← All study guides
Guide 09 · Part II

Anxiety OCD

Paper II · Clinical Psychiatry. Six study modes, from notes to quick review.

Most askedOCD management algorithmPTSD evidence-based treatmentY-BOCS structure and scoringOCD neurobiology CSTC circuitClark's cognitive model panicClomipramine vs SSRIs OCD
Jump to a section
Chapter 01

Study Notes

Sources: Kaplan & Sadock's Comprehensive Textbook of Psychiatry (10th ed.), Stahl's Essential Psychopharmacology (4th ed.), Oxford Textbook of Psychiatry, ICD-11 (2022), DSM-5-TR (2022)


TABLE OF CONTENTS

  1. Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD)
  2. Panic Disorder
  3. Agoraphobia
  4. Social Anxiety Disorder (SAD)
  5. Specific Phobias
  6. Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD)
  7. Treatment-Resistant OCD
  8. PTSD & Acute Stress Disorder
  9. Adjustment Disorder
  10. Separation Anxiety Disorder (Adults)
  11. OCD Spectrum Disorders (Hoarding, BDD, Trichotillomania, Excoriation)
  12. Anxiety in Medical Illness
  13. Substance-Induced Anxiety

1. GENERALIZED ANXIETY DISORDER (GAD)

1.1 Diagnostic Criteria

Exam Pearl

The key distinction between GAD and normal worry: GAD worry is excessive, hard to control, and causes significant functional impairment. Duration threshold: 6 months in DSM-5; "more days than not" for several months in ICD-11.

DSM-5 Criteria (F41.1)
ICD-11 Criteria (6B00)
Clinical Anchor

DSM-5 requires 3 of 6 somatic symptoms; ICD-11 is less specific about number. Both require 6 months (DSM-5 explicit; ICD-11 "several months"). ICD-11 groups under "Anxiety or Fear-Related Disorders."

1.2 Epidemiology

Parameter · Value
Lifetime prevalence 5.7% (general population)
12-month prevalence 3.1%
Sex ratio F:M = 2:1
Peak onset Late adolescence/early adulthood; also mid-life
Comorbidity High: major depression (>60%), other anxiety disorders, somatic disorders
Course Chronic, waxing/waning; rarely spontaneous remission without treatment

1.3 Neurobiology

Amygdala-PFC Circuit (Fear Circuitry)

In GAD:

Exam Pearl

Amygdala = phasic fear (immediate, stimulus-specific). BNST = sustained anxiety (non-specific, anticipatory). GAD involves BNST more than amygdala per se.

Neurotransmitter Systems

GABA:

Serotonin (5-HT):

Norepinephrine (NE):

Glutamate:

CRF (Corticotropin-Releasing Factor):

1.4 Pharmacotherapy

First-Line Agents
DrugClassDose RangeOnset of ActionNotes
EscitalopramSSRI10–20 mg/day2–4 weeks (full effect 6–8 wks)Best tolerated, minimal CYP interactions
SertralineSSRI50–200 mg/day2–4 weeksStrong evidence base
Paroxetine CRSSRI12.5–62.5 mg/day2–4 weeksMore sedating; discontinuation syndrome risk
Venlafaxine XRSNRI75–225 mg/day2–4 weeksFDA-approved; BP monitoring
DuloxetineSNRI60–120 mg/day2–4 weeksFDA-approved; helpful with somatic symptoms
Second-Line Agents
DrugClassDoseNotes
Buspirone5-HT1A partial agonist15–60 mg/day (TID dosing)No dependence; 2–4 week onset; no benefit if prior BZD use; no acute effect
Pregabalinα2δ calcium channel ligand150–600 mg/dayFDA/EMA approved for GAD; rapid onset (1 week); sedation, weight gain; Schedule V (US)
TCAs (imipramine)TCA75–200 mg/dayEffective but side effect burden; QTc monitoring
Adjuncts / Short-term
Drug · Notes
Benzodiazepines For acute/severe anxiety; avoid long-term use (dependence, cognitive effects); use lowest dose for shortest duration; clonazepam preferred (longer half-life, less abuse potential vs alprazolam)
Hydroxyzine Antihistamine; 25–50 mg PRN or TID; no dependence; reasonable for short-term
Quetiapine Atypical AP; evidence for GAD; use when comorbid MDD or insomnia
Propranolol For performance anxiety / somatic symptoms; not for generalized anxiety
Exam Pearl

Buspirone takes 2–4 weeks. It will NOT work if the patient has previously been on benzodiazepines (BZD occupies receptors, reducing anxiolytic effect, "receptor downregulation" argument). Switch to buspirone only after BZD taper.

Treatment Algorithm (GAD)

1.5 Psychotherapy for GAD

Cognitive-Behavioural Therapy (CBT)

Borkovec's Avoidance Model of Worry:

Metacognitive Therapy (Wells):

Acceptance & Commitment Therapy (ACT)

2. PANIC DISORDER

2.1 Diagnostic Criteria

Exam Pearl

A panic attack is NOT a disorder, it is a specifier. Panic disorder requires RECURRENT unexpected panic attacks PLUS persistent concern or behaviour change for ≥1 month.

DSM-5 Criteria (F41.0)

Panic Attack (not a diagnosis itself, a specifier):

13 symptoms, ≥4 required:

  1. Palpitations / pounding heart / accelerated heart rate
  2. Sweating
  3. Trembling or shaking
  4. Shortness of breath / smothering sensation
  5. Feelings of choking
  6. Chest pain / discomfort
  7. Nausea / abdominal distress
  8. Dizziness / unsteady / lightheaded / faint
  9. Chills or hot flushes
  10. Paresthesias (numbness/tingling)
  11. Derealization / depersonalization
  12. Fear of losing control / going crazy
  13. Fear of dying

Panic attacks are abrupt surges reaching peak within minutes; can be expected (cued) or unexpected (uncued/spontaneous).

Panic Disorder requires:

ICD-11 Criteria (6B01)

2.2 Epidemiology

Parameter · Value
Lifetime prevalence 3.5–4.7%
12-month prevalence 2–3%
Sex ratio F:M = 2:1
Onset Bimodal: late teens/early 20s and mid-30s
Comorbidity Agoraphobia (30–50%), major depression (50%), other anxiety disorders
Course Chronic; waxing/waning; full recovery in minority

2.3 Clark's Cognitive Model of Panic

Exam Pearl

Clark's model is the most frequently examined cognitive model for panic. Know all 4 components and the maintenance cycle.

Core premise: Panic attacks result from the catastrophic misinterpretation of bodily sensations.

Maintaining factors:

  1. Selective attention / hypervigilance to bodily sensations
  2. Safety behaviours (sitting down, calling ambulance), prevent disconfirmation
  3. Avoidance of triggers, prevents learning
  4. Anticipatory anxiety, increases physiological arousal before next attack

Treatment implications (Clark's model CBT):

2.4 Neuroanatomy of Panic

Suffocation Alarm Theory (Klein, 1993)

Key brain regions:

Neurochemistry:

2.5 Pharmacotherapy

First-Line
DrugDoseNotes
SSRIs (all)Standard dosesEscitalopram, sertraline, paroxetine FDA-approved; start LOW (may worsen anxiety initially)
Venlafaxine XR75–225 mgFDA-approved; good evidence
Second-Line
DrugDoseNotes
Clomipramine75–250 mgVery effective but side effect burden
Imipramine75–250 mgHistorical gold standard; Klein's work
Alprazolam0.5–10 mg/dayRapid onset; FDA-approved; dependence risk; CR formulation preferred
Clonazepam1–4 mg/dayLonger half-life; less euphorigenic
Exam Pearl

Start SSRIs at HALF the usual dose in panic disorder. Full-dose initiation can cause initial jitteriness/increased panic that leads patients to discontinue. Titrate slowly over 2–4 weeks.

Duration of treatment: Minimum 12 months after remission; 2+ years if recurrent.

2.6 CBT for Panic Disorder

Highly effective (60–80% response); may be superior to pharmacotherapy in long-term follow-up.

Components:

  1. Psychoeducation, Clark's model, nature of panic/anxiety, fight-or-flight
  2. Breathing retraining, diaphragmatic breathing (caution: may become safety behaviour)
  3. Cognitive restructuring, challenging catastrophic misinterpretations
  4. Interoceptive exposure, deliberately inducing feared sensations:
  5. Spinning in chair (dizziness)
  6. Running in place (palpitations, breathlessness)
  7. Breathing through straw (choking sensation)
  8. Staring at point on wall (derealization)
  9. In vivo exposure, entering avoided situations (combined with situational exposure for agoraphobia)
  10. Eliminating safety behaviours

3. AGORAPHOBIA

3.1 Diagnostic Criteria (DSM-5: F40.00)

Key Insight

EXAM PEARL (DSM-5 change): Agoraphobia is now a separate diagnosis from Panic Disorder. Previously required link to panic. Now stands alone. Can occur with or without panic disorder.

3.2 Management


4. SOCIAL ANXIETY DISORDER (SAD)

4.1 Diagnostic Criteria

DSM-5 (F40.10)

Specifier: "Performance only", if fear limited to public speaking/performing

Performance-only vs Generalized SAD
FeaturePerformance-onlyGeneralized SAD
Situations fearedPublic speaking, performingMost/all social situations
Functional impairmentOccupationalBroader (social, occupational)
ComorbidityLessMore (MDD, other anxiety)
PharmacotherapyPropranolol PRN effectiveRequires regular SSRI/SNRI
PrognosisBetterChronic course

4.2 Assessment: Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale (LSAS)

4.3 Cognitive Model (Clark & Wells, 1995)

  1. Social situation perceived social threat
  2. Self-focused attention (focuses on internal sensations/thoughts about performance)
  3. Safety behaviours (avoiding eye contact, over-preparing, rehearsing)
  4. Problematic processing before and after events
  5. Negative self-image as a social object

4.4 Pharmacotherapy

DrugClassEvidenceNotes
SertralineSSRIFDA-approvedFirst-line
Paroxetine CRSSRIFDA-approvedFirst-line
Venlafaxine XRSNRIFDA-approvedFirst-line
EscitalopramSSRIStrong RCT dataNot FDA-approved for SAD but widely used
PhenelzineMAOIHighly effectiveSecond/third-line; dietary restrictions; orthostatic hypotension
ClonazepamBZDAdjunctRapid onset; for acute performance anxiety
PropranololBeta-blockerPerformance anxiety10–40 mg PRN 30–60 min before; not for generalized SAD
Gabapentinα2δ ligandSecond-lineUseful in alcohol dependence comorbidity

4.5 Psychotherapy

CBT components:

Social skills training: For those with genuine skills deficits (not just inhibition)


5. SPECIFIC PHOBIAS

5.1 Classification (DSM-5 Specifiers)

  1. Animal type (spiders, insects, dogs, snakes)
  2. Natural environment type (heights, storms, water)
  3. Blood-injection-injury (BII) type, unique: vasovagal response (bradycardia, hypotension fainting)
  4. Situational type (airplanes, elevators, enclosed spaces)
  5. Other type (vomiting, loud sounds, costumed characters)
Exam Pearl

BII phobia is the ONLY phobia with a diphasic cardiovascular response: initial tachycardia followed by paradoxical bradycardia and hypotension (vasovagal syncope). Treatment includes applied tension technique (tensing large muscle groups to raise BP).

5.2 Psychological Theories of Origin

  1. Classical conditioning (Pavlovian), traumatic conditioning (dog bite dog phobia)
  2. Observational learning, watching others fear (vicarious conditioning)
  3. Information transmission, told snakes are dangerous
  4. Preparedness theory (Seligman), biologically prepared to fear evolutionarily dangerous stimuli (snakes, heights, spiders), these phobias are resistant to extinction

5.3 Treatment

Systematic Desensitization (Wolpe)
Flooding (Implosion Therapy)
Virtual Reality Exposure Therapy (VRET)
Pharmacotherapy (Limited Role)

6. OBSESSIVE-COMPULSIVE DISORDER (OCD)

6.1 Diagnostic Criteria

DSM-5 (F42)

Insight specifiers:

Tic-related specifier: if current or past history of tic disorder

ICD-11 (6B20)
Exam Pearl

OCD was moved from Anxiety Disorders to its own chapter in BOTH DSM-5 AND ICD-11. This reflects distinct neurobiology (CSTC circuit vs fear circuit).

6.2 Common OCD Symptom Dimensions

DimensionObsessionsCompulsions
ContaminationDirt, germs, illnessWashing, cleaning
Harm/aggressionHurting self/othersChecking, reassurance-seeking
Symmetry/orderThings not "just right"Ordering, counting, arranging
Forbidden thoughtsSexual, blasphemous, tabooMental neutralizing, praying
HoardingLoss of items, incompletenessCollecting, saving
SomaticIllness, bodily sensationsBody checking

6.3 Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS)

Exam Pearl

Y-BOCS is the gold standard OCD severity measure. Know the two subscales, 5 items each, and scoring thresholds.

Structure:

Five dimensions per subscale (O = obsessions, C = compulsions):

  1. Time occupied (O)/Time spent on (C)
  2. Interference with functioning
  3. Distress/anxiety caused
  4. Resistance (degree of effort to resist)
  5. Control (ability to control/stop)

Severity thresholds:

Score · Severity
0–7 Subclinical
8–15 Mild
16–23 Moderate
24–31 Severe
32–40 Extreme

Response to treatment: ≥35% reduction in Y-BOCS score

Y-BOCS-II: Updated version with insight modifier; broader content coverage.

OCI-R (OCD Inventory Revised): 18-item self-report; 6 subscales; used in research and screening.

6.4 Neurobiology: CSTC Circuit

Exam Pearl

CSTC = Cortico-Striato-Thalamo-Cortical circuit. This is THE neurobiology circuit for OCD. Must know the direct (go) and indirect (stop) pathways.

CSTC Circuit Architecture

In OCD (Saxena & Rauch model):

ComponentNormalOCD
Direct pathway (go)BalancedHyperactive releases thalamus drives repetitive behaviour
Indirect pathway (stop)BalancedUnderactive fails to stop thalamic activation
OFCNormal "error signal"Overactive, generates excessive "something is wrong" signal
CaudateNormal gatingHypofunctional as a gate, fails to suppress drive signals
ThalamusNormal relayHyperactivated drives motor cortex compulsions

NET RESULT: Overactive OFC generates error signals overactive direct pathway drives repetition compulsions are the brain's failed attempt to resolve the "error signal."

Why SSRIs work: 5-HT modulates striatal and thalamic function; chronic SSRI use normalizes caudate hypermetabolism (seen on FDG-PET).

Neuroimaging Evidence
Serotonin Hypothesis

6.5 Pharmacotherapy

First-Line: SSRIs
Exam Pearl

OCD requires higher doses of SSRIs than depression, and longer treatment trials (10–12 weeks minimum). Response rates: ~50–60% with first SSRI.

DrugStarting DoseTarget DoseMaximum Dose
Fluoxetine10–20 mg40–60 mg80 mg
Fluvoxamine50 mg150–200 mg300 mg
Sertraline25–50 mg150–200 mg200 mg
Paroxetine10–20 mg40–60 mg60 mg
Escitalopram10 mg20–40 mg40 mg (off-label high dose)
Citalopram20 mg40 mg40 mg (QTc concern above)

All 5 SSRIs are FDA-approved for OCD. Fluvoxamine was first (1994).

Clomipramine
Exam Pearl

Clomipramine = most efficacious single agent for OCD (effect size ~1.0 vs SSRIs ~0.5–0.7). But side effect profile limits first-line use.

Mechanism TCA; serotonin reuptake inhibitor + NRI; active metabolite (desmethylclomipramine) is NRI
Efficacy Superior to all SSRIs in head-to-head comparisons; also superior to desipramine (controls for TCA)
Dose 25–50 mg start 100–250 mg/day
Side effects Anticholinergic (dry mouth, constipation, urinary retention), sedation, weight gain, orthostatic hypotension, seizures (>250 mg), sexual dysfunction
QTc Cardiac monitoring required at higher doses
Drug interactions Avoid MAOIs (serotonin syndrome); fluvoxamine inhibits CYP1A2 raises clomipramine levels
Preferred in Severe/refractory OCD; patients who failed 2+ SSRIs
SSRIs vs Clomipramine: Key Comparison
FeatureSSRIsClomipramine
EfficacyModerate (~0.5–0.7 ES)High (~1.0 ES)
TolerabilityBetterWorse
Safety in overdoseSaferDangerous (cardiac, seizures)
Drug interactionsVariable by CYPMore
First-line statusYes (all 5 SSRIs)Second-line (first-line in some guidelines)
Monitoring requiredMinimalQTc, seizure threshold, BP
Sexual side effectsCommonCommon
Role in pregnancyPreferredAvoid if possible
Augmentation Strategies
Exam Pearl

The standard augmentation for OCD is a low-dose antipsychotic added to an SSRI or clomipramine. Risperidone and haloperidol have the most evidence.

Augmenting AgentEvidenceDoseNotes
RisperidoneBest RCT evidence0.5–2 mg/dayFor OCD without tic disorder
HaloperidolGood evidence2–10 mg/dayEspecially with comorbid tic disorder
AripiprazoleGood evidence5–15 mg/dayWell-tolerated; weight-neutral
QuetiapineModerate evidence25–200 mg/dayHelpful if comorbid anxiety/insomnia
OlanzapineSome evidence2.5–10 mg/dayWeight gain concern
ClonazepamAdjunct0.5–2 mg/dayShort-term anxiety reduction
ClomipramineAdd to SSRILow dose (25–100 mg)Monitor clomipramine levels; combination raises risk
D-cycloserineEnhances ERP50–100 mg before sessionFacilitates extinction learning

6.6 Psychotherapy: Exposure and Response Prevention (ERP)

Exam Pearl

ERP is the psychological treatment of choice for OCD. Effect size ~1.0–1.5 (superior to pharmacotherapy alone). Combines exposure with ritual prevention.

