Aporia 05: NMS, malignant catatonia, serotonin syndrome, and EPS mimics

Aporia · Issue Five
05
Heat
and Iron.
A young man on an antipsychotic and a recently added antidepressant is rigid, febrile, and barely responsive. Four diagnoses fit the same body. Two of the treatments, given to the wrong one, will kill him.
Clinical dilemmas in psychiatry
Dr. Wilfred D'souza
June 2026

01 / AporiaThe same body, four diagnoses, opposite hands

A 24-year-old man with a first episode of psychosis is three weeks into haloperidol, recently raised to 15 mg a day after agitation on the ward. Sertraline was added five days ago for low mood. Last night he stopped drinking. This morning he is mute, staring, holding a posture his hands were placed in. His temperature is 39.4 degrees Celsius, his limbs resist passive movement like bending a lead pipe, his pulse is 130, his blood pressure swings from 150 to 90 over the course of an hour, and he is drenched in sweat. The intern, who has just read about it, says serotonin syndrome and reaches to give cyproheptadine. The registrar says neuroleptic malignant syndrome and reaches to stop the haloperidol. The consultant looks at the posturing and the waxy limbs and asks for a vial of lorazepam. All three are looking at the same patient.

This is the aporia of the fifth issue. Neuroleptic malignant syndrome (NMS), malignant catatonia (MC), serotonin syndrome (SS), and the severe extrapyramidal syndromes (EPS) converge on one final common picture: rigidity, hyperthermia, altered consciousness, and autonomic instability, arising in a patient on psychotropic drugs. They share a population, a tempo, and a set of vital signs. They do not share a treatment. Stopping the antipsychotic rescues the NMS patient and is irrelevant to the serotonin patient. Giving an antipsychotic to sedate an agitated patient can be fatal in malignant catatonia. Giving an anticholinergic for presumed EPS does nothing for serotonin toxicity and worsens the hyperthermia. The diagnostic question is not academic. It selects the hand that helps from the hand that harms.

This issue walks the four-way differential from the vocabulary of rigidity and heat, through each syndrome in full, into the reasons they are confused, then to the discriminators that separate them at the bedside and in the laboratory, the bedside tools that resolve ambiguity (the lorazepam challenge above all), the mimics that are not psychiatric at all, and finally management in depth, syndrome by syndrome, including the honest algorithm for the patient you genuinely cannot classify yet. The reference list anchors every clinical claim to the canon and to the 2021 to 2025 literature, with India-specific data on drug availability where it changes what you can actually do.

What this issue covers

Four life-threatening hyperthermic-rigid syndromes, described in full, then separated. The structure is: definitions first, the four syndromes second (NMS, malignant catatonia, serotonin syndrome, the extrapyramidal family), the overlap that confuses them third, the discriminators and bedside tools fourth, the non-psychiatric mimics fifth, management by syndrome sixth, and the Indian frame of drug access and the law seventh. The piece closes by resolving the patient in the lede. Fourteen chapters. The evidence base is the British Association for Psychopharmacology 2023 catatonia consensus, the international NMS consensus criteria, the Hunter serotonin toxicity criteria, and recent reviews and case series current to 2025.

Why this differential matters in Indian practice

Three facts shape this differential in India specifically. First, polypharmacy is the norm, not the exception: a patient may arrive on an antipsychotic, an antidepressant, tramadol from an orthopaedic consult, and an over-the-counter cough syrup containing dextromethorphan, any combination of which can tip into serotonin toxicity or mask the picture. Second, the specific antidote for the most feared of these, intravenous dantrolene for NMS, is effectively unavailable in most Indian hospitals: it is import-dependent, brand-only, expensive, and stocked in a handful of metro centres.22 The management that India can actually deliver leans on what is at hand, which is supportive care, benzodiazepines, bromocriptine tablets, and electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), and India is one of the few places where ECT access for malignant catatonia is a realistic same-week option. Third, the lorazepam challenge, which costs almost nothing and is available everywhere, is the single most useful disambiguating test in this differential, and it is underused.

02 / DefinitionsThe vocabulary of rigidity and heat

The words matter because the type of rigidity and the quality of the fever point toward different diagnoses before any test returns. Rigidity is not one thing. Hyperthermia is not the same as fever. Getting the vocabulary right is the first act of disambiguation.

Lead-pipe rigidity

Uniform resistance to passive movement throughout the range of motion, in both flexor and extensor directions, not velocity-dependent. The hallmark of NMS. It reflects sustained extrapyramidal motor activation from dopamine blockade and is the engine of the heat and the muscle breakdown.

