, a person with epilepsy must be seizure-free for ≥ 2 years (on or off medication) to be eligible for a driving licence. This is more stringent than the UK (1 year). Clinical obligation: document driving counselling at every visit, record the advice given, and advise reporting to the licensing authority if the patient refuses to stop driving against medical advice.
Q20
Describe the 3 Hz spike-wave discharge, what condition is it pathognomonic of?
A: 3 Hz generalised spike-wave discharge (SWD), regular, bilaterally synchronous, frontally dominant, is pathognomonic of Childhood Absence Epilepsy (CAE). It occurs in bursts of 3–30 seconds, correlates precisely with clinical absences, is provoked by hyperventilation, and is suppressed by eye opening (photic driving). The regularity and frequency (exactly 3 Hz) distinguish it from the slower, irregular SWD of Lennox-Gastaut (<2.5 Hz) and faster polyspike-wave of JME (4–6 Hz).
Q21
What is the most common form of autoimmune encephalitis and how does it present psychiatrically?
A: Anti-NMDAR encephalitis (antibodies against GluN1 subunit of NMDA receptor). Psychiatric presentation sequence: 1. Prodrome: Fever, headache, malaise 2. Psychiatric phase: Agitation, psychosis, behavioural disturbance, often the presenting complaint to psychiatry 3. Seizures (focal and generalised) 4. Movement disorders (orofacial dyskinesias, choreoathetosis) 5. Autonomic instability 6. Decreased consciousness → coma Demographics: Young women; 40% associated with ovarian teratoma. Diagnosis: CSF anti-GluN1 antibodies (more sensitive than serum). Treatment: Immunotherapy (steroids, IVIG, plasmapheresis) + tumour removal if present.
Q22
What is the ILAE 2015 operational definition of convulsive status epilepticus?
A: A seizure lasting ≥ 5 minutes OR two or more seizures without full recovery of consciousness between them. This replaced the older "30-minute" definition. The 30-minute threshold (T2) represents when neuronal injury begins, not the operational threshold for treatment. Clinical implication: treat any seizure still ongoing at 5 minutes as status epilepticus, do not wait for 30 minutes.
Q23
Name the second-line AEDs for status epilepticus with doses.
A: | Drug | Dose | |------|------| | Levetiracetam IV | 60 mg/kg (max 4500 mg), preferred: minimal interactions, no cardiac monitoring | | Valproate IV | 40 mg/kg (max 3000 mg), avoid in pregnancy, hepatic disease, mitochondrial disorders | | Phenytoin IV | 20 mg/kg (max 1500 mg), cardiac monitoring required; slow infusion | | Lacosamide IV | 200–400 mg, emerging option | Used at 20–40 minutes if first-line benzodiazepines fail.
Q24
What is Interictal Dysphoric Disorder (IDD)? Name its 8 symptoms.
A: Described by Blumer (2004), an epilepsy-specific mood disorder characterised by intermittent dysphoria that does not map cleanly onto DSM-5 diagnoses. Distinct from MDD by its paroxysmal, mixed quality. 8 symptoms in 2 groups: Depressive (DEAF): - Depressive mood - Energia absent (anergia) - Ache/pain (somatic) - Falling asleep difficulty (insomnia) Labile/Irritable (PFIE): - Paroxysmal affective disturbances - Fear/anxiety (episodic) - Irritability - Euphoric moods (brief, episodic) Key distinction from MDD: The brief euphoric periods and intermittent course.
Q25
What is NCSE and why is it a psychiatric emergency?
A: Non-Convulsive Status Epilepticus (NCSE), prolonged (≥10 minutes) epileptic activity without major motor manifestations, manifesting as altered consciousness, behavioural change, or psychosis. Requires EEG confirmation. Psychiatric emergency because: - Can present as acute psychosis, confusion, mutism, bizarre behaviour, mimicking primary psychiatric disorders - Missed diagnosis = ongoing neuronal injury - Any patient with known epilepsy presenting with acute psychiatric symptoms + fluctuating consciousness + subtle motor automatisms → get an EEG immediately Diagnostic trial: IV lorazepam 0.1 mg/kg, if clinical and EEG improvement = confirms NCSE. Treat aggressively as per SE protocol.