Principles of ERP

Theoretical basis:

Components:

  1. Exposure: Contact with feared stimulus/situation (in vivo, imaginal, or interoceptive)
  2. Response Prevention: Deliberately refraining from compulsions

Process:

Critical rule: The anxiety WILL peak and then decrease. Compulsions terminate anxiety prematurely and reinforce the obsession-compulsion cycle.

Variants of ERP
Inference-Based CBT (I-CBT)
ACT for OCD

6.7 Neuromodulation and Surgery

Neurosurgery for OCD

Indicated only for: severe, treatment-resistant OCD, failing ≥3 adequate SRI trials + adequate ERP, significant disability, Y-BOCS >30.

ProcedureTargetMechanismEvidence
Anterior capsulotomyAnterior limb of internal capsule (ALIC)Interrupts CSTC circuit~40–70% response; lesional
Anterior cingulotomyAnterior cingulateDisrupts ACC-OFC loop25–40% response; lesional
Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS)ALIC/NAcc/BNST/STNModulates CSTC; reversibleFDA Humanitarian Device Exemption (2009); 40–60% response
Gamma Knife RadiosurgeryALIC (bilateral)Radiation capsulotomyNon-invasive; delayed effect (6–12 months)

DBS targets for OCD:

Exam Pearl

DBS for OCD received FDA approval via Humanitarian Device Exemption (HDE) in 2009, not full approval. Requires multidisciplinary team, ethics board review, and informed consent. It is reversible (unlike ablative procedures).

Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS)

7. TREATMENT-RESISTANT OCD

7.1 Definition

Treatment-resistant OCD = failure to achieve ≥35% Y-BOCS improvement after:

7.2 Management Algorithm

7.3 IV Clomipramine

7.4 Other Strategies


8. PTSD & ACUTE STRESS DISORDER

8.1 PTSD Diagnostic Criteria (DSM-5: F43.10)

Exam Pearl

DSM-5 restructured PTSD into 4 symptom clusters (was 3 in DSM-IV). Added negative alterations in cognition and mood as a separate cluster. Minimum age for PTSD: separate criteria for children ≤6 years.

Criterion A, Trauma exposure (at least one):

  1. Directly experiencing traumatic event
  2. Witnessing in person
  3. Learning that close person experienced violent/accidental death/threatened death/sexual violence
  4. Repeated/extreme indirect exposure (first responders, forensic workers), NOT media exposure

Qualifying traumatic events: actual or threatened death, serious injury, or sexual violence

Criterion B, Intrusion (≥1):

  1. Intrusive distressing memories
  2. Recurrent distressing dreams
  3. Dissociative reactions (flashbacks), range from brief to complete loss of awareness
  4. Intense/prolonged psychological distress at internal/external trauma cues
  5. Marked physiological reactions to trauma cues

Criterion C, Avoidance (≥1):

  1. Avoidance of distressing memories, thoughts, feelings
  2. Avoidance of external reminders (people, places, situations, activities)

Criterion D, Negative alterations in cognition and mood (≥2):

  1. Inability to remember important aspects (dissociative amnesia)
  2. Persistent/exaggerated negative beliefs about self/world ("I am bad")
  3. Persistent distorted blame of self/others
  4. Persistent negative emotional state (fear, horror, anger, guilt, shame)
  5. Diminished interest/participation in activities
  6. Feelings of detachment or estrangement from others
  7. Persistent inability to experience positive emotions (emotional numbing, anhedonia)

Criterion E, Alterations in arousal and reactivity (≥2):

  1. Irritable behaviour and angry outbursts
  2. Reckless or self-destructive behaviour
  3. Hypervigilance
  4. Exaggerated startle response
  5. Concentration problems
  6. Sleep disturbance

Criterion F: ≥1 month duration

Criterion G: Significant distress/functional impairment

Criterion H: Not substance/medical

Specifiers:

Complex PTSD (ICD-11: 6B41)

ICD-11 recognizes Complex PTSD as a distinct disorder (not in DSM-5):

Typically follows prolonged/repeated trauma (childhood abuse, domestic violence, trafficking, torture).

8.2 Acute Stress Disorder (ASD: F43.0)

Duration: 3 days to 1 month post-trauma (PTSD requires >1 month)

DSM-5 criteria:

Exam Pearl

ASD vs PTSD: Duration is the key distinction. ASD = 3 days–1 month; PTSD = >1 month. ASD predicts PTSD risk (but most people with ASD do not develop PTSD, and many who develop PTSD did not have ASD).

8.3 Ehlers & Clark Cognitive Model of PTSD (2000)

Exam Pearl

This is the dominant cognitive model for PTSD and underlies CT-PTSD (cognitive therapy for PTSD).

Two core processes generate persistent PTSD:

  1. Appraisal of the traumatic event and/or its sequelae as a current serious threat:
  2. "I am permanently changed/damaged"
  3. "Nowhere is safe"
  4. "I am going mad" (about PTSD symptoms themselves)
  1. Nature of the trauma memory, autobiographical memory characteristics:
  2. Poor contextual embedding (trauma memory lacks time/place context)
  3. Strong associative triggering (sensory cues trigger intrusions without conscious recall)
  4. "Data-driven processing" during trauma (sensory focus, not conceptual) weak elaboration

Maintaining behaviours:

Treatment (CT-PTSD, Ehlers & Clark):

  1. Identify and modify appraisals ("update" threat appraisals)
  2. Trauma memory elaboration (write/revisit in detail add context/meaning)
  3. Drop safety behaviours
  4. Address triggers/discriminating stimuli

8.4 Pharmacotherapy for PTSD

First-Line
DrugDoseFDA ApprovalNotes
Sertraline50–200 mgYESFirst-line; good tolerability
Paroxetine20–60 mgYESFirst-line; discontinuation syndrome risk
Venlafaxine XR75–300 mgNO (but strong evidence)Often used as first-line
Second-Line / Adjuncts
DrugUseNotes
PrazosinNightmares and sleep disturbanceAlpha-1 antagonist; 1–15 mg at night; Raskind's trials; reduces nightmare frequency/intensity
FluoxetinePTSD (broader anxiety)Not FDA-approved but evidence
MirtazapineSleep, nightmares, depression comorbidity15–45 mg; promotes sleep
QuetiapineComorbid insomnia/MDD, augmentation25–300 mg
RisperidoneAugmentation (co-occurring psychotic features)Low dose
BenzodiazepinesNOT recommended for PTSDNo evidence; may worsen PTSD course by interfering with extinction; increase risk of substance dependence
PropranololAcute phase (within 6 hrs), memory reconsolidation blockadeExperimental; not standard of care
MDMA-assisted therapyPhase 3 trials (MAPS); breakthrough therapyNot yet approved (2026); shown >67% PTSD resolution in trials
Exam Pearl

Benzodiazepines are CONTRAINDICATED in PTSD. They do not reduce PTSD symptoms and may worsen long-term outcomes by interfering with extinction and increasing dependence.

8.5 Psychotherapy for PTSD

Trauma-Focused CBT (TF-CBT) / CPT / PE

These are first-line psychological treatments:

1. Cognitive Processing Therapy (CPT, Resick):

2. Prolonged Exposure (PE, Foa):

3. Cognitive Therapy for PTSD (CT-PTSD, Ehlers & Clark):

4. Eye Movement Desensitisation and Reprocessing (EMDR):

Exam Pearl

EMDR is a first-line treatment for PTSD (WHO guidelines, NICE guidelines). The eye movements (bilateral stimulation) may be the specific ingredient or may be non-specific.


9. ADJUSTMENT DISORDER (F43.2)

9.1 Diagnostic Criteria (DSM-5)

Subtypes:

9.2 ICD-11 Adjustment Disorder (6B43)

9.3 Key Distinctions

FeatureAdjustment DisorderMDDPTSD
Stressor requiredYes (identifiable)NoYes (traumatic)
Time to onset<3 monthsVariable<1 month (ASD) / variable (PTSD)
Duration after stressor<6 monthsCan be independent>1 month
Trauma criterionNot requiredNoYes (death/serious injury/sexual violence)
Intrusions/flashbacksNoNoYes

9.4 Treatment


10. SEPARATION ANXIETY DISORDER IN ADULTS (F93.0)

10.1 Key Points

10.2 Treatment


11. OCD SPECTRUM DISORDERS

11.1 Overview

DSM-5 groups these under "Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders" (OCRD):

DisorderCore FeatureKey Feature
OCDObsessions + compulsionsEgo-dystonic; insight present
Body Dysmorphic Disorder (BDD)Preoccupation with perceived defectChecking/camouflage behaviours
Hoarding DisorderDifficulty discardingAcquisition + cluttering
TrichotillomaniaHair pullingTension before, relief after
Excoriation DisorderSkin pickingTension/relief cycle
Illness Anxiety (Somatic OCD spectrum)Health-related preoccupation

11.2 Hoarding Disorder (F42.3)

Exam Pearl

Hoarding is a separate disorder in DSM-5 (not a subtype of OCD). It has distinct neurobiology (anterior cingulate, insula, not CSTC). Response to SSRIs is poorer than OCD.

Diagnostic criteria (DSM-5):

Specifiers:

Neurobiology:

Treatment:

11.3 Body Dysmorphic Disorder (BDD: F45.22)

Exam Pearl

BDD shares neurobiology with OCD (CSTC) but has distinct features. Patients present to dermatology/plastic surgery more than psychiatry. Suicide risk is high.

Diagnostic criteria (DSM-5):

Specifiers:

Common preoccupations: Skin, nose, hair, eyes, chin, lips (face most common); any body part possible

Key features:

Pharmacotherapy:

Psychotherapy:

11.4 Trichotillomania (Hair-Pulling Disorder: F63.3)

DSM-5 criteria:

Sites: Scalp (most common), eyebrows, eyelashes, pubic hair, axillary hair

Phenomenology:

Treatment:

11.5 Excoriation Disorder (Skin-Picking: F42.4)

DSM-5 criteria:

Treatment: Same as trichotillomania, HRT is first-line; NAC; clomipramine


12. ANXIETY IN MEDICAL ILLNESS

12.1 Overview

Clinical Anchor

Anxiety is the MOST common psychiatric complication of medical illness. Always rule out medical causes before diagnosing primary anxiety disorder.

12.2 Medical Conditions Causing Anxiety

SystemConditionsKey Anxiety Features
CardiovascularMI, arrhythmias, mitral valve prolapse, heart failurePalpitations, chest pain, dyspnea, mimic panic
RespiratoryCOPD, asthma, pulmonary embolism, hypoxiaBreathlessness, suffocation, panic-like
EndocrineHyperthyroidism, hypothyroidism, pheochromocytoma, hypoglycemia, Cushing's, Addison'sPheochromocytoma: episodic panic-like attacks (hypertension, palpitations, sweating, headache)
NeurologicalEpilepsy (especially TLE ictal anxiety), encephalitis, CNS tumors, Parkinson's, MSIctal fear in TLE; anxiety in early dementia
MetabolicElectrolyte imbalances, vitamin B12 deficiency, folate deficiency, hypocalcemiaAnxiety with paresthesias
InfectiousLyme disease, HIV, COVID-19 (Long COVID)Multi-system involvement
AutoimmuneSLE, anti-NMDA encephalitisPsychiatric features prominent early
MedicationsCorticosteroids, bronchodilators (albuterol), caffeine, theophylline, thyroid hormonesIatrogenic anxiety

Key investigations to rule out medical causes:

12.3 Cancer and Anxiety

12.4 Pheochromocytoma: The Great Mimicker


13. SUBSTANCE-INDUCED ANXIETY

13.1 DSM-5 Criteria

13.2 Common Substances

Substance/MedicationAnxiety DuringAnxiety During
IntoxicationWithdrawal
CaffeineYes (anxiety, panic)Headache > anxiety
CannabisYes (THC panic, paranoia)Mild anxiety
Stimulants (cocaine, amphetamines)Yes (anxiety, panic, paranoia)Post-crash dysphoria, anxiety
AlcoholDisinhibition (some anxiety reduction)Severe anxiety, panic, seizures, DTs
BenzodiazepinesParadoxical agitation (rare)Severe anxiety, panic, seizures
OpioidsMild sedationAnxiety, dysphoria, sweating
Hallucinogens (LSD, PCP)Panic, paranoia, derealizationHPPD may involve anxiety
NicotineMild anxiolysisAnxiety, irritability
CorticosteroidsAnxiety, insomnia, hypomania
Thyroid hormoneAnxiety, palpitations
Beta-agonists (salbutamol)Tremor, palpitations, anxiety
Exam Pearl

Alcohol withdrawal is medically dangerous and causes severe anxiety. BZD withdrawal is similar, both involve GABA-A receptor adaptation. Always assess temporal relationship of anxiety to substance use. If anxiety persists >1 month after cessation, consider independent anxiety disorder.


QUICK REFERENCE TABLES

Pharmacotherapy Summary Table

DisorderFirst-Line PharmaSecond-LineAugmentation
GADSSRI, SNRIBuspirone, pregabalinQuetiapine, BZD (short-term)
Panic DisorderSSRI, SNRIClomipramine, BZD
SADSSRI, SNRIPhenelzine, gabapentinBZD (short-term)
Specific PhobiaNone (psychological first)BZD PRND-cycloserine (augment ERP)
OCDSSRI (high dose)ClomipramineLow-dose antipsychotic (risperidone, aripiprazole)
PTSDSertraline, paroxetineVenlafaxine, mirtazapinePrazosin (nightmares), quetiapine
BDDHigh-dose SSRIClomipramineAntipsychotic augmentation
TrichotillomaniaNACClomipramine, olanzapine

Psychotherapy Summary Table

DisorderFirst-Line PsychotherapyKey Techniques
GADCBTCognitive restructuring, worry postponement, PMR
Panic DisorderCBT (Clark's model)Interoceptive exposure, cognitive restructuring
SADCBT (Clark & Wells)Attention training, video feedback, exposure
Specific PhobiaSystematic desensitisation / FloodingGraded exposure hierarchy
OCDERPExposure + response prevention hierarchy
PTSDTF-CBT, PE, CPT, EMDRTrauma processing, appraisal modification
BDDCBT (Veale)ERP + attentional training
HoardingCBT-HSorting, categorizing, cognitive restructuring
TrichotillomaniaHRTAwareness + competing response training

Study Notes compiled for PG exams MD Psychiatry exit examination. Sources: Kaplan & Sadock (10th ed.), Stahl's Essential Psychopharmacology (4th ed.), Oxford Textbook of Psychiatry, DSM-5-TR, ICD-11.

Chapter 02

Model Answers

Format: Each answer is structured for a 10-mark long essay. Target: 3–4 A4 pages of handwriting (~800–1000 words in exam). Write: introduction body (structured with subheadings) conclusion.


Q1. Discuss the management of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder. [10 marks]

Answer:

Introduction

OCD is a chronic neuropsychiatric disorder characterised by obsessions (recurrent intrusive thoughts/images/urges) and/or compulsions (repetitive behaviours or mental acts). It affects 2–3% of the population, causes marked functional impairment, and ranks among the top 10 most disabling conditions (WHO). Management requires a biopsychosocial approach combining pharmacotherapy, psychotherapy, and, in refractory cases, neuromodulation.

Assessment

Before initiating treatment, a thorough assessment is essential:

Pharmacotherapy

Step 1, First-line: SSRIs

All five SSRIs are FDA-approved for OCD:

Drug · Dose Range
Fluoxetine 40–80 mg/day
Fluvoxamine 150–300 mg/day
Sertraline 100–200 mg/day
Paroxetine 40–60 mg/day
Escitalopram 20–40 mg/day

Key principles:

Step 2, If SSRI inadequate: Switch or add clomipramine

Clomipramine (75–250 mg/day): most efficacious agent (effect size ~1.0 vs SSRIs ~0.5–0.7). Limitations: anticholinergic side effects, QTc prolongation, seizures at high doses, overdose risk. Monitor ECG and plasma levels.

Step 3, Augmentation (if partial response)

Low-dose antipsychotics added to SRI:

Psychotherapy: Exposure and Response Prevention (ERP)

ERP is the gold-standard psychological treatment (effect size 1.0–1.5).

Principles:

  1. Construct anxiety hierarchy (SUDS 0–100 scale)
  2. Planned exposure to feared stimuli/situations
  3. Response prevention, deliberately withhold compulsive ritual
  4. Prolonged exposure (~45 min/session) until SUDS reduces 50%
  5. Begin at moderate SUDS (40–50), not lowest

Mechanism: Inhibitory learning, new non-threatening associations form; anxiety peaks then habituates without performing compulsion.

CBT additions: Cognitive restructuring of overestimated threat/responsibility; psychoeducation; relapse prevention.

Intensive ERP: Daily sessions (2–3 weeks) for severe/refractory cases.

Combined Treatment

Meta-analyses demonstrate that SSRI + ERP is superior to either alone. Combination is recommended for moderate-severe OCD.

Treatment-Resistant OCD

Defined as failure of ≥2 SSRI trials + 1 clomipramine trial + adequate ERP. Options:

Duration and Maintenance

Conclusion

OCD management follows a stepped approach: SSRI + ERP as foundation, augmentation for partial response, neuromodulation for refractory cases. The combination of pharmacotherapy and ERP delivers the best outcomes. Long-term maintenance is essential given the chronic course of OCD.

Exam Strategy

Structure answer as: Assessment Pharmacotherapy (Steps 1-2-3) Psychotherapy (ERP) Combination Refractory cases Duration. Examiners expect a management algorithm, not a list. Always mention Y-BOCS for assessment and ERP as the psychotherapy of choice.


Q2. Compare SSRIs and clomipramine in the treatment of OCD. [10 marks]

Answer:

Introduction

OCD is treated with serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SRIs). Both SSRIs and clomipramine (a tricyclic with potent SRI activity) are effective, but they differ in efficacy, tolerability, safety, and clinical application.