Cogwheel rigidity

Ratchet-like interrupted resistance, lead-pipe rigidity with superimposed tremor. A sign of drug-induced parkinsonism and milder extrapyramidal states.

Clonus and hyperreflexia

Rhythmic involuntary muscle contractions on sustained stretch, with brisk reflexes, typically lower-limb predominant. The discriminating sign of serotonin syndrome. Neuromuscular excitation, not the rigid hypertonia of NMS, is the serotonergic signature. Ocular clonus (slow continuous horizontal eye movements) is highly suggestive.

Waxy flexibility (cerea flexibilitas) and gegenhalten

In catatonia, limbs may hold a posture into which they are placed (waxy flexibility), or resist passive movement in proportion to the force applied (gegenhalten, paratonia). Posturing, mutism, negativism, staring, echophenomena, and stereotypy accompany the motor signs. These are the features that distinguish malignant catatonia from NMS at the bedside, when they are present.

Hyperthermia versus fever

Fever is a regulated rise in the hypothalamic set point (infection, inflammation). Hyperthermia is heat production outstripping dissipation with the set point unchanged, driven here by sustained muscle activity. The hyperthermia of NMS, MC, and SS responds poorly to antipyretics and requires physical cooling and treatment of the underlying muscular hyperactivity. Temperatures above 41 degrees Celsius signal life-threatening toxicity in any of these syndromes.6

The three axes

Each syndrome is, mechanistically, a disturbance on one neurotransmitter axis, and the axis predicts both the offending drug and the antidote.

The unifying idea

All four produce heat by the same final mechanism: sustained, involuntary skeletal muscle activity that the body cannot cool fast enough. The differences are upstream, in which neurochemical lesion is driving the muscle. Read the muscle (its rigidity type), read the reflexes, read the drug list, and you are reading the axis.

03 / NMSThe dopamine-blockade emergency

Neuroleptic malignant syndrome is an idiosyncratic, life-threatening reaction to dopamine antagonism, classically to antipsychotics but also to antiemetics (metoclopramide, prochlorperazine) and to the abrupt withdrawal of dopaminergic drugs. Mortality has fallen from around 20 to 30 per cent in older series to under 10 per cent today, attributed almost entirely to earlier recognition and withdrawal of the offending drug.2,4

Pathophysiology

The central event is acute reduction of dopaminergic transmission. D2 blockade in the hypothalamus impairs thermoregulation; in the nigrostriatal pathway it produces rigidity; in the mesolimbic and mesocortical pathways it contributes to altered mental status. The sustained muscle contraction generates heat and breaks down myocytes, releasing creatine kinase (CK) and myoglobin. A parallel literature frames NMS as a drug-induced variant of malignant catatonia, sharing the low serum iron of the acute-phase response and a common cortico-striato-thalamo-cortical circuit disturbance.5 This is not a semantic point: it is why benzodiazepines and ECT, the treatments for catatonia, also work in NMS.

Risk factors

Clinical features and tempo

NMS evolves over one to three days, more slowly than serotonin syndrome, and most cases begin within two weeks of starting or increasing the offending drug. The classic tetrad:

  1. Hyperthermia (above 38 degrees Celsius, often above 40), poorly responsive to antipyretics.
  2. Lead-pipe rigidity, generalised, often with tremor, dysphagia, dysarthria, sialorrhoea.
  3. Altered mental status, classically a fluctuating encephalopathy from alert mutism to stupor and coma.
  4. Autonomic instability: tachycardia, labile or high blood pressure, tachypnoea, diaphoresis, urinary incontinence.

Laboratory findings

International consensus criteria (Gurrera 2011)

A Delphi panel assigned priority weights to: recent dopamine antagonist exposure (or dopamine agonist withdrawal); hyperthermia (above 38.0 on two occasions); rigidity; mental status alteration; CK elevation (at least 4x ULN); sympathetic nervous system lability (defined by blood pressure elevation or fluctuation, diaphoresis, or incontinence); hypermetabolism (tachycardia plus tachypnoea); and a negative workup for other causes.1 The criteria formalise what the bedside already suggests: drug exposure plus the tetrad plus a clean exclusion.

Complications

Rhabdomyolysis and acute kidney injury, aspiration pneumonia, respiratory failure from chest wall rigidity, venous thromboembolism (a major and underappreciated cause of death in immobile, hyperthermic patients), disseminated intravascular coagulation, arrhythmia, and seizures.