Q26
Describe the three patterns of catamenial epilepsy (Herzog classification).
A: | Pattern | Timing | Mechanism | |---------|--------|-----------| | C1 Perimenstrual | Days −3 to +3 (around menstruation) | Abrupt progesterone withdrawal → relative oestrogen dominance | | C2 Periovulatory | Days 10–13 (ovulation) | Oestrogen surge (proconvulsant) at mid-cycle | | C3 Anovulatory | Days 10–28 (entire luteal phase) | Chronically low progesterone throughout the second half | Mechanism: Oestrogen is proconvulsant (lowers seizure threshold); progesterone is anticonvulsant (positive allosteric modulator of GABA-A). Treatments: acetazolamide (perimenstrual), progesterone supplementation, continuous OCP.
Q27
What psychiatric sequelae can occur after epilepsy surgery (anterior temporal lobectomy)?
A: - De novo depression: 5–20% develop new depression within the first year post-surgery (most common psychiatric complication) - De novo psychosis: 1–5%; higher risk if history of postictal psychosis or bilateral foci - Forced normalisation: Can occur post-surgery when seizures stop, psychosis emerges paradoxically - Anxiety improvement: Usually improves with seizure freedom - Quality of life improvement: Generally positive with Engel I outcome (seizure-free ~70% in MTLE with hippocampal sclerosis) Pre-existing depression is the strongest predictor of poor post-surgical psychiatric outcome.
Q28
What are the psychiatric comorbidities of tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC)?
A: | Comorbidity | Prevalence in TSC | |-------------|-----------------| | ASD | 40–50% (higher than in West syndrome without TSC) | | Intellectual disability | 50% (varies widely by genotype/tuber burden) | | ADHD | 30–50% | | Anxiety disorders | 30–40% | | OCD features | 20–30% | | Aggression/behavioural problems | Common | TSC is caused by mutations in TSC1 (hamartin) or TSC2 (tuberin), mTOR pathway dysregulation. Everolimus (mTOR inhibitor) reduces subependymal giant cell astrocytomas and may modestly improve cognitive outcomes. Early vigabatrin (even pre-symptomatic) reduces ASD risk in TSC-associated infantile spasms.
Q29
Classify EEG rhythms from fastest to slowest and state one clinical association for each.
A:
| Rhythm | Frequency | Key Clinical Association | |--------|-----------|--------------------------| | Gamma | >30 Hz | Cognitive processing; research | | Beta | 13–30 Hz | Alert state; increased by benzodiazepines | | Alpha | 8–13 Hz | Relaxed, eyes closed; reduced in depression (frontal asymmetry) | | Theta | 4–7 Hz | Drowsiness; temporal theta in TLE interictal | | Delta | 0.5–3 Hz | Deep sleep; diffuse = delirium; focal = structural lesion | CJD: Periodic sharp wave complexes (PSWCs) at 1–2 Hz, pathognomonic. Hypsarrhythmia: Chaotic, asynchronous delta + multifocal spikes, West syndrome.
Q30
Summarise the management of PNES in 6 steps.
A: 1. Establish diagnosis definitively, video-EEG telemetry with captured event (do not diagnose on clinical grounds alone) 2. Disclose the diagnosis therapeutically, lead with what it IS (functional nervous system disorder); acknowledge it is real, disabling, not deliberate; never say "nothing is wrong" or "it's all in your head" 3. Psychotherapy, primary treatment, seizure-specific CBT (strongest evidence); trauma-focused CBT or EMDR if PTSD present 4. Treat psychiatric comorbidities, SSRIs for depression; trauma-focused therapy for PTSD; DBT skills for BPD 5. Gradual AED withdrawal (if no comorbid epilepsy), in collaboration with neurology; prepare patient for possible short-term increase in events (extinction burst) 6. Prognosis counselling, 30–40% achieve seizure freedom; 50% substantial improvement; poorer outcomes with longer diagnostic delay, secondary gain, comorbid personality disorder
BONUS: 10 One-Line Facts for Last-Minute Revision
Cross-reference: D1 (Study Notes) for depth · D2 (Model Answers) for written practice · D3 (Mnemonics) for retrieval cues · D4 (Comparisons) for differential tables · PYQ Analysis for question prediction