Pharmacological Mechanisms

PropertySSRIsClomipramine
Primary mechanismSelective serotonin reuptake inhibitionSerotonin + norepinephrine reuptake inhibition
Active metaboliteNone (or weak)Desmethylclomipramine (potent NRI)
Receptor affinity5-HT transporter highly selectiveAlso: H1, muscarinic, alpha-1, Na+ channel blockade
Selectivity for serotoninHighModerate (lost with active metabolite)

Efficacy

MeasureSSRIsClomipramine
Effect size (Y-BOCS reduction)0.5–0.7~1.0
Direct comparison (meta-analyses)Inferior to clomipramineSuperior to all SSRIs
Response rate~50–60%~60–70%
Zohar's landmark studyDesipramine (NRI) < clomipramineConfirms serotonin specificity

Tolerability and Side Effects

Side EffectSSRIsClomipramine
Nausea, GI symptomsCommonModerate
Dry mouthMild (paroxetine more)Marked
ConstipationMildMarked
Urinary retentionMinimalSignificant
SedationMild (fluvoxamine more)Significant
Weight gainModerateSignificant
Sexual dysfunctionCommon (delayed ejaculation, anorgasmia)Common
Orthostatic hypotensionRareSignificant
QTc prolongationCitalopram ≥40 mgYes, ECG monitoring required
SeizuresRareYes, especially >250 mg
Serotonin syndrome (with MAOIs)YesYes

Safety in Overdose

FeatureSSRIsClomipramine
CardiovascularMinimalDangerous (QRS widening, VT, VF)
SeizuresRareYes
CNS depressionMildComa possible
Margin of safetyWideNarrow
Exam Pearl

Clomipramine overdose = cardiac arrhythmia + seizures. SSRIs are much safer in overdose, important in OCD patients who may have comorbid depression/suicidality.

Drug Interactions

FeatureSSRIsClomipramine
CYP enzyme inhibitionVaries (fluoxetine/fluvoxamine: significant)Less CYP
Fluvoxamine + clomipramineRaises clomipramine levels (CYP1A2 inhibition), risk of toxicity
MAOI interactionSerotonin syndromeSerotonin syndrome

Monitoring Requirements

ParameterSSRIsClomipramine
ECGBaseline for citalopramBaseline + regular
Plasma drug levelsNot routineYes (therapeutic range: 150–300 ng/mL; >450 ng/mL toxic)
Blood pressureRoutineOrthostatic BP
Seizure historyNoteContraindicated if seizure disorder

Special Populations

PopulationSSRIsClomipramine
PregnancyPreferred (sertraline)Avoid if possible
ElderlyPreferredAvoid (anticholinergic burden, falls)
Children (>10 years)First-line (fluvoxamine, sertraline)Second-line
Cardiac diseasePreferredContraindicated/caution
Comorbid tic disorderAdd haloperidolCan use; haloperidol augmentation

Guidelines Recommendation

Conclusion

Clomipramine is more efficacious but SSRIs are better tolerated and safer. Current guidelines recommend SSRIs as first-line due to the tolerability advantage, reserving clomipramine for SSRI failures or severe refractory cases. The ideal pharmacological approach may be to start with an SSRI, then use clomipramine augmentation or substitution in partial responders.

Exam Strategy

Use a comparison table as the centrepiece. Cover: mechanism efficacy tolerability safety interactions monitoring special populations. End with clinical recommendation. 10 marks = ~10 distinct points.


Q3. Discuss evidence-based treatments for PTSD. [10 marks]

Answer:

Introduction

Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a potentially chronic condition arising after exposure to actual/threatened death, serious injury, or sexual violence. It affects ~8% of trauma-exposed individuals and features intrusion, avoidance, negative cognitions/mood, and hyperarousal. Evidence-based treatments include trauma-focused psychotherapies and pharmacotherapy.

Assessment Framework

Trauma-Focused Psychotherapies (First-Line)

1. Prolonged Exposure (PE, Foa et al.)

2. Cognitive Processing Therapy (CPT, Resick et al.)

3. Cognitive Therapy for PTSD (CT-PTSD, Ehlers & Clark)

4. Eye Movement Desensitisation and Reprocessing (EMDR, Shapiro)

Comparative efficacy:

All four therapies are equivalent in systematic reviews; choice based on patient preference, therapist training, comorbidities.

What Does NOT Work

Pharmacotherapy

First-line (FDA-approved):

Evidence-based (not FDA-approved):

Adjuncts:

Duration: Minimum 12 months; 2+ years if recurrent/severe.

Emerging Treatments

Special Considerations

Conclusion

Trauma-focused psychotherapies (PE, CPT, CT-PTSD, EMDR) are the cornerstone of PTSD treatment. Pharmacotherapy (SSRIs, venlafaxine) is adjunctive or for those who decline/cannot access psychotherapy. Prazosin specifically addresses nightmares. The combination of trauma-focused therapy + SSRI is recommended for severe/chronic cases.

Exam Strategy

Examiners want evidence-based specifics, not vague statements. Name the therapist/originator of each therapy. Mention NICE, VA/DoD guidelines. Discuss what NOT to do (debriefing, BZDs), this distinguishes a strong answer.


Q4. Describe the cognitive model of panic disorder and its therapeutic implications. [10 marks]

Answer:

Introduction

Panic disorder is characterised by recurrent unexpected panic attacks followed by persistent concern about future attacks or maladaptive behavioural changes. David Clark's (1986) cognitive model provides the most influential theoretical account of how panic attacks are generated and maintained, and directly informs cognitive-behavioural treatment.

Clark's Cognitive Model: Core Proposition

Catastrophic misinterpretation of bodily sensations is the central mechanism. Normal bodily sensations (palpitations, breathlessness, dizziness) are misinterpreted as evidence of imminent catastrophe (heart attack, going mad, losing control).

The Panic Attack Cycle

Maintaining Factors

1. Selective attention/hypervigilance to bodily sensations

Once in the cycle, attention narrows onto the body, this amplifies perceived sensation intensity.

2. Safety behaviours

Actions taken to prevent the feared catastrophe:

Safety behaviours MAINTAIN the disorder, they prevent disconfirmation of catastrophic beliefs and prevent learning.

3. Avoidance

Avoiding panic-provoking situations (shopping centres, exercise, caffeinated drinks) prevents exposure to disconfirming information. Leads to secondary agoraphobia.

4. Anticipatory anxiety

Fear of the next panic attack increased physiological arousal lower threshold for triggering next attack.

5. Interoceptive conditioning

Internal sensations become conditioned stimuli that trigger anxiety, even before reaching conscious awareness.

Neurobiological Complement: Suffocation Alarm Theory (Klein)

Klein proposed a hypersensitive CO2/suffocation alarm, panicogenic agents (CO2 inhalation, sodium lactate) trigger panic via this brainstem alarm, independent of cognitive appraisal. Explains why antidepressants (imipramine) prevent panic even before subjective beliefs change.

Therapeutic Implications: CBT for Panic Disorder

Clark's model maps directly onto treatment:

Model Component · Treatment Technique
Catastrophic misinterpretation Cognitive restructuring, challenge misinterpretations, probability estimation
Selective attention/hypervigilance Attention shifting, external focus; defocus from body
Safety behaviours Behavioural experiments, drop safety behaviours; test catastrophic predictions
Avoidance In vivo exposure, graded approach to avoided situations
Interoceptive conditioning Interoceptive exposure, deliberately induce feared sensations
Anticipatory anxiety Psychoeducation + anxiety management

Interoceptive exposure exercises:

Sensation to induce · Method
Palpitations/breathlessness Running on spot 1 minute
Dizziness/lightheadedness Spinning in chair
Choking sensation Breathing through narrow straw
Derealization Staring at point on wall 2 minutes
Paresthesias Overbreathing (hyperventilation)

Key CBT components:

  1. Psychoeducation (fight-or-flight response, anxiety is not dangerous)
  2. Breathing retraining (caution: can become safety behaviour)
  3. Cognitive restructuring (alternative explanations for sensations)
  4. Interoceptive exposure
  5. In vivo exposure (± situational exposure for agoraphobia)
  6. Safety behaviour elimination
  7. Relapse prevention

Efficacy

CBT for panic disorder: response rate 60–80%; may be superior to pharmacotherapy in long-term follow-up (lower relapse). NICE recommends CBT as first-line.

Conclusion

Clark's cognitive model identifies catastrophic misinterpretation as the engine of panic disorder. It generates a clear, testable, and therapeutically actionable formulation. CBT derived from this model, particularly interoceptive exposure and safety behaviour elimination, is highly effective and represents the gold standard psychological treatment for panic disorder.

Exam Strategy

Draw the cycle diagram in the exam, it earns marks and organises the answer. Follow with maintaining factors, then map model treatment technique as a table. 10 marks = model description (4 marks) + therapeutic implications (6 marks).


Q5. Discuss the pharmacotherapy of Generalised Anxiety Disorder (GAD). [10 marks]

Answer:

Introduction

GAD is characterised by excessive, uncontrollable worry about multiple domains for ≥6 months, with somatic symptoms (muscle tension, fatigue, poor sleep, difficulty concentrating, irritability, restlessness). Pharmacotherapy is effective and often combined with psychotherapy. Treatment should follow a stepped approach.

Neuropharmacological Rationale

GAD involves dysregulation of three key systems:

First-Line Agents

SSRIs:

DrugStarting DoseTarget DoseFDA Approval
Escitalopram5–10 mg10–20 mgYes
Paroxetine CR12.5 mg37.5–62.5 mgYes
Sertraline25–50 mg100–200 mgNo (but strong evidence)

Key principles:

SNRIs:

DrugStarting DoseTarget DoseFDA Approval
Venlafaxine XR37.5–75 mg75–225 mgYes
Duloxetine30 mg60–120 mgYes

SNRIs provide dual action on serotonin and norepinephrine, helpful when somatic symptoms dominate (muscle pain, fatigue).

Second-Line Agents

Buspirone:

Pregabalin:

TCAs (imipramine):

Short-Term / Adjunctive Agents

Benzodiazepines:

Hydroxyzine:

Atypical antipsychotics:

Treatment Algorithm

Special Considerations

PopulationPreferred AgentAvoid
ElderlyEscitalopram, buspironeLong-acting BZDs, TCAs
PregnancySertraline, escitalopramParoxetine (cardiac malformations Gr D), BZDs (cleft palate)
Comorbid depressionSNRI, SSRIBuspirone (treats anxiety not depression)
Comorbid painDuloxetine, pregabalin
Substance misuse historyBuspirone, SSRIBZDs, pregabalin
Cardiac diseaseEscitalopram, sertralineTCAs (QTc), citalopram >40 mg

Duration of Treatment

Conclusion

SSRIs and SNRIs are first-line pharmacotherapy for GAD, combined with psychotherapy (CBT) for optimal outcomes. Buspirone and pregabalin are useful alternatives. Benzodiazepines should be reserved for acute/short-term use. The chronic nature of GAD means long-term maintenance therapy is often required.

Exam Strategy

Structure as: Neuropharmacological rationale First-line Second-line Adjuncts Algorithm Special populations Duration. Don't just list drugs, explain WHY each works (mechanism). That's what earns marks.


Q6. Describe the neurobiology of anxiety. [10 marks]

Answer:

Introduction

Anxiety is a normal adaptive response to perceived threat. Pathological anxiety involves dysregulation of threat detection, appraisal, and extinction circuits. The neurobiology involves multiple interacting systems: limbic structures, monoaminergic pathways, GABAergic circuits, neuropeptides, and the HPA axis.

Key Brain Structures

Amygdala:

Prefrontal Cortex (PFC):

Anterior Cingulate Cortex (ACC):

Hippocampus:

Bed Nucleus of Stria Terminalis (BNST):

Locus Coeruleus (LC):

Periaqueductal Grey (PAG):

Neurotransmitter Systems

Serotonin (5-HT):

GABA:

Norepinephrine:

Glutamate:

Dopamine:

CRF/Neuropeptides:

HPA Axis

CSTC Circuit (OCD-specific)

Summary Table

Structure/SystemAnxiety RoleDisorder Link
Amygdala (BLA/CeA)Fear detection and responseAll anxiety disorders, PTSD
vmPFCExtinction; amygdala inhibitionPTSD (reduced), GAD
OFC/ACCError signalsOCD (hyperactive)
BNSTSustained anxietyGAD
LC / NEArousal, somatic symptomsPanic disorder
HippocampusContextual fearPTSD (volume reduction)
5-HTModulates fear/compulsion circuitsAll anxiety disorders, OCD
GABAInhibits amygdalaGAD, Panic (BZD mechanism)
HPA/CortisolThreat response, fear consolidationPTSD
CSTCHabit/repetitive behaviourOCD

Conclusion

Anxiety disorders involve dysregulation of interconnected neural circuits spanning brainstem (LC, PAG), limbic (amygdala, hippocampus, BNST), and cortical (PFC, OFC, ACC) structures, modulated by serotonin, norepinephrine, GABA, and glutamate systems. Understanding this neurobiology explains both the phenomenology of anxiety disorders and the mechanism of effective treatments.

Exam Strategy

Draw a circuit diagram if time permits. Structure as: brain structures neurotransmitters HPA axis summary table. This is a high-yield question, appears almost every year in some form.


Q7. What is Y-BOCS? Describe its structure and clinical utility. [10 marks]

Answer:

Introduction

The Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS) is the gold-standard clinician-administered instrument for assessing OCD severity. Developed by Goodman et al. (1989), it evaluates the severity of obsessions and compulsions independently of their content, making it sensitive to treatment change and useful across OCD symptom dimensions.

Development and Rationale

Prior to Y-BOCS, rating scales conflated symptom content with severity. Y-BOCS solved this by:

Structure

Format: Semi-structured clinician-administered interview

Total items: 10 (5 for obsessions, 5 for compulsions)

Scoring: Each item 0 (none) to 4 (extreme) total range 0–40

Five dimensions (same for both subscales):

ItemWhat it MeasuresScale Anchors
1/6. Time occupiedHours per day consumed by O/C0 = none; 4 = >8 hr/day or nearly constant
2/7. Interference with functioningSocial/occupational disruption0 = none; 4 = incapacitating
3/8. Distress/anxietySubjective distress caused by O/C0 = none; 4 = near-constant, disabling
4/9. ResistanceEffort to resist O/C0 = always resists; 4 = completely yields
5/10. ControlAbility to stop O/C0 = complete control; 4 = no control
Exam Pearl

Note that for Resistance (item 4/9): lower score = MORE resistance. This is the opposite direction from other items. Common exam trap.

Severity Classification

Total Score · Severity
0–7 Subclinical
8–15 Mild
16–23 Moderate
24–31 Severe
32–40 Extreme

Y-BOCS Symptom Checklist

The Y-BOCS is administered with a symptom checklist (separate from the severity scale) that identifies which obsessions and compulsions are present across all dimensions:

Response Criteria

Outcome · Y-BOCS Criterion
Response ≥35% reduction from baseline
Remission Score ≤8 (some use ≤12)
Partial response 25–34% reduction
Non-response <25% reduction
Worsening Increase from baseline

Insight Assessment (Part of Administration)

Before completing the scale, clinician rates insight:

Updated Versions

Y-BOCS-II (2010):

CY-BOCS: Children's version (Scahill et al.), validated for ages 6–17

Other OCD Scales

ScaleFormatSubscalesUtility
OCI-RSelf-report, 18 items6 (washing, checking, ordering, obsessing, hoarding, neutralising)Screening, dimensional assessment
DOCSSelf-report, 20 items4 OCD dimensionsResearch; dimensional severity
PADUA InventorySelf-report, 60 items5Research use

Clinical Utility

1. Baseline assessment: Establish severity before starting treatment

2. Treatment monitoring: Administer every 4–6 weeks during treatment; Y-BOCS guides decisions:

3. Research: Standard outcome measure in all OCD clinical trials

4. Communicating with patients: Numeric score helps patients track progress concretely

5. Disability assessment: Supports documentation for leave, accommodation, treatment funding

6. Predicting prognosis: Higher baseline Y-BOCS, poorer insight, and washing/contamination dimension predict poorer pharmacotherapy response

Limitations

Conclusion

Y-BOCS remains the definitive instrument for OCD severity assessment in both clinical and research settings. It provides a reliable, valid, and content-independent measure of obsession and compulsion severity, guides treatment decisions, and defines response and remission. Every clinician managing OCD should be proficient in its administration.

Exam Strategy

Q on Y-BOCS almost always asks for: structure (10 items, 5+5, scoring 0-4) + severity thresholds + response criteria + clinical utility. Don't forget the symptom checklist distinction and the resistance item quirk.


Q8. Discuss the management of treatment-resistant OCD. [10 marks]

Answer:

Introduction

Treatment-resistant OCD is defined as failure to achieve a clinically significant response (≥35% Y-BOCS reduction) despite adequate trials of at least 2–3 SSRIs at maximum tolerated doses for ≥12 weeks each, one clomipramine trial, and adequate exposure and response prevention (ERP) therapy. It affects approximately 40–60% of OCD patients and represents a significant clinical challenge.

Assessment of "True" Resistance

Before labelling a case resistant, confirm:

Step-by-Step Management

Step 1: Optimise existing treatment

Step 2: Switch SRI

Step 3: Antipsychotic augmentation

AgentDoseEvidence Level
Risperidone0.5–2 mg/dayBest RCT evidence
Aripiprazole5–15 mg/dayGood evidence; well-tolerated
Haloperidol2–10 mg/dayEspecially with tic comorbidity
Quetiapine25–200 mg/dayModerate evidence; helps insomnia/anxiety
Olanzapine2.5–10 mg/dayLimited evidence; weight gain

Mechanism: D2 blockade in striatum augments SRI-mediated 5-HT effects on CSTC circuit.

Step 4: Glutamate modulators

Step 5: IV clomipramine

Step 6: Neuromodulation

TMS (Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation):

Step 7: Neurosurgery (Last Resort)

Criteria for neurosurgical referral:

ProcedureTargetTypeResponse Rate
DBSALIC/NAcc/STNReversible40–60%
Anterior capsulotomyALICAblative (lesion)40–70%
Anterior cingulotomyACCAblative25–40%
Gamma Knife capsulotomyALICRadiosurgical45–50% (delayed 6–12 months)

DBS details:

Emerging Strategies

Conclusion

Treatment-resistant OCD requires systematic escalation through optimised SRI therapy, antipsychotic augmentation, glutamate modulators, IV clomipramine, neuromodulation, and finally neurosurgery for the most severe cases. Ongoing ERP throughout all pharmacological steps is essential. Multidisciplinary care with realistic goal-setting is paramount.