04 / Malignant catatoniaStauder's lethal form

Catatonia is a psychomotor syndrome of motor, behavioural, and autonomic signs that occurs across psychiatric and medical illness. Malignant catatonia (historically lethal catatonia, described by Stauder in 1934) is catatonia with fever and autonomic instability, a medical emergency with mortality that approached 50 per cent before ECT and benzodiazepines. The crucial conceptual move, codified by the British Association for Psychopharmacology 2023 consensus, is that NMS is best understood as a drug-induced form of malignant catatonia.4,5 They sit on one spectrum. This reframing is what makes the differential tractable and the treatment rational.

Why this is the dangerous one to miss

Malignant catatonia is the syndrome where the reflexive psychiatric move, giving an antipsychotic to a febrile agitated or stuporous patient, is actively harmful: antipsychotics can precipitate or worsen malignant catatonia and convert it into NMS. The patient who is mute, posturing, and febrile and who is then given haloperidol for presumed agitation can deteriorate catastrophically. Recognising catatonia before reaching for an antipsychotic is the single most important safety habit in this entire differential.

Clinical features

Two phenotypes converge into the malignant form:

When fever, autonomic instability, and rigidity supervene on either, the label becomes malignant catatonia. Echophenomena (echolalia, echopraxia), automatic obedience, ambitendency, and grasp reflex may be present and are useful because they are not features of NMS or serotonin syndrome.

The Bush-Francis Catatonia Rating Scale

The Bush-Francis Catatonia Rating Scale (BFCRS) is the standard instrument: a 14-item screening subscale and a 23-item full scale rating excitement, immobility/stupor, mutism, staring, posturing, grimacing, echophenomena, stereotypy, mannerisms, negativism, waxy flexibility, withdrawal, autonomic abnormality, and others.4,21 Two or more screening items present is the usual threshold to suspect catatonia and proceed to a lorazepam challenge. The scale also tracks treatment response: a falling BFCRS score quantifies improvement (see section 08).13

Aetiology

Malignant catatonia is transdiagnostic. Causes include mood disorders (the commonest psychiatric cause), schizophrenia spectrum, autism, and a long list of medical and neurological precipitants: autoimmune encephalitis (especially anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis), CNS infection, metabolic derangement, and sudden withdrawal of clozapine or benzodiazepines.4,5,15,19 A medical cause must always be sought; catatonia is frequently the surface of a treatable organic illness.

05 / Serotonin syndromeThe 5-HT excess emergency

Serotonin syndrome, more precisely serotonin toxicity, is a dose-related spectrum of toxicity from increased central serotonergic activity, ranging from mild adverse effects to a life-threatening crisis. Incidence is rising with the prescription of serotonergic drugs.6 Unlike NMS, it is not idiosyncratic: it is a predictable consequence of too much serotonin, and the more serotonergic agents on board, the higher the risk.

Offending drugs and interactions

The dangerous combinations in real practice are an SSRI plus tramadol, an SSRI plus linezolid, and the switch between an SSRI and an MAOI without an adequate washout.

Tempo and clinical features

Onset is rapid, typically within 24 hours of a dose increase or a new serotonergic drug, often within 6 hours. This speed is itself a discriminator: NMS takes days. The triad:

  1. Neuromuscular excitation: clonus (spontaneous, inducible, or ocular), hyperreflexia, tremor, myoclonus, rigidity in severe cases. Findings are classically lower-limb predominant.
  2. Autonomic instability: hyperthermia, tachycardia, hypertension, diaphoresis, mydriasis (dilated pupils), flushing, hyperactive bowel sounds, diarrhoea.
  3. Altered mental status: agitation, anxiety, restlessness, confusion.
Hunter Serotonin Toxicity Criteria

In a patient who has taken a serotonergic agent, serotonin toxicity is diagnosed if any one of the following is present:6,7

The Hunter criteria (sensitivity ~84 per cent, specificity ~97 per cent against a toxicologist's diagnosis) outperform the older Sternbach criteria and centre on clonus, the feature that most reliably separates serotonin toxicity from NMS.

The pupils and the gut

Two bedside signs are quietly decisive. Mydriasis (dilated pupils) and hyperactive bowel sounds with diarrhoea point toward serotonin toxicity; NMS and malignant catatonia do not produce them. Conversely, the rigidity of severe serotonin toxicity can mimic NMS, which is why clonus and the drug history carry the diagnosis.

06 / EPSThe extrapyramidal family and its malignant edges

The extrapyramidal syndromes are the movement disorders of dopamine blockade. Most are not emergencies and are not confused with the hyperthermic crises, but they belong in this differential for two reasons: they share the offending drugs, and two of them sit at the dangerous edge where EPS shades into, or mimics, NMS.