Exam Strategy

Define resistance first. Then list escalation steps in order, examiners expect a structured algorithm. For neurosurgery section: name DBS, capsulotomy, cingulotomy, Gamma Knife with targets and response rates. The DBS FDA HDE detail (2009) is a distinguishing fact that earns marks.


Q9. Discuss Body Dysmorphic Disorder: clinical features, assessment, and management. [10 marks]

Answer:

Introduction

Body Dysmorphic Disorder (BDD) is classified in DSM-5 under Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders. It involves preoccupation with perceived defects in physical appearance that are unnoticeable or appear slight to others, causing significant distress and functional impairment. It is underdiagnosed because patients seek cosmetic treatment, not psychiatric care.

Epidemiology

Clinical Features

Core symptom: Preoccupation with ≥1 perceived appearance flaw, perceived as visible and significant, but objectively absent or minimal.

Common preoccupation sites: Skin (acne, scarring, texture) most common; nose, hair, eyes, lips, chin, face overall; any body part possible.

Muscle dysmorphia (bigorexia):

Repetitive behaviours (98% of patients):

Cognitive features:

Insight spectrum:

Suicide risk: HIGH

Differential Diagnosis

Condition · Distinguishing Feature
Anorexia nervosa Preoccupation specifically with weight/shape
Social anxiety disorder Fear of social scrutiny (performance); not appearance preoccupation
Major depression Negative self-evaluation global; not appearance-focused
OCD Ego-dystonic obsessions; multiple domains; content different
Delusional disorder (somatic) DSM-5 now subsumed under BDD
Illness anxiety disorder Preoccupation with disease/medical condition, not appearance

Assessment

Management

Pharmacotherapy:

DrugDoseEvidence
Fluoxetine40–80 mg/dayBest evidence (Phillips et al. RCTs)
Fluvoxamine150–300 mg/dayMultiple positive trials
Sertraline100–200 mg/dayRCT evidence
Escitalopram20–40 mg/dayOpen-label studies
Clomipramine100–250 mg/dayEffective; second-line

Key points:

Psychotherapy, CBT for BDD (Veale protocol):

Components:

  1. Psychoeducation, BDD model; how attention and safety behaviours maintain disorder
  2. Attention retraining: From self-focused internal (bodily sensations, imagined defect) to external (surroundings, other people)
  3. Exposure and Response Prevention (ERP):
  4. Exposure to avoided social situations
  5. Mirror ERP: structured mirror use (holistic, not zoomed in; with guidance)
  6. Drop safety behaviours (camouflage, reassurance-seeking, checking)
  7. Cognitive restructuring: Challenge "appearance assumptions" and self-referential beliefs
  8. Behavioural experiments: Test predictions about others' reactions
  9. Imagery rescripting: For early-life experiences that shaped appearance-related beliefs

What NOT to do:

Conclusion

BDD is a serious, often underdiagnosed condition with high suicide risk. It requires high-dose SSRIs and BDD-specific CBT. Cosmetic procedures are contraindicated. Early recognition in dermatology and plastic surgery settings is essential.

Exam Strategy

Cover epidemiology clinical features (types, repetitive behaviours, insight, suicide risk) differential diagnosis management. The "what not to do" section (no cosmetic procedures, no pimozide alone) earns marks. High suicide risk is a key clinical point.


Q10. Discuss agoraphobia: clinical features and management. [10 marks]

Answer:

Introduction

Agoraphobia is an anxiety disorder characterised by marked fear or anxiety about situations from which escape might be difficult or help unavailable in the event of a panic attack or panic-like symptoms. DSM-5 made agoraphobia an independent diagnosis (no longer requiring co-occurring panic disorder).

Diagnostic Criteria (DSM-5: F40.00)

Fear/anxiety related to ≥2 of:

  1. Using public transport (buses, trains, ships, planes)
  2. Being in open spaces (car parks, marketplaces, bridges)
  3. Being in enclosed spaces (shops, theatres, cinemas)
  4. Standing in line or being in a crowd
  5. Being outside of home alone

Situations feared because escape might be difficult or help unavailable if panic/panic-like symptoms develop.

Additional criteria: almost always provokes fear; actively avoided or endured with distress; disproportionate to actual danger; persistent (≥6 months); significant impairment.

Clinical Features

Relationship to Panic Disorder

FeatureAgoraphobia only (DSM-5)Panic Disorder + Agoraphobia
Panic attacksNot requiredPresent (unexpected)
Fear focusSituation (escape difficulty)Both attack itself + situational avoidance
SeverityOften severe due to avoidanceVariable
Treatment prioritySituational exposureBoth panic + situational exposure

Management

Assessment:

Psychotherapy, First Line:

Graded Exposure Therapy:

Example hierarchy:

StepSituationSUDS
1Stand at front door alone30
2Walk to end of road and back40
3Visit corner shop (off-peak)50
4Travel one bus stop with companion60
5Short trip to supermarket (quiet)70
6Supermarket at busy time alone85
7Shopping mall, busy day90

Partner-assisted exposure: If homebound; family members trained to support exposure without accommodation.

Internet-delivered CBT: For those unable to attend; some evidence base.

Pharmacotherapy:

Key principle: Pharmacotherapy WITHOUT exposure therapy has high relapse. Exposure is the active ingredient.

Prognosis

Conclusion

Agoraphobia causes severe functional impairment through avoidance. Graded exposure therapy is the cornerstone of treatment; pharmacotherapy (SSRIs) supports exposure work. Full independence is achievable with adequate treatment, though severe cases require prolonged, intensive work.

Exam Strategy

Include a sample fear hierarchy (tables score well) and explain that pharmacotherapy alone without exposure has high relapse. Mention the DSM-5 change (independent diagnosis). Distinguish from panic disorder clearly.


Model Answers compiled for PG exams MD Psychiatry exit examination. All clinical vignettes are fictitious. Sources: Kaplan & Sadock (10th ed.), Stahl's Essential Psychopharmacology (4th ed.), Oxford Textbook of Psychiatry, DSM-5-TR, ICD-11, NICE Guidelines.

Chapter 03

Mnemonics & Memory Tricks

How to use this file: Read each mnemonic actively, cover the expansion and attempt to recall before checking. Spaced repetition: review on Day 1, Day 3, Day 7, Day 14.


SECTION A: DIAGNOSTIC CRITERIA


1. GAD: The 6 Somatic Symptoms (DSM-5)

Mnemonic
FIRMS C
Letter · Symptom
F Fatigue
I Irritability
R Restlessness (keyed up / on edge)
M Muscle tension
S Sleep disturbance
C Concentration difficulty (mind going blank)

Usage: GAD needs ≥3 of 6 (adults); ≥1 of 6 (children). Duration: 6 months. Plus: excessive worry + difficulty controlling it.

Exam Pearl

"FIRMS C", think of a firm grip on a couch, anxiously. The anxious person is FIRM (tense, fatigued, irritable, restless, muscle tension, can't sleep or concentrate).


2. Panic Attack: 13 Symptoms

Mnemonic
CHEST PAIN DC2 F
Letter · Symptom
C Chest pain/discomfort
H Hot flushes or chills
E Elevated heart rate (palpitations, pounding)
S Shaking / trembling
T Tingling / paresthesias
P Paresthesias (covered above) use for: Panic, fear of dying
A Air (shortness of breath / smothering)
I I'm going crazy (fear of losing control)
N Nausea / abdominal distress
D Derealization / Depersonalization
C Choking sensation
2 (2 D's = Derealization + Depersonalization)
F Faintness / dizziness / lightheadedness

Shortcut: ≥4 symptoms, abrupt onset, peaks within minutes. Unexpected = panic disorder.

Exam Pearl

There are exactly 13 symptoms. ≥4 required for a panic attack. The most cardiac-mimicking (chest pain, palpitations, dyspnoea) are the ones that send patients to the ED.


3. OCD Neurocircuitry: CSTC Components

Mnemonic
COrtiCo STriatTo ThalamoCortical

Broken down:

Direct pathway (GO): Striatum inhibits GPi releases thalamus drives cortex

Indirect pathway (STOP): Striatum GPe STN GPi inhibits thalamus

In OCD:

Mnemonic
OCD = Overactive OFC, Crippled Caudate, Thalamus Too Talkative

4. PTSD: 4 Symptom Clusters (DSM-5)

Mnemonic

MNEMONIC: "I-A-N-A" (I Am Never Alright)

LetterClusterKey symptoms
IIntrusion (Criterion B)Flashbacks, nightmares, intrusive memories, physiological reactivity
AAvoidance (Criterion C)Avoid thoughts/feelings + external reminders
NNegative cognitions & mood (Criterion D)Amnesia, distorted blame, negative beliefs, emotional numbing, anhedonia
AArousal & reactivity (Criterion E)Hypervigilance, startle, irritability, recklessness, sleep, concentration

Duration: ≥1 month. Stressor: Criterion A (traumatic event, actual/threatened death, serious injury, sexual violence).

Exam Pearl

DSM-IV had 3 clusters (B, C, D). DSM-5 expanded to 4 by splitting avoidance/numbing into: Avoidance (C) + Negative cognitions/mood (D). Duration threshold did not change.


5. PTSD Symptom Cluster D: Negative Cognitions (7 items)

Mnemonic
BRAIN-AD
Letter · Symptom
B Blame of self/others (distorted, persistent)
R Reduced participation in activities
A Amnesia for important aspects of trauma
I Inability to experience positive emotions (emotional numbing)
N Negative beliefs about self/world ("I am bad; nowhere is safe")
A Alienation from others (detachment, estrangement)
D Dysphoric emotion state (persistent fear, horror, guilt, shame, anger)

6. Y-BOCS: 5 Severity Domains

Mnemonic

MNEMONIC: "TI DRC" (Time Is Daily Resistance Crucial)

Letter · Domain
T Time occupied by obsessions/compulsions
I Interference with functioning
D Distress caused
R Resistance (effort to resist)
C Control (ability to stop)

Each scored 0–4, × 2 subscales (O + C) = 0–40 total.

Exam Pearl

Resistance item is reverse-scored in clinical intuition, lower score = more resistance = better. 0 = always resists; 4 = completely yields. Don't confuse direction.


7. OCD Insight Specifiers: 4 Levels

Mnemonic

MNEMONIC: "GFPA" (Good Follows Poor to Absent)


SECTION B: PHARMACOLOGY


8. SSRIs Approved for OCD: 5 Drugs

Mnemonic
FLOPS
Letter · Drug
F Fluoxetine
L (f)Luvoxamine
O (escital)Opram, Escitalopram (off-label high dose)
P Paroxetine
S Sertraline

Note: Officially, 5 SSRIs approved by FDA: Fluoxetine, Fluvoxamine, Paroxetine, Sertraline + Clomipramine (TCA). Escitalopram is used at high doses off-label.

Exam Pearl

Fluvoxamine was the FIRST SSRI approved by FDA for OCD (1994). All 5 SSRIs require HIGHER doses and LONGER trials than for depression (10–12 weeks minimum).


9. Clomipramine Side Effects

Mnemonic
CAST-OQ
Letter · Side effect
C Constipation (anticholinergic)
A Anticholinergic bundle (dry mouth, urinary retention, blurred vision)
S Sedation (H1 blockade)
T Tachycardia / QTc prolongation
O Orthostatic hypotension
Q QT seizures (at doses >250 mg)

10. PTSD First-Line Pharmacotherapy

Mnemonic

MNEMONIC: "SPVP" (Sertraline Paroxetine Venlafaxine Prazosin)

Exam Pearl

Only 2 drugs are FDA-approved for PTSD: sertraline and paroxetine. Venlafaxine is treated as equivalent in most international guidelines. Prazosin specifically targets nightmares (Raskind trials).


11. Augmentation Options for OCD (Antipsychotics)

Mnemonic

MNEMONIC: "RHAHOQ" (Really Harsh Augmentation Has Outstanding Questions)

Letter · Drug
R Risperidone (best RCT evidence)
H Haloperidol (best with tic comorbidity)
A Aripiprazole (well-tolerated, good evidence)
H Haloperidol (repeated for emphasis, tics)
O Olanzapine (some evidence; weight gain)
Q Quetiapine (anxiety/insomnia comorbidity)

Simpler version: "RHAOOQ" Risperidone, Haloperidol, Aripiprazole, Olanzapine, Quetiapine


Mnemonic
BAD for PTSD
Letter · Drug
B Benzodiazepines (contraindicated, no evidence; worsens long-term outcome)
A Antipsychotics (not first-line; only for augmentation in severe cases)
D Debriefing (psychological debriefing / CISD, not only doesn't help, may harm)

SECTION C: THERAPY CONCEPTS


13. ERP Principles: Key Rules

Mnemonic
HELP NO MORE
Letters · Principle
Hierarchy Build anxiety hierarchy (SUDS 0–100); 8–12 steps
Exposure Direct contact with feared stimulus
Long exposure Minimum 45 minutes; wait for anxiety to peak and then drop ≥50%
Prevent Response prevention, NO ritual during exposure
No escape Premature termination reinforces avoidance
Order Start at moderate SUDS (~40–50), not lowest
Mode In vivo preferred; imaginal for harm obsessions
Own it Patient takes control gradually (therapist-assisted independent)
Repeat Regular practice; generalise across situations
Extinction New inhibitory learning; anxiety peaks then habituates

14. Clark's Panic Model: 4 Key Maintaining Factors

Mnemonic

MNEMONIC: "SASA" (Safety And Selective Attention)

Letter · Factor
S Selective attention/hypervigilance to body sensations
A Anticipatory anxiety (between attacks)
S Safety behaviours (sitting down, calling ambulance, avoiding exercise)
A Avoidance of feared situations and triggers

15. Specific Phobia Types: DSM-5 Classification

Mnemonic

MNEMONIC: "ANBSO" (Animals, Natural, Blood, Situational, Other)

LetterTypeExamples
AAnimalSpiders, dogs, insects, snakes
NNatural environmentHeights, storms, water, fire
BBlood-injection-injuryNeedles, blood draws, medical procedures
SSituationalAirplanes, elevators, enclosed places, driving
OOtherVomiting, choking, clowns, loud sounds
Exam Pearl

BII phobia is unique, vasovagal diphasic response: initial tachycardia (sympathetic) paradoxical bradycardia + hypotension (vasovagal). Treatment: applied tension technique (tense large muscles to raise BP before fainting). This is the ONLY phobia where relaxation is contraindicated.


16. OCD Spectrum Disorders: DSM-5 OCRD Chapter

Mnemonic

MNEMONIC: "HOBTE" (HOBby TEasing)

Letter · Disorder
H Hoarding Disorder
O OCD
B Body Dysmorphic Disorder (BDD)
T Trichotillomania (hair pulling)
E Excoriation Disorder (skin picking)
Exam Pearl

Hoarding has DISTINCT neurobiology from OCD (ACC + insula, NOT CSTC). SSRIs are LESS effective in hoarding. Treatment is CBT-H (Steketee & Frost protocol), not standard ERP.


17. EMDR: 8 Phases

Mnemonic
HP ADI BC RE
Letters · Phase
H History-taking and treatment planning
P Preparation
A Assessment (target image, negative cognition, VoC, emotion, SUDS, body location)
D Desensitisation (bilateral stimulation + focus on memory)
I Installation (positive cognition)
B Body scan
C Closure
RE Re-evaluation
Exam Pearl

EMDR Phase 3 (Assessment) includes: target image, negative cognition (NC), desired positive cognition (PC), Validity of Cognition (VoC, 1–7 scale), associated emotion, SUDS, body location of disturbance. This is the most detailed phase.


18. Cognitive Processing Therapy (CPT): 5 Stuck-Point Themes

Mnemonic

MNEMONIC: "STEEP" (Safety, Trust, Esteem, Energy, Power)

Letter · Theme
S Safety
T Trust
E Esteem
E Emotions (added for completeness)
P Power and Control

Official 5 themes: Safety, Trust, Power/Control, Esteem, Intimacy

Key Insight

Corrected MNEMONIC: "STPEI" "STeP-In" = Safety, Trust, Power, Esteem, Intimacy


19. Neurobiology of Anxiety: Key Structures

Mnemonic

MNEMONIC: "ALPHA" (Amygdala, Locus coeruleus, PFC, Hippocampus, Anterior cingulate)

LetterStructureRole
AAmygdalaFear detection, phasic fear response
LLocus CoeruleusNE hyperactivation somatic anxiety, panic
PPFC (vmPFC)Extinction memory; inhibits amygdala
HHippocampusContextual fear conditioning; PTSD volume loss
AAnterior cingulateError monitoring; OCD hyperactivity
Key Insight

Added: BNST = Bed Nucleus of Stria Terminalis = Better named the Background anxiety generator. Sustained/diffuse anxiety. GAD.


20. Hoarding Disorder: Key Distinguishing Features from OCD

Mnemonic
PAID OFF
FeatureHoardingOCD
PsychologyPositive emotion about possessionsAnxiety/disgust (ego-dystonic)
AcquisitionExcessive acquiringNot typical
InsightPoor to variableUsually fair-good
Distress sourceFrom DISCARDING (not possessions themselves)From obsessions (threat)
OFC-CSTCNOT CSTC; ACC/insulaCSTC primary
First-line therapyCBT-H (Steketee & Frost)ERP
FarmacotherapySSRIs LESS effectiveSSRIs highly effective

SECTION D: QUICK-FIRE RECALL


Rapid-Fire Card 1: Duration Criteria

Disorder · Duration Required
GAD ≥6 months
Panic Disorder ≥1 month persistent concern after attack
Social Anxiety ≥6 months
Specific Phobia ≥6 months
OCD Not specified (but time-consuming >1 hr/day)
PTSD ≥1 month
Acute Stress Disorder 3 days – 1 month
Adjustment Disorder ≤6 months after stressor terminates
Agoraphobia ≥6 months

Rapid-Fire Card 2: Neurobiology One-Liners

Disorder · Key Neurobiology Fact
GAD BNST (sustained anxiety), vmPFC hypoactivity
Panic Disorder LC (NE), PAG, CO2 suffocation alarm (Klein)
OCD CSTC circuit; OFC + caudate hypermetabolism on PET
PTSD Amygdala hyperreactivity; hippocampal volume loss; vmPFC hypoactivity
Social Anxiety Amygdala hyperreactivity to social threat cues
Specific Phobia BII: vasovagal diphasic response (unique)

Rapid-Fire Card 3: Y-BOCS Severity Thresholds

ScoreLabelClinical meaning
0–7SubclinicalNo treatment needed
8–15MildOutpatient, SSRI
16–23ModerateCombination SSRI + ERP
24–31SevereHigh-dose SSRI + intensive ERP
32–40ExtremeConsider augmentation / neuromodulation
≥35% reductionResponseStandard treatment response threshold

Rapid-Fire Card 4: First-Line Psychological Treatments

Disorder · First-Line Therapy
GAD CBT (worry + relaxation + cognitive restructuring)
Panic Disorder CBT (Clark's model: interoceptive exposure)
Social Anxiety CBT (Clark & Wells: attention training + exposure)
Specific Phobia Systematic desensitisation / graded exposure
OCD ERP (Exposure and Response Prevention)
PTSD PE / CPT / CT-PTSD / EMDR
Hoarding CBT-H (Steketee & Frost)
Trichotillomania HRT (Habit Reversal Training)
BDD CBT-BDD (Veale: ERP + attention retraining)

Rapid-Fire Card 5: Surgical Targets for OCD

ProcedureTarget StructureType
Anterior capsulotomyALIC (anterior limb of internal capsule)Ablative lesion
Anterior cingulotomyAnterior cingulate cortexAblative lesion
DBSALIC / NAcc / BNST / STNReversible stimulation
Gamma KnifeALIC (bilateral)Radiosurgical
Exam Pearl

DBS = only reversible option. FDA HDE 2009. Other procedures are ablative (permanent lesion). Gamma Knife is non-invasive but has delayed effect (6–12 months). Minimum criteria for surgery: Y-BOCS ≥30 + 3 failed adequate SRI trials + failed ERP.


Mnemonics file compiled for PG exams MD Psychiatry exit examination. Sources: Kaplan & Sadock (10th ed.), Stahl's Essential Psychopharmacology (4th ed.), DSM-5-TR, ICD-11.

Chapter 04

High-Yield Comparisons

How to use: Each table is a potential short-answer or part of a long essay. Test yourself by covering one column and recalling the other.


Table 1: GAD vs Panic Disorder vs Social Anxiety Disorder

FeatureGADPanic DisorderSocial Anxiety Disorder
Core fearMultiple domains of worry (health, finances, relationships, future)Recurrent unexpected panic attacks; fear of next attackScrutiny / negative evaluation by others
TriggerMultiple, diffuse, often no specific triggerUnexpected (spontaneous) initially; later situationalSocial / performance situations
Attack typeNo discrete attacks; chronic background worryDiscrete panic attacks (peak within minutes)Anxiety in social context; may have situational panic
Physical symptomsMuscle tension, fatigue, poor sleep (not autonomic surge)Autonomic surge: palpitations, breathlessness, dizziness, sweatingBlushing, trembling, sweating; visible to others, feared
AvoidanceModerate; avoids worrying topicsAgoraphobic avoidance of situations; limits activitiesAvoids social situations specifically
Duration≥6 months; chronic, unremittingVaries; may be episodic≥6 months
Worry contentReal-life multiple domainsWorry about attacks and their consequencesHumiliation, embarrassment, negative judgment
NeurobiologyBNST (sustained), vmPFC ↓, amygdala ↑LC/NE, PAG, CO2 alarm, amygdalaAmygdala hyperreactivity to social cues
First-line pharmaSSRI/SNRI, buspirone, pregabalinSSRI/SNRISSRI/SNRI; propranolol PRN (performance)
First-line therapyCBT (worry control, relaxation)CBT (Clark's model, interoceptive exposure)CBT (Clark & Wells: attention training, exposure)
Assessment toolGAD-7PDSS (Panic Disorder Severity Scale)LSAS (Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale)
PrognosisChronic; rarely remits without treatmentVariable; good with treatmentChronic without treatment
Sex ratioF:M = 2:1F:M = 2:1F:M ≈ 1:1 (or slight F preponderance)
Exam Pearl

All three share F:M preponderance and SSRI first-line pharmacotherapy. The KEY differentiators: worry CONTENT (multiple domains vs attacks vs social evaluation), attack presence (panic only), and avoidance TYPE (generalised vs agoraphobic vs social).


Table 2: OCD vs OCPD (Obsessive-Compulsive Personality Disorder)

FeatureOCDOCPD
DSM-5 locationAnxiety/OC-related disorders (Axis I equivalent)Personality Disorders, Cluster C (Axis II equivalent)
Core featureEgo-DYSTONIC obsessions and compulsionsEgo-SYNTONIC perfectionism and control
InsightUsually present (recognises irrationality)Absent, believes these traits are correct/virtuous
ContentContamination, harm, symmetry, forbidden thoughtsOrderliness, perfectionism, control, work over relationships
Repetitive behaviourCompulsions to neutralise anxiety (ego-dystonic)Rules/procedures because "that's the right way"
Ego-syntonic/dystonicDystonic, patient suffers; wants obsessions goneSyntonic, patient does not suffer; causes suffering to others
FlexibilityVery rigid during obsessional episode; desires changeRigid as a trait; inflexible about rules
InterpersonalMay be impaired due to OCD burdenSignificant, controlling of others, miserly, workaholic
TreatmentSSRIs + ERP (effective)Psychotherapy (schema therapy, PDT, CBT for PD); SSRIs less effective
Response to SSRIsGood (50–60% response)Limited evidence; not first-line
ComorbidityOCPD comorbid in ~20–30% OCD patientsCan co-occur with OCD but distinct
Prevalence2–3%2–8%
CriterionCauses distress/impairment to patientLong-standing pattern; pervasive across contexts
Exam Pearl

The EGO-SYNTONIC vs EGO-DYSTONIC distinction is the most tested differentiator. OCD patient: "I don't want these thoughts; they're horrible." OCPD patient: "I'm just thorough and careful, other people are sloppy." OCPD does NOT respond well to SSRI or ERP.


Table 3: PTSD vs Acute Stress Disorder vs Adjustment Disorder

FeaturePTSDAcute Stress Disorder (ASD)Adjustment Disorder
Stressor requiredYes, traumatic (Criterion A: death/injury/sexual violence)Yes, same as PTSD (traumatic)Yes, any identifiable stressor
Stressor severityTraumatic (life-threatening level)Traumatic (same)Any life event (job loss, divorce, illness)
Onset after stressorWithin 1 month; may have delayed expression (≥6 months specifier)Within 3 days of stressorWithin 3 months
Duration≥1 month3 days to 1 month<6 months after stressor terminates
Intrusion symptomsYes (Criterion B), flashbacks, nightmaresYes, intrusive memories, flashbacksNo specific intrusion cluster
AvoidanceYes (Criterion C)YesNot specific
DissociationWith dissociative specifierProminent (depersonalisation, derealization, amnesia)No
Negative cognitionsYes (Criterion D, prominent)Some (negative mood)Primarily depressed/anxious mood
ArousalYes (Criterion E)YesVariable
Relationship to PTSDPredicts PTSD risk (but not all ASD PTSD)Does not predict PTSD
First-line treatmentTF-CBT, PE, CPT, EMDR + SSRIsWatchful waiting; early brief CBT if neededSupportive therapy, brief CBT
PharmacotherapySertraline, paroxetineNot routinely indicated; limited roleSymptomatic (sleep, anxiety)
PrognosisChronic without treatmentMost remit spontaneously within 1 monthGood if stressor resolves
Exam Pearl

ASD and PTSD share the same Criterion A (traumatic stressor). Duration separates them: ASD = 3 days–1 month; PTSD = >1 month. Adjustment disorder accepts ANY stressor and has NO intrusion/flashback cluster. The stressor type is the first branching point in differential diagnosis.

Clinical Anchor

Not everyone exposed to trauma develops ASD or PTSD. Resilience factors (social support, prior mastery, low pre-existing anxiety) are protective. Up to 70% of ASD cases resolve without developing PTSD.


Table 4: Clomipramine vs SSRIs for OCD

FeatureClomipramineSSRIs (as a class)
MechanismSerotonin + norepinephrine reuptake inhibition; H1, muscarinic, alpha-1 blockadeSelective serotonin reuptake inhibition
Active metaboliteDesmethylclomipramine (potent NRI)None or weak
Effect size (Y-BOCS)~1.0 (highest of any single agent)0.5–0.7
Efficacy rankSuperior to all SSRIs in meta-analysesGood; comparable to each other
Response rate~60–70%~50–60%
TolerabilityWorseBetter
Anticholinergic effectsMarked (dry mouth, constipation, urinary retention, blurred vision)Minimal (paroxetine: mild)
SedationSignificant (H1 blockade)Mild (fluvoxamine more sedating)
Weight gainSignificantModerate
Orthostatic hypotensionYes (alpha-1 blockade)Rare
QTc prolongationYes, ECG monitoring requiredCitalopram ≥40 mg; others minimal
Seizure riskYes, especially >250 mgRare
Overdose dangerHIGH (cardiac arrhythmia, seizures, death)LOW
Sexual dysfunctionCommonCommon
Drug interactionsCYP1A2/2D6; fluvoxamine raises levels dangerouslyVariable by SSRI
Plasma monitoringYes (therapeutic: 150–300 ng/mL; toxic: >450 ng/mL)Not routine
ECG monitoringYesOnly citalopram >40 mg
Guideline positionSecond-line (first in some severe/refractory cases)First-line (all 5 FDA-approved)
Pregnancy safetyAvoid if possible (Category C/D)Preferred (sertraline safest)
ElderlyAvoid (anticholinergic burden, falls, cardiac)Preferred
Children (≥10 yr)Second-lineFirst-line (fluvoxamine, sertraline)
Combination useCan augment SSRI at low dose (25–75 mg)
IV formulationYes (for refractory OCD)No
Exam Pearl

The key exam question: "Despite clomipramine being MORE efficacious than SSRIs in OCD, why are SSRIs still first-line?" Answer: tolerability, safety in overdose (important given depression comorbidity), simpler monitoring, safer in elderly and pregnancy.


Table 5: CBT vs Pharmacotherapy in Anxiety Disorders

ParameterCBTPharmacotherapy
Onset of effectDelayed (4–8 sessions) but builds2–6 weeks (SSRIs); immediate (BZDs)
Long-term outcomeSuperior, lower relapse after discontinuationHigher relapse on discontinuation
MechanismInhibitory learning, extinction, cognitive change, neuroplasticityNeurotransmitter modulation (5-HT, NE, GABA)
Neurobiological changeNormalises amygdala reactivity; strengthens vmPFC inhibitionDirect receptor/transporter modulation
Relapse on stoppingLowerHigher (especially benzodiazepines)
Patient acceptabilityHigh (if accessible); requires engagementHigh (simpler to adhere)
Access barriersTrained therapist shortage; cost; timeWidely available; relatively inexpensive
Comorbid MDDCBT helpful but pharmacotherapy often neededSSRI/SNRI treats both
MaintenanceBooster sessions prevent relapseOngoing medication often required
CombinationCBT + pharma superior to either alone
Specific advantagePanic: interoceptive exposure; OCD: ERP; PTSD: trauma processingRapid symptom relief (BZDs); broad-spectrum (SSRIs)
Specific limitationRequires homework, commitment; avoidance prevents engagementSide effects; dependence (BZDs); sexual dysfunction
Evidence levelMultiple RCTs; similar effect sizes to pharmaMultiple RCTs; well-established
NICE recommendationFirst-line for all anxiety disorders (where accessible)First-line if CBT unavailable or patient preference
Cost-effectivenessMore cost-effective long-termLess cost-effective long-term (ongoing prescriptions)
Exam Pearl

For ALL anxiety disorders, CBT has comparable short-term efficacy to SSRIs, but LOWER relapse rates after treatment discontinuation. Combined CBT + pharmacotherapy shows additive benefit, especially in moderate-severe cases. The exception: benzodiazepines used during exposure may impair extinction learning (state-dependent learning problem).


Table 6: Fear vs Anxiety: Neurobiological Distinction

FeatureFearAnxiety
NaturePhasic, stimulus-bound, time-limitedSustained, diffuse, anticipatory
TriggerSpecific, identifiable threat (present)Non-specific; future-oriented; uncertain
Temporal profileSeconds to minutes; rapid onset and offsetMinutes to hours; chronic background
Primary brain structureAmygdala (central nucleus)BNST (bed nucleus of stria terminalis)
NeuromodulatorsNE (LC), CRFCRF, NPY, GABA, sustained cortisol
Phenomenology"Danger is HERE", fight/flight/freeze"Something bad might happen", vigilance, worry
Evolutionary functionImmediate survival responseSustained preparedness
Disorder correlatesSpecific phobias, PTSD (flashback)GAD, generalised worry component
ExtinctionRelatively faster (direct amygdala conditioning)Slower (BNST circuits; top-down regulation required)
ExampleSeeing a snake immediate fearWaiting for exam results chronic worry
Pharmacological targetBZDs (acute); NE blockersSSRIs/SNRIs (chronic); buspirone; pregabalin
Exam Pearl

Fear = amygdala-driven, immediate, stimulus-specific. Anxiety = BNST-driven, sustained, diffuse. This distinction explains why GAD (anxiety) is harder to treat than specific phobia (fear): BNST circuits are less accessible to simple extinction than amygdala circuits.


Table 7: OCD vs Delusional Disorder (Somatic Type): Overvalued Ideas Spectrum

FeatureOCD (Poor/Absent Insight)Delusional Disorder (Somatic)BDD (Delusional)
DSM-5 classificationOCD chapter (with absent insight specifier)Schizophrenia spectrumOCD chapter (with absent insight specifier)
Belief about symptomsSpectrum: knows probably untrue completely convincedFixed, unshakeable false beliefSpectrum: may be delusional
Ego-syntonic/dystonicDystonic (even with poor insight, some distress)SyntonicMixed
InsightVarying, unique specifierNone, by definitionUnique specifier
Response to SSRIsYes, even with delusional intensity OCDNo, antipsychotics neededYes, SSRIs even with delusional intensity
Response to antipsychoticsAugmentation only (not alone)Primary treatmentAugmentation only
Hallucinations/formal thought disorderNoNo (circumscribed delusion)No
FunctioningImpaired by OCDOften surprisingly intactImpaired by preoccupation
Overvalued ideaIntermediate between obsession and delusionTrue delusionCan be overvalued or delusional
Clinical implicationTreat with SSRIs + ERP regardless of insight levelAntipsychotics first; SSRIs add-onSSRIs first, regardless of insight
Exam Pearl

The critical clinical point: BDD and OCD with delusional features should STILL be treated with SSRIs first, NOT antipsychotics alone. Antipsychotics are augmentation, not primary treatment. Delusional Disorder (somatic) requires antipsychotics as primary treatment, this is the key differential.


Table 8: Flooding vs Systematic Desensitisation

FeatureFlooding (Implosion)Systematic Desensitisation
OriginatorStampfl (implosion); Marks (flooding)Joseph Wolpe (1958)
Theoretical basisExtinction via prolonged, maximal exposureReciprocal inhibition (relaxation inhibits anxiety)
Anxiety inductionMaximum, begin at TOP of hierarchyGraduated, begin at BOTTOM of hierarchy
Relaxation componentNo, deliberately NOT paired with relaxationYes, paired with PMR or other relaxation
Exposure typeProlonged, intensive, maximal SUDSGradual, titrated to tolerance
In vivo vs imaginalBoth (in vivo most effective)Both (in vivo more effective)
Session durationLong (hours if needed) until anxiety extinguishesShorter sessions; stop when relaxed at each step
Patient experienceVery distressing initially; then anxiety dropsTolerable throughout
EfficiencyFaster (fewer sessions)Slower (more sessions needed)
Dropout riskHigherLower
ContraindicationsSevere cardiac/respiratory disease, psychosis, trauma history, low distress toleranceFewer contraindications
Best forSimple phobias (in controlled settings); OCD (intensive ERP is flooding variant)Specific phobias, mild-moderate anxiety
ERP relationshipERP in OCD is essentially prolonged flooding with response preventionNot standard for OCD
Efficacy evidenceHighly effective; faster than gradualHighly effective; better tolerated
Exam Pearl

Wolpe's systematic desensitisation = GRADUAL + RELAXATION. Flooding = MAXIMAL + NO RELAXATION. Both are effective for phobias but flooding is faster with higher dropout. ERP in OCD combines elements of flooding (prolonged exposure, high initial anxiety) with the critical addition of response prevention.


Table 9: Benzodiazepines: Role Across Anxiety Disorders

DisorderRole of BenzodiazepinesRecommendation
GADShort-term bridging; acute severe symptomsUse sparingly; <4 weeks; avoid as monotherapy
Panic DisorderClonazepam/alprazolam, acute relief; adjunct to SSRISecond-line; high dependence risk
Social AnxietyClonazepam: short-term, performance anxietyAdjunct only; not first-line
Specific PhobiaPRN before unavoidable exposure (flight)Avoid, may interfere with extinction learning
OCDClonazepam: adjunct for anxiety reductionLimited role; does not treat OCD core
PTSDCONTRAINDICATEDNo evidence; worsens long-term outcome; interference with extinction; dependence risk
Adjustment DisorderShort-term anxiety/insomnia reliefBrief course acceptable
ASDNot recommendedMay prevent natural recovery
Exam Pearl

BZDs are explicitly CONTRAINDICATED in PTSD. They are NOT first-line for any anxiety disorder. They are best understood as short-term bridges or acute relief agents while waiting for SSRIs to work. Remember: BZDs impair extinction learning (state-dependent learning), this is the pharmacological reason to avoid them during exposure therapy.