The four classical EPS

The malignant edges

Two states are the real reason EPS is in this issue:

Severe parkinsonism versus early NMS

Severe drug-induced parkinsonism produces marked rigidity and can raise CK modestly. The discriminator is the rest of the picture: NMS adds hyperthermia, autonomic instability, encephalopathy, and a CK that climbs steeply. Isolated rigidity without fever or dysautonomia is parkinsonism; rigidity with the tetrad is NMS. The boundary is real and clinicians watching a rigid patient on antipsychotics must monitor temperature, autonomic signs, and serial CK precisely because EPS can be the antechamber to NMS.

Parkinsonism-hyperpyrexia syndrome (the NMS look-alike from the other direction)

In Parkinson's disease, abrupt withdrawal or reduction of dopaminergic medication (levodopa, dopamine agonists), including device failure such as a blocked deep brain stimulation battery or a malfunctioning intrathecal pump, produces a syndrome clinically indistinguishable from NMS: rigidity, fever, autonomic instability, raised CK.16 It is NMS by mechanism (dopamine deficit) but the trigger is removal of an agonist rather than addition of an antagonist. The treatment is the mirror image: restore the dopaminergic drug immediately. A related entity, dyskinesia-hyperpyrexia syndrome, follows dopaminergic excess. Baclofen withdrawal (a failed intrathecal pump) can produce a similar NMS-like crisis.17

07 / ConfusionWhy the four collapse into one picture

They are confused because, at the moment of presentation, they genuinely look alike. Four reasons converge.

Reason 01
A shared final pathway

All four end in sustained involuntary muscle activity producing hyperthermia, raised CK, and autonomic arousal. The output is the same regardless of the upstream lesion.

Reason 02
A shared population

The same patient, on antipsychotics and antidepressants, frequently with added analgesics and antiemetics, is at risk of all four at once. The drug list rarely points to only one.

Reason 03
A genuine spectrum

NMS and malignant catatonia are not merely similar; they are one disorder seen from two angles. Antipsychotic-induced catatonia is the bridge. The overlap is real biology, not diagnostic imprecision.

Reason 04
Encephalopathy hides the signs

A stuporous or delirious patient cannot report restlessness, cannot cooperate with a reflex examination, and cannot be assessed for the subtle clonus or posturing that would settle the question. The sickest patients are the hardest to classify.

The traps that follow from the confusion

08 / DiscriminatorsTelling them apart

This is the centre of the issue. The four are separated by the drug history, the tempo, the type of rigidity, the reflexes and pupils, the gut, the mental-status signature, and a small number of cheap tests. No single feature is pathognomonic; the pattern is. The comparison is split into two tables: history and examination first, then fever, laboratory, and the first treatment move.

Part A: History and examination

FeatureNMSMalignant catatoniaSerotonin syndromeSevere EPS
Offending drugDopamine antagonist started/raised; or dopaminergic withdrawalOften antipsychotic, but may precede any drug; medical/autoimmune triggersSerotonergic agent(s), interaction, or overdoseDopamine antagonist; dose-related
Onset / tempoDays (1 to 3), within 2 weeks of changeDays, may evolve from psychiatric prodromeRapid, within 24 h (often 6 h)Hours (dystonia) to weeks (parkinsonism)
Rigidity typeLead-pipe, generalised, severeRigidity plus posturing, waxy flexibility, gegenhaltenHypertonia, lower-limb predominant (severe cases)Cogwheel; sustained dystonic contraction
Reflexes / clonusNormal or reduced reflexes; no clonusVariable; no clonusHyperreflexia, clonus (spontaneous/inducible/ocular)Normal
PupilsNormalNormalMydriasis (dilated)Normal
Bowel soundsNormal or reducedNormal or reducedHyperactive, diarrhoeaNormal
Mental statusStupor, mutism, fluctuating encephalopathyMutism, staring, negativism, echophenomena, posturingAgitation, anxiety, restlessnessAlert (akathisia restless); normal sensorium

Part B: Fever, laboratory, and first move

FeatureNMSMalignant catatoniaSerotonin syndromeSevere EPS
FeverHigh, hours to days, antipyretic-resistantHigh in malignant formProportional to severity; can exceed 41 CAbsent (except parkinsonism-hyperpyrexia)
CKMarkedly high (often >1000; ≥4x ULN)Often raisedMild to moderate (severe if rigid)Normal or mildly raised
Serum ironLowLowNormalNormal
Lorazepam challengePartial benefit (spectrum overlap)Often responds (test and treatment)Sedates, reduces toneNo specific catatonic response
First treatment moveStop antagonist; supportive; dopaminergic agentLorazepam; ECT; avoid antipsychoticsStop serotonergic; benzodiazepine; coolingAnticholinergic (dystonia); reduce dose

Clonus points to serotonin. Lead-pipe rigidity points to dopamine. Waxy flexibility and posturing point to catatonia. The drug that changed, and when, points to all three at once, so let the body, not the prescription chart alone, cast the deciding vote.

The bedside heuristic

The bedside tools, in order of usefulness

T1
The lorazepam challenge. Give 1 to 2 mg of lorazepam intravenously (or intramuscularly), and reassess in 5 to 10 minutes, repeating once if needed. Marked relief of mutism, rigidity, and posturing supports catatonia and is simultaneously the start of treatment. The test is cheap, fast, and available everywhere. In a pediatric multisite cohort, BFCRS fell from 16.6 to 9.5 after lorazepam, a large effect; in Indian tertiary-care data the challenge predicted response best in the first week.13,14 Where ECT access is limited, zolpidem 5 to 10 mg has emerging evidence as an alternative challenge agent.12
T2
The reflex and clonus examination. Knees, ankles, and a careful look for ocular clonus. Hyperreflexia and clonus, lower-limb predominant, separate serotonin toxicity from the hyporeflexic rigidity of NMS. This single examination is the most discriminating physical finding in the differential.
T3
The Hunter criteria for serotonin toxicity and the BFCRS for catatonia. Apply both deliberately; they structure the examination and document the reasoning.
T4
Serial CK and serum iron. A steeply rising CK and a low serum iron support the NMS/malignant-catatonia end of the spectrum. A single value is less useful than the trend.
T5
Tests to exclude mimics: full blood count, cultures, lumbar puncture and neuroimaging where infection or encephalitis is possible, EEG (to exclude non-convulsive status and to support encephalitis), thyroid function, anti-NMDA receptor antibodies when catatonia is unexplained or refractory.19

Patient and life-stage factors

Course and prognosis

09 / ExcludeThe mimics that are not psychiatric

Before settling on a drug-induced syndrome, exclude the conditions that present identically and that a psychiatric anchor will cause you to miss. A negative workup for these is part of the NMS criteria for a reason.1

MimicDiscriminating featuresTest
CNS infection (meningitis, encephalitis)Meningism, headache, focal signs, prodromal illness; fever precedes rigidityLumbar puncture, neuroimaging, blood cultures
Anti-NMDA receptor encephalitisSubacute psychosis, catatonia, seizures, dyskinesia, autonomic instability; young women, often refractory catatoniaCSF and serum NMDAR antibodies, EEG, MRI, pelvic imaging (teratoma)19
Malignant hyperthermiaWithin minutes of volatile anaesthetic or succinylcholine; masseter spasm, hypercarbia; family historyAnaesthetic history, rising end-tidal CO2; dantrolene10
Sepsis / heat strokeSource of infection or environmental heat exposure; often hyporeflexic, vasodilatedCultures, lactate, imaging, exposure history
Anticholinergic toxidromeDry skin and mucosae (not diaphoretic), flushing, urinary retention, absent bowel sounds, mydriasisDrug history (antihistamines, TCAs, datura); clinical
Sympathomimetic toxicityCocaine, amphetamines; diaphoresis, mydriasis, severe hypertension; intact reflexesDrug history, urine toxicology
Thyroid stormGoitre, ophthalmopathy, atrial fibrillation, diarrhoea, precipitantTSH, free T4 and T3
Non-convulsive status epilepticusAltered consciousness without obvious convulsion; subtle eye or facial movementsEEG
Withdrawal (alcohol, benzodiazepine, baclofen)Tremor, autonomic arousal, seizures; baclofen pump failure mimics NMSHistory, device interrogation17
The discipline

The anticholinergic toxidrome is the most elegant near-miss: it shares mydriasis and agitation with serotonin syndrome but the skin is dry, the bowel sounds are absent, and there is no clonus, the inverse of the serotonergic gut and the serotonergic reflexes. Touch the skin and listen to the abdomen before you commit.

10 / ManagementBy syndrome, in depth

Management has two layers: the supportive care that every one of these patients needs from the first minute, and the syndrome-specific therapy that follows the diagnosis. The supportive layer buys the time in which the diagnosis declares itself.