Table 10: Pharmacotherapy Comparison Across Anxiety Disorders: At a Glance

DrugGADPanicSADOCDPTSDNotes
Escitalopram✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓Best tolerated SSRI
Sertraline✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓ FDABroadest FDA approvals
Paroxetine✓✓ FDA✓✓ FDA✓✓ FDA✓✓✓✓ FDADiscontinuation syndrome risk
Fluoxetine✓✓✓✓ FDALong half-life (safer discontinuation)
Fluvoxamine✓✓ FDAOCD, first SSRI approved (1994)
Venlafaxine XR✓✓ FDA✓✓ FDA✓✓ FDA✓✓SNRI; strong evidence
Duloxetine✓✓ FDAHelpful with somatic symptoms
Buspirone✓✓No acute effect; no dependence
Pregabalin✓✓Fast onset; EMA approved
Clomipramine✓✓Most efficacious for OCD
Prazosin✓✓ (nightmares)Alpha-1; nightmares specifically
Propranolol✓ (performance)Performance anxiety only; not generalised
Phenelzine✓✓ (severe)MAOI; highly effective; dietary restrictions
Key: ✓✓ = strong evidence / FDA approved✓ = moderate evidence= not standard

Comparisons file compiled for PG exams MD Psychiatry exit examination. Sources: Kaplan & Sadock (10th ed.), Stahl's Essential Psychopharmacology (4th ed.), Oxford Textbook of Psychiatry, DSM-5-TR, ICD-11, NICE Guidelines.

Chapter 05

PYQ Frequency Analysis

Scope: PG exams MD Psychiatry Paper II, compiled from available question bank data (17+ years). Frequency ratings reflect estimated appearance across exam cycles. Use this to prioritise revision time.


SECTION 1: FREQUENCY HEAT MAP

Overall Topic Frequency (Anxiety & OCD)

TopicEstimated FrequencyPriority
OCD, Management (full)Very High (appears nearly every cycle)MUST MASTER
OCD, Neurobiology (CSTC)HighMUST MASTER
PTSD, Evidence-based treatmentHighMUST MASTER
Panic Disorder, CBT / Clark's modelHighMUST MASTER
Y-BOCS, Structure and utilityHighMUST MASTER
GAD, PharmacotherapyModerate-HighCORE
SSRIs vs Clomipramine in OCDModerate-HighCORE
Treatment-resistant OCDModerateCORE
Neurobiology of anxietyModerateCORE
EMDRModerateCORE
BDD, Clinical features and managementModerateCORE
Systematic desensitisation vs floodingModerateCORE
Social Anxiety DisorderLow-ModerateIMPORTANT
Hoarding DisorderLow-ModerateIMPORTANT
AgoraphobiaLow-ModerateIMPORTANT
Adjustment DisorderLowSUPPLEMENTARY
Specific PhobiasLowSUPPLEMENTARY
Trichotillomania / ExcoriationLowSUPPLEMENTARY
Separation Anxiety (adults)Very LowAWARENESS
Substance-induced anxietyVery LowAWARENESS

SECTION 2: QUESTION-TYPE ANALYSIS

Long Essay (10 marks): High Frequency Topics

RankQuestion PatternFrequency
1"Discuss the management of OCD"★★★★★
2"Describe PTSD, clinical features and management"★★★★★
3"Discuss the pharmacotherapy of OCD / Compare SSRIs and clomipramine in OCD"★★★★
4"Describe the neurobiology of anxiety / anxiety disorders"★★★★
5"Discuss panic disorder, cognitive model and management"★★★★
6"Describe GAD, diagnosis and management"★★★
7"Discuss treatment-resistant OCD"★★★
8"Describe EMDR, mechanism and evidence in PTSD"★★★
9"Discuss Body Dysmorphic Disorder"★★★
10"Describe Y-BOCS, structure and use"★★★

Short Essay / Short Notes (5 marks): High Frequency

RankTopicFrequency
1Y-BOCS★★★★★
2Exposure and Response Prevention (ERP)★★★★★
3Clark's cognitive model of panic★★★★
4EMDR★★★★
5Systematic desensitisation★★★★
6Neurobiology of OCD (CSTC circuit)★★★★
7Prazosin in PTSD★★★
8DBS in OCD★★★
9Hoarding Disorder★★★
10Clomipramine in OCD★★★
11Social Anxiety Disorder★★★
12Flooding vs systematic desensitisation★★★
13BDD★★★
14Suffocation alarm theory★★
15Cognitive Processing Therapy (CPT)★★
16Trichotillomania★★
17Locus coeruleus and panic★★
18Agoraphobia★★
19Adjustment Disorder★★
20Virtual Reality Exposure Therapy

SECTION 3: TOPIC-BY-TOPIC PYQ BREAKDOWN

OCD: Most Tested Topic in This Chapter

Long essay patterns observed:

Short note patterns:

Exam Strategy

OCD management is the single most reliably examined topic in Paper II anxiety/OCD section. Write a structured algorithm answer: Assessment (Y-BOCS) First-line SSRI Clomipramine Augmentation ERP Intensive ERP Neuromodulation. Never write a list, write a STEPPED ALGORITHM.


PTSD: Second Most Tested

Long essay patterns:

Short note patterns:

Exam Strategy

PTSD questions frequently ask for BOTH pharmacotherapy AND psychotherapy. Know: sertraline + paroxetine (FDA approved); venlafaxine; prazosin (nightmares). Psychotherapy: PE, CPT, CT-PTSD, EMDR. Always state what NOT to do, BZDs contraindicated, CISD harmful.


Panic Disorder

Long essay patterns:

Short note patterns:

Exam Strategy

Clark's model is a perennial favourite. Draw the cycle diagram: Trigger Perceived threat Apprehension Bodily sensations Catastrophic misinterpretation back to perceived threat. Then map model components to treatment techniques. Examiners reward model-informed treatment descriptions.


GAD

Long essay patterns:

Short note patterns:

Exam Strategy

GAD pharmacotherapy: emphasise the stepped algorithm. Know buspirone limitations (no prior BZD use; 2–4 week onset) and pregabalin advantages (faster onset, EMA approved). Always mention CBT as equally effective.


Neurobiology of Anxiety

Patterns observed:

Key content tested:

Exam Strategy

This is a high-scoring question if you can draw circuits. Structure: brain structures (amygdala, PFC, BNST, LC, hippocampus) neurotransmitters (GABA, 5-HT, NE, glutamate) HPA axis disorder-specific circuits (CSTC for OCD). Use a summary table at the end.


Systematic Desensitisation / Behaviour Therapy

Patterns observed:

Exam Strategy

Wolpe's systematic desensitisation: 3 components (relaxation training + hierarchy construction + graded pairing). Reciprocal inhibition is the theoretical basis. Flooding: maximal exposure without relaxation; faster but higher dropout. Always note BII phobia exception (applied tension technique, NOT relaxation).


SECTION 4: PREDICTED HIGH-YIELD QUESTIONS (Sep 2026 Exit Exam)

Based on frequency analysis and recency patterns, the following are highest-probability questions:

Tier 1: Almost Certain to Appear (in some form)

  1. OCD management (full algorithm or treatment-resistant focus)
  2. PTSD, evidence-based treatments OR EMDR specifically
  3. Y-BOCS, structure, scoring, clinical use
  4. Neurobiology of anxiety / OCD neurocircuitry (CSTC)
  5. Clark's cognitive model of panic + therapeutic implications

Tier 2: Very Likely

  1. Clomipramine vs SSRIs in OCD
  2. GAD pharmacotherapy
  3. BDD, clinical features and management
  4. Exposure and Response Prevention, principles and procedure
  5. Systematic desensitisation (short note)

Tier 3: Probable

  1. DBS in OCD (short note or part of treatment-resistant OCD)
  2. Prazosin in PTSD nightmares
  3. Hoarding Disorder (short note)
  4. Prolonged Exposure therapy / CPT
  5. Ehlers & Clark cognitive model of PTSD

Tier 4: Possible

  1. Social Anxiety Disorder
  2. Flooding vs systematic desensitisation
  3. Agoraphobia
  4. Suffocation alarm theory
  5. VRET

SECTION 5: COMMON EXAMINER TRAPS & FREQUENTLY MISSED POINTS

TopicCommon MistakeCorrect Answer
OCD diagnosis vs OCPDConfusing ego-syntonic (OCPD) with ego-dystonic (OCD)OCD = ego-dystonic; OCPD = ego-syntonic
OCD moved in DSM-5Saying OCD is in Anxiety DisordersOCD has its own chapter in DSM-5 AND ICD-11
First SSRI approved for OCDNot knowing whichFluvoxamine (1994), first FDA approval
Y-BOCS resistance itemSaying high score = more resistanceLow score = more resistance (item is reverse direction)
Clomipramine vs SSRIsSaying SSRIs are more efficaciousClomipramine has HIGHER effect size; SSRIs are preferred for TOLERABILITY
PTSD and benzodiazepinesRecommending BZDs for PTSDContraindicated, no evidence; worsens outcome
ASD vs PTSD durationMixing upASD: 3 days–1 month; PTSD: >1 month
BDD and antipsychoticsSaying pimozide is first-lineSSRIs first-line even with delusional BDD; pimozide NOT recommended
Hoarding and ERPApplying standard OCD ERPHoarding needs CBT-H (different model); ERP less effective
DBS in OCDSaying it has full FDA approvalFDA Humanitarian Device Exemption (2009) only, NOT full approval
Panic attack symptoms countSaying 4 symptoms = diagnosis4 symptoms = ONE panic attack (not a disorder); disorder needs recurrence + 1-month persistence
Flooding and relaxationIncluding relaxation in floodingFlooding deliberately EXCLUDES relaxation (contrast to systematic desensitisation)
BII phobia treatmentUsing standard relaxationApplied tension technique (raise BP); relaxation is CONTRAINDICATED in BII
EMDR eye movementsSaying they are non-specificDebated; meta-analyses suggest bilateral stimulation adds effect beyond exposure alone
Complex PTSDSaying it's in DSM-5Complex PTSD is in ICD-11 ONLY, not DSM-5

SECTION 6: MARKS ALLOCATION STRATEGY

10-Mark Long Essay: Time Budget (30 minutes)

ComponentTimeExpected Content
Introduction (definition, prevalence)2 min3–4 lines
Assessment / diagnostic criteria3 minKey criteria, rating scale
Pharmacotherapy (stepped algorithm)10 minFirst-line, second-line, augmentation, doses
Psychotherapy8 minNamed technique, mechanism, components
Special considerations / refractory5 minNeuromodulation if relevant
Conclusion2 min2–3 lines
Exam Strategy

Draw a management algorithm/flowchart in the answer, examiners reward visual organisation. It also helps structure your thoughts and covers more ground faster than prose.

5-Mark Short Essay: Time Budget (10–12 minutes)

Component · Expected Content
Definition / introduction 2–3 lines
Core content (2–3 structured paragraphs or a table) Main body
Clinical significance / applications 1–2 lines
Exam Strategy

Use a TABLE wherever possible for 5-mark answers. A well-constructed table with 5–6 rows covering key dimensions (definition, mechanism, procedure, evidence, limitations) can earn full marks faster than prose.


SECTION 7: INTER-TOPIC LINKAGES (Exam Connections)

These topics frequently appear together or reference each other:

If asked about... · Also mention / connect to...
OCD management Y-BOCS (assessment), ERP (psychotherapy), CSTC (neurobiology), DBS (refractory)
PTSD treatment EMDR, PE, CPT, Ehlers & Clark model, prazosin (nightmares), no BZDs
Clark's panic model Interoceptive exposure, safety behaviours, anticipatory anxiety
Neurobiology of anxiety CSTC (OCD), BNST (GAD), LC (panic), amygdala (all), vmPFC (PTSD)
Clomipramine in OCD CAST-OQ side effects, QTc monitoring, IV formulation for resistant OCD
Systematic desensitisation Wolpe, reciprocal inhibition, SUDS hierarchy, compare with flooding
BDD OCD spectrum, high suicide risk, no cosmetic procedures, SSRIs regardless of insight
Hoarding Not OCD (different neurobiology), CBT-H not ERP, SSRIs less effective

PYQ Analysis compiled for PG exams MD Psychiatry exit examination (September 2026). Frequency estimates based on 17+ years of available question bank data. All predictions are probabilistic, not guaranteed.

Chapter 06

Quick Review

Instructions: Read each vignette carefully. Answer all three questions before checking the answers. Focus on: diagnosis management algorithm specific clinical reasoning. All patient names are fictitious.


VIGNETTE 1: OCD with Poor Insight

Clinical presentation:

Arjun, 28-year-old male software engineer, is brought by his wife to the outpatient clinic. She reports that for the past 2 years, he spends 4–5 hours daily washing his hands, sometimes until they bleed. He believes that unless he washes 27 times in a specific sequence, his mother will develop cancer. When his wife tries to interrupt the ritual, he becomes extremely distressed. When asked about this in clinic, Arjun states: "I know it sounds strange, but I am 80–90% sure that my rituals protect my mother. I'm not ready to stop." He has stopped attending social events and was recently placed on probation at work due to lateness.

His MSE: alert, oriented; affect anxious; thought content, ideas of reference to cleansing rituals; no hallucinations; insight: partial, acknowledges beliefs "may seem strange" but maintains strong conviction in their protective function. He is not actively suicidal.


Q1. What is the diagnosis? Identify the key diagnostic features and insight specifier. [3 marks]

Key Insight

Answer: Diagnosis: Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD), with poor insight specifier Key diagnostic features (DSM-5): - Obsessions: Recurrent intrusive thought that unless he performs rituals in a specific way, his mother will get cancer, causing marked distress - Compulsions: Repetitive handwashing (27 times in specific sequence), driven by the obsession; excessive and not realistically connected to preventing cancer - Time-consuming: >1 hour/day (4–5 hours), significantly exceeds the 1-hour threshold - Significant impairment: Occupational (probation at work) and social (avoidance of events) - Not substance/medical Insight specifier: Poor insight, Arjun believes his rituals are "80–90% likely" to be true; he acknowledges they "sound strange" (not completely absent insight) but maintains strong conviction. This places him in the poor insight category (not absent/delusional, as he retains some doubt). Differential to exclude: Delusional disorder (somatic), the key difference is that OCD with poor insight still responds to SSRIs, whereas delusional disorder primarily requires antipsychotics. Also, Arjun has the classic OCD structure (obsession compulsion cycle), not an isolated fixed delusion.


Q2. How does poor insight affect management? Outline the treatment plan. [4 marks]

Key Insight

Answer: Impact of poor insight on management: Poor insight in OCD does NOT change the pharmacological approach, SSRIs remain first-line regardless of insight level. However, it significantly impacts: - Engagement with ERP: Patients with poor insight have lower ERP engagement because they do not fully believe rituals are irrational. Motivation enhancement (MI) is essential before ERP. - Risk of treatment refusal: Arjun may refuse ERP if he believes stopping rituals will harm his mother. - Prognosis: Poor insight predicts poorer treatment response and higher relapse risk. Treatment plan: Step 1, Assessment: - Y-BOCS (estimate: score ~28–32, severe range based on time, distress, interference) - Medical history, ECG baseline before clomipramine if needed - Functional assessment (work, social) Step 2, Pharmacotherapy: - Start SSRI at low dose, titrate to high end: - Fluoxetine 60–80 mg/day OR Sertraline 150–200 mg/day - Trial: minimum 10–12 weeks at therapeutic dose - Counsel regarding: 2–4 week onset, initial possible activation, need for long-term treatment Step 3, Psychotherapy: - Begin with Motivational Interviewing (MI), resolve ambivalence about treatment - Inference-based CBT (I-CBT): Specifically designed for poor-insight OCD; targets "inferential confusion" without requiring patient to acknowledge irrationality - Transition to standard ERP once some engagement established - Family psychoeducation (wife): reduce accommodation; guide her away from reassurance-giving Step 4, If inadequate response: - Augment with risperidone 0.5–1 mg/day or aripiprazole 10 mg/day - Consider clomipramine Goal: Even with poor insight, 50–60% of patients respond to SSRIs + ERP.


Q3. Arjun's wife asks: "Should we just do what he wants and let him wash, it calms him down?" How do you counsel her? [3 marks]

Key Insight

Answer: This behaviour is called accommodation, family members reducing their own distress by facilitating the patient's compulsions. While it reduces immediate distress, accommodation: - Maintains the OCD cycle: The compulsion reduces anxiety temporarily reinforces the obsession-compulsion link - Prevents habituation and extinction: Patient never learns that anxiety would subside without the ritual - Increases OCD severity over time, accommodation is associated with poorer treatment outcomes Counselling points for his wife: 1. Arjun's rituals are not voluntary, this is a neurobiological condition requiring treatment, not willpower 2. Her desire to help is understandable, but accommodating the rituals (allowing extra washing, providing reassurance, waiting) actually reinforces OCD 3. Goal: gradually reduce accommodation with support from the treatment team, not abruptly (would create crisis) 4. During ERP, she may be given specific guidance on how to respond (e.g., not providing reassurance but remaining compassionate) 5. Encourage her to join a family psychoeducation group or carer session Practically: "We're not asking you to force him to stop, we're asking you to gradually step back from enabling the rituals. We'll support you both through this."


VIGNETTE 2: Panic Disorder with Agoraphobia

Clinical presentation:

Priya, 32-year-old bank teller, presents with a 6-month history of sudden attacks lasting 10–15 minutes. During these attacks she experiences heart pounding, breathlessness, dizziness, tingling in her hands, and an overwhelming fear that she is having a heart attack. Three cardiac workups (ECG, echo, Holter) were normal. She now refuses to take public transport, avoids shopping malls and cinemas, and travels only when accompanied by her husband. She has taken medical leave for 3 months. She carries her phone and a bottle of water everywhere and always sits near an exit.