Shared supportive care (all four)

NMS-specific

Malignant catatonia-specific

Serotonin syndrome-specific

EPS-specific

The honest algorithm for the patient you cannot yet classify

Often the diagnosis is not clear in the first hour, and the patient cannot wait. A safe empirical sequence:

01
Stop the suspects and support. Withhold all antipsychotics and all serotonergic drugs at once; never give an antipsychotic to sedate. Begin cooling, fluids, monitoring, and VTE prophylaxis. This is safe whichever of the four it turns out to be.
02
Examine for the discriminators. Clonus and pupils (serotonin), lead-pipe rigidity (NMS), posturing and waxy flexibility (catatonia). Send CK, serum iron, FBC, renal function, and screen for mimics.
03
Give a benzodiazepine. Lorazepam 1 to 2 mg parenterally serves three purposes at once: it treats agitation, it is therapeutic for catatonia and NMS, and a clear catatonic response is diagnostic. Responds: favour catatonia, continue and escalate lorazepam.
04
If serotonergic drugs are implicated and clonus is present, treat as serotonin syndrome (supportive plus cyproheptadine if needed). If lead-pipe rigidity, high CK, and the tetrad dominate, treat as NMS (dantrolene, dopamine agonist).
05
If the patient is deteriorating and you still cannot separate NMS from malignant catatonia, proceed to ECT. It treats both, and indecision is more dangerous than ECT. ECT is the unifying answer at the dangerous end of the spectrum.

11 / Indian frameAvailability, access, and the law

The textbook algorithm assumes a pharmacy that India often does not have. What you can do depends on what is on the shelf, and the gap reshapes the priorities.

The dantrolene problem

Intravenous dantrolene, the muscle relaxant for severe NMS (and the specific antidote for malignant hyperthermia), is not reliably available in India. It is import-dependent, brand-only with no generic, expensive, and stocked in a small number of metropolitan centres; it is often obtained on a named-patient import basis, and shelf life is short.22 The practical consequence: Indian management of severe NMS leans more heavily on the universally available levers, namely stopping the antipsychotic, aggressive supportive care, benzodiazepines, oral bromocriptine and amantadine, and early ECT. A clinician should know in advance whether their hospital can obtain dantrolene at all, because discovering the answer during a crisis is too late.

What is available and cheap

ECT and the law

India is, in one respect, well placed: ECT is widely practised and accessible, which matters because ECT is the definitive treatment for malignant catatonia and the fallback for NMS that cannot be separated from it. Under the Mental Healthcare Act 2017, ECT requires modified technique (anaesthesia and muscle relaxation), is prohibited for minors without Mental Health Review Board approval, and ordinarily requires informed consent. In the emergency of malignant catatonia, where the patient lacks capacity and delay is life-threatening, ECT may proceed under the Act's emergency provisions with the appropriate consent pathway (nominated representative, and Board processes as applicable). Document capacity, the emergency, the consent route, and the clinical reasoning carefully; this is both good practice and medicolegal protection.

Documentation in the Indian medicolegal context

These are high-mortality syndromes in patients who frequently lack capacity, on drugs the clinician prescribed. Record the indication for the original drug, the recognition of the syndrome, the time the offending drug was stopped, the consent pathway for ECT, and the involvement of family or nominated representative. A clear contemporaneous record is the single best defence if an outcome is poor.

12 / The patientThe case in the lede, resolved

Return to the 24-year-old. He is on haloperidol, raised three weeks ago, and sertraline, added five days ago. He is mute and posturing, with limbs that hold the position they are placed in, lead-pipe in quality, febrile at 39.4, tachycardic, labile, diaphoretic. The intern saw the recent sertraline and thought serotonin syndrome. But there is no clonus, no hyperreflexia, no mydriasis, and no diarrhoea: the serotonergic signature is absent. The registrar saw the haloperidol and the lead-pipe rigidity and high suspicion of a rising CK, and thought NMS, which is closer. The consultant saw the posturing, the waxy flexibility, the mutism, and recognised that NMS and malignant catatonia are the same spectrum, and that the safest and most informative next move is not an antipsychotic and not cyproheptadine but a vial of lorazepam.

Lorazepam 2 mg is given intravenously. Within ten minutes the posturing eases and he speaks a few words. The picture is malignant catatonia, very likely antipsychotic-related, on the NMS-catatonia spectrum. The haloperidol is stopped, the sertraline is held, supportive care and VTE prophylaxis begin, CK returns at 4,200 IU/L and serum iron is low (consistent with the spectrum), and the meningitis and encephalitis workup is sent and is clean. He is escalated on lorazepam and, because he remains febrile and rigid the next morning, ECT is started. He recovers over a week. The antipsychotic question is deferred until the catatonia has fully resolved, and is then approached with a low-dose second-generation agent under close monitoring.

The lesson of the case is the lesson of the issue. The most recently changed drug is not always the culprit. The serotonergic signature is specific, and its absence matters as much as its presence. And when the dangerous end of the spectrum cannot be parsed into NMS versus malignant catatonia, the benzodiazepine challenge and then ECT answer the question by treating both.

13 / PearlsShort clinical pearls

01
Clonus is the keystone. Lower-limb-predominant clonus and hyperreflexia mean serotonin until proven otherwise. NMS does not produce clonus.
02
Read the rigidity. Lead-pipe is dopamine (NMS). Waxy flexibility and posturing are catatonia. Cogwheel is parkinsonism.
03
Tempo separates. Hours to one day favours serotonin syndrome. One to three days favours NMS.
04
Pupils and gut. Mydriasis, hyperactive bowel sounds, and diarrhoea point to serotonin; their absence argues against it.
05
Never give an antipsychotic to sedate a febrile rigid patient until you have excluded malignant catatonia. It can be fatal.
06
The lorazepam challenge is test and treatment. Cheap, fast, available, and diagnostic. Use it early.
07
NMS and malignant catatonia are one spectrum. ECT treats both, so it is the answer when you cannot separate them.
08
Don't anchor on the last drug changed. The antipsychotic raised three weeks ago can be the culprit, not the antidepressant added last week.
09
Dry skin, absent bowel sounds, no clonus with agitation and mydriasis is anticholinergic toxicity, not serotonin syndrome.
10
Parkinson's patient, fever, rigidity? Ask what dopaminergic drug was stopped or which device failed. Restart it; do not stop it.
11
Cyproheptadine is an adjunct, not a rescue. Stopping the drugs and supporting the patient is the cornerstone of serotonin-syndrome care.
12
Know your dantrolene access before the crisis. In much of India it is unavailable; plan for supportive care, bromocriptine, and ECT.
13
Refractory catatonia in a young patient? Send anti-NMDA receptor antibodies and look for a tumour. Immunotherapy, not benzodiazepines alone.
14
Venous thromboembolism kills. Immobile, hyperthermic, dehydrated patients need prophylaxis from hour one.