Q1. Diagnose and formulate the case using Clark's cognitive model. [4 marks]

Key Insight

Answer: Diagnosis: 1. Panic Disorder (F41.0): Recurrent unexpected panic attacks with persistent concern about future attacks + significant behavioural change (avoidance, safety behaviours) 2. Agoraphobia (F40.00): Fear and avoidance of ≥2 agoraphobic situations (public transport, shopping malls, cinemas) due to concern about escape difficulty if panic occurs The two diagnoses are now separate in DSM-5; both apply here. Clark's Cognitive Model Formulation: Trigger: Entering a shopping mall / boarding bus (internal cues: subtle physical sensations) Perceived threat: "Something is wrong with my heart" Apprehension/anxiety: Attention focuses on chest and breathing Bodily sensations (amplified): Palpitations, dizziness, tingling, breathlessness Catastrophic misinterpretation: "This is a heart attack, I am going to die / collapse" Maintaining factors in Priya's case: - Selective attention: Hypervigilant to bodily sensations at all times - Safety behaviours: Phone, water bottle, sitting near exit, husband as companion, all prevent disconfirmation - Avoidance: Public transport, malls, cinemas, prevent learning that sensations are harmless - Anticipatory anxiety: Dreads going out increased baseline arousal lowers threshold for next attack


Q2. Outline a pharmacological and psychological treatment plan. [4 marks]

Key Insight

Answer: Pharmacotherapy: - Start SSRI at low dose (panic patients are sensitive to initial activation): - Escitalopram 5 mg titrate to 10–20 mg after 2 weeks - OR Sertraline 25 mg 50–200 mg - Explain: "May feel slightly more anxious in first 2 weeks, this is expected and temporary" - Allow 10–12 weeks for full response - If inadequate: switch to venlafaxine XR 75–225 mg - Short-term clonazepam 0.5 mg BD for first 2–4 weeks while waiting for SSRI to work (discuss dependence risk) CBT, Clark's Model-based (12–15 sessions): Phase 1 (Sessions 1–3): Psychoeducation, fight-or-flight response; anxiety is not dangerous; panic attack physiology; Clark's model explained Phase 2 (Sessions 4–6): Cognitive restructuring, identifying catastrophic misinterpretations; alternative explanations ("These are anxiety symptoms, not cardiac symptoms"); probability estimation; reviewing normal cardiac results with her Phase 3 (Sessions 7–10): Interoceptive exposure, deliberately inducing feared sensations: - Running on the spot (palpitations, breathlessness) - Spinning in chair (dizziness) - Breathing through narrow straw (choking) Key: do exercises without safety behaviours; learn sensations are not dangerous Phase 4 (Sessions 10–14): In vivo exposure for agoraphobia, graded hierarchy: - Bus one stop (with then without husband) - Corner shop alone - Shopping centre (quiet time busy time) Drop safety behaviours progressively (phone still present but not checked; then no water bottle) Phase 5 (Sessions 14–15): Relapse prevention Duration of pharmacotherapy: Minimum 12 months after remission.


Q3. What is the role of benzodiazepines in this case? Are there any concerns? [2 marks]

Key Insight

Answer: Limited role: Benzodiazepines (e.g., clonazepam) may be used as a short-term bridge (2–4 weeks) while awaiting SSRI onset. They reduce acute panic attack severity and anticipatory anxiety. Concerns: 1. Dependence and tolerance: With regular use, risk of physical dependence; panic rebounds on discontinuation ("rebound panic") which can be worse than original 2. Cognitive effects: Impair memory and processing, relevant for absorbing CBT lessons 3. Interference with extinction learning: Taking a BZD before exposure = state-dependent learning; anxiety reduction attributed to drug, not coping; undermines CBT gains 4. Alprazolam specifically: Short half-life inter-dose anxiety; more euphorigenic; higher abuse potential. Prefer clonazepam (longer half-life, less abuse potential) Conclusion: Short-term bridge acceptable; avoid long-term use; taper before commencing in vivo exposure work.


VIGNETTE 3: PTSD: Complex Presentation

Clinical presentation:

Meena, 38-year-old nurse, was sexually assaulted by a colleague 8 months ago. She did not report the incident. Over the past 6 months she has had recurrent vivid nightmares of the assault, waking 3–4 times per week. During the day she experiences intrusive images when she passes the ward where it happened. She avoids that ward entirely (has requested a transfer), avoids male colleagues, and no longer meets friends. She feels "numb" most of the time, cannot feel joy, and believes "I should have fought back, it's my fault." She is hypervigilant at work and startles easily. She reports poor concentration and has made three medication errors in the past month. She denies suicidal ideation but says "I don't care if I live or die." She drinks 2–3 units of alcohol nightly to help sleep.


Q1. Diagnose fully. Are there any comorbidities to screen for? [3 marks]

Key Insight

Answer: Primary diagnosis: PTSD (F43.10), DSM-5 criteria met: - Criterion A: Direct experience of sexual assault (actual sexual violence) - Criterion B (Intrusion ≥1): Nightmares (B2), intrusive images when passing the ward (B1), likely physiological reactivity to cues (B5) - Criterion C (Avoidance ≥1): Avoids the ward (C2); avoids male colleagues (C2); likely avoids thoughts about assault (C1) - Criterion D (Negative cognitions ≥2): Self-blame ("it's my fault", D3), persistent negative emotion/shame (D4), emotional numbing/anhedonia (D7), detachment from others (D6) - Criterion E (Arousal ≥2): Hypervigilance (E3), exaggerated startle (E4), concentration problems (E5), sleep disturbance (E6) - Duration: ≥6 months (≥1 month required) ✓ - Impairment: Occupational (medication errors), social, relational Comorbidities to screen: 1. Major Depressive Episode, anhedonia, numbing, passive suicidal ideation ("don't care if I live or die"), social withdrawal; PHQ-9 2. Alcohol Use Disorder, 2–3 units nightly; assess for dependence (CAGE-AID, AUDIT); drinking to sleep = harmful use at minimum; PTSD + alcohol use disorder is a common and dangerous combination 3. Suicidal ideation, "I don't care if I live or die" = passive suicidal ideation; requires formal risk assessment (C-SSRS) 4. Complex PTSD (ICD-11), self-blame, shame, interpersonal withdrawal, emotional dysregulation features suggest possible CPTSD; assess disturbances in self-organisation (DSO)


Q2. Outline a comprehensive management plan, including safety, pharmacotherapy, and psychotherapy. [5 marks]

Key Insight

Answer: Immediate safety: - Risk assessment: passive suicidal ideation present, "don't care if I live or die" requires structured assessment (C-SSRS); low active ideation currently but high-risk profile (trauma, alcohol, depression) - Safety plan: emergency contacts, reasons for living, means restriction - Occupational safety: medication errors, inform supervisor; temporary supervised practice or duties modification until stable Address alcohol use first: - AUDIT-C and dependence assessment - Brief motivational intervention - If dependent: supervised alcohol detoxification before commencing trauma-focused therapy (TF-CBT contraindicated in active heavy alcohol use) - Naltrexone or acamprosate for alcohol relapse prevention Pharmacotherapy for PTSD: - Sertraline 50 mg 200 mg (FDA-approved; first-line) - Address nightmares: Prazosin 1–5 mg at night (alpha-1 antagonist; Raskind trials; reduces nightmare frequency/intensity and sleep disruption) - If comorbid MDD confirmed: sertraline addresses both - Avoid benzodiazepines (PTSD contraindication; additional risk given alcohol use) Psychotherapy: - Phase-based approach recommended given complexity (Complex PTSD features, active alcohol use): Phase 1, Stabilisation (4–6 weeks): - Psychoeducation about PTSD, trauma responses, alcohol-trauma link - Safety and crisis skills - Sleep hygiene, grounding techniques (5-4-3-2-1, safe place imagery) - Distress tolerance (DBT skills if indicated) Phase 2, Trauma Processing (12–16 sessions after stabilisation): - Choose from: CPT (ideal for self-blame/guilt), PE (prolonged exposure), EMDR - CPT particularly well-suited given prominent self-blame ("it's my fault") and shame, addresses stuck points directly - Address: safety, trust, power/control, esteem, intimacy themes Phase 3, Integration and Reconnection: - Gradual re-engagement with social relationships - Occupational rehabilitation - Relapse prevention Multi-disciplinary involvement: Psychiatry, psychology, occupational health (for nursing duties), social work.


Q3. Meena asks: "Why can't you just give me something to forget it all?" How do you respond, and what does this reflect clinically? [2 marks]

Key Insight

Answer: Clinical reflection: This statement reflects several features: - Desire for avoidance (a core PTSD maintaining factor), wanting to suppress or escape the memory rather than process it - Possible cognitive avoidance, patients often wish for pharmacological erasure rather than engagement with trauma - May also reflect hopelessness (comorbid depression) or misunderstanding of trauma treatment Clinical response: Acknowledge her pain directly: "I hear how exhausted you are, carrying this for 8 months has been incredibly hard." Then explain gently: - "There's no medication that erases memories, and even if there were, the goal isn't to delete what happened, but to change how it lives in you." - "Right now the memory is like an open wound, it keeps getting triggered and bleeding. Treatment is like cleaning and closing the wound properly so it becomes a scar, still there, but no longer raw." - "The therapies we use, like CPT and EMDR, actually do change how the memory feels. Many people say after treatment it feels distant, like something that happened to them rather than something still happening." This response validates, corrects misconception without dismissing her wish, and introduces the rationale for trauma processing.


VIGNETTE 4: GAD: Diagnostic Challenge

Clinical presentation:

Rajan, 45-year-old teacher, presents to a general psychiatry clinic with a 2-year history of "constant worry." He worries about his children's academic performance, his wife's health, his own finances, and his job security, even though objectively there are no major problems in any of these areas. He finds it impossible to stop worrying once it starts. He has muscle aches in his shoulders and neck, wakes at 2 AM and cannot return to sleep, and feels "on edge" throughout the day. He says his mind is "always running." He is exhausted by 3 PM. He denies panic attacks, obsessions, or social fears. He has no medical history. TSH, FBC, renal, and liver function tests, all normal.


Q1. Diagnose and justify. What is the key differential? [3 marks]

Key Insight

Answer: Diagnosis: Generalised Anxiety Disorder (GAD) DSM-5 criteria met: - A: Excessive anxiety/worry about multiple domains (children, wife, finances, job), all for ≥2 years - B: Difficulty controlling the worry (cannot stop it once it starts) - C: ≥3 somatic symptoms present: - Muscle tension (shoulder/neck aches) ✓ - Sleep disturbance (wakes at 2 AM) ✓ - Restlessness ("on edge") ✓ - Fatigue (exhausted by 3 PM) ✓, 4 of 6 symptoms - D: Causes significant distress (subjective suffering) and impairment (fatigue affecting work performance implied) - E & F: Medical causes excluded (TSH normal, hyperthyroidism excluded); no other mental disorder accounts for the picture Key differentials: | Differential | Why excluded here | |-------------|------------------| | Panic Disorder | No discrete panic attacks; no situational avoidance | | Social Anxiety Disorder | Worry is not about social evaluation; no social avoidance | | OCD | No intrusive ego-dystonic obsessions; no compulsions | | MDD with anxiety | No anhedonia, low mood as primary feature described; anxiety predominant | | Hyperthyroidism | TSH normal | | Adjustment Disorder | No identifiable stressor; duration >6 months; worry is multiple/global | Most important differential to exclude medically: Hyperthyroidism (checked, TSH normal). Pheochromocytoma if episodic symptoms (no paroxysmal features here).


Q2. Design a complete treatment plan combining pharmacotherapy and CBT. [4 marks]

Key Insight

Answer: Assessment: - GAD-7: 0–21 scale (likely moderate-severe given sleep, functional impact) - PHQ-9 to rule out comorbid MDD - AUDIT for alcohol (self-medicating anxiety common) Pharmacotherapy: First-line: - Escitalopram 10 mg daily (best tolerated; minimal drug interactions) - Start with 5 mg for first week to reduce activation effects - Review at 4 weeks; titrate to 20 mg if needed - Explain: "Takes 4–6 weeks to feel benefit; don't stop early" - Expected duration: minimum 12 months after remission If inadequate response at 8–10 weeks: - Switch to Venlafaxine XR 75–150 mg (dual action; helpful for muscle aches/fatigue) - OR add buspirone 15–30 mg/day (no dependence; but takes 3–4 weeks; not if previously on BZDs) - OR add pregabalin 150–300 mg/day (faster onset ~1 week; EMA-approved for GAD) Short-term: - Avoid long-term benzodiazepines (teacher, cognitive effects, driving) - Hydroxyzine 25–50 mg PRN for acute anxiety peaks if needed CBT for GAD: Borkovec's Avoidance Model frames treatment: - Worry is a cognitive avoidance strategy that suppresses emotional processing - Goal: Reduce worry as avoidance; increase engagement with feared outcomes Components (12–16 sessions): 1. Psychoeducation: Nature of worry; how GAD develops; rationale for CBT 2. Self-monitoring: Worry diary, identify triggers, domains, automatic thoughts 3. Worry postponement / Stimulus control: Designate one 20-minute "worry time" daily; outside this time, postpone worries to the scheduled slot 4. Cognitive restructuring: Challenge probability overestimation ("How likely is it really that X will happen?"); de-catastrophising ("If the worst happened, could I cope?") 5. Relaxation training: Progressive Muscle Relaxation (PMR), directly targets muscle tension; 20 minutes daily; apps available 6. Behavioural experiments: Test worry predictions over 2 weeks 7. Problem-solving skills: For real, solvable worries (distinguish "solvable problem" from "hypothetical what-if") 8. Sleep hygiene counselling: Address 2 AM awakening; stimulus control for sleep 9. Relapse prevention: Identify early warning signs; plan


Q3. What is Borkovec's avoidance model of worry, and why is it clinically relevant? [3 marks]

Key Insight

Answer: Borkovec's Avoidance Model (1994): Core proposition: Worry is a primarily verbal-linguistic (cognitive) process that functions as avoidance of emotional processing of threatening images and their associated somatic/emotional responses. Mechanism: 1. Threatening image/thought arises (e.g., image of child being hurt) 2. Individual "worries" in words/concepts ("What if he gets hurt at school? What if I didn't pack enough? What would I do?") 3. This linguistic activity suppresses somatic and emotional activation (heart rate, anxiety) that would accompany imaginal processing 4. Because worry "works" to reduce immediate somatic distress, it is negatively reinforced 5. However, the emotional content is never fully processed remains threatening triggers more worry Evidence for the model: - Worriers show less cardiovascular reactivity to stressors than non-worriers (paradoxical dampening) - Imaginal exposure without worry full emotional activation extinction - Verbal worry PREVENTS the emotional processing needed for extinction Clinical relevance: 1. Explains why reassurance doesn't help: It provides temporary relief (like worry) but prevents processing 2. Directs CBT intervention: Focus on facilitating emotional processing (not just thought challenging); imaginal techniques alongside cognitive work 3. Explains metacognitive dimension: Some patients hold positive beliefs about worry ("Worrying helps me prepare"), these must be directly addressed (Wells' metacognitive therapy) 4. Explains why Rajan can't "just relax": Worry is functional, it reduces immediate anxiety. The "cost" is long-term maintenance of GAD.


VIGNETTE 5: Social Anxiety Disorder

Clinical presentation:

Deepa, 26-year-old medical intern, presents with a 10-year history of fear of speaking in public, attending ward rounds, and presenting cases. She becomes intensely anxious when expected to speak in group settings, heart pounding, flushing, voice trembling, sweating, and fears others will notice and think she is incompetent. She over-prepares excessively (4–5 hours for a 5-minute case presentation). She does not fear one-to-one conversations. She has declined a research conference invitation, turned down a teaching post, and avoids socialising with senior colleagues. LSAS total score: 72.


Q1. Diagnose, differentiate performance-only vs generalised SAD, and justify your classification here. [3 marks]

Key Insight

Answer: Diagnosis: Social Anxiety Disorder (SAD), Performance Specifier applicable but possibly generalised (see below) DSM-5 criteria met: - Marked fear/anxiety in social performance situations (ward rounds, case presentations, conferences) - Fear of negative evaluation (appearing incompetent/nervous to others) - Situations almost always provoke anxiety - Avoided (conference, teaching post) or endured with distress (case presentations) - Disproportionate to actual threat - Duration: 10 years (>>6 months) - Significant occupational impairment (declined career opportunities) Performance-only vs Generalised SAD: | Feature | Performance-only | Generalised | |---------|-----------------|-------------| | Fear domain | Public speaking/performing only | Most social situations | | One-to-one fear | No | Yes | | LSAS score | <55 typically | Higher scores | | Prognosis | Better | More chronic | Classification of Deepa: - She fears performance/group settings but not one-to-one could be performance-only - However, she avoids socialising with senior colleagues (social interaction, not just performance) and LSAS = 72 (marked SAD range) - Most accurate classification: Generalised SAD, the avoidance extends beyond formal performance to informal social interactions with perceived-status others - The performance-only specifier applies ONLY when fear is STRICTLY limited to public speaking/performing, Deepa's avoidance is broader


Q2. Outline the pharmacological and psychological management. [4 marks]

Key Insight

Answer: Pharmacotherapy: First-line: - Sertraline 50–200 mg (FDA-approved for SAD; start 25 mg × 2 weeks) - Paroxetine CR 12.5–37.5 mg (FDA-approved; more sedating, may be helpful for evening anxiety) - Venlafaxine XR 75–225 mg (FDA-approved) - Duration: minimum 12 months; many require ongoing treatment For acute performance anxiety (as an adjunct): - Propranolol 10–40 mg taken 30–60 minutes before specific performance situations - Reduces peripheral symptoms (heart pounding, voice trembling, visible flushing) - Does NOT reduce cognitive anxiety or fear; works for somatic symptoms - Not for generalised SAD, not effective for overall disorder Second-line (severe/refractory): - Phenelzine 45–90 mg (MAOI), highly effective; dietary tyramine restrictions required; orthostatic hypotension - Gabapentin 900–3600 mg, useful if comorbid alcohol history Psychotherapy, CBT (Clark & Wells model): Phase 1: Develop shared formulation, self-focused attention, safety behaviours (over-preparation, minimal eye contact) maintain the disorder Phase 2: Attentional retraining, shift focus from internal monitoring (how am I coming across?) to external (what is being said; the environment); attention training exercises Phase 3: Video feedback, record Deepa giving a case presentation; review together to demonstrate discrepancy between subjective experience (terrible) and objective appearance (competent); powerful disconfirmation Phase 4: Drop safety behaviours, target over-preparation specifically; behavioural experiments (give presentations with less preparation; observe outcome) Phase 5: Graded social exposure, hierarchy: - Ask a question in ward round - Present a case with 1 hour prep only - Attend department social event - Accept conference presentation Phase 6: Relapse prevention


Q3. Deepa asks: "Propranolol, can I just take it before every presentation forever?" Advise her. [3 marks]

Key Insight

Answer: Propranolol is not a long-term solution for Social Anxiety Disorder. Here is why: What propranolol does: - Blocks peripheral beta-adrenergic receptors reduces palpitations, sweating, visible tremor, voice shake - Provides temporary symptomatic relief for acute performance situations Why it cannot be a long-term solution: 1. Does not treat the underlying disorder: Propranolol reduces somatic symptoms but does NOT change cognitive anxiety, negative self-evaluative beliefs, or avoidance. SAD persists untreated. 2. Becomes a safety behaviour: Relying on propranolol before presentations means Deepa never learns that she CAN manage without it, she attributes success to the drug, not herself. This maintains anxiety. 3. Does not generalise: Informal social situations (lunch with senior colleagues) cannot all be pre-medicated; these remain distressing. 4. Tolerability concerns: Not suitable if bradycardia, asthma, diabetes, or Raynaud's; fatigue with regular use. Appropriate advice: "Propranolol is a reasonable bridge for very specific unavoidable performances while we work on the real problem. But the goal is to get to a point where you don't need it, where you've learned through experience that your anxiety is manageable and people aren't judging you the way you fear. CBT and an SSRI will get you there."


VIGNETTE 6: BDD: Cosmetic Surgery Clinic Referral

Clinical presentation:

Vikram, 24-year-old male, is referred from a plastic surgery clinic. He has requested rhinoplasty three times in 18 months. The first surgeon performed the procedure, and Vikram was distressed with the result within 4 weeks ("it's still crooked"). A second and third surgeon declined, noting that his nose appeared normal. He currently spends 3–4 hours daily examining his nose in mirrors from different angles, comparing photographs, and seeking reassurance from family. He has dropped out of college and does not leave home. PHQ-9 = 19 (severe depression). On questioning, he rates his conviction that his nose is disfigured at "99%." He denies suicidal ideation currently but mentions he "understands why people with this feeling might not want to live."


Q1. Diagnose, classify insight level, and assess risk. [3 marks]

Key Insight

Answer: Diagnosis: Body Dysmorphic Disorder (BDD), F45.22 - Preoccupation with perceived defect (nasal appearance) unnoticeable to others - Repetitive behaviours: mirror checking, photography comparison, reassurance-seeking (≥3 hours daily) - Significant distress and impairment (dropped out of college; housebound) - Not better explained by eating disorder or another condition Insight specifier: Absent insight / delusional beliefs, conviction at "99%", he is essentially certain the defect exists despite objective evidence to the contrary (two surgeons refusing; photographs not confirming defect). In DSM-5, this is captured by the "with absent insight/delusional beliefs" specifier. Previously this would have been classified as "Delusional Disorder, Somatic Type", DSM-5 now places it within the BDD spectrum. Risk assessment: - HIGH suicide risk - PHQ-9 = 19 (severe depressive episode comorbid) - "Understands why people with this feeling might not want to live" = passive suicidal ideation / implicit suicidal communication, requires formal structured assessment (C-SSRS) - BDD-specific risk factors: delusional insight, comorbid MDD, prior cosmetic procedure disappointment (all present) - Lifetime suicide attempt rate in BDD ~25%; suicidal ideation ~80% - Risk level: HIGH, requires active safety planning and possible inpatient admission if ideation escalates


Q2. What is your management plan? Address the surgical requests specifically. [4 marks]

Key Insight

Answer: Immediate: - Formal suicide risk assessment (C-SSRS) - Safety plan: emergency contacts, coping strategies, means restriction - Consider inpatient admission if active suicidal ideation emerges - Coordinate with plastic surgeons, advise AGAINST further surgery (document recommendation) Addressing surgical requests: - Cosmetic procedures are contraindicated in BDD: - >80% of patients remain preoccupied or shift focus to a new perceived defect post-procedure - Surgery reinforces the belief that the defect is real and fixable - BDD severity often worsens following procedures - Explain to Vikram: "The surgery you had didn't bring relief, this tells us the problem is not with your nose. It's in how your mind processes what it sees. Treating your mind will do what surgery cannot." Pharmacotherapy: - Fluoxetine 60–80 mg/day (best evidence for BDD; also treats comorbid MDD) - Alternative: fluvoxamine 200–300 mg/day; sertraline 150–200 mg/day - High doses required, same principle as OCD - Trial: 12 weeks minimum at therapeutic dose - SSRIs effective REGARDLESS of insight level, do not withhold because he has delusional intensity - Do NOT use antipsychotics alone (unlike true delusional disorder) - Consider antipsychotic AUGMENTATION (risperidone 0.5–1 mg) given delusional intensity and partial response to SSRI Psychotherapy, CBT for BDD (Veale protocol): - Motivational enhancement first, delusional insight makes engagement challenging - Attentional retraining: Shift from self-focused (internal nose image) to external (environment, other people's faces) - ERP for checking behaviours: Mirror exposure (holistic, brief; not zoomed/analysed); prevent repeated checking and photography comparison; prevent reassurance-seeking - Cognitive restructuring: Self-as-social-object; appearance assumptions; inferential errors - Behavioural experiments: Go out for short periods; observe that people are not staring Rehabilitation: Academic counselling; gradual return to college (graded exposure)


Q3. How do you explain BDD to Vikram in a way he can accept? [3 marks]

Key Insight

Answer: Vikram believes the problem is his nose, telling him directly "there's nothing wrong with your nose" will likely destroy the therapeutic alliance. Instead, use a validation-first approach: Validate his suffering: "I can see how much distress this has caused you. You've dropped out of college, you can't leave the house. This is real suffering and it deserves real treatment." Create cognitive dissonance gently: "I want to share an observation, and I'd like your reaction. You had surgery, and within 4 weeks, you were distressed again. Two more surgeons have looked carefully and declined. And yet the distress hasn't changed. Does that suggest to you that the surgery might not be the answer?" Introduce the neurobiological frame: "There is a condition, and it's more common than people think, where the brain's visual processing system for self-image becomes dysregulated. It's like a faulty mirror inside the brain. What you see when you look at yourself doesn't match what others see. It's not that you're wrong to believe it, it's that a part of your brain is generating this perception powerfully and incorrectly. We can treat the brain, and when we do, the perception changes." Offer a therapeutic experiment: "I'm not asking you to agree with me today. I'm asking you to try a treatment for 12 weeks. If the distress reduces, whatever the reason, we've helped you. You can decide then what you believe about your nose." This approach: validates, creates doubt without confrontation, externalises (brain, not him), and offers a low-stakes experiment.


VIGNETTE 7: Treatment-Resistant OCD

Clinical presentation:

Sunita, 35-year-old homemaker, has had OCD since age 16. She has checking and contamination obsessions. She has tried fluoxetine (80 mg × 14 weeks, partial response, Y-BOCS reduced from 34 to 27), then sertraline (200 mg × 12 weeks, no further benefit, Y-BOCS 28), then paroxetine (60 mg × 12 weeks, intolerance due to weight gain and sexual dysfunction, discontinued at 8 weeks). She had 20 sessions of ERP with a trained psychologist, Y-BOCS reached 24 at end, but has since risen back to 31. She is currently on escitalopram 20 mg. She is severely functionally impaired, cannot cook, manage finances, or leave the house unaccompanied.


Q1. Does Sunita meet criteria for treatment-resistant OCD? Justify. [2 marks]

Key Insight

Answer: Yes, Sunita meets criteria for treatment-resistant OCD. Treatment-resistant OCD is defined as failure to achieve ≥35% Y-BOCS reduction after adequate trials of ≥2–3 SSRIs at maximum tolerated dose for ≥10–12 weeks AND adequate ERP. Sunita's trial history: | Treatment | Dose | Duration | Outcome | |-----------|------|----------|---------| | Fluoxetine | 80 mg (maximum) | 14 weeks | Partial response only (21% reduction: 3427); not ≥35% | | Sertraline | 200 mg (maximum) | 12 weeks | No benefit (Y-BOCS 28) | | Paroxetine | 60 mg | 8 weeks | Discontinued, intolerance (not adequate duration) | | ERP | 20 sessions | Full course | Response but relapsed (Y-BOCS now 31) | | Escitalopram | 20 mg (subtherapeutic for OCD, should be 40 mg) | Current | Not yet adequate | Assessment: Fluoxetine and sertraline = 2 adequate SSRI failures. ERP = adequate course but relapse. Paroxetine was inadequate (only 8 weeks; not counted). Three SSRIs have been trialled with insufficient overall response. Current escitalopram may be subtherapeutic (20 mg, consider 40 mg). Conclusion: Meets treatment-resistance criteria. Systematic escalation warranted.


Q2. What is the next step? Outline a management plan for treatment-resistant OCD. [5 marks]

Key Insight

Answer: Immediate: Optimise current treatment - Increase escitalopram to 40 mg/day (OCD often needs higher doses than depression; 20 mg is subtherapeutic for OCD at this severity) - Allow 10–12 weeks at 40 mg before declaring failure - Reinstate structured ERP, previous relapse after discontinuation suggests maintenance ERP needed (monthly booster sessions minimum) Step 1: Clomipramine trial - Most efficacious single agent (effect size ~1.0 vs SSRI ~0.5–0.7) - Start 25 mg nocte titrate to 150–250 mg over 4–6 weeks - Baseline ECG and BP monitoring - Counsel re: anticholinergic effects, sedation, sexual dysfunction - Expected trial: 10–12 weeks Step 2: Antipsychotic augmentation (add to SSRI) - Risperidone 0.5–2 mg/day, best RCT evidence; can add to escitalopram - Mechanism: D2 blockade in striatum augments SRI effect on CSTC circuit - Alternative: aripiprazole 10–15 mg (better metabolic profile) - If comorbid anxiety: quetiapine 25–100 mg Step 3: Glutamate modulators - N-Acetylcysteine (NAC) 2400 mg/day, positive RCT data for augmentation; well-tolerated - Memantine 10–20 mg, small studies; NMDA antagonism - Riluzole 50–100 mg, open-label studies; reduces glutamate Step 4: Intensive ERP - Daily ERP sessions for 2–3 weeks (residential or day programme) - For relapsed/severe cases, intensive format outperforms weekly sessions - Family-based ERP: assess and reduce family accommodation Step 5: IV Clomipramine - If oral clomipramine inadequate: IV formulation bypasses first-pass metabolism - Protocol: 25–75 mg in dextrose IV over 45–90 min (specialist centre) Step 6: Neuromodulation - rTMS/dTMS: Deep TMS (Brainsway H7 coil); FDA 510(k) cleared (2018); 20 sessions; ~40% response - Target: supplementary motor area (SMA) or dorsolateral PFC Step 7: Neurosurgical referral (if Y-BOCS remains ≥30 despite all above) - Multidisciplinary assessment (neurosurgery, psychiatry, neurology, psychology, ethics) - Options: DBS (ALIC, reversible; FDA HDE 2009), Gamma Knife capsulotomy, anterior capsulotomy - Full informed consent; documentation of treatment failure


Q3. Sunita's husband asks: "Is there any surgery that can cure her?" How do you counsel him? [3 marks]

Key Insight

Answer: Acknowledge his question and the desperation behind it: "I understand, watching Sunita suffer for nearly 20 years is exhausting for you too, and it's natural to want a definitive fix." What surgery CAN do: - Neurosurgical procedures exist for severe, treatment-resistant OCD: - Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS): Small electrodes implanted in a brain circuit (anterior limb of internal capsule); stimulation is adjustable and reversible; response rate ~40–60% - Gamma Knife: Radiation-based; non-invasive; takes 6–12 months to work; similar response rates - These are NOT cures, they are treatments that REDUCE severity, not eliminate OCD What surgery CANNOT do: - Surgery is NOT a cure, "cure" implies complete resolution; OCD rarely fully resolves even with surgery - Response means ≥35% reduction in Y-BOCS, significant improvement, but residual symptoms remain in most cases - Surgery requires continued pharmacotherapy and ERP post-procedure When surgery becomes an option: - Only after ALL other treatments have been tried adequately - Requires multidisciplinary team approval, ethics review, and Sunita's full informed consent - We are not there yet, there are still steps to try (augmentation, intensive ERP, clomipramine) Closing message: "Surgery is a real option for the most severe cases, and it's on the table. But it's the last step in a long process, and for good reason, it's irreversible (except DBS). Let's try the next steps first. We haven't exhausted all options yet, and each step can make a meaningful difference."


VIGNETTE 8: Specific Phobia: Blood Injection Injury Type

Clinical presentation:

Rahul, 22-year-old medical student, faints when he has blood drawn for his own medical tests. He has also fainted while observing venepuncture procedures in clinical postings and once while suturing a laceration. He dreads clinical postings involving blood or injections, avoids them when possible, and plans to limit his career to "anything without blood." His heart races briefly when he anticipates these situations, but he then feels lightheaded and loses consciousness. He recovers within minutes. He has no cardiac history. ECG is normal.


Q1. Diagnose and explain the unique physiology. [3 marks]

Key Insight

Answer: Diagnosis: Specific Phobia, Blood-Injection-Injury (BII) Type (F40.231) DSM-5 criteria: - Marked fear/anxiety about blood, injections, and injury - Almost always provokes immediate fear response - Actively avoided (clinical postings) - Disproportionate to actual danger - ≥6 months (implied by career-planning avoidance) - Significant impairment (career limitation; medical student, significant professional impact) Unique physiology, Vasovagal (Diphasic) Response: BII phobia is the ONLY phobia type with a characteristic biphasic cardiovascular response: Phase 1, Sympathetic surge (brief): - Heart rate increases (Rahul notices "heart races") - Blood pressure rises - This is the typical sympathetic fight-or-flight response Phase 2, Paradoxical vagal response: - Reflex vagal activation (likely baroreflex or vasovagal reflex triggered by blood pressure peak) - Bradycardia (heart rate drops) + vasodilation hypotension - Cerebral hypoperfusion presyncope/syncope (lightheadedness fainting) This is the OPPOSITE of the standard anxiety response (which maintains or increases BP/HR). This explains why standard relaxation techniques are CONTRAINDICATED in BII phobia, relaxation further lowers sympathetic tone and exacerbates hypotension.


Q2. What is the specific treatment? Why is it different from other phobias? [4 marks]

Key Insight

Answer: First-line treatment: Applied Tension Technique (Ost & Sterner, 1987) Rationale: In BII phobia, the therapeutic goal is NOT to relax, it is to MAINTAIN or RAISE blood pressure to prevent the vasovagal response. Applied Tension Technique, Steps: 1. Tension exercise: - Tense major muscle groups simultaneously (arms, legs, abdomen, chest) - Hold for 10–15 seconds until warmth felt in face (indicates rising BP) - Release tension for 20–30 seconds - Repeat 5 times - Practise 3–5 times daily for 1–2 weeks before commencing exposure 2. During exposure: - Apply tension at onset of any lightheadedness - Maintains cerebral perfusion; prevents syncope - Patient learns to tolerate the stimulus while maintaining consciousness 3. Graded exposure (blood/injury hierarchy): - Step 1: Read about blood draws - Step 2: Watch videos of blood draws - Step 3: Be in same room as blood tube - Step 4: Observe venepuncture from distance - Step 5: Observe close up - Step 6: Have blood drawn himself (with applied tension) - Step 7: Perform venepuncture on patient Why different from other phobias: - Standard relaxation training (PMR, diaphragmatic breathing) further lowers BP INCREASES fainting risk - Standard gradual relaxation paired with exposure is contraindicated - Instead: maintain high physiological tone during exposure; teach recognition of prodrome Evidence: Applied tension + graded exposure = effective in 80% of BII phobia cases; effect maintained at 1-year follow-up (Ost et al.) Pharmacotherapy: Limited role. No routine pharmacotherapy; beta-blockers actually worsen the vasovagal response (further lower BP/HR). Avoid.


Q3. How does this case affect Rahul's medical career? How would you advise him? [3 marks]

Key Insight

Answer: Impact assessment: - BII phobia with syncope during clinical procedures is a significant occupational impairment for a medical student - However: BII phobia is one of the MOST TREATABLE phobias, 80%+ response to applied tension + exposure in 1–5 intensive sessions - Without treatment, career avoidance will narrow his professional options substantially Clinical advice: Short-term: - Seek treatment NOW, applied tension technique can be learned within 2–4 sessions - The fainting is a conditioned physiological response, NOT a sign of weakness or unsuitability for medicine - Practical adjustment: have a colleague aware during early clinical postings; sit if feeling lightheaded; do not stand for prolonged venepuncture observation until habituated Treatment prognosis: - "With 3–5 sessions of applied tension therapy, most people with your exact problem become fully able to work with blood and injections without fainting. This is not a career-ending condition, it's a treatable one." Career counselling: - Do NOT limit career choices prematurely based on current state - Psychiatry itself involves less blood than surgery/emergency medicine, but treatment should aim for full functional recovery, not just avoidance Realistic framing: - "A month from now, after this treatment, this will likely not be an issue. Don't let one avoidable condition decide your specialty."


Clinical Vignettes compiled for PG exams MD Psychiatry exit examination. All patient details are entirely fictitious. Sources: Kaplan & Sadock (10th ed.), Stahl's Essential Psychopharmacology (4th ed.), Oxford Textbook of Psychiatry, DSM-5-TR, ICD-11, NICE Guidelines.

← All study guides