14 / References

  1. Gurrera RJ, Caroff SN, Cohen A, et al. An international consensus study of neuroleptic malignant syndrome diagnostic criteria using the Delphi method. J Clin Psychiatry. 2011;72(9):1222-1228. doi.org/10.4088/JCP.10m06438
  2. Ware MR, Feller DB, Hall KL. Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome: Diagnosis and Management. Prim Care Companion CNS Disord. 2018;20(1):17r02185. doi.org/10.4088/PCC.17r02185
  3. Strawn JR, Keck PE, Caroff SN. Neuroleptic malignant syndrome. Am J Psychiatry. 2007;164(6):870-876. doi.org/10.1176/ajp.2007.164.6.870
  4. Rogers JP, Oldham MA, Fricchione G, et al. Evidence-based consensus guidelines for the management of catatonia: Recommendations from the British Association for Psychopharmacology. J Psychopharmacol. 2023;37(4):327-369. doi.org/10.1177/02698811231158232
  5. Beach SR, Luccarelli J, Praschan N, Fusunyan M, Fricchione GL. Molecular and immunological origins of catatonia. Schizophr Res. 2023;263:169-177. doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2023.03.013
  6. Mikkelsen N, Damkier P, Pedersen SA. Serotonin syndrome - A focused review. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2023;133(2):124-129. doi.org/10.1111/bcpt.13912
  7. Dunkley EJC, Isbister GK, Sibbritt D, Dawson AH, Whyte IM. The Hunter Serotonin Toxicity Criteria: simple and accurate diagnostic decision rules for serotonin toxicity. QJM. 2003;96(9):635-642. doi.org/10.1093/qjmed/hcg109
  8. Chiew AL, Isbister GK. The serotonin toxidrome: shortfalls in current management. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2024;91(3):654-661. doi.org/10.1111/bcp.16152
  9. King E, Rotella JA. Efficacy of cyproheptadine in the management of serotonin toxicity following deliberate self-poisoning: a systematic review. Emerg Med Australas. 2025;37(1):e14554. doi.org/10.1111/1742-6723.14554
  10. Horseman M, Panahi L, Udeani G, et al. Drug-Induced Hyperthermia Review. Cureus. 2022;14(7):e27278. doi.org/10.7759/cureus.27278
  11. Boyer EW, Shannon M. The serotonin syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2005;352(11):1112-1120. doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra041867
  12. Gunther M, Tran N, Jiang S. Zolpidem for the Management of Catatonia: A Systematic Review. J Acad Consult Liaison Psychiatry. 2024;66(1):49-56. doi.org/10.1016/j.jaclp.2024.10.004
  13. Luccarelli J, McCoy TH, York T, et al. The effectiveness of the lorazepam challenge test in pediatric catatonia: A multisite retrospective cohort study. Schizophr Res. 2024;270:410-415. doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2024.07.004
  14. Latke R, Sinha D, Miskin T, Mane A. The retrospective and observational study of catatonia: diagnosis, course of illness, and response to lorazepam in a tertiary health-care center. J Neurosci Rural Pract. 2023;14(2):258-263. doi.org/10.25259/JNRP_36_2022
  15. Zwiebel S, de Leon J. Maintenance treatment of catatonia with benzodiazepines: A case series and literature review. Neuropsychopharmacol Hung. 2024;26(4):243-260.
  16. Wang JY, Huang JF, Zhu SG, et al. Parkinsonism-Hyperpyrexia Syndrome and Dyskinesia-Hyperpyrexia Syndrome in Parkinson's Disease: Two Cases and Literature Review. J Parkinsons Dis. 2022;12(6):1727-1735. doi.org/10.3233/JPD-223362
  17. Barnett BS, Balaji D, Weleff J, Carroll BT. Catatonia and Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome in Patients With Cerebral Palsy: Two Case Reports and a Systematic Review. J Acad Consult Liaison Psychiatry. 2023;64(3):277-293. doi.org/10.1016/j.jaclp.2022.12.008
  18. Erken N, Kaya D, Dost FS, Ates Bulut E, Isik AT. Antidepressant-induced serotonin syndrome in older patients: a cross-sectional study. Psychogeriatrics. 2022;22(4):502-508. doi.org/10.1111/psyg.12849
  19. Padureanu V, Dop D, Padureanu R, et al. Anti-NMDA Receptor Encephalitis: A Narrative Review. Brain Sci. 2025;15(5):518. doi.org/10.3390/brainsci15050518
  20. Apetauerova D, Patel PA, Burns JD, Lerner DP. Movement Disorder Emergencies. Neurol Clin. 2021;39(2):615-630. doi.org/10.1016/j.ncl.2021.01.005
  21. Bush G, Fink M, Petrides G, Dowling F, Francis A. Catatonia I: Rating scale and standardized examination (Bush-Francis Catatonia Rating Scale). Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1996;93(2):129-136. doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0447.1996.tb09814.x
  22. Taylor DM, Barnes TRE, Young AH. The Maudsley Prescribing Guidelines in Psychiatry. 15th ed. Wiley-Blackwell; 2021. (NMS, catatonia, and EPS management.)
  23. Indian availability data. Dantrolene sodium injection: named-patient import status, metro-centre stocking, and cost in India (distributor and pharmacy listings). Indian Pharma Network; Tata 1mg. Accessed 2026.
  24. Indian availability data. Cyproheptadine 4 mg tablets (Practin, Ciplactin): brand and pricing listings. IndiaMART distributor listings. Accessed 2026.
  25. Simon LV, Hashmi MF, Callahan AL. Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome. StatPearls. NCBI Bookshelf; 2024. (Dantrolene, bromocriptine, amantadine dosing and mortality data.)

Educational note. This clinical-reasoning essay is for clinicians and students. It is educational, not treatment advice for any individual. Care decisions belong with the treating clinician. At Weave, care is led by Dr. Niharika Reddy, Consultant Psychiatrist.

Crisis support

  • Tele-MANAS 14416, 1800-891-4416 (24x7, Government of India)
  • Emergency 112
  • iCall 9152987821 (Mon-Sat, 10am-8pm; hours may vary)
  • Vandrevala Foundation 1860-2662-345 (24x7)
  • AASRA 9820466726 (24x7)
If you want to move from reading to care: Explore services WhatsApp Weave

Aporia 05 - Heat and Iron. Built from the British Association for Psychopharmacology 2023 catatonia consensus guideline, the Gurrera international NMS consensus criteria, the Hunter Serotonin Toxicity Criteria, and reviews and case series current to 2025, cross-checked against the Maudsley Prescribing Guidelines (15th ed). Drug doses, the Hunter decision rule, and the lorazepam-challenge technique were verified against primary sources during the build. This issue is a clinical reasoning aid for qualified clinicians, not a protocol; it does not replace local emergency and ICU pathways, senior consultation, or the prescribing information for any drug. Doses must be checked against current references and the individual patient before administration. Dr. Wilfred D'souza, Weave - Centre for Integrative Psychiatry. Series: Aporia - clinical dilemmas in psychiatry.